From kent.boogaart at gmail.com Sat Mar 9 08:44:20 2013 From: kent.boogaart at gmail.com (Kent Boogaart) Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2013 08:44:20 -0000 Subject: [Shotwell] In-place Importing over SMB no longer working Message-ID: <001701ce1ca2$4bfc03d0$e3f40b70$@gmail.com> Hi, Are there any known issues with in-place importing over SMB with Linux Mint 14? I recently upgraded from LM13 and can no longer do this. It imports the first few files and then just.stops. Looking at my server logs, I can see it stops accessing the files on the share altogether. Looking in the Shotwell log I see nothing of note. Is this a known thing, or do I need to collect further diagnostics? Using 0.13.1. Thanks, Kent From insomniacpenguin at googlemail.com Sat Mar 9 09:49:44 2013 From: insomniacpenguin at googlemail.com (Andy Stevens) Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2013 09:49:44 +0000 Subject: [Shotwell] In-place Importing over SMB no longer working In-Reply-To: <001701ce1ca2$4bfc03d0$e3f40b70$@gmail.com> References: <001701ce1ca2$4bfc03d0$e3f40b70$@gmail.com> Message-ID: Don't know if it's relevant to your problem, but I had a similar problem with rhythmbox in ubuntu betas last year. The gvfsd daemon was crashing under the heavy load of an initial large import from a network share. Not actually a rhymthmbox issue, and possibly not a shotwell issue in your case, but a gvfs bug. See https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rhythmbox/+bug/955124 for more details. Does lm14 use the same version? Andy. On 9 Mar 2013 08:44, "Kent Boogaart" wrote: > Hi, > > > > Are there any known issues with in-place importing over SMB with Linux Mint > 14? I recently upgraded from LM13 and can no longer do this. It imports the > first few files and then just.stops. Looking at my server logs, I can see > it > stops accessing the files on the share altogether. Looking in the Shotwell > log I see nothing of note. > > > > Is this a known thing, or do I need to collect further diagnostics? Using > 0.13.1. > > > > Thanks, > > Kent > > > > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > From thomas at xyz.pp.se Sat Mar 9 12:48:34 2013 From: thomas at xyz.pp.se (Thomas Novin) Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2013 13:48:34 +0100 Subject: [Shotwell] Re-create certain thumbnail Message-ID: Hello Is it possible to re-generate thumbnails for just some file(s)? I have some bad thumbnails because of Bug #6452 but I want to re-generate them when I have the fixed version of Shotwell. Rgds//Thomas From kent.boogaart at gmail.com Sat Mar 9 13:51:06 2013 From: kent.boogaart at gmail.com (Kent Boogaart) Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2013 13:51:06 +0000 Subject: [Shotwell] In-place Importing over SMB no longer working In-Reply-To: References: <001701ce1ca2$4bfc03d0$e3f40b70$@gmail.com> Message-ID: <513B3E4A.9040106@gmail.com> Thanks for the reply. My LM14 (which is up to date) has gvfs version 1.14.0-0ubuntu6 installed. The thing is, I have actually noticed that problem in the past (on LM13) and worked around it by making sure that my imports weren't too bulky. All my photos are in separate folders per year, so I would just import one year at a time, unmounting and remounting the share in between imports. That worked for me on LM13. However, now on LM14 it only takes a dozen photos or so before it dies. Best, Kent On 09/03/13 09:49, Andy Stevens wrote: > > Don't know if it's relevant to your problem, but I had a similar > problem with rhythmbox in ubuntu betas last year. The gvfsd daemon was > crashing under the heavy load of an initial large import from a > network share. Not actually a rhymthmbox issue, and possibly not a > shotwell issue in your case, but a gvfs bug. See > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rhythmbox/+bug/955124 for > more details. Does lm14 use the same version? > > Andy. > > On 9 Mar 2013 08:44, "Kent Boogaart" > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Are there any known issues with in-place importing over SMB with > Linux Mint > 14? I recently upgraded from LM13 and can no longer do this. It > imports the > first few files and then just.stops. Looking at my server logs, I > can see it > stops accessing the files on the share altogether. Looking in the > Shotwell > log I see nothing of note. > > > > Is this a known thing, or do I need to collect further > diagnostics? Using > 0.13.1. > > > > Thanks, > > Kent > > > > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > From joseph.bylund at gmail.com Sat Mar 9 15:37:26 2013 From: joseph.bylund at gmail.com (Joseph Bylund) Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2013 10:37:26 -0500 Subject: [Shotwell] Re-create certain thumbnail In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <513B5736.1070609@gmail.com> Thomas, I believe rotate-undo works, the original message says it does not work for raw files. http://lists.yorba.org/pipermail/shotwell/2011-November/003309.html -Joe On 03/09/2013 07:48 AM, Thomas Novin wrote: > Hello > > Is it possible to re-generate thumbnails for just some file(s)? I have > some bad thumbnails because of Bug #6452 but I want to re-generate > them when I have the fixed version of Shotwell. > > Rgds//Thomas > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From rolf.steinort at gmail.com Sat Mar 9 22:36:11 2013 From: rolf.steinort at gmail.com (Rolf Steinort) Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2013 23:36:11 +0100 Subject: [Shotwell] Shotwell exports the ebeded JPG image to GIMP Message-ID: <513BB95B.4040506@gmail.com> Hi, I am using Debian Testing and Shotwell 0.13.1 from Experimental. I have a Nikon D800 and shoot in RAW+JPEG. After the export I have 3 files per image: 44115941 RLF_0580.NEF 2571683 RLF_0580_NEF_embedded.jpg 11344082 RLF_0580_NEF.jpg When I use "Open in external editor" to get the file into GIMP, Shotwell uses the small and nasty ...embedded.jpg. At first I didn't notice this and was quite upset about NIKON...... ;-) 40929402 RLF_0583.NEF 1844483 RLF_0583_NEF_embedded.jpg 4450868 RLF_0583_NEF_embedded_modified.jpg 10195200 RLF_0583_NEF.jpg Any idea how I can change this behaviour? Thanks for any help! Rolf http://meetthegimp.org From thomas at xyz.pp.se Mon Mar 11 10:34:44 2013 From: thomas at xyz.pp.se (Thomas Novin) Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 11:34:44 +0100 Subject: [Shotwell] Re-create certain thumbnail In-Reply-To: <513B5736.1070609@gmail.com> References: <513B5736.1070609@gmail.com> Message-ID: My issue is with video-files so I don't think I can do rotate there. Any other suggestion? Since I have a 20-30k+ library it seems a bit hefty to remove all thumbnails just to re-create 100 :) Rgds//Thomas On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Joseph Bylund wrote: > Thomas, > I believe rotate-undo works, the original message says it does not work for > raw files. > http://lists.yorba.org/pipermail/shotwell/2011-November/003309.html > -Joe > > On 03/09/2013 07:48 AM, Thomas Novin wrote: >> >> Hello >> >> Is it possible to re-generate thumbnails for just some file(s)? I have >> some bad thumbnails because of Bug #6452 but I want to re-generate >> them when I have the fixed version of Shotwell. >> >> Rgds//Thomas >> _______________________________________________ >> Shotwell mailing list >> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > > From jim at yorba.org Mon Mar 11 19:01:48 2013 From: jim at yorba.org (Jim Nelson) Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 18:54:48 -0007 Subject: [Shotwell] In-place Importing over SMB no longer working In-Reply-To: <513B3E4A.9040106@gmail.com> References: <001701ce1ca2$4bfc03d0$e3f40b70$@gmail.com> <513B3E4A.9040106@gmail.com> Message-ID: <513e2a0d.8906440a.1150.7298@mx.google.com> We've had quite a few users report issues with using a library over SMB, particularly a large library. ?We've not done enough testing on this problem, but it doesn't surprise me that GVFS / Samba might be part of the problem. ?We don't do anything special for networked libraries, but it's possible our import is too aggressive in trying to pull a lot of information across the wire. -- Jim On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 5:51 AM, Kent Boogaart wrote: > Thanks for the reply. > > My LM14 (which is up to date) has gvfs version 1.14.0-0ubuntu6 > installed. The thing is, I have actually noticed that problem in the > past (on LM13) and worked around it by making sure that my imports > weren't too bulky. All my photos are in separate folders per year, so > I would just import one year at a time, unmounting and remounting the > share in between imports. That worked for me on LM13. > > However, now on LM14 it only takes a dozen photos or so before it > dies. > > Best, > Kent > > On 09/03/13 09:49, Andy Stevens wrote: >> >> Don't know if it's relevant to your problem, but I had a similar >> problem with rhythmbox in ubuntu betas last year. The gvfsd daemon >> was crashing under the heavy load of an initial large import from a >> network share. Not actually a rhymthmbox issue, and possibly not a >> shotwell issue in your case, but a gvfs bug. See >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rhythmbox/+bug/955124 for >> more details. Does lm14 use the same version? >> >> Andy. >> >> On 9 Mar 2013 08:44, "Kent Boogaart" > > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> Are there any known issues with in-place importing over SMB with >> Linux Mint >> 14? I recently upgraded from LM13 and can no longer do this. It >> imports the >> first few files and then just.stops. Looking at my server logs, I >> can see it >> stops accessing the files on the share altogether. Looking in the >> Shotwell >> log I see nothing of note. >> >> >> >> Is this a known thing, or do I need to collect further >> diagnostics? Using >> 0.13.1. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Kent >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Shotwell mailing list >> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From clinton at yorba.org Mon Mar 11 19:03:45 2013 From: clinton at yorba.org (Clint Rogers) Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 12:03:45 -0700 Subject: [Shotwell] Re-create certain thumbnail In-Reply-To: References: <513B5736.1070609@gmail.com> Message-ID: Hi Thomas, What should happen is that, if you install or update one or more GStreamer codecs, Shotwell should pick up on this the next time it's launched, and attempt to thumbnail any video files for which it doesn't have thumbnails already. There shouldn't be any need to blow away your other good thumbnails, though. Can you try this and let us know if it works? Cheers, -c On 11/03/2013, Thomas Novin wrote: > My issue is with video-files so I don't think I can do rotate there. > > Any other suggestion? Since I have a 20-30k+ library it seems a bit > hefty to remove all thumbnails just to re-create 100 :) > > Rgds//Thomas > > On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Joseph Bylund > wrote: >> Thomas, >> I believe rotate-undo works, the original message says it does not work >> for >> raw files. >> http://lists.yorba.org/pipermail/shotwell/2011-November/003309.html >> -Joe >> >> On 03/09/2013 07:48 AM, Thomas Novin wrote: >>> >>> Hello >>> >>> Is it possible to re-generate thumbnails for just some file(s)? I have >>> some bad thumbnails because of Bug #6452 but I want to re-generate >>> them when I have the fixed version of Shotwell. >>> >>> Rgds//Thomas >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Shotwell mailing list >>> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >>> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > -- --------------------------- "I asked if Sodium, Bromine and Oxygen wanted to hang out, but they were like 'Na Br O'..." From kent.boogaart at gmail.com Mon Mar 11 19:46:09 2013 From: kent.boogaart at gmail.com (Kent Boogaart) Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 19:46:09 -0000 Subject: [Shotwell] In-place Importing over SMB no longer working In-Reply-To: <513e2a0d.8906440a.1150.7298@mx.google.com> References: <001701ce1ca2$4bfc03d0$e3f40b70$@gmail.com> <513B3E4A.9040106@gmail.com> <513e2a0d.8906440a.1150.7298@mx.google.com> Message-ID: <002301ce1e91$15b30cb0$41192610$@gmail.com> Understood ? it does seem likely that gvfs at fault here. Nothing Shotwell (or anything else) does should cause it to dismount or stop serving prematurely. Unfortunately, I?ve had to switch to using a different product (and operating system) because of this issue. I?ll check back every now and then, though I?m not holding my breath given how long gvfs has had these kinds of problems. Best, Kent From: Jim Nelson [mailto:jim at yorba.org] Sent: 11 March 2013 19:02 To: Kent Boogaart Cc: Andy Stevens; shotwell at lists.yorba.org Subject: Re: [Shotwell] In-place Importing over SMB no longer working We've had quite a few users report issues with using a library over SMB, particularly a large library. We've not done enough testing on this problem, but it doesn't surprise me that GVFS / Samba might be part of the problem. We don't do anything special for networked libraries, but it's possible our import is too aggressive in trying to pull a lot of information across the wire. -- Jim On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 5:51 AM, Kent Boogaart > wrote: Thanks for the reply. My LM14 (which is up to date) has gvfs version 1.14.0-0ubuntu6 installed. The thing is, I have actually noticed that problem in the past (on LM13) and worked around it by making sure that my imports weren't too bulky. All my photos are in separate folders per year, so I would just import one year at a time, unmounting and remounting the share in between imports. That worked for me on LM13. However, now on LM14 it only takes a dozen photos or so before it dies. Best, Kent On 09/03/13 09:49, Andy Stevens wrote: Don't know if it's relevant to your problem, but I had a similar problem with rhythmbox in ubuntu betas last year. The gvfsd daemon was crashing under the heavy load of an initial large import from a network share. Not actually a rhymthmbox issue, and possibly not a shotwell issue in your case, but a gvfs bug. See https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rhythmbox/+bug/955124 for more details. Does lm14 use the same version? Andy. On 9 Mar 2013 08:44, "Kent Boogaart" > wrote: Hi, Are there any known issues with in-place importing over SMB with Linux Mint 14? I recently upgraded from LM13 and can no longer do this. It imports the first few files and then just.stops. Looking at my server logs, I can see it stops accessing the files on the share altogether. Looking in the Shotwell log I see nothing of note. Is this a known thing, or do I need to collect further diagnostics? Using 0.13.1. Thanks, Kent _______________________________________________ Shotwell mailing list Shotwell at lists.yorba.org http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell _______________________________________________ Shotwell mailing list Shotwell at lists.yorba.org http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From clanlaw at googlemail.com Mon Mar 11 21:03:46 2013 From: clanlaw at googlemail.com (Colin Law) Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 21:03:46 +0000 Subject: [Shotwell] Importing video Message-ID: Should I be able to import an mp4 (h264) video file? When I attempt it I get the dreaded hanging attempting to import it and have to delete the file in order to carry on. Colin From jim at yorba.org Mon Mar 11 21:07:04 2013 From: jim at yorba.org (Jim Nelson) Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 21:00:04 -0007 Subject: [Shotwell] Importing video In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <513e4769.e8c4440a.6387.7e3d@mx.google.com> What version of Shotwell are you using? -- Jim On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Colin Law wrote: > Should I be able to import an mp4 (h264) video file? When I attempt > it I get the dreaded hanging attempting to import it and have to > delete the file in order to carry on. > > Colin > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > From clanlaw at googlemail.com Mon Mar 11 21:24:16 2013 From: clanlaw at googlemail.com (Colin Law) Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 21:24:16 +0000 Subject: [Shotwell] Importing video In-Reply-To: <513e4769.e8c4440a.6387.7e3d@mx.google.com> References: <513e4769.e8c4440a.6387.7e3d@mx.google.com> Message-ID: On 11 March 2013 21:07, Jim Nelson wrote: > What version of Shotwell are you using? Sorry, I should know better. 0.13.1 on Ubuntu (Raring alpha but don't expect that to be a factor). Colin > > -- Jim > > > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Colin Law wrote: > > Should I be able to import an mp4 (h264) video file? When I attempt > it I get the dreaded hanging attempting to import it and have to > delete the file in order to carry on. > > Colin From clanlaw at googlemail.com Mon Mar 11 21:31:28 2013 From: clanlaw at googlemail.com (Colin Law) Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 21:31:28 +0000 Subject: [Shotwell] Importing video In-Reply-To: References: <513e4769.e8c4440a.6387.7e3d@mx.google.com> Message-ID: On 11 March 2013 21:24, Colin Law wrote: > On 11 March 2013 21:07, Jim Nelson wrote: >> What version of Shotwell are you using? > > Sorry, I should know better. 0.13.1 on Ubuntu (Raring alpha but don't > expect that to be a factor). On the other hand I have just tried it on 0.13.1 on Ubuntu 12.04 (with the same video) and it is ok, so I guess it may be a Raring issue. When I run it from a terminal (before attempting the import) I see the o/p below, then when I drag the file into shotwell and tell it to copy it sits saying "Preparing to import.." at the bottom, with no more o/p in the terminal. It has copied the file into the 1904/01 folder. If I restart shotwell it sits at Preparing to auto-import. $ shotwell (shotwell:17688): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: specified class size for type `GstCapsFilter' is smaller than the parent type's `GstBaseTransform' class size (shotwell:17688): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion `result != 0' failed (shotwell:17688): GStreamer-CRITICAL **: gst_element_register: assertion `g_type_is_a (type, GST_TYPE_ELEMENT)' failed (shotwell:17688): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: specified class size for type `GstGioBaseSink' is smaller than the parent type's `GstBaseSink' class size (shotwell:17688): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion `result != 0' failed (shotwell:17688): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_type_register_static: assertion `parent_type > 0' failed (shotwell:17688): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_type_add_interface_static: assertion `G_TYPE_IS_INSTANTIATABLE (instance_type)' failed (shotwell:17688): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion `result != 0' failed (shotwell:17688): GStreamer-CRITICAL **: gst_element_register: assertion `g_type_is_a (type, GST_TYPE_ELEMENT)' failed (shotwell:17688): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: specified class size for type `GstGioBaseSrc' is smaller than the parent type's `GstBaseSrc' class size (shotwell:17688): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion `result != 0' failed (shotwell:17688): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_type_register_static: assertion `parent_type > 0' failed (shotwell:17688): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_type_add_interface_static: assertion `G_TYPE_IS_INSTANTIATABLE (instance_type)' failed (shotwell:17688): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion `result != 0' failed (shotwell:17688): GStreamer-CRITICAL **: gst_element_register: assertion `g_type_is_a (type, GST_TYPE_ELEMENT)' failed > > > Colin > >> >> -- Jim >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Colin Law wrote: >> >> Should I be able to import an mp4 (h264) video file? When I attempt >> it I get the dreaded hanging attempting to import it and have to >> delete the file in order to carry on. >> >> Colin From rolf.steinort at gmail.com Mon Mar 11 22:42:02 2013 From: rolf.steinort at gmail.com (Rolf Steinort) Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 23:42:02 +0100 Subject: [Shotwell] Embedded image gets exported to GIMP from Shotwell Message-ID: <513E5DBA.8050202@gmail.com> Hi, I am using Debian Testing and Shotwell 0.13.1 from Experimental. I have a Nikon D800 and shoot in RAW+JPEG. After the import from the memory card I have 3 files per shot: 44115941 RLF_0580.NEF 2571683 RLF_0580_NEF_embedded.jpg 11344082 RLF_0580_NEF.jpg When I use "Open in external editor" to get the file into GIMP, Shotwell uses the small and nasty ...embedded.jpg. At first I didn't notice this and was quite upset about NIKON...... 40929402 RLF_0583.NEF 1844483 RLF_0583_NEF_embedded.jpg 4450868 RLF_0583_NEF_embedded_modified.jpg 10195200 RLF_0583_NEF.jpg Any idea how I can change this behaviour? Thanks for any help! Rolf http://meetthegimp.org From lucas at yorba.org Mon Mar 11 22:59:13 2013 From: lucas at yorba.org (Lucas Beeler) Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:59:13 -0700 Subject: [Shotwell] Embedded image gets exported to GIMP from Shotwell In-Reply-To: <513E5DBA.8050202@gmail.com> References: <513E5DBA.8050202@gmail.com> Message-ID: Hi Rolf, Within the next few weeks, Shotwell 0.14.0 will be released, with dramatically improved RAW support. The issue you're describing has already been fixed in our master development branch. So the best way to resolve your problem is simply to upgrade. Since Shotwell 0.14.0 hasn't been formally packaged or released yet, this means you'll have to build from source. But this is a snap. Indeed, we have a ready-to-compile tarball for Shotwell 0.14.0 Pre-Release 1 available here: http://www.yorba.org/download/shotwell/0.14/shotwell-0.14.0pr1.tar.xz. If you need help compiling or installing Shotwell, check out the instructions on the Shotwell installation page: http://www.yorba.org/shotwell/install.html. Since 0.14.0 hasn't been released yet, the build dependencies on the Shotwell installation page are a little out of date. Shotwell now requires the 1.0 versions of the GStreamer libraries and plugin packs. Did upgrading resolve your problem? Take care, Lucas On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Rolf Steinort wrote: > Hi, > > I am using Debian Testing and Shotwell 0.13.1 from Experimental. I have a > Nikon D800 and shoot in RAW+JPEG. > > After the import from the memory card I have 3 files per shot: > > 44115941 RLF_0580.NEF > 2571683 RLF_0580_NEF_embedded.jpg > 11344082 RLF_0580_NEF.jpg > > When I use "Open in external editor" to get the file into GIMP, Shotwell > uses the small and nasty ...embedded.jpg. > > At first I didn't notice this and was quite upset about NIKON...... > > 40929402 RLF_0583.NEF > 1844483 RLF_0583_NEF_embedded.jpg > 4450868 RLF_0583_NEF_embedded_modified.jpg > 10195200 RLF_0583_NEF.jpg > > Any idea how I can change this behaviour? > > Thanks for any help! > > Rolf > > http://meetthegimp.org > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From lucas at yorba.org Mon Mar 11 23:48:34 2013 From: lucas at yorba.org (Lucas Beeler) Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 16:48:34 -0700 Subject: [Shotwell] Importing video In-Reply-To: References: <513e4769.e8c4440a.6387.7e3d@mx.google.com> Message-ID: Hi Colin, You're a power user and a regular contributor to the Shotwell mailing list, so I hope you don't mind if I get a little technical on you. ;-) As you probably know, Shotwell 0.14.0 is due out soon. All of the code in Shotwell 0.14.0s video handling subsystem is linked against GStreamer 1.0, whereas all of the code in Shotwell 0.13.1 is linked against GStreamer 0.10. The errors you're seeing above are definitely generated by GStreamer, so what I think is going on here is a GStreamer version mismatch. Insofar as we've been able to tell, Ubuntu Raring uses GStreamer 1.0 throughout its entire media stack, but Shotwell 0.13.0 is a GStreamer 0.10-based application. Put briefly, I think that most of your problems will go away if you just upgrade to Shotwell 0.14.0. Now, while it's true Shotwell 0.14.0 isn't out yet, a pre-release tarball is available here: http://www.yorba.org/download/shotwell/0.14/shotwell-0.14.0pr1.tar.xz. You'll have to build from source after download the tarball, of course. If you'd rather not build from source, you could try installing a Shotwell daily development snapshot from the Yorba daily builds PPA, available here: https://launchpad.net/~yorba/+archive/daily-builds/. Let us know if upgrading solves your problem! Cheers, Lucas On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Colin Law wrote: > On 11 March 2013 21:24, Colin Law wrote: >> On 11 March 2013 21:07, Jim Nelson wrote: >>> What version of Shotwell are you using? >> >> Sorry, I should know better. 0.13.1 on Ubuntu (Raring alpha but don't >> expect that to be a factor). > > On the other hand I have just tried it on 0.13.1 on Ubuntu 12.04 (with > the same video) and it is ok, so I guess it may be a Raring issue. > > When I run it from a terminal (before attempting the import) I see the > o/p below, then when I drag the file into shotwell and tell it to copy > it sits saying "Preparing to import.." at the bottom, with no more o/p > in the terminal. It has copied the file into the 1904/01 folder. If > I restart shotwell it sits at Preparing to auto-import. > > > $ shotwell > > (shotwell:17688): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: specified class size for > type `GstCapsFilter' is smaller than the parent type's > `GstBaseTransform' class size > > (shotwell:17688): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion > `result != 0' failed > > (shotwell:17688): GStreamer-CRITICAL **: gst_element_register: > assertion `g_type_is_a (type, GST_TYPE_ELEMENT)' failed > > (shotwell:17688): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: specified class size for > type `GstGioBaseSink' is smaller than the parent type's `GstBaseSink' > class size > > (shotwell:17688): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion > `result != 0' failed > > (shotwell:17688): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_type_register_static: > assertion `parent_type > 0' failed > > (shotwell:17688): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: > g_type_add_interface_static: assertion `G_TYPE_IS_INSTANTIATABLE > (instance_type)' failed > > (shotwell:17688): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion > `result != 0' failed > > (shotwell:17688): GStreamer-CRITICAL **: gst_element_register: > assertion `g_type_is_a (type, GST_TYPE_ELEMENT)' failed > > (shotwell:17688): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: specified class size for > type `GstGioBaseSrc' is smaller than the parent type's `GstBaseSrc' > class size > > (shotwell:17688): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion > `result != 0' failed > > (shotwell:17688): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_type_register_static: > assertion `parent_type > 0' failed > > (shotwell:17688): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: > g_type_add_interface_static: assertion `G_TYPE_IS_INSTANTIATABLE > (instance_type)' failed > > (shotwell:17688): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion > `result != 0' failed > > (shotwell:17688): GStreamer-CRITICAL **: gst_element_register: > assertion `g_type_is_a (type, GST_TYPE_ELEMENT)' failed > > > >> >> >> Colin >> >>> >>> -- Jim >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Colin Law wrote: >>> >>> Should I be able to import an mp4 (h264) video file? When I attempt >>> it I get the dreaded hanging attempting to import it and have to >>> delete the file in order to carry on. >>> >>> Colin > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From clanlaw at googlemail.com Tue Mar 12 08:23:50 2013 From: clanlaw at googlemail.com (Colin Law) Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 08:23:50 +0000 Subject: [Shotwell] Importing video In-Reply-To: References: <513e4769.e8c4440a.6387.7e3d@mx.google.com> Message-ID: Hi Lucas Thanks for the suggestions. A couple of questions, is the intention that 0.14.0 will be included in Raring when that is released? I thought we were already past feature freeze, but I don't really understand how all that works. Also are there any changes in the database format between 0.13 and 0.14? I share the db and photos between two machines (one of which is on Ubuntu 12.04) so if there are changes I might have to upgrade them both. Finally, if I use the daily ppa will I get stuff that is later than 0.14.0, if you see what I mean? Cheers Colin On 11 March 2013 23:48, Lucas Beeler wrote: > Hi Colin, > > You're a power user and a regular contributor to the Shotwell mailing > list, so I hope you don't mind if I get a little technical on you. ;-) > As you probably know, Shotwell 0.14.0 is due out soon. All of the code > in Shotwell 0.14.0s video handling subsystem is linked against > GStreamer 1.0, whereas all of the code in Shotwell 0.13.1 is linked > against GStreamer 0.10. The errors you're seeing above are definitely > generated by GStreamer, so what I think is going on here is a > GStreamer version mismatch. Insofar as we've been able to tell, Ubuntu > Raring uses GStreamer 1.0 throughout its entire media stack, but > Shotwell 0.13.0 is a GStreamer 0.10-based application. Put briefly, I > think that most of your problems will go away if you just upgrade to > Shotwell 0.14.0. Now, while it's true Shotwell 0.14.0 isn't out yet, a > pre-release tarball is available here: > http://www.yorba.org/download/shotwell/0.14/shotwell-0.14.0pr1.tar.xz. > You'll have to build from source after download the tarball, of > course. > > If you'd rather not build from source, you could try installing a > Shotwell daily development snapshot from the Yorba daily builds PPA, > available here: https://launchpad.net/~yorba/+archive/daily-builds/. > > Let us know if upgrading solves your problem! > From thomas at xyz.pp.se Tue Mar 12 16:47:27 2013 From: thomas at xyz.pp.se (Thomas Novin) Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 17:47:27 +0100 Subject: [Shotwell] Re-create certain thumbnail In-Reply-To: References: <513B5736.1070609@gmail.com> Message-ID: Not very good I guess, I already have "bad thumbnails" so they are not empty. https://xyz.pp.se/~thnov/up/Screenshot%20from%202013-03-12%2017:44:09.png However, I still get gray thumbnails on certain videos when I import new ones, even after the issue was closed. But still all is good in Nautilus. Rgds//Thomas On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Clint Rogers wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > What should happen is that, if you install or update one or more > GStreamer codecs, Shotwell should pick up on this the next time it's > launched, and attempt to thumbnail any video files for which it > doesn't have thumbnails already. There shouldn't be any need to blow > away your other good thumbnails, though. > > Can you try this and let us know if it works? > > Cheers, > -c > > > On 11/03/2013, Thomas Novin wrote: >> My issue is with video-files so I don't think I can do rotate there. >> >> Any other suggestion? Since I have a 20-30k+ library it seems a bit >> hefty to remove all thumbnails just to re-create 100 :) >> >> Rgds//Thomas >> >> On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Joseph Bylund >> wrote: >>> Thomas, >>> I believe rotate-undo works, the original message says it does not work >>> for >>> raw files. >>> http://lists.yorba.org/pipermail/shotwell/2011-November/003309.html >>> -Joe >>> >>> On 03/09/2013 07:48 AM, Thomas Novin wrote: >>>> >>>> Hello >>>> >>>> Is it possible to re-generate thumbnails for just some file(s)? I have >>>> some bad thumbnails because of Bug #6452 but I want to re-generate >>>> them when I have the fixed version of Shotwell. >>>> >>>> Rgds//Thomas >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Shotwell mailing list >>>> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >>>> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Shotwell mailing list >> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell >> > > > -- > --------------------------- > "I asked if Sodium, Bromine and Oxygen wanted to hang out, but they > were like 'Na Br O'..." From lucas at yorba.org Tue Mar 12 23:30:20 2013 From: lucas at yorba.org (Lucas Beeler) Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 16:30:20 -0700 Subject: [Shotwell] Importing video In-Reply-To: References: <513e4769.e8c4440a.6387.7e3d@mx.google.com> Message-ID: > A couple of questions, is the intention > that 0.14.0 will be included in Raring > when that is released? 0.14.0 should indeed be included in Raring. We issued a Preview Release tarball to Canonical before their feature freeze. Likewise, features in Shotwell 0.14.0 are now frozen (as of March 4, when we issued Preview Release 1), but we'll continue to fix bugs 'til the final release of 0.14.0, which should come in the next few weeks. > Also are there any changes in the > database format between 0.13 and > 0.14? Yes. > share the db and photos between > two machines (one of which is on > Ubuntu 12.04) Shotwell 0.14.0 should run on Ubuntu 12.04 provided you install GStreamer 1.0 from the GStreamer Developers PPA (https://launchpad.net/~gstreamer-developers/+archive/ppa). > if I use the daily ppa will I get stuff that > is later than 0.14.0, if you see what I > mean? The big problem here is that if you subscribe to the daily PPA, you'll continue to get unstable Shotwell development snapshots even after the 0.14.0 release. So I'd recommend the following. First, subscribe to the Yorba daily PPA. Next, install Shotwell. Finally, unsubscribe from the daily PPA and wait for the final 0.14.0 release. Cheers, Lucas On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 1:23 AM, Colin Law wrote: > Hi Lucas > > Thanks for the suggestions. A couple of questions, is the intention > that 0.14.0 will be included in Raring when that is released? I > thought we were already past feature freeze, but I don't really > understand how all that works. > > Also are there any changes in the database format between 0.13 and > 0.14? I share the db and photos between two machines (one of which is > on Ubuntu 12.04) so if there are changes I might have to upgrade them > both. > > Finally, if I use the daily ppa will I get stuff that is later than > 0.14.0, if you see what I mean? > > Cheers > Colin > > On 11 March 2013 23:48, Lucas Beeler wrote: >> Hi Colin, >> >> You're a power user and a regular contributor to the Shotwell mailing >> list, so I hope you don't mind if I get a little technical on you. ;-) >> As you probably know, Shotwell 0.14.0 is due out soon. All of the code >> in Shotwell 0.14.0s video handling subsystem is linked against >> GStreamer 1.0, whereas all of the code in Shotwell 0.13.1 is linked >> against GStreamer 0.10. The errors you're seeing above are definitely >> generated by GStreamer, so what I think is going on here is a >> GStreamer version mismatch. Insofar as we've been able to tell, Ubuntu >> Raring uses GStreamer 1.0 throughout its entire media stack, but >> Shotwell 0.13.0 is a GStreamer 0.10-based application. Put briefly, I >> think that most of your problems will go away if you just upgrade to >> Shotwell 0.14.0. Now, while it's true Shotwell 0.14.0 isn't out yet, a >> pre-release tarball is available here: >> http://www.yorba.org/download/shotwell/0.14/shotwell-0.14.0pr1.tar.xz. >> You'll have to build from source after download the tarball, of >> course. >> >> If you'd rather not build from source, you could try installing a >> Shotwell daily development snapshot from the Yorba daily builds PPA, >> available here: https://launchpad.net/~yorba/+archive/daily-builds/. >> >> Let us know if upgrading solves your problem! >> From lucas at yorba.org Wed Mar 13 01:24:50 2013 From: lucas at yorba.org (Lucas Beeler) Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 18:24:50 -0700 Subject: [Shotwell] Call for Testing: Shotwell 0.14 Message-ID: Hi Shotwell Fans, Shotwell 0.14.0 is soon to be released! This upcoming version of Shotwell packs a ton of new features, including: * A folder tree in the sidebar provides a directory-hierarchy view of your Shotwell library * Dramatically improved user experience for RAW photographers?long-standing bugs involving RAW developer switching have been fixed * Comprehensive logging of photo and video import, including the ability to save an import log file to disk. The log tracks which files were detected as duplicates as well as files that couldn't be imported due to disk or camera problems. * The Facebook Connector now uses the Facebook Graph API, resulting in a smoother, more stable experience uploading photos and videos to Facebook. As a bonus, Shotwell photo titles now appear as Facebook photo captions! * The Shotwell video subsystem now relies on GStreamer 1.0, making for easier, more stable video import, better video thumbnails, and better handling of video metadata * New slideshow effects, improved Piwigo support, the ability to show and hide the main Shotwell sidebar, and more... You can help us make Shotwell 0.14.0 the most stable Shotwell ever by downloading the current development snapshot and testing it. To get and test the latest code, you'll need to either pull from Shotwell git master and build from source or, if you're on Ubuntu, install a Shotwell daily build from the Yorba daily builds PPA. Pulling from Shotwell git master should be as easy as executing $ git clone git://yorba.org/shotwell on your system, and then building as usual with $ ./configure $ make # make install For Ubuntu users, the Shotwell daily builds PPA is located here: https://launchpad.net/~yorba/+archive/daily-builds As always, we suggest backing up your Shotwell database before testing pre-release code. You can learn how to do this by reading the "How can I back up my Shotwell library?" section of the Shotwell FAQ here: http://redmine.yorba.org/projects/shotwell/wiki/ShotwellFAQ Cheers, Lucas ----------------------- Lucas Beeler Shotwell Technical Lead Yorba Foundation San Francisco, California From onefiftyfour at hotmail.com Wed Mar 13 11:48:43 2013 From: onefiftyfour at hotmail.com (eric L) Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 06:48:43 -0500 Subject: [Shotwell] Call for Testing: Shotwell 0.14 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: How should I go about upgrading gstreamer packages? I'm running Fedora 17. I have the following packages installed: gstreamer.x86_64 0.10.36-1.fc17 @koji-override-0/$releasever gstreamer-devel.x86_64 0.10.36-1.fc17 @fedora gstreamer-ffmpeg.x86_64 0.10.13-2.fc17 @rpmfusion-free gstreamer-plugins-bad-free.x86_64 gstreamer-plugins-base.x86_64 0.10.36-2.fc17 @updates gstreamer-plugins-base-devel.x86_64 gstreamer-plugins-good.x86_64 0.10.31-4.fc17 @updates gstreamer-python.x86_64 0.10.22-2.fc17 @updates gstreamer-rtsp.x86_64 0.10.8-2.fc17 @koji-override-0/$releasever gstreamer-tools.x86_64 0.10.36-1.fc17 @koji-override-0/$releasever phonon-backend-gstreamer.x86_64 2:4.6.3-1.fc17 @updates do i need to uninstall and upgrade just gstreamer or do i need to upgrade each plugin also? and I assume i need to download and install these from source or do you know of packages to get the version 1 series? -eric shotwell version installed: 0.13.1+trunk > Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 18:24:50 -0700 > From: lucas at yorba.org > To: shotwell at lists.yorba.org > Subject: [Shotwell] Call for Testing: Shotwell 0.14 > > Hi Shotwell Fans, > > Shotwell 0.14.0 is soon to be released! This upcoming version of > Shotwell packs a ton of new features, including: > > * A folder tree in the sidebar provides a directory-hierarchy view of > your Shotwell library > > * Dramatically improved user experience for RAW > photographers?long-standing bugs involving RAW developer switching > have been fixed > > * Comprehensive logging of photo and video import, including the > ability to save an import log file to disk. The log tracks which files > were detected as duplicates as well as files that couldn't be imported > due to disk or camera problems. > > * The Facebook Connector now uses the Facebook Graph API, resulting in > a smoother, more stable experience uploading photos and videos to > Facebook. As a bonus, Shotwell photo titles now appear as Facebook > photo captions! > > * The Shotwell video subsystem now relies on GStreamer 1.0, making for > easier, more stable video import, better video thumbnails, and better > handling of video metadata > > * New slideshow effects, improved Piwigo support, the ability to show > and hide the main Shotwell sidebar, and more... > > You can help us make Shotwell 0.14.0 the most stable Shotwell ever by > downloading the current development snapshot and testing it. To get > and test the latest code, you'll need to either pull from Shotwell git > master and build from source or, if you're on Ubuntu, install a > Shotwell daily build from the Yorba daily builds PPA. > > Pulling from Shotwell git master should be as easy as executing > > $ git clone git://yorba.org/shotwell > > on your system, and then building as usual with > > $ ./configure > $ make > # make install > > For Ubuntu users, the Shotwell daily builds PPA is located here: > https://launchpad.net/~yorba/+archive/daily-builds > > As always, we suggest backing up your Shotwell database before testing > pre-release code. You can learn how to do this by reading the "How can > I back up my Shotwell library?" section of the Shotwell FAQ here: > http://redmine.yorba.org/projects/shotwell/wiki/ShotwellFAQ > > Cheers, > Lucas > > ----------------------- > Lucas Beeler > Shotwell Technical Lead > Yorba Foundation > San Francisco, California > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From gpopac at gmail.com Wed Mar 13 12:07:20 2013 From: gpopac at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9C=D0=B8=D0=BB=D0=BE=D1=88_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9F=D0=BE=D0=BF=D0=BE=D0=B2=D0=B8=D1=9B?=) Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 13:07:20 +0100 Subject: [Shotwell] Call for Testing: Shotwell 0.14 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1363176440.2747.5.camel@medjed> Hi, 1.It is much better RAW handling during the input, but I still have separate "photo.cr2 + photo_cr2_shotwell.jpg + photo.jpg" pairs in my database. 2. Also, during the time, the Shotwell has become terribly slow for a 5-10 min since the startup due to some meta-data checking: L 2627 2013-03-13 12:56:08 [CRT] Upper boundary of data for directory Canon, entry 0x009a is out of bounds: Offset = 0x00004d14, size = 80, exceeds buffer size by 14 Bytes; truncating the entry It may be Gimp+EXIF bug. Is it possible to skip this checking somehow or to repair those tags? ? ???, 12. 03 2013. ? 18:24 -0700, Lucas Beeler ????: > Hi Shotwell Fans, > > Shotwell 0.14.0 is soon to be released! This upcoming version of > Shotwell packs a ton of new features, including: > > * A folder tree in the sidebar provides a directory-hierarchy view of > your Shotwell library > > * Dramatically improved user experience for RAW > photographers?long-standing bugs involving RAW developer switching > have been fixed > > * Comprehensive logging of photo and video import, including the > ability to save an import log file to disk. The log tracks which files > were detected as duplicates as well as files that couldn't be imported > due to disk or camera problems. > > * The Facebook Connector now uses the Facebook Graph API, resulting in > a smoother, more stable experience uploading photos and videos to > Facebook. As a bonus, Shotwell photo titles now appear as Facebook > photo captions! > > * The Shotwell video subsystem now relies on GStreamer 1.0, making for > easier, more stable video import, better video thumbnails, and better > handling of video metadata > > * New slideshow effects, improved Piwigo support, the ability to show > and hide the main Shotwell sidebar, and more... > > You can help us make Shotwell 0.14.0 the most stable Shotwell ever by > downloading the current development snapshot and testing it. To get > and test the latest code, you'll need to either pull from Shotwell git > master and build from source or, if you're on Ubuntu, install a > Shotwell daily build from the Yorba daily builds PPA. > > Pulling from Shotwell git master should be as easy as executing > > $ git clone git://yorba.org/shotwell > > on your system, and then building as usual with > > $ ./configure > $ make > # make install > > For Ubuntu users, the Shotwell daily builds PPA is located here: > https://launchpad.net/~yorba/+archive/daily-builds > > As always, we suggest backing up your Shotwell database before testing > pre-release code. You can learn how to do this by reading the "How can > I back up my Shotwell library?" section of the Shotwell FAQ here: > http://redmine.yorba.org/projects/shotwell/wiki/ShotwellFAQ > > Cheers, > Lucas > > ----------------------- > Lucas Beeler > Shotwell Technical Lead > Yorba Foundation > San Francisco, California > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From lucas at yorba.org Wed Mar 13 16:44:06 2013 From: lucas at yorba.org (Lucas Beeler) Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 09:44:06 -0700 Subject: [Shotwell] Call for Testing: Shotwell 0.14 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Eric, To build Shotwell 0.14, you'll need 1.x versions of at least the following packages: gstreamer, gstreamer-devel, gstreamer-plugins-base, and gstreamer-plugins-base-devel. rpmfind.net seems to indicate that at least some of these packages are available as binary rpms. See http://rpmfind.net/linux/rpm2html/search.php?query=pkgconfig%28gstreamer-1.0%29 for more information. Lucas On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 4:48 AM, eric L wrote: > How should I go about upgrading gstreamer packages? I'm running Fedora 17. I have the following packages installed: > gstreamer.x86_64 0.10.36-1.fc17 @koji-override-0/$releasever > gstreamer-devel.x86_64 0.10.36-1.fc17 @fedora > gstreamer-ffmpeg.x86_64 0.10.13-2.fc17 @rpmfusion-free > gstreamer-plugins-bad-free.x86_64 > gstreamer-plugins-base.x86_64 0.10.36-2.fc17 @updates > gstreamer-plugins-base-devel.x86_64 > gstreamer-plugins-good.x86_64 0.10.31-4.fc17 @updates > gstreamer-python.x86_64 0.10.22-2.fc17 @updates > gstreamer-rtsp.x86_64 0.10.8-2.fc17 @koji-override-0/$releasever > gstreamer-tools.x86_64 0.10.36-1.fc17 @koji-override-0/$releasever > phonon-backend-gstreamer.x86_64 2:4.6.3-1.fc17 @updates > > do i need to uninstall and upgrade just gstreamer or do i need to upgrade each plugin also? > and I assume i need to download and install these from source or do you know of packages to get the version 1 series? > > -eric > > shotwell version installed: 0.13.1+trunk > >> Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 18:24:50 -0700 >> From: lucas at yorba.org >> To: shotwell at lists.yorba.org >> Subject: [Shotwell] Call for Testing: Shotwell 0.14 >> >> Hi Shotwell Fans, >> >> Shotwell 0.14.0 is soon to be released! This upcoming version of >> Shotwell packs a ton of new features, including: >> >> * A folder tree in the sidebar provides a directory-hierarchy view of >> your Shotwell library >> >> * Dramatically improved user experience for RAW >> photographers?long-standing bugs involving RAW developer switching >> have been fixed >> >> * Comprehensive logging of photo and video import, including the >> ability to save an import log file to disk. The log tracks which files >> were detected as duplicates as well as files that couldn't be imported >> due to disk or camera problems. >> >> * The Facebook Connector now uses the Facebook Graph API, resulting in >> a smoother, more stable experience uploading photos and videos to >> Facebook. As a bonus, Shotwell photo titles now appear as Facebook >> photo captions! >> >> * The Shotwell video subsystem now relies on GStreamer 1.0, making for >> easier, more stable video import, better video thumbnails, and better >> handling of video metadata >> >> * New slideshow effects, improved Piwigo support, the ability to show >> and hide the main Shotwell sidebar, and more... >> >> You can help us make Shotwell 0.14.0 the most stable Shotwell ever by >> downloading the current development snapshot and testing it. To get >> and test the latest code, you'll need to either pull from Shotwell git >> master and build from source or, if you're on Ubuntu, install a >> Shotwell daily build from the Yorba daily builds PPA. >> >> Pulling from Shotwell git master should be as easy as executing >> >> $ git clone git://yorba.org/shotwell >> >> on your system, and then building as usual with >> >> $ ./configure >> $ make >> # make install >> >> For Ubuntu users, the Shotwell daily builds PPA is located here: >> https://launchpad.net/~yorba/+archive/daily-builds >> >> As always, we suggest backing up your Shotwell database before testing >> pre-release code. You can learn how to do this by reading the "How can >> I back up my Shotwell library?" section of the Shotwell FAQ here: >> http://redmine.yorba.org/projects/shotwell/wiki/ShotwellFAQ >> >> Cheers, >> Lucas >> >> ----------------------- >> Lucas Beeler >> Shotwell Technical Lead >> Yorba Foundation >> San Francisco, California >> _______________________________________________ >> Shotwell mailing list >> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From thomas at xyz.pp.se Wed Mar 13 20:23:55 2013 From: thomas at xyz.pp.se (Thomas Novin) Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 21:23:55 +0100 Subject: [Shotwell] Call for Testing: Shotwell 0.14 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: To just install it from PPA on Ubuntu I did this: sudo apt-add-repository ppa:gstreamer-developers/ppa sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get install gstreamer1.0-libav gstreamer1.0-plugins-base gstreamer1.0-plugins-good gstreamer1.0-plugins-ugly gstreamer1.0-pulseaudio gstreamer1.0-tools gstreamer1.0-x libgstreamer1.0-0 ..then upgrade shotwell. I know you said Fedora but maybe you can find similar packages. -ffmpeg is now -libav btw. Rgds//Thomas On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 12:48 PM, eric L wrote: > How should I go about upgrading gstreamer packages? I'm running Fedora 17. I have the following packages installed: > gstreamer.x86_64 0.10.36-1.fc17 @koji-override-0/$releasever > gstreamer-devel.x86_64 0.10.36-1.fc17 @fedora > gstreamer-ffmpeg.x86_64 0.10.13-2.fc17 @rpmfusion-free > gstreamer-plugins-bad-free.x86_64 > gstreamer-plugins-base.x86_64 0.10.36-2.fc17 @updates > gstreamer-plugins-base-devel.x86_64 > gstreamer-plugins-good.x86_64 0.10.31-4.fc17 @updates > gstreamer-python.x86_64 0.10.22-2.fc17 @updates > gstreamer-rtsp.x86_64 0.10.8-2.fc17 @koji-override-0/$releasever > gstreamer-tools.x86_64 0.10.36-1.fc17 @koji-override-0/$releasever > phonon-backend-gstreamer.x86_64 2:4.6.3-1.fc17 @updates > > do i need to uninstall and upgrade just gstreamer or do i need to upgrade each plugin also? > and I assume i need to download and install these from source or do you know of packages to get the version 1 series? > > -eric > > shotwell version installed: 0.13.1+trunk > >> Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 18:24:50 -0700 >> From: lucas at yorba.org >> To: shotwell at lists.yorba.org >> Subject: [Shotwell] Call for Testing: Shotwell 0.14 >> >> Hi Shotwell Fans, >> >> Shotwell 0.14.0 is soon to be released! This upcoming version of >> Shotwell packs a ton of new features, including: >> >> * A folder tree in the sidebar provides a directory-hierarchy view of >> your Shotwell library >> >> * Dramatically improved user experience for RAW >> photographers?long-standing bugs involving RAW developer switching >> have been fixed >> >> * Comprehensive logging of photo and video import, including the >> ability to save an import log file to disk. The log tracks which files >> were detected as duplicates as well as files that couldn't be imported >> due to disk or camera problems. >> >> * The Facebook Connector now uses the Facebook Graph API, resulting in >> a smoother, more stable experience uploading photos and videos to >> Facebook. As a bonus, Shotwell photo titles now appear as Facebook >> photo captions! >> >> * The Shotwell video subsystem now relies on GStreamer 1.0, making for >> easier, more stable video import, better video thumbnails, and better >> handling of video metadata >> >> * New slideshow effects, improved Piwigo support, the ability to show >> and hide the main Shotwell sidebar, and more... >> >> You can help us make Shotwell 0.14.0 the most stable Shotwell ever by >> downloading the current development snapshot and testing it. To get >> and test the latest code, you'll need to either pull from Shotwell git >> master and build from source or, if you're on Ubuntu, install a >> Shotwell daily build from the Yorba daily builds PPA. >> >> Pulling from Shotwell git master should be as easy as executing >> >> $ git clone git://yorba.org/shotwell >> >> on your system, and then building as usual with >> >> $ ./configure >> $ make >> # make install >> >> For Ubuntu users, the Shotwell daily builds PPA is located here: >> https://launchpad.net/~yorba/+archive/daily-builds >> >> As always, we suggest backing up your Shotwell database before testing >> pre-release code. You can learn how to do this by reading the "How can >> I back up my Shotwell library?" section of the Shotwell FAQ here: >> http://redmine.yorba.org/projects/shotwell/wiki/ShotwellFAQ >> >> Cheers, >> Lucas >> >> ----------------------- >> Lucas Beeler >> Shotwell Technical Lead >> Yorba Foundation >> San Francisco, California >> _______________________________________________ >> Shotwell mailing list >> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From clinton at yorba.org Thu Mar 14 19:47:19 2013 From: clinton at yorba.org (Clint Rogers) Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 12:47:19 -0700 Subject: [Shotwell] Call for Testing: Shotwell 0.14 In-Reply-To: <1363176440.2747.5.camel@medjed> References: <1363176440.2747.5.camel@medjed> Message-ID: Good morning ?????, > 1.It is much better RAW handling during the input, but I still have > separate "photo.cr2 + photo_cr2_shotwell.jpg + photo.jpg" pairs in my > database. Is this with existing images that you're seeing this, or new imports? If it's with existing ones, unfortunately, Shotwell doesn't yet know how to match up separated RAWs and JPEGs, although this is something we hope to fix in the future; please see http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/3968 for more details about this. If you're seeing it on new imports, this is definitely a bug, and we'd be interested in hearing more about how it's happening. > 2. Also, during the time, the Shotwell has become terribly slow for a > 5-10 min since the startup due to some meta-data checking: > > L 2627 2013-03-13 12:56:08 [CRT] Upper boundary of data for directory > Canon, entry 0x009a is out of bounds: Offset = 0x00004d14, size = 80, > exceeds buffer size by 14 Bytes; truncating the entry These checks have always occurred as part of EXIF reading; we modified Shotwell slightly to report more of these kinds of errors (this message in particular is from libgexiv2, which tends to be a bit verbose when it finds something in an image that it doesn't quite like). As for slow performance and/or metadata reading and writing when the application is first started, are you seeing this every time, and does the metadata progress bar ever complete? If not, then you may be seeing an alternate case of http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4297, and we definitely need to know about this. Thank you for taking time to let us know about what you're seeing. If you have any other feedback, please let us know. Cheers, -c From clanlaw at googlemail.com Thu Mar 14 19:49:33 2013 From: clanlaw at googlemail.com (Colin Law) Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 19:49:33 +0000 Subject: [Shotwell] Importing video In-Reply-To: References: <513e4769.e8c4440a.6387.7e3d@mx.google.com> Message-ID: On 12 March 2013 23:30, Lucas Beeler wrote: >> A couple of questions, is the intention >> that 0.14.0 will be included in Raring >> when that is released? > > 0.14.0 should indeed be included in Raring. We issued a Preview > Release tarball to Canonical before their feature freeze. Likewise, > features in Shotwell 0.14.0 are now frozen (as of March 4, when we > issued Preview Release 1), but we'll continue to fix bugs 'til the > final release of 0.14.0, which should come in the next few weeks. > >> Also are there any changes in the >> database format between 0.13 and >> 0.14? > > Yes. > >> share the db and photos between >> two machines (one of which is on >> Ubuntu 12.04) > > Shotwell 0.14.0 should run on Ubuntu 12.04 provided you install > GStreamer 1.0 from the GStreamer Developers PPA > (https://launchpad.net/~gstreamer-developers/+archive/ppa). Since I will have to build from source at some point to build for 12.04 I will build it for Raring and give it a go. Thanks Colin From gpopac at gmail.com Fri Mar 15 00:18:26 2013 From: gpopac at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9C=D0=B8=D0=BB=D0=BE=D1=88_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9F=D0=BE=D0=BF=D0=BE=D0=B2=D0=B8=D1=9B?=) Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 01:18:26 +0100 Subject: [Shotwell] Call for Testing: Shotwell 0.14 In-Reply-To: References: <1363176440.2747.5.camel@medjed> Message-ID: <1363306706.6475.18.camel@medjed> Good morning Clint and thank you for the reply. > Is this with existing images that you're seeing this, or new imports? > > If it's with existing ones, unfortunately, Shotwell doesn't yet know > how to match up separated RAWs and JPEGs, although this is something > we hope to fix in the future; please see > http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/3968 for more details about this. > > If you're seeing it on new imports, this is definitely a bug, and we'd > be interested in hearing more about how it's happening. It only happened with the old photos from the database, that were already imported as miss-paired ones. Indeed it looks like Shotwell handles new imports much better now. I did?t have any problems with this. > These checks have always occurred as part of EXIF reading; we modified > Shotwell slightly to report more of these kinds of errors (this > message in particular is from libgexiv2, which tends to be a bit > verbose when it finds something in an image that it doesn't quite > like). As for slow performance and/or metadata reading and writing > when the application is first started, are you seeing this every time, > and does the metadata progress bar ever complete? If not, then you > may be seeing an alternate case of > http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4297, and we definitely need to know > about this. > > Thank you for taking time to let us know about what you're seeing. If > you have any other feedback, please let us know. I had the problem from Bug#4297, but it is fixed with 0.13 for me. Shotwell does not popup "Writing metadata" progres bar while this is happending. Starting up the program I get "Refreshing database" and "Importing photos" progres bars for just a short time (1 sec). After this Shotwell is using my external HDD very intensively for about 5 minutes (tried both NTFS and ext4 file systems). All operations are very slow during this period and I am not able to delete photo, export image, etc. When the HDD finally stops spinning everything is OK. Best regards, Milo? From lucas at yorba.org Fri Mar 15 19:12:33 2013 From: lucas at yorba.org (Lucas Beeler) Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 12:12:33 -0700 Subject: [Shotwell] Shotwell In-Reply-To: <514344DA.6040005@oxfordcontinuity.com> References: <514344DA.6040005@oxfordcontinuity.com> Message-ID: Hi Paul, > How do I set Shotwell to start-up automatically in slideshow? > > (Or do I always need to press F5?) As of right now, you can't configure Shotwell to be launched in any sort of "slideshow only" mode. That said, we do see possible applications for this and have created a feature request for it on our bug tracking system here: http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/6583. Lucas From moejoeblue at gmail.com Fri Mar 15 19:53:59 2013 From: moejoeblue at gmail.com (Moe Blue) Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 20:53:59 +0100 Subject: [Shotwell] Call for Testing: Shotwell 0.14 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <51437C57.4080601@gmail.com> Hi, thank you! I'm really looking foreward the RAW fixes. Are there any database changes? Can I just move my pictures folder plus database over to my testing PC? (shotwell 0.13.1 to 0.14pre from the PPA). best Moe Am 13.03.2013 02:24, schrieb Lucas Beeler: > Hi Shotwell Fans, > > Shotwell 0.14.0 is soon to be released! This upcoming version of > Shotwell packs a ton of new features, including: > > * A folder tree in the sidebar provides a directory-hierarchy view of > your Shotwell library > > * Dramatically improved user experience for RAW > photographers?long-standing bugs involving RAW developer switching > have been fixed > > * Comprehensive logging of photo and video import, including the > ability to save an import log file to disk. The log tracks which files > were detected as duplicates as well as files that couldn't be imported > due to disk or camera problems. > > * The Facebook Connector now uses the Facebook Graph API, resulting in > a smoother, more stable experience uploading photos and videos to > Facebook. As a bonus, Shotwell photo titles now appear as Facebook > photo captions! > > * The Shotwell video subsystem now relies on GStreamer 1.0, making for > easier, more stable video import, better video thumbnails, and better > handling of video metadata > > * New slideshow effects, improved Piwigo support, the ability to show > and hide the main Shotwell sidebar, and more... > > You can help us make Shotwell 0.14.0 the most stable Shotwell ever by > downloading the current development snapshot and testing it. To get > and test the latest code, you'll need to either pull from Shotwell git > master and build from source or, if you're on Ubuntu, install a > Shotwell daily build from the Yorba daily builds PPA. > > Pulling from Shotwell git master should be as easy as executing > > $ git clone git://yorba.org/shotwell > > on your system, and then building as usual with > > $ ./configure > $ make > # make install > > For Ubuntu users, the Shotwell daily builds PPA is located here: > https://launchpad.net/~yorba/+archive/daily-builds > > As always, we suggest backing up your Shotwell database before testing > pre-release code. You can learn how to do this by reading the "How can > I back up my Shotwell library?" section of the Shotwell FAQ here: > http://redmine.yorba.org/projects/shotwell/wiki/ShotwellFAQ > > Cheers, > Lucas > > ----------------------- > Lucas Beeler > Shotwell Technical Lead > Yorba Foundation > San Francisco, California > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > From jim at yorba.org Fri Mar 15 20:05:02 2013 From: jim at yorba.org (Jim Nelson) Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 13:05:02 -0700 Subject: [Shotwell] Call for Testing: Shotwell 0.14 In-Reply-To: <51437C57.4080601@gmail.com> References: <51437C57.4080601@gmail.com> Message-ID: When testing, we highly recommend backing up your old database to ensure you can revert later: http://redmine.yorba.org/projects/shotwell/wiki/ShotwellFAQ#How-can-I-back-up-my-Shotwell-library -- Jim On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Moe Blue wrote: > Hi, > > thank you! I'm really looking foreward the RAW fixes. Are there any > database changes? Can I just move my pictures folder plus database over to > my testing PC? (shotwell 0.13.1 to 0.14pre from the PPA). > > best > Moe > > Am 13.03.2013 02:24, schrieb Lucas Beeler: > > Hi Shotwell Fans, >> >> Shotwell 0.14.0 is soon to be released! This upcoming version of >> Shotwell packs a ton of new features, including: >> >> * A folder tree in the sidebar provides a directory-hierarchy view of >> your Shotwell library >> >> * Dramatically improved user experience for RAW >> photographers?long-standing bugs involving RAW developer switching >> have been fixed >> >> * Comprehensive logging of photo and video import, including the >> ability to save an import log file to disk. The log tracks which files >> were detected as duplicates as well as files that couldn't be imported >> due to disk or camera problems. >> >> * The Facebook Connector now uses the Facebook Graph API, resulting in >> a smoother, more stable experience uploading photos and videos to >> Facebook. As a bonus, Shotwell photo titles now appear as Facebook >> photo captions! >> >> * The Shotwell video subsystem now relies on GStreamer 1.0, making for >> easier, more stable video import, better video thumbnails, and better >> handling of video metadata >> >> * New slideshow effects, improved Piwigo support, the ability to show >> and hide the main Shotwell sidebar, and more... >> >> You can help us make Shotwell 0.14.0 the most stable Shotwell ever by >> downloading the current development snapshot and testing it. To get >> and test the latest code, you'll need to either pull from Shotwell git >> master and build from source or, if you're on Ubuntu, install a >> Shotwell daily build from the Yorba daily builds PPA. >> >> Pulling from Shotwell git master should be as easy as executing >> >> $ git clone git://yorba.org/shotwell >> >> on your system, and then building as usual with >> >> $ ./configure >> $ make >> # make install >> >> For Ubuntu users, the Shotwell daily builds PPA is located here: >> https://launchpad.net/~yorba/+**archive/daily-builds >> >> As always, we suggest backing up your Shotwell database before testing >> pre-release code. You can learn how to do this by reading the "How can >> I back up my Shotwell library?" section of the Shotwell FAQ here: >> http://redmine.yorba.org/**projects/shotwell/wiki/**ShotwellFAQ >> >> Cheers, >> Lucas >> >> ----------------------- >> Lucas Beeler >> Shotwell Technical Lead >> Yorba Foundation >> San Francisco, California >> ______________________________**_________________ >> Shotwell mailing list >> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-**bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell >> >> > ______________________________**_________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-**bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > From nixphoeni at gmail.com Sat Mar 16 01:22:59 2013 From: nixphoeni at gmail.com (Joe Sapp) Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 21:22:59 -0400 Subject: [Shotwell] File information about a publishable Message-ID: Hi, Is there a way for a plugin to get file information about a publishable? I'm specifically looking for video container and encoding. Thanks, Joe Sapp From clanlaw at googlemail.com Sat Mar 16 13:42:23 2013 From: clanlaw at googlemail.com (Colin Law) Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2013 13:42:23 +0000 Subject: [Shotwell] Importing video In-Reply-To: References: <513e4769.e8c4440a.6387.7e3d@mx.google.com> Message-ID: On 11 March 2013 23:48, Lucas Beeler wrote: > Hi Colin, > > You're a power user and a regular contributor to the Shotwell mailing > list, so I hope you don't mind if I get a little technical on you. ;-) > As you probably know, Shotwell 0.14.0 is due out soon. All of the code > in Shotwell 0.14.0s video handling subsystem is linked against > GStreamer 1.0, whereas all of the code in Shotwell 0.13.1 is linked > against GStreamer 0.10. The errors you're seeing above are definitely > generated by GStreamer, so what I think is going on here is a > GStreamer version mismatch. Insofar as we've been able to tell, Ubuntu > Raring uses GStreamer 1.0 throughout its entire media stack, but > Shotwell 0.13.0 is a GStreamer 0.10-based application. Put briefly, I > think that most of your problems will go away if you just upgrade to > Shotwell 0.14.0. Now, while it's true Shotwell 0.14.0 isn't out yet, a > pre-release tarball is available here: > http://www.yorba.org/download/shotwell/0.14/shotwell-0.14.0pr1.tar.xz. > You'll have to build from source after download the tarball, of > course. I have built 0.14 from git source and the problem is fixed. Many thanks Colin From moejoeblue at gmail.com Sat Mar 16 20:26:20 2013 From: moejoeblue at gmail.com (Moe Blue) Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2013 21:26:20 +0100 Subject: [Shotwell] Call for Testing: Shotwell 0.14 In-Reply-To: <1363306706.6475.18.camel@medjed> References: <1363176440.2747.5.camel@medjed> <1363306706.6475.18.camel@medjed> Message-ID: <5144D56C.3090400@gmail.com> Hi there > > It only happened with the old photos from the database, that were > already imported as miss-paired ones. > Have you found a way to re-combine miss-paired ones? I tied the following: 1. copied a set of mis-paired RAW+JPEG from the pictures folder over to a DCIM folder on my camera 2. moved the set of Photos to trash inside shotwell. empty trash inside shotwell (and delete files) 3. removed remaining files from my pictures folder 4. removed *_shotwell and *_embedded files from the DCIM folder on my camera. (now only the original .ARW and the _ARW.jpg are left). 5. did a new import from camera. did non work :( that is, files are not paired properly. Still, RAW and JPEG are imported separately and embedded jpeg will be extracted. Is that because the JPEG files were renamed to P000000_ARW.jpg and I have to set every JPEG back to P000000.JPG, how filenames look usually out ouf camera? Or are any traces to the files and the development settings left back from the first wrong import? I thought these were cleared out of the database in step 2. best Moe > Indeed it looks like Shotwell handles new imports much better now. I > did?t have any problems with this. > >> These checks have always occurred as part of EXIF reading; we modified >> Shotwell slightly to report more of these kinds of errors (this >> message in particular is from libgexiv2, which tends to be a bit >> verbose when it finds something in an image that it doesn't quite >> like). As for slow performance and/or metadata reading and writing >> when the application is first started, are you seeing this every time, >> and does the metadata progress bar ever complete? If not, then you >> may be seeing an alternate case of >> http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4297, and we definitely need to know >> about this. >> >> Thank you for taking time to let us know about what you're seeing. If >> you have any other feedback, please let us know. > > I had the problem from Bug#4297, but it is fixed with 0.13 for me. > > Shotwell does not popup "Writing metadata" progres bar while this is > happending. Starting up the program I get "Refreshing database" and > "Importing photos" progres bars for just a short time (1 sec). > > After this Shotwell is using my external HDD very intensively for about > 5 minutes (tried both NTFS and ext4 file systems). All operations are > very slow during this period and I am not able to delete photo, export > image, etc. When the HDD finally stops spinning everything is OK. > > > Best regards, > Milo? > > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > From izidor.matusov at gmail.com Sun Mar 17 12:15:21 2013 From: izidor.matusov at gmail.com (=?windows-1252?Q?Izidor_Matu=9Aov?=) Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 13:15:21 +0100 Subject: [Shotwell] Event names in folder structures Message-ID: <5145B3D9.8080506@gmail.com> Hi, first of all I would like to say thank you for such an awesome app as Shotwell! All of my photos are managed exclusively by Shotwell only... and I am concerned what could happen when my ~/.local/share/shotwell goes corrupt. There is already a feature request: http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/3549 I would like to ask about the state of the request. Are any of developers going to work on it in the close future? If not, I would like to work on a patch for it and contribute it to the project. I have already started reading wiki for new contributors. However, there is not so much about creating a specification for a feature. I mean something like if it will be included in core feature set or should be implemented as a plugin. Is it let on the patch author to decide and later convince others? Is brainstorming and creating a spec on the mailing list prior coding appropriate? Thanks for the clarification! Izidor From tntwormz at gmail.com Mon Mar 18 17:39:24 2013 From: tntwormz at gmail.com (Tibor Bors) Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 18:39:24 +0100 Subject: [Shotwell] Fwd: Resetting Picasa account In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Shotwellers, I'm coping with an HTTP 400 error from Picasa side, so I was thinking about to change or reset my account, but I couldn't find any option for this. How can I solve it? Thanks in advance, Tibor From lucas at yorba.org Mon Mar 18 17:41:06 2013 From: lucas at yorba.org (Lucas Beeler) Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 10:41:06 -0700 Subject: [Shotwell] File information about a publishable Message-ID: > Is there a way for a plugin to > get file information about a publishable? > I'm specifically looking for video > container and encoding. There is a way to query information about publishables, but we don't currently store any video meta-information. We do have a ticket for doing so, however: http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4173. Cheers, Lucas From lucas at yorba.org Mon Mar 18 17:43:58 2013 From: lucas at yorba.org (Lucas Beeler) Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 10:43:58 -0700 Subject: [Shotwell] Fwd: Resetting Picasa account In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: > I'm coping with an HTTP 400 error from Picasa side This is actually a Shotwell problem. It was impossible to properly log out of the Picasa Connector until just a few days ago. This issue is fixed in Shotwell 0.14.0, which should reach general availability in a day or two. In the meantime, feel free to pull git master and build from source. Lucas On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Tibor Bors wrote: > Hi Shotwellers, > > I'm coping with an HTTP 400 error from Picasa side, so I was thinking about > to change or reset my account, but I couldn't find any option for this. How > can I solve it? > > Thanks in advance, > Tibor > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From clinton at yorba.org Mon Mar 18 18:12:05 2013 From: clinton at yorba.org (Clint Rogers) Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 14:12:05 -0400 Subject: [Shotwell] Call for Testing: Shotwell 0.14 In-Reply-To: <5144D56C.3090400@gmail.com> References: <1363176440.2747.5.camel@medjed> <1363306706.6475.18.camel@medjed> <5144D56C.3090400@gmail.com> Message-ID: Hi Moe, > Is that because the JPEG files were renamed to P000000_ARW.jpg and > I have to set every JPEG back to P000000.JPG, how filenames look > usually out of camera? Yes, that's exactly it; Shotwell 'expects' the part of the filename before the extension to match, so with P000000.ARW, 'P000000_ARW.jpg' won't be paired, but 'P000000.JPG' will. I hope this helps you out, but if you have any other questions, please let us know. Cheers, -c On 16 March 2013 16:26, Moe Blue wrote: > Hi there > > > >> It only happened with the old photos from the database, that were >> already imported as miss-paired ones. >> >> > Have you found a way to re-combine miss-paired ones? > > I tied the following: > > 1. copied a set of mis-paired RAW+JPEG from the pictures folder over to a > DCIM folder on my camera > 2. moved the set of Photos to trash inside shotwell. empty trash inside > shotwell (and delete files) > 3. removed remaining files from my pictures folder > 4. removed *_shotwell and *_embedded files from the DCIM folder on my > camera. (now only the original .ARW and the _ARW.jpg are left). > 5. did a new import from camera. > > did non work :( that is, files are not paired properly. Still, RAW and > JPEG are imported separately and embedded jpeg will be extracted. > > Is that because the JPEG files were renamed to P000000_ARW.jpg and I have > to set every JPEG back to P000000.JPG, how filenames look usually out ouf > camera? Or are any traces to the files and the development settings left > back from the first wrong import? I thought these were cleared out of the > database in step 2. > > best > Moe > > > > > > Indeed it looks like Shotwell handles new imports much better now. I >> did?t have any problems with this. >> >> These checks have always occurred as part of EXIF reading; we modified >>> Shotwell slightly to report more of these kinds of errors (this >>> message in particular is from libgexiv2, which tends to be a bit >>> verbose when it finds something in an image that it doesn't quite >>> like). As for slow performance and/or metadata reading and writing >>> when the application is first started, are you seeing this every time, >>> and does the metadata progress bar ever complete? If not, then you >>> may be seeing an alternate case of >>> http://redmine.yorba.org/**issues/4297, >>> and we definitely need to know >>> about this. >>> >>> Thank you for taking time to let us know about what you're seeing. If >>> you have any other feedback, please let us know. >>> >> >> I had the problem from Bug#4297, but it is fixed with 0.13 for me. >> >> Shotwell does not popup "Writing metadata" progres bar while this is >> happending. Starting up the program I get "Refreshing database" and >> "Importing photos" progres bars for just a short time (1 sec). >> >> After this Shotwell is using my external HDD very intensively for about >> 5 minutes (tried both NTFS and ext4 file systems). All operations are >> very slow during this period and I am not able to delete photo, export >> image, etc. When the HDD finally stops spinning everything is OK. >> >> >> Best regards, >> Milo? >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> Shotwell mailing list >> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-**bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell >> >> > ______________________________**_________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-**bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > -- --------------------------- "I asked if Sodium, Bromine and Oxygen wanted to hang out, but they were like 'Na Br O'..." From jim at yorba.org Mon Mar 18 20:13:21 2013 From: jim at yorba.org (Jim Nelson) Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 20:06:21 -0007 Subject: [Shotwell] Event names in folder structures In-Reply-To: <5145B3D9.8080506@gmail.com> References: <5145B3D9.8080506@gmail.com> Message-ID: <51477549.41e8440a.4f2d.ffffc450@mx.google.com> Hi Izidor, Thanks for your kind words. ?No, no one is assigned to that ticket yet. ?If you'd like to take a crack it, that would be great! Right now, our plugin architecture wouldn't allow for something like this to be implemented. ?You would need to add this to the core of Shotwell. In addition to our wiki pages for contributors, I would read over the ticket closely and see what's being asked for. ?Before coding up a patch, I suggest adding to the ticket a comment that explains what you'd like to do (in essence, a proposal) and make sure we're on board. ?Others may want to comment as well. ?That way you're not running one direction when we're expecting something different. I hope that clears things up! -- Jim On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 5:15 AM, Izidor Matu?ov wrote: > Hi, > > first of all I would like to say thank you for such an awesome app as > Shotwell! All of my photos are managed exclusively by Shotwell > only... and I am concerned what could happen when my > ~/.local/share/shotwell goes corrupt. There is already a feature > request: > > http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/3549 > > I would like to ask about the state of the request. Are any of > developers going to work on it in the close future? If not, I would > like to work on a patch for it and contribute it to the project. > > I have already started reading wiki for new contributors. However, > there is not so much about creating a specification for a feature. I > mean something like if it will be included in core feature set or > should be implemented as a plugin. Is it let on the patch author to > decide and later convince others? Is brainstorming and creating a > spec on the mailing list prior coding appropriate? > > Thanks for the clarification! > > Izidor > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From clinton at yorba.org Mon Mar 18 20:49:20 2013 From: clinton at yorba.org (Clint Rogers) Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 13:49:20 -0700 Subject: [Shotwell] Re-create certain thumbnail In-Reply-To: References: <513B5736.1070609@gmail.com> Message-ID: Hi Thomas, Are you still having problems with this? Please let us know. Also, just to reconfirm, you have the version of plugins-bad for 1.0 installed already, right? Cheers, -c On 12/03/2013, Thomas Novin wrote: > Not very good I guess, I already have "bad thumbnails" so they are not > empty. > > https://xyz.pp.se/~thnov/up/Screenshot%20from%202013-03-12%2017:44:09.png > > However, I still get gray thumbnails on certain videos when I import > new ones, even after the issue was closed. But still all is good in > Nautilus. > > Rgds//Thomas > > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Clint Rogers wrote: >> Hi Thomas, >> >> What should happen is that, if you install or update one or more >> GStreamer codecs, Shotwell should pick up on this the next time it's >> launched, and attempt to thumbnail any video files for which it >> doesn't have thumbnails already. There shouldn't be any need to blow >> away your other good thumbnails, though. >> >> Can you try this and let us know if it works? >> >> Cheers, >> -c >> >> >> On 11/03/2013, Thomas Novin wrote: >>> My issue is with video-files so I don't think I can do rotate there. >>> >>> Any other suggestion? Since I have a 20-30k+ library it seems a bit >>> hefty to remove all thumbnails just to re-create 100 :) >>> >>> Rgds//Thomas >>> >>> On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Joseph Bylund >>> wrote: >>>> Thomas, >>>> I believe rotate-undo works, the original message says it does not work >>>> for >>>> raw files. >>>> http://lists.yorba.org/pipermail/shotwell/2011-November/003309.html >>>> -Joe >>>> >>>> On 03/09/2013 07:48 AM, Thomas Novin wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hello >>>>> >>>>> Is it possible to re-generate thumbnails for just some file(s)? I have >>>>> some bad thumbnails because of Bug #6452 but I want to re-generate >>>>> them when I have the fixed version of Shotwell. >>>>> >>>>> Rgds//Thomas >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Shotwell mailing list >>>>> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >>>>> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell >>>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Shotwell mailing list >>> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >>> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell >>> >> >> >> -- >> --------------------------- >> "I asked if Sodium, Bromine and Oxygen wanted to hang out, but they >> were like 'Na Br O'..." > -- --------------------------- "I asked if Sodium, Bromine and Oxygen wanted to hang out, but they were like 'Na Br O'..." From clinton at yorba.org Tue Mar 19 00:16:43 2013 From: clinton at yorba.org (Clint Rogers) Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 17:16:43 -0700 Subject: [Shotwell] Shotwell 0.14.0 Released Message-ID: Dood evening, one and all, It's my privelege to announce the release of Shotwell 0.14; the download, as well as installation instructions are available at http://yorba.org/shotwell/install.html, and Ubuntu users may get it from our PPA at https://launchpad.net/~yorba/+archive/ppa. Among the many enhancements and fixes this release brings are: * Greatly-improved RAW support - several glaring bugs have been corrected. * A directory-hierarchy view of the user's Shotwell library in the sidebar. * Logging of image import failures and their causes; the contents of the log may be saved to a file. * The Facebook Connector now uses the Facebook Graph API, resulting in a smoother, more stable experience uploading photos and videos to Facebook and the ability to use photo titles as captions. * Migration to GStreamer 1.0, bringing better handling of video data, better thumbnailing, and better stability. * Several new slideshow effects. * Fixes for several crashes (most notably http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/5992). If you have any questions regarding this release, please feel free to respond to this message, and either I or another member of the Shotwell team will respond as soon as we can. On behalf of the team here, thank you for using Shotwell! Cheers, -c From clanlaw at googlemail.com Tue Mar 19 10:13:47 2013 From: clanlaw at googlemail.com (Colin Law) Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 10:13:47 +0000 Subject: [Shotwell] Shotwell 0.14.0 Released In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On 19 March 2013 00:16, Clint Rogers wrote: > Dood evening, one and all, > > It's my privelege to announce the release of Shotwell 0.14; the > download, as well as installation instructions are available at > http://yorba.org/shotwell/install.html, and Ubuntu users may get it > from our PPA at https://launchpad.net/~yorba/+archive/ppa. > Among the many enhancements and fixes this release brings are: On 12.04 (32 bit), with the ppa enabled, sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get dist-upgrade is not giving me shotwell 0.14. It is, however, showing libgexiv2-1 held back, I see: $ apt-cache policy libgexiv2-1 libgexiv2-1: Installed: 0.4.1-1build1 Candidate: 0.6.0-0precise1 Version table: 0.6.0-0precise1 0 500 http://ppa.launchpad.net/yorba/ppa/ubuntu/ precise/main i386 Packages *** 0.4.1-1build1 0 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main i386 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status and $ apt-cache policy shotwell shotwell: Installed: 0.13.1-1~precise1 Candidate: 0.13.1-1~precise1 Version table: *** 0.13.1-1~precise1 0 500 http://ppa.launchpad.net/yorba/ppa/ubuntu/ precise/main i386 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 0.12.3-0ubuntu0.1 0 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates/main i386 Packages 0.12.2-0ubuntu2 0 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main i386 Packages The ppa was previously enabled which is why 1.13.1 is currently installed. Is that likely to be a problem with the ppa or with my system? I am hesitating to try sudo apt-get install libgexiv2-1 in case it breaks something. Colin From clanlaw at googlemail.com Tue Mar 19 13:51:14 2013 From: clanlaw at googlemail.com (Colin Law) Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 13:51:14 +0000 Subject: [Shotwell] Shotwell 0.14.0 Released In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On 19 March 2013 10:13, Colin Law wrote: > On 19 March 2013 00:16, Clint Rogers wrote: >> Dood evening, one and all, >> >> It's my privelege to announce the release of Shotwell 0.14; the >> download, as well as installation instructions are available at >> http://yorba.org/shotwell/install.html, and Ubuntu users may get it >> from our PPA at https://launchpad.net/~yorba/+archive/ppa. >> Among the many enhancements and fixes this release brings are: > > On 12.04 (32 bit), with the ppa enabled, sudo apt-get update && sudo > apt-get dist-upgrade is not giving me shotwell 0.14. It is, however, > showing libgexiv2-1 held back, I see: > > $ apt-cache policy libgexiv2-1 > libgexiv2-1: > Installed: 0.4.1-1build1 > Candidate: 0.6.0-0precise1 > Version table: > 0.6.0-0precise1 0 > 500 http://ppa.launchpad.net/yorba/ppa/ubuntu/ precise/main > i386 Packages > *** 0.4.1-1build1 0 > 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main i386 Packages > 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > > and > > $ apt-cache policy shotwell > shotwell: > Installed: 0.13.1-1~precise1 > Candidate: 0.13.1-1~precise1 > Version table: > *** 0.13.1-1~precise1 0 > 500 http://ppa.launchpad.net/yorba/ppa/ubuntu/ precise/main > i386 Packages > 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > 0.12.3-0ubuntu0.1 0 > 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates/main > i386 Packages > 0.12.2-0ubuntu2 0 > 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main i386 Packages I have now tried this on another machine running 12.04 and am seeing the same issue. Colin From clanlaw at googlemail.com Tue Mar 19 15:17:17 2013 From: clanlaw at googlemail.com (Colin Law) Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 15:17:17 +0000 Subject: [Shotwell] Shotwell 0.14.0 Released In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On 19 March 2013 13:51, Colin Law wrote: > On 19 March 2013 10:13, Colin Law wrote: >> On 19 March 2013 00:16, Clint Rogers wrote: >>> Dood evening, one and all, >>> >>> It's my privelege to announce the release of Shotwell 0.14; the >>> download, as well as installation instructions are available at >>> http://yorba.org/shotwell/install.html, and Ubuntu users may get it >>> from our PPA at https://launchpad.net/~yorba/+archive/ppa. >>> Among the many enhancements and fixes this release brings are: >> >> On 12.04 (32 bit), with the ppa enabled, sudo apt-get update && sudo >> apt-get dist-upgrade is not giving me shotwell 0.14. csola48 has pointed out there were build failures on the build for Precise: Packages in ?yorba?: shotwell - 0.14.0-1~precise1 (changes file) lucas-yorba 17 hours ago Published Precise Gnome There were *build failures. amd64 i386* Colin From onefiftyfour at hotmail.com Tue Mar 19 16:35:48 2013 From: onefiftyfour at hotmail.com (eric L) Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 11:35:48 -0500 Subject: [Shotwell] Shotwell 0.14.0 Released In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: >From the install page for Fedora - "Shotwell 0.14 will ship as the default photo manager on Fedora Core 18." Is this really true? Fedora 18 was released back in January. Fedora 18 has these packages available: gstreamer1-devel gstreamer1-plugins-base-devel But these are not in Fedora 17 repos that I can find. Is it safe to install these packages from the Fedora 18 repo on my Fedora 17 machine? -Eric > Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 17:16:43 -0700 > From: clinton at yorba.org > To: announce at lists.yorba.org; shotwell at lists.yorba.org > Subject: [Shotwell] Shotwell 0.14.0 Released > > Dood evening, one and all, > > It's my privelege to announce the release of Shotwell 0.14; the > download, as well as installation instructions are available at > http://yorba.org/shotwell/install.html, and Ubuntu users may get it > from our PPA at https://launchpad.net/~yorba/+archive/ppa. > Among the many enhancements and fixes this release brings are: > > * Greatly-improved RAW support - several glaring bugs have been corrected. > * A directory-hierarchy view of the user's Shotwell library in the sidebar. > * Logging of image import failures and their causes; the contents of > the log may be saved to a file. > * The Facebook Connector now uses the Facebook Graph API, resulting in > a smoother, more stable experience uploading photos and videos to > Facebook and the ability to use photo titles as captions. > * Migration to GStreamer 1.0, bringing better handling of video data, > better thumbnailing, and better stability. > * Several new slideshow effects. > * Fixes for several crashes (most notably http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/5992). > > If you have any questions regarding this release, please feel free to > respond to this message, and either I or another member of the > Shotwell team will respond as soon as we can. > > On behalf of the team here, thank you for using Shotwell! > > Cheers, > -c > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From chris at gurgiolo.com Tue Mar 19 19:14:30 2013 From: chris at gurgiolo.com (Chris Gurgiolo) Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 12:14:30 -0700 Subject: [Shotwell] Shotwell 0.14.0 saving configuration Message-ID: <1363720470.15663.9.camel@b2r> Hi, I just updated to shotwell 0.14.0 on a gentoo system. When I change view settings to match how I like to see things, the settings don't appear to be saved. That is when I exit and restart shotwell I am back to the default settings (no sidebar etc.) How do I get the settings to be saved? If I know where they are set I can change them manually. Also, for what it's worth the slideshow options don't appear to work. I can get a slideshow but the transition appears to stay at NONE no matter what I select and there is no title even when I ask for it to be included. Thanks in advance for any help. chris -- Chris Gurgiolo Bitterroot Basic Research Inc. 837 Westside Road Hamilton, MT 59840-9369 Phone: (406)363-6163 E-Mail: chris at gurgiolo.com From thomas at xyz.pp.se Tue Mar 19 22:02:34 2013 From: thomas at xyz.pp.se (Thomas Novin) Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 23:02:34 +0100 Subject: [Shotwell] Re-create certain thumbnail In-Reply-To: References: <513B5736.1070609@gmail.com> Message-ID: Hello Yes, I still have the problem. Some .mp4-files generates grey thumbnails. Just now I imported 43 files. About 25% of them where gray (like mosaic). All good in Nautilus as usual. $ dpkg -l | grep gstream | egrep '1.0-plugins-|plugins-bad1' ii gstreamer1.0-plugins-base:i386 1.0.5-1~ubuntu12.10.1~ppa5 i386 GStreamer plugins from the "base" set ii gstreamer1.0-plugins-good:i386 1.0.5-1ubuntu1~ubuntu12.10.1~ppa4 i386 GStreamer plugins from the "good" set ii gstreamer1.0-plugins-ugly:i386 1.0.5-1~ubuntu12.10.1~ppa1 i386 GStreamer plugins from the "ugly" set ii libgstreamer-plugins-bad1.0-0:i386 1.0.5-1ubuntu1~ubuntu12.10.1~ppa3 i386 GStreamer development files for libraries from the "bad" set If I remove all these imported files and do it again, the same files will get bad thumbnails also the next time. Rgds//Thomas On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Clint Rogers wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > Are you still having problems with this? Please let us know. > > Also, just to reconfirm, you have the version of plugins-bad for 1.0 > installed already, right? > > Cheers, > -c > > On 12/03/2013, Thomas Novin wrote: >> Not very good I guess, I already have "bad thumbnails" so they are not >> empty. >> >> https://xyz.pp.se/~thnov/up/Screenshot%20from%202013-03-12%2017:44:09.png >> >> However, I still get gray thumbnails on certain videos when I import >> new ones, even after the issue was closed. But still all is good in >> Nautilus. >> >> Rgds//Thomas >> >> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Clint Rogers wrote: >>> Hi Thomas, >>> >>> What should happen is that, if you install or update one or more >>> GStreamer codecs, Shotwell should pick up on this the next time it's >>> launched, and attempt to thumbnail any video files for which it >>> doesn't have thumbnails already. There shouldn't be any need to blow >>> away your other good thumbnails, though. >>> >>> Can you try this and let us know if it works? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> -c >>> >>> >>> On 11/03/2013, Thomas Novin wrote: >>>> My issue is with video-files so I don't think I can do rotate there. >>>> >>>> Any other suggestion? Since I have a 20-30k+ library it seems a bit >>>> hefty to remove all thumbnails just to re-create 100 :) >>>> >>>> Rgds//Thomas >>>> >>>> On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Joseph Bylund >>>> wrote: >>>>> Thomas, >>>>> I believe rotate-undo works, the original message says it does not work >>>>> for >>>>> raw files. >>>>> http://lists.yorba.org/pipermail/shotwell/2011-November/003309.html >>>>> -Joe >>>>> >>>>> On 03/09/2013 07:48 AM, Thomas Novin wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hello >>>>>> >>>>>> Is it possible to re-generate thumbnails for just some file(s)? I have >>>>>> some bad thumbnails because of Bug #6452 but I want to re-generate >>>>>> them when I have the fixed version of Shotwell. >>>>>> >>>>>> Rgds//Thomas >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Shotwell mailing list >>>>>> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >>>>>> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell >>>>> >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Shotwell mailing list >>>> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >>>> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> --------------------------- >>> "I asked if Sodium, Bromine and Oxygen wanted to hang out, but they >>> were like 'Na Br O'..." >> > > > -- > --------------------------- > "I asked if Sodium, Bromine and Oxygen wanted to hang out, but they > were like 'Na Br O'..." From clinton at yorba.org Tue Mar 19 22:08:19 2013 From: clinton at yorba.org (Clint Rogers) Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 15:08:19 -0700 Subject: [Shotwell] Shotwell 0.14.0 Released In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Eric, > From the install page for Fedora - "Shotwell 0.14 will ship as the default > photo manager on Fedora Core 18." > > Is this really true? Fedora 18 was released back in January. > Thank you for calling this to our attention; it was a factual error and has been corrected. > Fedora 18 has these packages available: > ... > But these are not in Fedora 17 repos that I can find. Is it safe to > install these packages from the Fedora 18 repo on my Fedora 17 > machine? This hasn't been tested by us, so I cannot officially recommend it, although I suspect it might work, especially since GStreamer 0.10 and 1.0 can safely coexist on the same computer. The current recommendation is for FC17 users to upgrade, if possible; barring that, it's possible to build GStreamer from source; please see http://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/data/doc/gstreamer/head/faq/html/chapter-getting.html#getting-gstreamer-source for details. We do apologize for the inconvenience caused by the incorrect instructions that were posted earlier. Thank you again for calling these to our attention, and if you have any other questions or comments, please let us know. Cheers, -c > On 19 March 2013 12:35, eric L wrote: From clinton at yorba.org Tue Mar 19 22:24:38 2013 From: clinton at yorba.org (Clint Rogers) Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 15:24:38 -0700 Subject: [Shotwell] Re-create certain thumbnail In-Reply-To: References: <513B5736.1070609@gmail.com> Message-ID: Hi again, Thomas, If you feel comfortable doing so, can you send one of the MP4 files that had a grey thumbnail generated for it to shotwell at yorba.org? (It'll be treated as confidential by us, but if these contain sensitive or private footage you'd rather not share, simply aiming the camera that produces them at an empty wall and shooting a few seconds of that should also work.) If the import was all files generated by the same camera, but only some receive grey thumbnails, are there any other things that might be different about them (such as resolution or file size)? Cheers, -c On 19/03/2013, Thomas Novin wrote: > Hello > > Yes, I still have the problem. Some .mp4-files generates grey > thumbnails. Just now I imported 43 files. About 25% of them where gray > (like mosaic). All good in Nautilus as usual. > > $ dpkg -l | grep gstream | egrep '1.0-plugins-|plugins-bad1' > ii gstreamer1.0-plugins-base:i386 > 1.0.5-1~ubuntu12.10.1~ppa5 > i386 GStreamer plugins from the "base" set > ii gstreamer1.0-plugins-good:i386 > 1.0.5-1ubuntu1~ubuntu12.10.1~ppa4 > i386 GStreamer plugins from the "good" set > ii gstreamer1.0-plugins-ugly:i386 > 1.0.5-1~ubuntu12.10.1~ppa1 > i386 GStreamer plugins from the "ugly" set > ii libgstreamer-plugins-bad1.0-0:i386 > 1.0.5-1ubuntu1~ubuntu12.10.1~ppa3 > i386 GStreamer development files for libraries from the > "bad" set > > If I remove all these imported files and do it again, the same files > will get bad thumbnails also the next time. > > Rgds//Thomas > > > On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Clint Rogers wrote: >> Hi Thomas, >> >> Are you still having problems with this? Please let us know. >> >> Also, just to reconfirm, you have the version of plugins-bad for 1.0 >> installed already, right? >> >> Cheers, >> -c >> >> On 12/03/2013, Thomas Novin wrote: >>> Not very good I guess, I already have "bad thumbnails" so they are not >>> empty. >>> >>> https://xyz.pp.se/~thnov/up/Screenshot%20from%202013-03-12%2017:44:09.png >>> >>> However, I still get gray thumbnails on certain videos when I import >>> new ones, even after the issue was closed. But still all is good in >>> Nautilus. >>> >>> Rgds//Thomas >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Clint Rogers wrote: >>>> Hi Thomas, >>>> >>>> What should happen is that, if you install or update one or more >>>> GStreamer codecs, Shotwell should pick up on this the next time it's >>>> launched, and attempt to thumbnail any video files for which it >>>> doesn't have thumbnails already. There shouldn't be any need to blow >>>> away your other good thumbnails, though. >>>> >>>> Can you try this and let us know if it works? >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> -c >>>> >>>> >>>> On 11/03/2013, Thomas Novin wrote: >>>>> My issue is with video-files so I don't think I can do rotate there. >>>>> >>>>> Any other suggestion? Since I have a 20-30k+ library it seems a bit >>>>> hefty to remove all thumbnails just to re-create 100 :) >>>>> >>>>> Rgds//Thomas >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Joseph Bylund >>>>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> Thomas, >>>>>> I believe rotate-undo works, the original message says it does not >>>>>> work >>>>>> for >>>>>> raw files. >>>>>> http://lists.yorba.org/pipermail/shotwell/2011-November/003309.html >>>>>> -Joe >>>>>> >>>>>> On 03/09/2013 07:48 AM, Thomas Novin wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hello >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Is it possible to re-generate thumbnails for just some file(s)? I >>>>>>> have >>>>>>> some bad thumbnails because of Bug #6452 but I want to re-generate >>>>>>> them when I have the fixed version of Shotwell. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Rgds//Thomas >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Shotwell mailing list >>>>>>> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >>>>>>> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Shotwell mailing list >>>>> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >>>>> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> --------------------------- >>>> "I asked if Sodium, Bromine and Oxygen wanted to hang out, but they >>>> were like 'Na Br O'..." >>> >> >> >> -- >> --------------------------- >> "I asked if Sodium, Bromine and Oxygen wanted to hang out, but they >> were like 'Na Br O'..." > -- --------------------------- "I don't know what (b? - 4ac) equals, and I don't care," Tom said indiscriminately. From rehmann at math.uni-bielefeld.de Tue Mar 19 22:52:20 2013 From: rehmann at math.uni-bielefeld.de (Ulf Rehmann) Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 23:52:20 +0100 Subject: [Shotwell] Call for Translations: Shotwell 0.14! How about bug #4300 ? In-Reply-To: <512d1235.0a19440a.63e7.ffff9d99@mx.google.com> (message from Jim Nelson on Tue, 26 Feb 2013 19:43:14 -0008) Message-ID: <877gl3dmu3.fsf@rhea.lan> Hi Jim, I have installed shotwell 0.14 (on Ubuntu 12.10). It works well so far for me: thanks to everybody who helps developing this great system! However, it seems that bug #4300 is only partially fixed. If shotwell starts with no searchbar activated, then under "Library", the rejected pages are not displayed, as they should. However, if one opens an event collection or a tagged collection containing rejected pages these are displayed, but they should not. Pressing F8 once (or more times) for such an event or tagged collection will make the rejected pages dissappear, but only for that collection for which F8 was pressed. If shotwell is started with searchbar activated (e.g., because it before was closed in that state), all rejected pages are initially not displayed as they should. However, pressing F8 (i.e., toogling off the search bar) puts it into the state described above. It would be nice if this could be fixed: Rejected pages initially should not be shown within any collection, no matter if the search bar is on or off (possibly unless the system is configured otherwise, if such a config option is intended). Any comments? All the best, Ulf ------------------------------------------- Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 19:43:14 -0008 From: Jim Nelson Subject: Re: [Shotwell] Call for Translations: Shotwell 0.14! How about bug #4300 ? To: Ulf Rehmann Cc: Lucas Beeler , shotwell at lists.yorba.org In-Reply-To: <87y5eb2xdh.fsf at rhea.lan> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-m+JhXYiYK1qrbSOVxWnc" [1:text/plain Hide] Hi Ulf, Yes, we're hoping to have that fixed for 0.14. -- Jim On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 2:16 AM, Ulf Rehmann wrote: Hi Lucas, Thanks for the good news concerning 0.14! Here is a question: Will the new release contain a fix of bug #4300? See below. Best regards, Ulf ------------------------- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 01:19:40 -0008 From: Jim Nelson Subject: Re: [Shotwell] Again: Bug #4300 Shotwell view state is incorrect at startup To: Ulf Rehmann Cc: shotwell at lists.yorba.org In-Reply-To: <87fw3s7yjx.fsf at rhea.lan> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-gPSIVqCTMVddXW/af6Tv" [1:text/plain Hide] Hi Ulf, I can reproduce the problem you're seeing. ?I've re-opened the bug for 0.14. -- Jim On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Ulf Rehmann wrote: It seems that bug #4300 is still not fixed (or was revived). Pages rated "Rejected" are initially shown in version 13.0 as well as in 13.1. As far as I can tell, the code to fix this problem as mentioned on http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4300 is (in slightly modified version) contained in my 13.1 sources, but does not seem to work. I am working on Ubuntu 12.10. Can anybody help? Best regards Ulf _______________________________________________ Shotwell mailing list Shotwell at lists.yorba.org http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell [2:text/html Show] _______________________________________________ Shotwell mailing list Shotwell at lists.yorba.org http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell [2:text/html Show] From lucas at yorba.org Tue Mar 19 23:06:12 2013 From: lucas at yorba.org (Lucas Beeler) Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 16:06:12 -0700 Subject: [Shotwell] Shotwell 0.14.0 saving configuration In-Reply-To: <1363720470.15663.9.camel@b2r> References: <1363720470.15663.9.camel@b2r> Message-ID: Hi Chris, We've had reports of a similar problem on other Gentoo systems given the way that Gentoo handles GSettings configuration data. This mailing list thread discusses the problem and a partial solution: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.apps.shotwell/3701. I hope that helps somewhat! Cheers, Lucas On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Chris Gurgiolo wrote: > Hi, > > I just updated to shotwell 0.14.0 on a gentoo system. When I change > view settings to match how I like to see things, the settings don't > appear to be saved. That is when I exit and restart shotwell I am back > to the default settings (no sidebar etc.) How do I get the settings to > be saved? If I know where they are set I can change them manually. > > Also, for what it's worth the slideshow options don't appear to work. > I can get a slideshow but the transition appears to stay at NONE no > matter what I select and there is no title even when I ask for it to be > included. > > Thanks in advance for any help. > > chris > > -- > Chris Gurgiolo > Bitterroot Basic Research Inc. > 837 Westside Road > Hamilton, MT 59840-9369 > > Phone: (406)363-6163 > E-Mail: chris at gurgiolo.com > > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From onefiftyfour at hotmail.com Tue Mar 19 23:16:48 2013 From: onefiftyfour at hotmail.com (eric L) Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 18:16:48 -0500 Subject: [Shotwell] Shotwell 0.14.0 Released In-Reply-To: References: , , Message-ID: I went ahead and installed the gstreamer1 packages from the F18 Repo. I did get Shotwell to compile after also rebuilding gexiv2 (from git) by the way, i don't think the F18 repos have the required version of gexiv2 (libgexiv2) - another possible change for the install page. thanks for the reply and keep up the good work. i really like the folder views. -eric > Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 15:08:19 -0700 > Subject: Re: [Shotwell] Shotwell 0.14.0 Released > From: clinton at yorba.org > To: onefiftyfour at hotmail.com > CC: shotwell at lists.yorba.org > > Hi Eric, > > > From the install page for Fedora - "Shotwell 0.14 will ship as the default > > photo manager on Fedora Core 18." > > > > Is this really true? Fedora 18 was released back in January. > > > > Thank you for calling this to our attention; it was a factual error > and has been corrected. > > > Fedora 18 has these packages available: > > ... > > But these are not in Fedora 17 repos that I can find. Is it safe to > > install these packages from the Fedora 18 repo on my Fedora 17 > > machine? > > This hasn't been tested by us, so I cannot officially recommend it, > although I suspect it might work, especially since GStreamer 0.10 and > 1.0 can safely coexist on the same computer. > > The current recommendation is for FC17 users to upgrade, if possible; > barring that, it's possible to build GStreamer from source; please see > http://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/data/doc/gstreamer/head/faq/html/chapter-getting.html#getting-gstreamer-source > for details. > > We do apologize for the inconvenience caused by the incorrect > instructions that were posted earlier. Thank you again for calling > these to our attention, and if you have any other questions or > comments, please let us know. > > Cheers, > -c > > > > On 19 March 2013 12:35, eric L wrote: From lucas at yorba.org Tue Mar 19 23:20:48 2013 From: lucas at yorba.org (Lucas Beeler) Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 16:20:48 -0700 Subject: [Shotwell] Shotwell 0.14.0 Released In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Colin, Sorry about the broken Precise build. We just fixed it and our PPA should be ready and waiting for you to upgrade Shotwell! Lucas On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 8:17 AM, Colin Law wrote: > On 19 March 2013 13:51, Colin Law wrote: >> On 19 March 2013 10:13, Colin Law wrote: >>> On 19 March 2013 00:16, Clint Rogers wrote: >>>> Dood evening, one and all, >>>> >>>> It's my privelege to announce the release of Shotwell 0.14; the >>>> download, as well as installation instructions are available at >>>> http://yorba.org/shotwell/install.html, and Ubuntu users may get it >>>> from our PPA at https://launchpad.net/~yorba/+archive/ppa. >>>> Among the many enhancements and fixes this release brings are: >>> >>> On 12.04 (32 bit), with the ppa enabled, sudo apt-get update && sudo >>> apt-get dist-upgrade is not giving me shotwell 0.14. > > csola48 has pointed out there were build failures on the build for Precise: > Packages in ?yorba?: > shotwell - 0.14.0-1~precise1 (changes file) lucas-yorba 17 hours > ago Published Precise Gnome There were *build > failures. amd64 i386* > > Colin > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From clinton at yorba.org Tue Mar 19 23:34:04 2013 From: clinton at yorba.org (Clint Rogers) Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 16:34:04 -0700 Subject: [Shotwell] Call for Translations: Shotwell 0.14! How about bug #4300 ? In-Reply-To: <877gl3dmu3.fsf@rhea.lan> References: <512d1235.0a19440a.63e7.ffff9d99@mx.google.com> <877gl3dmu3.fsf@rhea.lan> Message-ID: Hi Ulf, You're absolutely right - we can reproduce this there, I just saw it - and it appears to be a logic problem. The main library view, as well as the event view that contains all the thumbnails is a kind of object in the code known as a CollectionPage; as I recall, the filters for each kind of CollectionPage can be set individually. It looks as if, in this case, not showing 'rejecteds' simply isn't being propagated from the library CollectionPage (having the search/filter bar present also applies the filter, which explains why it behaves the way it does when you press F8). Thank you for alerting us to this; I'll reopen the ticket in question right away, and we'll work on getting this fixed. Thanks again, -c On 19/03/2013, Ulf Rehmann wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > I have installed shotwell 0.14 (on Ubuntu 12.10). It works well so far > for me: thanks to everybody who helps developing this great system! > > However, it seems that bug #4300 is only partially fixed. > > If shotwell starts with no searchbar activated, then under "Library", > the rejected pages are not displayed, as they should. > > However, if one opens an event collection or a tagged collection > containing rejected pages these are displayed, but they should not. > > Pressing F8 once (or more times) for such an event or tagged collection > will make the rejected pages dissappear, but only for that collection for > which F8 was pressed. > > If shotwell is started with searchbar activated (e.g., because it before > was closed in that state), all rejected pages are initially not > displayed as they should. However, pressing F8 (i.e., toogling off the > search bar) puts it into the state described above. > > It would be nice if this could be fixed: Rejected pages initially should > not be shown within any collection, no matter if the search bar is on or > off (possibly unless the system is configured otherwise, if such a > config option is intended). > > Any comments? > > All the best, > Ulf > > > ------------------------------------------- > Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 19:43:14 -0008 > From: Jim Nelson > Subject: Re: [Shotwell] Call for Translations: Shotwell 0.14! How about bug > #4300 ? > To: Ulf Rehmann > Cc: Lucas Beeler , shotwell at lists.yorba.org > In-Reply-To: <87y5eb2xdh.fsf at rhea.lan> > Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-m+JhXYiYK1qrbSOVxWnc" > > > [1:text/plain Hide] > > Hi Ulf, > > Yes, we're hoping to have that fixed for 0.14. > > -- Jim > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 2:16 AM, Ulf Rehmann > wrote: > > Hi Lucas, > > Thanks for the good news concerning 0.14! > > Here is a question: Will the new release contain a fix of bug #4300? > > See below. > > Best regards, > Ulf > > > ------------------------- > > Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 01:19:40 -0008 > From: Jim Nelson > Subject: Re: [Shotwell] Again: Bug #4300 Shotwell view state is incorrect at > > startup > To: Ulf Rehmann > Cc: shotwell at lists.yorba.org > In-Reply-To: <87fw3s7yjx.fsf at rhea.lan> > Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-gPSIVqCTMVddXW/af6Tv" > > > [1:text/plain Hide] > > Hi Ulf, > > I can reproduce the problem you're seeing. ?I've re-opened the bug for 0.14. > > > -- Jim > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Ulf Rehmann wrote: > > It seems that bug #4300 is still not fixed (or was revived). > > Pages rated "Rejected" are initially shown in version 13.0 as well as in > 13.1. > > As far as I can tell, the code to fix this problem as mentioned on > http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4300 is (in slightly modified version) > contained in > my 13.1 sources, but does not seem to work. > > I am working on Ubuntu 12.10. > > Can anybody help? > > Best regards > Ulf > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > > > [2:text/html Show] > > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > > [2:text/html Show] > > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > -- --------------------------- "I don't know what (b? - 4ac) equals, and I don't care," Tom said indiscriminately. From clinton at yorba.org Wed Mar 20 00:19:43 2013 From: clinton at yorba.org (Clint Rogers) Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 17:19:43 -0700 Subject: [Shotwell] Re-create certain thumbnail In-Reply-To: References: <513B5736.1070609@gmail.com> Message-ID: To those following this thread, team lead and fellow Yorban Lucas Beeler just pointed something illuminating out about the grey thumbnails with 'ghostlike' images - what we're actually seeing is an intermediary frame, but without its 'parent' keyframe having been read first. As you probably already know, many common video formats store a keyframe, where all the pixels in the shot are set at once, and then, to reduce the amount of required storage space, they store what's changed between the previous frame and the current one for several frames after that; this is known as an intermediary frame (this is an oversimplification, but sufficient for this discussion). In this case, the thumbnailer has never 'seen' the keyframe, so the pixbuf it's working with is valid, but empty of anything useful (grey). The thumbnailer then applies an intermediary frame's worth of motion changes to that, leading to the ghosting. (If you ever play a low-bit-rate video in certain formats in your favourite player and drag the time slider around arbitrarily, you may see similar graphical corruption.) There is a ticket open to more-correctly use GStreamer 1.0 the way it was designed (http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/6520), and a large part of this is always seeking to a point in a video where there's guaranteed to be a keyframe. This should fix the grey thumbnail issue completely. Cheers, -c On 19/03/2013, Clint Rogers wrote: > Hi again, Thomas, > > If you feel comfortable doing so, can you send one of the MP4 files > that had a grey thumbnail generated for it to shotwell at yorba.org? > (It'll be treated as confidential by us, but if these contain > sensitive or private footage you'd rather not share, simply aiming the > camera that produces them at an empty wall and shooting a few seconds > of that should also work.) > > If the import was all files generated by the same camera, but only > some receive grey thumbnails, are there any other things that might be > different about them (such as resolution or file size)? > > Cheers, > -c > > On 19/03/2013, Thomas Novin wrote: >> Hello >> >> Yes, I still have the problem. Some .mp4-files generates grey >> thumbnails. Just now I imported 43 files. About 25% of them where gray >> (like mosaic). All good in Nautilus as usual. >> >> $ dpkg -l | grep gstream | egrep '1.0-plugins-|plugins-bad1' >> ii gstreamer1.0-plugins-base:i386 >> 1.0.5-1~ubuntu12.10.1~ppa5 >> i386 GStreamer plugins from the "base" set >> ii gstreamer1.0-plugins-good:i386 >> 1.0.5-1ubuntu1~ubuntu12.10.1~ppa4 >> i386 GStreamer plugins from the "good" set >> ii gstreamer1.0-plugins-ugly:i386 >> 1.0.5-1~ubuntu12.10.1~ppa1 >> i386 GStreamer plugins from the "ugly" set >> ii libgstreamer-plugins-bad1.0-0:i386 >> 1.0.5-1ubuntu1~ubuntu12.10.1~ppa3 >> i386 GStreamer development files for libraries from the >> "bad" set >> >> If I remove all these imported files and do it again, the same files >> will get bad thumbnails also the next time. >> >> Rgds//Thomas >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Clint Rogers wrote: >>> Hi Thomas, >>> >>> Are you still having problems with this? Please let us know. >>> >>> Also, just to reconfirm, you have the version of plugins-bad for 1.0 >>> installed already, right? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> -c >>> >>> On 12/03/2013, Thomas Novin wrote: >>>> Not very good I guess, I already have "bad thumbnails" so they are not >>>> empty. >>>> >>>> https://xyz.pp.se/~thnov/up/Screenshot%20from%202013-03-12%2017:44:09.png >>>> >>>> However, I still get gray thumbnails on certain videos when I import >>>> new ones, even after the issue was closed. But still all is good in >>>> Nautilus. >>>> >>>> Rgds//Thomas >>>> >>>> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Clint Rogers >>>> wrote: >>>>> Hi Thomas, >>>>> >>>>> What should happen is that, if you install or update one or more >>>>> GStreamer codecs, Shotwell should pick up on this the next time it's >>>>> launched, and attempt to thumbnail any video files for which it >>>>> doesn't have thumbnails already. There shouldn't be any need to blow >>>>> away your other good thumbnails, though. >>>>> >>>>> Can you try this and let us know if it works? >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> -c >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 11/03/2013, Thomas Novin wrote: >>>>>> My issue is with video-files so I don't think I can do rotate there. >>>>>> >>>>>> Any other suggestion? Since I have a 20-30k+ library it seems a bit >>>>>> hefty to remove all thumbnails just to re-create 100 :) >>>>>> >>>>>> Rgds//Thomas >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Joseph Bylund >>>>>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> Thomas, >>>>>>> I believe rotate-undo works, the original message says it does not >>>>>>> work >>>>>>> for >>>>>>> raw files. >>>>>>> http://lists.yorba.org/pipermail/shotwell/2011-November/003309.html >>>>>>> -Joe >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 03/09/2013 07:48 AM, Thomas Novin wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hello >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Is it possible to re-generate thumbnails for just some file(s)? I >>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>> some bad thumbnails because of Bug #6452 but I want to re-generate >>>>>>>> them when I have the fixed version of Shotwell. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Rgds//Thomas >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Shotwell mailing list >>>>>>>> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >>>>>>>> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Shotwell mailing list >>>>>> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >>>>>> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> --------------------------- >>>>> "I asked if Sodium, Bromine and Oxygen wanted to hang out, but they >>>>> were like 'Na Br O'..." >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> --------------------------- >>> "I asked if Sodium, Bromine and Oxygen wanted to hang out, but they >>> were like 'Na Br O'..." >> > > > -- > --------------------------- > "I don't know what (b? - 4ac) equals, and I don't care," Tom said > indiscriminately. > -- --------------------------- "I don't know what (b? - 4ac) equals, and I don't care," Tom said indiscriminately. From clanlaw at googlemail.com Wed Mar 20 09:34:02 2013 From: clanlaw at googlemail.com (Colin Law) Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 09:34:02 +0000 Subject: [Shotwell] Shotwell 0.14.0 Released In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On 19 March 2013 23:20, Lucas Beeler wrote: > Hi Colin, > > Sorry about the broken Precise build. We just fixed it and our PPA > should be ready and waiting for you to upgrade Shotwell! Many thanks, all working now. I did have to add the gstreamer developers ppa (ppa:gstreamer-developers/ppa) in order to get gstreamer 1.0 for Precise. Was that the right thing to do? Colin > > Lucas > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 8:17 AM, Colin Law wrote: >> On 19 March 2013 13:51, Colin Law wrote: >>> On 19 March 2013 10:13, Colin Law wrote: >>>> On 19 March 2013 00:16, Clint Rogers wrote: >>>>> Dood evening, one and all, >>>>> >>>>> It's my privelege to announce the release of Shotwell 0.14; the >>>>> download, as well as installation instructions are available at >>>>> http://yorba.org/shotwell/install.html, and Ubuntu users may get it >>>>> from our PPA at https://launchpad.net/~yorba/+archive/ppa. >>>>> Among the many enhancements and fixes this release brings are: >>>> >>>> On 12.04 (32 bit), with the ppa enabled, sudo apt-get update && sudo >>>> apt-get dist-upgrade is not giving me shotwell 0.14. >> >> csola48 has pointed out there were build failures on the build for Precise: >> Packages in ?yorba?: >> shotwell - 0.14.0-1~precise1 (changes file) lucas-yorba 17 hours >> ago Published Precise Gnome There were *build >> failures. amd64 i386* >> >> Colin >> _______________________________________________ >> Shotwell mailing list >> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From thomas at xyz.pp.se Wed Mar 20 11:06:06 2013 From: thomas at xyz.pp.se (Thomas Novin) Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 12:06:06 +0100 Subject: [Shotwell] Update of libgexiv2-1 broke Shotwell Message-ID: Hello Just got an update of libgexiv2-1. After this Shotwell won't start. /usr/bin/shotwell: error while loading shared libraries: libgexiv2.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory $ ldd /usr/bin/shotwell | grep exiv libgexiv2.so.1 => not found $ apt-cache policy libgexiv2-1 libgexiv2-1: Installed: 0.6.1-0quantal1 Candidate: 0.6.1-0quantal1 Version table: *** 0.6.1-0quantal1 0 500 http://ppa.launchpad.net/yorba/ppa/ubuntu/ quantal/main i386 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 0.4.90-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://se.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ quantal/main i386 Packages $ apt-cache policy shotwell shotwell: Installed: 0.14.0-1~quantal3 Candidate: 0.14.0-1~quantal3 Version table: *** 0.14.0-1~quantal3 0 500 http://ppa.launchpad.net/yorba/ppa/ubuntu/ quantal/main i386 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 0.13.1-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://se.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ quantal-updates/main i386 Packages 0.13.0-0ubuntu3 0 500 http://se.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ quantal/main i386 Packages What's up with that? Did this as a temporary fix: $ find /usr -name "libgexiv2*.*" /usr/lib/libgexiv2.so.2 /usr/lib/libgexiv2.so.2.0.0 $ cd /usr/lib $ sudo ln -s libgexiv2.so.2 libgexiv2.so.1 Now shotwell works again. Rgds//Thomas From gpopac at gmail.com Wed Mar 20 11:23:44 2013 From: gpopac at gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9C=D0=B8=D0=BB=D0=BE=D1=88_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=9F=D0=BE=D0=BF=D0=BE=D0=B2=D0=B8=D1=9B?=) Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 12:23:44 +0100 Subject: [Shotwell] Call for Testing: Shotwell 0.14 In-Reply-To: <5144D56C.3090400@gmail.com> References: <1363176440.2747.5.camel@medjed> <1363306706.6475.18.camel@medjed> <5144D56C.3090400@gmail.com> Message-ID: <1363778624.13117.2.camel@medjed> ? ???, 16. 03 2013. ? 21:26 +0100, Moe Blue ????: > 4. removed *_shotwell and *_embedded files from the DCIM folder on my > camera. (now only the original .ARW and the _ARW.jpg are left). You can use some shell command to rename all of files in your directory. Try this for example: for file in *.ARW.jpg; do mv ${file} ${file%.ARW.jpg}.jpg; done From mail at csordaslaszlo.hu Wed Mar 20 12:34:29 2013 From: mail at csordaslaszlo.hu (csola) Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 13:34:29 +0100 Subject: [Shotwell] Update of libgexiv2-1 broke Shotwell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5149ACD5.7010702@csordaslaszlo.hu> Deat Shotwell.... Ubuntu 12.04.02 LTS: cannot be installed Shotwell 0.14... Error: The next dependence cannot be satisfied: libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-0 (>= 1.0.0) Why?... :( csola From borkenkaefer at abelo.ch Wed Mar 20 12:35:41 2013 From: borkenkaefer at abelo.ch (Borkenkaefer) Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 13:35:41 +0100 Subject: [Shotwell] Shotwell 0.14.0 saving configuration In-Reply-To: References: <1363720470.15663.9.camel@b2r> Message-ID: <20130320133541.353c7821.borkenkaefer@abelo.ch> > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.apps.shotwell/3701. > > I hope that helps somewhat! > I have the same problem on a gentoo system, but deleting the gconf-files didn't help. In my .cache/shotwell/shotwell.log I have L 6035 2013-03-20 06:10:55 [CRT] ConfigurationInterfaces.vala:359: configuration engine 'GSettings' reports ENGINE_ERROR: schema 'org.yorba.shotwell.preferences.ui' is not installed Any suggestions how to fix this? Thanks. b. From clanlaw at googlemail.com Wed Mar 20 13:42:35 2013 From: clanlaw at googlemail.com (Colin Law) Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 13:42:35 +0000 Subject: [Shotwell] Installing 0.14 on Ubuntu 12.04 (was Update of libgexiv2-1 broke Shotwell) Message-ID: On 20 March 2013 12:34, csola wrote: > > Deat Shotwell.... > > Ubuntu 12.04.02 LTS: cannot be installed Shotwell 0.14... > > Error: The next dependence cannot be satisfied: > libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-0 (>= 1.0.0) As I noted in another thread I got over that problem by adding the gstreamer developers ppa (ppa:gstreamer-developers/ppa). Colin From mail at csordaslaszlo.hu Wed Mar 20 14:17:51 2013 From: mail at csordaslaszlo.hu (csola) Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:17:51 +0100 Subject: [Shotwell] Installing 0.14 on Ubuntu 12.04 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5149C50F.6070901@csordaslaszlo.hu> 2013-03-20 14:42 keltez?ssel, Colin Law ?rta: > As I noted in another thread I got over that problem by adding the > gstreamer developers ppa (ppa:gstreamer-developers/ppa). > Sorry... Thx. csola From chris at gurgiolo.com Wed Mar 20 16:19:22 2013 From: chris at gurgiolo.com (Chris Gurgiolo) Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 09:19:22 -0700 Subject: [Shotwell] Shotwell 0.14.0 saving configuration In-Reply-To: <20130320133541.353c7821.borkenkaefer@abelo.ch> References: <1363720470.15663.9.camel@b2r> <20130320133541.353c7821.borkenkaefer@abelo.ch> Message-ID: <1363796362.5371.3.camel@b2r> Had the same problem. The solution is 1. Edit the ebuild - its in /usr/portage/media-gfx/shotwell. 2. Delete the two lines --disable-schemas-compile --disable-icon-update under pkg_setup() section 3. Put the ebuild back into the manifest ebuild shotwell-0.14.0.ebuild manifest 4. emerge shotwell That should solve the problem. chris On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 13:35 +0100, Borkenkaefer wrote: > > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.apps.shotwell/3701. > > > > I hope that helps somewhat! > > > I have the same problem on a gentoo system, but deleting the > gconf-files didn't help. > > In my .cache/shotwell/shotwell.log I have > > L 6035 2013-03-20 06:10:55 [CRT] ConfigurationInterfaces.vala:359: > configuration engine 'GSettings' reports ENGINE_ERROR: schema > 'org.yorba.shotwell.preferences.ui' is not installed > > Any suggestions how to fix this? Thanks. > > b. > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell -- Chris Gurgiolo Bitterroot Basic Research Inc. 837 Westside Road Hamilton, MT 59840-9369 Phone: (406)363-6163 E-Mail: chris at gurgiolo.com From clanlaw at googlemail.com Wed Mar 20 15:40:58 2013 From: clanlaw at googlemail.com (Colin Law) Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:40:58 +0000 Subject: [Shotwell] Installing 0.14 on Ubuntu 12.04 In-Reply-To: <5149D2FD.3070101@csordaslaszlo.hu> References: <5149D2FD.3070101@csordaslaszlo.hu> Message-ID: On 20 March 2013 15:17, csola wrote: > >> As I noted in another thread I got over that problem by adding the >> gstreamer developers ppa (ppa:gstreamer-developers/ppa). >> > > Sorry 2... :) > > Is it necessary to install the content(Precise)of the full container ? Sorry I don't understand the question. I just did sudo apt-add-repository ppa:yorba/ppa sudo apt-add-repository ppa:gstreamer-developers/ppa sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get dist-upgrade All done. Colin PS don't forget to reply to the list. From onefiftyfour at hotmail.com Wed Mar 20 18:19:15 2013 From: onefiftyfour at hotmail.com (eric L) Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 13:19:15 -0500 Subject: [Shotwell] gstreamer1-libav needed for my video thumbnails Message-ID: Maybe this should be listed somewhere in the installation instructions or wiki. Before I installed gstreamer1-libav, upon starting shotwell I got a long running "Updating Database" message. This happened every time I started and nothing seemed to change. After I installed gstreamer1-libav, my video thumbnails were recreated. After I let that finish and restarted shotwell, shotwell is way more responsive at startup. btw, for Fedora 18, gstreamer1-libav is in the rpmfusion repo. From clinton at yorba.org Wed Mar 20 18:28:28 2013 From: clinton at yorba.org (Clint Rogers) Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 11:28:28 -0700 Subject: [Shotwell] gstreamer1-libav needed for my video thumbnails In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi again, Eric, I'll talk to the team lead about how to proceed on this, but you're right, a blurb about recommended GStreamer components in general might be helpful - the 'free' versions of plugins-bad and plugins-ugly Fedora has by default don't seem to want to thumbnail or play anything more exotic than Motion JPEG. Thanks again for the feedback, -c On 20/03/2013, eric L wrote: > Maybe this should be listed somewhere in the installation instructions or > wiki. > > Before I installed gstreamer1-libav, upon starting shotwell I got a long > running "Updating Database" message. This happened every time I started and > nothing seemed to change. > > After I installed gstreamer1-libav, my video thumbnails were recreated. > After I let that finish and restarted shotwell, shotwell is way more > responsive at startup. > > btw, for Fedora 18, gstreamer1-libav is in the rpmfusion repo. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > -- --------------------------- "I don't know what (b? - 4ac) equals, and I don't care," Tom said indiscriminately. From lucas at yorba.org Wed Mar 20 18:49:06 2013 From: lucas at yorba.org (Lucas Beeler) Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 11:49:06 -0700 Subject: [Shotwell] gstreamer1-libav needed for my video thumbnails In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I agree that we should mention this on the requirements page. I've opened a ticket for that task here: http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/6624 Take care, Lucas On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Clint Rogers wrote: > Hi again, Eric, > > I'll talk to the team lead about how to proceed on this, but you're > right, a blurb about recommended GStreamer components in general might > be helpful - the 'free' versions of plugins-bad and plugins-ugly > Fedora has by default don't seem to want to thumbnail or play anything > more exotic than Motion JPEG. > > Thanks again for the feedback, > -c > > On 20/03/2013, eric L wrote: >> Maybe this should be listed somewhere in the installation instructions or >> wiki. >> >> Before I installed gstreamer1-libav, upon starting shotwell I got a long >> running "Updating Database" message. This happened every time I started and >> nothing seemed to change. >> >> After I installed gstreamer1-libav, my video thumbnails were recreated. >> After I let that finish and restarted shotwell, shotwell is way more >> responsive at startup. >> >> btw, for Fedora 18, gstreamer1-libav is in the rpmfusion repo. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Shotwell mailing list >> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell >> > > > -- > --------------------------- > "I don't know what (b? - 4ac) equals, and I don't care," Tom said > indiscriminately. > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From lucas at yorba.org Wed Mar 20 18:54:49 2013 From: lucas at yorba.org (Lucas Beeler) Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 11:54:49 -0700 Subject: [Shotwell] Shotwell 0.14.0 Released In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: > I did have to add the gstreamer > developers ppa (ppa:gstreamer- > developers/ppa) in order to get > gstreamer 1.0 for Precise. Was > that the right thing to do? That was indeed the right thing to do! I'm calling it out here so that other users take note. Thanks for mentioning this! Lucas On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 2:34 AM, Colin Law wrote: > On 19 March 2013 23:20, Lucas Beeler wrote: >> Hi Colin, >> >> Sorry about the broken Precise build. We just fixed it and our PPA >> should be ready and waiting for you to upgrade Shotwell! > > Many thanks, all working now. I did have to add the gstreamer > developers ppa (ppa:gstreamer-developers/ppa) in order to get > gstreamer 1.0 for Precise. Was that the right thing to do? > > Colin > >> >> Lucas >> >> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 8:17 AM, Colin Law wrote: >>> On 19 March 2013 13:51, Colin Law wrote: >>>> On 19 March 2013 10:13, Colin Law wrote: >>>>> On 19 March 2013 00:16, Clint Rogers wrote: >>>>>> Dood evening, one and all, >>>>>> >>>>>> It's my privelege to announce the release of Shotwell 0.14; the >>>>>> download, as well as installation instructions are available at >>>>>> http://yorba.org/shotwell/install.html, and Ubuntu users may get it >>>>>> from our PPA at https://launchpad.net/~yorba/+archive/ppa. >>>>>> Among the many enhancements and fixes this release brings are: >>>>> >>>>> On 12.04 (32 bit), with the ppa enabled, sudo apt-get update && sudo >>>>> apt-get dist-upgrade is not giving me shotwell 0.14. >>> >>> csola48 has pointed out there were build failures on the build for Precise: >>> Packages in ?yorba?: >>> shotwell - 0.14.0-1~precise1 (changes file) lucas-yorba 17 hours >>> ago Published Precise Gnome There were *build >>> failures. amd64 i386* >>> >>> Colin >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Shotwell mailing list >>> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >>> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From lucas at yorba.org Wed Mar 20 21:55:32 2013 From: lucas at yorba.org (Lucas Beeler) Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 14:55:32 -0700 Subject: [Shotwell] Update of libgexiv2-1 broke Shotwell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Thomas, > just got an update of libgexiv2-1. > After this Shotwell won't start. We had to push a new Shotwell build to our Launchpad PPA. As of 20 March 2013 at 3:00pm PDT, this problem is fixed. Lucas On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 4:06 AM, Thomas Novin wrote: > Hello > > Just got an update of libgexiv2-1. After this Shotwell won't start. > > /usr/bin/shotwell: error while loading shared libraries: > libgexiv2.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or > directory > > $ ldd /usr/bin/shotwell | grep exiv > libgexiv2.so.1 => not found > > $ apt-cache policy libgexiv2-1 > libgexiv2-1: > Installed: 0.6.1-0quantal1 > Candidate: 0.6.1-0quantal1 > Version table: > *** 0.6.1-0quantal1 0 > 500 http://ppa.launchpad.net/yorba/ppa/ubuntu/ quantal/main > i386 Packages > 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > 0.4.90-0ubuntu1 0 > 500 http://se.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ quantal/main i386 Packages > > $ apt-cache policy shotwell > shotwell: > Installed: 0.14.0-1~quantal3 > Candidate: 0.14.0-1~quantal3 > Version table: > *** 0.14.0-1~quantal3 0 > 500 http://ppa.launchpad.net/yorba/ppa/ubuntu/ quantal/main > i386 Packages > 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > 0.13.1-0ubuntu1 0 > 500 http://se.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ quantal-updates/main > i386 Packages > 0.13.0-0ubuntu3 0 > 500 http://se.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ quantal/main i386 Packages > > What's up with that? Did this as a temporary fix: > > $ find /usr -name "libgexiv2*.*" > /usr/lib/libgexiv2.so.2 > /usr/lib/libgexiv2.so.2.0.0 > $ cd /usr/lib > $ sudo ln -s libgexiv2.so.2 libgexiv2.so.1 > > Now shotwell works again. > > Rgds//Thomas > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From lucas at yorba.org Wed Mar 20 21:57:13 2013 From: lucas at yorba.org (Lucas Beeler) Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 14:57:13 -0700 Subject: [Shotwell] Update of libgexiv2-1 broke Shotwell In-Reply-To: <5149ACD5.7010702@csordaslaszlo.hu> References: <5149ACD5.7010702@csordaslaszlo.hu> Message-ID: Hi csola, > Error: The next dependence cannot be > satisfied: > libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-0 (>= 1.0.0) > > Why?... :( You need to add the GStreamer developers PPA to your system to get an updated version of GStreamer. The PPA URL is https://launchpad.net/~gstreamer-developers/+archive/ppa. Lucas On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 5:34 AM, csola wrote: > > Deat Shotwell.... > > Ubuntu 12.04.02 LTS: cannot be installed Shotwell 0.14... > > Error: The next dependence cannot be satisfied: > libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-0 (>= 1.0.0) > > Why?... :( > > csola > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From xavierviader at gmail.com Wed Mar 20 22:32:18 2013 From: xavierviader at gmail.com (xavi) Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 23:32:18 +0100 Subject: [Shotwell] Sotwell 0.14 in Precise In-Reply-To: References: <5149ACD5.7010702@csordaslaszlo.hu> Message-ID: <514A38F2.6090704@gmail.com> Hi, thanks yorba for your job. I've tested 0.14 in precise 12.0.4 amb almost everything it's ok. I still found wrong event dates like described in http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/3943. I've tested in Spanish and in Catalan and with both I got the same use. In English everything was ok. Xavi On 20/03/13 22:57, Lucas Beeler wrote: > Hi csola, > >> Error: The next dependence cannot be >> satisfied: >> libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-0 (>= 1.0.0) >> >> Why?... :( > You need to add the GStreamer developers PPA to your system to get an > updated version of GStreamer. The PPA URL is > https://launchpad.net/~gstreamer-developers/+archive/ppa. > > Lucas > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 5:34 AM, csola wrote: >> Deat Shotwell.... >> >> Ubuntu 12.04.02 LTS: cannot be installed Shotwell 0.14... >> >> Error: The next dependence cannot be satisfied: >> libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-0 (>= 1.0.0) >> >> Why?... :( >> >> csola >> _______________________________________________ >> Shotwell mailing list >> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From hernan.lopez+ubuntu at gmail.com Wed Mar 20 23:44:09 2013 From: hernan.lopez+ubuntu at gmail.com (Hernan Javier Lopez) Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 20:44:09 -0300 Subject: [Shotwell] Update of libgexiv2-1 broke Shotwell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: 2013/3/20 Lucas Beeler > Hi Thomas, > > > just got an update of libgexiv2-1. > > After this Shotwell won't start. > > We had to push a new Shotwell build to our Launchpad PPA. As of 20 > March 2013 at 3:00pm PDT, this problem is fixed. > > Lucas > > Thanks! From lucas at yorba.org Thu Mar 21 00:52:19 2013 From: lucas at yorba.org (Lucas Beeler) Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 17:52:19 -0700 Subject: [Shotwell] Sotwell 0.14 in Precise In-Reply-To: <514A38F2.6090704@gmail.com> References: <5149ACD5.7010702@csordaslaszlo.hu> <514A38F2.6090704@gmail.com> Message-ID: Hi Xavi, We just fixed this. The problem was subtle and involved a bogus strftime format specifier. Feel free to pull from master and build from source if you want to get the fix right away. Lucas On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 3:32 PM, xavi wrote: > Hi, > thanks yorba for your job. > > I've tested 0.14 in precise 12.0.4 amb almost everything it's ok. I still > found wrong event dates like described in > http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/3943. > > I've tested in Spanish and in Catalan and with both I got the same use. In > English everything was ok. > > Xavi > > On 20/03/13 22:57, Lucas Beeler wrote: >> >> Hi csola, >> >>> Error: The next dependence cannot be >>> satisfied: >>> libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-0 (>= 1.0.0) >>> >>> Why?... :( >> >> You need to add the GStreamer developers PPA to your system to get an >> updated version of GStreamer. The PPA URL is >> https://launchpad.net/~gstreamer-developers/+archive/ppa. >> >> Lucas >> >> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 5:34 AM, csola wrote: >>> >>> Deat Shotwell.... >>> >>> Ubuntu 12.04.02 LTS: cannot be installed Shotwell 0.14... >>> >>> Error: The next dependence cannot be satisfied: >>> libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-0 (>= 1.0.0) >>> >>> Why?... :( >>> >>> csola >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Shotwell mailing list >>> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >>> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Shotwell mailing list >> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > > > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From dmitry.kann at gmail.com Thu Mar 21 07:27:19 2013 From: dmitry.kann at gmail.com (Dmitry Kann) Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 08:27:19 +0100 Subject: [Shotwell] Regression on Shotwell 0.14 Message-ID: Hi all, After I upgraded Shotwell to 0.14 this bug seems to be reintroduced: http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/5965 shotwell: error while loading shared libraries: libgexiv2.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory What's worse, after downgrade to 0.13.1 (from quantal-updates) it fails to start with the same error. How can I fix that? Kind regards, Dmitry From lucas at yorba.org Thu Mar 21 16:50:27 2013 From: lucas at yorba.org (Lucas Beeler) Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 09:50:27 -0700 Subject: [Shotwell] Regression on Shotwell 0.14 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Dmitry, This is a known issue. You should be able to fix this by completely removing Shotwell and re-installing the 0.14.0 package from the Yorba PPA. This was due to a mistake on our end: we published the Shotwell and GExiv2 packages to our PPA in the wrong order and did not fix the problem until yesterday evening, U.S. Pacific Time. The problem should be fixed now. The associated bug ticket for the issue is http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/6618. Take care, Lucas On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:27 AM, Dmitry Kann wrote: > Hi all, > > After I upgraded Shotwell to 0.14 this bug seems to be reintroduced: > http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/5965 > > shotwell: error while loading shared libraries: libgexiv2.so.1: cannot open > shared object file: No such file or directory > > What's worse, after downgrade to 0.13.1 (from quantal-updates) it fails to > start with the same error. > > How can I fix that? > > > Kind regards, > Dmitry > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From schuetz.marc at gmx.de Thu Mar 21 18:58:42 2013 From: schuetz.marc at gmx.de (Marc) Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 19:58:42 +0100 Subject: [Shotwell] Shotwell 0.14 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <514B5862.1030706@gmx.de> Hi all, 0.14 is a great release. Thanks all for this great step. Thanks everybody, all coders, all testers, all users :-) Looking forward to next bugfixes and featurereleases kind regards Marc -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 555 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From arzitek at yahoo.com Thu Mar 21 20:53:54 2013 From: arzitek at yahoo.com (Luc More) Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 13:53:54 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Shotwell] Call for Testing: Shotwell 0.14 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1363899234.45317.YahooMailNeo@web122306.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Hi there, How do I build it (from source) on Ubuntu ? ?I installed the gstreamer-1.0 from PPA stuff after apt-add-repository ppa:gstreamer-developers/ppa as recommended in another message on this list. ?But this gets me only the executables I guess. ?"make" says it won't find gstreamer-1.0. ?Is this a FAQ? I'd like to build from source because I patch it (I don't want Shotwell to touch my?Iptc.Application2.Caption tag, even though I want other info to be written to the image files). Luc ________________________________ De?: Lucas Beeler ??: shotwell Envoy? le : Mercredi 13 mars 2013 2h24 Objet?: [Shotwell] Call for Testing: Shotwell 0.14 Hi Shotwell Fans, Shotwell 0.14.0 is soon to be released! This upcoming version of Shotwell packs a ton of new features, including: * A folder tree in the sidebar provides a directory-hierarchy view of your Shotwell library * Dramatically improved user experience for RAW photographers?long-standing bugs involving RAW developer switching have been fixed * Comprehensive logging of photo and video import, including the ability to save an import log file to disk. The log tracks which files were detected as duplicates as well as files that couldn't be imported due to disk or camera problems. * The Facebook Connector now uses the Facebook Graph API, resulting in a smoother, more stable experience uploading photos and videos to Facebook. As a bonus, Shotwell photo titles now appear as Facebook photo captions! * The Shotwell video subsystem now relies on GStreamer 1.0, making for easier, more stable video import, better video thumbnails, and better handling of video metadata * New slideshow effects, improved Piwigo support, the ability to show and hide the main Shotwell sidebar, and more... You can help us make Shotwell 0.14.0 the most stable Shotwell ever by downloading the current development snapshot and testing it. To get and test the latest code, you'll need to either pull from Shotwell git master and build from source or, if you're on Ubuntu, install a Shotwell daily build from the Yorba daily builds PPA. Pulling from Shotwell git master should be as easy as executing $ git clone git://yorba.org/shotwell on your system, and then building as usual with $ ./configure $ make # make install For Ubuntu users, the Shotwell daily builds PPA is located here: https://launchpad.net/~yorba/+archive/daily-builds As always, we suggest backing up your Shotwell database before testing pre-release code. You can learn how to do this by reading the "How can I back up my Shotwell library?" section of the Shotwell FAQ here: http://redmine.yorba.org/projects/shotwell/wiki/ShotwellFAQ Cheers, Lucas ----------------------- Lucas Beeler Shotwell Technical Lead Yorba Foundation San Francisco, California _______________________________________________ Shotwell mailing list Shotwell at lists.yorba.org http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From clinton at yorba.org Thu Mar 21 21:18:23 2013 From: clinton at yorba.org (Clint Rogers) Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 14:18:23 -0700 Subject: [Shotwell] Call for Testing: Shotwell 0.14 In-Reply-To: <1363899234.45317.YahooMailNeo@web122306.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> References: <1363899234.45317.YahooMailNeo@web122306.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Hi Luc, Did you also install the '-dev' packages (namely libgstreamer1.0-dev)? Cheers, -c On 21/03/2013, Luc More wrote: > Hi there, > > How do I build it (from source) on Ubuntu ? ?I installed the gstreamer-1.0 > from PPA stuff after apt-add-repository ppa:gstreamer-developers/ppa as > recommended in another message on this list. ?But this gets me only the > executables I guess. ?"make" says it won't find gstreamer-1.0. ?Is this a > FAQ? > I'd like to build from source because I patch it (I don't want Shotwell to > touch my?Iptc.Application2.Caption tag, even though I want other info to be > written to the image files). > > Luc > > > ________________________________ > De?: Lucas Beeler > ??: shotwell > Envoy? le : Mercredi 13 mars 2013 2h24 > Objet?: [Shotwell] Call for Testing: Shotwell 0.14 > > Hi Shotwell Fans, > > Shotwell 0.14.0 is soon to be released! This upcoming version of > Shotwell packs a ton of new features, including: > > * A folder tree in the sidebar provides a directory-hierarchy view of > your Shotwell library > > * Dramatically improved user experience for RAW > photographers?long-standing bugs involving RAW developer switching > have been fixed > > * Comprehensive logging of photo and video import, including the > ability to save an import log file to disk. The log tracks which files > were detected as duplicates as well as files that couldn't be imported > due to disk or camera problems. > > * The Facebook Connector now uses the Facebook Graph API, resulting in > a smoother, more stable experience uploading photos and videos to > Facebook. As a bonus, Shotwell photo titles now appear as Facebook > photo captions! > > * The Shotwell video subsystem now relies on GStreamer 1.0, making for > easier, more stable video import, better video thumbnails, and better > handling of video metadata > > * New slideshow effects, improved Piwigo support, the ability to show > and hide the main Shotwell sidebar, and more... > > You can help us make Shotwell 0.14.0 the most stable Shotwell ever by > downloading the current development snapshot and testing it. To get > and test the latest code, you'll need to either pull from Shotwell git > master and build from source or, if you're on Ubuntu, install a > Shotwell daily build from the Yorba daily builds PPA. > > Pulling from Shotwell git master should be as easy as executing > > $ git clone git://yorba.org/shotwell > > on your system, and then building as usual with > > $ ./configure > $ make > # make install > > For Ubuntu users, the Shotwell daily builds PPA is located here: > https://launchpad.net/~yorba/+archive/daily-builds > > As always, we suggest backing up your Shotwell database before testing > pre-release code. You can learn how to do this by reading the "How can > I back up my Shotwell library?" section of the Shotwell FAQ here: > http://redmine.yorba.org/projects/shotwell/wiki/ShotwellFAQ > > Cheers, > Lucas > > ----------------------- > Lucas Beeler > Shotwell Technical Lead > Yorba Foundation > San Francisco, California > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > -- --------------------------- "I don't know what (b? - 4ac) equals, and I don't care," Tom said indiscriminately. From arzitek at yahoo.com Thu Mar 21 21:56:58 2013 From: arzitek at yahoo.com (Luc More) Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 14:56:58 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Shotwell] Call for Testing: Shotwell 0.14 References: <1363899234.45317.YahooMailNeo@web122306.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1363903018.56740.YahooMailNeo@web122304.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Hi Clint, thanks for your quick response. Well the message I had found gave the names of the binary packages, but apparently not all of these exist in the PPA under *-dev names. ?I had not found any after randomly appending "-dev" to some of them. ?Now I've installed the one you referred below but I get other errors and I'm clueless about what the name of the corresponding package can be... I already had similar difficulty when I built 0.13 the previous time but thanks to some ?searches and probably some help from this list I was able to add all the necessary libs (and their sources). ? I'm not a frequent developer at all under Ubuntu and have no idea about how to look up this kind of info into PPAs and stuff :-| In an ideal world it would be really easier if I could find the list of packages somehow... ?However google helped me find the names of what I needed to install so now its built. ?I'll backup, install and test when ready. For reference, I needed also to install one additional .deb after the one you mentioned. sudo apt-get install libgstreamer1.0-dev ?libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-dev ./configure make Thanks ! Luc ________________________________ De?: Clint Rogers ??: Luc More Cc?: Lucas Beeler ; shotwell Envoy? le : Jeudi 21 mars 2013 22h18 Objet?: Re: [Shotwell] Call for Testing: Shotwell 0.14 Hi Luc, Did you also install the '-dev' packages (namely libgstreamer1.0-dev)? Cheers, -c On 21/03/2013, Luc More wrote: > Hi there, > > How do I build it (from source) on Ubuntu ? ?I installed the gstreamer-1.0 > from PPA stuff after apt-add-repository ppa:gstreamer-developers/ppa as > recommended in another message on this list. ?But this gets me only the > executables I guess. ?"make" says it won't find gstreamer-1.0. ?Is this a > FAQ? > I'd like to build from source because I patch it (I don't want Shotwell to > touch my?Iptc.Application2.Caption tag, even though I want other info to be > written to the image files). > > Luc > > > ________________________________ >? De?: Lucas Beeler > ??: shotwell > Envoy? le : Mercredi 13 mars 2013 2h24 > Objet?: [Shotwell] Call for Testing: Shotwell 0.14 > > Hi Shotwell Fans, > > Shotwell 0.14.0 is soon to be released! This upcoming version of > Shotwell packs a ton of new features, including: > > * A folder tree in the sidebar provides a directory-hierarchy view of > your Shotwell library > > * Dramatically improved user experience for RAW > photographers?long-standing bugs involving RAW developer switching > have been fixed > > * Comprehensive logging of photo and video import, including the > ability to save an import log file to disk. The log tracks which files > were detected as duplicates as well as files that couldn't be imported > due to disk or camera problems. > > * The Facebook Connector now uses the Facebook Graph API, resulting in > a smoother, more stable experience uploading photos and videos to > Facebook. As a bonus, Shotwell photo titles now appear as Facebook > photo captions! > > * The Shotwell video subsystem now relies on GStreamer 1.0, making for > easier, more stable video import, better video thumbnails, and better > handling of video metadata > > * New slideshow effects, improved Piwigo support, the ability to show > and hide the main Shotwell sidebar, and more... > > You can help us make Shotwell 0.14.0 the most stable Shotwell ever by > downloading the current development snapshot and testing it. To get > and test the latest code, you'll need to either pull from Shotwell git > master and build from source or, if you're on Ubuntu, install a > Shotwell daily build from the Yorba daily builds PPA. > > Pulling from Shotwell git master should be as easy as executing > > $ git clone git://yorba.org/shotwell > > on your system, and then building as usual with > > $ ./configure > $ make > # make install > > For Ubuntu users, the Shotwell daily builds PPA is located here: > https://launchpad.net/~yorba/+archive/daily-builds > > As always, we suggest backing up your Shotwell database before testing > pre-release code. You can learn how to do this by reading the "How can > I back up my Shotwell library?" section of the Shotwell FAQ here: > http://redmine.yorba.org/projects/shotwell/wiki/ShotwellFAQ > > Cheers, > Lucas > > ----------------------- > Lucas Beeler > Shotwell Technical Lead > Yorba Foundation > San Francisco, California > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > -- --------------------------- "I don't know what (b? - 4ac) equals, and I don't care," Tom said indiscriminately. From arzitek at yahoo.com Thu Mar 21 22:25:24 2013 From: arzitek at yahoo.com (Luc More) Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 15:25:24 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Shotwell] Call for Testing: Shotwell 0.14 In-Reply-To: <1363903018.56740.YahooMailNeo@web122304.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> References: <1363899234.45317.YahooMailNeo@web122306.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <1363903018.56740.YahooMailNeo@web122304.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1363904724.87508.YahooMailNeo@web122302.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Build was fine. ?Startup OK. ?0.14 even found and auto-imported 3 corrupted JPEGs that the older version had left there without managing to import them. ?Now I'm going to test. Thanks for this great app ! Luc ________________________________ De?: Luc More ??: Clint Rogers Cc?: shotwell Envoy? le : Jeudi 21 mars 2013 22h56 Objet?: Re: [Shotwell] Call for Testing: Shotwell 0.14 Hi Clint, thanks for your quick response. Well the message I had found gave the names of the binary packages, but apparently not all of these exist in the PPA under *-dev names. ?I had not found any after randomly appending "-dev" to some of them. ?Now I've installed the one you referred below but I get other errors and I'm clueless about what the name of the corresponding package can be... I already had similar difficulty when I built 0.13 the previous time but thanks to some ?searches and probably some help from this list I was able to add all the necessary libs (and their sources). ? I'm not a frequent developer at all under Ubuntu and have no idea about how to look up this kind of info into PPAs and stuff :-| In an ideal world it would be really easier if I could find the list of packages somehow... ?However google helped me find the names of what I needed to install so now its built. ?I'll backup, install and test when ready. For reference, I needed also to install one additional .deb after the one you mentioned. sudo apt-get install libgstreamer1.0-dev ?libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-dev ./configure make Thanks ! Luc ________________________________ De?: Clint Rogers ??: Luc More Cc?: Lucas Beeler ; shotwell Envoy? le : Jeudi 21 mars 2013 22h18 Objet?: Re: [Shotwell] Call for Testing: Shotwell 0.14 Hi Luc, Did you also install the '-dev' packages (namely libgstreamer1.0-dev)? Cheers, -c On 21/03/2013, Luc More wrote: > Hi there, > > How do I build it (from source) on Ubuntu ? ?I installed the gstreamer-1.0 > from PPA stuff after apt-add-repository ppa:gstreamer-developers/ppa as > recommended in another message on this list. ?But this gets me only the > executables I guess. ?"make" says it won't find gstreamer-1.0. ?Is this a > FAQ? > I'd like to build from source because I patch it (I don't want Shotwell to > touch my?Iptc.Application2.Caption tag, even though I want other info to be > written to the image files). > > Luc > > > ________________________________ >? De?: Lucas Beeler > ??: shotwell > Envoy? le : Mercredi 13 mars 2013 2h24 > Objet?: [Shotwell] Call for Testing: Shotwell 0.14 > > Hi Shotwell Fans, > > Shotwell 0.14.0 is soon to be released! This upcoming version of > Shotwell packs a ton of new features, including: > > * A folder tree in the sidebar provides a directory-hierarchy view of > your Shotwell library > > * Dramatically improved user experience for RAW > photographers?long-standing bugs involving RAW developer switching > have been fixed > > * Comprehensive logging of photo and video import, including the > ability to save an import log file to disk. The log tracks which files > were detected as duplicates as well as files that couldn't be imported > due to disk or camera problems. > > * The Facebook Connector now uses the Facebook Graph API, resulting in > a smoother, more stable experience uploading photos and videos to > Facebook. As a bonus, Shotwell photo titles now appear as Facebook > photo captions! > > * The Shotwell video subsystem now relies on GStreamer 1.0, making for > easier, more stable video import, better video thumbnails, and better > handling of video metadata > > * New slideshow effects, improved Piwigo support, the ability to show > and hide the main Shotwell sidebar, and more... > > You can help us make Shotwell 0.14.0 the most stable Shotwell ever by > downloading the current development snapshot and testing it. To get > and test the latest code, you'll need to either pull from Shotwell git > master and build from source or, if you're on Ubuntu, install a > Shotwell daily build from the Yorba daily builds PPA. > > Pulling from Shotwell git master should be as easy as executing > > $ git clone git://yorba.org/shotwell > > on your system, and then building as usual with > > $ ./configure > $ make > # make install > > For Ubuntu users, the Shotwell daily builds PPA is located here: > https://launchpad.net/~yorba/+archive/daily-builds > > As always, we suggest backing up your Shotwell database before testing > pre-release code. You can learn how to do this by reading the "How can > I back up my Shotwell library?" section of the Shotwell FAQ here: > http://redmine.yorba.org/projects/shotwell/wiki/ShotwellFAQ > > Cheers, > Lucas > > ----------------------- > Lucas Beeler > Shotwell Technical Lead > Yorba Foundation > San Francisco, California > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > -- --------------------------- "I don't know what (b? - 4ac) equals, and I don't care," Tom said indiscriminately. _______________________________________________ Shotwell mailing list Shotwell at lists.yorba.org http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From clinton at yorba.org Thu Mar 21 23:11:48 2013 From: clinton at yorba.org (Clint Rogers) Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 16:11:48 -0700 Subject: [Shotwell] Call for Testing: Shotwell 0.14 In-Reply-To: <1363904724.87508.YahooMailNeo@web122302.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> References: <1363899234.45317.YahooMailNeo@web122306.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <1363903018.56740.YahooMailNeo@web122304.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <1363904724.87508.YahooMailNeo@web122302.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Hi again, On behalf of the team here, I'm glad it's working! Please let us know if you hit any other troublesome spots, and one of us will help you as soon as we can. Cheers, -c On 21/03/2013, Luc More wrote: > Build was fine. ?Startup OK. ?0.14 even found and auto-imported 3 corrupted > JPEGs that the older version had left there without managing to import them. > ?Now I'm going to test. > > Thanks for this great app ! > > Luc > > > ________________________________ > De?: Luc More > ??: Clint Rogers > Cc?: shotwell > Envoy? le : Jeudi 21 mars 2013 22h56 > Objet?: Re: [Shotwell] Call for Testing: Shotwell 0.14 > > Hi Clint, thanks for your quick response. > > Well the message I had found gave the names of the binary packages, but > apparently not all of these exist in the PPA under *-dev names. ?I had not > found any after randomly appending "-dev" to some of them. ?Now I've > installed the one you referred below but I get other errors and I'm clueless > about what the name of the corresponding package can be... > > I already had similar difficulty when I built 0.13 the previous time but > thanks to some ?searches and probably some help from this list I was able to > add all the necessary libs (and their sources). > > I'm not a frequent developer at all under Ubuntu and have no idea about how > to look up this kind of info into PPAs and stuff :-| > In an ideal world it would be really easier if I could find the list of > packages somehow... ?However google helped me find the names of what I > needed to install so now its built. ?I'll backup, install and test when > ready. > > > For reference, I needed also to install one additional .deb after the one > you mentioned. > > sudo apt-get install libgstreamer1.0-dev ?libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-dev > ./configure > make > > > Thanks ! > Luc > > > > > > ________________________________ > De?: Clint Rogers > ??: Luc More > Cc?: Lucas Beeler ; shotwell > Envoy? le : Jeudi 21 mars 2013 22h18 > Objet?: Re: [Shotwell] Call for Testing: Shotwell 0.14 > > Hi Luc, > > Did you also install the '-dev' packages (namely libgstreamer1.0-dev)? > > Cheers, > -c > > On 21/03/2013, Luc More wrote: >> Hi there, >> >> How do I build it (from source) on Ubuntu ? ?I installed the gstreamer-1.0 >> from PPA stuff after apt-add-repository ppa:gstreamer-developers/ppa as >> recommended in another message on this list. ?But this gets me only the >> executables I guess. ?"make" says it won't find gstreamer-1.0. ?Is this a >> FAQ? >> I'd like to build from source because I patch it (I don't want Shotwell to >> touch my?Iptc.Application2.Caption tag, even though I want other info to >> be >> written to the image files). >> >> Luc >> >> >> ________________________________ >>? De?: Lucas Beeler >> ??: shotwell >> Envoy? le : Mercredi 13 mars 2013 2h24 >> Objet?: [Shotwell] Call for Testing: Shotwell 0.14 >> >> Hi Shotwell Fans, >> >> Shotwell 0.14.0 is soon to be released! This upcoming version of >> Shotwell packs a ton of new features, including: >> >> * A folder tree in the sidebar provides a directory-hierarchy view of >> your Shotwell library >> >> * Dramatically improved user experience for RAW >> photographers?long-standing bugs involving RAW developer switching >> have been fixed >> >> * Comprehensive logging of photo and video import, including the >> ability to save an import log file to disk. The log tracks which files >> were detected as duplicates as well as files that couldn't be imported >> due to disk or camera problems. >> >> * The Facebook Connector now uses > the Facebook Graph API, resulting in >> a smoother, more stable experience uploading photos and videos to >> Facebook. As a bonus, Shotwell photo titles now appear as Facebook >> photo captions! >> >> * The Shotwell video subsystem now relies on GStreamer 1.0, making for >> easier, more stable video import, better video thumbnails, and better >> handling of video metadata >> >> * New slideshow effects, improved Piwigo support, the ability to show >> and hide the main Shotwell sidebar, and more... >> >> You can help us make Shotwell 0.14.0 the most stable Shotwell ever by >> downloading the current development snapshot and testing it. To get >> and test the latest code, you'll need to either pull from Shotwell git >> master and build from source or, if you're on Ubuntu, install a >> Shotwell daily build from the Yorba daily builds PPA. >> >> Pulling from Shotwell > git master should be as easy as executing >> >> $ git clone git://yorba.org/shotwell >> >> on your system, and then building as usual with >> >> $ ./configure >> $ make >> # make install >> >> For Ubuntu users, the Shotwell daily builds PPA is located here: >> https://launchpad.net/~yorba/+archive/daily-builds >> >> As always, we suggest backing up your Shotwell database before testing >> pre-release code. You can learn how to do this by reading the "How can >> I back up my Shotwell library?" section of the Shotwell FAQ here: >> http://redmine.yorba.org/projects/shotwell/wiki/ShotwellFAQ >> >> Cheers, >> Lucas >> >> ----------------------- >> Lucas Beeler >> Shotwell > Technical Lead >> Yorba Foundation >> San Francisco, California >> _______________________________________________ >> Shotwell mailing list >> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell >> _______________________________________________ >> Shotwell mailing list >> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell >> > > > -- > --------------------------- > "I don't know what (b? - 4ac) equals, and I don't care," Tom said > indiscriminately. > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell -- --------------------------- "I don't know what (b? - 4ac) equals, and I don't care," Tom said indiscriminately. From arzitek at yahoo.com Fri Mar 22 09:21:34 2013 From: arzitek at yahoo.com (Luc More) Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 02:21:34 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Shotwell] Re : Re: Call for Testing: Shotwell 0.14 Message-ID: <1363944094.43063.androidMobile@web122305.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> So far so good... I did some testing yesterday with the new RAW features and am happy to report that the RAW+JPEG pairing works like it should for me.? It shows the camera JPEG, starts Darktable when I asked, imported automatically the Darktable JPEG. I have 27000+ photos in my library after the upgrade and very happy camper so far ;-) Luc Envoy? par Yahoo! Mail (sur Android) From lucas at yorba.org Fri Mar 22 18:13:52 2013 From: lucas at yorba.org (Lucas Beeler) Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 11:13:52 -0700 Subject: [Shotwell] Shotwell 0.14 In-Reply-To: <514B5862.1030706@gmx.de> References: <514B5862.1030706@gmx.de> Message-ID: > 0.14 is a great release. Thanks all for this great step. > Thanks everybody, all coders, all testers, all users :-) Thank you Marc! Regards, Lucas ---------------------- Lucas Beeler Shotwell Project Technical Lead Yorba Foundation San Francisco, California On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Marc wrote: > Hi all, > > 0.14 is a great release. Thanks all for this great step. > Thanks everybody, all coders, all testers, all users :-) > > > Looking forward to next bugfixes and featurereleases > > kind regards > Marc > > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > From jim at yorba.org Fri Mar 22 19:38:14 2013 From: jim at yorba.org (Jim Nelson) Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 19:31:14 -0007 Subject: [Shotwell] Re : Re: Call for Testing: Shotwell 0.14 In-Reply-To: <1363944094.43063.androidMobile@web122305.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> References: <1363944094.43063.androidMobile@web122305.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <514cb309.0499420a.4d71.13aa@mx.google.com> This is great to hear. ?Improving the RAW experience was a top priority for this release, so it's gratifying to hear that our users are seeing the difference. -- Jim On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 2:21 AM, Luc More wrote: > So far so good... I did some testing yesterday with the new RAW > features and am happy to report that the RAW+JPEG pairing works like > it should for me.? It shows the camera JPEG, starts Darktable when I > asked, imported automatically the Darktable JPEG. > > I have 27000+ photos in my library after the upgrade and very happy > camper so far ;-) > > Luc > > Envoy? par Yahoo! Mail (sur Android) > > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > From arzitek at yahoo.com Fri Mar 22 21:44:48 2013 From: arzitek at yahoo.com (Luc More) Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 14:44:48 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Shotwell] Re : Re: Call for Testing: Shotwell 0.14 In-Reply-To: <514cb309.0499420a.4d71.13aa@mx.google.com> References: <1363944094.43063.androidMobile@web122305.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <514cb309.0499420a.4d71.13aa@mx.google.com> Message-ID: <1363988688.80836.YahooMailNeo@web122301.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Now some more findings from further tests with 0.14 built from source on Ubuntu 12.10: 1. Thanks a lot for the new multi-line Description field! ?I was missing that a lot in previous versions 2. Unfortunately the Flickr uploader does not seem to use it. ?A test upload (http://www.flickr.com/photos/arzitek/8581349856/) showed the Title being used in both supported fields on that site. 3. Moreover, these metadata are no longer written to the JPEG (not for RAW+JPEG and not for simple JPEG). ?I'm pretty sure that worked on simple JPEG in 0.13 (not sure about RAW in old versions). ?Of course I have the appropriate option set in Preferences. ?I don't know if that's a feature, it looks more like a bug of this early 0.14, could you confirm? 4. When exporting and selecting the Metadata option, both fields are exported in the resulting JPEG so I still have the workaround to use an external program (postr) to upload after exporting. ?With the added benefit to be able to use Shotwell to set both Title and Description which is still better than 0.13. ________________________________ De?: Jim Nelson ??: Luc More Cc?: "clinton at yorba.org" ; "shotwell at lists.yorba.org" Envoy? le : Vendredi 22 mars 2013 20h38 Objet?: Re: [Shotwell] Re : Re: Call for Testing: Shotwell 0.14 This is great to hear. ?Improving the RAW experience was a top priority for this release, so it's gratifying to hear that our users are seeing the difference. -- Jim On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 2:21 AM, Luc More wrote: So far so good... I did some testing yesterday with the new RAW features and am happy to report that the RAW+JPEG pairing works like it should for me.? It shows the camera JPEG, starts Darktable when I asked, imported automatically the Darktable JPEG. I have 27000+ photos in my library after the upgrade and very happy camper so far ;-) Luc Envoy? par Yahoo! Mail (sur Android) _______________________________________________ Shotwell mailing list Shotwell at lists.yorba.org http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From dougie at highmoor.co.uk Sat Mar 23 18:31:00 2013 From: dougie at highmoor.co.uk (Dougie Nisbet) Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 18:31:00 +0000 Subject: [Shotwell] install issues Message-ID: <514DF4E4.5030103@highmoor.co.uk> The source tarball link on the website is broken. Under download the source it returns the link http://yorba.org/download/shotwell/stable/shotwell-0.13.1.tar.xz I'm guessing it should be http://yorba.org/download/shotwell/stable/shotwell-0.14.0.tar.xz (which I've download). ./configure seemed to go ok, but make returns: dougie at phoenix:~/shotwell-0.14.0$ make #Shotwell requires Vala compiler 0.18.0 or greater. No valac found in path or $VALAC. make: *** [valacheck] Error 1 dougie at phoenix:~/shotwell-0.14.0$ I downloaded and installed vala 0.19 which seemed to go fine and rebooted. I'm not too worried as I don't think there are any new features I need but if it's a trivial thing I'm missing then it would be nice to be running 0.14. I'm on Linux Mint Debian. Dougie From dougie at highmoor.co.uk Sat Mar 23 19:22:08 2013 From: dougie at highmoor.co.uk (Dougie Nisbet) Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 19:22:08 +0000 Subject: [Shotwell] install issues In-Reply-To: <514DF4E4.5030103@highmoor.co.uk> References: <514DF4E4.5030103@highmoor.co.uk> Message-ID: <514E00E0.1090205@highmoor.co.uk> On 23/03/2013 18:31, Dougie Nisbet wrote: > > ./configure seemed to go ok, but make returns: > dougie at phoenix:~/shotwell-0.14.0$ make > #Shotwell requires Vala compiler 0.18.0 or greater. No valac found in > path or $VALAC. > make: *** [valacheck] Error 1 > dougie at phoenix:~/shotwell-0.14.0$ > aha. If I download and install Vala 0.18 (not 0.19) I get a different set of errors. Will see if I can resolve some of those dependencies ... dougie at phoenix:~/shotwell-0.14.0$ make Requested 'gexiv2 >= 0.4.90' but version of GExiv2 is 0.4.1 Package gstreamer-1.0 was not found in the pkg-config search path. Perhaps you should add the directory containing `gstreamer-1.0.pc' to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable No package 'gstreamer-1.0' found Package gstreamer-base-1.0 was not found in the pkg-config search path. Perhaps you should add the directory containing `gstreamer-base-1.0.pc' to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable No package 'gstreamer-base-1.0' found Package gstreamer-plugins-base-1.0 was not found in the pkg-config search path. Perhaps you should add the directory containing `gstreamer-plugins-base-1.0.pc' to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable No package 'gstreamer-plugins-base-1.0' found Package gstreamer-pbutils-1.0 was not found in the pkg-config search path. Perhaps you should add the directory containing `gstreamer-pbutils-1.0.pc' to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable No package 'gstreamer-pbutils-1.0' found make: *** [valacheck] Error 1 dougie at phoenix:~/shotwell-0.14.0$ From clanlaw at googlemail.com Sat Mar 23 21:09:25 2013 From: clanlaw at googlemail.com (Colin Law) Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 21:09:25 +0000 Subject: [Shotwell] install issues In-Reply-To: <514E00E0.1090205@highmoor.co.uk> References: <514DF4E4.5030103@highmoor.co.uk> <514E00E0.1090205@highmoor.co.uk> Message-ID: On 23 March 2013 19:22, Dougie Nisbet wrote: > On 23/03/2013 18:31, Dougie Nisbet wrote: >> >> >> ./configure seemed to go ok, but make returns: >> dougie at phoenix:~/shotwell-0.14.0$ make >> #Shotwell requires Vala compiler 0.18.0 or greater. No valac found in >> path or $VALAC. >> make: *** [valacheck] Error 1 >> dougie at phoenix:~/shotwell-0.14.0$ >> > aha. If I download and install Vala 0.18 (not 0.19) I get a different set of > errors. Will see if I can resolve some of those dependencies ... > > > dougie at phoenix:~/shotwell-0.14.0$ make > Requested 'gexiv2 >= 0.4.90' but version of GExiv2 is 0.4.1 > Package gstreamer-1.0 was not found in the pkg-config search path. You need to install gstreamer1.0-dev and libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-dev. Dependent on which version of Ubuntu you are using you may need the gstreamer developers ppa ppa:gstreamer-developers/ppa before those will install. Try it and add the ppa if necessary. Colin From dougie at highmoor.co.uk Sun Mar 24 08:44:28 2013 From: dougie at highmoor.co.uk (Dougie Nisbet) Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 08:44:28 +0000 Subject: [Shotwell] install issues In-Reply-To: References: <514DF4E4.5030103@highmoor.co.uk> <514E00E0.1090205@highmoor.co.uk> Message-ID: <514EBCEC.9080606@highmoor.co.uk> On 23/03/2013 21:09, Colin Law wrote: > > You need to install gstreamer1.0-dev and libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-dev. > > Dependent on which version of Ubuntu you are using you may need the > gstreamer developers ppa ppa:gstreamer-developers/ppa before those > will install. Try it and add the ppa if necessary. When looking into the problem I read back through the list and found your comments. Unfortunately I'm on Debian (Mint) and the PPAs seem to be for Ubuntu. I could give it a whirl but I don't need to be bleeding edge for the moment so I may just stick on 0.13.1 for the time being. Dougie From clanlaw at googlemail.com Sun Mar 24 08:52:56 2013 From: clanlaw at googlemail.com (Colin Law) Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 08:52:56 +0000 Subject: [Shotwell] install issues In-Reply-To: <514EBCEC.9080606@highmoor.co.uk> References: <514DF4E4.5030103@highmoor.co.uk> <514E00E0.1090205@highmoor.co.uk> <514EBCEC.9080606@highmoor.co.uk> Message-ID: On 24 March 2013 08:44, Dougie Nisbet wrote: > On 23/03/2013 21:09, Colin Law wrote: >> >> >> You need to install gstreamer1.0-dev and libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-dev. >> >> Dependent on which version of Ubuntu you are using you may need the >> gstreamer developers ppa ppa:gstreamer-developers/ppa before those >> will install. Try it and add the ppa if necessary. > > > When looking into the problem I read back through the list and found your > comments. Unfortunately I'm on Debian (Mint) In that case you have my sympathy but there is not much I can do to help. [OT]To be pedantic I believe Mint is actually based on Ubuntu which is based on Debian. Colin > and the PPAs seem to be for > Ubuntu. I could give it a whirl but I don't need to be bleeding edge for the > moment so I may just stick on 0.13.1 for the time being. From rehmann at math.uni-bielefeld.de Sun Mar 24 22:03:32 2013 From: rehmann at math.uni-bielefeld.de (Ulf Rehmann) Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 23:03:32 +0100 Subject: [Shotwell] Call for Translations: Shotwell 0.14! How about bug #4300 ? Resolved! In-Reply-To: (message from Clint Rogers on Tue, 19 Mar 2013 16:34:04 -0700) Message-ID: <87boa81mmj.fsf@math.uni-bielefeld.de> Hi Clint and Jim, Thank you for your reply (see below). To me, it seems that bug #4300 now has been fixed in 0.14.0+trunk in today's version from http://ppa.launchpad.net/yorba/daily-builds/ubuntu I would like to very much thank you and everybody else who helped resolving this! All the best, Ulf ------------------------------------------------- In-Reply-To: <877gl3dmu3.fsf at rhea.lan> Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 16:34:04 -0700 Subject: Re: [Shotwell] Call for Translations: Shotwell 0.14! How about bug #4300 ? From: Clint Rogers To: Ulf Rehmann Cc: Jim Nelson , shotwell at lists.yorba.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Ulf, You're absolutely right - we can reproduce this there, I just saw it - and it appears to be a logic problem. The main library view, as well as the event view that contains all the thumbnails is a kind of object in the code known as a CollectionPage; as I recall, the filters for each kind of CollectionPage can be set individually. It looks as if, in this case, not showing 'rejecteds' simply isn't being propagated from the library CollectionPage (having the search/filter bar present also applies the filter, which explains why it behaves the way it does when you press F8). Thank you for alerting us to this; I'll reopen the ticket in question right away, and we'll work on getting this fixed. Thanks again, -c On 19/03/2013, Ulf Rehmann wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > I have installed shotwell 0.14 (on Ubuntu 12.10). It works well so far > for me: thanks to everybody who helps developing this great system! > > However, it seems that bug #4300 is only partially fixed. > > If shotwell starts with no searchbar activated, then under "Library", > the rejected pages are not displayed, as they should. > > However, if one opens an event collection or a tagged collection > containing rejected pages these are displayed, but they should not. > > Pressing F8 once (or more times) for such an event or tagged collection > will make the rejected pages dissappear, but only for that collection for > which F8 was pressed. > > If shotwell is started with searchbar activated (e.g., because it before > was closed in that state), all rejected pages are initially not > displayed as they should. However, pressing F8 (i.e., toogling off the > search bar) puts it into the state described above. > > It would be nice if this could be fixed: Rejected pages initially should > not be shown within any collection, no matter if the search bar is on or > off (possibly unless the system is configured otherwise, if such a > config option is intended). > > Any comments? > > All the best, > Ulf > > > ------------------------------------------- > Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 19:43:14 -0008 > From: Jim Nelson > Subject: Re: [Shotwell] Call for Translations: Shotwell 0.14! How about bug > #4300 ? > To: Ulf Rehmann > Cc: Lucas Beeler , shotwell at lists.yorba.org > In-Reply-To: <87y5eb2xdh.fsf at rhea.lan> > Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-m+JhXYiYK1qrbSOVxWnc" > > > [1:text/plain Hide] > > Hi Ulf, > > Yes, we're hoping to have that fixed for 0.14. > > -- Jim > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 2:16 AM, Ulf Rehmann > wrote: > > Hi Lucas, > > Thanks for the good news concerning 0.14! > > Here is a question: Will the new release contain a fix of bug #4300? > > See below. > > Best regards, > Ulf > > > ------------------------- > > Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 01:19:40 -0008 > From: Jim Nelson > Subject: Re: [Shotwell] Again: Bug #4300 Shotwell view state is incorrect at > > startup > To: Ulf Rehmann > Cc: shotwell at lists.yorba.org > In-Reply-To: <87fw3s7yjx.fsf at rhea.lan> > Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-gPSIVqCTMVddXW/af6Tv" > > > [1:text/plain Hide] > > Hi Ulf, > > I can reproduce the problem you're seeing. ?I've re-opened the bug for 0.14. > > > -- Jim > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Ulf Rehmann wrote: > > It seems that bug #4300 is still not fixed (or was revived). > > Pages rated "Rejected" are initially shown in version 13.0 as well as in > 13.1. > > As far as I can tell, the code to fix this problem as mentioned on > http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4300 is (in slightly modified version) > contained in > my 13.1 sources, but does not seem to work. > > I am working on Ubuntu 12.10. > > Can anybody help? > > Best regards > Ulf > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > > > [2:text/html Show] > > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > > [2:text/html Show] > > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > -- --------------------------- "I don't know what (b? - 4ac) equals, and I don't care," Tom said indiscriminately. From xavierviader at gmail.com Sun Mar 24 23:44:02 2013 From: xavierviader at gmail.com (Xavi) Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 00:44:02 +0100 Subject: [Shotwell] Sotwell 0.14 in Precise In-Reply-To: References: <5149ACD5.7010702@csordaslaszlo.hu> <514A38F2.6090704@gmail.com> Message-ID: <514F8FC2.2050608@gmail.com> |Hi, I've just updated: http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/3943 On Ubuntu 12.04 compiling from source all events are ok. Xavi | Al 21/03/13 01:52, En/na Lucas Beeler ha escrit: > Hi Xavi, > > We just fixed this. The problem was subtle and involved a bogus > strftime format specifier. Feel free to pull from master and build > from source if you want to get the fix right away. > > Lucas > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 3:32 PM, xavi wrote: >> Hi, >> thanks yorba for your job. >> >> I've tested 0.14 in precise 12.0.4 amb almost everything it's ok. I still >> found wrong event dates like described in >> http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/3943. >> >> I've tested in Spanish and in Catalan and with both I got the same use. In >> English everything was ok. >> >> Xavi >> >> On 20/03/13 22:57, Lucas Beeler wrote: >>> Hi csola, >>> >>>> Error: The next dependence cannot be >>>> satisfied: >>>> libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-0 (>= 1.0.0) >>>> >>>> Why?... :( >>> You need to add the GStreamer developers PPA to your system to get an >>> updated version of GStreamer. The PPA URL is >>> https://launchpad.net/~gstreamer-developers/+archive/ppa. >>> >>> Lucas >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 5:34 AM, csola wrote: >>>> Deat Shotwell.... >>>> >>>> Ubuntu 12.04.02 LTS: cannot be installed Shotwell 0.14... >>>> >>>> Error: The next dependence cannot be satisfied: >>>> libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-0 (>= 1.0.0) >>>> >>>> Why?... :( >>>> >>>> csola >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Shotwell mailing list >>>> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >>>> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Shotwell mailing list >>> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >>> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Shotwell mailing list >> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 900 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From xavierviader at gmail.com Sun Mar 24 23:46:35 2013 From: xavierviader at gmail.com (Xavi) Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 00:46:35 +0100 Subject: [Shotwell] Shotwell 0.14 on debian wheezy Message-ID: <514F905B.4030700@gmail.com> Hi, |I've been trying to get shotwell 0.14 working on my Debian Testing (wheezy) but no success !! After installing some of dependencies (by adding unstable and sid sources), when I try to compile shotwell i got these and I have no clue ho to get working gexiv2: # ./configure Detected libGPhoto 2.4.x - using default code path. Configured. Type 'make' to build, 'make install' to install. # make Requested 'gexiv2 >= 0.4.90' but version of GExiv2 is 0.4.1 make: *** [valacheck] Error 1| Any idea? thanks Xavi PS: here you are all I've done: deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian sid main contrib non-free apt-get update apt-get install libgconf2-dev libgee-dev libgexiv2-dev libglib2.0-dev libgstreamer1.0-dev libgstreamer-plugins-base1.0-dev libgtk-3-dev libgudev-1.0-dev libexif-dev libgphoto2-2-dev libraw-dev librest-dev libsoup2.4-dev libxml2-dev libsqlite3-dev m4 libjson-glib-dev libwebkitgtk-3.0-dev download and install valac 0.18.1 git clone git://yorba.org/shotwell ----------- # ./configure Detected libGPhoto 2.4.x - using default code path. Configured. Type 'make' to build, 'make install' to install. # make Requested 'gexiv2 >= 0.4.90' but version of GExiv2 is 0.4.1 make: *** [valacheck] Error 1 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 900 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From dougie at highmoor.co.uk Mon Mar 25 07:45:48 2013 From: dougie at highmoor.co.uk (Dougie Nisbet) Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 07:45:48 +0000 Subject: [Shotwell] Shotwell 0.14 on debian wheezy In-Reply-To: <514F905B.4030700@gmail.com> References: <514F905B.4030700@gmail.com> Message-ID: <515000AC.1070706@highmoor.co.uk> On 24/03/2013 23:46, Xavi wrote: > Hi, > |I've been trying to get shotwell 0.14 working on my Debian Testing > (wheezy) but no success !! I've been down a similar path with a newly installed Debian Testing with similar results. The only thing I perhaps tried that you haven't mentioned is adding the line: deb http:///ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ experimental main to my sources.list and trying to manually install some of the dependencies from: http://packages.debian.org/experimental/amd64/shotwell/download but the results look similar. Interestingly I've not gone from running 0.13.1 to 0.12.3 (the default version for Wheezy) and not missing anything essential yet. Dougie From rolf.steinort at gmail.com Mon Mar 25 15:14:25 2013 From: rolf.steinort at gmail.com (Rolf Steinort) Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 16:14:25 +0100 Subject: [Shotwell] Shotwell 0.14 on debian wheezy In-Reply-To: <515000AC.1070706@highmoor.co.uk> References: <514F905B.4030700@gmail.com> <515000AC.1070706@highmoor.co.uk> Message-ID: <515069D1.2070702@gmail.com> On 25.03.2013 08:45, Dougie Nisbet wrote: > On 24/03/2013 23:46, Xavi wrote: >> Hi, >> |I've been trying to get shotwell 0.14 working on my Debian Testing >> (wheezy) but no success !! > > I've been down a similar path with a newly installed Debian Testing > with similar results. The only thing I perhaps tried that you haven't > mentioned is adding the line: > > deb http:///ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ experimental main > > to my sources.list and trying to manually install some of the > dependencies from: > > http://packages.debian.org/experimental/amd64/shotwell/download > > but the results look similar. > > Interestingly I've not gone from running 0.13.1 to 0.12.3 (the default > version for Wheezy) and not missing anything essential yet. I installed 0.14 from experimental, it's there already compiled. http://packages.debian.org/experimental/gnome/shotwell Works like a charm, only importing takes ages. Rolf http://meetthegimp.org From dougie at highmoor.co.uk Mon Mar 25 16:17:02 2013 From: dougie at highmoor.co.uk (Dougie Nisbet) Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 16:17:02 +0000 Subject: [Shotwell] Shotwell 0.14 on debian wheezy In-Reply-To: <515069D1.2070702@gmail.com> References: <514F905B.4030700@gmail.com> <515000AC.1070706@highmoor.co.uk> <515069D1.2070702@gmail.com> Message-ID: On 25 March 2013 15:14, Rolf Steinort wrote: > On 25.03.2013 08:45, Dougie Nisbet wrote: >> >> deb http:///ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ experimental main >> >> to my sources.list and trying to manually install some of the dependencies >> from: >> >> http://packages.debian.org/experimental/amd64/shotwell/download >> >> but the results look similar. >> >> Interestingly I've not gone from running 0.13.1 to 0.12.3 (the default >> version for Wheezy) and not missing anything essential yet. > > > I installed 0.14 from experimental, it's there already compiled. > http://packages.debian.org/experimental/gnome/shotwell > um, yes it was the experimental package I tried, except that it was the 64 bit version. Could try the 32bit I guess but doubt it'd make any difference. Are you on Debian Testing? Dougie From joseph.bylund at gmail.com Mon Mar 25 16:23:12 2013 From: joseph.bylund at gmail.com (Joseph Bylund) Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 12:23:12 -0400 Subject: [Shotwell] Shotwell 0.14 on debian wheezy In-Reply-To: References: <514F905B.4030700@gmail.com> <515000AC.1070706@highmoor.co.uk> <515069D1.2070702@gmail.com> Message-ID: <515079F0.4010306@gmail.com> I'm on a different system (ubuntu), but I used the yorba gexiv2 and the dev exiv2 in addition to the yorba shotwell, which means my system package manager doesn't need to worry about too much. Maybe it's worth trying that instead of using all system packages? -Joe Here's the script that keeps my shotwell (and dependencies) current: #!/bin/bash update-alternatives --set valac /usr/bin/valac-0.18 export valac=/usr/bin/valac-0.18 mkdir -p /root/shotwell cd /root/shotwell # first do exiv2 mkdir -p exiv2 && cd exiv2 svn checkout svn://dev.exiv2.org/svn/trunk > /dev/null svn update > /dev/null cd trunk ./bootstrap.linux > /dev/null cd build cmake .. > /dev/null || exit make -j 9 > /dev/null || exit make -j 9 install > /dev/null || exit cd /root/shotwell # then do gexiv cd gexiv2 || git clone git://git.yorba.org/gexiv2 git pull > /dev/null cd /root/shotwell/gexiv2 ./configure > /dev/null || exit make -j 9 || exit make -j 9 install || exit cd /root/shotwell # then do shotwell cd shotwell || git clone git://yorba.org/shotwell && cd shotwell cd /root/shotwell/shotwell git pull > /dev/null ./configure /dev/null || exit make -j 9 >/dev/null || exit make -j 9 install || exit On 03/25/2013 12:17 PM, Dougie Nisbet wrote: > On 25 March 2013 15:14, Rolf Steinort wrote: >> On 25.03.2013 08:45, Dougie Nisbet wrote: >>> deb http:///ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ experimental main >>> >>> to my sources.list and trying to manually install some of the dependencies >>> from: >>> >>> http://packages.debian.org/experimental/amd64/shotwell/download >>> >>> but the results look similar. >>> >>> Interestingly I've not gone from running 0.13.1 to 0.12.3 (the default >>> version for Wheezy) and not missing anything essential yet. >> >> I installed 0.14 from experimental, it's there already compiled. >> http://packages.debian.org/experimental/gnome/shotwell >> > um, yes it was the experimental package I tried, except that it was > the 64 bit version. Could try the 32bit I guess but doubt it'd make > any difference. Are you on Debian Testing? > > Dougie > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From rolf.steinort at gmail.com Mon Mar 25 17:46:04 2013 From: rolf.steinort at gmail.com (Rolf Steinort) Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 18:46:04 +0100 Subject: [Shotwell] Shotwell 0.14 on debian wheezy In-Reply-To: References: <514F905B.4030700@gmail.com> <515000AC.1070706@highmoor.co.uk> <515069D1.2070702@gmail.com> Message-ID: <51508D5C.1080605@gmail.com> On 25.03.2013 17:17, Dougie Nisbet wrote: > On 25 March 2013 15:14, Rolf Steinort wrote: >> On 25.03.2013 08:45, Dougie Nisbet wrote: >>> deb http:///ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ experimental main >>> >>> to my sources.list and trying to manually install some of the dependencies >>> from: >>> >>> http://packages.debian.org/experimental/amd64/shotwell/download >>> >>> but the results look similar. >>> >>> Interestingly I've not gone from running 0.13.1 to 0.12.3 (the default >>> version for Wheezy) and not missing anything essential yet. >> >> I installed 0.14 from experimental, it's there already compiled. >> http://packages.debian.org/experimental/gnome/shotwell >> > um, yes it was the experimental package I tried, except that it was > the 64 bit version. Could try the 32bit I guess but doubt it'd make > any difference. Are you on Debian Testing? Yes, Wheezy 64 bit with some Experimental filled in. $ dpkg -l shotwell Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend |/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name Version Architecture Description +++-==============-============-============-================================= ii shotwell 0.14.0-1 amd64 digital photo organizer Rolf > From lucas at yorba.org Mon Mar 25 19:41:57 2013 From: lucas at yorba.org (Lucas Beeler) Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 12:41:57 -0700 Subject: [Shotwell] Re : Re: Call for Testing: Shotwell 0.14 In-Reply-To: <1363988688.80836.YahooMailNeo@web122301.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> References: <1363944094.43063.androidMobile@web122305.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <514cb309.0499420a.4d71.13aa@mx.google.com> <1363988688.80836.YahooMailNeo@web122301.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Hi Luc, > Unfortunately the Flickr uploader does not seem to use it. By "Flickr uploader" do you mean the Flickr Connector inside of Shotwell? Cheers, Lucas On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Luc More wrote: > Now some more findings from further tests with 0.14 built from source on Ubuntu 12.10: > > 1. Thanks a lot for the new multi-line Description field! I was missing that a lot in previous versions > 2. Unfortunately the Flickr uploader does not seem to use it. A test upload (http://www.flickr.com/photos/arzitek/8581349856/) showed the Title being used in both supported fields on that site. > 3. Moreover, these metadata are no longer written to the JPEG (not for RAW+JPEG and not for simple JPEG). I'm pretty sure that worked on simple JPEG in 0.13 (not sure about RAW in old versions). Of course I have the appropriate option set in Preferences. I don't know if that's a feature, it looks more like a bug of this early 0.14, could you confirm? > 4. When exporting and selecting the Metadata option, both fields are exported in the resulting JPEG so I still have the workaround to use an external program (postr) to upload after exporting. With the added benefit to be able to use Shotwell to set both Title and Description which is still better than 0.13. > > > ________________________________ > De : Jim Nelson > ? : Luc More > Cc : "clinton at yorba.org" ; "shotwell at lists.yorba.org" > Envoy? le : Vendredi 22 mars 2013 20h38 > Objet : Re: [Shotwell] Re : Re: Call for Testing: Shotwell 0.14 > > > This is great to hear. Improving the RAW experience was a top priority for this release, so it's gratifying to hear that our users are seeing the difference. > > -- Jim > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 2:21 AM, Luc More wrote: > > So far so good... I did some testing yesterday with the new RAW features and am happy to report that the RAW+JPEG pairing works like it should for me. It shows the camera JPEG, starts Darktable when I asked, imported automatically the Darktable JPEG. I have 27000+ photos in my library after the upgrade and very happy camper so far ;-) Luc Envoy? par Yahoo! Mail (sur Android) _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From depaola.andrea at gmail.com Mon Mar 25 22:02:20 2013 From: depaola.andrea at gmail.com (Andrea De Paola) Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 23:02:20 +0100 Subject: [Shotwell] Backup folders Message-ID: <20130325230220.701870d4@andrea-System-Product-Name> Hello everybody I was using shotwell on debian, and I did a backup of my Pictures folder and the folder ~/.shotwell, where there was the database and the thumbnails of the pictures. Now I'm using shotwell 0.13.1 on Linux Mint 14 (Nadia) and I'm still doing the backup of my Pictures folder, but there isn't the ~/.shotwell folder anymore. Where is it saving the database and the thumbnails? Which folders do I need to backup so I could be sure that I could restore all the pictures with the tags I put on them? Thanks Andrea From lucas at yorba.org Mon Mar 25 22:05:27 2013 From: lucas at yorba.org (Lucas Beeler) Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 15:05:27 -0700 Subject: [Shotwell] Backup folders In-Reply-To: <20130325230220.701870d4@andrea-System-Product-Name> References: <20130325230220.701870d4@andrea-System-Product-Name> Message-ID: Hi Andrea, > but there isn't the ~/.shotwell > folder anymore. Where is it > saving the database and the > thumbnails? This is explained in the "How can I back up my Shotwell library?" section of the Shotwell FAQ here: http://redmine.yorba.org/projects/shotwell/wiki/ShotwellFAQ. Cheers, Lucas On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Andrea De Paola wrote: > Hello everybody > > I was using shotwell on debian, and I did a backup of my Pictures > folder and the folder ~/.shotwell, where there was the database and the > thumbnails of the pictures. > > Now I'm using shotwell 0.13.1 on Linux Mint 14 (Nadia) and I'm still > doing the backup of my Pictures folder, but there isn't the ~/.shotwell > folder anymore. Where is it saving the database and the thumbnails? > Which folders do I need to backup so I could be sure that I could > restore all the pictures with the tags I put on them? > > Thanks > Andrea > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From depaola.andrea at gmail.com Mon Mar 25 22:36:23 2013 From: depaola.andrea at gmail.com (Andrea De Paola) Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 23:36:23 +0100 Subject: [Shotwell] Backup folders In-Reply-To: References: <20130325230220.701870d4@andrea-System-Product-Name> Message-ID: <20130325233623.40260508@andrea-System-Product-Name> On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 15:05:27 -0700 Lucas Beeler wrote: > This is explained in the "How can I back up my Shotwell library?" > section of the Shotwell FAQ here: > http://redmine.yorba.org/projects/shotwell/wiki/ShotwellFAQ. > > Cheers, > Lucas Thank you very much Lucas. Sorry for the question, I didn't see it in the FAQ :( Andrea From arzitek at yahoo.com Tue Mar 26 10:33:24 2013 From: arzitek at yahoo.com (Luc More) Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 03:33:24 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Shotwell] Re : Re: Call for Testing: Shotwell 0.14 In-Reply-To: References: <1363944094.43063.androidMobile@web122305.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <514cb309.0499420a.4d71.13aa@mx.google.com> <1363988688.80836.YahooMailNeo@web122301.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1364294004.91364.YahooMailNeo@web122301.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Hi Lucas, Yes I meant the Shotwell Connect function with upload to Flickr.? The URL below refers to my testing and the photo title appears in both Flickr fields (the short title and the long description) even though I have something else in Shotwell in the long description field.? This is not critical for me as I'm using another program anyway (postr) to publish.? I don't use Shotwell Connect towards Flickr because I like to choose sets and groups at the same time as I upload, which is not (yet?) supported by Shotwell Connect. Currently I use Export from Shotwell, then a script that does some fiddling with metadata on the exported JPEGs, then calls Postr to do the actual upload.? A little bit convoluted but it works for me.? I was already doing something similar in 0.13. Luc ________________________________ De?: Lucas Beeler ??: Luc More Cc?: Jim Nelson ; "shotwell at lists.yorba.org" Envoy? le : Lundi 25 mars 2013 20h41 Objet?: Re: [Shotwell] Re : Re: Call for Testing: Shotwell 0.14 Hi Luc, > Unfortunately the Flickr uploader does not seem to use it. By "Flickr uploader" do you mean the Flickr Connector inside of Shotwell? Cheers, Lucas On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Luc More wrote: > Now some more findings from further tests with 0.14 built from source on Ubuntu 12.10: > >? ? ? ? 1. Thanks a lot for the new multi-line Description field!? I was missing that a lot in previous versions >? ? ? ? 2. Unfortunately the Flickr uploader does not seem to use it.? A test upload (http://www.flickr.com/photos/arzitek/8581349856/) showed the Title being used in both supported fields on that site. >? ? ? ? 3. Moreover, these metadata are no longer written to the JPEG (not for RAW+JPEG and not for simple JPEG).? I'm pretty sure that worked on simple JPEG in 0.13 (not sure about RAW in old versions).? Of course I have the appropriate option set in Preferences.? I don't know if that's a feature, it looks more like a bug of this early 0.14, could you confirm? >? ? ? ? 4. When exporting and selecting the Metadata option, both fields are exported in the resulting JPEG so I still have the workaround to use an external program (postr) to upload after exporting.? With the added benefit to be able to use Shotwell to set both Title and Description which is still better than 0.13. > > > ________________________________ >? De : Jim Nelson > ? : Luc More > Cc : "clinton at yorba.org" ; "shotwell at lists.yorba.org" > Envoy? le : Vendredi 22 mars 2013 20h38 > Objet : Re: [Shotwell] Re : Re:? Call for Testing: Shotwell 0.14 > > > This is great to hear.? Improving the RAW experience was a top priority for this release, so it's gratifying to hear that our users are seeing the difference. > > -- Jim > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 2:21 AM, Luc More wrote: > > So far so good... I did some testing yesterday with the new RAW features and am happy to report that the RAW+JPEG pairing works like it should for me.? It shows the camera JPEG, starts Darktable when I asked, imported automatically the Darktable JPEG. I have 27000+ photos in my library after the upgrade and very happy camper so far ;-) Luc Envoy? par Yahoo! Mail (sur Android) _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From cpolymeris at gmail.com Tue Mar 26 15:03:10 2013 From: cpolymeris at gmail.com (Camilo Polymeris) Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 11:03:10 -0400 Subject: [Shotwell] Call for Testing: Shotwell 0.14 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Lucas Beeler wrote: > Pulling from Shotwell git master should be as easy as executing > > $ git clone git://yorba.org/shotwell > > on your system, and then building as usual with > > $ ./configure > $ make > # make install Hello. I get the following segfault when running this version (git master) of Shotwell: Reading symbols from /home/camilo/Proyectos/shotwell/shotwell...done. (gdb) run Starting program: /home/camilo/Proyectos/shotwell/shotwell [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1". [New Thread 0x7fffe55c7700 (LWP 3938)] Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x00007ffff15ba95c in g_type_check_instance_is_a () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0 (gdb) bt #0 0x00007ffff15ba95c in g_type_check_instance_is_a () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #1 0x00007ffff159e486 in g_object_unref () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0 #2 0x00000000007b178d in resources_add_stock_icon_from_themed_icon ( gicon=0xc9eef0, stock_id=0x96d98e "flag-page", modify=0, modify_target=0x0) at /home/camilo/Proyectos/shotwell/src/Resources.vala:883 #3 0x00000000007af60f in resources_init () at /home/camilo/Proyectos/shotwell/src/Resources.vala:667 #4 0x000000000067945b in _vala_main (args=0x7fffffffe418, args_length1=1) at /home/camilo/Proyectos/shotwell/src/main.vala:405 #5 0x000000000067985c in main (argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffe418) at /home/camilo/Proyectos/shotwell/src/main.vala:317 (gdb) Note I am not running the gnome shell. Also, camilo at obsidiana:~/Proyectos/shotwell$ valac --version Vala 0.19.0.9-3fd4 Regards, Camilo From lucas at yorba.org Tue Mar 26 20:07:05 2013 From: lucas at yorba.org (Lucas Beeler) Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 13:07:05 -0700 Subject: [Shotwell] Re : Re: Call for Testing: Shotwell 0.14 In-Reply-To: <1364294004.91364.YahooMailNeo@web122301.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> References: <1363944094.43063.androidMobile@web122305.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <514cb309.0499420a.4d71.13aa@mx.google.com> <1363988688.80836.YahooMailNeo@web122301.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <1364294004.91364.YahooMailNeo@web122301.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Hi Luc, > The URL below refers to my testing and > the photo title appears in both Flickr fields > (the short title and the long description) even > though I have something else in Shotwell in > the long description field. As of right now, the Flickr Connector does not support uploading comments. This is ticketed, however, as a feature for an upcoming release here: http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/6685. > Moreover, these metadata are no longer > written to the JPEG (not for RAW+JPEG > and not for simple JPEG). By "these metadata" do you mean the comment field? Lucas On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 3:33 AM, Luc More wrote: > Hi Lucas, > > Yes I meant the Shotwell Connect function with upload to Flickr. The URL > below refers to my testing and the photo title appears in both Flickr fields > (the short title and the long description) even though I have something else > in Shotwell in the long description field. This is not critical for me as > I'm using another program anyway (postr) to publish. I don't use Shotwell > Connect towards Flickr because I like to choose sets and groups at the same > time as I upload, which is not (yet?) supported by Shotwell Connect. > > Currently I use Export from Shotwell, then a script that does some fiddling > with metadata on the exported JPEGs, then calls Postr to do the actual > upload. A little bit convoluted but it works for me. I was already doing > something similar in 0.13. > > Luc > > ________________________________ > De : Lucas Beeler > ? : Luc More > Cc : Jim Nelson ; "shotwell at lists.yorba.org" > > Envoy? le : Lundi 25 mars 2013 20h41 > > Objet : Re: [Shotwell] Re : Re: Call for Testing: Shotwell 0.14 > > Hi Luc, > >> Unfortunately the Flickr uploader does not seem to use it. > > By "Flickr uploader" do you mean the Flickr Connector inside of Shotwell? > > Cheers, > Lucas > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Luc More wrote: >> Now some more findings from further tests with 0.14 built from source on >> Ubuntu 12.10: >> >> 1. Thanks a lot for the new multi-line Description field! I was >> missing that a lot in previous versions >> 2. Unfortunately the Flickr uploader does not seem to use it. A >> test upload (http://www.flickr.com/photos/arzitek/8581349856/) showed the >> Title being used in both supported fields on that site. >> 3. Moreover, these metadata are no longer written to the JPEG (not >> for RAW+JPEG and not for simple JPEG). I'm pretty sure that worked on >> simple JPEG in 0.13 (not sure about RAW in old versions). Of course I have >> the appropriate option set in Preferences. I don't know if that's a >> feature, it looks more like a bug of this early 0.14, could you confirm? >> 4. When exporting and selecting the Metadata option, both fields >> are exported in the resulting JPEG so I still have the workaround to use an >> external program (postr) to upload after exporting. With the added benefit >> to be able to use Shotwell to set both Title and Description which is still >> better than 0.13. >> >> >> ________________________________ >> De : Jim Nelson >> ? : Luc More >> Cc : "clinton at yorba.org" ; "shotwell at lists.yorba.org" >> >> Envoy? le : Vendredi 22 mars 2013 20h38 >> Objet : Re: [Shotwell] Re : Re: Call for Testing: Shotwell 0.14 >> >> >> This is great to hear. Improving the RAW experience was a top priority >> for this release, so it's gratifying to hear that our users are seeing the >> difference. >> >> -- Jim >> >> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 2:21 AM, Luc More wrote: >> >> So far so good... I did some testing yesterday with the new RAW features >> and am happy to report that the RAW+JPEG pairing works like it should for >> me. It shows the camera JPEG, starts Darktable when I asked, imported >> automatically the Darktable JPEG. I have 27000+ photos in my library after >> the upgrade and very happy camper so far ;-) Luc Envoy? par Yahoo! Mail (sur >> Android) _______________________________________________ >> Shotwell mailing list >> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell >> _______________________________________________ >> Shotwell mailing list >> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > > From lucas at yorba.org Tue Mar 26 20:08:47 2013 From: lucas at yorba.org (Lucas Beeler) Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 13:08:47 -0700 Subject: [Shotwell] Call for Testing: Shotwell 0.14 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Camilo, > I get the following segfault when > running this version (git master) > of Shotwell: What is your distro and system configuration? Does the same problem occur when you try building and running the 0.14.0 stable tarball? Lucas On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Camilo Polymeris wrote: > On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Lucas Beeler wrote: >> Pulling from Shotwell git master should be as easy as executing >> >> $ git clone git://yorba.org/shotwell >> >> on your system, and then building as usual with >> >> $ ./configure >> $ make >> # make install > > Hello. > I get the following segfault when running this version (git master) of Shotwell: > > Reading symbols from /home/camilo/Proyectos/shotwell/shotwell...done. > (gdb) run > Starting program: /home/camilo/Proyectos/shotwell/shotwell > [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] > Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1". > [New Thread 0x7fffe55c7700 (LWP 3938)] > > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > 0x00007ffff15ba95c in g_type_check_instance_is_a () > from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0 > (gdb) bt > #0 0x00007ffff15ba95c in g_type_check_instance_is_a () > from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0 > #1 0x00007ffff159e486 in g_object_unref () > from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0 > #2 0x00000000007b178d in resources_add_stock_icon_from_themed_icon ( > gicon=0xc9eef0, stock_id=0x96d98e "flag-page", modify=0, modify_target=0x0) > at /home/camilo/Proyectos/shotwell/src/Resources.vala:883 > #3 0x00000000007af60f in resources_init () > at /home/camilo/Proyectos/shotwell/src/Resources.vala:667 > #4 0x000000000067945b in _vala_main (args=0x7fffffffe418, args_length1=1) > at /home/camilo/Proyectos/shotwell/src/main.vala:405 > #5 0x000000000067985c in main (argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffe418) > at /home/camilo/Proyectos/shotwell/src/main.vala:317 > (gdb) > > Note I am not running the gnome shell. > Also, > > camilo at obsidiana:~/Proyectos/shotwell$ valac --version > Vala 0.19.0.9-3fd4 > > Regards, > Camilo > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From cpolymeris at gmail.com Wed Mar 27 02:36:07 2013 From: cpolymeris at gmail.com (Camilo Polymeris) Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 22:36:07 -0400 Subject: [Shotwell] Call for Testing: Shotwell 0.14 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:35 PM, Camilo Polymeris wrote: > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Lucas Beeler wrote: >> Hi Camilo, >> >>> I get the following segfault when >>> running this version (git master) >>> of Shotwell: >> >> What is your distro and system configuration? > Debian testing, awesome tiled window manager, Linux obsidiana > 3.2.0-3-amd64 #1 SMP Mon Jul 23 02:45:17 UTC 2012 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > I tried switching to the stable vala tarball release 0.20.0, but it > doesn't work. Neither does running shotwell from gnome. > >> Does the same problem >> occur when you try building and running the 0.14.0 stable tarball? > > Yes, the 0.14.0 tarball has the same issue. > BTW, this http://www.yorba.org/projects/shotwell/install-shotwell/ > points to an non existing version of the tarball. > >> Lucas >> >> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Camilo Polymeris wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Lucas Beeler wrote: >>>> Pulling from Shotwell git master should be as easy as executing >>>> >>>> $ git clone git://yorba.org/shotwell >>>> >>>> on your system, and then building as usual with >>>> >>>> $ ./configure >>>> $ make >>>> # make install >>> >>> Hello. >>> I get the following segfault when running this version (git master) of Shotwell: >>> >>> Reading symbols from /home/camilo/Proyectos/shotwell/shotwell...done. >>> (gdb) run >>> Starting program: /home/camilo/Proyectos/shotwell/shotwell >>> [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] >>> Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1". >>> [New Thread 0x7fffe55c7700 (LWP 3938)] >>> >>> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. >>> 0x00007ffff15ba95c in g_type_check_instance_is_a () >>> from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0 >>> (gdb) bt >>> #0 0x00007ffff15ba95c in g_type_check_instance_is_a () >>> from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0 >>> #1 0x00007ffff159e486 in g_object_unref () >>> from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0 >>> #2 0x00000000007b178d in resources_add_stock_icon_from_themed_icon ( >>> gicon=0xc9eef0, stock_id=0x96d98e "flag-page", modify=0, modify_target=0x0) >>> at /home/camilo/Proyectos/shotwell/src/Resources.vala:883 >>> #3 0x00000000007af60f in resources_init () >>> at /home/camilo/Proyectos/shotwell/src/Resources.vala:667 >>> #4 0x000000000067945b in _vala_main (args=0x7fffffffe418, args_length1=1) >>> at /home/camilo/Proyectos/shotwell/src/main.vala:405 >>> #5 0x000000000067985c in main (argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffe418) >>> at /home/camilo/Proyectos/shotwell/src/main.vala:317 >>> (gdb) >>> >>> Note I am not running the gnome shell. >>> Also, >>> >>> camilo at obsidiana:~/Proyectos/shotwell$ valac --version >>> Vala 0.19.0.9-3fd4 >>> >>> Regards, >>> Camilo >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Shotwell mailing list >>> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >>> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From sf.rique at gmail.com Wed Mar 27 04:10:54 2013 From: sf.rique at gmail.com (Henrique Santos Fernandes) Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 01:10:54 -0300 Subject: [Shotwell] Shotwell 0.14.0 Released In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello, I know from previuls realeases that the tags and stuff are save only on the image files, on videos files it all stays on shotwell database. The video metadata can now be save in the video file? So we can only backup the files and not the database or share this tags in other programs. Thanks! []'sf.rique On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Lucas Beeler wrote: > > I did have to add the gstreamer > > developers ppa (ppa:gstreamer- > > developers/ppa) in order to get > > gstreamer 1.0 for Precise. Was > > that the right thing to do? > > That was indeed the right thing to do! I'm calling it out here so that > other users take note. Thanks for mentioning this! > > Lucas > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 2:34 AM, Colin Law wrote: > > On 19 March 2013 23:20, Lucas Beeler wrote: > >> Hi Colin, > >> > >> Sorry about the broken Precise build. We just fixed it and our PPA > >> should be ready and waiting for you to upgrade Shotwell! > > > > Many thanks, all working now. I did have to add the gstreamer > > developers ppa (ppa:gstreamer-developers/ppa) in order to get > > gstreamer 1.0 for Precise. Was that the right thing to do? > > > > Colin > > > >> > >> Lucas > >> > >> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 8:17 AM, Colin Law > wrote: > >>> On 19 March 2013 13:51, Colin Law wrote: > >>>> On 19 March 2013 10:13, Colin Law wrote: > >>>>> On 19 March 2013 00:16, Clint Rogers wrote: > >>>>>> Dood evening, one and all, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> It's my privelege to announce the release of Shotwell 0.14; the > >>>>>> download, as well as installation instructions are available at > >>>>>> http://yorba.org/shotwell/install.html, and Ubuntu users may get it > >>>>>> from our PPA at https://launchpad.net/~yorba/+archive/ppa. > >>>>>> Among the many enhancements and fixes this release brings are: > >>>>> > >>>>> On 12.04 (32 bit), with the ppa enabled, sudo apt-get update && sudo > >>>>> apt-get dist-upgrade is not giving me shotwell 0.14. > >>> > >>> csola48 has pointed out there were build failures on the build for > Precise: > >>> Packages in ?yorba?: > >>> shotwell - 0.14.0-1~precise1 (changes file) lucas-yorba 17 > hours > >>> ago Published Precise Gnome There were *build > >>> failures. amd64 i386* > >>> > >>> Colin > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Shotwell mailing list > >>> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > >>> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > From cpolymeris at gmail.com Wed Mar 27 05:31:43 2013 From: cpolymeris at gmail.com (Camilo Polymeris) Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 01:31:43 -0400 Subject: [Shotwell] GSOC idea: Shotwell RAW developer integration Message-ID: Hello Shotwell users and developers, I have been using Shotwell for a while now. This, plus rawstudio and the GIMP compose my main photo workflow. The interaction between Shotwell and rawstudio is problematic, though, because the photo databases are separate. Shotwell gets confused when you delete pictures from within rawstudio, duplicate jpegs show up if you export from rawstudio, RAWs and jpegs are unlinked, etc. A few months ago I suggested a way to better integrate RAW development software like UFraw, rawstudio, raw therapee, and many others into Shotwell. In the mailing list thread[1] I described a solution very similar to what I gather is planned from reading Feature Request #3061 ("improve interaction with external RAW editors")[2]. This consists of --before calling the external developer software-- watching for changes to a "*_developed.jpeg" file, and passing this filename in the commandline, or similar. UFraw has had the capability to export to a set file for a while, using the --output command line option, and my patch to add that feature to rawstudio (called "client mode")[3] was accepted a while ago. Now, the Shotwell side is still missing. I played around with implementing it during last (austral) summer, not completing it, because I could not afford to spend too much time on it. Still, it helped get an idea of the dimensions of the problem. I understand, in the meanwhile, improvements of RAW handling have been made, which --due to that segfault that prevents me from running the latest version-- I haven't tested yet . My idea would be to develop this missing piece during this year's Google Summer of Code[4], maybe under the umbrella of Gnome. I have successfully taken part in this program during the past 2 years. I think the scope of this project is about right for the 12 weeks of GSoC. I would first focus on rawstudio and UFraw integration, and if time permits, add others later. If necessary, like I did with rawstudio, patches can be submitted to those projects, too. Any comments or suggestions are very welcome. Looking forward to contributing back to the project, Camilo [1] http://lists.yorba.org/pipermail/shotwell/2012-June/004067.html [2] http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/3061 [3] http://bugzilla.rawstudio.org/show_bug.cgi?id=556 [4] http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/homepage/google/gsoc2013 From arzitek at yahoo.com Wed Mar 27 12:39:04 2013 From: arzitek at yahoo.com (Luc More) Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 05:39:04 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Shotwell] Re : GSOC idea: Shotwell RAW developer integration Message-ID: <1364387944.11870.androidMobile@web122306.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Looks nice to have improved integration with the RAW workflows as you will see the greatly improved 0.14 does not address this yet.? Please consider adding Darktable to your list ;-) (not a Shotwell developer myself. Just a user. Luc Envoy? par Yahoo! Mail (sur Android) From lucas at yorba.org Wed Mar 27 20:07:23 2013 From: lucas at yorba.org (Lucas Beeler) Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 13:07:23 -0700 Subject: [Shotwell] Shotwell 0.14.0 Released In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Henrique, > The video metadata can now be save in the video file? Alas, there are no changes to video metadata handling in Shotwell 0.14, so Shotwell does not write any metadata changes to the video container files. This is something that we do want to do. About a year ago, it seemed virtually impossible, but now that GStreamer 1.0 has been released, we may be able to manipulate video data effectively. Stay tuned for this feature in a future release of Shotwell! Cheers, Lucas On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 9:10 PM, Henrique Santos Fernandes wrote: > Hello, > > I know from previuls realeases that the tags and stuff are save only on the > image files, on videos files it all stays on shotwell database. > > The video metadata can now be save in the video file? So we can only > backup the files and not the database or share this tags in other programs. > > Thanks! > > > []'sf.rique > > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Lucas Beeler wrote: > >> > I did have to add the gstreamer >> > developers ppa (ppa:gstreamer- >> > developers/ppa) in order to get >> > gstreamer 1.0 for Precise. Was >> > that the right thing to do? >> >> That was indeed the right thing to do! I'm calling it out here so that >> other users take note. Thanks for mentioning this! >> >> Lucas >> >> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 2:34 AM, Colin Law wrote: >> > On 19 March 2013 23:20, Lucas Beeler wrote: >> >> Hi Colin, >> >> >> >> Sorry about the broken Precise build. We just fixed it and our PPA >> >> should be ready and waiting for you to upgrade Shotwell! >> > >> > Many thanks, all working now. I did have to add the gstreamer >> > developers ppa (ppa:gstreamer-developers/ppa) in order to get >> > gstreamer 1.0 for Precise. Was that the right thing to do? >> > >> > Colin >> > >> >> >> >> Lucas >> >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 8:17 AM, Colin Law >> wrote: >> >>> On 19 March 2013 13:51, Colin Law wrote: >> >>>> On 19 March 2013 10:13, Colin Law wrote: >> >>>>> On 19 March 2013 00:16, Clint Rogers wrote: >> >>>>>> Dood evening, one and all, >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> It's my privelege to announce the release of Shotwell 0.14; the >> >>>>>> download, as well as installation instructions are available at >> >>>>>> http://yorba.org/shotwell/install.html, and Ubuntu users may get it >> >>>>>> from our PPA at https://launchpad.net/~yorba/+archive/ppa. >> >>>>>> Among the many enhancements and fixes this release brings are: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> On 12.04 (32 bit), with the ppa enabled, sudo apt-get update && sudo >> >>>>> apt-get dist-upgrade is not giving me shotwell 0.14. >> >>> >> >>> csola48 has pointed out there were build failures on the build for >> Precise: >> >>> Packages in ?yorba?: >> >>> shotwell - 0.14.0-1~precise1 (changes file) lucas-yorba 17 >> hours >> >>> ago Published Precise Gnome There were *build >> >>> failures. amd64 i386* >> >>> >> >>> Colin >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> Shotwell mailing list >> >>> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >> >>> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell >> _______________________________________________ >> Shotwell mailing list >> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell >> > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From lucas at yorba.org Wed Mar 27 20:13:25 2013 From: lucas at yorba.org (Lucas Beeler) Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 13:13:25 -0700 Subject: [Shotwell] Call for Testing: Shotwell 0.14 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Camilo, Sorry you're having trouble building and running Shotwell. I just looked at this stack trace you submitted eariler: > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > 0x00007ffff15ba95c in g_type_check_instance_is_a () > from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ > libgobject-2.0.so.0 > (gdb) bt > #0 0x00007ffff15ba95c in g_type_check_instance_is_a () > from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0 > #1 0x00007ffff159e486 in g_object_unref () > from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0 > #2 0x00000000007b178d in resources_add_stock_icon_from_themed_icon ( > gicon=0xc9eef0, stock_id=0x96d98e "flag-page", modify=0, modify_target=0x0) > at /home/camilo/Proyectos/shotwell/src/Resources.vala:883 > #3 0x00000000007af60f in resources_init () And it looks suspiciously like the stack trace we get when building Shotwell with versions of Vala that are too new; see this ticket for details: http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/6689 So, the best advice I can give you now is to downgrade your Vala compiler and try again! Cheers, Lucas On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Camilo Polymeris wrote: > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Lucas Beeler wrote: >> Hi Camilo, >> >>> I get the following segfault when >>> running this version (git master) >>> of Shotwell: >> >> What is your distro and system configuration? > Debian testing, awesome tiled window manager, Linux obsidiana > 3.2.0-3-amd64 #1 SMP Mon Jul 23 02:45:17 UTC 2012 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > I tried switching to the stable vala tarball release 0.20.0, but it > doesn't work. Neither does running shotwell from gnome. > >> Does the same problem >> occur when you try building and running the 0.14.0 stable tarball? > > Yes, the 0.14.0 tarball has the same issue. > BTW, this http://www.yorba.org/projects/shotwell/install-shotwell/ > points to an non existing version of the tarball. > >> Lucas >> >> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 8:03 AM, Camilo Polymeris wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Lucas Beeler wrote: >>>> Pulling from Shotwell git master should be as easy as executing >>>> >>>> $ git clone git://yorba.org/shotwell >>>> >>>> on your system, and then building as usual with >>>> >>>> $ ./configure >>>> $ make >>>> # make install >>> >>> Hello. >>> I get the following segfault when running this version (git master) of Shotwell: >>> >>> Reading symbols from /home/camilo/Proyectos/shotwell/shotwell...done. >>> (gdb) run >>> Starting program: /home/camilo/Proyectos/shotwell/shotwell >>> [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] >>> Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1". >>> [New Thread 0x7fffe55c7700 (LWP 3938)] >>> >>> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. >>> 0x00007ffff15ba95c in g_type_check_instance_is_a () >>> from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0 >>> (gdb) bt >>> #0 0x00007ffff15ba95c in g_type_check_instance_is_a () >>> from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0 >>> #1 0x00007ffff159e486 in g_object_unref () >>> from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0 >>> #2 0x00000000007b178d in resources_add_stock_icon_from_themed_icon ( >>> gicon=0xc9eef0, stock_id=0x96d98e "flag-page", modify=0, modify_target=0x0) >>> at /home/camilo/Proyectos/shotwell/src/Resources.vala:883 >>> #3 0x00000000007af60f in resources_init () >>> at /home/camilo/Proyectos/shotwell/src/Resources.vala:667 >>> #4 0x000000000067945b in _vala_main (args=0x7fffffffe418, args_length1=1) >>> at /home/camilo/Proyectos/shotwell/src/main.vala:405 >>> #5 0x000000000067985c in main (argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffe418) >>> at /home/camilo/Proyectos/shotwell/src/main.vala:317 >>> (gdb) >>> >>> Note I am not running the gnome shell. >>> Also, >>> >>> camilo at obsidiana:~/Proyectos/shotwell$ valac --version >>> Vala 0.19.0.9-3fd4 >>> >>> Regards, >>> Camilo >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Shotwell mailing list >>> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >>> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From arzitek at yahoo.com Wed Mar 27 23:39:24 2013 From: arzitek at yahoo.com (Luc More) Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 16:39:24 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Shotwell] Re : Re: Call for Testing: Shotwell 0.14 In-Reply-To: References: <1363944094.43063.androidMobile@web122305.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <514cb309.0499420a.4d71.13aa@mx.google.com> <1363988688.80836.YahooMailNeo@web122301.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <1364294004.91364.YahooMailNeo@web122301.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1364427564.82962.YahooMailNeo@web122302.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Lucas, I double-checked and this is not entirely true. ?Both fields (F2 & F3) get correctly written to metadata tags into the original JPEG when it was imported as a single JPEG. ?Apparently this is not the case when importing RAW+JPEG pairs. ?They get properly stored in the DB and displayed appropriately, and also they find their way out to exported JPEG (when exporting with the "export metadata" flag on). Luc ________________________________ De?: Lucas Beeler ??: Luc More Cc?: Jim Nelson ; "shotwell at lists.yorba.org" Envoy? le : Mardi 26 mars 2013 21h07 Objet?: Re: [Shotwell] Re : Re: Call for Testing: Shotwell 0.14 > Moreover, these metadata are no longer > written to the JPEG (not for RAW+JPEG > and not for simple JPEG). By "these metadata" do you mean the comment field? Lucas From mailing.lists at octgsoftware.com Thu Mar 28 18:51:34 2013 From: mailing.lists at octgsoftware.com (Jason Long) Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 13:51:34 -0500 Subject: [Shotwell] Shotwell 0.14 from fedora repostory Message-ID: <1364496694.9978.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> When will it be possible to install Shotwell 0.14 from Fedora 18 or rawhide repositories without having to compile anything? From lucas at yorba.org Thu Mar 28 20:00:49 2013 From: lucas at yorba.org (Lucas Beeler) Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 13:00:49 -0700 Subject: [Shotwell] Shotwell 0.14 from fedora repostory In-Reply-To: <1364496694.9978.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1364496694.9978.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: Hi Jason, > When will it be possible to install > Shotwell 0.14 from Fedora 18 or > rawhide repositories without having > to compile anything? We at Yorba can't answer this question because Red Hat and the Fedora community handle RPM packaging for Shotwell. Perhaps Matthias Clasen or one of the other Red Hat-affiliated subscribers to this list could chime in? Lucas On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Jason Long wrote: > When will it be possible to install Shotwell 0.14 from Fedora 18 or > rawhide repositories without having to compile anything? > > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From lucas at yorba.org Thu Mar 28 20:44:02 2013 From: lucas at yorba.org (Lucas Beeler) Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 13:44:02 -0700 Subject: [Shotwell] Re : Re: Call for Testing: Shotwell 0.14 In-Reply-To: <1364427564.82962.YahooMailNeo@web122302.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> References: <1363944094.43063.androidMobile@web122305.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <514cb309.0499420a.4d71.13aa@mx.google.com> <1363988688.80836.YahooMailNeo@web122301.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <1364294004.91364.YahooMailNeo@web122301.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <1364427564.82962.YahooMailNeo@web122302.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Hi Luc, Your explanation of Shotwell's behavior: > I double-checked and this is not entirely true. > Both fields (F2 & F3) get correctly written to > metadata tags into the original JPEG when it > was imported as a single JPEG. Apparently > this is not the case when importing RAW+JPEG > pairs. They get properly stored in the DB and > displayed appropriately, and also they find their > way out to exported JPEG (when exporting with > the "export metadata" flag on). is entirely correct. Right now, Shotwell can only write metadata to JPEG files. Writing to RAW files is a definite possibility in an upcoming release and is ticketed here: http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/2622. Cheers, Lucas On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Luc More wrote: > Lucas, > > I double-checked and this is not entirely true. Both fields (F2 & F3) get > correctly written to metadata tags into the original JPEG when it was > imported as a single JPEG. Apparently this is not the case when importing > RAW+JPEG pairs. They get properly stored in the DB and displayed > appropriately, and also they find their way out to exported JPEG (when > exporting with the "export metadata" flag on). > > Luc > > ________________________________ > De : Lucas Beeler > ? : Luc More > Cc : Jim Nelson ; "shotwell at lists.yorba.org" > > Envoy? le : Mardi 26 mars 2013 21h07 > > Objet : Re: [Shotwell] Re : Re: Call for Testing: Shotwell 0.14 > >> Moreover, these metadata are no longer >> written to the JPEG (not for RAW+JPEG >> and not for simple JPEG). > > By "these metadata" do you mean the comment field? > > Lucas > From rishi.is at lostca.se Fri Mar 29 23:10:21 2013 From: rishi.is at lostca.se (Debarshi Ray) Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 23:10:21 +0000 Subject: [Shotwell] Shotwell 0.14 from fedora repostory In-Reply-To: <1364496694.9978.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1364496694.9978.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <20130329231021.GE76448@arati.lostca.se> > When will it be possible to install Shotwell 0.14 from Fedora 18 or > rawhide repositories without having to compile anything? It is already available for F19 and above: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=9012 So, yes, it is available for Rawhide. Cheers, Debarshi -- If computers are going to revolutionize education, then steam engines and cars and electricity would have done it too. -- Arjun Shankar -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 834 bytes Desc: not available URL: