Re: C++11: GLIBMM_INITIALIZE_STRUCT

[Kjell Ahlstedt <kjell ahlstedt bredband net>]

2013-07-09 11:02, Murray Cumming skrev:
> On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 15:54 +0200, Kjell Ahlstedt wrote:
> > Do we really need GLIBMM_INITIALIZE_STRUCT?
> It seems to be used in all boxed-type wrappers, but there are not so
> many of them.
>
> >   There are 3 uses in glibmm and 6 in gtkmm. They can easily be
> > replaced by std::memset().
> Would you like to try that?
I had not noticed that most occurrences of GLIBMM_INITIALIZE_STRUCT are 
in code generated by gmmproc.

I have just pushed a patch that replaces GLIBMM_INITIALIZE_STRUCT by 
std::memset() in the code generated by _CLASS_BOXEDTYPE_STATIC, and in 
other glibmm code.
All GLIBMM_INITIALIZE_STRUCTs in gtkmm and other packages that I've 
checked come from _CLASS_BOXEDTYPE_STATIC. They will disappear when the 
code is regenerated with an updated versioin of gmmproc.