GNOME.org
 

[gtkmm] Gtkmm-forge digest, Vol 1 #391 - 12 msgs

Send Gtkmm-forge mailing list submissions to
	gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	gtkmm-forge-request lists sourceforge net

You can reach the person managing the list at
	gtkmm-forge-admin lists sourceforge net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Gtkmm-forge digest..."


gtkmm-forge is the mailing list that receives gtkmm bug reports from bugzilla.  A daily digest is sent to gtkmm-main, to encourage people to help fixing the bugs.


Today's Topics:

   1. [Bug 109826] Changed - new rpm spec file (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   2. [Bug 109832] Changed - Lines' points change without warning (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   3. [Bug 109828] Changed - rpm spec files (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   4. [Bug 107686] Changed - CanvasAA destructor (mem dealloc) bug (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   5. [Bug 109966] New - Dispatcher does not work on win32 (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   6. [Bug 109966] Changed - Dispatcher does not work on win32 (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   7. [Bug 109966] Changed - Dispatcher does not work on win32 (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   8. [Bug 109882] Changed - CH2 of the Gtkmm book does not include Windows installation (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
   9. [Bug 109882] Changed - CH2 of the Gtkmm book does not include Windows installation (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
  10. [Bug 109972] New - reference docs should explain properties. (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
  11. [Bug 109972] Changed - reference docs should explain properties. (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)
  12. [Bug 109882] Changed - CH2 of the Gtkmm book does not include Windows installation (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)

--__--__--

Message: 1
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, gbpeck sbcglobal net
Cc: 
Date: Fri,  4 Apr 2003 01:40:15 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 109826] Changed - new rpm spec file

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109826

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/109826	Thu Apr  3 17:57:35 2003
+++ shadow/109826.tmp.7964	Fri Apr  4 01:40:15 2003
@@ -55,6 +55,35 @@
 ./configure; make; make install.
 
 ------- Additional Comments From gbpeck sbcglobal net  2003-04-03 17:57 -------
 Created an attachment (id=15450)
 new spec file, Makefile fix, and ChangeLog additions in patch format
 
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-04-04 01:40 -------
+> Regarding the Makefile patch: the examples directory is not included
+> in SUBDIRS of any of the other gtkmm projects; 
+
+It will be. If you look a the ChangeLog you'll see that this is a
+recent change. Please don't change it back.
+
+> it adds significantly to the compile
+> time
+
+Which isn't very relevant to the issue of rpms.
+
+> and, most importantly, it doesn't always compile (at least in
+> 2.2.1),
+
+So report/fix the bugs.
+
+> which breaks rebuilds. I strongly suggest not shipping release
+> versions of packages which won't build cleanly with a simple
+> ./configure; make; make install.
+
+Again, fix/report bugs.
+
+This can not be applied yet. The Makefile.am patch has nothing to do
+with the rpm spec file. Also, you might consider using the version
+number variables (e.g. of glib) from configure.in, like in the .pc.in
+file. This would mean you don't have to keep changing the numbers
+manually.



--__--__--

Message: 2
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, glasse rpi edu
Cc: 
Date: Fri,  4 Apr 2003 01:45:49 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 109832] Changed - Lines' points change without warning

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109832

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/109832	Thu Apr  3 02:28:29 2003
+++ shadow/109832.tmp.11210	Fri Apr  4 01:45:49 2003
@@ -210,6 +210,10 @@
 -- Gnome::Art::Point -- the second endpoint. 
 (line->property_points().get_value()[0] remains (100, 100))
 line->property_points().get_value()[1].get_y() should be the y-coord
 of the second endpoint of the line.
 
 Which parts of the above are wrong?
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-04-04 01:45 -------
+I have not read this yet. In future, please _attach_ test cases so
+things remain readable.



--__--__--

Message: 3
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, gbpeck sbcglobal net
Cc: 
Date: Fri,  4 Apr 2003 01:45:04 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 109828] Changed - rpm spec files

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109828

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/109828	Thu Apr  3 18:07:23 2003
+++ shadow/109828.tmp.10841	Fri Apr  4 01:45:04 2003
@@ -69,6 +69,116 @@
 As far as the files being generated, I'm sorry about that. I should
 have attached .in versions of the files. However, the only difference
 is that the first line of each file would be:
 %define version		@VERSION@
 instead of what's currently there. I'd rather save everyone some
 bandwidth and not repost such a minor change.
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-04-04 01:45 -------
+> In the cases of gconfmm, libbonobomm, libbonobouimm, and
+> libglademm, there are no spec files in the distribution. So the full
+> file is equivalent to a patch.
+
+There should be. These should all be like gtkmm.
+
+> libgnomecanvasmm, libgnomemm, and libgnomeuimm include spec files
+> which are completely broken and from gnomemm 1.x (circa 2001). The
+> attached files should just replace what's currently there.
+
+No, they have spec.in files. Please provide patches.
+
+
+
+I'm attaching RPM spec files for gconfmm, libbonobomm, libbonobouimm,
+libglademm, libgnomecanvasmm, libgnomemm, and libgnomeuimm. These should
+work on at least RedHat 8 and 9 and probably on most RPM systems.
+
+
+
+
+------- Additional Comments From Gary Peck 2003-04-02 18:44 -------
+
+Created an attachment (id=15414)
+gconfmm spec file
+
+
+
+
+------- Additional Comments From Gary Peck 2003-04-02 18:45 -------
+
+Created an attachment (id=15415)
+libbonobomm spec file
+
+
+
+
+------- Additional Comments From Gary Peck 2003-04-02 18:45 -------
+
+Created an attachment (id=15417)
+libbonobouimm spec file
+
+
+
+
+------- Additional Comments From Gary Peck 2003-04-02 18:45 -------
+
+Created an attachment (id=15418)
+libglademm spec file
+
+
+
+
+------- Additional Comments From Gary Peck 2003-04-02 18:46 -------
+
+Created an attachment (id=15419)
+libgnomecanvasmm spec file
+
+
+
+
+------- Additional Comments From Gary Peck 2003-04-02 18:46 -------
+
+Created an attachment (id=15420)
+libgnomemm spec file
+
+
+
+
+------- Additional Comments From Gary Peck 2003-04-02 18:46 -------
+
+Created an attachment (id=15421)
+libgnomeuimm spec file
+
+
+
+
+------- Additional Comments From Murray Cumming 2003-04-03 01:17 -------
+
+As I said in the gtkmm bug, these are all generated files, and you 
+should be providing patches instead of whole files.
+
+
+
+
+------- Additional Comments From Gary Peck 2003-04-03 18:07 -------
+
+In the cases of gconfmm, libbonobomm, libbonobouimm, and
+libglademm, there are no spec files in the distribution. So the full
+file is equivalent to a patch.
+
+libgnomecanvasmm, libgnomemm, and libgnomeuimm include spec files
+which are completely broken and from gnomemm 1.x (circa 2001). The
+attached files should just replace what's currently there.
+
+> As far as the files being generated, I'm sorry about that. I should
+> have attached .in versions of the files. However, the only > difference
+> is that the first line of each file would be:
+> %define version		@VERSION@
+> instead of what's currently there. I'd rather save everyone some
+> bandwidth and not repost such a minor change.
+
+No, please save us time by providing patches that I can just mark as
+ready to apply.
+
+
+
+        



--__--__--

Message: 4
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, barbapapa myrealbox com
Cc: 
Date: Fri,  4 Apr 2003 01:46:16 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 107686] Changed - CanvasAA destructor (mem dealloc) bug

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107686

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/107686	Tue Mar 18 11:46:49 2003
+++ shadow/107686.tmp.11512	Fri Apr  4 01:46:16 2003
@@ -55,6 +55,9 @@
 Maybe it's something to do with this mysterious code in the constructor:
 http://cvs.gnome.org/lxr/source/gnomemm/libgnomecanvasmm/libgnomecanvas/src/canvas.ccg#49
 
 ------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-03-18 11:46 -------
 It might help to have an example in C that works. Then we could
 compare what the C example does and what libgnomecanvasmm does.
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-04-04 01:46 -------
+Could you try to write that C test case?



--__--__--

Message: 5
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Fri,  4 Apr 2003 06:46:57 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 109966] New - Dispatcher does not work on win32

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109966

Changed by cgustin ibelgique com 

--- shadow/109966	Fri Apr  4 06:46:57 2003
+++ shadow/109966.tmp.17308	Fri Apr  4 06:46:57 2003
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+Bug#: 109966
+Product: gtkmm
+Version: 2.2
+OS: Windows
+OS Details: 
+Status: NEW   
+Resolution: 
+Severity: normal
+Priority: Normal
+Component: general
+AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net                            
+ReportedBy: cgustin ibelgique com               
+TargetMilestone: ---
+URL: 
+Summary: Dispatcher does not work on win32
+
+Glib::Dispatcher builds fine on win32 using mingw32 but the 
+examples/thread/dispatcher and dispatcher2 examples do not work.



--__--__--

Message: 6
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Fri,  4 Apr 2003 06:52:32 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 109966] Changed - Dispatcher does not work on win32

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109966

Changed by cgustin ibelgique com 

--- shadow/109966	Fri Apr  4 06:51:48 2003
+++ shadow/109966.tmp.20155	Fri Apr  4 06:52:32 2003
@@ -20,6 +20,11 @@
 ------- Additional Comments From cgustin ibelgique com  2003-04-04 06:51 -------
 I received a workaround a few days ago from Andrew Makeev. I somewhat 
 rearranged the code and adapted it to the current CVS dispatcher.cc. 
 A patch is attached. The dispatcher examples now run fine.
 If somebody (Daniel ?) could have a look at it... I'm not a pipe/file 
 descriptor specialist ! If it's ok, I'll add a patched ChangeLog.
+
+------- Additional Comments From cgustin ibelgique com  2003-04-04 06:52 -------
+Created an attachment (id=15466)
+Dispatcher win32 patch
+



--__--__--

Message: 7
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Fri,  4 Apr 2003 06:51:48 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 109966] Changed - Dispatcher does not work on win32

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109966

Changed by cgustin ibelgique com 

--- shadow/109966	Fri Apr  4 06:46:57 2003
+++ shadow/109966.tmp.19822	Fri Apr  4 06:51:48 2003
@@ -13,6 +13,13 @@
 TargetMilestone: ---
 URL: 
 Summary: Dispatcher does not work on win32
 
 Glib::Dispatcher builds fine on win32 using mingw32 but the 
 examples/thread/dispatcher and dispatcher2 examples do not work.
+
+------- Additional Comments From cgustin ibelgique com  2003-04-04 06:51 -------
+I received a workaround a few days ago from Andrew Makeev. I somewhat 
+rearranged the code and adapted it to the current CVS dispatcher.cc. 
+A patch is attached. The dispatcher examples now run fine.
+If somebody (Daniel ?) could have a look at it... I'm not a pipe/file 
+descriptor specialist ! If it's ok, I'll add a patched ChangeLog.



--__--__--

Message: 8
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, gene erachampion com
Cc: 
Date: Fri,  4 Apr 2003 07:03:57 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 109882] Changed - CH2 of the Gtkmm book does not include Windows installation

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109882

Changed by cgustin ibelgique com 

--- shadow/109882	Thu Apr  3 11:31:56 2003
+++ shadow/109882.tmp.25439	Fri Apr  4 07:03:57 2003
@@ -23,6 +23,15 @@
 
 The windows installation instructions should probably describe how to 
 install Gtkmm 2.x from the various binaries provided, rather than going 
 into details of compiling sources.  
 
 I'll try and have an initial patch for this by this weekend.
+
+------- Additional Comments From cgustin ibelgique com  2003-04-04 07:03 -------
+Gene, did you have a look at the modified xml file I sent you last 
+week ? Do you think this win32 stuff should be included into the 
+gtkmm book or should it be a separate file (like the FAQ) referenced 
+from the gtkmm main index.html ?
+
+By the way, I think this bug should be reattributed to version 2.2 
+(instead of 2.0) of gtkmm.



--__--__--

Message: 9
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, gene erachampion com
Cc: 
Date: Fri,  4 Apr 2003 08:13:47 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 109882] Changed - CH2 of the Gtkmm book does not include Windows installation

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109882

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/109882	Fri Apr  4 07:03:57 2003
+++ shadow/109882.tmp.26198	Fri Apr  4 08:13:47 2003
@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
 Bug#: 109882
 Product: gtkmm
-Version: 2.0
+Version: 2.2
 OS: Windows
 OS Details: 
 Status: NEW   
 Resolution: 
 Severity: minor
 Priority: Normal
@@ -32,6 +32,10 @@
 week ? Do you think this win32 stuff should be included into the 
 gtkmm book or should it be a separate file (like the FAQ) referenced 
 from the gtkmm main index.html ?
 
 By the way, I think this bug should be reattributed to version 2.2 
 (instead of 2.0) of gtkmm.
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-04-04 08:13 -------
+DO try to post patches here rather than to each other. That stops
+things from getting lost.



--__--__--

Message: 10
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Fri,  4 Apr 2003 09:25:28 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 109972] New - reference docs should explain properties.

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109972

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/109972	Fri Apr  4 09:25:28 2003
+++ shadow/109972.tmp.2753	Fri Apr  4 09:25:28 2003
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+Bug#: 109972
+Product: gtkmm
+Version: 2.2
+OS: Windows
+OS Details: 
+Status: NEW   
+Resolution: 
+Severity: normal
+Priority: Normal
+Component: reference documentation
+AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net                            
+ReportedBy: murrayc usa net               
+QAContact: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
+TargetMilestone: ---
+URL: 
+Summary: reference docs should explain properties.
+
+Apart from Gtk::CellRenderer, and Gtk::TextBuffer::Tag, nobody really needs
+to use properties directly. So we should probably add some standard text
+(or a URL) about that to the reference docs for every property.



--__--__--

Message: 11
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Fri,  4 Apr 2003 09:32:03 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 109972] Changed - reference docs should explain properties.

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109972

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/109972	Fri Apr  4 09:25:28 2003
+++ shadow/109972.tmp.6701	Fri Apr  4 09:32:03 2003
@@ -15,6 +15,11 @@
 URL: 
 Summary: reference docs should explain properties.
 
 Apart from Gtk::CellRenderer, and Gtk::TextBuffer::Tag, nobody really needs
 to use properties directly. So we should probably add some standard text
 (or a URL) about that to the reference docs for every property.
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-04-04 09:32 -------
+And while we're at it, let's add some text to each and every gobj()
+method to raise the % of documented methods. People seem to like that
+even for stuff that doesn't need it.



--__--__--

Message: 12
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
Cc: 
Date: Fri,  4 Apr 2003 11:47:18 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 109882] Changed - CH2 of the Gtkmm book does not include Windows installation

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109882

Changed by gene erachampion com 

--- shadow/109882	Fri Apr  4 08:13:47 2003
+++ shadow/109882.tmp.16588	Fri Apr  4 11:47:18 2003
@@ -36,6 +36,13 @@
 By the way, I think this bug should be reattributed to version 2.2 
 (instead of 2.0) of gtkmm.
 
 ------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2003-04-04 08:13 -------
 DO try to post patches here rather than to each other. That stops
 things from getting lost.
+
+------- Additional Comments From gene erachampion com  2003-04-04 11:47 -------
+Cedric, 
+I did not recieve your e-mail.  Would you please post it here so that 
+I can add my changes and submit a final patch this weekend?
+
+Thank You!




--__--__--

_______________________________________________
Gtkmm-forge mailing list
Gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge


End of Gtkmm-forge Digest
[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]