Re: verbose exception

[Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>]

On Sun, 2006-10-15 at 23:28 +0200, Thomas Metz wrote:
> > What would the patch look like? Is this simply a new class, or does it
> > change existing API?
> Just a new class. the goal is not to change the existing API.
> At the moment it is not really a patch, just an independant class.
> 
> > If it's just a new class, I don't understand why it needs to be in
> > glibmm.
> Because, when I searched this feature, I expected to find it in glibmm (just a 
> personnal feeling).
> But OK, if you think that such mechanism is useless to be provided by glibmm,
> you have (obviously) a better idea than me of what glibmm shall be. 

Yes, glibmm is not a bundle. It's meant to be a wrapper for glib.

You should really start a google code or sourceforge project for your
new API.

> > If it changes existing API then it can't be allowed.
> This is a good rule !

-- 
Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com