GNOME.org

2005-February Archive by Author

Messages sorted by: [ Thread ] [ Date ] [ Author ]
Other months

Bill Haneman

Re: GNOME 2.10 Beta 2 Public Testing Release Fri Feb 11 12:05:11 GMT 2005
Re: GNOME 2.10 Beta 2 Public Testing Release Fri Feb 11 13:51:56 GMT 2005

Elijah Newren

Re: houston, we have a problem- 2.10 showstoppers Mon Feb 28 17:35:49 GMT 2005
Re: houston, we have a problem- 2.10 showstoppers Mon Feb 28 21:05:09 GMT 2005
Re: patch nag- 600+ unreviewed patches in bugzilla Thu Feb 03 19:37:35 GMT 2005
Re: vte [was Re: houston, we have a problem- 2.10 showstoppers] Mon Feb 28 17:41:19 GMT 2005
Re: houston, we have a problem- 2.10 showstoppers Mon Feb 28 18:27:42 GMT 2005
Re: houston, we have a problem- 2.10 showstoppers Mon Feb 28 23:55:31 GMT 2005

Havoc Pennington

Re: houston, we have a problem- 2.10 showstoppers Mon Feb 28 18:21:48 GMT 2005
Re: houston, we have a problem- 2.10 showstoppers Mon Feb 28 17:32:07 GMT 2005
Re: houston, we have a problem- 2.10 showstoppers Mon Feb 28 18:22:03 GMT 2005
Re: houston, we have a problem- 2.10 showstoppers Mon Feb 28 17:39:57 GMT 2005

Jeff Waugh

Re: GNOME 2.10 Beta 2 Public Testing Release Fri Feb 11 12:51:55 GMT 2005

Jim Gettys

Re: houston, we have a problem- 2.10 showstoppers Mon Feb 28 17:45:07 GMT 2005

Kjartan Maraas

Re: vte [was Re: houston, we have a problem- 2.10 showstoppers] Mon Feb 28 22:14:30 GMT 2005
Re: houston, we have a problem- 2.10 showstoppers Mon Feb 28 22:14:25 GMT 2005

Luis Villa

Re: patch nag- 600+ unreviewed patches in bugzilla Thu Feb 03 19:41:59 GMT 2005
houston, we have a problem- 2.10 showstoppers Mon Feb 28 15:44:05 GMT 2005
Re: houston, we have a problem- 2.10 showstoppers Mon Feb 28 17:58:01 GMT 2005
vte [was Re: houston, we have a problem- 2.10 showstoppers] Mon Feb 28 16:47:17 GMT 2005
Re: houston, we have a problem- 2.10 showstoppers Mon Feb 28 18:01:35 GMT 2005

Markus Bertheau

Re: patch nag- 600+ unreviewed patches in bugzilla Fri Feb 04 08:08:55 GMT 2005

Murray Cumming

Re: GNOME 2.10 Beta 2 Public Testing Release Fri Feb 11 12:46:59 GMT 2005

Nalin Dahyabhai

Re: vte [was Re: houston, we have a problem- 2.10 showstoppers] Mon Feb 28 22:14:29 GMT 2005

Not Zed

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Re: Information about hacking on Evolution Mon Feb 21 00:54:22 GMT 2005
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Re: Information about hacking on Evolution Mon Feb 21 00:43:52 GMT 2005

Philip Van Hoof

[Evolution-hackers] Re: Information about hacking on Evolution Fri Feb 18 20:15:21 GMT 2005
Information about hacking on Evolution Thu Feb 17 22:44:20 GMT 2005
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Information about hacking on Evolution Thu Feb 24 21:34:06 GMT 2005
Re: Information about hacking on Evolution Fri Feb 18 20:15:21 GMT 2005
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Re: Information about hacking on Evolution Mon Feb 21 10:32:29 GMT 2005

Ray Strode

Re: houston, we have a problem- 2.10 showstoppers Mon Feb 28 22:14:27 GMT 2005

Rodrigo Moya

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Re: Information about hacking on Evolution Mon Feb 21 10:32:09 GMT 2005
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Re: Information about hacking on Evolution Mon Feb 21 10:32:08 GMT 2005
[Evolution-hackers] Re: Information about hacking on Evolution Fri Feb 18 20:15:19 GMT 2005
Re: Information about hacking on Evolution Fri Feb 18 13:41:48 GMT 2005

Ross Golder

Re: houston, we have a problem- 2.10 showstoppers Mon Feb 28 16:18:40 GMT 2005
Re: GNOME list moderator service Sat Feb 19 04:05:02 GMT 2005

Rui Miguel Seabra

Re: GNOME list moderator service Sat Feb 12 11:25:08 GMT 2005

Sven Herzberg

Re: vte [was Re: houston, we have a problem- 2.10 showstoppers] Mon Feb 28 22:14:26 GMT 2005

Vincent Untz

Re: houston, we have a problem- 2.10 showstoppers Mon Feb 28 22:25:09 GMT 2005
Re: houston, we have a problem- 2.10 showstoppers Mon Feb 28 16:02:34 GMT 2005
Re: houston, we have a problem- 2.10 showstoppers Mon Feb 28 18:14:56 GMT 2005

Mail converted by MHonArc