[Shotwell] shotwell with 100k pics: somewhere between quite fast and too slow
oliver
oliver at first.in-berlin.de
Sun Aug 14 14:28:38 UTC 2011
Hi Andreas,
I have not to add "-X -pg" in VALAFLAGS.
This does not really provide the "-pg" to the C-compiler.
Instead it must be used the following:
"-pg" added to VALA_CFLAGS
Ciao,
Oliver
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 01:57:35PM +0200, Andreas Brauchli wrote:
> hi oliver
>
> what you want is probably not a debug version but a
> profilable version. btw, it looks like the debug flag (-g) is passed by
> default - at least if the packager didn't turn it off.
>
> for profiling you can use gprof to do the job by passing -X -pg to valac
> (VALAFLAGS in Makefile)
>
> however if you're not comfortable with c programming i would not advise
> you to do so.. not that you could break much but it could be
> frustrating ;) at least you'd need to read up on how to use gprof
>
> cheers and best of luck
> andreas
>
> On Sam, 2011-08-13 at 13:33 +0200, oliver wrote:
> > If it is possible to create a gdb-/debugging-version
> > of shotwell, and if this is easy by just adding
> > a switch to one makefile, I could try the same
> > procedure again, so that the bottleneck maybe
> > can be identified.
> >
> > Is there an easy way for this?
> >
> > How would I make a debugging version from shotwell?
> >
> > (Or are those issues already addressed by the shotwell team?
> > Or is being able to handle about 100k pics not in the focus
> > of the shotwell team?)
> >
> >
> > Ciao,
> > Oliver
> > _______________________________________________
> > Shotwell mailing list
> > Shotwell at lists.yorba.org
> > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell
>
>
More information about the Shotwell-list
mailing list