Hello=2C

I run a private = Zarafa server and use z-push (M$ ActiveSync) to synchronize my mails=2C cal= endar and adress book to my mobile devices. When I saw that Gnome Online Ac= counts has an option to support Exchange servers I was hopping to use this = for Gnome (3.6)=2C too. Since z-push does not yet support autodiscover I tr= ied to set up a PHP script which returns a XML to the request from GOA. I d= id not succeed with this=2C GOA always reports that it was unable to proces= s the returned XML.

I tried to run Gnome-CC in debug mode but the ou= tput was not helpful. So I now wondering how the XML has to like=2C so that= GOA can work with it and if I can even use my z-push setup.

I hope = for some insights=2C thanks in advance=2C

Tobias
= --_d523db95-e6ac-4762-9c72-7cd1f722c07d_-- From rishi.is@lostca.se Tue May 14 12:49:16 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by restaurant.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3D5A76B3E for ; Tue, 14 May 2013 12:49:16 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.557 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.557 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.556, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from restaurant.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (restaurant.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qaAVCeywDupj for ; Tue, 14 May 2013 12:49:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from arati.lostca.se (arati.lostca.se [144.76.32.53]) by restaurant.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2466476AD4 for ; Tue, 14 May 2013 12:48:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from arati.lostca.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arati.lostca.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64E55C37; Tue, 14 May 2013 12:47:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=lostca.se; h=date:from:to :cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :in-reply-to; s=howrah; bh=0V/jndJu2or/va1IwIAd4zMmnWQ=; b=shNE+ 5P29PhWMvmeH9+fm+tPF8K0mrtXoR75JOPeZCo5jdZvCZKeCmbarEeB8aosfjlNL AFLVyJvGNvvK3X5Z8TC0ClfHMxzq9XGuvRAHgL2l7Tgr21Q0w9XaKI4bv42k4sY/ iJTv9mAqOprtKFGzU017rNcCWLkNnG5yu1tlvM= Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arati.lostca.se (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 304BCC36; Tue, 14 May 2013 12:47:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 12:47:48 +0000 From: Debarshi Ray To: Tobias Wei? Subject: Re: Does GOA support ActiveSync? Message-ID: <20130514124747.GD41938@arati.lostca.se> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6Nae48J/T25AfBN4" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: "gnomecc-list@gnome.org" X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 12:49:16 -0000 --6Nae48J/T25AfBN4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable GOA's Exchange support works via Exchange Web Services or EWS [1]. Therefore trying to use it with ActiveSync servers will not work. We could (and probably should) support ActiveSync because I was told that sometimes the same server is configured to work via EWS inside the corporate firewall and via ActiveSync outside it. But I don't know: - how we should present it to the user without causing unnecessary confusion - the legal situation [2] Cheers, Debarshi [1] http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/exchange/bb204119(v=3Dexchg.140= ).aspx [2] https://git.gnome.org/browse/evolution-activesync/tree/README#n36 --=20 Life is like bein' on a mule team. Unless you're the lead mule, all the scenery looks about the same. --6Nae48J/T25AfBN4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJRkjJzAAoJEEMnBfrN1AMlD3sQAIkZHhotWwotIw9BAXM+pvCd HB9BQe/urxF6V2eAb3qczD7V6bH7UujoO2EPZ9V7ZeGNybItv+6ozMpGx3i3OgGj pGTNJ4dzUHSn3nDxtIO4ql1eEfoLLsL2C7GWgbVKTyuRaIyBP4ImhciTJ2cpews9 N0oqykxztokooZ7tlGyJ5J34Q08Bp+JC6T4YFs3/vY/GeP2AH952Rpz4pUDBdu0+ 8Ldy86Lw0l7lrlzNojyLMsAHMxcQKytGBn3WrQEJnYwwZsQ3wdIe7tDXptEQ3att TAAE8QsqMimtC5hPwgskjOKkglKaH2r21Lql2jUhhZfVlN85iWNwhv9LBQ/zgtKl 9hhhPbMpKKFmBWaCZaMWsy6zKQrd71xCEloWcZiOFCihDQ0KXGgA20/ClG/2l1dT WpLbCTn+3Cw2iftayzUKCqpwlPJTl3XIOTwatInA7jdJEZ5XACXOc7Aiku3RBfqQ UHsexdZHNIaU5doQ1BxIsZZQZD/kzlEAg7HB66WIFt4BzjIcxuD/jLLttQOT3cne nUgyxJAj2EWnY+vEU9HwO6NDxrFcxXFRsc6I1NJfAvBneyqGuI3UcEjJ2kDK3alb jOffrnoAvsVBUV+dlNuhl8CaIQ6l+J3YQBXO38tMBtKYa9UHAnaqdGs9muqpLNdK vwbPP07Z24hV1xLjIeku =xMe5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6Nae48J/T25AfBN4-- From jopereir@redhat.com Fri May 17 13:22:10 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by restaurant.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4884676C64 for ; Fri, 17 May 2013 13:22:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -7.458 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.458 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.556, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from restaurant.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (restaurant.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QA2jWTR6u8IT for ; Fri, 17 May 2013 13:22:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx3-phx2.redhat.com (mx3-phx2.redhat.com [209.132.183.24]) by restaurant.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B126762E1 for ; Fri, 17 May 2013 13:21:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zmail15.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (zmail15.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.83.17]) by mx3-phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r4HDLu60021642 for ; Fri, 17 May 2013 09:21:56 -0400 Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 09:21:56 -0400 (EDT) From: Joaquim Rocha To: GNOME CC List Message-ID: <765636622.3209136.1368796916534.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1216818108.3202609.1368796066972.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> Subject: Wacom: Map buttons from the OSD MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.5.82.11] X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.0.3_GA_5664 (ZimbraWebClient - GC25 (Linux)/8.0.3_GA_5664) Thread-Topic: Wacom: Map buttons from the OSD Thread-Index: WcRBZOcNNPRoQT876UOmJtzwh8XO3A== X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 13:22:10 -0000 Hi folks, When users want to map a tablet's button, they need to go through the "Map Buttons" dialog which shows a treeview where numbered buttons can be assigned to functions. While this is not complicated, it does require users to interpret those button numbers and associate them with a tablet's layout. I thought that an easier way for a user to map buttons would be to do it in the OSD Window which shows already the buttons layout and design very close to the actual tablet's. I don't know yet how difficult this would be (because the OSD Window just renders an SVG and highlights the buttons being pressed) but if the OSD Window had two modes -- "normal", to just check the current button mapping, and "edition", to map the buttons -- it would provide a much more natural way for the user to change the mapping, IMHO. This way, we could add a (graphical) button to the OSD Window to change its mode and, when the user chose the "edit" mode, after pressing a button on the tablet, they would be presented with the mapping choices. This requires a good deal of design so, in case you think this is a good idea, we could ask a designer to come up with some sketches. What do you think? -- Joaquim Rocha http://www.joaquimrocha.com