From onefiftyfour at hotmail.com Mon Sep 2 13:59:20 2013 From: onefiftyfour at hotmail.com (eric L) Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 08:59:20 -0500 Subject: [Shotwell] Status of Video thumbnail issue in latest shotwell In-Reply-To: References: , Message-ID: I've read the FAQ entry concerning video thumbnails and Shotwell 0.14.x Is there any idea how soon this will be resolved? Is there anything I can do now? I'm using gstreamer1.x86_64 1.0.9-1.fc19 with Shotwell 0.15.0pr1+trunk. My issue is that I only see the video icon for video thumbnails. Are all users of the latest shotwell not seeing custom video thumbnails? Thanks for the help. Sincerely, -Eric From jim at yorba.org Tue Sep 3 22:48:01 2013 From: jim at yorba.org (Jim Nelson) Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 22:41:01 -0007 Subject: [Shotwell] Status of Video thumbnail issue in latest shotwell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <52266714.e49b420a.630f.0060@mx.google.com> To answer your last question first, no, many video formats are supported and users are seeing thumbnails for those videos. When you say you only see an icon, do you mean when you're importing the video? Or after its imported? If they've been imported, can you look at their directory in Nautilus while in icon view? Do you see thumbnails then? -- Jim On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 6:59 AM, eric L wrote: > I've read the FAQ entry concerning video thumbnails and Shotwell > 0.14.x > > Is there any idea how soon this will be resolved? Is there anything > I can do now? > > I'm using gstreamer1.x86_64 1.0.9-1.fc19 with Shotwell > 0.15.0pr1+trunk. > > My issue is that I only see the video icon for video thumbnails. > > Are all users of the latest shotwell not seeing custom video > thumbnails? > > Thanks for the help. > > Sincerely, > -Eric > > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > From jim at yorba.org Tue Sep 3 23:20:19 2013 From: jim at yorba.org (Jim Nelson) Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 23:13:19 -0007 Subject: [Shotwell] database operation In-Reply-To: <1377933700.4937.YahooMailNeo@web142801.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> References: <1377933700.4937.YahooMailNeo@web142801.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <52266ea5.87e7440a.1023.ffffe47f@mx.google.com> Officially we don't recommend users manipulate the database directly. If you do, I highly recommend working on copies of both of them. You have to be a little careful that the Photo IDs correspond to the same photo in both databases -- it's possible that they do not, depending on how the database was used after the backup snapshot was taken. You might consider matching on filename rather than ID. -- Jim On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Xavier Thibert wrote: > Dear all, > This question is about manipulation of the database "photo.db" of > the program Shotwell. > > For some reason I have lost my rating on many pictures 10 000 > range. It was probably a mistake of mine. I have an old backup of the > database that I will call "oldPhoto.db". Since I have lost my rating > I did a lot of new rating, importation, and many open and closing of > shotwell, so I cannot just use the "photo.db.bak". I don't want to > replace "Photo.db" by "oldPhoto.db" and lose the new work. > > I realized that the database is a SQL (I don't know it, but I > know how powerful it is). For a knowledgeable person I think it is a > 15 liner problem or such. What I want to do is in pseudo code bwlow. > > > #------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > foreach [id in photo.db-PhotoTable]{ > x= the rating associate with id > if [ x==0 ]{ > y= the rating of oldPhoto.db-PhotoTable-same id as above > if [ y > x ]{ > x=y > write the new x in photo.db rating of corresponding id > } > } > } > save photo.db > #----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Best regards, > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > From onefiftyfour at hotmail.com Wed Sep 4 02:31:30 2013 From: onefiftyfour at hotmail.com (onefiftyfour) Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 21:31:30 -0500 Subject: [Shotwell] Status of Video thumbnail issue in latest shotwell Message-ID: I mean after the import I don't see thumbnails, just the standard video icon in the library. I do have thumbnails working outside of shotwell in my file browser. Thanks for helping. What else can I check? -------- Original message -------- From: Jim Nelson Date: To: eric L Cc: shotwell list Subject: Re: [Shotwell] Status of Video thumbnail issue in latest shotwell To answer your last question first, no, many video formats are supported and users are seeing thumbnails for those videos. When you say you only see an icon, do you mean when you're importing the video? Or after its imported? If they've been imported, can you look at their directory in Nautilus while in icon view? Do you see thumbnails then? -- Jim On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 6:59 AM, eric L wrote: > I've read the FAQ entry concerning video thumbnails and Shotwell > 0.14.x > > Is there any idea how soon this will be resolved? Is there anything > I can do now? > > I'm using gstreamer1.x86_64 1.0.9-1.fc19 with Shotwell > 0.15.0pr1+trunk. > > My issue is that I only see the video icon for video thumbnails. > > Are all users of the latest shotwell not seeing custom video > thumbnails? > > Thanks for the help. > > Sincerely, > -Eric > > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > From thomas at xyz.pp.se Wed Sep 4 11:11:36 2013 From: thomas at xyz.pp.se (Thomas Novin) Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 13:11:36 +0200 Subject: [Shotwell] Re-create certain thumbnail In-Reply-To: References: <513B5736.1070609@gmail.com> Message-ID: The reply took a while I guess but yes, the problem still exists. Some imports the thumbnails are mostly grey but some imports they are mostly good. I don't think I have seen this problem with files that are directly copied from camera but only the ones I have converted from h264 to x264 to add date metadata (with avconv, like 'avconv -y -i oldname.mts -metadata creation_time="$DATE" -c:a copy -c:v libx264 -crf 18 -preset veryfast newname.mp4'. The package is installed: ii gstreamer1.0-plugins-bad:i386 1.0.6-1ubuntu1 i386 GStreamer plugins from the "bad" set And as always: nautlius/nemo always produces good thumbnails from these files. Rgds//Thomas On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Clint Rogers wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > Are you still having problems with this? Please let us know. > > Also, just to reconfirm, you have the version of plugins-bad for 1.0 > installed already, right? > > Cheers, > -c > > On 12/03/2013, Thomas Novin wrote: > > Not very good I guess, I already have "bad thumbnails" so they are not > > empty. > > > > > https://xyz.pp.se/~thnov/up/Screenshot%20from%202013-03-12%2017:44:09.png > > > > However, I still get gray thumbnails on certain videos when I import > > new ones, even after the issue was closed. But still all is good in > > Nautilus. > > > > Rgds//Thomas > > > > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Clint Rogers wrote: > >> Hi Thomas, > >> > >> What should happen is that, if you install or update one or more > >> GStreamer codecs, Shotwell should pick up on this the next time it's > >> launched, and attempt to thumbnail any video files for which it > >> doesn't have thumbnails already. There shouldn't be any need to blow > >> away your other good thumbnails, though. > >> > >> Can you try this and let us know if it works? > >> > >> Cheers, > >> -c > >> > >> > >> On 11/03/2013, Thomas Novin wrote: > >>> My issue is with video-files so I don't think I can do rotate there. > >>> > >>> Any other suggestion? Since I have a 20-30k+ library it seems a bit > >>> hefty to remove all thumbnails just to re-create 100 :) > >>> > >>> Rgds//Thomas > >>> > >>> On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Joseph Bylund > > >>> wrote: > >>>> Thomas, > >>>> I believe rotate-undo works, the original message says it does not > work > >>>> for > >>>> raw files. > >>>> http://lists.yorba.org/pipermail/shotwell/2011-November/003309.html > >>>> -Joe > >>>> > >>>> On 03/09/2013 07:48 AM, Thomas Novin wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Hello > >>>>> > >>>>> Is it possible to re-generate thumbnails for just some file(s)? I > have > >>>>> some bad thumbnails because of Bug #6452 but I want to re-generate > >>>>> them when I have the fixed version of Shotwell. > >>>>> > >>>>> Rgds//Thomas > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> Shotwell mailing list > >>>>> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > >>>>> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > >>>> > >>>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Shotwell mailing list > >>> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > >>> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > >>> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> --------------------------- > >> "I asked if Sodium, Bromine and Oxygen wanted to hang out, but they > >> were like 'Na Br O'..." > > > > > -- > --------------------------- > "I asked if Sodium, Bromine and Oxygen wanted to hang out, but they > were like 'Na Br O'..." > From thomas at xyz.pp.se Wed Sep 4 20:18:43 2013 From: thomas at xyz.pp.se (Thomas Novin) Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 22:18:43 +0200 Subject: [Shotwell] ~/.cache/shotwell/shotwell.log Message-ID: Hello When Shotwell detects a photo (watch directory), would it not be good to write an entry to ~/.cache/shotwell/shotwell.log? In my system, it doesn't. And I have seen stuff in the log indicating that it does write when you remove.. but maybe only photos, not videos? Just added a .3gp-video. Nothing written. But it did appear in the DB a while after adding. Then removed it. Nothing written. But did disappear from the DB and populate missing files. Then added a .jpg. Nothing written, nothing added to the DB. Then removed a .jpg. Written in the log. Running shotwell 0.14.1-1~quantal1. Rgds//Thomas From thomas at xyz.pp.se Wed Sep 4 20:37:30 2013 From: thomas at xyz.pp.se (Thomas Novin) Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 22:37:30 +0200 Subject: [Shotwell] Lots of video files missing from Shotwell library Message-ID: Hello I have discovered that lots of videos are missing from my library (but not the filesystem). I think this is because I have imported these files before, removed them and then imported them again. Also moving them manually in the filesystem. So now I have the files in my shotwell data dir but they are not in the DB and not detected even though I have watch enabled. What can I do to fix this? They are spread around in different directories so I'm not sure exactly which are missing. I can see in Shotwell that it has 25057 objects in the DB but if I do 'find . -type f | wc -l' in my data-dir I get 25432. So 375 missing. Rgds//Thomas From lombaardcj at gmail.com Fri Sep 6 19:07:00 2013 From: lombaardcj at gmail.com (Chris Lombaard) Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 21:07:00 +0200 Subject: [Shotwell] What may cause an import to crash? Message-ID: Hi Shotwell team, I know there are propably more important issues to track down so I'll be brief. Since upgrading to 0.14.1 I seem to be unable to import even small sets of photos. I've opened a Bug report #7447 where the logs are also submitted. How can I help to find the problem? Might it be invalid Pictures, too large files, who knows? -- Regards, Chris Lombaard From joseph.bylund at gmail.com Fri Sep 6 19:22:29 2013 From: joseph.bylund at gmail.com (Joseph Bylund) Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 15:22:29 -0400 Subject: [Shotwell] What may cause an import to crash? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <522A2B75.6040102@gmail.com> On 09/06/2013 03:07 PM, Chris Lombaard wrote: > Hi Shotwell team, > > I know there are propably more important issues to track down so I'll be > brief. > > Since upgrading to 0.14.1 I seem to be unable to import even small sets of > photos. Chris, Are you using the git version? (I'm guessing not since that just got bumped to some sort of 0.15). Any chance you could monitor memory usage during the import? (watching top and then giving a general description is probably sufficient for the moment). What do you see if you attempt to import a single photo? At the moment this does look like some sort of bug, possibly with the image cache. It looks like get_prefetched_copy is giving null, so possibly populate prefetched isn't working right there (photo.vala:3320ish). -Joe > > I've opened a Bug report #7447 where the logs are also submitted. > > How can I help to find the problem? Might it be invalid Pictures, too > large files, who knows? > From Jim at jamesahart.us Sat Sep 7 13:16:43 2013 From: Jim at jamesahart.us (jh) Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2013 09:16:43 -0400 Subject: [Shotwell] Flickr upload order Message-ID: <522B273B.8030100@jamesahart.us> Does anyone know what order Shotwell uploads multiple photos? I tried to publish my entire library of 2400+ pics. Shotwell got through 1300 of them and froze. Now I don't know which ones it sent. If I delete them all from Flickr and publish from Shotwell in 2 pieces, I'll exceed the monthly Flickr quota and have to wait until October to do the second half. The alternative is to wade through 1300 pics one at a time. Yuck! So, again, does Shotwell use any sort of algoithm for the order that it uploads? Date? Name? ??? From jim at yorba.org Mon Sep 9 19:02:50 2013 From: jim at yorba.org (Jim Nelson) Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2013 18:55:50 -0007 Subject: [Shotwell] Status of Video thumbnail issue in latest shotwell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <522e1b57.454b440a.5211.5689@mx.google.com> I suppose the next step would be to examine the shotwell.log in ~/.cache/shotwell and see if any messages appear that describe problems generating video thumbnails. -- Jim On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 7:31 PM, onefiftyfour wrote: > I mean after the import I don't see thumbnails, just the standard > video icon in the library. I do have thumbnails working outside of > shotwell in my file browser. > > Thanks for helping. What else can I check? > > -------- Original message -------- > From: Jim Nelson > Date: > To: eric L > Cc: shotwell list > Subject: Re: [Shotwell] Status of Video thumbnail issue in latest > shotwell > > > > To answer your last question first, no, many video formats are > supported and users are seeing thumbnails for those videos. > When you say you only see an icon, do you mean when you're importing > the video? Or after its imported? > If they've been imported, can you look at their directory in Nautilus > while in icon view? Do you see thumbnails then? > -- Jim > > On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 6:59 AM, eric L > wrote: > >> I've read the FAQ entry concerning video thumbnails and Shotwell >> 0.14.x >> >> Is there any idea how soon this will be resolved? Is there anything >> I can do now? >> >> I'm using gstreamer1.x86_64 1.0.9-1.fc19 with Shotwell >> 0.15.0pr1+trunk. >> >> My issue is that I only see the video icon for video thumbnails. >> >> Are all users of the latest shotwell not seeing custom video >> thumbnails? >> >> Thanks for the help. >> >> Sincerely, >> -Eric >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Shotwell mailing list >> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > From ryanlists at gmail.com Tue Sep 10 13:11:05 2013 From: ryanlists at gmail.com (Ryan Krauss) Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 08:11:05 -0500 Subject: [Shotwell] problems moving files Message-ID: I am trying to consolidate all my photos under one shotwell directory. Some of my photos were copied into that folder and some where not when I imported them (some were imported in place and that is not what I want). I have written some python code to access the shotwell database to help me find the files not in the correct folder. As I understand from point 2 under this heading: http://redmine.yorba.org/projects/shotwell/wiki/ShotwellFAQ#How-can-I-move-my-photo-files-from-one-directory-or-hard-drive-to-another I should be able to move them, have them show up as missing, and then re-import them from the new folder. When I try and re-import them, I am told that the duplicates will not be imported and the files stay in the missing file area. I only seem to have this problem with videos. With still images, they are re-found correctly, in fact, I don't even seem to have to re-import them. The relocated files are found automatically when shotwell starts up. What am I doing wrong here? Thanks, Ryan From juliette.tux at gmail.com Tue Sep 10 15:23:26 2013 From: juliette.tux at gmail.com (Juliette Tux) Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 19:23:26 +0400 Subject: [Shotwell] Missing strings in Russian translation Message-ID: Hello, Could somebody please check the .pot and Russian .po for Shoptwell translation on https://www.transifex.com/projects/p/shotwell/ against the source code files? The Transifex translation is 100% complete but we've found some not translated strings in the version 0.14.1-1 ( https://abf.rosalinux.ru/build_lists/1220283 ) See screenshot here: http://rghost.ru/48677006/image.png -- best regards, Julia Dronova From jim at yorba.org Tue Sep 10 19:04:24 2013 From: jim at yorba.org (Jim Nelson) Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 18:57:24 -0007 Subject: [Shotwell] problems moving files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <522f6d34.c99f420a.57f1.fffff281@mx.google.com> What version of Shotwell are you using? -- Jim On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 6:11 AM, Ryan Krauss wrote: > I am trying to consolidate all my photos under one shotwell > directory. Some > of my photos were copied into that folder and some where not when I > imported them (some were imported in place and that is not what I > want). I > have written some python code to access the shotwell database to help > me > find the files not in the correct folder. As I understand from point 2 > under this heading: > http://redmine.yorba.org/projects/shotwell/wiki/ShotwellFAQ#How-can-I-move-my-photo-files-from-one-directory-or-hard-drive-to-another > I should be able to move them, have them show up as missing, and then > re-import them from the new folder. When I try and re-import them, I > am > told that the duplicates will not be imported and the files stay in > the > missing file area. > > I only seem to have this problem with videos. With still images, they > are > re-found correctly, in fact, I don't even seem to have to re-import > them. > The relocated files are found automatically when shotwell starts up. > > What am I doing wrong here? > > Thanks, > > Ryan > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > From jim at yorba.org Tue Sep 10 19:24:24 2013 From: jim at yorba.org (Jim Nelson) Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 19:17:24 -0007 Subject: [Shotwell] Missing strings in Russian translation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <522f71e4.2683420a.1664.fffff5a0@mx.google.com> Thanks for reporting this. It appears there's a problem in the script file that generates the .pot files. We'll get this fixed for the 0.15 release. I've ticketed it here: http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/7459 -- Jim On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Juliette Tux wrote: > Hello, > Could somebody please check the .pot and Russian .po for Shoptwell > translation on https://www.transifex.com/projects/p/shotwell/ against > the > source code files? The Transifex translation is 100% complete but > we've > found some not translated strings in the version 0.14.1-1 ( > https://abf.rosalinux.ru/build_lists/1220283 ) See screenshot here: > http://rghost.ru/48677006/image.png > > -- > best regards, > Julia Dronova > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > From jim at yorba.org Tue Sep 10 20:14:53 2013 From: jim at yorba.org (Jim Nelson) Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 20:07:53 -0007 Subject: [Shotwell] ~/.cache/shotwell/shotwell.log In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <522f7dba.e282440a.355b.ffffe8ce@mx.google.com> It's a good idea. I've ticketed that here: http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/7461 -- Jim On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Thomas Novin wrote: > Hello > > When Shotwell detects a photo (watch directory), would it not be good > to > write an entry to ~/.cache/shotwell/shotwell.log? > > In my system, it doesn't. > > And I have seen stuff in the log indicating that it does write when > you > remove.. but maybe only photos, not videos? > > Just added a .3gp-video. Nothing written. But it did appear in the DB > a > while after adding. > > Then removed it. Nothing written. But did disappear from the DB and > populate missing files. > > Then added a .jpg. Nothing written, nothing added to the DB. > > Then removed a .jpg. Written in the log. > > Running shotwell 0.14.1-1~quantal1. > > Rgds//Thomas > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > From jim at yorba.org Tue Sep 10 20:19:40 2013 From: jim at yorba.org (Jim Nelson) Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 20:12:40 -0007 Subject: [Shotwell] Lots of video files missing from Shotwell library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <522f7ed8.68f2440a.1637.ffffdd19@mx.google.com> It sounds like video files are not being moved out of Missing Files when imported. We had an earlier report about that, but now I can reproduce this easily. I've ticketed it here: http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/7462 -- Jim On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Thomas Novin wrote: > Hello > > I have discovered that lots of videos are missing from my library > (but not > the filesystem). I think this is because I have imported these files > before, removed them and then imported them again. Also moving them > manually in the filesystem. > > So now I have the files in my shotwell data dir but they are not in > the DB > and not detected even though I have watch enabled. > > What can I do to fix this? They are spread around in different > directories > so I'm not sure exactly which are missing. > > I can see in Shotwell that it has 25057 objects in the DB but if I do > 'find > . -type f | wc -l' in my data-dir I get 25432. So 375 missing. > > Rgds//Thomas > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > From jim at yorba.org Tue Sep 10 20:22:44 2013 From: jim at yorba.org (Jim Nelson) Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 20:15:44 -0007 Subject: [Shotwell] Flickr upload order In-Reply-To: <522B273B.8030100@jamesahart.us> References: <522B273B.8030100@jamesahart.us> Message-ID: <522f7f91.a700420a.2c8d.0716@mx.google.com> I believe for Flickr the images are published from oldest to newest, as that makes it look "right" for the photostream (newest images shown first). -- Jim On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 6:16 AM, jh wrote: > Does anyone know what order Shotwell uploads multiple photos? I tried > to publish my entire library of 2400+ pics. Shotwell got through 1300 > of them and froze. Now I don't know which ones it sent. If I delete > them all from Flickr and publish from Shotwell in 2 pieces, I'll > exceed the monthly Flickr quota and have to wait until October to do > the second half. The alternative is to wade through 1300 pics one at > a time. Yuck! So, again, does Shotwell use any sort of algoithm for > the order that it uploads? Date? Name? ??? > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From thomas at xyz.pp.se Wed Sep 11 13:26:18 2013 From: thomas at xyz.pp.se (Thomas Novin) Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 15:26:18 +0200 Subject: [Shotwell] Lots of video files missing from Shotwell library In-Reply-To: <522f7ed8.68f2440a.1637.ffffdd19@mx.google.com> References: <522f7ed8.68f2440a.1637.ffffdd19@mx.google.com> Message-ID: Hi Ok, that's nice. Any suggestion on how I can fix my problem manually? I would really like to get these 375 files detected. Rgds//Thomas On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 10:19 PM, Jim Nelson wrote: > It sounds like video files are not being moved out of Missing Files when > imported. We had an earlier report about that, but now I can reproduce > this easily. > > I've ticketed it here: http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/7462 > > -- Jim > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Thomas Novin wrote: > > Hello I have discovered that lots of videos are missing from my library > (but not the filesystem). I think this is because I have imported these > files before, removed them and then imported them again. Also moving them > manually in the filesystem. So now I have the files in my shotwell data dir > but they are not in the DB and not detected even though I have watch > enabled. What can I do to fix this? They are spread around in different > directories so I'm not sure exactly which are missing. I can see in > Shotwell that it has 25057 objects in the DB but if I do 'find . -type f | > wc -l' in my data-dir I get 25432. So 375 missing. Rgds//Thomas > _______________________________________________ Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > > From jim at yorba.org Wed Sep 11 18:42:20 2013 From: jim at yorba.org (Jim Nelson) Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 18:35:20 -0007 Subject: [Shotwell] Lots of video files missing from Shotwell library In-Reply-To: References: <522f7ed8.68f2440a.1637.ffffdd19@mx.google.com> Message-ID: <5230b993.4484440a.1ed8.42ce@mx.google.com> I would recommend backing up your Shotwell database first (it's a good idea to do it occasionally anyway): http://redmine.yorba.org/projects/shotwell/wiki/ShotwellFAQ#How-can-I-back-up-my-Shotwell-library Then, start Shotwell. Your videos should be in the Missing Files item in the left-hand sidebar -- it's near the bottom. Select the videos and choose Edit -> Remove From Library. Once they're removed, you should be able to import them anew. You'll lose whatever metadata you associated with them in Shotwell, but since they're videos, all that probably means is tags and events. Hopefully you can add those back easily enough. -- Jim On mer., sept. 11, 2013 at 6:26 , Thomas Novin wrote: > Hi > Ok, that's nice. > Any suggestion on how I can fix my problem manually? I would really > like to get these 375 files detected. > Rgds//Thomas > > > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 10:19 PM, Jim Nelson wrote: >> >> >> >> It sounds like video files are not being moved out of Missing Files >> when imported. We had an earlier report about that, but now I can >> reproduce this easily. >> I've ticketed it here: http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/7462 >> >> -- Jim >> >> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Thomas Novin >> wrote: >> >>> Hello >>> >>> I have discovered that lots of videos are missing from my library >>> (but not >>> the filesystem). I think this is because I have imported these files >>> before, removed them and then imported them again. Also moving them >>> manually in the filesystem. >>> >>> So now I have the files in my shotwell data dir but they are not in >>> the DB >>> and not detected even though I have watch enabled. >>> >>> What can I do to fix this? They are spread around in different >>> directories >>> so I'm not sure exactly which are missing. >>> >>> I can see in Shotwell that it has 25057 objects in the DB but if I >>> do 'find >>> . -type f | wc -l' in my data-dir I get 25432. So 375 missing. >>> >>> Rgds//Thomas >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Shotwell mailing list >>> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >>> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell >>> > > From thomas at xyz.pp.se Wed Sep 11 21:51:34 2013 From: thomas at xyz.pp.se (Thomas Novin) Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 23:51:34 +0200 Subject: [Shotwell] Lots of video files missing from Shotwell library In-Reply-To: <5230b993.4484440a.1ed8.42ce@mx.google.com> References: <522f7ed8.68f2440a.1637.ffffdd19@mx.google.com> <5230b993.4484440a.1ed8.42ce@mx.google.com> Message-ID: Hello I think I already did that. At least now I have nothing in either Trash or Missing files. Rgds//Thomas On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Jim Nelson wrote: > I would recommend backing up your Shotwell database first (it's a good > idea to do it occasionally anyway): > > > http://redmine.yorba.org/projects/shotwell/wiki/ShotwellFAQ#How-can-I-back-up-my-Shotwell-library > > Then, start Shotwell. Your videos should be in the Missing Files item in > the left-hand sidebar -- it's near the bottom. > > Select the videos and choose Edit -> Remove From Library. > > Once they're removed, you should be able to import them anew. You'll lose > whatever metadata you associated with them in Shotwell, but since they're > videos, all that probably means is tags and events. Hopefully you can add > those back easily enough. > > -- Jim > > On mer., sept. 11, 2013 at 6:26 , Thomas Novin wrote: > > Hi > > Ok, that's nice. > > Any suggestion on how I can fix my problem manually? I would really like > to get these 375 files detected. > > Rgds//Thomas > > > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 10:19 PM, Jim Nelson wrote: > >> It sounds like video files are not being moved out of Missing Files when >> imported. We had an earlier report about that, but now I can reproduce >> this easily. >> >> I've ticketed it here: http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/7462 >> >> -- Jim >> >> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Thomas Novin wrote: >> >> Hello I have discovered that lots of videos are missing from my library >> (but not the filesystem). I think this is because I have imported these >> files before, removed them and then imported them again. Also moving them >> manually in the filesystem. So now I have the files in my shotwell data dir >> but they are not in the DB and not detected even though I have watch >> enabled. What can I do to fix this? They are spread around in different >> directories so I'm not sure exactly which are missing. I can see in >> Shotwell that it has 25057 objects in the DB but if I do 'find . -type f | >> wc -l' in my data-dir I get 25432. So 375 missing. Rgds//Thomas >> _______________________________________________ Shotwell mailing list >> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell >> >> > From mictadlo at gmail.com Fri Sep 13 05:54:27 2013 From: mictadlo at gmail.com (Mic) Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 15:54:27 +1000 Subject: [Shotwell] Depth of field check Message-ID: Hi, I heard that photos contains information which auto focus points were used to take the picture. Any plans to implement a function which allow to see on a picture which auto focus points were used in shotwell? This functionality would help to learn how to avoid next time unsharp pictures? In the meantime, are there any available tools which shows which auto focus point were/was used? Thank you in advance, Mic From jim.sublette at gmail.com Fri Sep 13 15:30:58 2013 From: jim.sublette at gmail.com (Jim Sublette) Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 10:30:58 -0500 Subject: [Shotwell] video thumbnails. Message-ID: I have been doing some testing and have found that video thumbnails work when I use gstreamer-1.0.7. I tested with version 1.0.5 and 1.0.10 and both gave the same error: L 21237 2013-09-12 10:13:32 [WRN] VideoSupport.vala:254: Error creating pixbuf: Unrecognized image file format From onefiftyfour at hotmail.com Fri Sep 13 18:10:39 2013 From: onefiftyfour at hotmail.com (eric L) Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 13:10:39 -0500 Subject: [Shotwell] Depth of field check In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Wow. Thanks! I just did: sudo yum downgrade gstreamer1 gstreamer1-devel gstreamer1-devel-docs started shotwell and video thumbnails are being updated as I type. thrilled. -Eric > Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 15:54:27 +1000 > From: mictadlo at gmail.com > To: shotwell at lists.yorba.org > Subject: [Shotwell] Depth of field check > > Hi, I heard that photos contains information which auto focus points were > used to take the picture. > > Any plans to implement a function which allow to see on a picture which > auto focus points were used in shotwell? > > This functionality would help to learn how to avoid next time unsharp > pictures? > > In the meantime, are there any available tools which shows which auto focus > point were/was used? > > Thank you in advance, > > Mic > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From onefiftyfour at hotmail.com Fri Sep 13 18:14:53 2013 From: onefiftyfour at hotmail.com (eric L) Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 13:14:53 -0500 Subject: [Shotwell] Depth of field check In-Reply-To: References: , Message-ID: sorry. replied to the wrong thread. > From: onefiftyfour at hotmail.com > To: shotwell at lists.yorba.org > Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 13:10:39 -0500 > Subject: Re: [Shotwell] Depth of field check > > Wow. Thanks! > > I just did: > sudo yum downgrade gstreamer1 gstreamer1-devel gstreamer1-devel-docs > > started shotwell and video thumbnails are being updated as I type. > > thrilled. > -Eric > > > Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 15:54:27 +1000 > > From: mictadlo at gmail.com > > To: shotwell at lists.yorba.org > > Subject: [Shotwell] Depth of field check > > > > Hi, I heard that photos contains information which auto focus points were > > used to take the picture. > > > > Any plans to implement a function which allow to see on a picture which > > auto focus points were used in shotwell? > > > > This functionality would help to learn how to avoid next time unsharp > > pictures? > > > > In the meantime, are there any available tools which shows which auto focus > > point were/was used? > > > > Thank you in advance, > > > > Mic > > _______________________________________________ > > Shotwell mailing list > > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From jim at yorba.org Fri Sep 13 20:04:28 2013 From: jim at yorba.org (Jim Nelson) Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 19:57:28 -0007 Subject: [Shotwell] Depth of field check In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <52336fcb.09dd440a.6a81.ffffdc88@mx.google.com> There's no plans at this time to offer this information in a graphical way to the user. I'm not even familiar with how that information is stored; is there a standard metadata field, or is this done via MakerNotes (or another mechanism)? -- Jim On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Mic wrote: > Hi, I heard that photos contains information which auto focus points > were > used to take the picture. > > Any plans to implement a function which allow to see on a picture > which > auto focus points were used in shotwell? > > This functionality would help to learn how to avoid next time unsharp > pictures? > > In the meantime, are there any available tools which shows which auto > focus > point were/was used? > > Thank you in advance, > > Mic > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > From jim at yorba.org Fri Sep 13 20:04:58 2013 From: jim at yorba.org (Jim Nelson) Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 19:57:58 -0007 Subject: [Shotwell] video thumbnails. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <52336fe9.05c3440a.04b7.ffffd4e1@mx.google.com> That's great news. What kind of videos are you attempting to thumbnail? -- Jim On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Jim Sublette wrote: > I have been doing some testing and have found that video thumbnails > work > when I use gstreamer-1.0.7. I tested with version 1.0.5 and 1.0.10 > and > both gave the same error: > > L 21237 2013-09-12 10:13:32 [WRN] VideoSupport.vala:254: Error > creating > pixbuf: Unrecognized image file format > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > From jim.sublette at gmail.com Fri Sep 13 22:44:03 2013 From: jim.sublette at gmail.com (Jim Sublette) Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 17:44:03 -0500 Subject: [Shotwell] video thumbnails. In-Reply-To: <52336fe9.05c3440a.04b7.ffffd4e1@mx.google.com> References: <52336fe9.05c3440a.04b7.ffffd4e1@mx.google.com> Message-ID: The videos are typically 10 minutes or less. On any given event we will typically have photos and videos to download from our Sony CyberShot. The Videos are H.264 video and mpeg-4 aac audio format. On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Jim Nelson wrote: > That's great news. What kind of videos are you attempting to thumbnail? > > -- Jim > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Jim Sublette > wrote: > > I have been doing some testing and have found that video thumbnails work > when I use gstreamer-1.0.7. I tested with version 1.0.5 and 1.0.10 and both > gave the same error: L 21237 2013-09-12 10:13:32 [WRN] > VideoSupport.vala:254: Error creating pixbuf: Unrecognized image file > format _______________________________________________ Shotwell mailing > list Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > > From thomas at xyz.pp.se Sat Sep 14 18:35:06 2013 From: thomas at xyz.pp.se (Thomas Novin) Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2013 20:35:06 +0200 Subject: [Shotwell] video thumbnails. In-Reply-To: References: <52336fe9.05c3440a.04b7.ffffd4e1@mx.google.com> Message-ID: That is the same type of videos that I've had problems with (with the grey thumbnails, see my thread with subject "[Shotwell] Re-create certain thumbnail"). I have added the gstreamer ppa (ppa:gstreamer-developers/ppa) and got upgraded to 1.0.8-1~ubuntu13.04.1~ppa1. How can I delete these bad thumbnails and re-create them? I have ~ 25k objects in my db and would like to avoid to re-create for all of them. Rgds//Thomas On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 12:44 AM, Jim Sublette wrote: > The videos are typically 10 minutes or less. On any given event we will > typically have photos and videos to download from our Sony CyberShot. The > Videos are H.264 video and mpeg-4 aac audio format. > > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Jim Nelson wrote: > > > That's great news. What kind of videos are you attempting to thumbnail? > > > > -- Jim > > > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Jim Sublette > > wrote: > > > > I have been doing some testing and have found that video thumbnails work > > when I use gstreamer-1.0.7. I tested with version 1.0.5 and 1.0.10 and > both > > gave the same error: L 21237 2013-09-12 10:13:32 [WRN] > > VideoSupport.vala:254: Error creating pixbuf: Unrecognized image file > > format _______________________________________________ Shotwell mailing > > list Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > From thomas at xyz.pp.se Sat Sep 14 18:58:28 2013 From: thomas at xyz.pp.se (Thomas Novin) Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2013 20:58:28 +0200 Subject: [Shotwell] video thumbnails. In-Reply-To: References: <52336fe9.05c3440a.04b7.ffffd4e1@mx.google.com> Message-ID: That was not a good idea, now Shotwell doesn't generate any thumbnails at all for my newly imported mp4's. My log was spammed with these lines when restarting: L 11597 2013-09-14 20:54:48 [WRN] VideoSupport.vala:254: Error creating pixbuf: Unrecognized image file format $ grep Unrecognized ~/.cache/shotwell/shotwell.log | wc -l 819 Why doesn't that error write out which filename is in question..? But, since I know that my latest import doesn't have any thumbnails I know it is at least these type of files: $ avprobe "2013-09-14 15.43.42.mp4" avprobe version 0.8.6-6:0.8.6-1ubuntu2, Copyright (c) 2007-2013 the Libav developers built on Mar 30 2013 22:23:21 with gcc 4.7.2 Input #0, mov,mp4,m4a,3gp,3g2,mj2, from '2013-09-14 15.43.42.mp4': Metadata: major_brand : isom minor_version : 0 compatible_brands: isom3gp4 creation_time : 2013-09-14 13:43:42 Duration: 00:00:39.70, start: 0.000000, bitrate: 17412 kb/s Stream #0.0(eng): Video: h264 (High), yuv420p, 1920x1080, 17333 kb/s, PAR 65536:65536 DAR 16:9, 29.69 fps, 90k tbr, 90k tbn, 180k tbc Metadata: creation_time : 2013-09-14 13:43:42 Stream #0.1(eng): Audio: aac, 48000 Hz, stereo, s16, 128 kb/s Metadata: creation_time : 2013-09-14 13:43:42 Rgds//Thomas On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Thomas Novin wrote: > That is the same type of videos that I've had problems with (with the grey > thumbnails, see my thread with subject "[Shotwell] Re-create certain > thumbnail"). > > I have added the gstreamer ppa (ppa:gstreamer-developers/ppa) and got > upgraded to 1.0.8-1~ubuntu13.04.1~ppa1. > > How can I delete these bad thumbnails and re-create them? I have ~ 25k > objects in my db and would like to avoid to re-create for all of them. > > Rgds//Thomas > > > On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 12:44 AM, Jim Sublette wrote: > >> The videos are typically 10 minutes or less. On any given event we will >> typically have photos and videos to download from our Sony CyberShot. The >> Videos are H.264 video and mpeg-4 aac audio format. >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Jim Nelson wrote: >> >> > That's great news. What kind of videos are you attempting to thumbnail? >> > >> > -- Jim >> > >> > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Jim Sublette >> > wrote: >> > >> > I have been doing some testing and have found that video thumbnails work >> > when I use gstreamer-1.0.7. I tested with version 1.0.5 and 1.0.10 and >> both >> > gave the same error: L 21237 2013-09-12 10:13:32 [WRN] >> > VideoSupport.vala:254: Error creating pixbuf: Unrecognized image file >> > format _______________________________________________ Shotwell mailing >> > list Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >> > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> Shotwell mailing list >> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell >> > > From jim at yorba.org Fri Sep 20 00:15:27 2013 From: jim at yorba.org (Jim Nelson) Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 00:08:27 -0007 Subject: [Shotwell] video thumbnails. In-Reply-To: References: <52336fe9.05c3440a.04b7.ffffd4e1@mx.google.com> Message-ID: <523b9394.6cf5420a.4bd5.ffffed00@mx.google.com> I've patched Shotwell today with the recommended changes from the gstreamer guys (bpp and depth parameters removed). Please let me know if that solves your problems. -- Jim On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Thomas Novin wrote: > That was not a good idea, now Shotwell doesn't generate any > thumbnails at > all for my newly imported mp4's. > > My log was spammed with these lines when restarting: > > L 11597 2013-09-14 20:54:48 [WRN] VideoSupport.vala:254: Error > creating > pixbuf: Unrecognized image file format > > $ grep Unrecognized ~/.cache/shotwell/shotwell.log | wc -l > 819 > > Why doesn't that error write out which filename is in question..? > > But, since I know that my latest import doesn't have any thumbnails I > know > it is at least these type of files: > > $ avprobe "2013-09-14 15.43.42.mp4" > avprobe version 0.8.6-6:0.8.6-1ubuntu2, Copyright (c) 2007-2013 the > Libav > developers > built on Mar 30 2013 22:23:21 with gcc 4.7.2 > Input #0, mov,mp4,m4a,3gp,3g2,mj2, from '2013-09-14 15.43.42.mp4': > Metadata: > major_brand : isom > minor_version : 0 > compatible_brands: isom3gp4 > creation_time : 2013-09-14 13:43:42 > Duration: 00:00:39.70, start: 0.000000, bitrate: 17412 kb/s > Stream #0.0(eng): Video: h264 (High), yuv420p, 1920x1080, 17333 > kb/s, > PAR 65536:65536 DAR 16:9, 29.69 fps, 90k tbr, 90k tbn, 180k tbc > Metadata: > creation_time : 2013-09-14 13:43:42 > Stream #0.1(eng): Audio: aac, 48000 Hz, stereo, s16, 128 kb/s > Metadata: > creation_time : 2013-09-14 13:43:42 > > > Rgds//Thomas > > > On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Thomas Novin > wrote: > >> That is the same type of videos that I've had problems with (with >> the grey >> thumbnails, see my thread with subject "[Shotwell] Re-create certain >> thumbnail"). >> >> I have added the gstreamer ppa (ppa:gstreamer-developers/ppa) and >> got >> upgraded to 1.0.8-1~ubuntu13.04.1~ppa1. >> >> How can I delete these bad thumbnails and re-create them? I have ~ >> 25k >> objects in my db and would like to avoid to re-create for all of >> them. >> >> Rgds//Thomas >> >> >> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 12:44 AM, Jim Sublette >> wrote: >> >>> The videos are typically 10 minutes or less. On any given event >>> we will >>> typically have photos and videos to download from our Sony >>> CyberShot. The >>> Videos are H.264 video and mpeg-4 aac audio format. >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Jim Nelson wrote: >>> >>> > That's great news. What kind of videos are you attempting to >>> thumbnail? >>> > >>> > -- Jim >>> > >>> > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Jim Sublette >>> >>> > wrote: >>> > >>> > I have been doing some testing and have found that video >>> thumbnails work >>> > when I use gstreamer-1.0.7. I tested with version 1.0.5 and >>> 1.0.10 and >>> both >>> > gave the same error: L 21237 2013-09-12 10:13:32 [WRN] >>> > VideoSupport.vala:254: Error creating pixbuf: Unrecognized image >>> file >>> > format _______________________________________________ Shotwell >>> mailing >>> > list Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >>> > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Shotwell mailing list >>> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >>> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell >>> >>> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > From juliette.tux at gmail.com Fri Sep 20 11:28:56 2013 From: juliette.tux at gmail.com (Juliette Tux) Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 15:28:56 +0400 Subject: [Shotwell] Missing strings in Russian translation In-Reply-To: <522f71e4.2683420a.1664.fffff5a0@mx.google.com> References: <522f71e4.2683420a.1664.fffff5a0@mx.google.com> Message-ID: Hello gentlemen, I'm sorry to bother you again on the same issue, but the Redmine ticket was closed with the comment "I think the reporter on the mailing list was using new code against an old .pot file." Ok, fine. But the new .pots are nowhere to be found. Both tar archives for 0.14.0 and 0.14.1 from the download page contain the same old .pots from 2013-02-25 (for core and for extras), the same ones which are present on the source code tree which I git cloned recently to double check. The .po files in the source tree are still old and partially unstranslated and we have 100% Russian translation on the Transifex. I'm not asking to update them urgently right now, ok no problem. But forgive me if I say again: no one of the .pots present in my git cloned source code tree contain these strings or at least my Lokalize does not see them: 'URL of your Piwigo photo library' 'User name' 'Remember password' http://tau.rghost.ru/48855575/image.png And I see no Messages.sh or any other script (potgen-shotwell ?) which can be used to refresh the .pot against new sources without bothering the developers. May be I'm missing something since you guys said you double-checked it and everything was just fine so kindly please point me to the weakest link in my logic. I'm just a humble translator and I'm always willing to learn and to know something new. Thank you! On 10 September 2013 23:24, Jim Nelson wrote: > Thanks for reporting this. It appears there's a problem in the script > file that generates the .pot files. We'll get this fixed for the 0.15 > release. I've ticketed it here: http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/7459 > > -- Jim > > > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Juliette Tux > wrote: > > Hello, Could somebody please check the .pot and Russian .po for Shoptwell > translation on https://www.transifex.com/projects/p/shotwell/ against the > source code files? The Transifex translation is 100% complete but we've > found some not translated strings in the version 0.14.1-1 ( > https://abf.rosalinux.ru/build_lists/1220283 ) See screenshot here: > http://rghost.ru/48677006/image.png > -- > best regards, Julia Dronova > _______________________________________________ Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > > -- ? ?????????, ??????? ???? From jim at yorba.org Fri Sep 20 18:21:34 2013 From: jim at yorba.org (Jim Nelson) Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 18:14:34 -0007 Subject: [Shotwell] Missing strings in Russian translation In-Reply-To: References: <522f71e4.2683420a.1664.fffff5a0@mx.google.com> Message-ID: <523c9225.6175420a.4918.1327@mx.google.com> I could've been more explicit on the ticket, my mistake. Today is string freeze for Yorba. Later today I will be posting new .pot files for both Shotwell and Geary on Transifex. I double-checked by doing a dry run yesterday, the strings you listed will be present in the new .pot file. As far as generating the .pot file, alas, in Shotwell we use a non-distributed script files to generate the strings. That's caused some trouble in the past, and now it's causing trouble again. I think this is something we should remedy, maybe even in this release, so I've ticketed this at http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/7526 -- Jim On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 4:28 AM, Juliette Tux wrote: > Hello gentlemen,I'm sorry to bother you again on the same issue, but > the Redmine ticket was closed with the comment "I think the reporter > on the mailing list was using new code against an old .pot file." Ok, > fine. But the new .pots are nowhere to be found. Both tar archives > for 0.14.0 and 0.14.1 from the download page contain the same old > .pots from 2013-02-25 (for core and for extras), the same ones which > are present on the source code tree which I git cloned recently to > double check. The .po files in the source tree are still old and > partially unstranslated and we have 100% Russian translation on the > Transifex. I'm not asking to update them urgently right now, ok no > problem. But forgive me if I say again: no one of the .pots present > in my git cloned source code tree contain these strings or at least > my Lokalize does not see them: > > 'URL of your Piwigo photo library''User name''Remember password' > http://tau.rghost.ru/48855575/image.png > > > And I see no Messages.sh or any other script (potgen-shotwell ?) > which can be used to refresh the .pot against new sources without > bothering the developers.May be I'm missing something since you guys > said you double-checked it and everything was just fine so kindly > please point me to the weakest link in my logic. > I'm just a humble translator and I'm always willing to learn and to > know something new. Thank you! > > On 10 September 2013 23:24, Jim Nelson wrote: > >> >> >> Thanks for reporting this. It appears there's a problem in the >> script file that generates the .pot files. We'll get this fixed for >> the 0.15 release. I've ticketed it here: >> http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/7459 >> >> -- Jim >> >> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Juliette Tux >> wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> Could somebody please check the .pot and Russian .po for Shoptwell >>> translation on https://www.transifex.com/projects/p/shotwell/ >>> against the >>> source code files? The Transifex translation is 100% complete but >>> we've >>> found some not translated strings in the version 0.14.1-1 ( >>> https://abf.rosalinux.ru/build_lists/1220283 ) See screenshot here: >>> http://rghost.ru/48677006/image.png >>> >>> -- >>> best regards, >>> Julia Dronova >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Shotwell mailing list >>> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >>> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell >>> > > > -- > ? ?????????, ??????? ???? > > From jim at yorba.org Fri Sep 20 21:46:59 2013 From: jim at yorba.org (Jim Nelson) Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 21:39:59 -0007 Subject: [Shotwell] Shotwell 0.15 translations requested Message-ID: <523cc247.68f2440a.05bf.ffffce12@mx.google.com> Hello again! Shotwell 0.15 is almost ready for delivery. The list of new features and improvements include: * HIghlights color adjustments (a complement to the Shadows adjustment)* Improved crop tool* Copy and paste color adjustments between photos* Assorted bug fixes and improvements Yorba's goal is to make Shotwell available to everyone worldwide, and we can use your help! We need translations by Tuesday, 1 October for them to be included in the upcoming release. Fortunately most of the strings from the last release remain unchanged. However, please check over existing strings, especially date specifiers! If you speak English and another language, you can help by going to the Shotwell project page on Transifex and translating the remaining strings: https://www.transifex.com/projects/p/shotwell/ If you have any questions about any of the strings, please email shotwell at yorba.org and we'll do our best to help out. Thanks! -- Jim Nelson From thomas at xyz.pp.se Mon Sep 23 10:25:42 2013 From: thomas at xyz.pp.se (Thomas Novin) Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 12:25:42 +0200 Subject: [Shotwell] video thumbnails. In-Reply-To: <523b9394.6cf5420a.4bd5.ffffed00@mx.google.com> References: <52336fe9.05c3440a.04b7.ffffd4e1@mx.google.com> <523b9394.6cf5420a.4bd5.ffffed00@mx.google.com> Message-ID: Ok, I'll try it as soon as 0.15 has been released. A generate new thumbnail'-option would be nice.. but since that does not exist, do I have to remove all of them and have them re-created? So approx. 30k thumbnails in my case. Rgds//Thomas On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 2:15 AM, Jim Nelson wrote: > I've patched Shotwell today with the recommended changes from the > gstreamer guys (bpp and depth parameters removed). Please let me know if > that solves your problems. > > -- Jim > > On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Thomas Novin wrote: > > That was not a good idea, now Shotwell doesn't generate any thumbnails at > all for my newly imported mp4's. My log was spammed with these lines when > restarting: L 11597 2013-09-14 20:54:48 [WRN] VideoSupport.vala:254: Error > creating pixbuf: Unrecognized image file format $ grep Unrecognized > ~/.cache/shotwell/shotwell.log | wc -l 819 Why doesn't that error write out > which filename is in question..? But, since I know that my latest import > doesn't have any thumbnails I know it is at least these type of files: $ > avprobe "2013-09-14 15.43.42.mp4" avprobe version 0.8.6-6:0.8.6-1ubuntu2, > Copyright (c) 2007-2013 the Libav developers built on Mar 30 2013 22:23:21 > with gcc 4.7.2 Input #0, mov,mp4,m4a,3gp,3g2,mj2, from '2013-09-14 > 15.43.42.mp4': Metadata: major_brand : isom minor_version : 0 > compatible_brands: isom3gp4 creation_time : 2013-09-14 13:43:42 Duration: > 00:00:39.70, start: 0.000000, bitrate: 17412 kb/s Stream #0.0(eng): Video: > h264 (High), yuv420p, 1920x1080, 17333 kb/s, PAR 65536:65536 DAR 16:9, > 29.69 fps, 90k tbr, 90k tbn, 180k tbc Metadata: creation_time : 2013-09-14 > 13:43:42 Stream #0.1(eng): Audio: aac, 48000 Hz, stereo, s16, 128 kb/s > Metadata: creation_time : 2013-09-14 13:43:42 Rgds//Thomas On Sat, Sep 14, > 2013 at 8:35 PM, Thomas Novin wrote: > > That is the same type of videos that I've had problems with (with the grey > thumbnails, see my thread with subject "[Shotwell] Re-create certain > thumbnail"). I have added the gstreamer ppa (ppa:gstreamer-developers/ppa) > and got upgraded to 1.0.8-1~ubuntu13.04.1~ppa1. How can I delete these bad > thumbnails and re-create them? I have ~ 25k objects in my db and would like > to avoid to re-create for all of them. Rgds//Thomas On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at > 12:44 AM, Jim Sublette wrote: > > The videos are typically 10 minutes or less. On any given event we will > typically have photos and videos to download from our Sony CyberShot. The > Videos are H.264 video and mpeg-4 aac audio format. On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at > 3:04 PM, Jim Nelson wrote: > That's great news. What kind > of videos are you attempting to thumbnail? > > -- Jim > > On Fri, Sep 13, > 2013 at 8:30 AM, Jim Sublette > wrote: > > I > have been doing some testing and have found that video thumbnails work > > when I use gstreamer-1.0.7. I tested with version 1.0.5 and 1.0.10 and both > > gave the same error: L 21237 2013-09-12 10:13:32 [WRN] > > VideoSupport.vala:254: Error creating pixbuf: Unrecognized image file > > format _______________________________________________ Shotwell mailing > > list Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > > > _______________________________________________ Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > > _______________________________________________ Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > > From avkaplmkt at gmail.com Mon Sep 23 14:19:48 2013 From: avkaplmkt at gmail.com (Advrk Aplmrkt) Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 22:19:48 +0800 Subject: [Shotwell] Shotwell 0.14.1 SELinux import problem in virtual Fedora 19 Message-ID: Hello, I am running the latest Shotwell 0.14.1 in a VirtualBox 4.3.0_BETA Fedora 19 virtual machine that is fully updated. Today I was trying to import photos from a VirtualBox shared folder to another which contains my Shotwell library. I got a series of errors: Import Results Report (Shotwell 0.14.1 @ 2013-09-23T13:59:01.838399Z) Attempted to import 56 files. Of these, 0 files were successfully imported. Photos/Videos Not Imported for Other Reasons: /home/[username]/temp/Ciara visit 2013-03/DSC_6967.JPG error message: Error setting extended attribute 'security.selinux': Operation not supported /home/[username]/temp/Ciara visit 2013-03/DSC_6970.AVI error message: Error setting extended attribute 'security.selinux': Operation not supported .......... I know my SELinux policy is currently set to permissive. Does anyone have any idea how to alleviate this problem??? Thanks!! From jim at yorba.org Mon Sep 23 18:20:15 2013 From: jim at yorba.org (Jim Nelson) Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 18:13:15 -0007 Subject: [Shotwell] Call for translations: Shotwell 0.15 Message-ID: <5240864f.230f430a.08a1.ffffb78c@mx.google.com> Hello all, Shotwell 0.15 is almost ready for delivery. The list of new features and improvements include: * HIghlights color adjustments (a complement to the Shadows adjustment)* Improved crop tool* Copy and paste color adjustments between photos* Assorted bug fixes and improvements Yorba's goal is to make Shotwell available to everyone worldwide, and we can use your help! We need translations by Tuesday, 1 October for them to be included in the upcoming release. Fortunately most of the strings from the last release remain unchanged. However, please check over existing strings, especially date specifiers! Please visit our Shotwell page on Transifex: https://www.transifex.com/projects/p/shotwell/ If you have any questions about any of the strings, please email shotwell at yorba.org and we'll do our best to help out. Thanks! -- Jim Nelson From xavierviader at gmail.com Tue Sep 24 08:55:50 2013 From: xavierviader at gmail.com (Xavi) Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 10:55:50 +0200 Subject: [Shotwell] Force lang UI Message-ID: <52415396.4080702@gmail.com> Hi all, I'm using shotwell 0.12.3 as I'm base on Debian Wheezy. Because a problem with UI using Catalan language I've tried to install 0.14 and lang works but I've got collateral effects in other packages. Is there any way to force shotwell to use other system languages (of course installed on the system)? Thanks Xavi From jim at yorba.org Tue Sep 24 20:04:43 2013 From: jim at yorba.org (Jim Nelson) Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 19:57:43 -0007 Subject: [Shotwell] Force lang UI In-Reply-To: <52415396.4080702@gmail.com> References: <52415396.4080702@gmail.com> Message-ID: <5241f04a.6cf5420a.4bd5.443e@mx.google.com> I believe running Shotwell like this will work: $ LANGUAGE=es_CU shotwell (or whatever language code you desire). -- Jim On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 1:55 AM, Xavi wrote: > Hi all, > I'm using shotwell 0.12.3 as I'm base on Debian Wheezy. Because a > problem with UI using Catalan language I've tried to install 0.14 and > lang works but I've got collateral effects in other packages. Is > there any way to force shotwell to use other system languages (of > course installed on the system)? > > Thanks > > Xavi > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From xavierviader at gmail.com Thu Sep 26 17:44:34 2013 From: xavierviader at gmail.com (Xavi) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 19:44:34 +0200 Subject: [Shotwell] Force lang UI In-Reply-To: <5241f04a.6cf5420a.4bd5.443e@mx.google.com> References: <52415396.4080702@gmail.com> <5241f04a.6cf5420a.4bd5.443e@mx.google.com> Message-ID: <52447282.7020502@gmail.com> That's exactly what I needed. Thanks a lot Xavi Al 24/09/13 22:04, En/na Jim Nelson ha escrit: > I believe running Shotwell like this will work: > > $ LANGUAGE=es_CU shotwell > > (or whatever language code you desire). > > -- Jim > > On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 1:55 AM, Xavi wrote: >> Hi all, I'm using shotwell 0.12.3 as I'm base on Debian Wheezy. >> Because a problem with UI using Catalan language I've tried to >> install 0.14 and lang works but I've got collateral effects in other >> packages. Is there any way to force shotwell to use other system >> languages (of course installed on the system)? Thanks Xavi >> _______________________________________________ Shotwell mailing list >> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From shotwell at svenningsen.dk Thu Sep 26 17:59:33 2013 From: shotwell at svenningsen.dk (Rikard Svenningsen) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 19:59:33 +0200 Subject: [Shotwell] Fuji .RAF and Canon .CR2 different speed and thumbnail creation In-Reply-To: References: <5192a2bd.e7e1440a.5476.4513@mx.google.com> <51ADE7DA.3040908@gmail.com> Message-ID: Hi All About the RAF file format. I am not using the Shotwell in that context. I am not importing. I just copy from the card both RAF and JPG to my network location. I use the Shotwell to convert to TIFF or JPG. I didn't know that shotwell is not "converting" to JPG but just fetch the embedded JPG file out of the RAF file or did I misunderstand that? When I compare the camera JPG and the RAF picture I find more or less the same quality so I do expect the Shotwell to make the best quality to TIFF file or what? Today I took a picture of sunrise, the original JPG file was wrong to much light on the RAF picture was more correct in respect to what I actually saw on the sky. So I am a little confused By the way I have a Fuji HS20EXR. 2013/6/4 jhoran > Joseph Bylund writes: > > > > > On 06/04/2013 08:37 AM, jhoran wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Additional comments: > > > > > > I guess that Shotwell use dcraw to extract the embeded JPG in the raw > file > > > in order to generate the thumb. > > > In my case, Shotwell cannot generate the thumb for RAF file of Fuji > X100S > > > because the latest dcraw stable release does not support this camera. > > > > > > I noticed that Libraw 0.15.2 can handle the Fuji X100S RAF file > correctly. > > > > > > One nice feature would be to let the user to configure the command > line to > > > extract the JPG from the RAW file. That would let freedom to the user > to use > > > whatever raw extracter he/she wants. Fotoxx does that. > > > > > > In my particular case I would use dcraw_emu from Libraw and everything > would > > > work perfectly. > > > > > > Hope it helps someone. > > > > > > Jhoran > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Shotwell mailing list > > > Shotwell at ... > > > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > > Jhoran, > > > > Shotwell actually uses libraw behind the scenes (which I believe dcraw > > does as well). Which version of libraw is your shotwell linked > > against? I'll grab a X100S raw file and test. > > > > You can actually "trick" shotwell into using a thumbnail you specify, if > > you import as a raw+jpg. To do this you need to generate the jpg before > > import and the basenames need to be the same (with the proper > extensions). > > > > hope that helps,, > > -Joe > > > > Hi Joe, > > Thanks for your reply. > > I use Shotwell 0.14.1 from Ubuntu 13.04 ; this is linked with libraw 0.14 > which does not support X100S (according to libraw website). > > My understanding is that libraw reuse some dcraw code, according to libraw > website. they claim to "get a library based on dcraw, only better". > > I would appreciate if you could elaborate on this 'trick'. I actually shoot > JPG+RAW and viewing only one thumbnail for the pair would be perfect. How > can you do that ? > How to avoid Shotwell parsing the raw file ? > > Jhoran > > > > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > From thomas at xyz.pp.se Mon Sep 30 16:53:26 2013 From: thomas at xyz.pp.se (Thomas Novin) Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 18:53:26 +0200 Subject: [Shotwell] Shotwell import failed with 0.15pr3 Message-ID: Hello Upgraded to Ubuntu 13.10 that has Shotwell 0.15pr3. My first import failed. Sadly I did not save the log but I ran it again and I got a similar error. http://paste.ubuntu.com/6176271/ According to Shotwell, only a couple of the photos/videos were imported. But really, all the photos are in the right directories at the destination. /media/mistik_shared/Photos is my directory set in Shotwell prefs. All files has actually been copied twice to the destination now I see so the check for duplicates has failed as well. thnov at thnov-desktop:/media/mistik_shared/Photos/2013/09-30$ ls -al total 682236 drwxr-xr-x 2 thnov 128 4096 sep 30 18:47 . drwxrwxr-x 252 thnov 128 4096 sep 30 18:39 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 thnov 128 3932160 sep 30 11:41 P1030582_1.JPG -rw-r--r-- 1 thnov 128 3932160 sep 30 11:41 P1030582.JPG -rw-r--r-- 1 thnov 128 4175872 sep 30 11:41 P1030583_1.JPG -rw-r--r-- 1 thnov 128 4175872 sep 30 11:41 P1030583.JPG Rgds//Thomas From thomas at xyz.pp.se Mon Sep 30 17:12:35 2013 From: thomas at xyz.pp.se (Thomas Novin) Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 19:12:35 +0200 Subject: [Shotwell] Shotwell import failed with 0.15pr3 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: All the files that was copied the first import http://paste.ubuntu.com/6176323/ And all the duplicates http://paste.ubuntu.com/6176354/ Maybe the error in the log file is incorrect, the path is written wrong in the log. Because Shotwell has tried to change the group which I cannot do on these files, I think that's the problem here. thnov at thnov-desktop:~/shared/Photos/2013/09-30$ chgrp sambashare P1030588_1.JPG chgrp: changing group of ?P1030588_1.JPG?: Operation not permitted So because Shotwell fails to set the group, it thinks the copy operation has failed and then writes a log error which incorrectly states it's trying to copy the file to itself. Photos/Videos Not Imported Because Shotwell Couldn't Copy Them into its Library: couldn't copy /home/thnov/Desktop/DCIM/103_PANA/P1030542.JPG to /home/thnov/Desktop/DCIM/103_PANA/P1030542.JPG error message: Error setting owner: Operation not permitted Rgds//Thomas On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Thomas Novin wrote: > Hello > > Upgraded to Ubuntu 13.10 that has Shotwell 0.15pr3. My first import > failed. Sadly I did not save the log but I ran it again and I got a similar > error. > > http://paste.ubuntu.com/6176271/ > > According to Shotwell, only a couple of the photos/videos were imported. > But really, all the photos are in the right directories at the destination. > > /media/mistik_shared/Photos is my directory set in Shotwell prefs. > > All files has actually been copied twice to the destination now I see so > the check for duplicates has failed as well. > > thnov at thnov-desktop:/media/mistik_shared/Photos/2013/09-30$ ls -al > total 682236 > drwxr-xr-x 2 thnov 128 4096 sep 30 18:47 . > drwxrwxr-x 252 thnov 128 4096 sep 30 18:39 .. > -rw-r--r-- 1 thnov 128 3932160 sep 30 11:41 P1030582_1.JPG > -rw-r--r-- 1 thnov 128 3932160 sep 30 11:41 P1030582.JPG > -rw-r--r-- 1 thnov 128 4175872 sep 30 11:41 P1030583_1.JPG > -rw-r--r-- 1 thnov 128 4175872 sep 30 11:41 P1030583.JPG > > > Rgds//Thomas > > From thomas at xyz.pp.se Mon Sep 30 21:21:57 2013 From: thomas at xyz.pp.se (Thomas Novin) Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 23:21:57 +0200 Subject: [Shotwell] Shotwell import failed with 0.15pr3 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Ok I got the situation sorted, kind of. I was able to confirm that 100% of the items I had on my Desktop had been transferred to the datastore, sometimes twice with _1 added to the filenames. Shotwell automatically added the remaining to the library, sometimes the originals and sometimes the _1-files. I removed all the _1-files manually and maybe 50% disappeared from the library. Then removed them from missing files. Now the library is stable, watch does not find any new items but the 50% I manually deleted won't get re-added again. This is similar to another mail thread I have on this ML, with lots of items missing in my Shotwell DB but which are present in the datastore. Rgds//Thomas On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 7:12 PM, Thomas Novin wrote: > All the files that was copied the first import > > http://paste.ubuntu.com/6176323/ > > And all the duplicates > > http://paste.ubuntu.com/6176354/ > > Maybe the error in the log file is incorrect, the path is written wrong in > the log. Because Shotwell has tried to change the group which I cannot do > on these files, I think that's the problem here. > > thnov at thnov-desktop:~/shared/Photos/2013/09-30$ chgrp sambashare > P1030588_1.JPG > chgrp: changing group of ?P1030588_1.JPG?: Operation not permitted > > So because Shotwell fails to set the group, it thinks the copy operation > has failed and then writes a log error which incorrectly states it's trying > to copy the file to itself. > > Photos/Videos Not Imported Because Shotwell Couldn't Copy Them into its > Library: > > couldn't copy /home/thnov/Desktop/DCIM/103_PANA/P1030542.JPG > to /home/thnov/Desktop/DCIM/103_PANA/P1030542.JPG > error message: Error setting owner: Operation not permitted > > Rgds//Thomas > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Thomas Novin wrote: > >> Hello >> >> Upgraded to Ubuntu 13.10 that has Shotwell 0.15pr3. My first import >> failed. Sadly I did not save the log but I ran it again and I got a similar >> error. >> >> http://paste.ubuntu.com/6176271/ >> >> According to Shotwell, only a couple of the photos/videos were imported. >> But really, all the photos are in the right directories at the destination. >> >> /media/mistik_shared/Photos is my directory set in Shotwell prefs. >> >> All files has actually been copied twice to the destination now I see so >> the check for duplicates has failed as well. >> >> thnov at thnov-desktop:/media/mistik_shared/Photos/2013/09-30$ ls -al >> total 682236 >> drwxr-xr-x 2 thnov 128 4096 sep 30 18:47 . >> drwxrwxr-x 252 thnov 128 4096 sep 30 18:39 .. >> -rw-r--r-- 1 thnov 128 3932160 sep 30 11:41 P1030582_1.JPG >> -rw-r--r-- 1 thnov 128 3932160 sep 30 11:41 P1030582.JPG >> -rw-r--r-- 1 thnov 128 4175872 sep 30 11:41 P1030583_1.JPG >> -rw-r--r-- 1 thnov 128 4175872 sep 30 11:41 P1030583.JPG >> >> >> Rgds//Thomas >> >> > From thomas at xyz.pp.se Mon Sep 30 21:35:07 2013 From: thomas at xyz.pp.se (Thomas Novin) Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 23:35:07 +0200 Subject: [Shotwell] Shotwell import failed with 0.15pr3 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: One new import, all 93 items failed but all got copied. All 93 items were later auto-added to the library because of watch. http://paste.ubuntu.com/6177355/ This must be a regression since 0.14.x. Rgds//Thomas On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Thomas Novin wrote: > Ok I got the situation sorted, kind of. I was able to confirm that 100% of > the items I had on my Desktop had been transferred to the datastore, > sometimes twice with _1 added to the filenames. Shotwell automatically > added the remaining to the library, sometimes the originals and sometimes > the _1-files. > > I removed all the _1-files manually and maybe 50% disappeared from the > library. > > Then removed them from missing files. > > Now the library is stable, watch does not find any new items but the 50% I > manually deleted won't get re-added again. This is similar to another mail > thread I have on this ML, with lots of items missing in my Shotwell DB but > which are present in the datastore. > > Rgds//Thomas > > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 7:12 PM, Thomas Novin wrote: > >> All the files that was copied the first import >> >> http://paste.ubuntu.com/6176323/ >> >> And all the duplicates >> >> http://paste.ubuntu.com/6176354/ >> >> Maybe the error in the log file is incorrect, the path is written wrong >> in the log. Because Shotwell has tried to change the group which I cannot >> do on these files, I think that's the problem here. >> >> thnov at thnov-desktop:~/shared/Photos/2013/09-30$ chgrp sambashare >> P1030588_1.JPG >> chgrp: changing group of ?P1030588_1.JPG?: Operation not permitted >> >> So because Shotwell fails to set the group, it thinks the copy operation >> has failed and then writes a log error which incorrectly states it's trying >> to copy the file to itself. >> >> Photos/Videos Not Imported Because Shotwell Couldn't Copy Them into its >> Library: >> >> couldn't copy /home/thnov/Desktop/DCIM/103_PANA/P1030542.JPG >> to /home/thnov/Desktop/DCIM/103_PANA/P1030542.JPG >> error message: Error setting owner: Operation not permitted >> >> Rgds//Thomas >> >> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Thomas Novin wrote: >> >>> Hello >>> >>> Upgraded to Ubuntu 13.10 that has Shotwell 0.15pr3. My first import >>> failed. Sadly I did not save the log but I ran it again and I got a similar >>> error. >>> >>> http://paste.ubuntu.com/6176271/ >>> >>> According to Shotwell, only a couple of the photos/videos were imported. >>> But really, all the photos are in the right directories at the destination. >>> >>> /media/mistik_shared/Photos is my directory set in Shotwell prefs. >>> >>> All files has actually been copied twice to the destination now I see so >>> the check for duplicates has failed as well. >>> >>> thnov at thnov-desktop:/media/mistik_shared/Photos/2013/09-30$ ls -al >>> total 682236 >>> drwxr-xr-x 2 thnov 128 4096 sep 30 18:47 . >>> drwxrwxr-x 252 thnov 128 4096 sep 30 18:39 .. >>> -rw-r--r-- 1 thnov 128 3932160 sep 30 11:41 P1030582_1.JPG >>> -rw-r--r-- 1 thnov 128 3932160 sep 30 11:41 P1030582.JPG >>> -rw-r--r-- 1 thnov 128 4175872 sep 30 11:41 P1030583_1.JPG >>> -rw-r--r-- 1 thnov 128 4175872 sep 30 11:41 P1030583.JPG >>> >>> >>> Rgds//Thomas >>> >>> >> > From jim at yorba.org Mon Sep 30 21:53:15 2013 From: jim at yorba.org (Jim Nelson) Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 21:46:15 -0007 Subject: [Shotwell] Shotwell import failed with 0.15pr3 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5249f2c9.01ab440a.64b2.ffff95f1@mx.google.com> We had another recent report that sounds suspiciously similar to yours, Thomas: http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/7550 I don't know it's the same problem, but it might be. We've had other problems with network storage in the past, both importing from and copying to. -- Jim On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Thomas Novin wrote: > One new import, all 93 items failed but all got copied. All 93 items > were > later auto-added to the library because of watch. > > http://paste.ubuntu.com/6177355/ > > This must be a regression since 0.14.x. > > Rgds//Thomas > > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Thomas Novin > wrote: > >> Ok I got the situation sorted, kind of. I was able to confirm that >> 100% of >> the items I had on my Desktop had been transferred to the datastore, >> sometimes twice with _1 added to the filenames. Shotwell >> automatically >> added the remaining to the library, sometimes the originals and >> sometimes >> the _1-files. >> >> I removed all the _1-files manually and maybe 50% disappeared from >> the >> library. >> >> Then removed them from missing files. >> >> Now the library is stable, watch does not find any new items but >> the 50% I >> manually deleted won't get re-added again. This is similar to >> another mail >> thread I have on this ML, with lots of items missing in my Shotwell >> DB but >> which are present in the datastore. >> >> Rgds//Thomas >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 7:12 PM, Thomas Novin >> wrote: >> >>> All the files that was copied the first import >>> >>> http://paste.ubuntu.com/6176323/ >>> >>> And all the duplicates >>> >>> http://paste.ubuntu.com/6176354/ >>> >>> Maybe the error in the log file is incorrect, the path is written >>> wrong >>> in the log. Because Shotwell has tried to change the group which I >>> cannot >>> do on these files, I think that's the problem here. >>> >>> thnov at thnov-desktop:~/shared/Photos/2013/09-30$ chgrp sambashare >>> P1030588_1.JPG >>> chgrp: changing group of ?P1030588_1.JPG?: Operation not >>> permitted >>> >>> So because Shotwell fails to set the group, it thinks the copy >>> operation >>> has failed and then writes a log error which incorrectly states >>> it's trying >>> to copy the file to itself. >>> >>> Photos/Videos Not Imported Because Shotwell Couldn't Copy Them >>> into its >>> Library: >>> >>> couldn't copy /home/thnov/Desktop/DCIM/103_PANA/P1030542.JPG >>> to /home/thnov/Desktop/DCIM/103_PANA/P1030542.JPG >>> error message: Error setting owner: Operation not permitted >>> >>> Rgds//Thomas >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Thomas Novin >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hello >>>> >>>> Upgraded to Ubuntu 13.10 that has Shotwell 0.15pr3. My first >>>> import >>>> failed. Sadly I did not save the log but I ran it again and I got >>>> a similar >>>> error. >>>> >>>> http://paste.ubuntu.com/6176271/ >>>> >>>> According to Shotwell, only a couple of the photos/videos were >>>> imported. >>>> But really, all the photos are in the right directories at the >>>> destination. >>>> >>>> /media/mistik_shared/Photos is my directory set in Shotwell prefs. >>>> >>>> All files has actually been copied twice to the destination now I >>>> see so >>>> the check for duplicates has failed as well. >>>> >>>> thnov at thnov-desktop:/media/mistik_shared/Photos/2013/09-30$ ls -al >>>> total 682236 >>>> drwxr-xr-x 2 thnov 128 4096 sep 30 18:47 . >>>> drwxrwxr-x 252 thnov 128 4096 sep 30 18:39 .. >>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 thnov 128 3932160 sep 30 11:41 P1030582_1.JPG >>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 thnov 128 3932160 sep 30 11:41 P1030582.JPG >>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 thnov 128 4175872 sep 30 11:41 P1030583_1.JPG >>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 thnov 128 4175872 sep 30 11:41 P1030583.JPG >>>> >>>> >>>> Rgds//Thomas >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell >