Re: gtkmm 3.0 and libsigc++



On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 08:37 -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> 
> but to stress again: the key decision was to just leave sigc++ alone
> in connection with gtkmm, which was easy for us since we already use
> the "no GUI code in another thread" model. 

(I haven't read the whole thread yet)

But this libsigc++ issue is still an issue with gtkmm, right?

-- 
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]