Re: Atom constants



Kevin Ryde wrote:
Torsten Schoenfeld <kaffeetisch gmx de> writes:
Is this a good idea?

If it was mine I'd leave it as is.  The class func style is fairly
reasonable, it doesn't seem so terrible as to ask everyone to change
their code.  (Gotta save that for when something big turns out to be
unworkable! :-)

Or as a justification it may even save a couple of bytes not to create
atom objects for constsubs which will be rarely used.

OK, convinced.

-- 
Bye,
-Torsten



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]