[gtkmm] Gtkmm-forge digest, Vol 1 #265 - 1 msg

[gtkmm-forge-request lists sourceforge net]

Send Gtkmm-forge mailing list submissions to
	gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	gtkmm-forge-request lists sourceforge net

You can reach the person managing the list at
	gtkmm-forge-admin lists sourceforge net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Gtkmm-forge digest..."


gtkmm-forge is the mailing list that receives gtkmm bug reports from bugzilla.  A daily digest is sent to gtkmm-main, to encourage people to help fixing the bugs.


Today's Topics:

   1. [Bug 90126] Changed - Box::pack_start() is not very typesafe. (bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org)

--__--__--

Message: 1
From: bugzilla-daemon widget gnome org
To: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net, szombath bifab de
Cc: 
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 16:04:33 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 90126] Changed - Box::pack_start() is not very typesafe.

Please do not reply to this email- if you want to comment on the bug, go to the
URL shown below and enter your comments there.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90126

Changed by murrayc usa net 

--- shadow/90126	Sat Oct 26 14:44:39 2002
+++ shadow/90126.tmp.2289	Sat Oct 26 16:04:33 2002
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
 Bug#: 90126
 Product: gtkmm
 Version: 2.0
 OS: All
 OS Details: 
-Status: RESOLVED   
-Resolution: FIXED
+Status: REOPENED   
+Resolution: 
 Severity: normal
 Priority: Normal
 Component: build
 AssignedTo: gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net                            
 ReportedBy: szombath bifab de               
 TargetMilestone: 3
@@ -442,6 +442,12 @@
 Dukat and Matthew Walton, so it seems we've a broad agreement on this
 issue.
 
 I'm closing this bug now since the overloading ambiguity is solved for
 the most common case, i.e. when not using the padding argument.
 
+
+------- Additional Comments From murrayc usa net  2002-10-26 16:04 -------
+On 2nd thoughts, this comment seems like a good reason not to do it:
+
+>> People who have never used Gtk::SHRINK, Gtk::FILL, etc, will have no
+>> problem with the current API?




--__--__--

_______________________________________________
Gtkmm-forge mailing list
Gtkmm-forge lists sourceforge net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge


End of Gtkmm-forge Digest