[Ekiga-list] non-standard port number usage

[Patriiiiiiiiiick]

On 9/5/06, Damien Sandras <dsandras at seconix.com> wrote:
> I see this :
> Sending PDU on udp$82.146.119.38:6060<if=udp$85.28.110.200:5063>
>
> The port is 6060 ...

hmmm, ... Should I consider all those lines not relevant?

061:2006/09/04 23:08:06.044	
0:13.191	GMAccounts...t:083b2768	OpalUDP	Started connect to
82.146.119.38:5060
098:2006/09/04 23:08:06.078	
0:13.225	GMAccounts...t:083b2768	SIP	Created Transport for Registrar
udp$82.146.119.38:5060<if=udp$85.28.110.200:5064>
099:2006/09/04 23:08:06.081	
0:13.228	GMAccounts...t:083b2768	SIP	Sending PDU on
udp$82.146.119.38:5060<if=udp$85.28.110.200:5064>
117:2006/09/04 23:08:06.083	  0:13.230	  SIP
Transport:84723b0	SIP	Waiting for PDU on
udp$82.146.119.38:5060<if=udp$85.28.110.200:5064>
134:2006/09/04 23:08:06.582	  0:13.729	
Housekeeper	SIP	Sending PDU on
udp$82.146.119.38:5060<if=udp$85.28.110.200:5064>
154:2006/09/04 23:08:07.586	  0:14.733	
Housekeeper	SIP	Sending PDU on
udp$82.146.119.38:5060<if=udp$85.28.110.200:5064>
172:2006/09/04 23:08:09.590	  0:16.737	
Housekeeper	SIP	Sending PDU on
udp$82.146.119.38:5060<if=udp$85.28.110.200:5064>

I added the line number at the beginning of the line.

What do you think? For sure, there is a part of truth in there as when
verifying this with Ethereal, I see that I am getting ICMP packets for
the port 5060.

Patrick