From thos at gnome.org Fri Jun 16 06:31:48 2006 From: thos at gnome.org (Thomas Wood) Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:31:48 +0100 Subject: Single Instance Capplets In-Reply-To: <1150111040.4035.8.camel@formigal.home> References: <20060610083042.99545.qmail@web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <1150111040.4035.8.camel@formigal.home> Message-ID: <44928894.5090903@gnome.org> Rodrigo Moya wrote: > On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 01:30 -0700, Joachim Noreiko wrote: > >>> Since Iain has written up a nice article on how to implement single >>> >> instance programs with dbus[1], I'd like to know people's thoughts about >> implementing this in the capplets. >> >> There's a summer of code project related to this: http://live.gnome.org/SingleInstanceApps >> >> >> >>> I can't see any reason why any of the >>> >> capplets should be open more than once at a time >> >> Neither can I. >> >> > right, let's do it. Now that Sergey is going to commit his CORBA->DBUS > patch, we can use DBUS with no problem, so yeah, who's going to write > the patch? :-) > Well, I assume we wait for the Summer of Code project mentioned above to be completed, and then use that? -Thomas From thos at gnome.org Fri Jun 16 06:34:05 2006 From: thos at gnome.org (Thomas Wood) Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:34:05 +0100 Subject: Bugzilla Components Message-ID: <4492891D.9030005@gnome.org> Would anyone object if I got bugzilla maintainer dummy accounts set up for each of the control center components, and then assigned them as the default QA contact? I want to track bugs in the theme switcher component, but I'm not really interested in all the other control center bugs. -Thomas From rodrigo at novell.com Fri Jun 16 06:27:49 2006 From: rodrigo at novell.com (Rodrigo Moya) Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 12:27:49 +0200 Subject: Single Instance Capplets In-Reply-To: <44928894.5090903@gnome.org> References: <20060610083042.99545.qmail@web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <1150111040.4035.8.camel@formigal.home> <44928894.5090903@gnome.org> Message-ID: <1150453669.5204.13.camel@formigal.home> On Fri, 2006-06-16 at 11:31 +0100, Thomas Wood wrote: > Rodrigo Moya wrote: > > On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 01:30 -0700, Joachim Noreiko wrote: > > > >>> Since Iain has written up a nice article on how to implement single > >>> > >> instance programs with dbus[1], I'd like to know people's thoughts about > >> implementing this in the capplets. > >> > >> There's a summer of code project related to this: http://live.gnome.org/SingleInstanceApps > >> > >> > >> > >>> I can't see any reason why any of the > >>> > >> capplets should be open more than once at a time > >> > >> Neither can I. > >> > >> > > right, let's do it. Now that Sergey is going to commit his CORBA->DBUS > > patch, we can use DBUS with no problem, so yeah, who's going to write > > the patch? :-) > > > Well, I assume we wait for the Summer of Code project mentioned above to > be completed, and then use that? > yeah, right -- Rodrigo Moya From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Mon Jun 5 05:58:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24D273B0810 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 05:58:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20398-03 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 05:58:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from peabody.ximian.com (peabody.ximian.com [130.57.169.10]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B5D53B031D for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 05:58:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 14268 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2006 09:58:02 -0000 Received: from outbound.ximian.com (HELO 164-99-120-128.boston.ximian.com) (130.57.170.250) by peabody.ximian.com with SMTP; 5 Jun 2006 09:58:02 -0000 From: Rodrigo Moya To: Sergey Udaltsov In-Reply-To: <48890e640605290110h64b6d956m6ace40f27da41d2b@mail.gmail.com> References: <1148680890.6716.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1148885409.3857.11.camel@arette.site> <48890e640605290110h64b6d956m6ace40f27da41d2b@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 11:57:00 +0200 Message-Id: <1149501420.12548.43.camel@cerler.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.561 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.038, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.561 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Control Center List Subject: Re: [Fwd: RFP: Keyboard Configuration Registry over dbus] X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 09:58:05 -0000 On Mon, 2006-05-29 at 09:10 +0100, Sergey Udaltsov wrote: > Hello Rodrigo, > > > and how will the DBUS interface look like? That is, will it send over > > the bus the whole XML file? > Well, this is a very good question. Let me explain. > There are two relatively separate tasks, as far as keyboard concerned: > - configuration (gnome-keyboard-properties capplet) > - indication (gnome-keyboard-indicator applet and any other app which > would need to indicate the current status) > > For the configuration purposes, we really need entire XML - that is > why I am going to leave g-k-p as it is - loading XML and working with > it locally. g-k-p lifetime is short, people run it very unfrequently, > so I do not think that making dbus interface very complex would be > adjusted by the potential benefits. > > But for the indication purposes, you need only several strings - the > descriptions of the currently loaded layouts. So at this point, I plan > only one function, returning 4 arrays of strings (short/long > descriptions or layouts/variants). This should be enough for the > applet and screensaver and any other indication purposes. > > Does this make sense to you? > well, I'm still not sure, Seb (or any other), any comment? > > This way, I don't think we'll use more RAM than what we use now. > Well, g-s-d will keep the parsed XML in memory - which will definitely > take some RAM. > right -- Rodrigo Moya From sergey.udaltsov@gmail.com Mon Jun 5 08:04:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3824E3B0751 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 08:04:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28553-05 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 08:04:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.170]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 598873B08AD for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 08:03:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so1221351uge for ; Mon, 05 Jun 2006 05:03:51 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=oQuXUzNHHLCNheSb0UXTeIxrK0V8zAomOClfwmgZhhjLYhh9glk1RMYjntDxkTyTGynJ2okSMaZQU7hAYsY2irFNaiem45wCmbhUYy8EYF4zeNVh/Nw0dX0a2YlG9b5CcxwkXqS5AUsX9S+Dz3LX62EWluLZEl8011AX408xjEI= Received: by 10.78.17.1 with SMTP id 1mr848292huq; Mon, 05 Jun 2006 05:03:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.26.5 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 05:03:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48890e640606050503i7da5e48dhca6d9d875d60d151@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 13:03:50 +0100 From: "Sergey Udaltsov" To: "Rodrigo Moya" In-Reply-To: <1149501420.12548.43.camel@cerler.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1148680890.6716.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1148885409.3857.11.camel@arette.site> <48890e640605290110h64b6d956m6ace40f27da41d2b@mail.gmail.com> <1149501420.12548.43.camel@cerler.home> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.171 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.428, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.171 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Control Center List Subject: Re: [Fwd: RFP: Keyboard Configuration Registry over dbus] X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 12:04:34 -0000 > well, I'm still not sure, Seb (or any other), any comment? Well, then how would you see this interface? I would not like to transfer entire huge DOM over DBUS - I'm afraid it would kill all the performance/memory gains... Sergey From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Mon Jun 5 09:19:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E20BC3B03B1 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 09:19:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01234-08 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 09:19:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from peabody.ximian.com (peabody.ximian.com [130.57.169.10]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EB923B0814 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 09:19:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 14395 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2006 13:19:13 -0000 Received: from outbound.ximian.com (HELO 164-99-120-128.boston.ximian.com) (130.57.170.250) by peabody.ximian.com with SMTP; 5 Jun 2006 13:19:13 -0000 From: Rodrigo Moya To: Sergey Udaltsov In-Reply-To: <48890e640606050503i7da5e48dhca6d9d875d60d151@mail.gmail.com> References: <1148680890.6716.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1148885409.3857.11.camel@arette.site> <48890e640605290110h64b6d956m6ace40f27da41d2b@mail.gmail.com> <1149501420.12548.43.camel@cerler.home> <48890e640606050503i7da5e48dhca6d9d875d60d151@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 15:18:12 +0200 Message-Id: <1149513492.17928.4.camel@cerler.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.561 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.038, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.561 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Control Center List Subject: Re: [Fwd: RFP: Keyboard Configuration Registry over dbus] X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 13:19:21 -0000 On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 13:03 +0100, Sergey Udaltsov wrote: > > well, I'm still not sure, Seb (or any other), any comment? > Well, then how would you see this interface? I would not like to > transfer entire huge DOM over DBUS - I'm afraid it would kill all the > performance/memory gains... > oh no, I don't want that neither :) I'm just not sure what the best would be, so let's go with your original plan unless there are other comments -- Rodrigo Moya From thos@gnome.org Fri Jun 9 10:18:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66E893B00DF for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 10:18:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30284-05 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 10:18:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from orion.thos.me.uk (88-96-30-66.dsl.zen.co.uk [88.96.30.66]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 294F43B0156 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 10:18:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from changepp.gotadsl.co.uk ([62.3.227.107] helo=[192.168.20.137]) by orion.thos.me.uk with esmtpa (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1FohnO-0008V6-Kk for ; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 15:17:06 +0100 Message-ID: <4489849A.4080603@gnome.org> Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 15:24:26 +0100 From: Thomas Wood User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.45 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.014, BAYES_00=-2.599, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.135] X-Spam-Score: -2.45 X-Spam-Level: Subject: Single Instance Capplets X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 14:18:10 -0000 Since Iain has written up a nice article on how to implement single instance programs with dbus[1], I'd like to know people's thoughts about implementing this in the capplets. I can't see any reason why any of the capplets should be open more than once at a time, and it has caused me confusion on more than one occasion (I assumed that trying to open the capplet again would raise the existing capplet, not open a second instance). It'd be nice to have this done the same way for all applets, so any thoughts and suggestions on how to implement this? -Thomas [1] http://www.o-hand.com/~iain/single-instance-with-dbus/making-single-instance-programs-with-dbus.html From jnoreiko@yahoo.com Sat Jun 10 04:30:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8576D3B034A for ; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 04:30:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19317-07 for ; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 04:30:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.207.206]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 579963B02ED for ; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 04:30:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 99547 invoked by uid 60001); 10 Jun 2006 08:30:42 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=dWZDEGMsY61OTGx0FcnOIBOxuUmxMDFGggGG1iubIqUwOEo5bcy/pLivxKoPSa+yMlF1q1MPIWQmS44zcsI+Iyd47mblnYnCQoVza+aRibh47rIfBywyoyAIAqxYDhmiq3l3h+b1UDg9vSOjfzJkT6euUjHGXzg7FnZcTaMcBdg= ; Message-ID: <20060610083042.99545.qmail@web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [172.141.114.46] by web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 01:30:42 PDT Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 01:30:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Joachim Noreiko To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <20060609160023.43AA03B024A@menubar.gnome.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.355 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-2.003, BAYES_50=0.001, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE=0.2, DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS=1.447] X-Spam-Score: -0.355 X-Spam-Level: Subject: Re: Single Instance Capplets X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Joachim Noreiko List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 08:30:44 -0000 > Since Iain has written up a nice article on how to implement single instance programs with dbus[1], I'd like to know people's thoughts about implementing this in the capplets. There's a summer of code project related to this: http://live.gnome.org/SingleInstanceApps > I can't see any reason why any of the capplets should be open more than once at a time Neither can I. From rodrigo@novell.com Mon Jun 12 07:25:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B5CA3B008A for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 07:25:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32032-08 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 07:25:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from peabody.ximian.com (peabody.ximian.com [130.57.169.10]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F2DB3B0083 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 07:25:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 21118 invoked from network); 12 Jun 2006 11:24:42 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO 164-99-120-91.boston.ximian.com) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 12 Jun 2006 11:24:42 -0000 From: Rodrigo Moya To: Joachim Noreiko In-Reply-To: <20060610083042.99545.qmail@web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <20060610083042.99545.qmail@web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 13:17:20 +0200 Message-Id: <1150111040.4035.8.camel@formigal.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.411 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-0.012, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE=0.2] X-Spam-Score: -2.411 X-Spam-Level: Cc: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: Single Instance Capplets X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 11:25:34 -0000 On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 01:30 -0700, Joachim Noreiko wrote: > > Since Iain has written up a nice article on how to implement single > instance programs with dbus[1], I'd like to know people's thoughts about > implementing this in the capplets. > > There's a summer of code project related to this: http://live.gnome.org/SingleInstanceApps > > > > I can't see any reason why any of the > capplets should be open more than once at a time > > Neither can I. > right, let's do it. Now that Sergey is going to commit his CORBA->DBUS patch, we can use DBUS with no problem, so yeah, who's going to write the patch? :-) -- Rodrigo Moya From rodrigo@novell.com Mon Jun 12 17:45:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A628B3B0010 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 17:45:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32679-05 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 17:45:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from peabody.ximian.com (peabody.ximian.com [130.57.169.10]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 901D93B0072 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 17:45:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 22167 invoked from network); 12 Jun 2006 21:43:46 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?164.99.120.183?) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 12 Jun 2006 21:43:46 -0000 From: Rodrigo Moya To: gnome-announce-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 23:36:21 +0200 Message-Id: <1150148182.16907.0.camel@formigal.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.335 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-0.090, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE=0.2, TW_BX=0.077, TW_IB=0.077] X-Spam-Score: -2.335 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Control Center List Subject: control-center 2.15.3 released X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 21:45:54 -0000 Changes since 2.14.2 -------------------- about me: - Fixed typo (Rodrigo Moya) (324971) - Fixed compilation issues (Rodrigo Moya) (344468) default applications: - Added support for Sylpheed (Luca Cavalli) (332659) - Removed unnecessary gnome-terminal argument (Luca Cavalli) (336700) keybindings: - Removed brightness keybindings, now in gnome-power-manager (Bastien Nocera) (339857) keyboard: - Save/restore layout preview window geometry (Sergey Udaltsov) mouse: - Fixed selection when no cursor font is set in GConf (Darren Kenny) (340003) sound: - Added sound device selection (Jürg Billeter) (329112) - Fixed button strings (Rodrigo Moya) (324971) theme-switcher: - Removed drag & drop information text (Thomas Wood) (99535) - Added Install buttons to each tab in the details window (Thomas Wood) - Remember last browsed or installed from location (Thomas Wood) (138795) - Don't allow invalid characters in theme names (Thomas Wood) (139692) - Don't ask user whether to overwrite or not internal files (Thomas Wood) (317375) - Allow saving background image for custom themes (Thomas Wood) (330302) - Fixed UI issues in the save dialog (Thomas Wood) (100622) settings daemon: - Fixed libxklavier engine initialization logic (Sergey Udaltsov) (333091) - Removed references to brightness controls (Bastien Nocera) (339857) - Fixed leaks (Paolo Borelli) (342568, 342570) general: - Updated to new libxklavier API (Sergey Udaltsov) updated translations: - bg (Alexander Shopov) - cs (Miloslav Trmac, Lukas Novotny, Jakub Friedl) - dz (Pema Geyleg) - es (Francisco Javier F. Serrador) - fi (Ilkka Tuohela) - gl (Ignacio Casal Quinteiro) - gu (Ankit Patel) - mg (Simos Xenitellis) - nb (Kjartan Maraas) - sq (Laurent Dhima) - sv (Daniel Nylander) - th (Theppitak Karoonboonyanan) - vi (Clytie Siddall) - zh_CN (Funda Wang) - zh_HK (Chao-Hsiung Liao) - zh_TW (Chao-Hsiung Liao) Availability ------------ http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/control-center/2.15/ Contact ------- * Bugs in http://bugzilla.gnome.org * Mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomecc-list -- Rodrigo Moya From thos@gnome.org Fri Jun 16 06:26:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 531493B007A for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 06:26:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25585-02 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 06:26:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from orion.thos.me.uk (88-96-30-66.dsl.zen.co.uk [88.96.30.66]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E128F3B0011 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 06:26:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from changepp.gotadsl.co.uk ([62.3.227.107] helo=[192.168.20.137]) by orion.thos.me.uk with esmtpa (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1FrBV1-00015F-3a; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:24:23 +0100 Message-ID: <44928894.5090903@gnome.org> Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:31:48 +0100 From: Thomas Wood User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rodrigo Moya Subject: Re: Single Instance Capplets References: <20060610083042.99545.qmail@web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <1150111040.4035.8.camel@formigal.home> In-Reply-To: <1150111040.4035.8.camel@formigal.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.45 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.014, BAYES_00=-2.599, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.135] X-Spam-Score: -2.45 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Joachim Noreiko , gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 10:26:37 -0000 Rodrigo Moya wrote: > On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 01:30 -0700, Joachim Noreiko wrote: > >>> Since Iain has written up a nice article on how to implement single >>> >> instance programs with dbus[1], I'd like to know people's thoughts about >> implementing this in the capplets. >> >> There's a summer of code project related to this: http://live.gnome.org/SingleInstanceApps >> >> >> >>> I can't see any reason why any of the >>> >> capplets should be open more than once at a time >> >> Neither can I. >> >> > right, let's do it. Now that Sergey is going to commit his CORBA->DBUS > patch, we can use DBUS with no problem, so yeah, who's going to write > the patch? :-) > Well, I assume we wait for the Summer of Code project mentioned above to be completed, and then use that? -Thomas From thos@gnome.org Fri Jun 16 07:12:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60FFA3B0012 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 07:12:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26675-02 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 07:12:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from orion.thos.me.uk (88-96-30-66.dsl.zen.co.uk [88.96.30.66]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4048E3B007A for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 07:12:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from changepp.gotadsl.co.uk ([62.3.227.107] helo=[192.168.20.137]) by orion.thos.me.uk with esmtpa (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1FrBXE-00015P-55 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:26:40 +0100 Message-ID: <4492891D.9030005@gnome.org> Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:34:05 +0100 From: Thomas Wood User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Subject: Bugzilla Components Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.451 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.013, BAYES_00=-2.599, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.135] X-Spam-Score: -2.451 X-Spam-Level: X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:12:19 -0000 Would anyone object if I got bugzilla maintainer dummy accounts set up for each of the control center components, and then assigned them as the default QA contact? I want to track bugs in the theme switcher component, but I'm not really interested in all the other control center bugs. -Thomas From rodrigo@novell.com Fri Jun 16 08:23:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3D6F3B0076 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 08:23:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28295-04 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 08:23:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from peabody.ximian.com (peabody.ximian.com [130.57.169.10]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78F733B002C for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 08:23:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 25986 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2006 10:35:41 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO 164-99-120-49.boston.ximian.com) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Jun 2006 10:35:41 -0000 Subject: Re: Single Instance Capplets From: Rodrigo Moya To: Thomas Wood In-Reply-To: <44928894.5090903@gnome.org> References: <20060610083042.99545.qmail@web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <1150111040.4035.8.camel@formigal.home> <44928894.5090903@gnome.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 12:27:49 +0200 Message-Id: <1150453669.5204.13.camel@formigal.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.412 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-0.013, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE=0.2] X-Spam-Score: -2.412 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Joachim Noreiko , gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 12:23:01 -0000 On Fri, 2006-06-16 at 11:31 +0100, Thomas Wood wrote: > Rodrigo Moya wrote: > > On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 01:30 -0700, Joachim Noreiko wrote: > > > >>> Since Iain has written up a nice article on how to implement single > >>> > >> instance programs with dbus[1], I'd like to know people's thoughts about > >> implementing this in the capplets. > >> > >> There's a summer of code project related to this: http://live.gnome.org/SingleInstanceApps > >> > >> > >> > >>> I can't see any reason why any of the > >>> > >> capplets should be open more than once at a time > >> > >> Neither can I. > >> > >> > > right, let's do it. Now that Sergey is going to commit his CORBA->DBUS > > patch, we can use DBUS with no problem, so yeah, who's going to write > > the patch? :-) > > > Well, I assume we wait for the Summer of Code project mentioned above to > be completed, and then use that? > yeah, right -- Rodrigo Moya From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Mon Jun 5 05:58:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24D273B0810 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 05:58:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20398-03 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 05:58:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from peabody.ximian.com (peabody.ximian.com [130.57.169.10]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B5D53B031D for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 05:58:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 14268 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2006 09:58:02 -0000 Received: from outbound.ximian.com (HELO 164-99-120-128.boston.ximian.com) (130.57.170.250) by peabody.ximian.com with SMTP; 5 Jun 2006 09:58:02 -0000 From: Rodrigo Moya To: Sergey Udaltsov In-Reply-To: <48890e640605290110h64b6d956m6ace40f27da41d2b@mail.gmail.com> References: <1148680890.6716.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1148885409.3857.11.camel@arette.site> <48890e640605290110h64b6d956m6ace40f27da41d2b@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 11:57:00 +0200 Message-Id: <1149501420.12548.43.camel@cerler.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.561 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.038, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.561 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Control Center List Subject: Re: [Fwd: RFP: Keyboard Configuration Registry over dbus] X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 09:58:05 -0000 On Mon, 2006-05-29 at 09:10 +0100, Sergey Udaltsov wrote: > Hello Rodrigo, > > > and how will the DBUS interface look like? That is, will it send over > > the bus the whole XML file? > Well, this is a very good question. Let me explain. > There are two relatively separate tasks, as far as keyboard concerned: > - configuration (gnome-keyboard-properties capplet) > - indication (gnome-keyboard-indicator applet and any other app which > would need to indicate the current status) > > For the configuration purposes, we really need entire XML - that is > why I am going to leave g-k-p as it is - loading XML and working with > it locally. g-k-p lifetime is short, people run it very unfrequently, > so I do not think that making dbus interface very complex would be > adjusted by the potential benefits. > > But for the indication purposes, you need only several strings - the > descriptions of the currently loaded layouts. So at this point, I plan > only one function, returning 4 arrays of strings (short/long > descriptions or layouts/variants). This should be enough for the > applet and screensaver and any other indication purposes. > > Does this make sense to you? > well, I'm still not sure, Seb (or any other), any comment? > > This way, I don't think we'll use more RAM than what we use now. > Well, g-s-d will keep the parsed XML in memory - which will definitely > take some RAM. > right -- Rodrigo Moya From sergey.udaltsov@gmail.com Mon Jun 5 08:04:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3824E3B0751 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 08:04:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28553-05 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 08:04:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.170]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 598873B08AD for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 08:03:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so1221351uge for ; Mon, 05 Jun 2006 05:03:51 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=oQuXUzNHHLCNheSb0UXTeIxrK0V8zAomOClfwmgZhhjLYhh9glk1RMYjntDxkTyTGynJ2okSMaZQU7hAYsY2irFNaiem45wCmbhUYy8EYF4zeNVh/Nw0dX0a2YlG9b5CcxwkXqS5AUsX9S+Dz3LX62EWluLZEl8011AX408xjEI= Received: by 10.78.17.1 with SMTP id 1mr848292huq; Mon, 05 Jun 2006 05:03:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.26.5 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 05:03:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48890e640606050503i7da5e48dhca6d9d875d60d151@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 13:03:50 +0100 From: "Sergey Udaltsov" To: "Rodrigo Moya" In-Reply-To: <1149501420.12548.43.camel@cerler.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1148680890.6716.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1148885409.3857.11.camel@arette.site> <48890e640605290110h64b6d956m6ace40f27da41d2b@mail.gmail.com> <1149501420.12548.43.camel@cerler.home> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.171 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.428, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.171 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Control Center List Subject: Re: [Fwd: RFP: Keyboard Configuration Registry over dbus] X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 12:04:34 -0000 > well, I'm still not sure, Seb (or any other), any comment? Well, then how would you see this interface? I would not like to transfer entire huge DOM over DBUS - I'm afraid it would kill all the performance/memory gains... Sergey From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Mon Jun 5 09:19:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E20BC3B03B1 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 09:19:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01234-08 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 09:19:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from peabody.ximian.com (peabody.ximian.com [130.57.169.10]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EB923B0814 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 09:19:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 14395 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2006 13:19:13 -0000 Received: from outbound.ximian.com (HELO 164-99-120-128.boston.ximian.com) (130.57.170.250) by peabody.ximian.com with SMTP; 5 Jun 2006 13:19:13 -0000 From: Rodrigo Moya To: Sergey Udaltsov In-Reply-To: <48890e640606050503i7da5e48dhca6d9d875d60d151@mail.gmail.com> References: <1148680890.6716.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1148885409.3857.11.camel@arette.site> <48890e640605290110h64b6d956m6ace40f27da41d2b@mail.gmail.com> <1149501420.12548.43.camel@cerler.home> <48890e640606050503i7da5e48dhca6d9d875d60d151@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 15:18:12 +0200 Message-Id: <1149513492.17928.4.camel@cerler.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.561 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.038, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.561 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Control Center List Subject: Re: [Fwd: RFP: Keyboard Configuration Registry over dbus] X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 13:19:21 -0000 On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 13:03 +0100, Sergey Udaltsov wrote: > > well, I'm still not sure, Seb (or any other), any comment? > Well, then how would you see this interface? I would not like to > transfer entire huge DOM over DBUS - I'm afraid it would kill all the > performance/memory gains... > oh no, I don't want that neither :) I'm just not sure what the best would be, so let's go with your original plan unless there are other comments -- Rodrigo Moya From thos@gnome.org Fri Jun 9 10:18:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66E893B00DF for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 10:18:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30284-05 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 10:18:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from orion.thos.me.uk (88-96-30-66.dsl.zen.co.uk [88.96.30.66]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 294F43B0156 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 10:18:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from changepp.gotadsl.co.uk ([62.3.227.107] helo=[192.168.20.137]) by orion.thos.me.uk with esmtpa (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1FohnO-0008V6-Kk for ; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 15:17:06 +0100 Message-ID: <4489849A.4080603@gnome.org> Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 15:24:26 +0100 From: Thomas Wood User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.45 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.014, BAYES_00=-2.599, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.135] X-Spam-Score: -2.45 X-Spam-Level: Subject: Single Instance Capplets X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 14:18:10 -0000 Since Iain has written up a nice article on how to implement single instance programs with dbus[1], I'd like to know people's thoughts about implementing this in the capplets. I can't see any reason why any of the capplets should be open more than once at a time, and it has caused me confusion on more than one occasion (I assumed that trying to open the capplet again would raise the existing capplet, not open a second instance). It'd be nice to have this done the same way for all applets, so any thoughts and suggestions on how to implement this? -Thomas [1] http://www.o-hand.com/~iain/single-instance-with-dbus/making-single-instance-programs-with-dbus.html From jnoreiko@yahoo.com Sat Jun 10 04:30:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8576D3B034A for ; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 04:30:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19317-07 for ; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 04:30:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.207.206]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 579963B02ED for ; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 04:30:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 99547 invoked by uid 60001); 10 Jun 2006 08:30:42 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=dWZDEGMsY61OTGx0FcnOIBOxuUmxMDFGggGG1iubIqUwOEo5bcy/pLivxKoPSa+yMlF1q1MPIWQmS44zcsI+Iyd47mblnYnCQoVza+aRibh47rIfBywyoyAIAqxYDhmiq3l3h+b1UDg9vSOjfzJkT6euUjHGXzg7FnZcTaMcBdg= ; Message-ID: <20060610083042.99545.qmail@web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [172.141.114.46] by web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 01:30:42 PDT Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 01:30:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Joachim Noreiko To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <20060609160023.43AA03B024A@menubar.gnome.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.355 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-2.003, BAYES_50=0.001, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE=0.2, DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS=1.447] X-Spam-Score: -0.355 X-Spam-Level: Subject: Re: Single Instance Capplets X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Joachim Noreiko List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 08:30:44 -0000 > Since Iain has written up a nice article on how to implement single instance programs with dbus[1], I'd like to know people's thoughts about implementing this in the capplets. There's a summer of code project related to this: http://live.gnome.org/SingleInstanceApps > I can't see any reason why any of the capplets should be open more than once at a time Neither can I. From rodrigo@novell.com Mon Jun 12 07:25:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B5CA3B008A for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 07:25:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32032-08 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 07:25:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from peabody.ximian.com (peabody.ximian.com [130.57.169.10]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F2DB3B0083 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 07:25:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 21118 invoked from network); 12 Jun 2006 11:24:42 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO 164-99-120-91.boston.ximian.com) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 12 Jun 2006 11:24:42 -0000 From: Rodrigo Moya To: Joachim Noreiko In-Reply-To: <20060610083042.99545.qmail@web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <20060610083042.99545.qmail@web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 13:17:20 +0200 Message-Id: <1150111040.4035.8.camel@formigal.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.411 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-0.012, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE=0.2] X-Spam-Score: -2.411 X-Spam-Level: Cc: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: Single Instance Capplets X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 11:25:34 -0000 On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 01:30 -0700, Joachim Noreiko wrote: > > Since Iain has written up a nice article on how to implement single > instance programs with dbus[1], I'd like to know people's thoughts about > implementing this in the capplets. > > There's a summer of code project related to this: http://live.gnome.org/SingleInstanceApps > > > > I can't see any reason why any of the > capplets should be open more than once at a time > > Neither can I. > right, let's do it. Now that Sergey is going to commit his CORBA->DBUS patch, we can use DBUS with no problem, so yeah, who's going to write the patch? :-) -- Rodrigo Moya From rodrigo@novell.com Mon Jun 12 17:45:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A628B3B0010 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 17:45:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32679-05 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 17:45:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from peabody.ximian.com (peabody.ximian.com [130.57.169.10]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 901D93B0072 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 17:45:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 22167 invoked from network); 12 Jun 2006 21:43:46 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?164.99.120.183?) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 12 Jun 2006 21:43:46 -0000 From: Rodrigo Moya To: gnome-announce-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 23:36:21 +0200 Message-Id: <1150148182.16907.0.camel@formigal.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.335 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-0.090, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE=0.2, TW_BX=0.077, TW_IB=0.077] X-Spam-Score: -2.335 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Control Center List Subject: control-center 2.15.3 released X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 21:45:54 -0000 Changes since 2.14.2 -------------------- about me: - Fixed typo (Rodrigo Moya) (324971) - Fixed compilation issues (Rodrigo Moya) (344468) default applications: - Added support for Sylpheed (Luca Cavalli) (332659) - Removed unnecessary gnome-terminal argument (Luca Cavalli) (336700) keybindings: - Removed brightness keybindings, now in gnome-power-manager (Bastien Nocera) (339857) keyboard: - Save/restore layout preview window geometry (Sergey Udaltsov) mouse: - Fixed selection when no cursor font is set in GConf (Darren Kenny) (340003) sound: - Added sound device selection (Jürg Billeter) (329112) - Fixed button strings (Rodrigo Moya) (324971) theme-switcher: - Removed drag & drop information text (Thomas Wood) (99535) - Added Install buttons to each tab in the details window (Thomas Wood) - Remember last browsed or installed from location (Thomas Wood) (138795) - Don't allow invalid characters in theme names (Thomas Wood) (139692) - Don't ask user whether to overwrite or not internal files (Thomas Wood) (317375) - Allow saving background image for custom themes (Thomas Wood) (330302) - Fixed UI issues in the save dialog (Thomas Wood) (100622) settings daemon: - Fixed libxklavier engine initialization logic (Sergey Udaltsov) (333091) - Removed references to brightness controls (Bastien Nocera) (339857) - Fixed leaks (Paolo Borelli) (342568, 342570) general: - Updated to new libxklavier API (Sergey Udaltsov) updated translations: - bg (Alexander Shopov) - cs (Miloslav Trmac, Lukas Novotny, Jakub Friedl) - dz (Pema Geyleg) - es (Francisco Javier F. Serrador) - fi (Ilkka Tuohela) - gl (Ignacio Casal Quinteiro) - gu (Ankit Patel) - mg (Simos Xenitellis) - nb (Kjartan Maraas) - sq (Laurent Dhima) - sv (Daniel Nylander) - th (Theppitak Karoonboonyanan) - vi (Clytie Siddall) - zh_CN (Funda Wang) - zh_HK (Chao-Hsiung Liao) - zh_TW (Chao-Hsiung Liao) Availability ------------ http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/control-center/2.15/ Contact ------- * Bugs in http://bugzilla.gnome.org * Mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomecc-list -- Rodrigo Moya From thos@gnome.org Fri Jun 16 06:26:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 531493B007A for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 06:26:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25585-02 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 06:26:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from orion.thos.me.uk (88-96-30-66.dsl.zen.co.uk [88.96.30.66]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E128F3B0011 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 06:26:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from changepp.gotadsl.co.uk ([62.3.227.107] helo=[192.168.20.137]) by orion.thos.me.uk with esmtpa (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1FrBV1-00015F-3a; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:24:23 +0100 Message-ID: <44928894.5090903@gnome.org> Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:31:48 +0100 From: Thomas Wood User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rodrigo Moya Subject: Re: Single Instance Capplets References: <20060610083042.99545.qmail@web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <1150111040.4035.8.camel@formigal.home> In-Reply-To: <1150111040.4035.8.camel@formigal.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.45 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.014, BAYES_00=-2.599, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.135] X-Spam-Score: -2.45 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Joachim Noreiko , gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 10:26:37 -0000 Rodrigo Moya wrote: > On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 01:30 -0700, Joachim Noreiko wrote: > >>> Since Iain has written up a nice article on how to implement single >>> >> instance programs with dbus[1], I'd like to know people's thoughts about >> implementing this in the capplets. >> >> There's a summer of code project related to this: http://live.gnome.org/SingleInstanceApps >> >> >> >>> I can't see any reason why any of the >>> >> capplets should be open more than once at a time >> >> Neither can I. >> >> > right, let's do it. Now that Sergey is going to commit his CORBA->DBUS > patch, we can use DBUS with no problem, so yeah, who's going to write > the patch? :-) > Well, I assume we wait for the Summer of Code project mentioned above to be completed, and then use that? -Thomas From thos@gnome.org Fri Jun 16 07:12:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60FFA3B0012 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 07:12:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26675-02 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 07:12:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from orion.thos.me.uk (88-96-30-66.dsl.zen.co.uk [88.96.30.66]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4048E3B007A for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 07:12:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from changepp.gotadsl.co.uk ([62.3.227.107] helo=[192.168.20.137]) by orion.thos.me.uk with esmtpa (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1FrBXE-00015P-55 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:26:40 +0100 Message-ID: <4492891D.9030005@gnome.org> Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:34:05 +0100 From: Thomas Wood User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Subject: Bugzilla Components Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.451 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.013, BAYES_00=-2.599, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.135] X-Spam-Score: -2.451 X-Spam-Level: X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:12:19 -0000 Would anyone object if I got bugzilla maintainer dummy accounts set up for each of the control center components, and then assigned them as the default QA contact? I want to track bugs in the theme switcher component, but I'm not really interested in all the other control center bugs. -Thomas From rodrigo@novell.com Fri Jun 16 08:23:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3D6F3B0076 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 08:23:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28295-04 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 08:23:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from peabody.ximian.com (peabody.ximian.com [130.57.169.10]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78F733B002C for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 08:23:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 25986 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2006 10:35:41 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO 164-99-120-49.boston.ximian.com) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Jun 2006 10:35:41 -0000 Subject: Re: Single Instance Capplets From: Rodrigo Moya To: Thomas Wood In-Reply-To: <44928894.5090903@gnome.org> References: <20060610083042.99545.qmail@web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <1150111040.4035.8.camel@formigal.home> <44928894.5090903@gnome.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 12:27:49 +0200 Message-Id: <1150453669.5204.13.camel@formigal.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.412 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-0.013, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE=0.2] X-Spam-Score: -2.412 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Joachim Noreiko , gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 12:23:01 -0000 On Fri, 2006-06-16 at 11:31 +0100, Thomas Wood wrote: > Rodrigo Moya wrote: > > On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 01:30 -0700, Joachim Noreiko wrote: > > > >>> Since Iain has written up a nice article on how to implement single > >>> > >> instance programs with dbus[1], I'd like to know people's thoughts about > >> implementing this in the capplets. > >> > >> There's a summer of code project related to this: http://live.gnome.org/SingleInstanceApps > >> > >> > >> > >>> I can't see any reason why any of the > >>> > >> capplets should be open more than once at a time > >> > >> Neither can I. > >> > >> > > right, let's do it. Now that Sergey is going to commit his CORBA->DBUS > > patch, we can use DBUS with no problem, so yeah, who's going to write > > the patch? :-) > > > Well, I assume we wait for the Summer of Code project mentioned above to > be completed, and then use that? > yeah, right -- Rodrigo Moya From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Mon Jun 5 05:58:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24D273B0810 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 05:58:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20398-03 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 05:58:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from peabody.ximian.com (peabody.ximian.com [130.57.169.10]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B5D53B031D for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 05:58:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 14268 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2006 09:58:02 -0000 Received: from outbound.ximian.com (HELO 164-99-120-128.boston.ximian.com) (130.57.170.250) by peabody.ximian.com with SMTP; 5 Jun 2006 09:58:02 -0000 From: Rodrigo Moya To: Sergey Udaltsov In-Reply-To: <48890e640605290110h64b6d956m6ace40f27da41d2b@mail.gmail.com> References: <1148680890.6716.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1148885409.3857.11.camel@arette.site> <48890e640605290110h64b6d956m6ace40f27da41d2b@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 11:57:00 +0200 Message-Id: <1149501420.12548.43.camel@cerler.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.561 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.038, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.561 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Control Center List Subject: Re: [Fwd: RFP: Keyboard Configuration Registry over dbus] X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 09:58:05 -0000 On Mon, 2006-05-29 at 09:10 +0100, Sergey Udaltsov wrote: > Hello Rodrigo, > > > and how will the DBUS interface look like? That is, will it send over > > the bus the whole XML file? > Well, this is a very good question. Let me explain. > There are two relatively separate tasks, as far as keyboard concerned: > - configuration (gnome-keyboard-properties capplet) > - indication (gnome-keyboard-indicator applet and any other app which > would need to indicate the current status) > > For the configuration purposes, we really need entire XML - that is > why I am going to leave g-k-p as it is - loading XML and working with > it locally. g-k-p lifetime is short, people run it very unfrequently, > so I do not think that making dbus interface very complex would be > adjusted by the potential benefits. > > But for the indication purposes, you need only several strings - the > descriptions of the currently loaded layouts. So at this point, I plan > only one function, returning 4 arrays of strings (short/long > descriptions or layouts/variants). This should be enough for the > applet and screensaver and any other indication purposes. > > Does this make sense to you? > well, I'm still not sure, Seb (or any other), any comment? > > This way, I don't think we'll use more RAM than what we use now. > Well, g-s-d will keep the parsed XML in memory - which will definitely > take some RAM. > right -- Rodrigo Moya From sergey.udaltsov@gmail.com Mon Jun 5 08:04:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3824E3B0751 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 08:04:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28553-05 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 08:04:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.170]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 598873B08AD for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 08:03:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so1221351uge for ; Mon, 05 Jun 2006 05:03:51 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=oQuXUzNHHLCNheSb0UXTeIxrK0V8zAomOClfwmgZhhjLYhh9glk1RMYjntDxkTyTGynJ2okSMaZQU7hAYsY2irFNaiem45wCmbhUYy8EYF4zeNVh/Nw0dX0a2YlG9b5CcxwkXqS5AUsX9S+Dz3LX62EWluLZEl8011AX408xjEI= Received: by 10.78.17.1 with SMTP id 1mr848292huq; Mon, 05 Jun 2006 05:03:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.26.5 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 05:03:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48890e640606050503i7da5e48dhca6d9d875d60d151@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 13:03:50 +0100 From: "Sergey Udaltsov" To: "Rodrigo Moya" In-Reply-To: <1149501420.12548.43.camel@cerler.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1148680890.6716.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1148885409.3857.11.camel@arette.site> <48890e640605290110h64b6d956m6ace40f27da41d2b@mail.gmail.com> <1149501420.12548.43.camel@cerler.home> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.171 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.428, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.171 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Control Center List Subject: Re: [Fwd: RFP: Keyboard Configuration Registry over dbus] X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 12:04:34 -0000 > well, I'm still not sure, Seb (or any other), any comment? Well, then how would you see this interface? I would not like to transfer entire huge DOM over DBUS - I'm afraid it would kill all the performance/memory gains... Sergey From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Mon Jun 5 09:19:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E20BC3B03B1 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 09:19:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01234-08 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 09:19:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from peabody.ximian.com (peabody.ximian.com [130.57.169.10]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EB923B0814 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 09:19:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 14395 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2006 13:19:13 -0000 Received: from outbound.ximian.com (HELO 164-99-120-128.boston.ximian.com) (130.57.170.250) by peabody.ximian.com with SMTP; 5 Jun 2006 13:19:13 -0000 From: Rodrigo Moya To: Sergey Udaltsov In-Reply-To: <48890e640606050503i7da5e48dhca6d9d875d60d151@mail.gmail.com> References: <1148680890.6716.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1148885409.3857.11.camel@arette.site> <48890e640605290110h64b6d956m6ace40f27da41d2b@mail.gmail.com> <1149501420.12548.43.camel@cerler.home> <48890e640606050503i7da5e48dhca6d9d875d60d151@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 15:18:12 +0200 Message-Id: <1149513492.17928.4.camel@cerler.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.561 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.038, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.561 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Control Center List Subject: Re: [Fwd: RFP: Keyboard Configuration Registry over dbus] X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 13:19:21 -0000 On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 13:03 +0100, Sergey Udaltsov wrote: > > well, I'm still not sure, Seb (or any other), any comment? > Well, then how would you see this interface? I would not like to > transfer entire huge DOM over DBUS - I'm afraid it would kill all the > performance/memory gains... > oh no, I don't want that neither :) I'm just not sure what the best would be, so let's go with your original plan unless there are other comments -- Rodrigo Moya From thos@gnome.org Fri Jun 9 10:18:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66E893B00DF for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 10:18:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30284-05 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 10:18:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from orion.thos.me.uk (88-96-30-66.dsl.zen.co.uk [88.96.30.66]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 294F43B0156 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 10:18:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from changepp.gotadsl.co.uk ([62.3.227.107] helo=[192.168.20.137]) by orion.thos.me.uk with esmtpa (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1FohnO-0008V6-Kk for ; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 15:17:06 +0100 Message-ID: <4489849A.4080603@gnome.org> Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 15:24:26 +0100 From: Thomas Wood User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.45 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.014, BAYES_00=-2.599, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.135] X-Spam-Score: -2.45 X-Spam-Level: Subject: Single Instance Capplets X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 14:18:10 -0000 Since Iain has written up a nice article on how to implement single instance programs with dbus[1], I'd like to know people's thoughts about implementing this in the capplets. I can't see any reason why any of the capplets should be open more than once at a time, and it has caused me confusion on more than one occasion (I assumed that trying to open the capplet again would raise the existing capplet, not open a second instance). It'd be nice to have this done the same way for all applets, so any thoughts and suggestions on how to implement this? -Thomas [1] http://www.o-hand.com/~iain/single-instance-with-dbus/making-single-instance-programs-with-dbus.html From jnoreiko@yahoo.com Sat Jun 10 04:30:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8576D3B034A for ; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 04:30:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19317-07 for ; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 04:30:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.207.206]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 579963B02ED for ; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 04:30:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 99547 invoked by uid 60001); 10 Jun 2006 08:30:42 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=dWZDEGMsY61OTGx0FcnOIBOxuUmxMDFGggGG1iubIqUwOEo5bcy/pLivxKoPSa+yMlF1q1MPIWQmS44zcsI+Iyd47mblnYnCQoVza+aRibh47rIfBywyoyAIAqxYDhmiq3l3h+b1UDg9vSOjfzJkT6euUjHGXzg7FnZcTaMcBdg= ; Message-ID: <20060610083042.99545.qmail@web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [172.141.114.46] by web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 01:30:42 PDT Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 01:30:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Joachim Noreiko To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <20060609160023.43AA03B024A@menubar.gnome.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.355 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-2.003, BAYES_50=0.001, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE=0.2, DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS=1.447] X-Spam-Score: -0.355 X-Spam-Level: Subject: Re: Single Instance Capplets X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Joachim Noreiko List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 08:30:44 -0000 > Since Iain has written up a nice article on how to implement single instance programs with dbus[1], I'd like to know people's thoughts about implementing this in the capplets. There's a summer of code project related to this: http://live.gnome.org/SingleInstanceApps > I can't see any reason why any of the capplets should be open more than once at a time Neither can I. From rodrigo@novell.com Mon Jun 12 07:25:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B5CA3B008A for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 07:25:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32032-08 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 07:25:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from peabody.ximian.com (peabody.ximian.com [130.57.169.10]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F2DB3B0083 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 07:25:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 21118 invoked from network); 12 Jun 2006 11:24:42 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO 164-99-120-91.boston.ximian.com) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 12 Jun 2006 11:24:42 -0000 From: Rodrigo Moya To: Joachim Noreiko In-Reply-To: <20060610083042.99545.qmail@web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <20060610083042.99545.qmail@web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 13:17:20 +0200 Message-Id: <1150111040.4035.8.camel@formigal.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.411 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-0.012, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE=0.2] X-Spam-Score: -2.411 X-Spam-Level: Cc: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: Single Instance Capplets X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 11:25:34 -0000 On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 01:30 -0700, Joachim Noreiko wrote: > > Since Iain has written up a nice article on how to implement single > instance programs with dbus[1], I'd like to know people's thoughts about > implementing this in the capplets. > > There's a summer of code project related to this: http://live.gnome.org/SingleInstanceApps > > > > I can't see any reason why any of the > capplets should be open more than once at a time > > Neither can I. > right, let's do it. Now that Sergey is going to commit his CORBA->DBUS patch, we can use DBUS with no problem, so yeah, who's going to write the patch? :-) -- Rodrigo Moya From rodrigo@novell.com Mon Jun 12 17:45:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A628B3B0010 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 17:45:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32679-05 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 17:45:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from peabody.ximian.com (peabody.ximian.com [130.57.169.10]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 901D93B0072 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 17:45:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 22167 invoked from network); 12 Jun 2006 21:43:46 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?164.99.120.183?) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 12 Jun 2006 21:43:46 -0000 From: Rodrigo Moya To: gnome-announce-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 23:36:21 +0200 Message-Id: <1150148182.16907.0.camel@formigal.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.335 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-0.090, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE=0.2, TW_BX=0.077, TW_IB=0.077] X-Spam-Score: -2.335 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Control Center List Subject: control-center 2.15.3 released X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 21:45:54 -0000 Changes since 2.14.2 -------------------- about me: - Fixed typo (Rodrigo Moya) (324971) - Fixed compilation issues (Rodrigo Moya) (344468) default applications: - Added support for Sylpheed (Luca Cavalli) (332659) - Removed unnecessary gnome-terminal argument (Luca Cavalli) (336700) keybindings: - Removed brightness keybindings, now in gnome-power-manager (Bastien Nocera) (339857) keyboard: - Save/restore layout preview window geometry (Sergey Udaltsov) mouse: - Fixed selection when no cursor font is set in GConf (Darren Kenny) (340003) sound: - Added sound device selection (Jürg Billeter) (329112) - Fixed button strings (Rodrigo Moya) (324971) theme-switcher: - Removed drag & drop information text (Thomas Wood) (99535) - Added Install buttons to each tab in the details window (Thomas Wood) - Remember last browsed or installed from location (Thomas Wood) (138795) - Don't allow invalid characters in theme names (Thomas Wood) (139692) - Don't ask user whether to overwrite or not internal files (Thomas Wood) (317375) - Allow saving background image for custom themes (Thomas Wood) (330302) - Fixed UI issues in the save dialog (Thomas Wood) (100622) settings daemon: - Fixed libxklavier engine initialization logic (Sergey Udaltsov) (333091) - Removed references to brightness controls (Bastien Nocera) (339857) - Fixed leaks (Paolo Borelli) (342568, 342570) general: - Updated to new libxklavier API (Sergey Udaltsov) updated translations: - bg (Alexander Shopov) - cs (Miloslav Trmac, Lukas Novotny, Jakub Friedl) - dz (Pema Geyleg) - es (Francisco Javier F. Serrador) - fi (Ilkka Tuohela) - gl (Ignacio Casal Quinteiro) - gu (Ankit Patel) - mg (Simos Xenitellis) - nb (Kjartan Maraas) - sq (Laurent Dhima) - sv (Daniel Nylander) - th (Theppitak Karoonboonyanan) - vi (Clytie Siddall) - zh_CN (Funda Wang) - zh_HK (Chao-Hsiung Liao) - zh_TW (Chao-Hsiung Liao) Availability ------------ http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/control-center/2.15/ Contact ------- * Bugs in http://bugzilla.gnome.org * Mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomecc-list -- Rodrigo Moya From thos@gnome.org Fri Jun 16 06:26:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 531493B007A for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 06:26:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25585-02 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 06:26:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from orion.thos.me.uk (88-96-30-66.dsl.zen.co.uk [88.96.30.66]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E128F3B0011 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 06:26:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from changepp.gotadsl.co.uk ([62.3.227.107] helo=[192.168.20.137]) by orion.thos.me.uk with esmtpa (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1FrBV1-00015F-3a; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:24:23 +0100 Message-ID: <44928894.5090903@gnome.org> Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:31:48 +0100 From: Thomas Wood User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rodrigo Moya Subject: Re: Single Instance Capplets References: <20060610083042.99545.qmail@web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <1150111040.4035.8.camel@formigal.home> In-Reply-To: <1150111040.4035.8.camel@formigal.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.45 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.014, BAYES_00=-2.599, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.135] X-Spam-Score: -2.45 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Joachim Noreiko , gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 10:26:37 -0000 Rodrigo Moya wrote: > On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 01:30 -0700, Joachim Noreiko wrote: > >>> Since Iain has written up a nice article on how to implement single >>> >> instance programs with dbus[1], I'd like to know people's thoughts about >> implementing this in the capplets. >> >> There's a summer of code project related to this: http://live.gnome.org/SingleInstanceApps >> >> >> >>> I can't see any reason why any of the >>> >> capplets should be open more than once at a time >> >> Neither can I. >> >> > right, let's do it. Now that Sergey is going to commit his CORBA->DBUS > patch, we can use DBUS with no problem, so yeah, who's going to write > the patch? :-) > Well, I assume we wait for the Summer of Code project mentioned above to be completed, and then use that? -Thomas From thos@gnome.org Fri Jun 16 07:12:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60FFA3B0012 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 07:12:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26675-02 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 07:12:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from orion.thos.me.uk (88-96-30-66.dsl.zen.co.uk [88.96.30.66]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4048E3B007A for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 07:12:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from changepp.gotadsl.co.uk ([62.3.227.107] helo=[192.168.20.137]) by orion.thos.me.uk with esmtpa (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1FrBXE-00015P-55 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:26:40 +0100 Message-ID: <4492891D.9030005@gnome.org> Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:34:05 +0100 From: Thomas Wood User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Subject: Bugzilla Components Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.451 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.013, BAYES_00=-2.599, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.135] X-Spam-Score: -2.451 X-Spam-Level: X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:12:19 -0000 Would anyone object if I got bugzilla maintainer dummy accounts set up for each of the control center components, and then assigned them as the default QA contact? I want to track bugs in the theme switcher component, but I'm not really interested in all the other control center bugs. -Thomas From rodrigo@novell.com Fri Jun 16 08:23:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3D6F3B0076 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 08:23:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28295-04 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 08:23:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from peabody.ximian.com (peabody.ximian.com [130.57.169.10]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78F733B002C for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 08:23:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 25986 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2006 10:35:41 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO 164-99-120-49.boston.ximian.com) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Jun 2006 10:35:41 -0000 Subject: Re: Single Instance Capplets From: Rodrigo Moya To: Thomas Wood In-Reply-To: <44928894.5090903@gnome.org> References: <20060610083042.99545.qmail@web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <1150111040.4035.8.camel@formigal.home> <44928894.5090903@gnome.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 12:27:49 +0200 Message-Id: <1150453669.5204.13.camel@formigal.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.412 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-0.013, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE=0.2] X-Spam-Score: -2.412 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Joachim Noreiko , gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 12:23:01 -0000 On Fri, 2006-06-16 at 11:31 +0100, Thomas Wood wrote: > Rodrigo Moya wrote: > > On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 01:30 -0700, Joachim Noreiko wrote: > > > >>> Since Iain has written up a nice article on how to implement single > >>> > >> instance programs with dbus[1], I'd like to know people's thoughts about > >> implementing this in the capplets. > >> > >> There's a summer of code project related to this: http://live.gnome.org/SingleInstanceApps > >> > >> > >> > >>> I can't see any reason why any of the > >>> > >> capplets should be open more than once at a time > >> > >> Neither can I. > >> > >> > > right, let's do it. Now that Sergey is going to commit his CORBA->DBUS > > patch, we can use DBUS with no problem, so yeah, who's going to write > > the patch? :-) > > > Well, I assume we wait for the Summer of Code project mentioned above to > be completed, and then use that? > yeah, right -- Rodrigo Moya From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Mon Jun 5 05:58:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24D273B0810 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 05:58:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20398-03 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 05:58:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from peabody.ximian.com (peabody.ximian.com [130.57.169.10]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B5D53B031D for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 05:58:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 14268 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2006 09:58:02 -0000 Received: from outbound.ximian.com (HELO 164-99-120-128.boston.ximian.com) (130.57.170.250) by peabody.ximian.com with SMTP; 5 Jun 2006 09:58:02 -0000 From: Rodrigo Moya To: Sergey Udaltsov In-Reply-To: <48890e640605290110h64b6d956m6ace40f27da41d2b@mail.gmail.com> References: <1148680890.6716.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1148885409.3857.11.camel@arette.site> <48890e640605290110h64b6d956m6ace40f27da41d2b@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 11:57:00 +0200 Message-Id: <1149501420.12548.43.camel@cerler.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.561 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.038, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.561 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Control Center List Subject: Re: [Fwd: RFP: Keyboard Configuration Registry over dbus] X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 09:58:05 -0000 On Mon, 2006-05-29 at 09:10 +0100, Sergey Udaltsov wrote: > Hello Rodrigo, > > > and how will the DBUS interface look like? That is, will it send over > > the bus the whole XML file? > Well, this is a very good question. Let me explain. > There are two relatively separate tasks, as far as keyboard concerned: > - configuration (gnome-keyboard-properties capplet) > - indication (gnome-keyboard-indicator applet and any other app which > would need to indicate the current status) > > For the configuration purposes, we really need entire XML - that is > why I am going to leave g-k-p as it is - loading XML and working with > it locally. g-k-p lifetime is short, people run it very unfrequently, > so I do not think that making dbus interface very complex would be > adjusted by the potential benefits. > > But for the indication purposes, you need only several strings - the > descriptions of the currently loaded layouts. So at this point, I plan > only one function, returning 4 arrays of strings (short/long > descriptions or layouts/variants). This should be enough for the > applet and screensaver and any other indication purposes. > > Does this make sense to you? > well, I'm still not sure, Seb (or any other), any comment? > > This way, I don't think we'll use more RAM than what we use now. > Well, g-s-d will keep the parsed XML in memory - which will definitely > take some RAM. > right -- Rodrigo Moya From sergey.udaltsov@gmail.com Mon Jun 5 08:04:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3824E3B0751 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 08:04:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28553-05 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 08:04:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.170]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 598873B08AD for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 08:03:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so1221351uge for ; Mon, 05 Jun 2006 05:03:51 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=oQuXUzNHHLCNheSb0UXTeIxrK0V8zAomOClfwmgZhhjLYhh9glk1RMYjntDxkTyTGynJ2okSMaZQU7hAYsY2irFNaiem45wCmbhUYy8EYF4zeNVh/Nw0dX0a2YlG9b5CcxwkXqS5AUsX9S+Dz3LX62EWluLZEl8011AX408xjEI= Received: by 10.78.17.1 with SMTP id 1mr848292huq; Mon, 05 Jun 2006 05:03:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.26.5 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 05:03:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48890e640606050503i7da5e48dhca6d9d875d60d151@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 13:03:50 +0100 From: "Sergey Udaltsov" To: "Rodrigo Moya" In-Reply-To: <1149501420.12548.43.camel@cerler.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1148680890.6716.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1148885409.3857.11.camel@arette.site> <48890e640605290110h64b6d956m6ace40f27da41d2b@mail.gmail.com> <1149501420.12548.43.camel@cerler.home> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.171 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.428, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.171 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Control Center List Subject: Re: [Fwd: RFP: Keyboard Configuration Registry over dbus] X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 12:04:34 -0000 > well, I'm still not sure, Seb (or any other), any comment? Well, then how would you see this interface? I would not like to transfer entire huge DOM over DBUS - I'm afraid it would kill all the performance/memory gains... Sergey From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Mon Jun 5 09:19:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E20BC3B03B1 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 09:19:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01234-08 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 09:19:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from peabody.ximian.com (peabody.ximian.com [130.57.169.10]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EB923B0814 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 09:19:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 14395 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2006 13:19:13 -0000 Received: from outbound.ximian.com (HELO 164-99-120-128.boston.ximian.com) (130.57.170.250) by peabody.ximian.com with SMTP; 5 Jun 2006 13:19:13 -0000 From: Rodrigo Moya To: Sergey Udaltsov In-Reply-To: <48890e640606050503i7da5e48dhca6d9d875d60d151@mail.gmail.com> References: <1148680890.6716.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1148885409.3857.11.camel@arette.site> <48890e640605290110h64b6d956m6ace40f27da41d2b@mail.gmail.com> <1149501420.12548.43.camel@cerler.home> <48890e640606050503i7da5e48dhca6d9d875d60d151@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 15:18:12 +0200 Message-Id: <1149513492.17928.4.camel@cerler.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.561 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.038, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.561 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Control Center List Subject: Re: [Fwd: RFP: Keyboard Configuration Registry over dbus] X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 13:19:21 -0000 On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 13:03 +0100, Sergey Udaltsov wrote: > > well, I'm still not sure, Seb (or any other), any comment? > Well, then how would you see this interface? I would not like to > transfer entire huge DOM over DBUS - I'm afraid it would kill all the > performance/memory gains... > oh no, I don't want that neither :) I'm just not sure what the best would be, so let's go with your original plan unless there are other comments -- Rodrigo Moya From thos@gnome.org Fri Jun 9 10:18:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66E893B00DF for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 10:18:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30284-05 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 10:18:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from orion.thos.me.uk (88-96-30-66.dsl.zen.co.uk [88.96.30.66]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 294F43B0156 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 10:18:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from changepp.gotadsl.co.uk ([62.3.227.107] helo=[192.168.20.137]) by orion.thos.me.uk with esmtpa (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1FohnO-0008V6-Kk for ; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 15:17:06 +0100 Message-ID: <4489849A.4080603@gnome.org> Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 15:24:26 +0100 From: Thomas Wood User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.45 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.014, BAYES_00=-2.599, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.135] X-Spam-Score: -2.45 X-Spam-Level: Subject: Single Instance Capplets X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 14:18:10 -0000 Since Iain has written up a nice article on how to implement single instance programs with dbus[1], I'd like to know people's thoughts about implementing this in the capplets. I can't see any reason why any of the capplets should be open more than once at a time, and it has caused me confusion on more than one occasion (I assumed that trying to open the capplet again would raise the existing capplet, not open a second instance). It'd be nice to have this done the same way for all applets, so any thoughts and suggestions on how to implement this? -Thomas [1] http://www.o-hand.com/~iain/single-instance-with-dbus/making-single-instance-programs-with-dbus.html From jnoreiko@yahoo.com Sat Jun 10 04:30:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8576D3B034A for ; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 04:30:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19317-07 for ; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 04:30:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.207.206]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 579963B02ED for ; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 04:30:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 99547 invoked by uid 60001); 10 Jun 2006 08:30:42 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=dWZDEGMsY61OTGx0FcnOIBOxuUmxMDFGggGG1iubIqUwOEo5bcy/pLivxKoPSa+yMlF1q1MPIWQmS44zcsI+Iyd47mblnYnCQoVza+aRibh47rIfBywyoyAIAqxYDhmiq3l3h+b1UDg9vSOjfzJkT6euUjHGXzg7FnZcTaMcBdg= ; Message-ID: <20060610083042.99545.qmail@web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [172.141.114.46] by web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 01:30:42 PDT Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 01:30:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Joachim Noreiko To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <20060609160023.43AA03B024A@menubar.gnome.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.355 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-2.003, BAYES_50=0.001, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE=0.2, DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS=1.447] X-Spam-Score: -0.355 X-Spam-Level: Subject: Re: Single Instance Capplets X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Joachim Noreiko List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 08:30:44 -0000 > Since Iain has written up a nice article on how to implement single instance programs with dbus[1], I'd like to know people's thoughts about implementing this in the capplets. There's a summer of code project related to this: http://live.gnome.org/SingleInstanceApps > I can't see any reason why any of the capplets should be open more than once at a time Neither can I. From rodrigo@novell.com Mon Jun 12 07:25:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B5CA3B008A for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 07:25:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32032-08 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 07:25:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from peabody.ximian.com (peabody.ximian.com [130.57.169.10]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F2DB3B0083 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 07:25:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 21118 invoked from network); 12 Jun 2006 11:24:42 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO 164-99-120-91.boston.ximian.com) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 12 Jun 2006 11:24:42 -0000 From: Rodrigo Moya To: Joachim Noreiko In-Reply-To: <20060610083042.99545.qmail@web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <20060610083042.99545.qmail@web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 13:17:20 +0200 Message-Id: <1150111040.4035.8.camel@formigal.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.411 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-0.012, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE=0.2] X-Spam-Score: -2.411 X-Spam-Level: Cc: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: Single Instance Capplets X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 11:25:34 -0000 On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 01:30 -0700, Joachim Noreiko wrote: > > Since Iain has written up a nice article on how to implement single > instance programs with dbus[1], I'd like to know people's thoughts about > implementing this in the capplets. > > There's a summer of code project related to this: http://live.gnome.org/SingleInstanceApps > > > > I can't see any reason why any of the > capplets should be open more than once at a time > > Neither can I. > right, let's do it. Now that Sergey is going to commit his CORBA->DBUS patch, we can use DBUS with no problem, so yeah, who's going to write the patch? :-) -- Rodrigo Moya From rodrigo@novell.com Mon Jun 12 17:45:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A628B3B0010 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 17:45:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32679-05 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 17:45:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from peabody.ximian.com (peabody.ximian.com [130.57.169.10]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 901D93B0072 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 17:45:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 22167 invoked from network); 12 Jun 2006 21:43:46 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?164.99.120.183?) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 12 Jun 2006 21:43:46 -0000 From: Rodrigo Moya To: gnome-announce-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 23:36:21 +0200 Message-Id: <1150148182.16907.0.camel@formigal.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.335 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-0.090, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE=0.2, TW_BX=0.077, TW_IB=0.077] X-Spam-Score: -2.335 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Control Center List Subject: control-center 2.15.3 released X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 21:45:54 -0000 Changes since 2.14.2 -------------------- about me: - Fixed typo (Rodrigo Moya) (324971) - Fixed compilation issues (Rodrigo Moya) (344468) default applications: - Added support for Sylpheed (Luca Cavalli) (332659) - Removed unnecessary gnome-terminal argument (Luca Cavalli) (336700) keybindings: - Removed brightness keybindings, now in gnome-power-manager (Bastien Nocera) (339857) keyboard: - Save/restore layout preview window geometry (Sergey Udaltsov) mouse: - Fixed selection when no cursor font is set in GConf (Darren Kenny) (340003) sound: - Added sound device selection (Jürg Billeter) (329112) - Fixed button strings (Rodrigo Moya) (324971) theme-switcher: - Removed drag & drop information text (Thomas Wood) (99535) - Added Install buttons to each tab in the details window (Thomas Wood) - Remember last browsed or installed from location (Thomas Wood) (138795) - Don't allow invalid characters in theme names (Thomas Wood) (139692) - Don't ask user whether to overwrite or not internal files (Thomas Wood) (317375) - Allow saving background image for custom themes (Thomas Wood) (330302) - Fixed UI issues in the save dialog (Thomas Wood) (100622) settings daemon: - Fixed libxklavier engine initialization logic (Sergey Udaltsov) (333091) - Removed references to brightness controls (Bastien Nocera) (339857) - Fixed leaks (Paolo Borelli) (342568, 342570) general: - Updated to new libxklavier API (Sergey Udaltsov) updated translations: - bg (Alexander Shopov) - cs (Miloslav Trmac, Lukas Novotny, Jakub Friedl) - dz (Pema Geyleg) - es (Francisco Javier F. Serrador) - fi (Ilkka Tuohela) - gl (Ignacio Casal Quinteiro) - gu (Ankit Patel) - mg (Simos Xenitellis) - nb (Kjartan Maraas) - sq (Laurent Dhima) - sv (Daniel Nylander) - th (Theppitak Karoonboonyanan) - vi (Clytie Siddall) - zh_CN (Funda Wang) - zh_HK (Chao-Hsiung Liao) - zh_TW (Chao-Hsiung Liao) Availability ------------ http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/control-center/2.15/ Contact ------- * Bugs in http://bugzilla.gnome.org * Mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomecc-list -- Rodrigo Moya From thos@gnome.org Fri Jun 16 06:26:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 531493B007A for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 06:26:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25585-02 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 06:26:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from orion.thos.me.uk (88-96-30-66.dsl.zen.co.uk [88.96.30.66]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E128F3B0011 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 06:26:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from changepp.gotadsl.co.uk ([62.3.227.107] helo=[192.168.20.137]) by orion.thos.me.uk with esmtpa (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1FrBV1-00015F-3a; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:24:23 +0100 Message-ID: <44928894.5090903@gnome.org> Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:31:48 +0100 From: Thomas Wood User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rodrigo Moya Subject: Re: Single Instance Capplets References: <20060610083042.99545.qmail@web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <1150111040.4035.8.camel@formigal.home> In-Reply-To: <1150111040.4035.8.camel@formigal.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.45 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.014, BAYES_00=-2.599, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.135] X-Spam-Score: -2.45 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Joachim Noreiko , gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 10:26:37 -0000 Rodrigo Moya wrote: > On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 01:30 -0700, Joachim Noreiko wrote: > >>> Since Iain has written up a nice article on how to implement single >>> >> instance programs with dbus[1], I'd like to know people's thoughts about >> implementing this in the capplets. >> >> There's a summer of code project related to this: http://live.gnome.org/SingleInstanceApps >> >> >> >>> I can't see any reason why any of the >>> >> capplets should be open more than once at a time >> >> Neither can I. >> >> > right, let's do it. Now that Sergey is going to commit his CORBA->DBUS > patch, we can use DBUS with no problem, so yeah, who's going to write > the patch? :-) > Well, I assume we wait for the Summer of Code project mentioned above to be completed, and then use that? -Thomas From thos@gnome.org Fri Jun 16 07:12:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60FFA3B0012 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 07:12:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26675-02 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 07:12:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from orion.thos.me.uk (88-96-30-66.dsl.zen.co.uk [88.96.30.66]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4048E3B007A for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 07:12:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from changepp.gotadsl.co.uk ([62.3.227.107] helo=[192.168.20.137]) by orion.thos.me.uk with esmtpa (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1FrBXE-00015P-55 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:26:40 +0100 Message-ID: <4492891D.9030005@gnome.org> Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:34:05 +0100 From: Thomas Wood User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Subject: Bugzilla Components Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.451 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.013, BAYES_00=-2.599, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.135] X-Spam-Score: -2.451 X-Spam-Level: X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:12:19 -0000 Would anyone object if I got bugzilla maintainer dummy accounts set up for each of the control center components, and then assigned them as the default QA contact? I want to track bugs in the theme switcher component, but I'm not really interested in all the other control center bugs. -Thomas From rodrigo@novell.com Fri Jun 16 08:23:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3D6F3B0076 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 08:23:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28295-04 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 08:23:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from peabody.ximian.com (peabody.ximian.com [130.57.169.10]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78F733B002C for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 08:23:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 25986 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2006 10:35:41 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO 164-99-120-49.boston.ximian.com) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Jun 2006 10:35:41 -0000 Subject: Re: Single Instance Capplets From: Rodrigo Moya To: Thomas Wood In-Reply-To: <44928894.5090903@gnome.org> References: <20060610083042.99545.qmail@web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <1150111040.4035.8.camel@formigal.home> <44928894.5090903@gnome.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 12:27:49 +0200 Message-Id: <1150453669.5204.13.camel@formigal.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.412 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-0.013, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE=0.2] X-Spam-Score: -2.412 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Joachim Noreiko , gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 12:23:01 -0000 On Fri, 2006-06-16 at 11:31 +0100, Thomas Wood wrote: > Rodrigo Moya wrote: > > On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 01:30 -0700, Joachim Noreiko wrote: > > > >>> Since Iain has written up a nice article on how to implement single > >>> > >> instance programs with dbus[1], I'd like to know people's thoughts about > >> implementing this in the capplets. > >> > >> There's a summer of code project related to this: http://live.gnome.org/SingleInstanceApps > >> > >> > >> > >>> I can't see any reason why any of the > >>> > >> capplets should be open more than once at a time > >> > >> Neither can I. > >> > >> > > right, let's do it. Now that Sergey is going to commit his CORBA->DBUS > > patch, we can use DBUS with no problem, so yeah, who's going to write > > the patch? :-) > > > Well, I assume we wait for the Summer of Code project mentioned above to > be completed, and then use that? > yeah, right -- Rodrigo Moya From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Mon Jun 5 05:58:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24D273B0810 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 05:58:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20398-03 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 05:58:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from peabody.ximian.com (peabody.ximian.com [130.57.169.10]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B5D53B031D for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 05:58:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 14268 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2006 09:58:02 -0000 Received: from outbound.ximian.com (HELO 164-99-120-128.boston.ximian.com) (130.57.170.250) by peabody.ximian.com with SMTP; 5 Jun 2006 09:58:02 -0000 From: Rodrigo Moya To: Sergey Udaltsov In-Reply-To: <48890e640605290110h64b6d956m6ace40f27da41d2b@mail.gmail.com> References: <1148680890.6716.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1148885409.3857.11.camel@arette.site> <48890e640605290110h64b6d956m6ace40f27da41d2b@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 11:57:00 +0200 Message-Id: <1149501420.12548.43.camel@cerler.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.561 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.038, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.561 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Control Center List Subject: Re: [Fwd: RFP: Keyboard Configuration Registry over dbus] X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 09:58:05 -0000 On Mon, 2006-05-29 at 09:10 +0100, Sergey Udaltsov wrote: > Hello Rodrigo, > > > and how will the DBUS interface look like? That is, will it send over > > the bus the whole XML file? > Well, this is a very good question. Let me explain. > There are two relatively separate tasks, as far as keyboard concerned: > - configuration (gnome-keyboard-properties capplet) > - indication (gnome-keyboard-indicator applet and any other app which > would need to indicate the current status) > > For the configuration purposes, we really need entire XML - that is > why I am going to leave g-k-p as it is - loading XML and working with > it locally. g-k-p lifetime is short, people run it very unfrequently, > so I do not think that making dbus interface very complex would be > adjusted by the potential benefits. > > But for the indication purposes, you need only several strings - the > descriptions of the currently loaded layouts. So at this point, I plan > only one function, returning 4 arrays of strings (short/long > descriptions or layouts/variants). This should be enough for the > applet and screensaver and any other indication purposes. > > Does this make sense to you? > well, I'm still not sure, Seb (or any other), any comment? > > This way, I don't think we'll use more RAM than what we use now. > Well, g-s-d will keep the parsed XML in memory - which will definitely > take some RAM. > right -- Rodrigo Moya From sergey.udaltsov@gmail.com Mon Jun 5 08:04:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3824E3B0751 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 08:04:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28553-05 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 08:04:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.170]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 598873B08AD for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 08:03:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so1221351uge for ; Mon, 05 Jun 2006 05:03:51 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=oQuXUzNHHLCNheSb0UXTeIxrK0V8zAomOClfwmgZhhjLYhh9glk1RMYjntDxkTyTGynJ2okSMaZQU7hAYsY2irFNaiem45wCmbhUYy8EYF4zeNVh/Nw0dX0a2YlG9b5CcxwkXqS5AUsX9S+Dz3LX62EWluLZEl8011AX408xjEI= Received: by 10.78.17.1 with SMTP id 1mr848292huq; Mon, 05 Jun 2006 05:03:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.26.5 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 05:03:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48890e640606050503i7da5e48dhca6d9d875d60d151@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 13:03:50 +0100 From: "Sergey Udaltsov" To: "Rodrigo Moya" In-Reply-To: <1149501420.12548.43.camel@cerler.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1148680890.6716.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1148885409.3857.11.camel@arette.site> <48890e640605290110h64b6d956m6ace40f27da41d2b@mail.gmail.com> <1149501420.12548.43.camel@cerler.home> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.171 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.428, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.171 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Control Center List Subject: Re: [Fwd: RFP: Keyboard Configuration Registry over dbus] X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 12:04:34 -0000 > well, I'm still not sure, Seb (or any other), any comment? Well, then how would you see this interface? I would not like to transfer entire huge DOM over DBUS - I'm afraid it would kill all the performance/memory gains... Sergey From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Mon Jun 5 09:19:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E20BC3B03B1 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 09:19:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01234-08 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 09:19:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from peabody.ximian.com (peabody.ximian.com [130.57.169.10]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EB923B0814 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 09:19:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 14395 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2006 13:19:13 -0000 Received: from outbound.ximian.com (HELO 164-99-120-128.boston.ximian.com) (130.57.170.250) by peabody.ximian.com with SMTP; 5 Jun 2006 13:19:13 -0000 From: Rodrigo Moya To: Sergey Udaltsov In-Reply-To: <48890e640606050503i7da5e48dhca6d9d875d60d151@mail.gmail.com> References: <1148680890.6716.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1148885409.3857.11.camel@arette.site> <48890e640605290110h64b6d956m6ace40f27da41d2b@mail.gmail.com> <1149501420.12548.43.camel@cerler.home> <48890e640606050503i7da5e48dhca6d9d875d60d151@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 15:18:12 +0200 Message-Id: <1149513492.17928.4.camel@cerler.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.561 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.038, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.561 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Control Center List Subject: Re: [Fwd: RFP: Keyboard Configuration Registry over dbus] X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 13:19:21 -0000 On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 13:03 +0100, Sergey Udaltsov wrote: > > well, I'm still not sure, Seb (or any other), any comment? > Well, then how would you see this interface? I would not like to > transfer entire huge DOM over DBUS - I'm afraid it would kill all the > performance/memory gains... > oh no, I don't want that neither :) I'm just not sure what the best would be, so let's go with your original plan unless there are other comments -- Rodrigo Moya From thos@gnome.org Fri Jun 9 10:18:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66E893B00DF for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 10:18:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30284-05 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 10:18:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from orion.thos.me.uk (88-96-30-66.dsl.zen.co.uk [88.96.30.66]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 294F43B0156 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 10:18:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from changepp.gotadsl.co.uk ([62.3.227.107] helo=[192.168.20.137]) by orion.thos.me.uk with esmtpa (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1FohnO-0008V6-Kk for ; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 15:17:06 +0100 Message-ID: <4489849A.4080603@gnome.org> Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 15:24:26 +0100 From: Thomas Wood User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.45 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.014, BAYES_00=-2.599, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.135] X-Spam-Score: -2.45 X-Spam-Level: Subject: Single Instance Capplets X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 14:18:10 -0000 Since Iain has written up a nice article on how to implement single instance programs with dbus[1], I'd like to know people's thoughts about implementing this in the capplets. I can't see any reason why any of the capplets should be open more than once at a time, and it has caused me confusion on more than one occasion (I assumed that trying to open the capplet again would raise the existing capplet, not open a second instance). It'd be nice to have this done the same way for all applets, so any thoughts and suggestions on how to implement this? -Thomas [1] http://www.o-hand.com/~iain/single-instance-with-dbus/making-single-instance-programs-with-dbus.html From jnoreiko@yahoo.com Sat Jun 10 04:30:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8576D3B034A for ; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 04:30:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19317-07 for ; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 04:30:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.207.206]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 579963B02ED for ; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 04:30:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 99547 invoked by uid 60001); 10 Jun 2006 08:30:42 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=dWZDEGMsY61OTGx0FcnOIBOxuUmxMDFGggGG1iubIqUwOEo5bcy/pLivxKoPSa+yMlF1q1MPIWQmS44zcsI+Iyd47mblnYnCQoVza+aRibh47rIfBywyoyAIAqxYDhmiq3l3h+b1UDg9vSOjfzJkT6euUjHGXzg7FnZcTaMcBdg= ; Message-ID: <20060610083042.99545.qmail@web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [172.141.114.46] by web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 01:30:42 PDT Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 01:30:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Joachim Noreiko To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <20060609160023.43AA03B024A@menubar.gnome.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.355 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-2.003, BAYES_50=0.001, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE=0.2, DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS=1.447] X-Spam-Score: -0.355 X-Spam-Level: Subject: Re: Single Instance Capplets X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Joachim Noreiko List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 08:30:44 -0000 > Since Iain has written up a nice article on how to implement single instance programs with dbus[1], I'd like to know people's thoughts about implementing this in the capplets. There's a summer of code project related to this: http://live.gnome.org/SingleInstanceApps > I can't see any reason why any of the capplets should be open more than once at a time Neither can I. From rodrigo@novell.com Mon Jun 12 07:25:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B5CA3B008A for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 07:25:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32032-08 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 07:25:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from peabody.ximian.com (peabody.ximian.com [130.57.169.10]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F2DB3B0083 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 07:25:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 21118 invoked from network); 12 Jun 2006 11:24:42 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO 164-99-120-91.boston.ximian.com) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 12 Jun 2006 11:24:42 -0000 From: Rodrigo Moya To: Joachim Noreiko In-Reply-To: <20060610083042.99545.qmail@web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <20060610083042.99545.qmail@web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 13:17:20 +0200 Message-Id: <1150111040.4035.8.camel@formigal.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.411 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-0.012, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE=0.2] X-Spam-Score: -2.411 X-Spam-Level: Cc: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: Single Instance Capplets X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 11:25:34 -0000 On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 01:30 -0700, Joachim Noreiko wrote: > > Since Iain has written up a nice article on how to implement single > instance programs with dbus[1], I'd like to know people's thoughts about > implementing this in the capplets. > > There's a summer of code project related to this: http://live.gnome.org/SingleInstanceApps > > > > I can't see any reason why any of the > capplets should be open more than once at a time > > Neither can I. > right, let's do it. Now that Sergey is going to commit his CORBA->DBUS patch, we can use DBUS with no problem, so yeah, who's going to write the patch? :-) -- Rodrigo Moya From rodrigo@novell.com Mon Jun 12 17:45:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A628B3B0010 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 17:45:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32679-05 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 17:45:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from peabody.ximian.com (peabody.ximian.com [130.57.169.10]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 901D93B0072 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 17:45:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 22167 invoked from network); 12 Jun 2006 21:43:46 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?164.99.120.183?) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 12 Jun 2006 21:43:46 -0000 From: Rodrigo Moya To: gnome-announce-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 23:36:21 +0200 Message-Id: <1150148182.16907.0.camel@formigal.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.335 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-0.090, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE=0.2, TW_BX=0.077, TW_IB=0.077] X-Spam-Score: -2.335 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Control Center List Subject: control-center 2.15.3 released X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 21:45:54 -0000 Changes since 2.14.2 -------------------- about me: - Fixed typo (Rodrigo Moya) (324971) - Fixed compilation issues (Rodrigo Moya) (344468) default applications: - Added support for Sylpheed (Luca Cavalli) (332659) - Removed unnecessary gnome-terminal argument (Luca Cavalli) (336700) keybindings: - Removed brightness keybindings, now in gnome-power-manager (Bastien Nocera) (339857) keyboard: - Save/restore layout preview window geometry (Sergey Udaltsov) mouse: - Fixed selection when no cursor font is set in GConf (Darren Kenny) (340003) sound: - Added sound device selection (Jürg Billeter) (329112) - Fixed button strings (Rodrigo Moya) (324971) theme-switcher: - Removed drag & drop information text (Thomas Wood) (99535) - Added Install buttons to each tab in the details window (Thomas Wood) - Remember last browsed or installed from location (Thomas Wood) (138795) - Don't allow invalid characters in theme names (Thomas Wood) (139692) - Don't ask user whether to overwrite or not internal files (Thomas Wood) (317375) - Allow saving background image for custom themes (Thomas Wood) (330302) - Fixed UI issues in the save dialog (Thomas Wood) (100622) settings daemon: - Fixed libxklavier engine initialization logic (Sergey Udaltsov) (333091) - Removed references to brightness controls (Bastien Nocera) (339857) - Fixed leaks (Paolo Borelli) (342568, 342570) general: - Updated to new libxklavier API (Sergey Udaltsov) updated translations: - bg (Alexander Shopov) - cs (Miloslav Trmac, Lukas Novotny, Jakub Friedl) - dz (Pema Geyleg) - es (Francisco Javier F. Serrador) - fi (Ilkka Tuohela) - gl (Ignacio Casal Quinteiro) - gu (Ankit Patel) - mg (Simos Xenitellis) - nb (Kjartan Maraas) - sq (Laurent Dhima) - sv (Daniel Nylander) - th (Theppitak Karoonboonyanan) - vi (Clytie Siddall) - zh_CN (Funda Wang) - zh_HK (Chao-Hsiung Liao) - zh_TW (Chao-Hsiung Liao) Availability ------------ http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/control-center/2.15/ Contact ------- * Bugs in http://bugzilla.gnome.org * Mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomecc-list -- Rodrigo Moya From thos@gnome.org Fri Jun 16 06:26:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 531493B007A for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 06:26:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25585-02 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 06:26:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from orion.thos.me.uk (88-96-30-66.dsl.zen.co.uk [88.96.30.66]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E128F3B0011 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 06:26:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from changepp.gotadsl.co.uk ([62.3.227.107] helo=[192.168.20.137]) by orion.thos.me.uk with esmtpa (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1FrBV1-00015F-3a; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:24:23 +0100 Message-ID: <44928894.5090903@gnome.org> Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:31:48 +0100 From: Thomas Wood User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rodrigo Moya Subject: Re: Single Instance Capplets References: <20060610083042.99545.qmail@web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <1150111040.4035.8.camel@formigal.home> In-Reply-To: <1150111040.4035.8.camel@formigal.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.45 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.014, BAYES_00=-2.599, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.135] X-Spam-Score: -2.45 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Joachim Noreiko , gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 10:26:37 -0000 Rodrigo Moya wrote: > On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 01:30 -0700, Joachim Noreiko wrote: > >>> Since Iain has written up a nice article on how to implement single >>> >> instance programs with dbus[1], I'd like to know people's thoughts about >> implementing this in the capplets. >> >> There's a summer of code project related to this: http://live.gnome.org/SingleInstanceApps >> >> >> >>> I can't see any reason why any of the >>> >> capplets should be open more than once at a time >> >> Neither can I. >> >> > right, let's do it. Now that Sergey is going to commit his CORBA->DBUS > patch, we can use DBUS with no problem, so yeah, who's going to write > the patch? :-) > Well, I assume we wait for the Summer of Code project mentioned above to be completed, and then use that? -Thomas From thos@gnome.org Fri Jun 16 07:12:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60FFA3B0012 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 07:12:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26675-02 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 07:12:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from orion.thos.me.uk (88-96-30-66.dsl.zen.co.uk [88.96.30.66]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4048E3B007A for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 07:12:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from changepp.gotadsl.co.uk ([62.3.227.107] helo=[192.168.20.137]) by orion.thos.me.uk with esmtpa (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1FrBXE-00015P-55 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:26:40 +0100 Message-ID: <4492891D.9030005@gnome.org> Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:34:05 +0100 From: Thomas Wood User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Subject: Bugzilla Components Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.451 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.013, BAYES_00=-2.599, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.135] X-Spam-Score: -2.451 X-Spam-Level: X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:12:19 -0000 Would anyone object if I got bugzilla maintainer dummy accounts set up for each of the control center components, and then assigned them as the default QA contact? I want to track bugs in the theme switcher component, but I'm not really interested in all the other control center bugs. -Thomas From rodrigo@novell.com Fri Jun 16 08:23:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3D6F3B0076 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 08:23:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28295-04 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 08:23:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from peabody.ximian.com (peabody.ximian.com [130.57.169.10]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78F733B002C for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 08:23:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 25986 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2006 10:35:41 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO 164-99-120-49.boston.ximian.com) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Jun 2006 10:35:41 -0000 Subject: Re: Single Instance Capplets From: Rodrigo Moya To: Thomas Wood In-Reply-To: <44928894.5090903@gnome.org> References: <20060610083042.99545.qmail@web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <1150111040.4035.8.camel@formigal.home> <44928894.5090903@gnome.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 12:27:49 +0200 Message-Id: <1150453669.5204.13.camel@formigal.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.412 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-0.013, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE=0.2] X-Spam-Score: -2.412 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Joachim Noreiko , gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 12:23:01 -0000 On Fri, 2006-06-16 at 11:31 +0100, Thomas Wood wrote: > Rodrigo Moya wrote: > > On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 01:30 -0700, Joachim Noreiko wrote: > > > >>> Since Iain has written up a nice article on how to implement single > >>> > >> instance programs with dbus[1], I'd like to know people's thoughts about > >> implementing this in the capplets. > >> > >> There's a summer of code project related to this: http://live.gnome.org/SingleInstanceApps > >> > >> > >> > >>> I can't see any reason why any of the > >>> > >> capplets should be open more than once at a time > >> > >> Neither can I. > >> > >> > > right, let's do it. Now that Sergey is going to commit his CORBA->DBUS > > patch, we can use DBUS with no problem, so yeah, who's going to write > > the patch? :-) > > > Well, I assume we wait for the Summer of Code project mentioned above to > be completed, and then use that? > yeah, right -- Rodrigo Moya From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Mon Jun 5 05:58:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24D273B0810 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 05:58:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20398-03 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 05:58:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from peabody.ximian.com (peabody.ximian.com [130.57.169.10]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B5D53B031D for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 05:58:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 14268 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2006 09:58:02 -0000 Received: from outbound.ximian.com (HELO 164-99-120-128.boston.ximian.com) (130.57.170.250) by peabody.ximian.com with SMTP; 5 Jun 2006 09:58:02 -0000 From: Rodrigo Moya To: Sergey Udaltsov In-Reply-To: <48890e640605290110h64b6d956m6ace40f27da41d2b@mail.gmail.com> References: <1148680890.6716.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1148885409.3857.11.camel@arette.site> <48890e640605290110h64b6d956m6ace40f27da41d2b@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 11:57:00 +0200 Message-Id: <1149501420.12548.43.camel@cerler.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.561 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.038, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.561 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Control Center List Subject: Re: [Fwd: RFP: Keyboard Configuration Registry over dbus] X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 09:58:05 -0000 On Mon, 2006-05-29 at 09:10 +0100, Sergey Udaltsov wrote: > Hello Rodrigo, > > > and how will the DBUS interface look like? That is, will it send over > > the bus the whole XML file? > Well, this is a very good question. Let me explain. > There are two relatively separate tasks, as far as keyboard concerned: > - configuration (gnome-keyboard-properties capplet) > - indication (gnome-keyboard-indicator applet and any other app which > would need to indicate the current status) > > For the configuration purposes, we really need entire XML - that is > why I am going to leave g-k-p as it is - loading XML and working with > it locally. g-k-p lifetime is short, people run it very unfrequently, > so I do not think that making dbus interface very complex would be > adjusted by the potential benefits. > > But for the indication purposes, you need only several strings - the > descriptions of the currently loaded layouts. So at this point, I plan > only one function, returning 4 arrays of strings (short/long > descriptions or layouts/variants). This should be enough for the > applet and screensaver and any other indication purposes. > > Does this make sense to you? > well, I'm still not sure, Seb (or any other), any comment? > > This way, I don't think we'll use more RAM than what we use now. > Well, g-s-d will keep the parsed XML in memory - which will definitely > take some RAM. > right -- Rodrigo Moya From sergey.udaltsov@gmail.com Mon Jun 5 08:04:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3824E3B0751 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 08:04:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28553-05 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 08:04:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.170]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 598873B08AD for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 08:03:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so1221351uge for ; Mon, 05 Jun 2006 05:03:51 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=oQuXUzNHHLCNheSb0UXTeIxrK0V8zAomOClfwmgZhhjLYhh9glk1RMYjntDxkTyTGynJ2okSMaZQU7hAYsY2irFNaiem45wCmbhUYy8EYF4zeNVh/Nw0dX0a2YlG9b5CcxwkXqS5AUsX9S+Dz3LX62EWluLZEl8011AX408xjEI= Received: by 10.78.17.1 with SMTP id 1mr848292huq; Mon, 05 Jun 2006 05:03:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.26.5 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 05:03:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48890e640606050503i7da5e48dhca6d9d875d60d151@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 13:03:50 +0100 From: "Sergey Udaltsov" To: "Rodrigo Moya" In-Reply-To: <1149501420.12548.43.camel@cerler.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1148680890.6716.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1148885409.3857.11.camel@arette.site> <48890e640605290110h64b6d956m6ace40f27da41d2b@mail.gmail.com> <1149501420.12548.43.camel@cerler.home> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.171 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.428, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.171 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Control Center List Subject: Re: [Fwd: RFP: Keyboard Configuration Registry over dbus] X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 12:04:34 -0000 > well, I'm still not sure, Seb (or any other), any comment? Well, then how would you see this interface? I would not like to transfer entire huge DOM over DBUS - I'm afraid it would kill all the performance/memory gains... Sergey From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Mon Jun 5 09:19:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E20BC3B03B1 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 09:19:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01234-08 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 09:19:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from peabody.ximian.com (peabody.ximian.com [130.57.169.10]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EB923B0814 for ; Mon, 5 Jun 2006 09:19:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 14395 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2006 13:19:13 -0000 Received: from outbound.ximian.com (HELO 164-99-120-128.boston.ximian.com) (130.57.170.250) by peabody.ximian.com with SMTP; 5 Jun 2006 13:19:13 -0000 From: Rodrigo Moya To: Sergey Udaltsov In-Reply-To: <48890e640606050503i7da5e48dhca6d9d875d60d151@mail.gmail.com> References: <1148680890.6716.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1148885409.3857.11.camel@arette.site> <48890e640605290110h64b6d956m6ace40f27da41d2b@mail.gmail.com> <1149501420.12548.43.camel@cerler.home> <48890e640606050503i7da5e48dhca6d9d875d60d151@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 15:18:12 +0200 Message-Id: <1149513492.17928.4.camel@cerler.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.561 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.038, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.561 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Control Center List Subject: Re: [Fwd: RFP: Keyboard Configuration Registry over dbus] X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 13:19:21 -0000 On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 13:03 +0100, Sergey Udaltsov wrote: > > well, I'm still not sure, Seb (or any other), any comment? > Well, then how would you see this interface? I would not like to > transfer entire huge DOM over DBUS - I'm afraid it would kill all the > performance/memory gains... > oh no, I don't want that neither :) I'm just not sure what the best would be, so let's go with your original plan unless there are other comments -- Rodrigo Moya From thos@gnome.org Fri Jun 9 10:18:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66E893B00DF for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 10:18:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30284-05 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 10:18:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from orion.thos.me.uk (88-96-30-66.dsl.zen.co.uk [88.96.30.66]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 294F43B0156 for ; Fri, 9 Jun 2006 10:18:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from changepp.gotadsl.co.uk ([62.3.227.107] helo=[192.168.20.137]) by orion.thos.me.uk with esmtpa (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1FohnO-0008V6-Kk for ; Fri, 09 Jun 2006 15:17:06 +0100 Message-ID: <4489849A.4080603@gnome.org> Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 15:24:26 +0100 From: Thomas Wood User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.45 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.014, BAYES_00=-2.599, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.135] X-Spam-Score: -2.45 X-Spam-Level: Subject: Single Instance Capplets X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 14:18:10 -0000 Since Iain has written up a nice article on how to implement single instance programs with dbus[1], I'd like to know people's thoughts about implementing this in the capplets. I can't see any reason why any of the capplets should be open more than once at a time, and it has caused me confusion on more than one occasion (I assumed that trying to open the capplet again would raise the existing capplet, not open a second instance). It'd be nice to have this done the same way for all applets, so any thoughts and suggestions on how to implement this? -Thomas [1] http://www.o-hand.com/~iain/single-instance-with-dbus/making-single-instance-programs-with-dbus.html From jnoreiko@yahoo.com Sat Jun 10 04:30:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8576D3B034A for ; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 04:30:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19317-07 for ; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 04:30:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.207.206]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 579963B02ED for ; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 04:30:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 99547 invoked by uid 60001); 10 Jun 2006 08:30:42 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=dWZDEGMsY61OTGx0FcnOIBOxuUmxMDFGggGG1iubIqUwOEo5bcy/pLivxKoPSa+yMlF1q1MPIWQmS44zcsI+Iyd47mblnYnCQoVza+aRibh47rIfBywyoyAIAqxYDhmiq3l3h+b1UDg9vSOjfzJkT6euUjHGXzg7FnZcTaMcBdg= ; Message-ID: <20060610083042.99545.qmail@web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [172.141.114.46] by web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 01:30:42 PDT Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 01:30:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Joachim Noreiko To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <20060609160023.43AA03B024A@menubar.gnome.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.355 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-2.003, BAYES_50=0.001, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE=0.2, DNS_FROM_RFC_WHOIS=1.447] X-Spam-Score: -0.355 X-Spam-Level: Subject: Re: Single Instance Capplets X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Joachim Noreiko List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 08:30:44 -0000 > Since Iain has written up a nice article on how to implement single instance programs with dbus[1], I'd like to know people's thoughts about implementing this in the capplets. There's a summer of code project related to this: http://live.gnome.org/SingleInstanceApps > I can't see any reason why any of the capplets should be open more than once at a time Neither can I. From rodrigo@novell.com Mon Jun 12 07:25:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B5CA3B008A for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 07:25:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32032-08 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 07:25:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from peabody.ximian.com (peabody.ximian.com [130.57.169.10]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F2DB3B0083 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 07:25:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 21118 invoked from network); 12 Jun 2006 11:24:42 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO 164-99-120-91.boston.ximian.com) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 12 Jun 2006 11:24:42 -0000 From: Rodrigo Moya To: Joachim Noreiko In-Reply-To: <20060610083042.99545.qmail@web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <20060610083042.99545.qmail@web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 13:17:20 +0200 Message-Id: <1150111040.4035.8.camel@formigal.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.411 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-0.012, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE=0.2] X-Spam-Score: -2.411 X-Spam-Level: Cc: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: Single Instance Capplets X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 11:25:34 -0000 On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 01:30 -0700, Joachim Noreiko wrote: > > Since Iain has written up a nice article on how to implement single > instance programs with dbus[1], I'd like to know people's thoughts about > implementing this in the capplets. > > There's a summer of code project related to this: http://live.gnome.org/SingleInstanceApps > > > > I can't see any reason why any of the > capplets should be open more than once at a time > > Neither can I. > right, let's do it. Now that Sergey is going to commit his CORBA->DBUS patch, we can use DBUS with no problem, so yeah, who's going to write the patch? :-) -- Rodrigo Moya From rodrigo@novell.com Mon Jun 12 17:45:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A628B3B0010 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 17:45:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32679-05 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 17:45:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from peabody.ximian.com (peabody.ximian.com [130.57.169.10]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 901D93B0072 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2006 17:45:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 22167 invoked from network); 12 Jun 2006 21:43:46 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?164.99.120.183?) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 12 Jun 2006 21:43:46 -0000 From: Rodrigo Moya To: gnome-announce-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 23:36:21 +0200 Message-Id: <1150148182.16907.0.camel@formigal.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.335 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-0.090, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE=0.2, TW_BX=0.077, TW_IB=0.077] X-Spam-Score: -2.335 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Control Center List Subject: control-center 2.15.3 released X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 21:45:54 -0000 Changes since 2.14.2 -------------------- about me: - Fixed typo (Rodrigo Moya) (324971) - Fixed compilation issues (Rodrigo Moya) (344468) default applications: - Added support for Sylpheed (Luca Cavalli) (332659) - Removed unnecessary gnome-terminal argument (Luca Cavalli) (336700) keybindings: - Removed brightness keybindings, now in gnome-power-manager (Bastien Nocera) (339857) keyboard: - Save/restore layout preview window geometry (Sergey Udaltsov) mouse: - Fixed selection when no cursor font is set in GConf (Darren Kenny) (340003) sound: - Added sound device selection (Jürg Billeter) (329112) - Fixed button strings (Rodrigo Moya) (324971) theme-switcher: - Removed drag & drop information text (Thomas Wood) (99535) - Added Install buttons to each tab in the details window (Thomas Wood) - Remember last browsed or installed from location (Thomas Wood) (138795) - Don't allow invalid characters in theme names (Thomas Wood) (139692) - Don't ask user whether to overwrite or not internal files (Thomas Wood) (317375) - Allow saving background image for custom themes (Thomas Wood) (330302) - Fixed UI issues in the save dialog (Thomas Wood) (100622) settings daemon: - Fixed libxklavier engine initialization logic (Sergey Udaltsov) (333091) - Removed references to brightness controls (Bastien Nocera) (339857) - Fixed leaks (Paolo Borelli) (342568, 342570) general: - Updated to new libxklavier API (Sergey Udaltsov) updated translations: - bg (Alexander Shopov) - cs (Miloslav Trmac, Lukas Novotny, Jakub Friedl) - dz (Pema Geyleg) - es (Francisco Javier F. Serrador) - fi (Ilkka Tuohela) - gl (Ignacio Casal Quinteiro) - gu (Ankit Patel) - mg (Simos Xenitellis) - nb (Kjartan Maraas) - sq (Laurent Dhima) - sv (Daniel Nylander) - th (Theppitak Karoonboonyanan) - vi (Clytie Siddall) - zh_CN (Funda Wang) - zh_HK (Chao-Hsiung Liao) - zh_TW (Chao-Hsiung Liao) Availability ------------ http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/control-center/2.15/ Contact ------- * Bugs in http://bugzilla.gnome.org * Mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomecc-list -- Rodrigo Moya From thos@gnome.org Fri Jun 16 06:26:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 531493B007A for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 06:26:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25585-02 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 06:26:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from orion.thos.me.uk (88-96-30-66.dsl.zen.co.uk [88.96.30.66]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E128F3B0011 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 06:26:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from changepp.gotadsl.co.uk ([62.3.227.107] helo=[192.168.20.137]) by orion.thos.me.uk with esmtpa (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1FrBV1-00015F-3a; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:24:23 +0100 Message-ID: <44928894.5090903@gnome.org> Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:31:48 +0100 From: Thomas Wood User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rodrigo Moya Subject: Re: Single Instance Capplets References: <20060610083042.99545.qmail@web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <1150111040.4035.8.camel@formigal.home> In-Reply-To: <1150111040.4035.8.camel@formigal.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.45 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.014, BAYES_00=-2.599, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.135] X-Spam-Score: -2.45 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Joachim Noreiko , gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 10:26:37 -0000 Rodrigo Moya wrote: > On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 01:30 -0700, Joachim Noreiko wrote: > >>> Since Iain has written up a nice article on how to implement single >>> >> instance programs with dbus[1], I'd like to know people's thoughts about >> implementing this in the capplets. >> >> There's a summer of code project related to this: http://live.gnome.org/SingleInstanceApps >> >> >> >>> I can't see any reason why any of the >>> >> capplets should be open more than once at a time >> >> Neither can I. >> >> > right, let's do it. Now that Sergey is going to commit his CORBA->DBUS > patch, we can use DBUS with no problem, so yeah, who's going to write > the patch? :-) > Well, I assume we wait for the Summer of Code project mentioned above to be completed, and then use that? -Thomas From thos@gnome.org Fri Jun 16 07:12:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60FFA3B0012 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 07:12:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26675-02 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 07:12:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from orion.thos.me.uk (88-96-30-66.dsl.zen.co.uk [88.96.30.66]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4048E3B007A for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 07:12:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from changepp.gotadsl.co.uk ([62.3.227.107] helo=[192.168.20.137]) by orion.thos.me.uk with esmtpa (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1FrBXE-00015P-55 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:26:40 +0100 Message-ID: <4492891D.9030005@gnome.org> Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:34:05 +0100 From: Thomas Wood User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Subject: Bugzilla Components Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.451 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.013, BAYES_00=-2.599, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.135] X-Spam-Score: -2.451 X-Spam-Level: X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:12:19 -0000 Would anyone object if I got bugzilla maintainer dummy accounts set up for each of the control center components, and then assigned them as the default QA contact? I want to track bugs in the theme switcher component, but I'm not really interested in all the other control center bugs. -Thomas From rodrigo@novell.com Fri Jun 16 08:23:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3D6F3B0076 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 08:23:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28295-04 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 08:23:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from peabody.ximian.com (peabody.ximian.com [130.57.169.10]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78F733B002C for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 08:23:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 25986 invoked from network); 16 Jun 2006 10:35:41 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO 164-99-120-49.boston.ximian.com) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Jun 2006 10:35:41 -0000 Subject: Re: Single Instance Capplets From: Rodrigo Moya To: Thomas Wood In-Reply-To: <44928894.5090903@gnome.org> References: <20060610083042.99545.qmail@web32413.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <1150111040.4035.8.camel@formigal.home> <44928894.5090903@gnome.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 12:27:49 +0200 Message-Id: <1150453669.5204.13.camel@formigal.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.412 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-0.013, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE=0.2] X-Spam-Score: -2.412 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Joachim Noreiko , gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 12:23:01 -0000 On Fri, 2006-06-16 at 11:31 +0100, Thomas Wood wrote: > Rodrigo Moya wrote: > > On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 01:30 -0700, Joachim Noreiko wrote: > > > >>> Since Iain has written up a nice article on how to implement single > >>> > >> instance programs with dbus[1], I'd like to know people's thoughts about > >> implementing this in the capplets. > >> > >> There's a summer of code project related to this: http://live.gnome.org/SingleInstanceApps > >> > >> > >> > >>> I can't see any reason why any of the > >>> > >> capplets should be open more than once at a time > >> > >> Neither can I. > >> > >> > > right, let's do it. Now that Sergey is going to commit his CORBA->DBUS > > patch, we can use DBUS with no problem, so yeah, who's going to write > > the patch? :-) > > > Well, I assume we wait for the Summer of Code project mentioned above to > be completed, and then use that? > yeah, right -- Rodrigo Moya