Re: virtual signal system ?

[Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>]

On Sat, 2006-11-11 at 00:35 +0100, Bo Lorentsen wrote:
[snip]
> The gain from this model would be better performance (not a lot of 
> unused virtual function), and lower memory footprint (no or very
> small 
> vtables).
> 
> Is this possible, or are the strong reasons not to do things like
> this ? 

I'm not aware of significant performance problems on regular desktop
PCs. For embedded hardware, this API is optional at build time.

Anyway, we would need a very good reason to do a
API-break-plus-parallel-install.

-- 
Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com