Gtkmm-forge digest, Vol 1 #1105 - 6 msgs



Send Gtkmm-forge mailing list submissions to
	gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	gtkmm-forge-request lists sourceforge net

You can reach the person managing the list at
	gtkmm-forge-admin lists sourceforge net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Gtkmm-forge digest..."


gtkmm-forge is the mailing list that receives gtkmm bug reports from bugzilla.  A daily digest is sent to gtkmm-main, to encourage people to help fixing the bugs. Do not try to unsubscribe gtkmm-forge from gtkmm-list.


Today's Topics:

   1. [Bug 338437] New: Gtk::Widget::signal_get_accessible: "get-accessible" - nonexistent signal? (gtkmm (bugzilla.gnome.org))
   2. [Bug 338437] Gtk::Widget::signal_get_accessible: "get-accessible" - nonexistent signal? (gtkmm (bugzilla.gnome.org))
   3. [Bug 338439] New: Gtk::FileChooser::signal_confirm_overwrite has wrong signature (gtkmm (bugzilla.gnome.org))
   4. [Bug 309030] Gtk::TreeModelColumn not imported properly on windows (gtkmm (bugzilla.gnome.org))
   5. [Bug 338439] Gtk::FileChooser::signal_confirm_overwrite has wrong signature (gtkmm (bugzilla.gnome.org))
   6. [Bug 338439] Gtk::FileChooser::signal_confirm_overwrite has wrong signature (gtkmm (bugzilla.gnome.org))

--__--__--

Message: 1
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
From: "gtkmm (bugzilla.gnome.org)" <bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 04:45:14 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 338437] New: Gtk::Widget::signal_get_accessible: "get-accessible" - nonexistent signal?

Do not reply to this via email (we are currently unable to handle email
responses and they get discarded).  You can add comments to this bug at
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D338437
 gtkmm | general | Ver: 2.8.x

           Summary: Gtk::Widget::signal_get_accessible: "get-accessible" =
-
                    nonexistent signal?
           Product: gtkmm
           Version: 2.8.x
          Platform: Other
        OS/Version: All
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: Normal
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
        ReportedBy: maxim udushlivy gmail com
         QAContact: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
     GNOME version: Unspecified
   GNOME milestone: Unspecified


Please describe the problem:
Gtk::Widget has signal_get_accessible method however GtkWidget object doe=
s not
define "get-accessible" signal.

Steps to reproduce:


Actual results:


Expected results:


Does this happen every time?


Other information:


--=20
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=3Demail
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.


--__--__--

Message: 2
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
From: "gtkmm (bugzilla.gnome.org)" <bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 04:48:50 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 338437] Gtk::Widget::signal_get_accessible: "get-accessible" - nonexistent signal?

Do not reply to this via email (we are currently unable to handle email
responses and they get discarded).  You can add comments to this bug at
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D338437
 gtkmm | general | Ver: 2.8.x





------- Comment #1 from Maxim Udushlivy  2006-04-14 08:48 UTC -------
P.S. Please make the function deprecated, do not remove it in order to sa=
ve
API/ABI (if it is a bug actually)


--=20
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=3Demail
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.


--__--__--

Message: 3
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
From: "gtkmm (bugzilla.gnome.org)" <bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 05:03:10 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 338439] New: Gtk::FileChooser::signal_confirm_overwrite has wrong signature

Do not reply to this via email (we are currently unable to handle email
responses and they get discarded).  You can add comments to this bug at
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D338439
 gtkmm | general | Ver: 2.8.x

           Summary: Gtk::FileChooser::signal_confirm_overwrite has wrong
                    signature
           Product: gtkmm
           Version: 2.8.x
          Platform: Other
        OS/Version: All
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: Normal
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
        ReportedBy: maxim udushlivy gmail com
         QAContact: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
     GNOME version: Unspecified
   GNOME milestone: Unspecified


Please describe the problem:
GtkFileChooser "confirm-overwrite" signal handler must return a
GtkFileChooserConfirmation value, however
Gtk::FileChooser::signal_confirm_overwrite requires a handler that takes
Gtk::FileChooserConfirmation as a parameter.

Steps to reproduce:


Actual results:


Expected results:


Does this happen every time?


Other information:


--=20
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=3Demail
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.


--__--__--

Message: 4
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
From: "gtkmm (bugzilla.gnome.org)" <bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 07:31:25 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 309030] Gtk::TreeModelColumn not imported properly on windows

Do not reply to this via email (we are currently unable to handle email
responses and they get discarded).  You can add comments to this bug at
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D309030
 gtkmm | TreeView | Ver: 2.6


Murray Cumming changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
---
             Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED




------- Comment #47 from Murray Cumming  2006-04-14 11:31 UTC -------
I have released new versions of glibmm 2.8, glibmm 2.10, and gtkmm 2.8. P=
lease
reopen this bug if they do not fix the problem.


--=20
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=3Demail
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.


--__--__--

Message: 5
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
From: "gtkmm (bugzilla.gnome.org)" <bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 07:46:16 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 338439] Gtk::FileChooser::signal_confirm_overwrite has wrong signature

Do not reply to this via email (we are currently unable to handle email
responses and they get discarded).  You can add comments to this bug at
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D338439
 gtkmm | general | Ver: 2.8.x


Murray Cumming changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
---
                 CC|                            |murrayc murrayc com




------- Comment #1 from Murray Cumming  2006-04-14 11:46 UTC -------
Yes, you are correct. I wonder whether we can change this without breakin=
g ABI
for this class. It's OK to break API for this one signal because the sign=
al
could never have worked.


--=20
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=3Demail
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.


--__--__--

Message: 6
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
From: "gtkmm (bugzilla.gnome.org)" <bugzilla-daemon bugzilla gnome org>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 10:13:56 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 338439] Gtk::FileChooser::signal_confirm_overwrite has wrong signature

Do not reply to this via email (we are currently unable to handle email
responses and they get discarded).  You can add comments to this bug at
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D338439
 gtkmm | general | Ver: 2.8.x





------- Comment #2 from Maxim Udushlivy  2006-04-14 14:13 UTC -------
Just found a couple of interesting articles at developer.kde.org:

http://developer.kde.org/documentation/other/binarycompatibility.html
http://developer.kde.org/policies/compatpolicy.html

This will certainly not break the ABI:
1. deprecate wrong signal_confirm_overwrite=20
2. add a new signal_* function with a different name (signal_confirmation=
 ?)
and map it to "confirm-overwrite" GTK+ signal (probably the same way as
signal_parent_changed ?)


--=20
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=3Demail
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.



--__--__--

_______________________________________________
Gtkmm-forge mailing list
Gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge


End of Gtkmm-forge Digest



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]