From maxxer at ufficyo.com Mon Oct 1 05:43:55 2012 From: maxxer at ufficyo.com (Lorenzo Milesi) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 07:43:55 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [Shotwell] [PATCH] Fix spelling errors (some user facing, most in source code comments) In-Reply-To: <1348930674-22368-1-git-send-email-martin@minimum.se> Message-ID: <1412794135.58040.1349070235191.JavaMail.root@yetopen.it> > Oggetto: [Shotwell] [PATCH] Fix spelling errors (some user facing, most in source code comments) you'd better open a ticket and attach the patch there, or it will get lost on the mailing list http://redmine.yorba.org -- Lorenzo Milesi - lorenzo.milesi at yetopen.it GPG/PGP Key-Id: 0xE704E230 - http://keyserver.linux.it From farrukh.najm at gmail.com Mon Oct 1 17:34:41 2012 From: farrukh.najm at gmail.com (Farrukh Najmi) Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 13:34:41 -0400 Subject: [Shotwell] How to generate date-based events from No Event photos In-Reply-To: <5068B62C.4020306@gmail.com> References: <5068B62C.4020306@gmail.com> Message-ID: <5069D431.7070502@gmail.com> I found through experimenting that all I had to do was to select my photos under "No Event" and do Events / New Event action (or CTRL-N) and it would create a new event using the date metadata. Thanks again for a great tool. On 09/30/2012 05:14 PM, Farrukh Najmi wrote: > > Hi Guys, > > Something I did along the way marked many of my photos under "No > Event" even though they have date metadata showing in lower left of > screen when I click on a picture in the browse view. > > I also note that I have some years with large gaps in my photo library. > > I am assuming that somehow the date-based events for some years got > messed up. > > Is there some way that I can automatically generate date based events > for such pictures? > > Thanks for your help. From jim at yorba.org Mon Oct 1 17:53:51 2012 From: jim at yorba.org (Jim Nelson) Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 17:46:51 -0007 Subject: [Shotwell] [PATCH] Fix spelling errors (some user facing, most in source code comments) In-Reply-To: <1412794135.58040.1349070235191.JavaMail.root@yetopen.it> References: <1412794135.58040.1349070235191.JavaMail.root@yetopen.it> Message-ID: <5069d8a8.4949420a.09d4.ffffbacb@mx.google.com> Alternately, you could send the patch to the Shotwell team at shotwell at yorba.org. -- Jim On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 10:43 PM, Lorenzo Milesi wrote: > Oggetto: [Shotwell] [PATCH] Fix spelling errors (some user facing, most in source code comments) you'd better open a ticket and attach the patch there, or it will get lost on the mailing list http://redmine.yorba.org -- Lorenzo Milesi - lorenzo.milesi at yetopen.it GPG/PGP Key-Id: 0xE704E230 - http://keyserver.linux.it _______________________________________________ Shotwell mailing list Shotwell at lists.yorba.org http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From maxxer at ufficyo.com Mon Oct 1 18:11:15 2012 From: maxxer at ufficyo.com (Lorenzo Milesi) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 20:11:15 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [Shotwell] f-spot import hangs In-Reply-To: <2108123525.10789.1348721688769.JavaMail.root@yetopen.it> Message-ID: <1040999307.72020.1349115075215.JavaMail.root@yetopen.it> updating more interesting stack calls. no ideas? :( #1 type_lookup_iface_vtable_I (vtable_ptr=, iface_node=0x8569288, node=0x84aebc0) at /build/buildd/glib2.0-2.32.3/./gobject/gtype.c:619 #2 type_lookup_iface_vtable_I (vtable_ptr=, iface_node=0x8569288, node=0x84aebc0) at /build/buildd/glib2.0-2.32.3/./gobject/gtype.c:3106 #3 g_type_interface_peek (instance_class=0x85386c0, iface_type=139891336) at /build/buildd/glib2.0-2.32.3/./gobject/gtype.c:3119 #4 0xb7549ef1 in gee_collection_get_size () from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgee.so.2 #5 0x082687cb in batch_import_display_imported_timer (self=0xdeb2170) at /build/buildd/shotwell-0.13.0/src/BatchImport.vala:1130 #6 _batch_import_display_imported_timer_gsource_func (self=0xdeb2170) at BatchImport.c:4805 #7 0xb72dda7f in g_timeout_dispatch (source=0xdeb2638, callback=0x8268740 <_batch_import_display_imported_timer_gsource_func>, user_data=0xdeb2170) at /build/buildd/glib2.0-2.32.3/./glib/gmain.c:3882 #8 0xb72dcd86 in g_main_dispatch (context=0x8477880) at /build/buildd/glib2.0-2.32.3/./glib/gmain.c:2539 #9 g_main_context_dispatch (context=0x8477880) at /build/buildd/glib2.0-2.32.3/./glib/gmain.c:3075 -- Lorenzo Milesi - lorenzo.milesi at yetopen.it GPG/PGP Key-Id: 0xE704E230 - http://keyserver.linux.it From jim at yorba.org Mon Oct 1 18:17:41 2012 From: jim at yorba.org (Jim Nelson) Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 18:10:41 -0007 Subject: [Shotwell] Since 0.13 Filter won work anymore - Ubuntu x86_64 In-Reply-To: References: <5067EDC2.7070604@gmx.de>,<50680B32.9090502@gmx.de> <50680B32.9090502@gmx.de> Message-ID: <5069de3e.e987440a.49bb.ffffd222@mx.google.com> Hi Marc, I don't see anything like what you're describing. ?As Eric asked, are you using the Search Bar (F8) to change your filters? ?Do you have any other filters active that might be interfering with what you see? ?If you press F8 a couple of times, it will clear the filters to their default state. -- Jim On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Eric L wrote: I also have this problem. But discovered that if you can fix the problem if you View - Search Bar (or F8). -Ericusing 0.13.0+trunk Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 11:04:50 +0200 From: schuetz.marc at gmx.de To: shotwell at lists.yorba.org Subject: Re: [Shotwell] Since 0.13 Filter won work anymore - Ubuntu x86_64 Hi all again, tested a little bit more around. All Filter seems to work !!ONLY!! if you are on the Library. If I'm on a event , no Filter will work as discribed before. They will be ignored. Even if there are pictures with *,**,** or anything else or not. Cheers Marc Am 30.09.2012 08:59, schrieb Marc: > Hi, > > Before upgrading to 0.13 I had this problem: > > Shotwell starts and the default filter is set to "All photos" (STRG+0) > But shotwell shows "All photos + Rejected" and so I had to change after > every start of shotwell to another filter and back. > > I thought with 0.13 this would be better, But now the change of ANY > filter doesn show an effect and it displays only > "All photos + Rejected" > > Can someone confirm this? > > Thanks and Kind Regards > Marc > > > > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > _______________________________________________ Shotwell mailing list Shotwell at lists.yorba.org http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell _______________________________________________ Shotwell mailing list Shotwell at lists.yorba.org http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From onefiftyfour at hotmail.com Mon Oct 1 19:41:27 2012 From: onefiftyfour at hotmail.com (Eric L) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 14:41:27 -0500 Subject: [Shotwell] Since 0.13 Filter won work anymore - Ubuntu x86_64 In-Reply-To: <5069de3e.e987440a.49bb.ffffd222@mx.google.com> References: <5067EDC2.7070604@gmx.de>, <50680B32.9090502@gmx.de>, <50680B32.9090502@gmx.de> , <5069de3e.e987440a.49bb.ffffd222@mx.google.com> Message-ID: There is definitely a bug here. And it is more complicated than I thought. to reproduce: Start shotwell. The following steps need to be done right after shotwell is started. The bug disappears if you've turned the search bar on at any point.Hightlight an Event (search bar should not be visible)From the View menu, Filter Photos on 3 starsAt this point the search bar is still not visible and all photos in this event are visible.You can click on Library now. The library IS filtered on 3 stars. And the search bar is not visible.Click on the Event again. Still All photos are showing until you hit F8 or View search bar. After you view the search bar, this problem disappears until you restart shotwell. At some point while I was testing I had a condition where All Photos was selected as the filter setting through the View menu, but the Event was stuck on 3 star filtering. But I could not reproduce this. -Eric Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 18:10:41 -0007 From: jim at yorba.org Subject: Re: [Shotwell] Since 0.13 Filter won work anymore - Ubuntu x86_64 To: onefiftyfour at hotmail.com CC: shotwell at lists.yorba.org Hi Marc, I don't see anything like what you're describing. As Eric asked, are you using the Search Bar (F8) to change your filters? Do you have any other filters active that might be interfering with what you see? If you press F8 a couple of times, it will clear the filters to their default state. -- Jim On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Eric L wrote: I also have this problem. But discovered that if you can fix the problem if you View - Search Bar (or F8). -Ericusing 0.13.0+trunk Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 11:04:50 +0200 From: schuetz.marc at gmx.de To: shotwell at lists.yorba.org Subject: Re: [Shotwell] Since 0.13 Filter won work anymore - Ubuntu x86_64 Hi all again, tested a little bit more around. All Filter seems to work !!ONLY!! if you are on the Library. If I'm on a event , no Filter will work as discribed before. They will be ignored. Even if there are pictures with *,**,** or anything else or not. Cheers Marc Am 30.09.2012 08:59, schrieb Marc: > Hi, > > Before upgrading to 0.13 I had this problem: > > Shotwell starts and the default filter is set to "All photos" (STRG+0) > But shotwell shows "All photos + Rejected" and so I had to change after > every start of shotwell to another filter and back. > > I thought with 0.13 this would be better, But now the change of ANY > filter doesn show an effect and it displays only > "All photos + Rejected" > > Can someone confirm this? > > Thanks and Kind Regards > Marc > > > > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > _______________________________________________ Shotwell mailing list Shotwell at lists.yorba.org http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell _______________________________________________ Shotwell mailing list Shotwell at lists.yorba.org http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From onefiftyfour at hotmail.com Mon Oct 1 19:44:33 2012 From: onefiftyfour at hotmail.com (Eric L) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 14:44:33 -0500 Subject: [Shotwell] Since 0.13 Filter won work anymore - Ubuntu x86_64 In-Reply-To: References: <5067EDC2.7070604@gmx.de>, <50680B32.9090502@gmx.de>, , <50680B32.9090502@gmx.de>, , , <5069de3e.e987440a.49bb.ffffd222@mx.google.com>, Message-ID: The formatting of my email was lost. Here are those steps: -Start shotwell. The following steps need to be done right after shotwell is started. The bug disappears if you've turned the search bar on at any point. -Hightlight an Event (search bar should not be visible) -From the View menu, Filter Photos on 3 stars -At this point the search bar is still not visible and all photos in this event are visible. -You can click on Library now. The library IS filtered on 3 stars. And the search bar is not visible. -Click on the Event again. Still All photos are showing until you hit F8 or View search bar. > From: onefiftyfour at hotmail.com > To: shotwell at lists.yorba.org > Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 14:41:27 -0500 > Subject: Re: [Shotwell] Since 0.13 Filter won work anymore - Ubuntu x86_64 > > > There is definitely a bug here. And it is more complicated than I thought. > to reproduce: > Start shotwell. The following steps need to be done right after shotwell is started. The bug disappears if you've turned the search bar on at any point.Hightlight an Event (search bar should not be visible)From the View menu, Filter Photos on 3 starsAt this point the search bar is still not visible and all photos in this event are visible.You can click on Library now. The library IS filtered on 3 stars. And the search bar is not visible.Click on the Event again. Still All photos are showing until you hit F8 or View search bar. > After you view the search bar, this problem disappears until you restart shotwell. > At some point while I was testing I had a condition where All Photos was selected as the filter setting through the View menu, but the Event was stuck on 3 star filtering. But I could not reproduce this. > -Eric > > Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 18:10:41 -0007 > From: jim at yorba.org > Subject: Re: [Shotwell] Since 0.13 Filter won work anymore - Ubuntu x86_64 > To: onefiftyfour at hotmail.com > CC: shotwell at lists.yorba.org > > Hi Marc, > I don't see anything like what you're describing. As Eric asked, are you using the Search Bar (F8) to change your filters? Do you have any other filters active that might be interfering with what you see? If you press F8 a couple of times, it will clear the filters to their default state. > -- Jim > > > On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Eric L wrote: > > > > I also have this problem. But discovered that if you can fix the problem if you View - Search Bar (or F8). > > > > -Ericusing 0.13.0+trunk > > Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 11:04:50 +0200 > > From: schuetz.marc at gmx.de > > To: shotwell at lists.yorba.org > > Subject: Re: [Shotwell] Since 0.13 Filter won work anymore - Ubuntu x86_64 > > > > Hi all again, > > > > tested a little bit more around. > > All Filter seems to work !!ONLY!! if you are on the Library. > > If I'm on a event , no Filter will work as discribed before. > > They will be ignored. > > > > Even if there are pictures with *,**,** or anything else or not. > > > > Cheers > > Marc > > > > Am 30.09.2012 08:59, schrieb Marc: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Before upgrading to 0.13 I had this problem: > > > > > > Shotwell starts and the default filter is set to "All photos" (STRG+0) > > > But shotwell shows "All photos + Rejected" and so I had to change after > > > every start of shotwell to another filter and back. > > > > > > I thought with 0.13 this would be better, But now the change of ANY > > > filter doesn show an effect and it displays only > > > "All photos + Rejected" > > > > > > Can someone confirm this? > > > > > > Thanks and Kind Regards > > > Marc > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Shotwell mailing list > > > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > > > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Shotwell mailing list > > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > > _______________________________________________ > > Shotwell mailing list > > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > > > > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From schuetz.marc at gmx.de Mon Oct 1 19:59:35 2012 From: schuetz.marc at gmx.de (Marc) Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 21:59:35 +0200 Subject: [Shotwell] Since 0.13 Filter won work anymore - Ubuntu x86_64 In-Reply-To: References: <5067EDC2.7070604@gmx.de>, <50680B32.9090502@gmx.de>, , <50680B32.9090502@gmx.de>, , , <5069de3e.e987440a.49bb.ffffd222@mx.google.com>, Message-ID: <5069F627.9060204@gmx.de> Thanks Eric for the Tip with F8 / Search Bar. IT works fine with this, but definitly as discribed by Eric and Jim it is a Bug that no Filter will work. @Jim: This Bug appears when you choose the Filter from the Menu or with STRG+x Am 01.10.2012 21:44, schrieb Eric L: > > The formatting of my email was lost. > Here are those steps: > -Start shotwell. The following steps need to be done right after shotwell is started. The bug disappears if you've turned the search bar on at any point. > > -Hightlight an Event (search bar should not be visible) > > -From the View menu, Filter Photos on 3 stars > > -At this point the search bar is still not visible and all photos in this event are visible. > > -You can click on Library now. The library IS filtered on 3 stars. And the search bar is not visible. > > -Click on the Event again. Still All photos are showing until you hit F8 or View search bar. > > >> From: onefiftyfour at hotmail.com >> To: shotwell at lists.yorba.org >> Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 14:41:27 -0500 >> Subject: Re: [Shotwell] Since 0.13 Filter won work anymore - Ubuntu x86_64 >> >> >> There is definitely a bug here. And it is more complicated than I thought. >> to reproduce: >> Start shotwell. The following steps need to be done right after shotwell is started. The bug disappears if you've turned the search bar on at any point.Hightlight an Event (search bar should not be visible)From the View menu, Filter Photos on 3 starsAt this point the search bar is still not visible and all photos in this event are visible.You can click on Library now. The library IS filtered on 3 stars. And the search bar is not visible.Click on the Event again. Still All photos are showing until you hit F8 or View search bar. >> After you view the search bar, this problem disappears until you restart shotwell. >> At some point while I was testing I had a condition where All Photos was selected as the filter setting through the View menu, but the Event was stuck on 3 star filtering. But I could not reproduce this. >> -Eric >> >> Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 18:10:41 -0007 >> From: jim at yorba.org >> Subject: Re: [Shotwell] Since 0.13 Filter won work anymore - Ubuntu x86_64 >> To: onefiftyfour at hotmail.com >> CC: shotwell at lists.yorba.org >> >> Hi Marc, >> I don't see anything like what you're describing. As Eric asked, are you using the Search Bar (F8) to change your filters? Do you have any other filters active that might be interfering with what you see? If you press F8 a couple of times, it will clear the filters to their default state. >> -- Jim >> >> >> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Eric L wrote: >> >> >> >> I also have this problem. But discovered that if you can fix the problem if you View - Search Bar (or F8). >> >> >> >> -Ericusing 0.13.0+trunk >> >> Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 11:04:50 +0200 >> >> From: schuetz.marc at gmx.de >> >> To: shotwell at lists.yorba.org >> >> Subject: Re: [Shotwell] Since 0.13 Filter won work anymore - Ubuntu x86_64 >> >> >> >> Hi all again, >> >> >> >> tested a little bit more around. >> >> All Filter seems to work !!ONLY!! if you are on the Library. >> >> If I'm on a event , no Filter will work as discribed before. >> >> They will be ignored. >> >> >> >> Even if there are pictures with *,**,** or anything else or not. >> >> >> >> Cheers >> >> Marc >> >> >> >> Am 30.09.2012 08:59, schrieb Marc: >> >>> Hi, >> >>> >> >>> Before upgrading to 0.13 I had this problem: >> >>> >> >>> Shotwell starts and the default filter is set to "All photos" (STRG+0) >> >>> But shotwell shows "All photos + Rejected" and so I had to change after >> >>> every start of shotwell to another filter and back. >> >>> >> >>> I thought with 0.13 this would be better, But now the change of ANY >> >>> filter doesn show an effect and it displays only >> >>> "All photos + Rejected" >> >>> >> >>> Can someone confirm this? >> >>> >> >>> Thanks and Kind Regards >> >>> Marc >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> Shotwell mailing list >> >>> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >> >>> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Shotwell mailing list >> >> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >> >> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Shotwell mailing list >> >> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >> >> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Shotwell mailing list >> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 551 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From lucas at yorba.org Mon Oct 1 20:59:17 2012 From: lucas at yorba.org (Lucas Beeler) Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 13:59:17 -0700 Subject: [Shotwell] Since 0.13 Filter won work anymore - Ubuntu x86_64 In-Reply-To: <5069F627.9060204@gmx.de> References: <5067EDC2.7070604@gmx.de> <50680B32.9090502@gmx.de> <5069de3e.e987440a.49bb.ffffd222@mx.google.com> <5069F627.9060204@gmx.de> Message-ID: This is indeed a bug. I've opened a ticket for it here (http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/5912) in our bug tracking system. Thanks for bringing it to our attention! Cheers, Lucas On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Marc wrote: > Thanks Eric for the Tip with F8 / Search Bar. > > IT works fine with this, but definitly as discribed by Eric and Jim it > is a Bug that no Filter will work. > > @Jim: This Bug appears when you choose the Filter from the Menu or with > STRG+x > > > > Am 01.10.2012 21:44, schrieb Eric L: >> >> The formatting of my email was lost. >> Here are those steps: >> -Start shotwell. The following steps need to be done right after shotwell is started. The bug disappears if you've turned the search bar on at any point. >> >> -Hightlight an Event (search bar should not be visible) >> >> -From the View menu, Filter Photos on 3 stars >> >> -At this point the search bar is still not visible and all photos in this event are visible. >> >> -You can click on Library now. The library IS filtered on 3 stars. And the search bar is not visible. >> >> -Click on the Event again. Still All photos are showing until you hit F8 or View search bar. >> >> >>> From: onefiftyfour at hotmail.com >>> To: shotwell at lists.yorba.org >>> Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 14:41:27 -0500 >>> Subject: Re: [Shotwell] Since 0.13 Filter won work anymore - Ubuntu x86_64 >>> >>> >>> There is definitely a bug here. And it is more complicated than I thought. >>> to reproduce: >>> Start shotwell. The following steps need to be done right after shotwell is started. The bug disappears if you've turned the search bar on at any point.Hightlight an Event (search bar should not be visible)From the View menu, Filter Photos on 3 starsAt this point the search bar is still not visible and all photos in this event are visible.You can click on Library now. The library IS filtered on 3 stars. And the search bar is not visible.Click on the Event again. Still All photos are showing until you hit F8 or View search bar. >>> After you view the search bar, this problem disappears until you restart shotwell. >>> At some point while I was testing I had a condition where All Photos was selected as the filter setting through the View menu, but the Event was stuck on 3 star filtering. But I could not reproduce this. >>> -Eric >>> >>> Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 18:10:41 -0007 >>> From: jim at yorba.org >>> Subject: Re: [Shotwell] Since 0.13 Filter won work anymore - Ubuntu x86_64 >>> To: onefiftyfour at hotmail.com >>> CC: shotwell at lists.yorba.org >>> >>> Hi Marc, >>> I don't see anything like what you're describing. As Eric asked, are you using the Search Bar (F8) to change your filters? Do you have any other filters active that might be interfering with what you see? If you press F8 a couple of times, it will clear the filters to their default state. >>> -- Jim >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Eric L wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> I also have this problem. But discovered that if you can fix the problem if you View - Search Bar (or F8). >>> >>> >>> >>> -Ericusing 0.13.0+trunk >>> >>> Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 11:04:50 +0200 >>> >>> From: schuetz.marc at gmx.de >>> >>> To: shotwell at lists.yorba.org >>> >>> Subject: Re: [Shotwell] Since 0.13 Filter won work anymore - Ubuntu x86_64 >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi all again, >>> >>> >>> >>> tested a little bit more around. >>> >>> All Filter seems to work !!ONLY!! if you are on the Library. >>> >>> If I'm on a event , no Filter will work as discribed before. >>> >>> They will be ignored. >>> >>> >>> >>> Even if there are pictures with *,**,** or anything else or not. >>> >>> >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> Marc >>> >>> >>> >>> Am 30.09.2012 08:59, schrieb Marc: >>> >>>> Hi, >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Before upgrading to 0.13 I had this problem: >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Shotwell starts and the default filter is set to "All photos" (STRG+0) >>> >>>> But shotwell shows "All photos + Rejected" and so I had to change after >>> >>>> every start of shotwell to another filter and back. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> I thought with 0.13 this would be better, But now the change of ANY >>> >>>> filter doesn show an effect and it displays only >>> >>>> "All photos + Rejected" >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Can someone confirm this? >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Thanks and Kind Regards >>> >>>> Marc >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>>> Shotwell mailing list >>> >>>> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >>> >>>> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> Shotwell mailing list >>> >>> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >>> >>> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> Shotwell mailing list >>> >>> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >>> >>> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Shotwell mailing list >>> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >>> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Shotwell mailing list >> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > From brunogirin at gmail.com Tue Oct 2 15:47:29 2012 From: brunogirin at gmail.com (Bruno Girin) Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 16:47:29 +0100 Subject: [Shotwell] f-spot import hangs In-Reply-To: <1040999307.72020.1349115075215.JavaMail.root@yetopen.it> References: <1040999307.72020.1349115075215.JavaMail.root@yetopen.it> Message-ID: <506B0C91.6010706@gmail.com> On 01/10/12 19:11, Lorenzo Milesi wrote: > updating more interesting stack calls. no ideas? :( > > #1 type_lookup_iface_vtable_I (vtable_ptr=, > iface_node=0x8569288, node=0x84aebc0) > at /build/buildd/glib2.0-2.32.3/./gobject/gtype.c:619 > #2 type_lookup_iface_vtable_I (vtable_ptr=, > iface_node=0x8569288, node=0x84aebc0) > at /build/buildd/glib2.0-2.32.3/./gobject/gtype.c:3106 > #3 g_type_interface_peek (instance_class=0x85386c0, iface_type=139891336) > at /build/buildd/glib2.0-2.32.3/./gobject/gtype.c:3119 > #4 0xb7549ef1 in gee_collection_get_size () > from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgee.so.2 > #5 0x082687cb in batch_import_display_imported_timer (self=0xdeb2170) > at /build/buildd/shotwell-0.13.0/src/BatchImport.vala:1130 > #6 _batch_import_display_imported_timer_gsource_func (self=0xdeb2170) > at BatchImport.c:4805 > #7 0xb72dda7f in g_timeout_dispatch (source=0xdeb2638, > callback=0x8268740 <_batch_import_display_imported_timer_gsource_func>, > user_data=0xdeb2170) at /build/buildd/glib2.0-2.32.3/./glib/gmain.c:3882 > #8 0xb72dcd86 in g_main_dispatch (context=0x8477880) > at /build/buildd/glib2.0-2.32.3/./glib/gmain.c:2539 > #9 g_main_context_dispatch (context=0x8477880) > at /build/buildd/glib2.0-2.32.3/./glib/gmain.c:3075 Lorenzo, The interesting bit here is frame #5, inside BatchImport.vala. If you could switch to that frame and step through the code to understand what it does, that would help a lot! At each step, make sure you print out the values of the variables used in the code. The gdb example I mentioned in a previous email explains how to do that and if you have questions, I'm happy to guide you to understand what really happens. Cheers, Bruno From joseph.bylund at gmail.com Wed Oct 3 19:29:05 2012 From: joseph.bylund at gmail.com (Joseph Bylund) Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 15:29:05 -0400 Subject: [Shotwell] remember copy/import in place choice on import dialogue Message-ID: <506C9201.1060507@gmail.com> Didn't find a feature request for this, but I've been known to use the wrong search terms before, so asking the list: Some users (myself included) always select the same option for "import in place" or "copy photos" in the import dialogue. Imports could be made slightly less complicated for these users by including a checkbox to "remember this choice next time". -Joe From jim at yorba.org Wed Oct 3 20:48:56 2012 From: jim at yorba.org (Jim Nelson) Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 20:41:56 -0007 Subject: [Shotwell] remember copy/import in place choice on import dialogue In-Reply-To: <506C9201.1060507@gmail.com> References: <506C9201.1060507@gmail.com> Message-ID: <506ca4ae.48cb440a.6a24.1fa6@mx.google.com> My only concern here is that if we do offer that checkbox, how would the user be able to un-check it? ?I assume that your suggestion is not to show the dialog box again if it's checked. -- Jim On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Joseph Bylund wrote: Didn't find a feature request for this, but I've been known to use the wrong search terms before, so asking the list: Some users (myself included) always select the same option for "import in place" or "copy photos" in the import dialogue. Imports could be made slightly less complicated for these users by including a checkbox to "remember this choice next time". -Joe _______________________________________________ Shotwell mailing list Shotwell at lists.yorba.org http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From joseph.bylund at gmail.com Wed Oct 3 21:11:16 2012 From: joseph.bylund at gmail.com (Joseph Bylund) Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 17:11:16 -0400 Subject: [Shotwell] remember copy/import in place choice on import dialogue In-Reply-To: <506ca4ae.48cb440a.6a24.1fa6@mx.google.com> References: <506C9201.1060507@gmail.com> <506ca4ae.48cb440a.6a24.1fa6@mx.google.com> Message-ID: <506CA9F4.7030107@gmail.com> My suggestion was to not show the box again next time. Maybe under edit->preferences->library tab->importing add a radio button or drop down with three options, "in place", "copy" and "ask me every time"? The biggest issue I could see is that doing a one-off import then becomes slightly annoying for users that usually, but not always, do one of the two. A possible solution to that would be having file->import from folder expand to the "import in place" and "copy files" options, if import from folder remained click-able then it could perform the default action: file ??? import_from_app ??? import_from_folder ??? copy_files ??? in_place -Joe On 10/03/2012 04:48 PM, Jim Nelson wrote: > My only concern here is that if we do offer that checkbox, how would > the user be able to un-check it? I assume that your suggestion is not > to show the dialog box again if it's checked. > > -- Jim > > On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Joseph Bylund > wrote: >> Didn't find a feature request for this, but I've been known to use >> the wrong search terms before, so asking the list: >> >> Some users (myself included) always select the same option for >> "import in place" or "copy photos" in the import dialogue. Imports >> could be made slightly less complicated for these users by including >> a checkbox to "remember this choice next time". >> >> -Joe >> _______________________________________________ >> Shotwell mailing list >> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > From onefiftyfour at hotmail.com Thu Oct 4 23:07:07 2012 From: onefiftyfour at hotmail.com (Eric L) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 18:07:07 -0500 Subject: [Shotwell] Since 0.13 Filter won work anymore - Ubuntu x86_64 In-Reply-To: References: <5067EDC2.7070604@gmx.de> <50680B32.9090502@gmx.de>, , <5069de3e.e987440a.49bb.ffffd222@mx.google.com>, , , <5069F627.9060204@gmx.de>, Message-ID: I've noticed you've applied a patch for this, but it is still not perfect. -apply a 3 star filter while in EventA - good-click on EventB - good. filter is applied here.-hit F8 once - good. filter is back to All Photos.-hit F8 again - good. turns off the search bar.-click on EventA - bad. 3 star filter is applied and search bar is turned off. -eric PS. I love shotwell. Thanks! > Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 13:59:17 -0700 > From: lucas at yorba.org > To: schuetz.marc at gmx.de > CC: shotwell at lists.yorba.org > Subject: Re: [Shotwell] Since 0.13 Filter won work anymore - Ubuntu x86_64 > > This is indeed a bug. I've opened a ticket for it here > (http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/5912) in our bug tracking system. > Thanks for bringing it to our attention! > > Cheers, > Lucas > > On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Marc wrote: > > Thanks Eric for the Tip with F8 / Search Bar. > > > > IT works fine with this, but definitly as discribed by Eric and Jim it > > is a Bug that no Filter will work. > > > > @Jim: This Bug appears when you choose the Filter from the Menu or with > > STRG+x > > > > > > > > Am 01.10.2012 21:44, schrieb Eric L: > >> > >> The formatting of my email was lost. > >> Here are those steps: > >> -Start shotwell. The following steps need to be done right after shotwell is started. The bug disappears if you've turned the search bar on at any point. > >> > >> -Hightlight an Event (search bar should not be visible) > >> > >> -From the View menu, Filter Photos on 3 stars > >> > >> -At this point the search bar is still not visible and all photos in this event are visible. > >> > >> -You can click on Library now. The library IS filtered on 3 stars. And the search bar is not visible. > >> > >> -Click on the Event again. Still All photos are showing until you hit F8 or View search bar. > >> > >> > >>> From: onefiftyfour at hotmail.com > >>> To: shotwell at lists.yorba.org > >>> Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 14:41:27 -0500 > >>> Subject: Re: [Shotwell] Since 0.13 Filter won work anymore - Ubuntu x86_64 > >>> > >>> > >>> There is definitely a bug here. And it is more complicated than I thought. > >>> to reproduce: > >>> Start shotwell. The following steps need to be done right after shotwell is started. The bug disappears if you've turned the search bar on at any point.Hightlight an Event (search bar should not be visible)From the View menu, Filter Photos on 3 starsAt this point the search bar is still not visible and all photos in this event are visible.You can click on Library now. The library IS filtered on 3 stars. And the search bar is not visible.Click on the Event again. Still All photos are showing until you hit F8 or View search bar. > >>> After you view the search bar, this problem disappears until you restart shotwell. > >>> At some point while I was testing I had a condition where All Photos was selected as the filter setting through the View menu, but the Event was stuck on 3 star filtering. But I could not reproduce this. > >>> -Eric > >>> > >>> Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 18:10:41 -0007 > >>> From: jim at yorba.org > >>> Subject: Re: [Shotwell] Since 0.13 Filter won work anymore - Ubuntu x86_64 > >>> To: onefiftyfour at hotmail.com > >>> CC: shotwell at lists.yorba.org > >>> > >>> Hi Marc, > >>> I don't see anything like what you're describing. As Eric asked, are you using the Search Bar (F8) to change your filters? Do you have any other filters active that might be interfering with what you see? If you press F8 a couple of times, it will clear the filters to their default state. > >>> -- Jim > >>> > >>> > >>> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Eric L wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> I also have this problem. But discovered that if you can fix the problem if you View - Search Bar (or F8). > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -Ericusing 0.13.0+trunk > >>> > >>> Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 11:04:50 +0200 > >>> > >>> From: schuetz.marc at gmx.de > >>> > >>> To: shotwell at lists.yorba.org > >>> > >>> Subject: Re: [Shotwell] Since 0.13 Filter won work anymore - Ubuntu x86_64 > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Hi all again, > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> tested a little bit more around. > >>> > >>> All Filter seems to work !!ONLY!! if you are on the Library. > >>> > >>> If I'm on a event , no Filter will work as discribed before. > >>> > >>> They will be ignored. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Even if there are pictures with *,**,** or anything else or not. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Cheers > >>> > >>> Marc > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Am 30.09.2012 08:59, schrieb Marc: > >>> > >>>> Hi, > >>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>> Before upgrading to 0.13 I had this problem: > >>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>> Shotwell starts and the default filter is set to "All photos" (STRG+0) > >>> > >>>> But shotwell shows "All photos + Rejected" and so I had to change after > >>> > >>>> every start of shotwell to another filter and back. > >>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>> I thought with 0.13 this would be better, But now the change of ANY > >>> > >>>> filter doesn show an effect and it displays only > >>> > >>>> "All photos + Rejected" > >>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>> Can someone confirm this? > >>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>> Thanks and Kind Regards > >>> > >>>> Marc > >>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>> > >>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>> > >>>> Shotwell mailing list > >>> > >>>> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > >>> > >>>> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > >>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> > >>> Shotwell mailing list > >>> > >>> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > >>> > >>> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> > >>> Shotwell mailing list > >>> > >>> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > >>> > >>> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Shotwell mailing list > >>> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > >>> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Shotwell mailing list > >> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > >> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Shotwell mailing list > > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > > > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From progman32 at gmail.com Fri Oct 5 09:37:03 2012 From: progman32 at gmail.com (Giacomo Ferrari) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 02:37:03 -0700 Subject: [Shotwell] Can't import MP4. Message-ID: Hi folks, trying to import a bunch of MP4s I just encoded. Shotwell 0.12.3 doesn't seem to want to import them - the MP4s are just skipped if I import the folder containing them, and if I drag them into Shotwell itself, Shotwell says "non image file skipped". Any ideas? Here is the output of file on the files: P1120470.mp4: ISO Media, MPEG v4 system, version 1 Best, Giacomo From jim at yorba.org Fri Oct 5 18:22:39 2012 From: jim at yorba.org (Jim Nelson) Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2012 18:15:39 -0007 Subject: [Shotwell] remember copy/import in place choice on import dialogue In-Reply-To: <506CA9F4.7030107@gmail.com> References: <506C9201.1060507@gmail.com> <506ca4ae.48cb440a.6a24.1fa6@mx.google.com> <506CA9F4.7030107@gmail.com> Message-ID: <506f2570.c6d9440a.27e2.5fdb@mx.google.com> I feel like this is too complicated for this feature. ?And worse, if it's turned off and two months later the user forgets, their imported photos may wind up in the wrong place, which can be a very frustrating experience. Expanding the menu bar is possible, but it seems like more noise in the menu bar. ?The user is going to have to navigate a dialog box (the file chooser) in any event, so it's not really saving a whole lot of time. What if Shotwell inserted a custom checkbox widget into the file chooser? ?It could be a combo box with the In Place / Copy To choices for the user to pick. ?That might be a middle ground here. Also, these possible solutions don't handle drag-and-drop. ?We would need to keep the dialog for that use case. -- Jim On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Joseph Bylund wrote: My suggestion was to not show the box again next time. Maybe under edit->preferences->library tab->importing add a radio button or drop down with three options, "in place", "copy" and "ask me every time"? The biggest issue I could see is that doing a one-off import then becomes slightly annoying for users that usually, but not always, do one of the two. A possible solution to that would be having file->import from folder expand to the "import in place" and "copy files" options, if import from folder remained click-able then it could perform the default action: file ??? import_from_app ??? import_from_folder ??? copy_files ??? in_place -Joe On 10/03/2012 04:48 PM, Jim Nelson wrote: > My only concern here is that if we do offer that checkbox, how would the user be able to un-check it? I assume that your suggestion is not to show the dialog box again if it's checked. > > -- Jim > > On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Joseph Bylund wrote: >> Didn't find a feature request for this, but I've been known to use the wrong search terms before, so asking the list: >> >> Some users (myself included) always select the same option for "import in place" or "copy photos" in the import dialogue. Imports could be made slightly less complicated for these users by including a checkbox to "remember this choice next time". >> >> -Joe >> _______________________________________________ >> Shotwell mailing list >> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > From clinton at yorba.org Fri Oct 5 18:30:29 2012 From: clinton at yorba.org (Clinton Rogers) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 11:30:29 -0700 Subject: [Shotwell] Can't import MP4. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Giacomo, It's not clear why this would occur - Shotwell 0.12.x did support importing .MP4-format videos, so this should have worked. Can you upload one of the skipped files somewhere so we can download it here and try to determine what Shotwell doesn't like about it? (We'll treat the contents as sensitive and confidential). Cheers, -c On 05/10/2012, Giacomo Ferrari wrote: > Hi folks, trying to import a bunch of MP4s I just encoded. Shotwell 0.12.3 > doesn't seem to want to import them - the MP4s are just skipped if I import > the folder containing them, and if I drag them into Shotwell itself, > Shotwell says "non image file skipped". Any ideas? Here is the output of > file on the files: > > P1120470.mp4: ISO Media, MPEG v4 system, version 1 > > Best, > Giacomo > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > -- public struct Box { public static const int HAND_GRENADES = 12; -- from shotwell/src/Box.vala From progman32 at gmail.com Fri Oct 5 18:57:04 2012 From: progman32 at gmail.com (Giacomo Ferrari) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 11:57:04 -0700 Subject: [Shotwell] Can't import MP4. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Sure. I'll do it after work today. Giacomo Ferrari (713) 471-0639 On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Clinton Rogers wrote: > Hi Giacomo, > > It's not clear why this would occur - Shotwell 0.12.x did support > importing .MP4-format videos, so this should have worked. > > Can you upload one of the skipped files somewhere so we can download > it here and try to determine what Shotwell doesn't like about it? > (We'll treat the contents as sensitive and confidential). > > Cheers, > -c > > > > On 05/10/2012, Giacomo Ferrari wrote: > > Hi folks, trying to import a bunch of MP4s I just encoded. Shotwell > 0.12.3 > > doesn't seem to want to import them - the MP4s are just skipped if I > import > > the folder containing them, and if I drag them into Shotwell itself, > > Shotwell says "non image file skipped". Any ideas? Here is the output of > > file on the files: > > > > P1120470.mp4: ISO Media, MPEG v4 system, version 1 > > > > Best, > > Giacomo > > _______________________________________________ > > Shotwell mailing list > > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > > > > > -- > public struct Box { > public static const int HAND_GRENADES = 12; > -- from shotwell/src/Box.vala > From clinton at yorba.org Fri Oct 5 21:23:13 2012 From: clinton at yorba.org (Clinton Rogers) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 14:23:13 -0700 Subject: [Shotwell] Shotwell stable release 0.13.1 Message-ID: Good afternoon, one and all, We?re pleased to announce the release of Shotwell 0.13.1. As it fixes several critical problems, we recommend that all users upgrade to this version. Among the fixes in this release: * Increased robustness against server errors and malformed responses in the publishing subsystem (http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/5907, http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/5822) * Better support for importing video from some Sony cameras (http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/3520) * Correction of a problem where the searching and filtering UI could get out of sync with what was being displayed in a user?s library (http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/5912) * Fixing of a regression in which the Send To feature didn?t work correctly with multiple photos (http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/5827) A tarball of this release can be obtained from http://yorba.org/download/shotwell/0.13/shotwell-0.13.1.tar.xz, and Ubuntu users on Precise Pangolin can obtain a pre-built version from the Yorba PPA; users on Quantal Quetzal or other distributions should have access to pre-built binaries soon through the normal update mechanisms. Again, thank you for all your interest in Shotwell, and if you have any questions or comments about this release, please feel free to respond - we love hearing from you. Cheers, -c -- public struct Box { public static const int HAND_GRENADES = 12; -- from shotwell/src/Box.vala From dougie at highmoor.co.uk Sun Oct 14 14:32:01 2012 From: dougie at highmoor.co.uk (Dougie Nisbet) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 15:32:01 +0100 Subject: [Shotwell] Installing on Linux Mint Debian Message-ID: <001801cdaa18$acd500f0$067f02d0$@highmoor.co.uk> Has anyone successfully managed to install the new Shotwell release on LMDE? I installed the dependencies and download the source tarball but I'm getting an error message about my Vala compiler being too old (needs to be 0.17.2 or later). I've tried downloading and installing Vala 0.18 but the shotwell compile still fails during make. Trying downloading/installing 0.17.2 instead at the moment. Dougie From dougie at highmoor.co.uk Sun Oct 14 19:27:10 2012 From: dougie at highmoor.co.uk (Dougie Nisbet) Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 20:27:10 +0100 Subject: [Shotwell] Installing on Linux Mint Debian In-Reply-To: <001801cdaa18$acd500f0$067f02d0$@highmoor.co.uk> References: <001801cdaa18$acd500f0$067f02d0$@highmoor.co.uk> Message-ID: <007e01cdaa41$e8177520$b8465f60$@highmoor.co.uk> > > Has anyone successfully managed to install the new Shotwell release on > LMDE? Got there in the end. After struggling for ages with the tarball I decided as a last resort to try using the magic 'git' line, and it all worked perfectly. Dougie From paulo at matos-sorge.com Mon Oct 15 20:10:33 2012 From: paulo at matos-sorge.com (Paulo J. Matos) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 21:10:33 +0100 Subject: [Shotwell] Gallery3 Connection Status Message-ID: <507C6DB9.4010700@matos-sorge.com> Hello, I would like to know how far we are into getting shotwell connected to Gallery3? Is there any code out there even if incomplete? Otherwise I will start a github repository for this and get something going. Cheers, -- PMatos From lucas at yorba.org Mon Oct 15 20:37:53 2012 From: lucas at yorba.org (Lucas Beeler) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 13:37:53 -0700 Subject: [Shotwell] Gallery3 Connection Status In-Reply-To: <507C6DB9.4010700@matos-sorge.com> References: <507C6DB9.4010700@matos-sorge.com> Message-ID: Hi Paulo, Bruno Girin told me that he had started on a Gallery 3 Web Connector, but that was more than a year and a half ago. If I recall correctly, he just didn't have enough time to keep working on it. So, by all means start working on a connector plugin for Gallery 3...we'd love to have one in Shotwell. If you need some documentation to get going, check out the Shotwell Architecture Overview and the Shotwell Plugin Writers guide. Links to both are available on the Shotwell wiki here: http://redmine.yorba.org/projects/shotwell/wiki. Cheers, Lucas On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Paulo J. Matos wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to know how far we are into getting shotwell connected to > Gallery3? Is there any code out there even if incomplete? > > Otherwise I will start a github repository for this and get something going. > > Cheers, > > -- > PMatos > > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From paulo at matos-sorge.com Mon Oct 15 22:09:15 2012 From: paulo at matos-sorge.com (Paulo J. Matos) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 23:09:15 +0100 Subject: [Shotwell] Gallery3 Connection Status In-Reply-To: References: <507C6DB9.4010700@matos-sorge.com> Message-ID: On 15/10/12 21:37, Lucas Beeler wrote: > Hi Paulo, > > Bruno Girin told me that he had started on a Gallery 3 Web Connector, > but that was more than a year and a half ago. If I recall correctly, > he just didn't have enough time to keep working on it. So, by all > means start working on a connector plugin for Gallery 3... Do you know where I can find the code he developed until now? It's always easier to start from something than from scratch (or almost always)... -- PMatos From brunogirin at gmail.com Mon Oct 15 22:13:47 2012 From: brunogirin at gmail.com (Bruno Girin) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 23:13:47 +0100 Subject: [Shotwell] Gallery3 Connection Status In-Reply-To: References: <507C6DB9.4010700@matos-sorge.com> Message-ID: <507C8A9B.1050202@gmail.com> HI Paulo, Lucas is right: I was intending to do something for it until real life took over and my free time disappeared. If you have the time to work on it, I'm happy to help you with any question you might have. If memory serves me well, I had the intention to use the Piwigo plugin as a starting point as the Gallery 3 API seems to be similar to the Piwigo one in the way it operates. Cheers, Bruno On 15/10/12 21:37, Lucas Beeler wrote: > Hi Paulo, > > Bruno Girin told me that he had started on a Gallery 3 Web Connector, > but that was more than a year and a half ago. If I recall correctly, > he just didn't have enough time to keep working on it. So, by all > means start working on a connector plugin for Gallery 3...we'd love to > have one in Shotwell. If you need some documentation to get going, > check out the Shotwell Architecture Overview and the Shotwell Plugin > Writers guide. Links to both are available on the Shotwell wiki here: > http://redmine.yorba.org/projects/shotwell/wiki. > > Cheers, > Lucas > > On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Paulo J. Matos wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I would like to know how far we are into getting shotwell connected to >> Gallery3? Is there any code out there even if incomplete? >> >> Otherwise I will start a github repository for this and get something going. >> >> Cheers, >> >> -- >> PMatos >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Shotwell mailing list >> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From brunogirin at gmail.com Mon Oct 15 22:22:40 2012 From: brunogirin at gmail.com (Bruno Girin) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 23:22:40 +0100 Subject: [Shotwell] Gallery3 Connection Status In-Reply-To: References: <507C6DB9.4010700@matos-sorge.com> Message-ID: <507C8CB0.8000304@gmail.com> On 15/10/12 23:09, Paulo J. Matos wrote: > On 15/10/12 21:37, Lucas Beeler wrote: >> Hi Paulo, >> >> Bruno Girin told me that he had started on a Gallery 3 Web Connector, >> but that was more than a year and a half ago. If I recall correctly, >> he just didn't have enough time to keep working on it. So, by all >> means start working on a connector plugin for Gallery 3... > > Do you know where I can find the code he developed until now? > It's always easier to start from something than from scratch (or > almost always)... > Details about Gallery v3 support: http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/3714 What I had started seriously looking at was Gallery v2: http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/1585. A couple of patches are attached to that ticket. You can see in comment #26 that I did a bit of analysis on how the Gallery v2, v3 and Piwigo APIs compare: http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/1585#note-26. Bruno From nigeldodd at gmail.com Tue Oct 16 18:13:25 2012 From: nigeldodd at gmail.com (Nigel Dodd) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 19:13:25 +0100 Subject: [Shotwell] how is it possible to stop Shotwell importing RAW images? Message-ID: how is it possible to stop Shotwell importing RAW images? I do not want to import RAW images since they are the equivalent of negatives and have yet to be processed into jpegs. I use another program to do this. I just want to see jpegs, gifs, pngs etc in Shotwell. thanks From lucas at yorba.org Tue Oct 16 19:55:17 2012 From: lucas at yorba.org (Lucas Beeler) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 12:55:17 -0700 Subject: [Shotwell] how is it possible to stop Shotwell importing RAW images? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Nigel, > how is it possible to stop Shotwell importing RAW images? What kind of import operation are we talkin' here: importing from a camera, dragging a folder containing photos into Shotwell, using the "Import From Folder..." option in the file menu, or importing from F-Spot? Lucas From nigeldodd at gmail.com Tue Oct 16 19:57:52 2012 From: nigeldodd at gmail.com (Nigel Dodd) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 20:57:52 +0100 Subject: [Shotwell] how is it possible to stop Shotwell importing RAW images? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: file / import from folder is what I have used and suffer the problem of not being able to deselect Raw files. Is there another way that will avoid the raw files? thanks Nigel On 16 October 2012 20:55, Lucas Beeler wrote: > Hi Nigel, > > > how is it possible to stop Shotwell importing RAW images? > > What kind of import operation are we talkin' here: importing from a > camera, dragging a folder containing photos into Shotwell, using the > "Import From Folder..." option in the file menu, or importing from > F-Spot? > > Lucas > From paulo at matos-sorge.com Tue Oct 16 21:42:29 2012 From: paulo at matos-sorge.com (Paulo J. Matos) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 22:42:29 +0100 Subject: [Shotwell] Gallery3 Connection Status In-Reply-To: <507C8A9B.1050202@gmail.com> References: <507C6DB9.4010700@matos-sorge.com> <507C8A9B.1050202@gmail.com> Message-ID: On 15/10/12 23:13, Bruno Girin wrote: > HI Paulo, > > Lucas is right: I was intending to do something for it until real life > took over and my free time disappeared. If you have the time to work on > it, I'm happy to help you with any question you might have. If memory > serves me well, I had the intention to use the Piwigo plugin as a > starting point as the Gallery 3 API seems to be similar to the Piwigo > one in the way it operates. > Unfortunately I also have to work within the confines of reality so I don't have much done but I really would like to get this done so it all depends on how easy it is to get familiar with vala, understand galleryv3 api and how much code there is already that I can reuse or adapt. So, I guess i can assume no code specific for gallery3 connection is available? Cheers, Paulo Matos > Cheers, > > Bruno > > On 15/10/12 21:37, Lucas Beeler wrote: >> Hi Paulo, >> >> Bruno Girin told me that he had started on a Gallery 3 Web Connector, >> but that was more than a year and a half ago. If I recall correctly, >> he just didn't have enough time to keep working on it. So, by all >> means start working on a connector plugin for Gallery 3...we'd love to >> have one in Shotwell. If you need some documentation to get going, >> check out the Shotwell Architecture Overview and the Shotwell Plugin >> Writers guide. Links to both are available on the Shotwell wiki here: >> http://redmine.yorba.org/projects/shotwell/wiki. >> >> Cheers, >> Lucas >> >> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Paulo J. Matos wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I would like to know how far we are into getting shotwell connected to >>> Gallery3? Is there any code out there even if incomplete? >>> >>> Otherwise I will start a github repository for this and get something going. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> -- >>> PMatos >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Shotwell mailing list >>> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >>> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell >> _______________________________________________ >> Shotwell mailing list >> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From paulo at matos-sorge.com Tue Oct 16 21:42:52 2012 From: paulo at matos-sorge.com (Paulo J. Matos) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 22:42:52 +0100 Subject: [Shotwell] Gallery3 Connection Status In-Reply-To: <507C8CB0.8000304@gmail.com> References: <507C6DB9.4010700@matos-sorge.com> <507C8CB0.8000304@gmail.com> Message-ID: On 15/10/12 23:22, Bruno Girin wrote: > > Details about Gallery v3 support: http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/3714 > > What I had started seriously looking at was Gallery v2: > http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/1585. A couple of patches are attached > to that ticket. You can see in comment #26 that I did a bit of analysis > on how the Gallery v2, v3 and Piwigo APIs compare: > http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/1585#note-26. > Thanks for all the references. Paulo Matos From brunogirin at gmail.com Wed Oct 17 21:31:51 2012 From: brunogirin at gmail.com (Bruno Girin) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 22:31:51 +0100 Subject: [Shotwell] Gallery3 Connection Status In-Reply-To: References: <507C6DB9.4010700@matos-sorge.com> <507C8A9B.1050202@gmail.com> Message-ID: <507F23C7.8070101@gmail.com> On 16/10/12 22:42, Paulo J. Matos wrote: > On 15/10/12 23:13, Bruno Girin wrote: >> HI Paulo, >> >> Lucas is right: I was intending to do something for it until real life >> took over and my free time disappeared. If you have the time to work on >> it, I'm happy to help you with any question you might have. If memory >> serves me well, I had the intention to use the Piwigo plugin as a >> starting point as the Gallery 3 API seems to be similar to the Piwigo >> one in the way it operates. >> > > Unfortunately I also have to work within the confines of reality so I > don't have much done but I really would like to get this done so it > all depends on how easy it is to get familiar with vala, understand > galleryv3 api and how much code there is already that I can reuse or > adapt. If you've worked with languages like Java, C++ or C#, Vala will be easy to pick up. The Piwigo code is a good start. I tried to arrange the code in such a way that the method are in the order in which they are triggered inside the plugin. Based on what I remember from the Gallery v3 code, you should also be able to re-use some of the code that's in the REST classes. > > So, I guess i can assume no code specific for gallery3 connection is > available? Unfortunately not, there is currently no Gallery v3 specific code anywhere. Cheers, Bruno From onefiftyfour at hotmail.com Thu Oct 18 14:04:22 2012 From: onefiftyfour at hotmail.com (Eric L) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:04:22 -0500 Subject: [Shotwell] shotwell crashing after installing gstreamer-ffmpeg Message-ID: So yesterday I installed gstreamer-ffmpeg to get video thumbnails to work. And shotwell did start creating video thumbnails. No crashing yesterday, but I don't think I had it running very long. Today, I start shotwell. Start an import (with videos), Walk the dog, Comeback and there's no shotwell running. I start it again from the command line. Shotwell closes after less than a minute. - Segmentation fault I'm running Fedora 17 and the latest Shotwell from git. What do you think? -Eric From lucas at yorba.org Thu Oct 18 18:11:46 2012 From: lucas at yorba.org (Lucas Beeler) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 11:11:46 -0700 Subject: [Shotwell] shotwell crashing after installing gstreamer-ffmpeg In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Eric, There's little I can say about your problem without more diagnostic information. Specifically, it would be very helpful to have a stack trace and log file from the crash. To learn how to generate both of these, See the "I found a bug in Shotwell. How can I report it?" section of the Shotwell FAQ here: http://redmine.yorba.org/projects/shotwell/wiki/ShotwellFAQ#I-found-a-bug-in-Shotwell-How-can-I-report-it. The Shotwell mailing list doesn't accept attachments, but you can send an email with an attachment directly to the Shotwell dev team by emailing shotwell at yorba.org. Lucas On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 7:04 AM, Eric L wrote: > > So yesterday I installed gstreamer-ffmpeg to get video thumbnails to work. And shotwell did start creating video thumbnails. No crashing yesterday, but I don't think I had it running very long. > Today, I start shotwell. Start an import (with videos), Walk the dog, Comeback and there's no shotwell running. > I start it again from the command line. Shotwell closes after less than a minute. - Segmentation fault > I'm running Fedora 17 and the latest Shotwell from git. > What do you think? > -Eric > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From lucas at yorba.org Thu Oct 18 18:18:02 2012 From: lucas at yorba.org (Lucas Beeler) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 11:18:02 -0700 Subject: [Shotwell] how is it possible to stop Shotwell importing RAW images? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Nigel, Shotwell provides view filtering during camera import but not during import from a folder. So, as of right now, the feature you've requested isn't available in Shotwell. That said, I think filtering on folder import by file type would be a useful feature and I've opened a request for it in our bug tracking system here: http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/6002. As a temporary workaround, I would simply advise you to move all of the RAW files out of the folder before performing the import operation. You could then copy them back into the folder after the import is completed. Lucas On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Nigel Dodd wrote: > file / import from folder is what I have used and suffer the problem of not > being able to deselect Raw files. Is there another way that will avoid the > raw files? > > thanks > Nigel > > > On 16 October 2012 20:55, Lucas Beeler wrote: >> >> Hi Nigel, >> >> > how is it possible to stop Shotwell importing RAW images? >> >> What kind of import operation are we talkin' here: importing from a >> camera, dragging a folder containing photos into Shotwell, using the >> "Import From Folder..." option in the file menu, or importing from >> F-Spot? >> >> Lucas > > From clinton at yorba.org Thu Oct 18 18:34:54 2012 From: clinton at yorba.org (Clinton Rogers) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 11:34:54 -0700 Subject: [Shotwell] shotwell crashing after installing gstreamer-ffmpeg In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi all, Apologies for bothering the list, but this sounds very much like a problem some users were encountering if the thumbnailer tried to run on a machine with certain versions of gstreamer-plugins-bad installed; in that case, the crash was not in the Shotwell code itself, but rather in an underlying library (please see http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/5252 and https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683053). Eric, if you do manage to obtain a stacktrace and happen to see it crashing at or near the same spot in dca_syncinfo(), please let us know; I seem to remember there being some combination of libraries that could be installed as a workaround, or one could build and install libdca from source from VLC's trunk (the version they have is somewhat ahead of what's being used in GStreamer at the moment, it seems, and the crash has been fixed). Cheers, -c On 18/10/2012, Lucas Beeler wrote: > Hi Eric, > > There's little I can say about your problem without more diagnostic > information. Specifically, it would be very helpful to have a stack > trace and log file from the crash. To learn how to generate both of > these, See the "I found a bug in Shotwell. How can I report it?" > section of the Shotwell FAQ here: > http://redmine.yorba.org/projects/shotwell/wiki/ShotwellFAQ#I-found-a-bug-in-Shotwell-How-can-I-report-it. > The Shotwell mailing list doesn't accept attachments, but you can send > an email with an attachment directly to the Shotwell dev team by > emailing shotwell at yorba.org. > > Lucas > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 7:04 AM, Eric L wrote: >> >> So yesterday I installed gstreamer-ffmpeg to get video thumbnails to work. >> And shotwell did start creating video thumbnails. No crashing yesterday, >> but I don't think I had it running very long. >> Today, I start shotwell. Start an import (with videos), Walk the dog, >> Comeback and there's no shotwell running. >> I start it again from the command line. Shotwell closes after less than a >> minute. - Segmentation fault >> I'm running Fedora 17 and the latest Shotwell from git. >> What do you think? >> -Eric >> _______________________________________________ >> Shotwell mailing list >> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > -- public struct Box { public static const int HAND_GRENADES = 12; -- from shotwell/src/Box.vala From joseph.bylund at gmail.com Thu Oct 18 20:04:59 2012 From: joseph.bylund at gmail.com (Joseph Bylund) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 16:04:59 -0400 Subject: [Shotwell] infinite loop on "writing metadata to files" Message-ID: <508060EB.9020500@gmail.com> I'm getting an infinite loop in shotwell on "writing metadata to files". Anyone else seen this behavior? The files can be found here: http://www.columbia.edu/~jhb2147/shotwell/ Permissions I guess are ok (this is on my home machine)? -rw------- 1 jbylund ants 2023130 Oct 18 16:04 12_1.jpg -rw-r--r-- 1 jbylund ants 2023130 Oct 18 16:04 12_1_modified.jpg Thanks, -Joe Log looks like: ... L 20759 2012-10-18 16:01:50 [WRN] No namespace info available for XMP prefix `lr' L 20759 2012-10-18 16:01:50 [WRN] No namespace info available for XMP prefix `lr' L 20759 2012-10-18 16:01:53 [MSG] MetadataWriter.vala:599: Completed writing metadata for [13459] /home/jbylund/Pictures/Photos/2012/10/14/12_1.jpg (/home/jbylund/Pictures/Photos/2012/10/14/12_1_modified.jpg) L 20759 2012-10-18 16:01:53 [WRN] No namespace info available for XMP prefix `lr' L 20759 2012-10-18 16:01:53 [WRN] No namespace info available for XMP prefix `lr' L 20759 2012-10-18 16:01:56 [MSG] MetadataWriter.vala:599: Completed writing metadata for [13459] /home/jbylund/Pictures/Photos/2012/10/14/12_1.jpg (/home/jbylund/Pictures/Photos/2012/10/14/12_1_modified.jpg) L 20759 2012-10-18 16:01:56 [WRN] No namespace info available for XMP prefix `lr' L 20759 2012-10-18 16:01:56 [WRN] No namespace info available for XMP prefix `lr' L 20759 2012-10-18 16:01:59 [MSG] MetadataWriter.vala:599: Completed writing metadata for [13459] /home/jbylund/Pictures/Photos/2012/10/14/12_1.jpg (/home/jbylund/Pictures/Photos/2012/10/14/12_1_modified.jpg) L 20759 2012-10-18 16:01:59 [WRN] No namespace info available for XMP prefix `lr' L 20759 2012-10-18 16:01:59 [WRN] No namespace info available for XMP prefix `lr' L 20759 2012-10-18 16:02:02 [MSG] MetadataWriter.vala:599: Completed writing metadata for [13459] /home/jbylund/Pictures/Photos/2012/10/14/12_1.jpg (/home/jbylund/Pictures/Photos/2012/10/14/12_1_modified.jpg) L 20759 2012-10-18 16:02:02 [WRN] No namespace info available for XMP prefix `lr' L 20759 2012-10-18 16:02:02 [WRN] No namespace info available for XMP prefix `lr' L 20759 2012-10-18 16:02:05 [MSG] MetadataWriter.vala:599: Completed writing metadata for [13459] /home/jbylund/Pictures/Photos/2012/10/14/12_1.jpg (/home/jbylund/Pictures/Photos/2012/10/14/12_1_modified.jpg) L 20759 2012-10-18 16:02:05 [WRN] No namespace info available for XMP prefix `lr' L 20759 2012-10-18 16:02:05 [WRN] No namespace info available for XMP prefix `lr' L 20759 2012-10-18 16:02:08 [MSG] MetadataWriter.vala:599: Completed writing metadata for [13459] /home/jbylund/Pictures/Photos/2012/10/14/12_1.jpg (/home/jbylund/Pictures/Photos/2012/10/14/12_1_modified.jpg) L 20759 2012-10-18 16:02:08 [WRN] No namespace info available for XMP prefix `lr' L 20759 2012-10-18 16:02:08 [WRN] No namespace info available for XMP prefix `lr' L 20759 2012-10-18 16:02:11 [MSG] MetadataWriter.vala:599: Completed writing metadata for [13459] /home/jbylund/Pictures/Photos/2012/10/14/12_1.jpg (/home/jbylund/Pictures/Photos/2012/10/14/12_1_modified.jpg) L 20759 2012-10-18 16:02:11 [WRN] No namespace info available for XMP prefix `lr' L 20759 2012-10-18 16:02:11 [WRN] No namespace info available for XMP prefix `lr' L 20759 2012-10-18 16:02:14 [MSG] MetadataWriter.vala:599: Completed writing metadata for [13459] /home/jbylund/Pictures/Photos/2012/10/14/12_1.jpg (/home/jbylund/Pictures/Photos/2012/10/14/12_1_modified.jpg) ... From clinton at yorba.org Thu Oct 18 22:24:07 2012 From: clinton at yorba.org (Clinton Rogers) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 15:24:07 -0700 Subject: [Shotwell] infinite loop on "writing metadata to files" In-Reply-To: <508060EB.9020500@gmail.com> References: <508060EB.9020500@gmail.com> Message-ID: Hi Joseph, On 18/10/2012, Joseph Bylund wrote: > I'm getting an infinite loop in shotwell on "writing metadata to > files". Anyone else seen this behavior? Unfortunately, people have reported this in the past, and, although we did deploy what we thought was a fix at the time (please have a look at http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4297), it seems that there is at least one alternate reproduction path that the patch doesn't correctly handle. The original problem was that, due to the way hierarchical tags are written out to images, Shotwell would become confused over fully-qualified vs. 'shortened form' tags and unable to detect that something like /entomology/insects/ants ...and... 'ants' referred to the same tag, and because it didn't see the former in the file it was trying to save to, it would repeatedly write the latter. > The files can be found here: http://www.columbia.edu/~jhb2147/shotwell/ Thanks for that; perhaps there's some clue within the tags/keywords fields in the image headers. > Permissions I guess are ok (this is on my home machine)? > -rw------- 1 jbylund ants 2023130 Oct 18 16:04 12_1.jpg > -rw-r--r-- 1 jbylund ants 2023130 Oct 18 16:04 12_1_modified.jpg The permissions look about right for something in one's home directory; that's almost certainly not the problem. > Thanks, > -Joe Thank you for taking time to share some affected files with us; hopefully, we'll be able to trigger the problem, and, with that, cook up a suitable fix. Cheers, -c From onefiftyfour at hotmail.com Fri Oct 19 13:45:23 2012 From: onefiftyfour at hotmail.com (Eric L) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 08:45:23 -0500 Subject: [Shotwell] shotwell crashing after installing gstreamer-ffmpeg In-Reply-To: References: , , Message-ID: I've emailed the stacktrace and log to shotwell at yorba dot org. To clarify my situation, shotwell is running fine for me with gstreamer-plugins-ffmpeg and WITHOUT gstreamer-plugins-bad. I'm getting thumbnails on my .MOV files. For the stacktrace, I reinstalled gstreamer-plugins-bad. -Eric > Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 11:34:54 -0700 > Subject: Re: [Shotwell] shotwell crashing after installing gstreamer-ffmpeg > From: clinton at yorba.org > To: lucas at yorba.org > CC: onefiftyfour at hotmail.com; shotwell at lists.yorba.org > > Hi all, > > Apologies for bothering the list, but this sounds very much like a > problem some users were encountering if the thumbnailer tried to run > on a machine with certain versions of gstreamer-plugins-bad installed; > in that case, the crash was not in the Shotwell code itself, but > rather in an underlying library (please see > http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/5252 and > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683053). > > Eric, if you do manage to obtain a stacktrace and happen to see it > crashing at or near the same spot in dca_syncinfo(), please let us > know; I seem to remember there being some combination of libraries > that could be installed as a workaround, or one could build and > install libdca from source from VLC's trunk (the version they have is > somewhat ahead of what's being used in GStreamer at the moment, it > seems, and the crash has been fixed). > > Cheers, > -c > > On 18/10/2012, Lucas Beeler wrote: > > Hi Eric, > > > > There's little I can say about your problem without more diagnostic > > information. Specifically, it would be very helpful to have a stack > > trace and log file from the crash. To learn how to generate both of > > these, See the "I found a bug in Shotwell. How can I report it?" > > section of the Shotwell FAQ here: > > http://redmine.yorba.org/projects/shotwell/wiki/ShotwellFAQ#I-found-a-bug-in-Shotwell-How-can-I-report-it. > > The Shotwell mailing list doesn't accept attachments, but you can send > > an email with an attachment directly to the Shotwell dev team by > > emailing shotwell at yorba.org. > > > > Lucas > > > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 7:04 AM, Eric L wrote: > >> > >> So yesterday I installed gstreamer-ffmpeg to get video thumbnails to work. > >> And shotwell did start creating video thumbnails. No crashing yesterday, > >> but I don't think I had it running very long. > >> Today, I start shotwell. Start an import (with videos), Walk the dog, > >> Comeback and there's no shotwell running. > >> I start it again from the command line. Shotwell closes after less than a > >> minute. - Segmentation fault > >> I'm running Fedora 17 and the latest Shotwell from git. > >> What do you think? > >> -Eric > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Shotwell mailing list > >> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > >> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > > _______________________________________________ > > Shotwell mailing list > > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > > > > > -- > public struct Box { > public static const int HAND_GRENADES = 12; > -- from shotwell/src/Box.vala From lucas at yorba.org Fri Oct 19 18:35:19 2012 From: lucas at yorba.org (Lucas Beeler) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 11:35:19 -0700 Subject: [Shotwell] shotwell crashing after installing gstreamer-ffmpeg In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Eric, You have indeed encountered the previously known issue that Clinton mentioned in his earlier message. We have a ticket for the problem and we've filed a bug with the GStreamer team as well. Feel free to subscribe to the bug ticket that Clinton mentioned for updates. Lucas On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 6:45 AM, Eric L wrote: > > I've emailed the stacktrace and log to shotwell at yorba dot org. > To clarify my situation, shotwell is running fine for me with gstreamer-plugins-ffmpeg and WITHOUT gstreamer-plugins-bad. I'm getting thumbnails on my .MOV files. > For the stacktrace, I reinstalled gstreamer-plugins-bad. > -Eric >> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 11:34:54 -0700 >> Subject: Re: [Shotwell] shotwell crashing after installing gstreamer-ffmpeg >> From: clinton at yorba.org >> To: lucas at yorba.org >> CC: onefiftyfour at hotmail.com; shotwell at lists.yorba.org >> >> Hi all, >> >> Apologies for bothering the list, but this sounds very much like a >> problem some users were encountering if the thumbnailer tried to run >> on a machine with certain versions of gstreamer-plugins-bad installed; >> in that case, the crash was not in the Shotwell code itself, but >> rather in an underlying library (please see >> http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/5252 and >> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683053). >> >> Eric, if you do manage to obtain a stacktrace and happen to see it >> crashing at or near the same spot in dca_syncinfo(), please let us >> know; I seem to remember there being some combination of libraries >> that could be installed as a workaround, or one could build and >> install libdca from source from VLC's trunk (the version they have is >> somewhat ahead of what's being used in GStreamer at the moment, it >> seems, and the crash has been fixed). >> >> Cheers, >> -c >> >> On 18/10/2012, Lucas Beeler wrote: >> > Hi Eric, >> > >> > There's little I can say about your problem without more diagnostic >> > information. Specifically, it would be very helpful to have a stack >> > trace and log file from the crash. To learn how to generate both of >> > these, See the "I found a bug in Shotwell. How can I report it?" >> > section of the Shotwell FAQ here: >> > http://redmine.yorba.org/projects/shotwell/wiki/ShotwellFAQ#I-found-a-bug-in-Shotwell-How-can-I-report-it. >> > The Shotwell mailing list doesn't accept attachments, but you can send >> > an email with an attachment directly to the Shotwell dev team by >> > emailing shotwell at yorba.org. >> > >> > Lucas >> > >> > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 7:04 AM, Eric L wrote: >> >> >> >> So yesterday I installed gstreamer-ffmpeg to get video thumbnails to work. >> >> And shotwell did start creating video thumbnails. No crashing yesterday, >> >> but I don't think I had it running very long. >> >> Today, I start shotwell. Start an import (with videos), Walk the dog, >> >> Comeback and there's no shotwell running. >> >> I start it again from the command line. Shotwell closes after less than a >> >> minute. - Segmentation fault >> >> I'm running Fedora 17 and the latest Shotwell from git. >> >> What do you think? >> >> -Eric >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Shotwell mailing list >> >> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >> >> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Shotwell mailing list >> > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >> > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell >> > >> >> >> -- >> public struct Box { >> public static const int HAND_GRENADES = 12; >> -- from shotwell/src/Box.vala > > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From joseph.bylund at gmail.com Wed Oct 24 03:07:44 2012 From: joseph.bylund at gmail.com (Joseph Bylund) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 23:07:44 -0400 Subject: [Shotwell] Multiply Selected Enhance no longer works Message-ID: <50875B80.8050800@gmail.com> I'm getting some very strange behavior when I select multiple thumbnails and try to use the enhance tool. I can see the photos change, but once it progresses past the first two it starts reverting. I made a video because I realize this is difficult to describe: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lglas6v0ROg I only see this behavior intermittently (the first time I tried to make the video it worked as it should). I'm not sure in which situations this occurs and in which it works properly (sorry). -Joe From clinton at yorba.org Wed Oct 24 21:23:57 2012 From: clinton at yorba.org (Clinton Rogers) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 14:23:57 -0700 Subject: [Shotwell] 'TagTable Column Not Unique' Error Message-ID: Good afternoon, one and all, My name is Clint, and I'm one of the developers currently working on Shotwell. Recently, we've had a small-but-increasing number of reports that, on occasion, users with tagged, externally-edited images can encounter a crash (please see http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/5754 or http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/5992) with an error message of: A fatal error occurred when accessing Shotwell's library. Shotwell cannot continue. (TagTable.add) [19] - column name is not unique Unfortunately, although it does seem to have affected an alarming number of users, we've never been able to reproduce it here, and, as such, haven't been able to determine a cause or, more importantly, a proper fix. With this in mind, I'd like to ask all of you the following: 1) Have you ever seen this, and if so, how often? Did it stop occurring after exiting and re-running the application? 2) If you can recall, what did you do prior to this? Did it involve an external edit or any tag manipulation of your image library from within another application? 3) If you're seeing this crash reliably and are comfortable with building things from source, can you try cloning the latest Shotwell tree from our git repository, applying http://redmine.yorba.org/attachments/1508/5754-and-5992.patch and rebuilding? (A full discussion of what this patch does is available at http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/5992.) Does it help at all? Thank you in advance, -Clint From clinton at yorba.org Wed Oct 24 21:34:17 2012 From: clinton at yorba.org (Clinton Rogers) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 14:34:17 -0700 Subject: [Shotwell] infinite loop on "writing metadata to files" In-Reply-To: References: <508060EB.9020500@gmail.com> Message-ID: Mr. Bylund, I wanted to let you and the list know we haven't forgotten about this issue, and, as luck would have it, the test library on my work desktop here now exhibits the same problem. I got myself into this state by accident while researching another metadata-related ticket (please see http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/5992), and now believe the two bugs are at least partially-related; hopefully, whatever is causing this will be at least improved by work we do on #5992. Cheers, -c On 18/10/2012, Clinton Rogers wrote: > Hi Joseph, > > On 18/10/2012, Joseph Bylund wrote: >> I'm getting an infinite loop in shotwell on "writing metadata to >> files". Anyone else seen this behavior? > > Unfortunately, people have reported this in the past, and, although we > did deploy what we thought was a fix at the time (please have a look > at http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4297), it seems that there is at > least one alternate reproduction path that the patch doesn't correctly > handle. > > The original problem was that, due to the way hierarchical tags are > written out to images, Shotwell would become confused over > fully-qualified vs. 'shortened form' tags and unable to detect that > something like > /entomology/insects/ants > ...and... > 'ants' > referred to the same tag, and because it didn't see the former in the > file it was trying to save to, it would repeatedly write the latter. > >> The files can be found here: http://www.columbia.edu/~jhb2147/shotwell/ > > Thanks for that; perhaps there's some clue within the tags/keywords > fields in the image headers. > >> Permissions I guess are ok (this is on my home machine)? >> -rw------- 1 jbylund ants 2023130 Oct 18 16:04 12_1.jpg >> -rw-r--r-- 1 jbylund ants 2023130 Oct 18 16:04 12_1_modified.jpg > > The permissions look about right for something in one's home > directory; that's almost certainly not the problem. > >> Thanks, >> -Joe > > Thank you for taking time to share some affected files with us; > hopefully, we'll be able to trigger the problem, and, with that, cook > up a suitable fix. > > Cheers, > -c > -- public struct Box { public static const int HAND_GRENADES = 12; -- from shotwell/src/Box.vala From mweisshaupt1988 at googlemail.com Wed Oct 24 22:26:44 2012 From: mweisshaupt1988 at googlemail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Martin_Wei=DFhaupt?=) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 00:26:44 +0200 Subject: [Shotwell] Shotwell has problems after thumbnails have been deleted on disk Message-ID: <50886B24.8030509@gmail.com> Hi, after upgrading to Ubuntu 12.10 shotwell has a problem on my computer. I don't know exactly why but it seems that the folder .cache has been deleted from my home-dir. Now shotwell does not show the thumbnails for a lot of files and this error occures over and over again: L 2488 2012-10-25 00:21:34 [CRT] Thumbnail.vala:341: Unable to fetch high-quality thumbnail for DataView 11838000.jpg [DataSource [4991] /media/Daten/Bilder/.shotwell/pics/2011/01/21/11838000.jpg (/media/Daten/Bilder/.shotwell/pics/2011/01/21/11838000_ver?ndert_1.jpg)] (scale: 189): Datei ?/home/mweisshaupt/.cache/shotwell/thumbs/thumbs360/thumb000000000000137f.jpg? konnte nicht ge?ffnet werden: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden The last part says that the thumbnail file could not be found. Is there a way to remove all thumbnail references so that everything is generated again? I've searched the database for this but all I could find was related thumbnails to a tag... Thx, Martin From lucas at yorba.org Wed Oct 24 22:35:36 2012 From: lucas at yorba.org (Lucas Beeler) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 15:35:36 -0700 Subject: [Shotwell] Shotwell has problems after thumbnails have been deleted on disk In-Reply-To: <50886B24.8030509@gmail.com> References: <50886B24.8030509@gmail.com> Message-ID: Hi Martin, Just to confirm, you are using a custom library directory, right? This is to say, your Shotwell library directory isn't ~/Pictures? Lucas On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Martin Wei?haupt wrote: > Hi, > > after upgrading to Ubuntu 12.10 shotwell has a problem on my computer. > I don't know exactly why but it seems that the folder .cache has been > deleted from my home-dir. > > Now shotwell does not show the thumbnails for a lot of files and this error > occures over and over again: > > L 2488 2012-10-25 00:21:34 [CRT] Thumbnail.vala:341: Unable to fetch > high-quality thumbnail for DataView 11838000.jpg [DataSource [4991] > /media/Daten/Bilder/.shotwell/pics/2011/01/21/11838000.jpg > (/media/Daten/Bilder/.shotwell/pics/2011/01/21/11838000_ver?ndert_1.jpg)] > (scale: 189): Datei > ?/home/mweisshaupt/.cache/shotwell/thumbs/thumbs360/thumb000000000000137f.jpg? > konnte nicht ge?ffnet werden: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden > > The last part says that the thumbnail file could not be found. > > Is there a way to remove all thumbnail references so that everything is > generated again? > I've searched the database for this but all I could find was related > thumbnails to a tag... > > Thx, > Martin > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From lucas at yorba.org Wed Oct 24 22:49:50 2012 From: lucas at yorba.org (Lucas Beeler) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 15:49:50 -0700 Subject: [Shotwell] Multiply Selected Enhance no longer works In-Reply-To: <50875B80.8050800@gmail.com> References: <50875B80.8050800@gmail.com> Message-ID: Hi Joseph, I've been trying to reproduce your problem here but so far haven't been able to. You seem to be a technically proficient user and have submitted Shotwell bug reports before. So I have the following question: is there anything about your machine or setup that is unusual? Examples of "unusual" configuration options include, but are not limited to: * Using a library directory other than ~/Pictures * Having your library directory located on a removable storage device (such an external USB or FireWire hard disk) or a network share * Running Shotwell with the -d option at startup * Having a library that contains a large number (e.g., over 1000) of RAW images Furthermore, a few general questions: first, are you running with library monitoring turned on (i.e. the "Watch library directory for new files" option in the Preferences dialog is checked)? Second, are you running with metadata writing turned on? Third, in the set of photos that you multiple-select and then enhance, are there any RAW images? Fourth, have you edited any of the photos in the selected set in an external editor? Lucas From thomas at xyz.pp.se Thu Oct 25 12:27:32 2012 From: thomas at xyz.pp.se (Thomas Novin) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 14:27:32 +0200 Subject: [Shotwell] Multiply Selected Enhance no longer works In-Reply-To: References: <50875B80.8050800@gmail.com> Message-ID: On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 12:49 AM, Lucas Beeler wrote: > question: is there anything about your machine or setup that is > unusual? Examples of "unusual" configuration options include, but are > not limited to: > > * Using a library directory other than ~/Pictures > > * Having your library directory located on a removable storage > device (such an external USB or FireWire hard disk) or a network share > > * Running Shotwell with the -d option at startup > > * Having a library that contains a large number (e.g., over 1000) > of RAW images > > Furthermore, a few general questions: first, are you running with > library monitoring turned on (i.e. the "Watch library directory for > new files" option in the Preferences dialog is checked)? Second, are > you running with metadata writing turned on? Third, in the set of > photos that you multiple-select and then enhance, are there any RAW > images? Fourth, have you edited any of the photos in the selected set > in an external editor? > Hello A suggestion from one working a lot with network equipment. Always before submitting bugs you have a command to run to collect all necessary debug info. For example, in Alcatel-Lucent carrier products you do 'admin tech-support' and a file is written to a cf-card which you submit when reporting a bug/problem. In this file all important info about the system is written. For Debian-based systems (and possible others) you have apport-bug(1) which does pretty much the same but also reports a bug. Something similar for Shotwell would be a good thing. Would make it much easier to handle all bug reports. Rgds//Thomas From mweisshaupt1988 at googlemail.com Fri Oct 26 16:51:24 2012 From: mweisshaupt1988 at googlemail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Martin_Wei=DFhaupt?=) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 18:51:24 +0200 Subject: [Shotwell] Shotwell has problems after thumbnails have been deleted on disk In-Reply-To: References: <50886B24.8030509@gmail.com> Message-ID: <508ABF8C.2060901@gmail.com> Hi Lucas, yes, I'm using the custom library directory. I'll check if I can reproduce this problem with the default library. Best wishes, Martin Am 25.10.2012 00:35, schrieb Lucas Beeler: > Hi Martin, > > Just to confirm, you are using a custom library directory, right? This > is to say, your Shotwell library directory isn't ~/Pictures? > > Lucas > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Martin Wei?haupt > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> after upgrading to Ubuntu 12.10 shotwell has a problem on my computer. >> I don't know exactly why but it seems that the folder .cache has been >> deleted from my home-dir. >> >> Now shotwell does not show the thumbnails for a lot of files and this error >> occures over and over again: >> >> L 2488 2012-10-25 00:21:34 [CRT] Thumbnail.vala:341: Unable to fetch >> high-quality thumbnail for DataView 11838000.jpg [DataSource [4991] >> /media/Daten/Bilder/.shotwell/pics/2011/01/21/11838000.jpg >> (/media/Daten/Bilder/.shotwell/pics/2011/01/21/11838000_ver?ndert_1.jpg)] >> (scale: 189): Datei >> ?/home/mweisshaupt/.cache/shotwell/thumbs/thumbs360/thumb000000000000137f.jpg? >> konnte nicht ge?ffnet werden: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden >> >> The last part says that the thumbnail file could not be found. >> >> Is there a way to remove all thumbnail references so that everything is >> generated again? >> I've searched the database for this but all I could find was related >> thumbnails to a tag... >> >> Thx, >> Martin >> _______________________________________________ >> Shotwell mailing list >> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From senewag at iinet.com.au Sat Oct 27 05:40:55 2012 From: senewag at iinet.com.au (bryan) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 13:40:55 +0800 Subject: [Shotwell] Shotwell has problems after thumbnails have been deleted on disk In-Reply-To: <508ABF8C.2060901@gmail.com> References: <50886B24.8030509@gmail.com> <508ABF8C.2060901@gmail.com> Message-ID: <508B73E7.4050605@iinet.com.au> Hi, I was losing all my thumbnails too. I found the problem was caused by another program, Bleachbit, which I use to clears unnecessary files. In this case I unchecked Bleachbit's "system cache" option which clears the clipboard, cache, broken desktop files, overwrites free disk space, wipes the swap and free memory, temporary files etc, and this fixed the problem. On 27/10/12 00:51, Martin Wei?haupt wrote: > Hi Lucas, > > yes, I'm using the custom library directory. > I'll check if I can reproduce this problem with the default library. > > Best wishes, > Martin > > Am 25.10.2012 00:35, schrieb Lucas Beeler: >> Hi Martin, >> >> Just to confirm, you are using a custom library directory, right? This >> is to say, your Shotwell library directory isn't ~/Pictures? >> >> Lucas >> >> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Martin Wei?haupt >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> after upgrading to Ubuntu 12.10 shotwell has a problem on my computer. >>> I don't know exactly why but it seems that the folder .cache has been >>> deleted from my home-dir. >>> >>> Now shotwell does not show the thumbnails for a lot of files and >>> this error >>> occures over and over again: >>> >>> L 2488 2012-10-25 00:21:34 [CRT] Thumbnail.vala:341: Unable to fetch >>> high-quality thumbnail for DataView 11838000.jpg [DataSource [4991] >>> /media/Daten/Bilder/.shotwell/pics/2011/01/21/11838000.jpg >>> (/media/Daten/Bilder/.shotwell/pics/2011/01/21/11838000_ver?ndert_1.jpg)] >>> >>> (scale: 189): Datei >>> ?/home/mweisshaupt/.cache/shotwell/thumbs/thumbs360/thumb000000000000137f.jpg? >>> >>> konnte nicht ge?ffnet werden: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden >>> >>> The last part says that the thumbnail file could not be found. >>> >>> Is there a way to remove all thumbnail references so that everything is >>> generated again? >>> I've searched the database for this but all I could find was related >>> thumbnails to a tag... >>> >>> Thx, >>> Martin >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Shotwell mailing list >>> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >>> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From okeefe at cybermesa.com Sun Oct 28 04:14:46 2012 From: okeefe at cybermesa.com (BrianO'Keefe) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 22:14:46 -0600 Subject: [Shotwell] Shotwell doesn't open movieplayer Message-ID: <508CB136.3010907@cybermesa.com> Before I upgraded my Ubuntu from 10.10 to 11.04 I could open an avi video in Shotwell and Totem would pop up and play it. Now I only get an error: "Could not display xxx/xxxx/xxx.avi the location is not a folder". How can I get Shotwell to play nice with Totem and play my movie files that I have imported? Thanks Brian From thomas at xyz.pp.se Mon Oct 29 08:13:50 2012 From: thomas at xyz.pp.se (Thomas Novin) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 09:13:50 +0100 Subject: [Shotwell] xbmc-shotwell Browse events, tags and pictures in Shotwell Message-ID: Hello First, this is a plugin to XBMC Media Center which many people use ( http://xbmc.org/). This is not my plugin, but I wanted to make people observant that it exists. I was very glad to find it myself. Browse events, tags and pictures in the Shotwell picture library using XBMC. This plugin is tested on Ubuntu Linux 11.04 XBMC Eden (Beta version) Shotwell 0.11.6 Known issues Modified pictures via Shotwell are not shown, only the original ones. URL: https://code.google.com/p/xbmc-shotwell/ Right now it only supports older Shotwell versions (at most 0.12.3 I think) but I've added a issue on the tracker to support 0.13.x. I edited the source my self to just use the new locations of the db and the cache-folder and it works although all categories are empty when you start the script (you can press them anyway). Rgds//Thomas From mweisshaupt1988 at googlemail.com Mon Oct 29 12:24:23 2012 From: mweisshaupt1988 at googlemail.com (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Martin_Wei=DFhaupt?=) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 13:24:23 +0100 Subject: [Shotwell] Shotwell has problems after thumbnails have been deleted on disk In-Reply-To: <508B73E7.4050605@iinet.com.au> References: <50886B24.8030509@gmail.com> <508ABF8C.2060901@gmail.com> <508B73E7.4050605@iinet.com.au> Message-ID: <008401cdb5d0$55699420$003cbc60$@gmail.com> Hi, well, I have not used a tool to clear things up but somehow the problem existed after upgrading ubuntu (maby ubuntu did the cleaning...). It seems that this problem exists for other users too. So I'll create a bug report for it. -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: shotwell-bounces at lists.yorba.org [mailto:shotwell-bounces at lists.yorba.org] Im Auftrag von bryan Gesendet: Samstag, 27. Oktober 2012 07:41 An: shotwell at lists.yorba.org Betreff: Re: [Shotwell] Shotwell has problems after thumbnails have been deleted on disk Hi, I was losing all my thumbnails too. I found the problem was caused by another program, Bleachbit, which I use to clears unnecessary files. In this case I unchecked Bleachbit's "system cache" option which clears the clipboard, cache, broken desktop files, overwrites free disk space, wipes the swap and free memory, temporary files etc, and this fixed the problem. On 27/10/12 00:51, Martin Wei?haupt wrote: > Hi Lucas, > > yes, I'm using the custom library directory. > I'll check if I can reproduce this problem with the default library. > > Best wishes, > Martin > > Am 25.10.2012 00:35, schrieb Lucas Beeler: >> Hi Martin, >> >> Just to confirm, you are using a custom library directory, right? >> This is to say, your Shotwell library directory isn't ~/Pictures? >> >> Lucas >> >> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Martin Wei?haupt >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> after upgrading to Ubuntu 12.10 shotwell has a problem on my computer. >>> I don't know exactly why but it seems that the folder .cache has >>> been deleted from my home-dir. >>> >>> Now shotwell does not show the thumbnails for a lot of files and >>> this error occures over and over again: >>> >>> L 2488 2012-10-25 00:21:34 [CRT] Thumbnail.vala:341: Unable to fetch >>> high-quality thumbnail for DataView 11838000.jpg [DataSource [4991] >>> /media/Daten/Bilder/.shotwell/pics/2011/01/21/11838000.jpg >>> (/media/Daten/Bilder/.shotwell/pics/2011/01/21/11838000_ver?ndert_1. >>> jpg)] >>> >>> (scale: 189): Datei >>> ?/home/mweisshaupt/.cache/shotwell/thumbs/thumbs360/thumb00000000000 >>> 0137f.jpg? >>> >>> konnte nicht ge?ffnet werden: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden >>> >>> The last part says that the thumbnail file could not be found. >>> >>> Is there a way to remove all thumbnail references so that everything >>> is generated again? >>> I've searched the database for this but all I could find was related >>> thumbnails to a tag... >>> >>> Thx, >>> Martin >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Shotwell mailing list >>> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >>> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell _______________________________________________ Shotwell mailing list Shotwell at lists.yorba.org http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From thomas at xyz.pp.se Mon Oct 29 17:51:31 2012 From: thomas at xyz.pp.se (Thomas Novin) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 18:51:31 +0100 Subject: [Shotwell] Yorba PPA Message-ID: Hello Can you please add support for Quantal/12.10? Also, you have several versions supported which are EOL[1] from Ubuntu. EOS versions: 8.04 8.10 9.04 9.10 10.10 11.04 Rgds//Thomas 1. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases From okeefe at cybermesa.com Mon Oct 29 19:58:53 2012 From: okeefe at cybermesa.com (BrianO'Keefe) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 13:58:53 -0600 Subject: [Shotwell] movieplayer? Message-ID: <508EDFFD.5070800@cybermesa.com> Any ideas on my post of a couple of days ago re: not being able to play videos by Shotwell opening Totem movie player? From joseph.bylund at gmail.com Mon Oct 29 20:30:53 2012 From: joseph.bylund at gmail.com (Joseph Bylund) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 16:30:53 -0400 Subject: [Shotwell] upgrader depends on dconf but it's not a dependency Message-ID: <508EE77D.4000607@gmail.com> I just put the most recent git version on a machine, and saw that the upgrade script uses dconf, but configure doesn't check for its presence. Maybe add a dependency? -Joe From clanlaw at googlemail.com Mon Oct 29 20:34:51 2012 From: clanlaw at googlemail.com (Colin Law) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 20:34:51 +0000 Subject: [Shotwell] Yorba PPA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On 29 October 2012 17:51, Thomas Novin wrote: > Hello > > Can you please add support for Quantal/12.10? I was just thinking myself that that would be very useful. We are still waiting for 13.1 for 12.10 to come through the normal route whereas my other machine running 12.04 has 13.1 from the ppa. Colin From joseph.bylund at gmail.com Mon Oct 29 20:39:47 2012 From: joseph.bylund at gmail.com (Joseph Bylund) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 16:39:47 -0400 Subject: [Shotwell] on the topic of dependencies In-Reply-To: <508EE77D.4000607@gmail.com> References: <508EE77D.4000607@gmail.com> Message-ID: <508EE993.4090307@gmail.com> Also, initially setting up the flickr publishing plugin requires xdg-open which lives in the xdg-utils package on my distro, so maybe that should be added as a dependency as well? -Joe From onefiftyfour at hotmail.com Mon Oct 29 20:50:45 2012 From: onefiftyfour at hotmail.com (Eric L) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 15:50:45 -0500 Subject: [Shotwell] movieplayer? In-Reply-To: <508EDFFD.5070800@cybermesa.com> References: <508EDFFD.5070800@cybermesa.com> Message-ID: Are you on Fedora? My recommendation is to install gnome-mplayer: sudo yum install gnome-mplayer Then, with your file browser, find one of your videos, right click and choose properties, click on the "Open with" tab, then click on Gnome Mplayer, then click on "Set as default" After that you should be able to play your videos from shotwell. Also, you might want to install gstreamer-ffmpeg: sudo yum install gstreamer-ffmpeg This will put thumbnails on your shotwell videos. -Eric > Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 13:58:53 -0600 > From: okeefe at cybermesa.com > To: shotwell at lists.yorba.org > Subject: [Shotwell] movieplayer? > > Any ideas on my post of a couple of days ago re: not being able to play > videos by Shotwell opening Totem movie player? > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From jim at yorba.org Tue Oct 30 13:27:23 2012 From: jim at yorba.org (Jim Nelson) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 13:28:23 +0001 Subject: [Shotwell] movieplayer? In-Reply-To: References: <508EDFFD.5070800@cybermesa.com> Message-ID: <508fd5be.4f9bcc0a.5755.56c5@mx.google.com> You might check this out: http://askubuntu.com/questions/34260/why-do-i-get-a-the-location-is-not-a-folder-error-when-trying-to-open-files-us More generally, I suspect that AVI files have somehow become associated to Nautilus (or your file manager) rather than Totem. -- Jim On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Eric L wrote: Are you on Fedora? My recommendation is to install gnome-mplayer: sudo yum install gnome-mplayer Then, with your file browser, find one of your videos, right click and choose properties, click on the "Open with" tab, then click on Gnome Mplayer, then click on "Set as default" After that you should be able to play your videos from shotwell. Also, you might want to install gstreamer-ffmpeg: sudo yum install gstreamer-ffmpeg This will put thumbnails on your shotwell videos. -Eric > Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 13:58:53 -0600 > From: okeefe at cybermesa.com > To: shotwell at lists.yorba.org > Subject: [Shotwell] movieplayer? > > Any ideas on my post of a couple of days ago re: not being able to play > videos by Shotwell opening Totem movie player? > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell _______________________________________________ Shotwell mailing list Shotwell at lists.yorba.org http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From jim at yorba.org Tue Oct 30 13:28:51 2012 From: jim at yorba.org (Jim Nelson) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 13:29:51 +0001 Subject: [Shotwell] Yorba PPA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <508fd615.1893cc0a.35e4.5a57@mx.google.com> We're working with Ubuntu to get 0.13.1 packaged and distributed with Quantal. ?Please hang on while we work out this issue. -- Jim On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Colin Law wrote: On 29 October 2012 17:51, Thomas Novin wrote: > Hello > > Can you please add support for Quantal/12.10? I was just thinking myself that that would be very useful. We are still waiting for 13.1 for 12.10 to come through the normal route whereas my other machine running 12.04 has 13.1 from the ppa. Colin _______________________________________________ Shotwell mailing list Shotwell at lists.yorba.org http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From lucas at yorba.org Tue Oct 30 13:30:11 2012 From: lucas at yorba.org (Lucas Beeler) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:30:11 +0100 Subject: [Shotwell] upgrader depends on dconf but it's not a dependency In-Reply-To: <508EE77D.4000607@gmail.com> References: <508EE77D.4000607@gmail.com> Message-ID: Hi Joseph, Yorba custom is to include only build-time dependencies in the configure script; run-time dependencies should be taken care of by your distro's packaging system. We assume that advanced users such as yourself who are building from git master won't have any real difficulty installing any runtime dependencies that are absent. What's more, xdg-utils and the dconf command-line tools are installed by default on most major distros. I really appreciate the suggestion but I don't think we'll be opening a ticket for this right now. Take care, Lucas On Oct 29, 2012, at 9:30 PM, Joseph Bylund wrote: > I just put the most recent git version on a machine, and saw that the upgrade script uses dconf, but configure doesn't check for its presence. Maybe add a dependency? > -Joe > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell From lucas at yorba.org Tue Oct 30 13:50:56 2012 From: lucas at yorba.org (Lucas Beeler) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:50:56 +0100 Subject: [Shotwell] Shotwell has problems after thumbnails have been deleted on disk In-Reply-To: <008401cdb5d0$55699420$003cbc60$@gmail.com> References: <50886B24.8030509@gmail.com> <508ABF8C.2060901@gmail.com> <508B73E7.4050605@iinet.com.au> <008401cdb5d0$55699420$003cbc60$@gmail.com> Message-ID: <19B96D54-5F09-4EF0-9DD3-012AB33B2C2A@yorba.org> > It seems that this problem exists for other users too. > So I'll create a bug report for it. By all means file a bug report for this issue! Take care, Lucas From lucas at yorba.org Tue Oct 30 13:59:49 2012 From: lucas at yorba.org (Lucas Beeler) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:59:49 +0100 Subject: [Shotwell] Multiply Selected Enhance no longer works In-Reply-To: References: <50875B80.8050800@gmail.com> Message-ID: Hi Thomas, >> Furthermore, a few general questions: first, are you running with >> library monitoring turned on (i.e. the "Watch library directory for >> new files" option in the Preferences dialog is checked)? > Yes Does the problem still occur if you disable library monitoring? Cheers, Lucas From mweisshaupt1988 at googlemail.com Tue Oct 30 21:45:30 2012 From: mweisshaupt1988 at googlemail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Martin_Wei=DFhaupt?=) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 22:45:30 +0100 Subject: [Shotwell] Shotwell has problems after thumbnails have been deleted on disk In-Reply-To: <19B96D54-5F09-4EF0-9DD3-012AB33B2C2A@yorba.org> References: <50886B24.8030509@gmail.com> <508ABF8C.2060901@gmail.com> <508B73E7.4050605@iinet.com.au> <008401cdb5d0$55699420$003cbc60$@gmail.com> <19B96D54-5F09-4EF0-9DD3-012AB33B2C2A@yorba.org> Message-ID: <50904A7A.2090500@gmail.com> Am 30.10.2012 14:50, schrieb Lucas Beeler: >> It seems that this problem exists for other users too. >> So I'll create a bug report for it. > By all means file a bug report for this issue! > > Take care, > Lucas Sorry but I was unable to login. I needed to create a new account for this... From okeefe at cybermesa.com Wed Oct 31 00:21:57 2012 From: okeefe at cybermesa.com (BrianO'Keefe) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 18:21:57 -0600 Subject: [Shotwell] Shotwell Digest, Vol 39, Issue 18 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <50906F25.4000609@cybermesa.com> Thanks to Eric and Jim. Turned out to be Jim's suggestion and an xfce package that was laying about that was messing up my file associations. Also no playing with DragonPlayer as it is the only player that has video at this time, for some unknown reason. Thanks again, Brian On 10/30/2012 01:00 PM, shotwell-request at lists.yorba.org wrote: > Send Shotwell mailing list submissions to > shotwell at lists.yorba.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > shotwell-request at lists.yorba.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > shotwell-owner at lists.yorba.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Shotwell digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. movieplayer? (BrianO'Keefe) > 2. upgrader depends on dconf but it's not a dependency > (Joseph Bylund) > 3. Re: Yorba PPA (Colin Law) > 4. on the topic of dependencies (Joseph Bylund) > 5. Re: movieplayer? (Eric L) > 6. Re: movieplayer? (Jim Nelson) > 7. Re: Yorba PPA (Jim Nelson) > 8. Re: upgrader depends on dconf but it's not a dependency > (Lucas Beeler) > 9. Re: Shotwell has problems after thumbnails have been deleted > on disk (Lucas Beeler) > 10. Re: Multiply Selected Enhance no longer works (Lucas Beeler) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 13:58:53 -0600 > From: BrianO'Keefe > To: shotwell at lists.yorba.org > Subject: [Shotwell] movieplayer? > Message-ID: <508EDFFD.5070800 at cybermesa.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Any ideas on my post of a couple of days ago re: not being able to play > videos by Shotwell opening Totem movie player? > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 16:30:53 -0400 > From: Joseph Bylund > To: shotwell at lists.yorba.org > Subject: [Shotwell] upgrader depends on dconf but it's not a > dependency > Message-ID: <508EE77D.4000607 at gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > I just put the most recent git version on a machine, and saw that the > upgrade script uses dconf, but configure doesn't check for its > presence. Maybe add a dependency? > -Joe > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 20:34:51 +0000 > From: Colin Law > To: Thomas Novin > Cc: shotwell > Subject: Re: [Shotwell] Yorba PPA > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > On 29 October 2012 17:51, Thomas Novin wrote: >> Hello >> >> Can you please add support for Quantal/12.10? > I was just thinking myself that that would be very useful. We are > still waiting for 13.1 for 12.10 to come through the normal route > whereas my other machine running 12.04 has 13.1 from the ppa. > > Colin > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 16:39:47 -0400 > From: Joseph Bylund > To: shotwell at lists.yorba.org > Subject: [Shotwell] on the topic of dependencies > Message-ID: <508EE993.4090307 at gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Also, initially setting up the flickr publishing plugin requires > xdg-open which lives in the xdg-utils package on my distro, so maybe > that should be added as a dependency as well? > -Joe > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 15:50:45 -0500 > From: Eric L > To: shotwell list > Subject: Re: [Shotwell] movieplayer? > Message-ID: > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > > Are you on Fedora? > My recommendation is to install gnome-mplayer: > sudo yum install gnome-mplayer > Then, with your file browser, find one of your videos, right click and choose properties, click on the "Open with" tab, then click on Gnome Mplayer, then click on "Set as default" > After that you should be able to play your videos from shotwell. > Also, you might want to install gstreamer-ffmpeg: > sudo yum install gstreamer-ffmpeg > This will put thumbnails on your shotwell videos. > -Eric > > >> Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 13:58:53 -0600 >> From: okeefe at cybermesa.com >> To: shotwell at lists.yorba.org >> Subject: [Shotwell] movieplayer? >> >> Any ideas on my post of a couple of days ago re: not being able to play >> videos by Shotwell opening Totem movie player? >> _______________________________________________ >> Shotwell mailing list >> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 13:28:23 +0001 > From: Jim Nelson > To: Eric L > Cc: shotwell list > Subject: Re: [Shotwell] movieplayer? > Message-ID: <508fd5be.4f9bcc0a.5755.56c5 at mx.google.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > You might check this out: > > http://askubuntu.com/questions/34260/why-do-i-get-a-the-location-is-not-a-folder-error-when-trying-to-open-files-us > > More generally, I suspect that AVI files have somehow become associated to Nautilus (or your file manager) rather than Totem. > > -- Jim > > On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Eric L wrote: > > Are you on Fedora? > My recommendation is to install gnome-mplayer: > sudo yum install gnome-mplayer > Then, with your file browser, find one of your videos, right click and choose properties, click on the "Open with" tab, then click on Gnome Mplayer, then click on "Set as default" > After that you should be able to play your videos from shotwell. > Also, you might want to install gstreamer-ffmpeg: > sudo yum install gstreamer-ffmpeg > This will put thumbnails on your shotwell videos. > -Eric > > >> Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 13:58:53 -0600 >> From: okeefe at cybermesa.com >> To: shotwell at lists.yorba.org >> Subject: [Shotwell] movieplayer? >> >> Any ideas on my post of a couple of days ago re: not being able to play >> videos by Shotwell opening Totem movie player? >> _______________________________________________ >> Shotwell mailing list >> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 13:29:51 +0001 > From: Jim Nelson > To: Colin Law > Cc: shotwell > Subject: Re: [Shotwell] Yorba PPA > Message-ID: <508fd615.1893cc0a.35e4.5a57 at mx.google.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > We're working with Ubuntu to get 0.13.1 packaged and distributed with Quantal. ?Please hang on while we work out this issue. > > -- Jim > > On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Colin Law wrote: > On 29 October 2012 17:51, Thomas Novin wrote: >> Hello >> >> Can you please add support for Quantal/12.10? > I was just thinking myself that that would be very useful. We are > still waiting for 13.1 for 12.10 to come through the normal route > whereas my other machine running 12.04 has 13.1 from the ppa. > > Colin > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 8 > Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:30:11 +0100 > From: Lucas Beeler > To: Joseph Bylund > Cc: shotwell at lists.yorba.org > Subject: Re: [Shotwell] upgrader depends on dconf but it's not a > dependency > Message-ID: > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Hi Joseph, > > Yorba custom is to include only build-time dependencies in the configure script; run-time dependencies should be taken care of by your distro's packaging system. We assume that advanced users such as yourself who are building from git master won't have any real difficulty installing any runtime dependencies that are absent. What's more, xdg-utils and the dconf command-line tools are installed by default on most major distros. I really appreciate the suggestion but I don't think we'll be opening a ticket for this right now. > > Take care, > Lucas > > On Oct 29, 2012, at 9:30 PM, Joseph Bylund wrote: > >> I just put the most recent git version on a machine, and saw that the upgrade script uses dconf, but configure doesn't check for its presence. Maybe add a dependency? >> -Joe >> _______________________________________________ >> Shotwell mailing list >> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 9 > Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:50:56 +0100 > From: Lucas Beeler > To: Martin Wei?haupt > Cc: shotwell at lists.yorba.org > Subject: Re: [Shotwell] Shotwell has problems after thumbnails have > been deleted on disk > Message-ID: <19B96D54-5F09-4EF0-9DD3-012AB33B2C2A at yorba.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > >> It seems that this problem exists for other users too. >> So I'll create a bug report for it. > By all means file a bug report for this issue! > > Take care, > Lucas > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 10 > Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:59:49 +0100 > From: Lucas Beeler > To: Thomas Novin > Cc: shotwell at lists.yorba.org > Subject: Re: [Shotwell] Multiply Selected Enhance no longer works > Message-ID: > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > > Hi Thomas, > >>> Furthermore, a few general questions: first, are you running with >>> library monitoring turned on (i.e. the "Watch library directory for >>> new files" option in the Preferences dialog is checked)? >> Yes > Does the problem still occur if you disable library monitoring? > > Cheers, > Lucas > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > > > End of Shotwell Digest, Vol 39, Issue 18 > **************************************** > > From okeefe at cybermesa.com Wed Oct 31 00:22:51 2012 From: okeefe at cybermesa.com (BrianO'Keefe) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 18:22:51 -0600 Subject: [Shotwell] movieplayer not opening video files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <50906F5B.4060704@cybermesa.com> Thanks to Eric and Jim. Turned out to be Jim's suggestion and an xfce package that was laying about that was messing up my file associations. Also no playing with DragonPlayer as it is the only player that has video at this time, for some unknown reason. Thanks again, Brian On 10/30/2012 01:00 PM, shotwell-request at lists.yorba.org wrote: > Send Shotwell mailing list submissions to > shotwell at lists.yorba.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > shotwell-request at lists.yorba.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > shotwell-owner at lists.yorba.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Shotwell digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. movieplayer? (BrianO'Keefe) > 2. upgrader depends on dconf but it's not a dependency > (Joseph Bylund) > 3. Re: Yorba PPA (Colin Law) > 4. on the topic of dependencies (Joseph Bylund) > 5. Re: movieplayer? (Eric L) > 6. Re: movieplayer? (Jim Nelson) > 7. Re: Yorba PPA (Jim Nelson) > 8. Re: upgrader depends on dconf but it's not a dependency > (Lucas Beeler) > 9. Re: Shotwell has problems after thumbnails have been deleted > on disk (Lucas Beeler) > 10. Re: Multiply Selected Enhance no longer works (Lucas Beeler) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 13:58:53 -0600 > From: BrianO'Keefe > To: shotwell at lists.yorba.org > Subject: [Shotwell] movieplayer? > Message-ID: <508EDFFD.5070800 at cybermesa.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Any ideas on my post of a couple of days ago re: not being able to play > videos by Shotwell opening Totem movie player? > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 16:30:53 -0400 > From: Joseph Bylund > To: shotwell at lists.yorba.org > Subject: [Shotwell] upgrader depends on dconf but it's not a > dependency > Message-ID: <508EE77D.4000607 at gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > I just put the most recent git version on a machine, and saw that the > upgrade script uses dconf, but configure doesn't check for its > presence. Maybe add a dependency? > -Joe > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 20:34:51 +0000 > From: Colin Law > To: Thomas Novin > Cc: shotwell > Subject: Re: [Shotwell] Yorba PPA > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > On 29 October 2012 17:51, Thomas Novin wrote: >> Hello >> >> Can you please add support for Quantal/12.10? > I was just thinking myself that that would be very useful. We are > still waiting for 13.1 for 12.10 to come through the normal route > whereas my other machine running 12.04 has 13.1 from the ppa. > > Colin > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 16:39:47 -0400 > From: Joseph Bylund > To: shotwell at lists.yorba.org > Subject: [Shotwell] on the topic of dependencies > Message-ID: <508EE993.4090307 at gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Also, initially setting up the flickr publishing plugin requires > xdg-open which lives in the xdg-utils package on my distro, so maybe > that should be added as a dependency as well? > -Joe > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 15:50:45 -0500 > From: Eric L > To: shotwell list > Subject: Re: [Shotwell] movieplayer? > Message-ID: > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > > Are you on Fedora? > My recommendation is to install gnome-mplayer: > sudo yum install gnome-mplayer > Then, with your file browser, find one of your videos, right click and choose properties, click on the "Open with" tab, then click on Gnome Mplayer, then click on "Set as default" > After that you should be able to play your videos from shotwell. > Also, you might want to install gstreamer-ffmpeg: > sudo yum install gstreamer-ffmpeg > This will put thumbnails on your shotwell videos. > -Eric > > >> Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 13:58:53 -0600 >> From: okeefe at cybermesa.com >> To: shotwell at lists.yorba.org >> Subject: [Shotwell] movieplayer? >> >> Any ideas on my post of a couple of days ago re: not being able to play >> videos by Shotwell opening Totem movie player? >> _______________________________________________ >> Shotwell mailing list >> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 13:28:23 +0001 > From: Jim Nelson > To: Eric L > Cc: shotwell list > Subject: Re: [Shotwell] movieplayer? > Message-ID: <508fd5be.4f9bcc0a.5755.56c5 at mx.google.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > You might check this out: > > http://askubuntu.com/questions/34260/why-do-i-get-a-the-location-is-not-a-folder-error-when-trying-to-open-files-us > > More generally, I suspect that AVI files have somehow become associated to Nautilus (or your file manager) rather than Totem. > > -- Jim > > On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Eric L wrote: > > Are you on Fedora? > My recommendation is to install gnome-mplayer: > sudo yum install gnome-mplayer > Then, with your file browser, find one of your videos, right click and choose properties, click on the "Open with" tab, then click on Gnome Mplayer, then click on "Set as default" > After that you should be able to play your videos from shotwell. > Also, you might want to install gstreamer-ffmpeg: > sudo yum install gstreamer-ffmpeg > This will put thumbnails on your shotwell videos. > -Eric > > >> Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 13:58:53 -0600 >> From: okeefe at cybermesa.com >> To: shotwell at lists.yorba.org >> Subject: [Shotwell] movieplayer? >> >> Any ideas on my post of a couple of days ago re: not being able to play >> videos by Shotwell opening Totem movie player? >> _______________________________________________ >> Shotwell mailing list >> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 13:29:51 +0001 > From: Jim Nelson > To: Colin Law > Cc: shotwell > Subject: Re: [Shotwell] Yorba PPA > Message-ID: <508fd615.1893cc0a.35e4.5a57 at mx.google.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > We're working with Ubuntu to get 0.13.1 packaged and distributed with Quantal. ?Please hang on while we work out this issue. > > -- Jim > > On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Colin Law wrote: > On 29 October 2012 17:51, Thomas Novin wrote: >> Hello >> >> Can you please add support for Quantal/12.10? > I was just thinking myself that that would be very useful. We are > still waiting for 13.1 for 12.10 to come through the normal route > whereas my other machine running 12.04 has 13.1 from the ppa. > > Colin > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 8 > Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:30:11 +0100 > From: Lucas Beeler > To: Joseph Bylund > Cc: shotwell at lists.yorba.org > Subject: Re: [Shotwell] upgrader depends on dconf but it's not a > dependency > Message-ID: > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Hi Joseph, > > Yorba custom is to include only build-time dependencies in the configure script; run-time dependencies should be taken care of by your distro's packaging system. We assume that advanced users such as yourself who are building from git master won't have any real difficulty installing any runtime dependencies that are absent. What's more, xdg-utils and the dconf command-line tools are installed by default on most major distros. I really appreciate the suggestion but I don't think we'll be opening a ticket for this right now. > > Take care, > Lucas > > On Oct 29, 2012, at 9:30 PM, Joseph Bylund wrote: > >> I just put the most recent git version on a machine, and saw that the upgrade script uses dconf, but configure doesn't check for its presence. Maybe add a dependency? >> -Joe >> _______________________________________________ >> Shotwell mailing list >> Shotwell at lists.yorba.org >> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 9 > Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:50:56 +0100 > From: Lucas Beeler > To: Martin Wei?haupt > Cc: shotwell at lists.yorba.org > Subject: Re: [Shotwell] Shotwell has problems after thumbnails have > been deleted on disk > Message-ID: <19B96D54-5F09-4EF0-9DD3-012AB33B2C2A at yorba.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > >> It seems that this problem exists for other users too. >> So I'll create a bug report for it. > By all means file a bug report for this issue! > > Take care, > Lucas > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 10 > Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:59:49 +0100 > From: Lucas Beeler > To: Thomas Novin > Cc: shotwell at lists.yorba.org > Subject: Re: [Shotwell] Multiply Selected Enhance no longer works > Message-ID: > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > > Hi Thomas, > >>> Furthermore, a few general questions: first, are you running with >>> library monitoring turned on (i.e. the "Watch library directory for >>> new files" option in the Preferences dialog is checked)? >> Yes > Does the problem still occur if you disable library monitoring? > > Cheers, > Lucas > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > > > End of Shotwell Digest, Vol 39, Issue 18 > **************************************** > >