Re: [gtk-vnc-devel] Supporting VMware VNC extensions in gtk-vnc
- From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange redhat com>
- To: Dustin Byford <dbyford vmware com>
- Cc: gtk-vnc-devel List <gtk-vnc-devel lists sourceforge net>, Ramesh Dharan <rrdharan vmware com>, vm-rfb vmware com
- Subject: Re: [gtk-vnc-devel] Supporting VMware VNC extensions in gtk-vnc
- Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 22:04:00 +0000
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 01:12:49PM -0800, Dustin Byford wrote:
> On Fri Jan 04 20:53, Ramesh Dharan wrote:
> > > As Ramesh points out, I'll be working on a way to
> > > negotiate client->server message capabilities reasonably soon. With
> > > that, I hope to have more formal documentation as well.
> >
> > Just so we're all on the same page: there *is* an acceptable way to negotiate new client->server messages, which Anthony previously outlined for me. I don't believe it's spelled out in exact detail in the latest RFB protocol document, but it works as follows:
> >
> > - client reports that it supports the new message type using an encoding number in the set of encodings it sends to the server
> > - server sends a dummy 'ack' rectangle back using that encoding number to confirm that the server supports it
> > - client starts sending messages using the new message type as it desires
>
> Sure, but like our "custom" multiplexing of VMWMessages, we'll probably
> want a way to figure out which sub-messages (VMWKey/VMWPointer/[new
> stuff]) the server can support. I guess we could burn a rectangle
> encoding for each one, but that seems like a waste. It might just be as
> simple as making that "ack rectangle" contain a list of supported
> sub-message IDs.
Rather than overloading meaning of the payload in the psuedo-encoding
still further it might be better to define one of the sub-message of
your VMWMessage as a feature negotiation message right from the start.
That way your protocol has built-in extensability. This is the approach
taken by existing extensions such as "Tight" and "VeNCrypt" - they
use a psuedo-encoding / auth type message to turn-on/detect presence
of the extension. From that point they use their own defined sub-messags
to negotiate various aspects of their protocol extension
Regards,
Dan.
--
|=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston. +1 978 392 2496 -=|
|=- Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ -=|
|=- Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/ -=|
|=- GnuPG: 7D3B9505 F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 -=|
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]