Re: LAS 2018 Budget Approval for Denver, Colorado

HI Carlos (and board),

On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 6:29 AM Carlos Soriano <csoriano gnome org> wrote:
Hello Sri,

First, apologies for the delay answering. We just want to state that we believe LAS initiative is good and well intended, and the board thanks the LAS team for their effort.

During our call the board discussed worries about paying the venue cost up front if the conference is not going to be more focused on GNOME. We were also concerned about the lack of GNOME branding of the conference.

For the former issue, an idea that was proposed is to have a minimum percentage of GNOME talks and people from GNOME attending LAS, although other ideas are welcome. We are happy to evaluate a new proposal coming from the LAS team addressing these issues.

Completely understand your position.  Let me confer with my team and we will get back to you.

Carlos Soriano
GNOME Board of Directors

On 10 January 2018 at 16:25, Allan Day <aday gnome org> wrote:
Hey Sri and Nuritzi,

I felt that I was too negative during yesterday's call, and that I didn't express myself as clearly as I would have liked, so I wanted to follow up.

I want to reiterate my support for LAS. I also want to emphasise that the points I raised are mostly personal suggestions for how to improve the event.

My main point is that an event that's targeted at application developers is different from one that's targeted at platform developers, and I'm not sure it's possible to come up with a schedule that successfully addresses these two different audiences. Perhaps picking one (I think it should probably be app developers) over the other would also help you to have better targeted talks and clearer marketing.

My second point is to ask whether the focus is too broad. I get the point about not drawing the circle too tightly, and inclusion of rivals is to be expected (I don't see why GTK, Qt and Electron all shouldn't be there, for example). However, I do feel that treating all the application distribution technologies equally might not be beneficial.

My feeling is that there needs to be some coherence to the stack that's being promoted at LAS, both to provide clarity for application developers and to try and influence the platform in a positive way. A slightly tighter focus would also probably lead to a better event, by giving attendees a common focus and frame of reference.

To be clear, I'm not saying that Snap or AppImage (or any others) should be explicitly excluded, but I do think it would help to have Flatpak and Freedesktop as a focus.



On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Sriram Ramkrishna <sri ramkrishna me> wrote:

Hi Allan!

On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 4:26 AM Allan Day <aday gnome org> wrote:
meg ford <megford gnome org> wrote:
>>>  * I'm interested to know how you plan on advertising the relationship
>>> between GNOME and LAS. Will LAS be advertised as being sponsored by
>>> the GNOME Foundation? Will it use GNOME branding?
>> This year, you'll notice that we no longer use LAS GNOME.  We have removed
>> the GNOME branding and now the conference is called Libre Application
>> Summit.  This is so that we can be more inclusive and is not perceived as a
>> GNOME conference.
>> I'm learning towards not mentioning GNOME other than as a contributing
>> sponsor and will be at equal footing with everyone else.  The website will
>> not be part of the, and instead we will be using or
>> some other domain that is descriptive of the purpose.  From there, we want
>> to follow a similar formula as flathub and have an organizing location on
>> the Internet for Libre Applications.  We will want to create an organization
>> that supports this conference independently going forward.  We hope to
>> create close ties with flathub, toolkits, and distros.
>  I understood that the eventual goal was for this conference to outgrow
> GNOME, but the idea that this is not a GNOME conference this year causes a
> lot of issues that I don't see addressed by the proposal.

My personal view: when the idea of broadening the scope of LAS was
previously discussed, I'd imagined (and I think discussed with
someone... maybe Neil?) that the event would develop its own identity
and focus, but would have some secondary GNOME Foundation branding.
You could imagine the conference title with a GNOME Foundation badge
to one side. Or "LAS" and then below "brought to you by the GNOME
Foundation" or "a GNOME Foundation event". The GNOME brand wouldn't be
primary, and it wouldn't be in the conference name, but it would still
be generally present.

That is correct.  In fact, the reason we have a GiNA is precisely to cohost the two conferences together as part of incubation and then release LAS so that it travels around the world.  So LAS and GiNA were to be cohosted for a couple of years and then LAS moves independently without GNOME to help it along.

I'll have a follow up with the options in about an hour.  Thanks for waiting guys, and I really appreciate your forbearance on this issue.




>From time to time confidential and sensitive information will be discussed
on this mailing list. Please take care to mark confidential information as
confidential, and do not redistribute this information without permission.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]