From smckenzie@borland.com Mon Mar 31 19:44:20 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: xslt@gnome.org Received: from outgoing.borland.com (unknown [143.186.72.221]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24232180FD for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 19:44:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from borland.com (bigip-snat.inprise.com [10.186.98.50]) by sv-mta1.inprise.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.10 (built Jan 23 2003)) with ESMTP id <0HCN00JHF3DUFV@sv-mta1.inprise.com> for xslt@gnome.org; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 16:44:18 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 16:48:17 -0800 From: "Shawn O. McKenzie" To: xslt@gnome.org Message-id: <3E88E1D1.6010709@borland.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Accept-Language: en-us, en User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02 Subject: [xslt] libxslt bug? stripping namespace prefix in element output. Sender: xslt-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: xslt-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: xslt@gnome.org X-Loop: xslt@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: xslt@gnome.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: The Gnome XSLT library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Howdee. I have been beating my head against a problem and am wondering if it is a bug. I am having problems outputing elements in an html file that have a different namespace prefix. Something like Here is a simple example. Given an XML file of: And a stylesheet of:

I get an output of: onetwothreefour So, it seems to be stripping the foo: prefix off the foo:whatever element. Does this using both xsltproc and Python. Seems to work fine on Microsoft's processor and on Saxon. From veillard@redhat.com Tue Apr 1 04:31:40 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: xslt@gnome.org Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com [66.187.233.200]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2186E182DE for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 04:31:38 -0500 (EST) Received: (from veillard@localhost) by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.0) id h319TOE05051; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 04:29:24 -0500 Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 04:29:24 -0500 From: Daniel Veillard To: smckenzie@borland.com Cc: xslt@gnome.org Subject: Re: [xslt] libxslt bug? stripping namespace prefix in element output. Message-ID: <20030401042924.G31240@redhat.com> References: <3E88E1D1.6010709@borland.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <3E88E1D1.6010709@borland.com>; from smckenzie@borland.com on Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 04:48:17PM -0800 Sender: xslt-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: xslt-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: xslt@gnome.org X-Loop: xslt@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: xslt@gnome.org X-Reply-To: veillard@redhat.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: The Gnome XSLT library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 04:48:17PM -0800, Shawn O. McKenzie wrote: > Howdee. > > I have been beating my head against a problem and am wondering if it is > a bug. I am having problems outputing elements in an html file that have > a different namespace prefix. Something like Term="foo"/> [...] > > I get an output of: > > > onetwothreefour > > > So, it seems to be stripping the foo: prefix off the foo:whatever > element. Does this using both xsltproc and Python. Seems to work fine on > Microsoft's processor and on Saxon. As pointed by http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/bugs.html the first thing to do is to check with a recent version. Since you don't indicate it I'm pretty sure it's just that you're using an older one, this has been fixed a few releases ago in libxml2. So upgrade ! paphio:~/tmp -> xsltproc tst.xsl tst.xml onetwothreefour paphio:~/tmp -> But your report was useful anyway, as you can see there was a bug in the namespace handling resulting in repeated xmlns:foo declarations. I fixed it in CVS and added it to the regression tests: paphio:~/tmp -> xsltproc tst.xsl tst.xml onetwothreefour paphio:~/tmp -> This looks better, thanks, Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/ veillard@redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ From veillard@redhat.com Tue Apr 1 09:29:45 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: xslt@gnome.org Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com [66.187.233.200]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D4B218A9B for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 09:29:45 -0500 (EST) Received: (from veillard@localhost) by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.0) id h31ETej14388 for xslt@gnome.org; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 09:29:40 -0500 Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 09:29:40 -0500 From: Daniel Veillard To: xslt@gnome.org Message-ID: <20030401092940.I31240@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i Subject: [xslt] Release of libxslt-1.0.29 Sender: xslt-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: xslt-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: xslt@gnome.org X-Loop: xslt@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: xslt@gnome.org X-Reply-To: veillard@redhat.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: The Gnome XSLT library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: It's a real release, not an April Fool joke ! ftp://xmlsoft.org/ http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/ This includes a few bug fixes from last week release and a significant speedup for large (flat) documents which also requires libxml2-2.5.6: * performance improvements especially for large flat documents * bug fixes: Result Value Tree handling, XML IDs, keys(), extra namespace declarations with xsl:elements. * portability: python and trio fixes (Albert Chin), python on Solaris (Ben Phillips) Thanks for the bug reports and patches, Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/ veillard@redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ From gena01@lk.net Tue Apr 1 15:18:47 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: xslt@gnome.org Received: from capital.lk.net (capital.lk.net [207.87.225.1]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2FAB18B78 for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 15:18:47 -0500 (EST) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by capital.lk.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h31KIlM24817; Tue, 1 Apr 2003 15:18:47 -0500 Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 15:18:47 -0500 Message-Id: <200304012018.h31KIlM24817@capital.lk.net> X-Authentication-Warning: capital.lk.net: nobody set sender to gena01@lk.net using -f From: "Gennady Feldman" To: xslt@gnome.org Subject: Re: [xslt] Release of libxslt-1.0.29 X-Mailer: NeoMail 1.23 X-IPAddress: 198.140.63.114 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Sender: xslt-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: xslt-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: xslt@gnome.org X-Loop: xslt@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: xslt@gnome.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: The Gnome XSLT library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: > It's a real release, not an April Fool joke ! > ftp://xmlsoft.org/ > http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/ > > This includes a few bug fixes from last week release and a significant > speedup for large (flat) documents which also requires libxml2-2.5.6: > * performance improvements especially for large flat documents > * bug fixes: Result Value Tree handling, XML IDs, keys(), extra namespace > declarations with xsl:elements. > * portability: python and trio fixes (Albert Chin), python on Solaris > (Ben Phillips) > > Thanks for the bug reports and patches, > > Daniel > [clipped] First of all great work on the latest releases of libxml2 and libxslt. I had some issues with our work proxy, took me like 2-3 hours to finally download the source files using FTP (was truncating the files). I am recompiling all of them right now. A couple of things that I needed to do to get the stuff compiling. Currently the way I compile stuff is extract the .tar.gz archives and do "aclocal" "autoconf" "configure" then edit Makefile change "rpmbuild" to "rpm" and then do "make rpm". In latest releases I had to edit the docs/Makefile since it wouldn't build because of some xml2-refs.xml file (or something close to that) until I removed it as a dependency. Also doing "rpm --rebuild" on libxslt .src.rpm doesn't work since somehow it doesn't generate the libraries and fails during build. I am doing a similar approach using the .tar.gz w/ "make rpm". Oh yeah almost forgot somehow Makefile uses "gtar" instead of regular "tar". I am on Suse 8.0 system w/ an old rpm (3.0.6) G.F. aka Gena01 http://www.gena01.com From ke@suse.de Wed Apr 2 09:47:52 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: xslt@gnome.org Received: from Cantor.suse.de (ns.suse.de [213.95.15.193]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A894D18106 for ; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 09:47:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from Hermes.suse.de (Hermes.suse.de [213.95.15.136]) by Cantor.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA13714783; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 16:47:51 +0200 (MEST) X-Authentication-Warning: frechet.suse.de: ke set sender to ke@suse.de using -f To: xslt@gnome.org Cc: gena01@lk.net Subject: Re: [xslt] Release of libxslt-1.0.29 From: Karl Eichwalder Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 16:47:49 +0200 In-Reply-To: <200304012018.h31KIlM24817@capital.lk.net> ("Gennady Feldman"'s message of "Tue, 1 Apr 2003 15:18:47 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090017 (Oort Gnus v0.17) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) References: <200304012018.h31KIlM24817@capital.lk.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: xslt-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: xslt-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: xslt@gnome.org X-Loop: xslt@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: xslt@gnome.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: The Gnome XSLT library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: "Gennady Feldman" writes: > First of all great work on the latest releases of libxml2 and libxslt. I > had some issues with our work proxy, took me like 2-3 hours to finally > download the source files using FTP (was truncating the files). Often I've good luck with: ftp://ftp.linux.org.uk/mirrors/ftp.gnome.org/sources/ > I am recompiling all of them right now. A couple of things that I > needed to do to get the stuff compiling. Currently the way I compile > stuff is extract the .tar.gz archives and do "aclocal" "autoconf" > "configure" That's what I'm usually doing, too. You can try the spec files coming with my test builds resp. source RPMs: ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/ke/SRPM/ > I am on Suse 8.0 system w/ an old rpm (3.0.6) If wanted I can also build RPMs for SuSE Linux 8.0; at the moment, on ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/ke only 8.1 and 8.2 is up-to-date. Just drop me a line. -- Linux frechet 2.4.19-4GB #1 Thu Nov 14 11:46:51 UTC 2002 i686 unknown 4:41pm up 11 days, 2:02, 11 users, load average: 0.17, 0.31, 0.48 work : ke@suse.de Karl Eichwalder home : keichwa@gmx.net From sbwoodside@yahoo.com Thu Apr 3 01:48:21 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: xslt@gnome.org Received: from tomts22-srv.bellnexxia.net (tomts22.bellnexxia.net [209.226.175.184]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13A7818104 for ; Thu, 3 Apr 2003 01:48:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from yahoo.com ([65.93.184.5]) by tomts22-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.04.19 201-253-122-122-119-20020516) with ESMTP id <20030403064820.SOIJ25567.tomts22-srv.bellnexxia.net@yahoo.com>; Thu, 3 Apr 2003 01:48:20 -0500 Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 01:48:19 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v551) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed From: S Woodside To: axkit-users@axkit.org, xslt@gnome.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <411C83E4-65A0-11D7-9A55-000393414368@yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.551) Subject: [xslt] more on the xslt namespace pipeline issue Sender: xslt-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: xslt-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: xslt@gnome.org X-Loop: xslt@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: xslt@gnome.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: The Gnome XSLT library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Here's another go at the pipeline namespace problem. AxKit is 1.6.1 Using libxml 20425, libxslt 10019 and libexslt 710 /=======================================================\ a_instance.xml The source document. \=======================================================/ /=======================================================\ test1.xml This is applied to the above instance file. \=======================================================/ RNG Form /=======================================================\ b_instance.xml This file is the product of the command: % xsltproc test1.xsl a_instance.xml Or equivalently it is the same as the file from AxTrace named "_2fa_instance.xml.1" They are the same, which is as things should be. \=======================================================/ RNG Form /=======================================================\ test2.xml This is applied to b_instance, the above file, when it's loaded with AxKit. It's also applied to a_instance, the first file, as the second stage, when that's loaded with AxKit. Note how various different namespacing prefixes are used (or not used) ... that will reveal the bug. \=======================================================/

[should be followed by text]

[should be followed by nothing]

[should be in h1]

/=======================================================\ OUTPUT A http://localhost/exp/bug1/a_instance.xml Demonstrates the incorrect output. \=======================================================/ RNG Form

[should be followed by text]

[should be followed by nothing] RNG Form /=======================================================\ OUTPUT B http://localhost/exp/bug1/b_instance.xml Demonstrates the correct output. \=======================================================/

[should be in h1] RNG Form

[should be followed by text] RNG Form

[should be followed by nothing] From robin.berjon@expway.fr Thu Apr 3 04:20:17 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: xslt@gnome.org Received: from mwinf0404.wanadoo.fr (smtp3.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.27]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13FD31817F for ; Thu, 3 Apr 2003 04:20:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from expway.fr (APastourelles-107-2-4-235.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.252.9.235]) by mwinf0404.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id B0F3D38002C6; Thu, 3 Apr 2003 11:20:13 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <3E8BFC51.9010100@expway.fr> Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2003 11:18:09 +0200 From: Robin Berjon Organization: Expway User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 X-Accept-Language: en-gb, en, fr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: S Woodside Cc: axkit-users@axkit.org, xslt@gnome.org References: <411C83E4-65A0-11D7-9A55-000393414368@yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <411C83E4-65A0-11D7-9A55-000393414368@yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [xslt] Re: more on the xslt namespace pipeline issue Sender: xslt-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: xslt-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: xslt@gnome.org X-Loop: xslt@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: xslt@gnome.org X-Reply-To: robin.berjon@expway.fr List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: The Gnome XSLT library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: S Woodside wrote: > Here's another go at the pipeline namespace problem. > AxKit is 1.6.1 > Using libxml 20425, libxslt 10019 and libexslt 710 And at last we have the answer! It's pretty simple actually. One *crucial* thing to know here is that in AxKit, the two passes don't have an intermediate XML step, a DOM is passed straight from the first stylesheet to the second one. Using xsltproc, that is not the case: there is a temporary intermediate XML document stored in a file. Let's narrow down to the problem: > /=======================================================\ > test1.xml > This is applied to the above instance file. > \=======================================================/ > > xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform" > version="1.0" > > > > > > > RNG Form > > > > Here you are creating three nested elements: btest in no namespace, rngform in the http://simonwoodside.com/rng namespace, and (important) title in no namespace. Using the JC notation, that is: {}btest {http://simonwoodside.com/rng}rngform {}title When passing a DOM around, what I believe is the correct namespace information will be passed around. However when you save to an intermediate file you get this: > > > RNG Form > > As we can see, thanks to namespace defaulting, we now have: {}btest {http://simonwoodside.com/rng}rngform {http://simonwoodside.com/rng}}title Which is an entirely different document. Properly serialising that would have required libxml to add xmlns='' on title, except that's only possible starting with namespaces 1.1. Another option would have been to add a random prefix to rngform, but that wouldn't be nice. Unless I am solidly mistaken on how XSLT should treat namespace contexts in xsl:element, the bug is yours and the AxKit processing pipeline expresses the most logical output. IIRC xsl:element/@name takes a QName. You should thus be able to fix your bug with: RNG Form which should generate: RNG Form -- Robin Berjon Research Engineer, Expway http://expway.fr/ 7FC0 6F5F D864 EFB8 08CE 8E74 58E6 D5DB 4889 2488 From veillard@redhat.com Thu Apr 3 04:35:48 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: xslt@gnome.org Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com [66.187.233.200]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E523318284 for ; Thu, 3 Apr 2003 04:35:47 -0500 (EST) Received: (from veillard@localhost) by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.0) id h339Zkh24386; Thu, 3 Apr 2003 04:35:46 -0500 Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 04:35:46 -0500 From: Daniel Veillard To: S Woodside Cc: xslt@gnome.org, axkit-users@axkit.org Subject: Re: [xslt] Re: more on the xslt namespace pipeline issue Message-ID: <20030403043546.S31240@redhat.com> References: <411C83E4-65A0-11D7-9A55-000393414368@yahoo.com> <3E8BFC51.9010100@expway.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <3E8BFC51.9010100@expway.fr>; from robin.berjon@expway.fr on Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 11:18:09AM +0200 Sender: xslt-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: xslt-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: xslt@gnome.org X-Loop: xslt@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: xslt@gnome.org X-Reply-To: veillard@redhat.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: The Gnome XSLT library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 11:18:09AM +0200, Robin Berjon wrote: > S Woodside wrote: > > Here's another go at the pipeline namespace problem. > > AxKit is 1.6.1 > > Using libxml 20425, libxslt 10019 and libexslt 710 Okay, I'm not happy at all !!! Very first thing to do is to UPGRADE :-(( Sorry, libxslt 10019 is from July 6 2002. Not taking the time to upgrade while it's explicitely asked for in the bug reporting page show no respects for the development and bug fixing efforts done. Why should I look at your report in more detail or try to reproduce the problem if you don't even do that basic step. If the bug was already fixed, how would you know ? Even if this is a problem in the current release you would have to upgrade anyway, so what ? Please have the basic courtesy to upgrade to the latest versions and report before asking for more help ! Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/ veillard@redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ From veillard@redhat.com Thu Apr 3 04:40:06 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: xslt@gnome.org Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com [66.187.233.200]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C669D18118 for ; Thu, 3 Apr 2003 04:40:05 -0500 (EST) Received: (from veillard@localhost) by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.0) id h339e5a25592; Thu, 3 Apr 2003 04:40:05 -0500 Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 04:40:05 -0500 From: Daniel Veillard To: xslt@gnome.org Cc: S Woodside , axkit-users@axkit.org Subject: Re: [xslt] Re: more on the xslt namespace pipeline issue Message-ID: <20030403044005.T31240@redhat.com> References: <411C83E4-65A0-11D7-9A55-000393414368@yahoo.com> <3E8BFC51.9010100@expway.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <3E8BFC51.9010100@expway.fr>; from robin.berjon@expway.fr on Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 11:18:09AM +0200 Sender: xslt-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: xslt-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: xslt@gnome.org X-Loop: xslt@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: xslt@gnome.org X-Reply-To: veillard@redhat.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: The Gnome XSLT library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 11:18:09AM +0200, Robin Berjon wrote: > Which is an entirely different document. Properly serialising that would have > required libxml to add xmlns='' on title, And I believe that had been fixed in the lasts releases, Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/ veillard@redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ From sbwoodside@yahoo.com Thu Apr 3 16:49:27 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: xslt@gnome.org Received: from tomts12-srv.bellnexxia.net (tomts12.bellnexxia.net [209.226.175.56]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04E3818118 for ; Thu, 3 Apr 2003 16:49:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from yahoo.com ([65.93.181.251]) by tomts12-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.04.19 201-253-122-122-119-20020516) with ESMTP id <20030403214925.ZOH20288.tomts12-srv.bellnexxia.net@yahoo.com>; Thu, 3 Apr 2003 16:49:25 -0500 Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2003 16:49:27 -0500 Subject: Re: [xslt] Re: more on the xslt namespace pipeline issue Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v551) Cc: xslt@gnome.org, axkit-users@axkit.org, Benjamin Reed To: veillard@redhat.com From: S Woodside In-Reply-To: <20030403043546.S31240@redhat.com> Message-Id: <243474A6-661E-11D7-9A55-000393414368@yahoo.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.551) Sender: xslt-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: xslt-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: xslt@gnome.org X-Loop: xslt@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: xslt@gnome.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: The Gnome XSLT library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Thursday, April 3, 2003, at 04:35 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote: >> S Woodside wrote: >>> Here's another go at the pipeline namespace problem. >>> AxKit is 1.6.1 >>> Using libxml 20425, libxslt 10019 and libexslt 710 > Okay, I'm not happy at all !!! Very first thing to do is to UPGRADE > :-(( Aeia! I am sorry. I guess that I am using the latest from the fink package system on Mac OS X but it is out of date. I see latest is 1.0.29 so I will download and install that manually ... Simon From sbwoodside@yahoo.com Fri Apr 4 01:19:11 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: xslt@gnome.org Received: from tomts8-srv.bellnexxia.net (tomts8.bellnexxia.net [209.226.175.52]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 836F4181B5 for ; Fri, 4 Apr 2003 01:19:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from yahoo.com ([65.93.181.251]) by tomts8-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.04.19 201-253-122-122-119-20020516) with ESMTP id <20030404061909.GUZJ18377.tomts8-srv.bellnexxia.net@yahoo.com>; Fri, 4 Apr 2003 01:19:09 -0500 Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 01:19:09 -0500 Subject: Re: [xslt] Re: more on the xslt namespace pipeline issue Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v551) Cc: xslt@gnome.org, axkit-users@axkit.org To: veillard@redhat.com From: S Woodside In-Reply-To: <20030403044005.T31240@redhat.com> Message-Id: <589BB218-6665-11D7-9DB7-000393414368@yahoo.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.551) Sender: xslt-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: xslt-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: xslt@gnome.org X-Loop: xslt@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: xslt@gnome.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: The Gnome XSLT library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Thursday, April 3, 2003, at 04:40 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote: > On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 11:18:09AM +0200, Robin Berjon wrote: >> Which is an entirely different document. Properly serialising that >> would have >> required libxml to add xmlns='' on title, > > And I believe that had been fixed in the lasts releases, OK -- I'm now running Using libxml 20506, libxslt 10027 and libexslt 718 xsltproc was compiled against libxml 20506, libxslt 10027 and libexslt 718 libxslt 10027 was compiled against libxml 20506 libexslt 718 was compiled against libxml 20506 from fink and the bug is still present. I'll install 1.0.29 next and see what happens with that. simon > > Daniel > > -- > Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/ > veillard@redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit > http://xmlsoft.org/ > http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ > > -- www.simonwoodside.com -- 99% Devil, 1% Angel From jpesenti@yahoo.com Fri Apr 4 08:27:31 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: xslt@gnome.org Received: from web12303.mail.yahoo.com (web12303.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.173.101]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7371B180EE for ; Fri, 4 Apr 2003 08:27:31 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20030404132731.3263.qmail@web12303.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [12.101.25.68] by web12303.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 04 Apr 2003 05:27:31 PST Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 05:27:31 -0800 (PST) From: Jerome Pesenti To: xslt@gnome.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: [xslt] Exslt support Sender: xslt-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: xslt-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: xslt@gnome.org X-Loop: xslt@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: xslt@gnome.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: The Gnome XSLT library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Is there an ongoing effort to implement the remaining exslt functionalities not yet supported? If so, is there a timeline? Can we help? Regards, Jerome __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more http://tax.yahoo.com From veillard@redhat.com Fri Apr 4 08:45:12 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: xslt@gnome.org Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com [66.187.233.200]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6076B180EE for ; Fri, 4 Apr 2003 08:45:12 -0500 (EST) Received: (from veillard@localhost) by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.0) id h34DjBj29097 for xslt@gnome.org; Fri, 4 Apr 2003 08:45:11 -0500 Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 08:45:11 -0500 From: Daniel Veillard To: xslt@gnome.org Subject: Re: [xslt] Exslt support Message-ID: <20030404084511.I31240@redhat.com> References: <20030404132731.3263.qmail@web12303.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20030404132731.3263.qmail@web12303.mail.yahoo.com>; from jpesenti@yahoo.com on Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 05:27:31AM -0800 Sender: xslt-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: xslt-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: xslt@gnome.org X-Loop: xslt@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: xslt@gnome.org X-Reply-To: veillard@redhat.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: The Gnome XSLT library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 05:27:31AM -0800, Jerome Pesenti wrote: > Is there an ongoing effort to implement the > remaining exslt functionalities not yet supported? If > so, is there a timeline? Can we help? There is no clear effort toward completing them. So far people contributed pieces when they needed it and they were missing. I take patches :-) Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/ veillard@redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ From jpesenti@yahoo.com Fri Apr 4 09:02:27 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: xslt@gnome.org Received: from web12306.mail.yahoo.com (web12306.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.173.104]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 108C918582 for ; Fri, 4 Apr 2003 09:02:27 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20030404140226.41974.qmail@web12306.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [12.101.25.68] by web12306.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 04 Apr 2003 06:02:26 PST Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 06:02:26 -0800 (PST) From: Jerome Pesenti Subject: Re: [xslt] Exslt support To: xslt@gnome.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: xslt-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: xslt-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: xslt@gnome.org X-Loop: xslt@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: xslt@gnome.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: The Gnome XSLT library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Daniel, Any suggestion/restriction on what regular expression package to use in order to implement the regex module of exslt? GNU regex is under the GPL but inside libc you can find it under the LGPL, which I assume would be fine.... Also, it seems that you developed your own regex package in order to support schemas, how does it compare to GNU regex? Thanks for you insight. Jerome __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more http://tax.yahoo.com From veillard@redhat.com Fri Apr 4 09:28:05 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: xslt@gnome.org Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com [66.187.233.200]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41A151812E for ; Fri, 4 Apr 2003 09:28:05 -0500 (EST) Received: (from veillard@localhost) by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.0) id h34ES4j05900 for xslt@gnome.org; Fri, 4 Apr 2003 09:28:04 -0500 Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 09:28:04 -0500 From: Daniel Veillard To: xslt@gnome.org Subject: Re: [xslt] Exslt support Message-ID: <20030404092804.L31240@redhat.com> References: <20030404140226.41974.qmail@web12306.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20030404140226.41974.qmail@web12306.mail.yahoo.com>; from jpesenti@yahoo.com on Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 06:02:26AM -0800 Sender: xslt-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: xslt-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: xslt@gnome.org X-Loop: xslt@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: xslt@gnome.org X-Reply-To: veillard@redhat.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: The Gnome XSLT library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 06:02:26AM -0800, Jerome Pesenti wrote: > Daniel, > Any suggestion/restriction on what regular expression > package to use in order to implement the regex module > of exslt? GNU regex is under the GPL but inside libc > you can find it under the LGPL, which I assume would > be fine.... Also, it seems that you developed your own > regex package in order to support schemas, how does it > compare to GNU regex? that it's part of libxml2 so the regexp to use. Its definition is at file:///u/veillard/Schemas/xmlschema-2.html#regexs I hope this match with EXSLT, if not feedback should be given to EXSLT so that they use XML releated regexps. I will not embed GNU regex, I do not want to depend on external libraries, especially when Licences are different from libxml2/libxslt ones. Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/ veillard@redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ From veillard@redhat.com Fri Apr 4 10:00:39 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: xslt@gnome.org Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com [66.187.233.200]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A07F8180EE for ; Fri, 4 Apr 2003 10:00:39 -0500 (EST) Received: (from veillard@localhost) by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.0) id h34F0aj13548 for xslt@gnome.org; Fri, 4 Apr 2003 10:00:36 -0500 Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 10:00:36 -0500 From: Daniel Veillard To: xslt@gnome.org Subject: Re: [xslt] Exslt support Message-ID: <20030404100036.M31240@redhat.com> References: <20030404140226.41974.qmail@web12306.mail.yahoo.com> <20030404092804.L31240@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20030404092804.L31240@redhat.com>; from veillard@redhat.com on Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 09:28:04AM -0500 Sender: xslt-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: xslt-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: xslt@gnome.org X-Loop: xslt@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: xslt@gnome.org X-Reply-To: veillard@redhat.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: The Gnome XSLT library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 09:28:04AM -0500, Daniel Veillard wrote: > On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 06:02:26AM -0800, Jerome Pesenti wrote: > > Daniel, > > Any suggestion/restriction on what regular expression > > package to use in order to implement the regex module > > of exslt? GNU regex is under the GPL but inside libc > > you can find it under the LGPL, which I assume would > > be fine.... Also, it seems that you developed your own > > regex package in order to support schemas, how does it > > compare to GNU regex? > > that it's part of libxml2 so the regexp to use. Its > definition is at file:///u/veillard/Schemas/xmlschema-2.html#regexs oops http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#regexs > I hope this match with EXSLT, if not feedback should be given to EXSLT > so that they use XML releated regexps. > I will not embed GNU regex, I do not want to depend on external > libraries, especially when Licences are different from libxml2/libxslt > ones. Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/ veillard@redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ From sbwoodside@yahoo.com Fri Apr 4 22:22:13 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: xslt@gnome.org Received: from tomts15-srv.bellnexxia.net (tomts15-srv.bellnexxia.net [209.226.175.3]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7CD6180DD for ; Fri, 4 Apr 2003 22:22:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from yahoo.com ([65.93.190.206]) by tomts15-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.04.19 201-253-122-122-119-20020516) with ESMTP id <20030405032212.MZLO21409.tomts15-srv.bellnexxia.net@yahoo.com>; Fri, 4 Apr 2003 22:22:12 -0500 Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 22:22:11 -0500 Subject: Re: [xslt] Re: more on the xslt namespace pipeline issue Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v551) From: S Woodside To: axkit-users@axkit.org, xslt@gnome.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <3E8E1498.70603@befunk.com> Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.551) Sender: xslt-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: xslt-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: xslt@gnome.org X-Loop: xslt@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: xslt@gnome.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: The Gnome XSLT library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: I have now updated to 1.0.29 of libxslt and the testcase I posted earlier is working now. Daniel, sorry about wasting your time. Robin Berjon wrote: > When passing a DOM around, what I believe is the correct namespace > information will be passed around. However when you save to an > intermediate file you get this: > > > > RNG Form > > Now I am very confused about this difference between the DOM and the serialized output. I have never used DOM. Now I am running: Using libxml 20506, libxslt 10029 and libexslt 719 % xsltproc a_instance.xml RNG Form > As we can see, thanks to namespace defaulting, we now have: > > {}btest > {http://simonwoodside.com/rng}rngform > {http://simonwoodside.com/rng}}title After reading http://www.jclark.com/xml/xmlns.htm it seems to me that this is correct! Is there some difference between the inheritance of an unprefixed name in input from a file as opposed to in output of a DOM? > Which is an entirely different document. Properly serialising that > would have required libxml to add xmlns='' on title, except that's > only possible starting with namespaces 1.1. Another option would have > been to add a random prefix to rngform, but that wouldn't be nice. I can see now that adding the xmlns='' on title in the trace file gives the same behaviour as AxKit uses internally, but 1) It is still different than the latest xsltproc's output 2) It seems to me that according to the rules of XSLT it is incorrect (after re-reading the entire XSLT FAQ section on namespaces, I do not see how this can be correct). > Unless I am solidly mistaken on how XSLT should treat namespace > contexts in xsl:element, the bug is yours and the AxKit processing > pipeline expresses the most logical output. It seems clear to me that on reading input files, the elements should inherit an unprefixed namespace in XSLT ... and this is how AxKit behaves in the first stage of the pipeline. Why should the rules change in the intermediate stages? I am looking at this from a black-box perspective, it seems to me that the results of the pipeline should be exactly the same as the results of manually pipelining it, using xsltproc. My head hurts from this stuff. Simon From veillard@redhat.com Sat Apr 5 01:55:02 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: xslt@gnome.org Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com [66.187.233.200]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A438D18184 for ; Sat, 5 Apr 2003 01:55:02 -0500 (EST) Received: (from veillard@localhost) by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.0) id h356t2h18109; Sat, 5 Apr 2003 01:55:02 -0500 Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2003 01:55:02 -0500 From: Daniel Veillard To: xslt@gnome.org Cc: axkit-users@axkit.org Subject: Re: [xslt] Re: more on the xslt namespace pipeline issue Message-ID: <20030405015502.R31240@redhat.com> References: <3E8E1498.70603@befunk.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from sbwoodside@yahoo.com on Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 10:22:11PM -0500 Sender: xslt-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: xslt-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: xslt@gnome.org X-Loop: xslt@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: xslt@gnome.org X-Reply-To: veillard@redhat.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: The Gnome XSLT library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 10:22:11PM -0500, S Woodside wrote: > I have now updated to 1.0.29 of libxslt and the testcase I posted > earlier is working now. Daniel, sorry about wasting your time. okay, good to know it was actually fixed :-) Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/ veillard@redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ From junkaddr@hotmail.com Sat Apr 5 23:41:13 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: xslt@gnome.org Received: from hotmail.com (f123.law11.hotmail.com [64.4.17.123]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9785D180F2 for ; Sat, 5 Apr 2003 23:41:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sat, 5 Apr 2003 20:41:11 -0800 Received: from 205.221.183.76 by lw11fd.law11.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sun, 06 Apr 2003 04:41:11 GMT X-Originating-IP: [205.221.183.76] X-Originating-Email: [junkaddr@hotmail.com] From: "Brett Kail" To: xslt@gnome.org Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2003 22:41:11 -0600 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Apr 2003 04:41:11.0481 (UTC) FILETIME=[BF993290:01C2FBF6] Subject: [xslt] func:result not recognized Sender: xslt-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: xslt-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: xslt@gnome.org X-Loop: xslt@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: xslt@gnome.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: The Gnome XSLT library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Hello, I'm attempting to use , but it seems that is not being recognized. Given the following...

...xsltproc says: ELEMENT fake PBM: Node has no parent ELEMENT func:result namespace func href=http://exslt.org/functions namespace my href=my ATTRIBUTE select TEXT content=1 ELEMENT more namespace my href=my namespace func href=http://exslt.org/functions {my}func: cannot write to result tree while executing a function xmlXPathCompiledEval: evaluation failed runtime error: file test.xslt line 14 element value-of xsltValueOf: text copy failed It seems that is not being recognized, but I do not know why. xsltproc --dumpextensions says: [...] Registered Extension Elements: {http://exslt.org/common}document {http://exslt.org/functions}result {http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/}test ...so it appears that the extensions are being registered. Does anyone know why this might be failing? Thanks, -Brett _________________________________________________________________ The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail From gregor@focusresearch.com Sun Apr 6 08:22:18 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: xslt@gnome.org Received: from domino1.kennedytech.com (unknown [63.69.80.18]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80C36181E6 for ; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 08:22:17 -0400 (EDT) To: xslt@gnome.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.10 March 22, 2002 From: gregor@focusresearch.com Message-ID: Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2003 08:18:08 -0400 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on Domino1/KTC(Release 5.0.10 |March 22, 2002) at 04/06/2003 08:18:09 AM Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_mixed 0043F02285256D00_=" Subject: [xslt] Possible namespace-related bug in xsltproc Sender: xslt-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: xslt-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: xslt@gnome.org X-Loop: xslt@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: xslt@gnome.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: The Gnome XSLT library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: --=_mixed 0043F02285256D00_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" [[ Moderator -- I posted this last night but it got queued. I've joined the list, so I'm reposting myself rather than waiting for it to go through your queue. I hope that is OK. ]] I've been tinkering with using xsltproc to apply XSL templates to modify SVG images produced by Sodipodi. I've been battling with behavior that I thought was due to mistakes made by me. Since that didn't lead to resolution, I entertained the possibility that xsltproc could have a problem. I've found that for an SVG document with a default namespace declaration in the root

------_=_NextPart_000_01C2FEBA.63B56680 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="sets.diff" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="sets.diff" Index: libexslt/sets.c =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/gnome/libxslt/libexslt/sets.c,v retrieving revision 1.10 diff -c -r1.10 sets.c *** libexslt/sets.c 18 Mar 2002 19:53:54 -0000 1.10 --- libexslt/sets.c 9 Apr 2003 17:05:56 -0000 *************** *** 113,119 **** /* !!! must be sorted !!! */ ret = xmlXPathDistinctSorted(ns); ! xmlXPathFreeNodeSet(ns); xmlXPathReturnNodeSet(ctxt, ret); } --- 113,120 ---- /* !!! must be sorted !!! */ ret = xmlXPathDistinctSorted(ns); ! if (ret != ns) ! xmlXPathFreeNodeSet(ns); xmlXPathReturnNodeSet(ctxt, ret); } ------_=_NextPart_000_01C2FEBA.63B56680-- From gena01@lk.net Wed Apr 9 13:37:19 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: xslt@gnome.org Received: from capital.lk.net (capital.lk.net [207.87.225.1]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D8F5181C9 for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 13:37:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by capital.lk.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h39HbJ420188; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 13:37:19 -0400 Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 13:37:19 -0400 Message-Id: <200304091737.h39HbJ420188@capital.lk.net> X-Authentication-Warning: capital.lk.net: nobody set sender to gena01@lk.net using -f From: "Gennady Feldman" To: xslt@gnome.org Subject: Re: [xslt] Segmentation fault w/ latest libxslt. X-Mailer: NeoMail 1.23 X-IPAddress: 198.140.63.114 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Sender: xslt-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: xslt-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: xslt@gnome.org X-Loop: xslt@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: xslt@gnome.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: The Gnome XSLT library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: [clipped] > > Fixed in CVS, see http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110023 > > Daniel > [clipped] Confirmed as it is fixed in CVS. I have rebuilt the rpm with latest CVS snapshot and have it running on my development machine. G.F. aka Gena01 http://www.gena01.com From veillard@redhat.com Wed Apr 9 16:03:52 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: xslt@gnome.org Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com [66.187.233.200]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A240181AB for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 16:03:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from veillard@localhost) by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.0) id h39K3lQ11470 for xslt@gnome.org; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 16:03:47 -0400 Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 16:03:47 -0400 From: Daniel Veillard To: xslt@gnome.org Subject: Re: [xslt] Result Tree Fragments Message-ID: <20030409160347.E22996@redhat.com> References: <09B3671D58690A4193A7F8F15F416B23111B29@denmails3.jdedwards.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <09B3671D58690A4193A7F8F15F416B23111B29@denmails3.jdedwards.com>; from Mark_Vakoc@jdedwards.com on Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 10:20:42AM -0600 Sender: xslt-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: xslt-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: xslt@gnome.org X-Loop: xslt@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: xslt@gnome.org X-Reply-To: veillard@redhat.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: The Gnome XSLT library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 10:20:42AM -0600, Vakoc, Mark wrote: > Well I haven't heard anything but this fixes my own testcase in bug 110023 > so I think it's safe to apply. yep, sorry didn't had time yet to look in details. > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Vakoc, Mark > > Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2003 2:28 PM > > To: 'xslt@gnome.org' > > Subject: RE: [xslt] Result Tree Fragments > > > > > > Perhaps an answer to my own question: > > > > Daniel, can you verify that the attached patch for > > str:tokenize() is the > > correct method for returning Result Tree Fragments from > > extension functions. Hum, right, creating a real document node is what libxslt does now for RTFs, it's more unified, simplifies the template processing for those, etc ... context->document becoming NULL is an annoyance but really a side effect of the node-set() extension which wasn't in the initial spec and which I didn't design for. It's annoying to change some design at this point but it's really due to the huge deployment of this extension function. > > This also fixes what appeared to be a memory leak in that 'str' and > > 'delimiters' were never freed if the operation was successful. > > > > I've also attached the patch to the bug. I applied the patch, thanks ! Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/ veillard@redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ From veillard@redhat.com Wed Apr 9 16:15:08 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: xslt@gnome.org Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com [66.187.233.200]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F12D218880 for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 16:15:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from veillard@localhost) by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.0) id h39KF7W16132 for xslt@gnome.org; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 16:15:07 -0400 Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 16:15:07 -0400 From: Daniel Veillard To: xslt@gnome.org Subject: Re: [xslt] fix for set:distinct() Message-ID: <20030409161507.F22996@redhat.com> References: <09B3671D58690A4193A7F8F15F416B23FF255B@denmails3.jdedwards.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <09B3671D58690A4193A7F8F15F416B23FF255B@denmails3.jdedwards.com>; from Mark_Vakoc@jdedwards.com on Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 11:06:40AM -0600 Sender: xslt-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: xslt-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: xslt@gnome.org X-Loop: xslt@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: xslt@gnome.org X-Reply-To: veillard@redhat.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: The Gnome XSLT library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 11:06:40AM -0600, Vakoc, Mark wrote: > Possible double free error fixed. Attached is a patch and a testcase. Right, but there is still a memory leak ... apparently an RTF containing just

is not freed, I need to investigate paphio:~/XSLT/tests/general -> xsltproc ./bug-116.xsl ./../docs/bug-116.xml paphio:~/XSLT/tests/general -> cat .memdump 10:12:05 PM MEMORY ALLOCATED : 157, MAX was 27171 BLOCK NUMBER SIZE TYPE 0 632 2 malloc() in none(0) "p" 1 631 52 malloc() in none(0) pointer to #632 at index 8 2 630 19 malloc() in none(0) " fake node libxslt" 3 629 4 malloc() in none(0) "1.0" 4 628 80 malloc() in none(0) pointer to #630 at index 8 paphio:~/XSLT/tests/general -> Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/ veillard@redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ From srperan@sherlock.dif.um.es Thu Apr 10 05:39:08 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: xslt@gnome.org Received: from unimur.um.es (unknown [155.54.1.1]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE2A418888 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 05:39:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sherlock (sherlock.dif.um.es [155.54.15.166]) by unimur.um.es (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA06142; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 11:39:01 +0200 (MEST) From: srperan@sherlock.dif.um.es Received: from srperan by sherlock with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 193YbQ-0005yl-00; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 11:44:16 +0200 Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 11:44:16 +0200 To: xslt@gnome.org Cc: dsevilla@ditec.um.es Message-ID: <20030410094416.GB22874@sherlock.dif.um.es> References: <20030410083807.14118.27712.Mailman@moniker.gnome.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030410083807.14118.27712.Mailman@moniker.gnome.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Subject: [xslt] Question about white space output Sender: xslt-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: xslt-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: xslt@gnome.org X-Loop: xslt@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: xslt@gnome.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: The Gnome XSLT library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Hello. I am using libxslt to process a XML file and output a plain text file and I need to insert white spaces. I have tried with but this returns a symbol, not whitespace. I have read that this is an encoding problem but I can tell to libxslt that the output must be ISO-8859-1. I have tried with #x20, #x9, #xD and #xA without results. Thanks Jose Luis Peran From veillard@redhat.com Thu Apr 10 06:17:50 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: xslt@gnome.org Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com [66.187.233.200]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61AC718325 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 06:17:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from veillard@localhost) by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.0) id h3AAHoK15065; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 06:17:50 -0400 Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 06:17:50 -0400 From: Daniel Veillard To: xslt@gnome.org, srperan@sherlock.dif.um.es Cc: dsevilla@ditec.um.es Subject: Re: [xslt] Question about white space output Message-ID: <20030410061749.C28785@redhat.com> References: <20030410083807.14118.27712.Mailman@moniker.gnome.org> <20030410094416.GB22874@sherlock.dif.um.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20030410094416.GB22874@sherlock.dif.um.es>; from srperan@sherlock.dif.um.es on Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 11:44:16AM +0200 Sender: xslt-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: xslt-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: xslt@gnome.org X-Loop: xslt@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: xslt@gnome.org X-Reply-To: veillard@redhat.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: The Gnome XSLT library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 11:44:16AM +0200, srperan@sherlock.dif.um.es wrote: > Hello. I am using libxslt to process a XML file and output a plain text > file and I need to insert white spaces. I have tried with > but this returns a symbol, not whitespace. What symbol ? This is probably equivalent to the > I have read that this is an encoding problem Where ? how ? by whom ? Pointer please ! If someone think there is a bug in libxslt, he better state it clearly and give a full example, you included ! Have you read http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/bugs.html ? If yes why didn't you follow the guidelines "send the command showing the error as well as the input and stylesheet" > but I can tell to libxslt that the > output must be ISO-8859-1. Your report is terribly unprecise. You "can" or you "did" ask for ISO-8859-1 ? You don't even tell what kind of output you asked for, xml ? html ? text ? I doubt it's a bug, on the other hand you sound very confused. And your report contains no way to check what you're trying to argue about, nor even to try to get an idea of what exactly is the problem. As a result we are both loosing time :-( . Follow the guidelines, they are there for good reasons ! Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/ veillard@redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ From srperan@sherlock.dif.um.es Thu Apr 10 07:29:29 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: xslt@gnome.org Received: from unimur.um.es (unknown [155.54.1.1]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B49A188E1 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 07:29:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sherlock (sherlock.dif.um.es [155.54.15.166]) by unimur.um.es (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA13090 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 13:29:27 +0200 (MEST) From: srperan@sherlock.dif.um.es Received: from srperan by sherlock with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 193aKJ-000640-00 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 13:34:43 +0200 Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 13:34:42 +0200 To: xslt@gnome.org Subject: Re: [xslt] Question about white space output Message-ID: <20030410113442.GA23217@sherlock.dif.um.es> References: <20030410083807.14118.27712.Mailman@moniker.gnome.org> <20030410094416.GB22874@sherlock.dif.um.es> <20030410061749.C28785@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030410061749.C28785@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Sender: xslt-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: xslt-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: xslt@gnome.org X-Loop: xslt@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: xslt@gnome.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: The Gnome XSLT library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Well, maybe I did not explain correctly. Excuse me, but my english is not very good. I have a XML file, and I use libxslt to process it. The output is a TEXT file. I want to insert white spaces into the output TEXT file. I am not talking about a libxslt bug. I am just asking how to do it. I have been reading past messages and I have seen similar questions, but I think those questions was not regarding a TEXT output. I will be more explicit. We have this XML piece : and using this template, we want to obtain a TEXT output: typedef sequence <, > ; sequence <, > sequence <, > When we process this, we obtain this output : typedef sequence < sequence < sequence < long >>>secuencia2; When we need : typedef sequence < sequence < sequence < long > > > secuencia2; Now, the question is, how can I insert the white spaces between symbols? symbols? Thank You. Jose Luis Peran Daniel Veillard wrote: > On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 11:44:16AM +0200, srperan@sherlock.dif.um.es wrote: > > Hello. I am using libxslt to process a XML file and output a plain text > > file and I need to insert white spaces. I have tried with > > but this returns a symbol, not whitespace. > > What symbol ? This is probably equivalent to the > > > I have read that this is an encoding problem > > Where ? how ? by whom ? Pointer please ! If someone think there is a bug > in libxslt, he better state it clearly and give a full example, you > included ! Have you read http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/bugs.html ? If yes > why didn't you follow the guidelines > "send the command showing the error as well as the input and stylesheet" > > > but I can tell to libxslt that the > > output must be ISO-8859-1. > > Your report is terribly unprecise. You "can" or you "did" ask for > ISO-8859-1 ? > You don't even tell what kind of output you asked for, xml ? html ? text ? > I doubt it's a bug, on the other hand you sound very confused. And your > report contains no way to check what you're trying to argue about, nor > even to try to get an idea of what exactly is the problem. As a result > we are both loosing time :-( . Follow the guidelines, they are there for > good reasons ! > > Daniel > > -- > Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/ > veillard@redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ > http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ > _______________________________________________ > xslt mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/ > xslt@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xslt From rm@mh-freiburg.de Thu Apr 10 07:42:28 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: xslt@gnome.org Received: from forte.mh-freiburg.de (mail.mh-freiburg.de [193.197.131.2]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A45171858A for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 07:42:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from forte (forte [127.0.0.1]) by forte.mh-freiburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E925E1B334A for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 13:42:26 +0200 (MEST) Received: from forte.mh-freiburg.de (forte [127.0.0.1]) by forte (AvMailGate-2.0.1.10) id 04456-0AEF6985; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 13:41:49 +0200 Received: by forte.mh-freiburg.de (Postfix, from userid 104) id BD0991B334A; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 13:41:49 +0200 (MEST) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 13:41:49 +0200 To: xslt@gnome.org Subject: Re: [xslt] Question about white space output Message-ID: <20030410134149.A29152@forte.mh-freiburg.de> References: <20030410083807.14118.27712.Mailman@moniker.gnome.org> <20030410094416.GB22874@sherlock.dif.um.es> <20030410061749.C28785@redhat.com> <20030410113442.GA23217@sherlock.dif.um.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.17i In-Reply-To: <20030410113442.GA23217@sherlock.dif.um.es>; from srperan@sherlock.dif.um.es on Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 01:34:42PM +0200 From: rm@mh-freiburg.de (Le grande pinguin) X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir MailGate (version: 2.0.1.10; AVE: 6.19.0.3; VDF: 6.19.0.6; host: forte) Sender: xslt-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: xslt-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: xslt@gnome.org X-Loop: xslt@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: xslt@gnome.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: The Gnome XSLT library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 01:34:42PM +0200, srperan@sherlock.dif.um.es wrote: > Well, maybe I did not explain correctly. Excuse me, but my english is > not very good. No need to apologize, o lot of us aren't native speakers. But (IMHU) Daniel's main point was: be precise in what you provide as context information. Best: provide a small (but complete!, see below) sample case that demonstrates the problem (input, stylefile, output, expected output). Also, since this is _not_ a "general tipps and help for XSLT" mailing list: have you tested your data with other XSLT processors and do they give different output? If not there's a good chance that your XSLT is incorrect. > I have a XML file, and I use libxslt to process it. The output is a TEXT > file. > I want to insert white spaces into the output TEXT file. > I am not talking about a libxslt bug. I am just asking how to do it. > > I have been reading past messages and I have seen similar questions, but > I think those questions was not regarding a TEXT output. > I will be more explicit. We have this XML piece : > > > > > > > > > > > and using this template, we want to obtain a TEXT output: This is _not_ enough! There's the stylesheet tag missing. Even more important: what's the value of the 'method' attribute of the 'xsl:output' tag (you _did_ use a 'method' attribute, or?). > > > typedef sequence < select="sequence"/>, select="@max"/> > select="@name"/>; > sequence < select="@type"/>, select="@max"/> > > sequence < select="sequence"/>, > > > > > > > > When we process this, we obtain this output : > > typedef sequence < sequence < sequence < long >>>secuencia2; > > When we need : > > typedef sequence < sequence < sequence < long > > > secuencia2; > > Now, the question is, how can I insert the white spaces between symbols? > symbols? Hmm, hmmm: > There's whitespace at the beginning and end of the text node .... Depending on your output method that's dangerous. How about: > hth Ralf Mattes > > Thank You. > > Jose Luis Peran > > > > > > Daniel Veillard wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 11:44:16AM +0200, srperan@sherlock.dif.um.es wrote: > > > Hello. I am using libxslt to process a XML file and output a plain text > > > file and I need to insert white spaces. I have tried with > > > but this returns a symbol, not whitespace. > > > > What symbol ? This is probably equivalent to the > > > > > I have read that this is an encoding problem > > > > Where ? how ? by whom ? Pointer please ! If someone think there is a bug > > in libxslt, he better state it clearly and give a full example, you > > included ! Have you read http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/bugs.html ? If yes > > why didn't you follow the guidelines > > "send the command showing the error as well as the input and stylesheet" > > > > > but I can tell to libxslt that the > > > output must be ISO-8859-1. > > > > Your report is terribly unprecise. You "can" or you "did" ask for > > ISO-8859-1 ? > > You don't even tell what kind of output you asked for, xml ? html ? text ? > > I doubt it's a bug, on the other hand you sound very confused. And your > > report contains no way to check what you're trying to argue about, nor > > even to try to get an idea of what exactly is the problem. As a result > > we are both loosing time :-( . Follow the guidelines, they are there for > > good reasons ! > > > > Daniel > > > > -- > > Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/ > > veillard@redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ > > http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ > > _______________________________________________ > > xslt mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/ > > xslt@gnome.org > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xslt > _______________________________________________ > xslt mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/ > xslt@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xslt From srperan@sherlock.dif.um.es Thu Apr 10 07:57:52 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: xslt@gnome.org Received: from unimur.um.es (unimur.um.es [155.54.1.1]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD88C1817C for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 07:57:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sherlock (sherlock.dif.um.es [155.54.15.166]) by unimur.um.es (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA14640 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 13:57:42 +0200 (MEST) From: srperan@sherlock.dif.um.es Received: from srperan by sherlock with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 193ale-000654-00 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 14:02:58 +0200 Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 14:02:58 +0200 To: xslt@gnome.org Subject: Re: [xslt] Question about white space output Message-ID: <20030410120258.GA23360@sherlock.dif.um.es> References: <20030410083807.14118.27712.Mailman@moniker.gnome.org> <20030410094416.GB22874@sherlock.dif.um.es> <20030410061749.C28785@redhat.com> <20030410113442.GA23217@sherlock.dif.um.es> <20030410134149.A29152@forte.mh-freiburg.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030410134149.A29152@forte.mh-freiburg.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Sender: xslt-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: xslt-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: xslt@gnome.org X-Loop: xslt@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: xslt@gnome.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: The Gnome XSLT library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 01:41:49PM +0200, Le grande pinguin wrote: > On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 01:34:42PM +0200, srperan@sherlock.dif.um.es wrote: > > Well, maybe I did not explain correctly. Excuse me, but my english is > > not very good. > > No need to apologize, o lot of us aren't native speakers. > But (IMHU) Daniel's main point was: be precise in what you provide > as context information. Best: provide a small (but complete!, see below) > sample case that demonstrates the problem (input, stylefile, output, > expected output). Also, since this is _not_ a "general tipps and > help for XSLT" mailing list: have you tested your data with other > XSLT processors and do they give different output? If not there's a good > chance that your XSLT is incorrect. > I know this list is not a help list, but I am two days with this and I need to solve this, so I though I can ask here. I have tried with xalan, but I obtain a parse error (This error is strange because I obtain the error in a line without errors, I have seen that). My xsl and xml filer are correct, I am sure. > > I have a XML file, and I use libxslt to process it. The output is a TEXT > > file. > > I want to insert white spaces into the output TEXT file. > > I am not talking about a libxslt bug. I am just asking how to do it. > > > > I have been reading past messages and I have seen similar questions, but > > I think those questions was not regarding a TEXT output. > > I will be more explicit. We have this XML piece : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and using this template, we want to obtain a TEXT output: > > This is _not_ enough! There's the stylesheet tag missing. Even more > important: what's the value of the 'method' attribute of the > 'xsl:output' tag (you _did_ use a 'method' attribute, or?). > Here is the header of the XSL file : > > > > > > typedef sequence < > select="sequence"/>, > select="@max"/> > > select="@name"/>; > > sequence < > select="@type"/>, > select="@max"/> > > > sequence < > select="sequence"/>, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > When we process this, we obtain this output : > > > > typedef sequence < sequence < sequence < long >>>secuencia2; > > > > When we need : > > > > typedef sequence < sequence < sequence < long > > > secuencia2; > > > > Now, the question is, how can I insert the white spaces between symbols? > > symbols? > > > Hmm, hmmm: > > > > There's whitespace at the beginning and end of the text node .... > Depending on your output method that's dangerous. How about: > > > > > It doesnt work :( > hth Ralf Mattes > > > > Thank You. > > > > Jose Luis Peran > > > > > > > > > > > > Daniel Veillard wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 11:44:16AM +0200, srperan@sherlock.dif.um.es wrote: > > > > Hello. I am using libxslt to process a XML file and output a plain text > > > > file and I need to insert white spaces. I have tried with > > > > but this returns a symbol, not whitespace. > > > > > > What symbol ? This is probably equivalent to the > > > > > > > I have read that this is an encoding problem > > > > > > Where ? how ? by whom ? Pointer please ! If someone think there is a bug > > > in libxslt, he better state it clearly and give a full example, you > > > included ! Have you read http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/bugs.html ? If yes > > > why didn't you follow the guidelines > > > "send the command showing the error as well as the input and stylesheet" > > > > > > > but I can tell to libxslt that the > > > > output must be ISO-8859-1. > > > > > > Your report is terribly unprecise. You "can" or you "did" ask for > > > ISO-8859-1 ? > > > You don't even tell what kind of output you asked for, xml ? html ? text ? > > > I doubt it's a bug, on the other hand you sound very confused. And your > > > report contains no way to check what you're trying to argue about, nor > > > even to try to get an idea of what exactly is the problem. As a result > > > we are both loosing time :-( . Follow the guidelines, they are there for > > > good reasons ! > > > > > > Daniel > > > > > > -- > > > Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/ > > > veillard@redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ > > > http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ > > > _______________________________________________ > > > xslt mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/ > > > xslt@gnome.org > > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xslt > > _______________________________________________ > > xslt mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/ > > xslt@gnome.org > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xslt > _______________________________________________ > xslt mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/ > xslt@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xslt From veillard@redhat.com Thu Apr 10 08:03:25 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: xslt@gnome.org Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com [66.187.233.200]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A4921817C for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 08:03:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from veillard@localhost) by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.0) id h3AC3OL03955 for xslt@gnome.org; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 08:03:24 -0400 Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 08:03:24 -0400 From: Daniel Veillard To: xslt@gnome.org Subject: Re: [xslt] Question about white space output Message-ID: <20030410080324.D28785@redhat.com> References: <20030410083807.14118.27712.Mailman@moniker.gnome.org> <20030410094416.GB22874@sherlock.dif.um.es> <20030410061749.C28785@redhat.com> <20030410113442.GA23217@sherlock.dif.um.es> <20030410134149.A29152@forte.mh-freiburg.de> <20030410120258.GA23360@sherlock.dif.um.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20030410120258.GA23360@sherlock.dif.um.es>; from srperan@sherlock.dif.um.es on Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 02:02:58PM +0200 Sender: xslt-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: xslt-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: xslt@gnome.org X-Loop: xslt@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: xslt@gnome.org X-Reply-To: veillard@redhat.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: The Gnome XSLT library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 02:02:58PM +0200, srperan@sherlock.dif.um.es wrote: > > This is _not_ enough! There's the stylesheet tag missing. Even more > > important: what's the value of the 'method' attribute of the > > 'xsl:output' tag (you _did_ use a 'method' attribute, or?). > > > > Here is the header of the XSL file : > > xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform" > > > > provide the input and stayle sheets in full forms as attachement if you want me to look at this. I wrote it in the page, I asked it by mail. If you don't want to spend the time to follow the instruction why should I spend the time to look at your problem ? This is really irritating :-( Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/ veillard@redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ From morus@tanto-xipolis.de Thu Apr 10 08:07:51 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: xslt@gnome.org Received: from mail.tanto-xipolis.de (mail.xipolis.net [213.61.178.42]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEB341884D for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 08:07:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from morus.xipolis.net (unknown [10.0.1.4]) by mail.tanto-xipolis.de (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.3 (i386)) with ESMTP id 9EBC919B718; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 14:07:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from morus@localhost) by morus.xipolis.net (8.11.6/8.11.6/SuSE Linux 0.5) id h3AC83418897; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 14:08:03 +0200 From: Morus Walter MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <16021.24227.629044.347232@morus.xipolis.net> Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 14:08:03 +0200 To: xslt@gnome.org Cc: srperan@sherlock.dif.um.es Subject: Re: [xslt] Question about white space output In-Reply-To: <20030410113442.GA23217@sherlock.dif.um.es> References: <20030410083807.14118.27712.Mailman@moniker.gnome.org> <20030410094416.GB22874@sherlock.dif.um.es> <20030410061749.C28785@redhat.com> <20030410113442.GA23217@sherlock.dif.um.es> X-Mailer: VM 6.95 under 21.4 (patch 4) "Artificial Intelligence" XEmacs Lucid Sender: xslt-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: xslt-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: xslt@gnome.org X-Loop: xslt@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: xslt@gnome.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: The Gnome XSLT library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: srperan@sherlock.dif.um.es writes: > When we process this, we obtain this output : >=20 > typedef sequence < sequence < sequence < long >>>secuencia2; >=20 > When we need : >=20 > typedef sequence < sequence < sequence < long > > > secuencia2; >=20 > Now, the question is, how can I insert the white spaces between symbo= ls? > symbols? >=20 Well, this is basically a xslt question and is more suited to a general= xslt mailing list than to this list, which is specifically on libxslt. Unfortunately you left out relevant information again (what output-enco= ding does your stylesheet provide? How do you process?) Using copy & paste from your mail and adding what's needed I get =09typedef sequence <, > ; =09=09sequence <, > =09=09=09sequence <, =09=09=09> =09=09=09 =09=09=09 and xsltproc (2.5.4) gives typedef sequence > > secuencia2; which isn't what you want, but isn't what you get either. I guess your stylesheet got modified during mail. If I use=20 =20 =09typedef sequence < , > ; =09=09sequence < , > =09=09=09sequence < , =09=09=09 > = =09=09=09 I get typedef sequence < sequence < sequence < long > > > secuencia2; which seems to be what you want (unless you have a problem with two blanks). If you didn't specify ISO-8859-1 output encoding it's no surpise that you found something like '=C2 ' for nbsp since the default encoding is utf8 and that's nbsp's utf8 represantation. So it's just adding the WS to the text in the stylesheet apropiatly. (And perhaps knowing that pure whitespace between elements should be put into ...; otherwise it's removed). HTH =09Morus From srperan@sherlock.dif.um.es Thu Apr 10 11:54:03 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: xslt@gnome.org Received: from unimur.um.es (unknown [155.54.1.1]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFBD61826D for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 11:54:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sherlock (sherlock.dif.um.es [155.54.15.166]) by unimur.um.es (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA26835 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 17:54:01 +0200 (MEST) From: srperan@sherlock.dif.um.es Received: from srperan by sherlock with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 193eSN-0006My-00 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 17:59:19 +0200 Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 17:59:19 +0200 To: xslt@gnome.org Subject: Re: [xslt] Question about white space output Message-ID: <20030410155919.GA24152@sherlock.dif.um.es> References: <20030410083807.14118.27712.Mailman@moniker.gnome.org> <20030410094416.GB22874@sherlock.dif.um.es> <20030410061749.C28785@redhat.com> <20030410113442.GA23217@sherlock.dif.um.es> <16021.24227.629044.347232@morus.xipolis.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <16021.24227.629044.347232@morus.xipolis.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Sender: xslt-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: xslt-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: xslt@gnome.org X-Loop: xslt@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: xslt@gnome.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: The Gnome XSLT library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 02:08:03PM +0200, Morus Walter wrote: > > If I use > > > > > > > > typedef sequence < select="sequence"/>, select="@max"/> > select="@name"/>; > sequence < select="@type"/>, select="@max"/> > > sequence < select="sequence"/>, > > > > > > > I get > typedef sequence < sequence < sequence < long > > > secuencia2; > which seems to be what you want (unless you have a problem with two > blanks). Yes, that is the output I obtain with xsltproc, but when I use my program, it returns an incorrect output. Maybe I have some mistake in my parsing code, but I dont see it. My code just check xml file with a dtd, parse file and process the file with libxslt. I dont see where can be the problem. Can you help me, please? Thanks Jose Luis Peran > > If you didn't specify ISO-8859-1 output encoding it's no surpise that > you found something like '? ' for nbsp since the default encoding is > utf8 and that's nbsp's utf8 represantation. > I specify ISO-8859-1 encoding, so this is not the problem > So it's just adding the WS to the text in the stylesheet apropiatly. > (And perhaps knowing that pure whitespace between elements should be > put into ...; otherwise it's removed). > I have added ... and it doesnt correct the problem. > HTH > Morus > _______________________________________________ From rm@mh-freiburg.de Thu Apr 10 12:02:56 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: xslt@gnome.org Received: from forte.mh-freiburg.de (mail.mh-freiburg.de [193.197.131.2]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 002F31835C for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 12:02:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from forte (forte [127.0.0.1]) by forte.mh-freiburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 758051B3347 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 18:02:55 +0200 (MEST) Received: from forte.mh-freiburg.de (forte [127.0.0.1]) by forte (AvMailGate-2.0.1.10) id 08344-6D1A0CE2; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 18:02:10 +0200 Received: by forte.mh-freiburg.de (Postfix, from userid 104) id A8A971B3347; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 18:02:10 +0200 (MEST) Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 18:02:10 +0200 To: xslt@gnome.org Subject: Re: [xslt] Question about white space output Message-ID: <20030410180210.A9654@forte.mh-freiburg.de> References: <20030410083807.14118.27712.Mailman@moniker.gnome.org> <20030410094416.GB22874@sherlock.dif.um.es> <20030410061749.C28785@redhat.com> <20030410113442.GA23217@sherlock.dif.um.es> <16021.24227.629044.347232@morus.xipolis.net> <20030410155919.GA24152@sherlock.dif.um.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.17i In-Reply-To: <20030410155919.GA24152@sherlock.dif.um.es>; from srperan@sherlock.dif.um.es on Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 05:59:19PM +0200 From: rm@mh-freiburg.de (Le grande pinguin) X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir MailGate (version: 2.0.1.10; AVE: 6.19.0.3; VDF: 6.19.0.6; host: forte) Sender: xslt-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: xslt-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: xslt@gnome.org X-Loop: xslt@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: xslt@gnome.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: The Gnome XSLT library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 05:59:19PM +0200, srperan@sherlock.dif.um.es wrote: > > Yes, that is the output I obtain with xsltproc, but when I use my > program, it returns an incorrect output. Maybe I have some mistake in my > parsing code, but I dont see it. > > My code just check xml file with a dtd, parse file and process the file > with libxslt. I dont see where can be the problem. > Can you help me, please? Not without the neccessary information. This is the first time you tell us that there is a custom program involved. Where's the code? Can you reduce the code to a minimal example that exposes the problem? How actually do you serialize the document (i _assume_ we are talking about an xmlDocPtr here, or?). ralf mattes > Thanks > Jose Luis Peran > > > > > If you didn't specify ISO-8859-1 output encoding it's no surpise that > > you found something like '? ' for nbsp since the default encoding is > > utf8 and that's nbsp's utf8 represantation. > > > > I specify ISO-8859-1 encoding, so this is not the problem > > > So it's just adding the WS to the text in the stylesheet apropiatly. > > (And perhaps knowing that pure whitespace between elements should be > > put into ...; otherwise it's removed). > > > > I have added ... and it doesnt correct the problem. > > > HTH > > Morus > > _______________________________________________ > _______________________________________________ > xslt mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/ > xslt@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xslt From srperan@sherlock.dif.um.es Thu Apr 10 12:41:40 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: xslt@gnome.org Received: from unimur.um.es (unknown [155.54.1.1]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73F2518213 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 12:41:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sherlock (sherlock.dif.um.es [155.54.15.166]) by unimur.um.es (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA29884 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 18:41:35 +0200 (MEST) From: srperan@sherlock.dif.um.es Received: from srperan by sherlock with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 193fCP-0006Qe-00 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 18:46:53 +0200 Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 18:46:53 +0200 To: xslt@gnome.org Subject: Re: [xslt] Question about white space output Message-ID: <20030410164653.GA24674@sherlock.dif.um.es> References: <20030410083807.14118.27712.Mailman@moniker.gnome.org> <20030410094416.GB22874@sherlock.dif.um.es> <20030410061749.C28785@redhat.com> <20030410113442.GA23217@sherlock.dif.um.es> <16021.24227.629044.347232@morus.xipolis.net> <20030410155919.GA24152@sherlock.dif.um.es> <20030410180210.A9654@forte.mh-freiburg.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20030410180210.A9654@forte.mh-freiburg.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Sender: xslt-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: xslt-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: xslt@gnome.org X-Loop: xslt@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: xslt@gnome.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: The Gnome XSLT library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 06:02:10PM +0200, Le grande pinguin wrote: > On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 05:59:19PM +0200, srperan@sherlock.dif.um.es wrote: > > > > Yes, that is the output I obtain with xsltproc, but when I use my > > program, it returns an incorrect output. Maybe I have some mistake in my > > parsing code, but I dont see it. > > > > My code just check xml file with a dtd, parse file and process the file > > with libxslt. I dont see where can be the problem. > > Can you help me, please? > > Not without the neccessary information. This is the first time you > tell us that there is a custom program involved. Where's the code? > Can you reduce the code to a minimal example that exposes the problem? > How actually do you serialize the document (i _assume_ we are talking > about an xmlDocPtr here, or?). > > ralf mattes I really apologize, my brain is too hot today after too many hours thinking about it and I dont say you important info. Please, forgive me. This is the basic code for the parsing : int XSLTProcess::convert() { // process the input file and get the converted file through stdout xsltStylesheetPtr cur; xmlDocPtr doc, res; const char *params[16 + 1]; params[0] = NULL; //Read the stylesheet cur = xsltParseStylesheetFile(inputXSLFile); //Get the xmlDoctr doc = inputXMLTree.getXMLDoc(); // if (cur == NULL) // cout << "hola mundo\n\n"; //Apply stylesheet res = xsltApplyStylesheet(cur, doc, params); //and save the output file xsltSaveResultToFile(stdout, res, cur); } I think you see the basic source. It�s easy to understand. The main function, creates a XSLTProcess instance and calls to convert. When creating the XSLTProcess instance, it creares a XMLTree instance with the following constructor : XMLTree::XMLTree(char *xmlfile) throw ( XMLDocumentException ) { char *dtdfile = "./xmlfiles/dtdidl.dtd"; //Create a XMLTree object that contain a sintax tree of xmlfile doc = xmlParseFile(xmlfile); //Validate the xml file with the dtd file if ( !ValidateFileWithDTD ( dtdfile ) ) throw XMLDocumentException("The XML document isn't correct.\n"); if (doc == NULL) //if doc == NULL the document is not correct throw XMLDocumentException("I can't parse the XML document"); root = xmlDocGetRootElement(doc); }; The function ValidateFileWithDTD just do that. It�s simple, and I dont see the problem. Lots of thanks again, and again, forgive me > > Thanks > > Jose Luis Peran > > > > > > > > If you didn't specify ISO-8859-1 output encoding it's no surpise that > > > you found something like '? ' for nbsp since the default encoding is > > > utf8 and that's nbsp's utf8 represantation. > > > > > > > I specify ISO-8859-1 encoding, so this is not the problem > > > > > So it's just adding the WS to the text in the stylesheet apropiatly. > > > (And perhaps knowing that pure whitespace between elements should be > > > put into ...; otherwise it's removed). > > > > > > > I have added ... and it doesnt correct the problem. > > > > > HTH > > > Morus > > > _______________________________________________ > > _______________________________________________ > > xslt mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/ > > xslt@gnome.org > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xslt > _______________________________________________ > xslt mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/ > xslt@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xslt From igor@zlatkovic.com Thu Apr 10 12:42:17 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: xslt@gnome.org Received: from post.webmailer.de (natsmtp00.webmailer.de [192.67.198.74]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7837818376 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 12:42:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.zlatkovic.com (pD951B59D.dip.t-dialin.net [217.81.181.157]) by post.webmailer.de (8.12.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id h3AGgGbw000950 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 18:42:16 +0200 (MEST) Received: from 192.168.9.71 (ident=unknown) by mail.zlatkovic.com with esmtp (MasqMail 0.1.16) id 193f7v-7ok-00 for xslt@gnome.org; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 18:42:15 +0200 Message-ID: <3E959EE6.9050306@zlatkovic.com> Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 18:42:14 +0200 From: Igor Zlatkovic User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312 X-Accept-Language: en-gb, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: xslt@gnome.org Subject: Re: [xslt] Question about white space output References: <20030410083807.14118.27712.Mailman@moniker.gnome.org> <20030410094416.GB22874@sherlock.dif.um.es> <20030410061749.C28785@redhat.com> <20030410113442.GA23217@sherlock.dif.um.es> <16021.24227.629044.347232@morus.xipolis.net> <20030410155919.GA24152@sherlock.dif.um.es> In-Reply-To: <20030410155919.GA24152@sherlock.dif.um.es> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xslt-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: xslt-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: xslt@gnome.org X-Loop: xslt@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: xslt@gnome.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: The Gnome XSLT library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: srperan@sherlock.dif.um.es wrote: > Yes, that is the output I obtain with xsltproc, but when I use my > program, it returns an incorrect output. Maybe I have some mistake in my > parsing code, but I dont see it. > > My code just check xml file with a dtd, parse file and process the file > with libxslt. I dont see where can be the problem. > Can you help me, please? Okay, I think I have understood what you need. Why bother with the complicated oddities of various software packages? Why bang your head against the wall for problems that just won't solve themselves? Sit back, relax and let an expirienced professional ban the demon in an instant. An uncomplicated and fast consulting service will save you a lot of headaches and money. Just have your breakfast and read your favourite newspapers, a skilled consultant will solve your problems before your coffee gets cold! Please contact me with a formal inquiry and in a week, you'll hardly remember anything was ever wrong. :-) PS: I charge 120 EUR per hour plus applicable taxes and expenses. PPS: If my bayesian filter doesn't fire on this message, then I'll have to practice this for a while :-) From aduhon@firstam.com Thu Apr 10 14:32:12 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: xslt@gnome.org Received: from fada1smt02.firstam-reis.com (mail2.firstam-reis.com [206.103.66.183]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED1AB183C2 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 14:32:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from fada1sxc02.firstam-reis.com (fada1sxc02.firstam-reis.com [172.16.3.2]) by fada1smt02.FirstAm-REIS.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #40534) with ESMTP id <0HD5008D54OWE0@fada1smt02.FirstAm-REIS.com> for xslt@gnome.org; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 13:29:20 -0500 (CDT) Received: by fada1sxc02.firstam-reis.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <2NVWHT1L>; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 13:32:09 -0500 Content-return: allowed Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 13:32:07 -0500 From: "Duhon, Andrew" To: "'xslt@gnome.org'" Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_gkNQ0eApz37UtpNRHxepiw)" Subject: [xslt] xsltApplyOneTemplate Sender: xslt-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: xslt-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: xslt@gnome.org X-Loop: xslt@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: xslt@gnome.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: The Gnome XSLT library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. --Boundary_(ID_gkNQ0eApz37UtpNRHxepiw) Content-type: text/plain Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Hi, I am having a problem with applying a stylesheet. Most of the xml docs and stylesheets we are using are processed in a relatively short time, less than a second. However we have on the at is taking almost a minute. I have traced it down to the xsltApplOneTemplate being called over 39,000 times. What I am trying to figure out is if it is the complexity of the xml or the complexity of the stylesheet that is causing this. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. Andy --Boundary_(ID_gkNQ0eApz37UtpNRHxepiw) Content-type: text/html Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT xsltApplyOneTemplate

Hi,
I am having a problem with applying a stylesheet. Most of the xml docs and stylesheets we are using are processed in a relatively short time, less than a second. However we have on the at is taking almost a minute. I have traced it down to the xsltApplOneTemplate being called over 39,000 times. What I am trying to figure out is if it is the complexity of the xml or the complexity of the stylesheet that is causing this. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.

Andy

--Boundary_(ID_gkNQ0eApz37UtpNRHxepiw)-- From veillard@redhat.com Thu Apr 10 15:54:07 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: xslt@gnome.org Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com [66.187.233.200]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 510751894C for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 15:54:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from veillard@localhost) by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.0) id h3AJs6217249 for xslt@gnome.org; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 15:54:06 -0400 Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 15:54:06 -0400 From: Daniel Veillard To: xslt@gnome.org Subject: Re: [xslt] xsltApplyOneTemplate Message-ID: <20030410155406.O28785@redhat.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from aduhon@firstam.com on Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 01:32:07PM -0500 Sender: xslt-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: xslt-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: xslt@gnome.org X-Loop: xslt@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: xslt@gnome.org X-Reply-To: veillard@redhat.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: The Gnome XSLT library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 01:32:07PM -0500, Duhon, Andrew wrote: > Hi, > I am having a problem with applying a stylesheet. Most of the xml > docs and stylesheets we are using are processed in a relatively short time, > less than a second. However we have on the at is taking almost a minute. I > have traced it down to the xsltApplOneTemplate being called over 39,000 > times. What I am trying to figure out is if it is the complexity of the xml > or the complexity of the stylesheet that is causing this. Any feedback would > be greatly appreciated. Without any useful data, the answer is "both" Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/ veillard@redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ From srperan@sherlock.dif.um.es Fri Apr 11 04:55:21 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: xslt@gnome.org Received: from unimur.um.es (unknown [155.54.1.1]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8427218500 for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 04:55:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sherlock (sherlock.dif.um.es [155.54.15.166]) by unimur.um.es (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA08050 for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 10:55:12 +0200 (MEST) From: srperan@sherlock.dif.um.es Received: from srperan by sherlock with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 193uOl-0006pH-00 for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 11:00:39 +0200 Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 11:00:39 +0200 To: xslt@gnome.org Subject: Re: [xslt] xsltApplyOneTemplate Message-ID: <20030411090039.GA26178@sherlock.dif.um.es> References: <20030410155406.O28785@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030410155406.O28785@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Sender: xslt-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: xslt-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: xslt@gnome.org X-Loop: xslt@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: xslt@gnome.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: The Gnome XSLT library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 03:54:06PM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote: > On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 01:32:07PM -0500, Duhon, Andrew wrote: > > Hi, > > I am having a problem with applying a stylesheet. Most of the xml > > docs and stylesheets we are using are processed in a relatively short time, > > less than a second. However we have on the at is taking almost a minute. I > > have traced it down to the xsltApplOneTemplate being called over 39,000 > > times. What I am trying to figure out is if it is the complexity of the xml > > or the complexity of the stylesheet that is causing this. Any feedback would > > be greatly appreciated. > > Without any useful data, the answer is "both" > > Daniel > > Yes, in this list you must paste your social security number, shoes size and at least the 80% of your source code if you want an answer. -- > Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/ > veillard@redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ > http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ > _______________________________________________ > xslt mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/ > xslt@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xslt From veillard@redhat.com Fri Apr 11 05:19:37 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: xslt@gnome.org Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com [66.187.233.200]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00E0618444 for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 05:19:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from veillard@localhost) by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.0) id h3B9Ja920199 for xslt@gnome.org; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 05:19:36 -0400 Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 05:19:36 -0400 From: Daniel Veillard To: xslt@gnome.org Subject: Re: [xslt] xsltApplyOneTemplate Message-ID: <20030411051936.P28785@redhat.com> References: <20030410155406.O28785@redhat.com> <20030411090039.GA26178@sherlock.dif.um.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20030411090039.GA26178@sherlock.dif.um.es>; from srperan@sherlock.dif.um.es on Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 11:00:39AM +0200 Sender: xslt-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: xslt-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: xslt@gnome.org X-Loop: xslt@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: xslt@gnome.org X-Reply-To: veillard@redhat.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: The Gnome XSLT library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 11:00:39AM +0200, srperan@sherlock.dif.um.es wrote: > On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 03:54:06PM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 01:32:07PM -0500, Duhon, Andrew wrote: > > > Hi, > > > I am having a problem with applying a stylesheet. Most of the xml > > > docs and stylesheets we are using are processed in a relatively short time, > > > less than a second. However we have on the at is taking almost a minute. I > > > have traced it down to the xsltApplOneTemplate being called over 39,000 > > > times. What I am trying to figure out is if it is the complexity of the xml > > > or the complexity of the stylesheet that is causing this. Any feedback would > > > be greatly appreciated. > > > > Without any useful data, the answer is "both" > > Yes, in this list you must paste your social security number, shoes size not having the slightliest idea of what his data looks like nor for the stylesheet, it's completely impossible to give any informations about performance results. So it's generic information about XSLT performances, and yes it heavilly depends BOTH on the stylesheet AND on the data processed (and the software used to do the XSLT transformation). The exact same question uneditaed could have been posted on any other XSLT related mailing-list there is nothing specific to libxslt in the question and nothing allowing to make a more precise answer. > and at least the 80% of your source code if you want an answer. That's your point of view, not mine. I simply don't have time to debug code from people using the libraries. I state that very clearly, don't send me code unless it's obvious I won't spend time examining it because I simply can't. The only thing I immediately noticed in your code is that it's a memory leak generator, you never seem to free the structures used, even when they are only referenced as local variable and not passed on exit of the function. Again I don't have time to debug other's people code, I think I do already quite enough for the community and I need to sleep sometimes. So take your rant back, use a debugger and stop whining. Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/ veillard@redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ From rm@mh-freiburg.de Fri Apr 11 06:01:35 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: xslt@gnome.org Received: from forte.mh-freiburg.de (mail.mh-freiburg.de [193.197.131.2]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7668A183DE for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 06:01:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from forte (forte [127.0.0.1]) by forte.mh-freiburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08E7B1B3347 for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 12:01:35 +0200 (MEST) Received: from forte.mh-freiburg.de (forte [127.0.0.1]) by forte (AvMailGate-2.0.1.10) id 24749-2543F5DE; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 12:01:15 +0200 Received: by forte.mh-freiburg.de (Postfix, from userid 104) id 015221B3347; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 12:01:14 +0200 (MEST) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 12:01:14 +0200 To: xslt@gnome.org Subject: Re: [xslt] Question about white space output Message-ID: <20030411120114.A23164@forte.mh-freiburg.de> References: <20030410083807.14118.27712.Mailman@moniker.gnome.org> <20030410094416.GB22874@sherlock.dif.um.es> <20030410061749.C28785@redhat.com> <20030410113442.GA23217@sherlock.dif.um.es> <16021.24227.629044.347232@morus.xipolis.net> <20030410155919.GA24152@sherlock.dif.um.es> <20030410180210.A9654@forte.mh-freiburg.de> <20030410164653.GA24674@sherlock.dif.um.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.17i In-Reply-To: <20030410164653.GA24674@sherlock.dif.um.es>; from srperan@sherlock.dif.um.es on Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 06:46:53PM +0200 From: rm@mh-freiburg.de (Le grande pinguin) X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir MailGate (version: 2.0.1.10; AVE: 6.19.0.3; VDF: 6.19.0.6; host: forte) Sender: xslt-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: xslt-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: xslt@gnome.org X-Loop: xslt@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: xslt@gnome.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: The Gnome XSLT library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 06:46:53PM +0200, srperan@sherlock.dif.um.es wrote: > > [...] > > This is the basic code for the parsing : > int XSLTProcess::convert() { > // process the input file and get the converted file through stdout > > xsltStylesheetPtr cur; > xmlDocPtr doc, res; > const char *params[16 + 1]; > > params[0] = NULL; > > > > //Read the stylesheet > cur = xsltParseStylesheetFile(inputXSLFile); > > //Get the xmlDoctr > doc = inputXMLTree.getXMLDoc(); > > // if (cur == NULL) > // cout << "hola mundo\n\n"; > > //Apply stylesheet > res = xsltApplyStylesheet(cur, doc, params); > > //and save the output file Why don't you start up your debugger and set a breakpoint on the following function? Once debugger stops at the call to this function you can step in and have a look at the (xmlChar *) 'encoding' (the pointer gets set by the macro XSLT_GET_IMPORT_PTR which expands to a while loop that iterates through the linked list of imported stylesheets). > xsltSaveResultToFile(stdout, res, cur); hth Ralf Mattes From morus@tanto-xipolis.de Fri Apr 11 06:50:34 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: xslt@gnome.org Received: from mail.tanto-xipolis.de (mail.xipolis.net [213.61.178.42]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CE0018974 for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 06:50:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from morus.xipolis.net (unknown [10.0.1.4]) by mail.tanto-xipolis.de (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.3 (i386)) with ESMTP id 1FDE019B71A; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 12:50:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from morus@localhost) by morus.xipolis.net (8.11.6/8.11.6/SuSE Linux 0.5) id h3BAono23418; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 12:50:49 +0200 From: Morus Walter MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16022.40457.127304.338847@morus.xipolis.net> Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 12:50:49 +0200 To: xslt@gnome.org, srperan@sherlock.dif.um.es Subject: Re: [xslt] xsltApplyOneTemplate In-Reply-To: <20030411090039.GA26178@sherlock.dif.um.es> References: <20030410155406.O28785@redhat.com> <20030411090039.GA26178@sherlock.dif.um.es> X-Mailer: VM 6.95 under 21.4 (patch 4) "Artificial Intelligence" XEmacs Lucid Sender: xslt-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: xslt-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: xslt@gnome.org X-Loop: xslt@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: xslt@gnome.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: The Gnome XSLT library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: srperan@sherlock.dif.um.es writes: > > Yes, in this list you must paste your social security number, shoes size > and at least the 80% of your source code if you want an answer. > I suggest that you read http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html and reconsider what you did here. HTH Morus From srperan@sherlock.dif.um.es Fri Apr 11 07:33:43 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: xslt@gnome.org Received: from unimur.um.es (unknown [155.54.1.1]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D8E8180E0 for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 07:33:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sherlock (sherlock.dif.um.es [155.54.15.166]) by unimur.um.es (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA17933 for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 13:33:41 +0200 (MEST) From: srperan@sherlock.dif.um.es Received: from srperan by sherlock with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 193wsA-0006sb-00 for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 13:39:10 +0200 Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 13:39:10 +0200 To: xslt@gnome.org Subject: Re: [xslt] xsltApplyOneTemplate Message-ID: <20030411113910.GA26411@sherlock.dif.um.es> References: <20030410155406.O28785@redhat.com> <20030411090039.GA26178@sherlock.dif.um.es> <16022.40457.127304.338847@morus.xipolis.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <16022.40457.127304.338847@morus.xipolis.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Sender: xslt-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: xslt-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: xslt@gnome.org X-Loop: xslt@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: xslt@gnome.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: The Gnome XSLT library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 12:50:49PM +0200, Morus Walter wrote: > srperan@sherlock.dif.um.es writes: > > > > Yes, in this list you must paste your social security number, shoes size > > and at least the 80% of your source code if you want an answer. > > > I suggest that you read > http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html > and reconsider what you did here. > > HTH > Morus > Just joking. Where is your humor sense? ;) Well, This is my last post to this list and I want to say something I really hate those hackers rules, I think it is totally in the wrong way, but I will paste here one : http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/hacker-howto.html#believe4 Usually good hackers as probably you are, become unpleasant people. I have been subscribed to many mail list and in some of them I have been an experienced "hacker" about the list theme and when somebody ask you something you think is a stupid question you get angry with this people and say those thing like RTFM or STFW. But one day I noticed that this behaviour just took me to be in a foul mood. I found out that this was against my way of living and I decided to change. It was difficult, but it helpep me to make friends and be a better person. Thanks for your patience. I will solve my problem myself. Jose _______________________________________________ > xslt mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/ > xslt@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xslt From hrauch@heitec.de Fri Apr 11 08:36:24 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: xslt@gnome.org Received: from christel.heitec.net (christel.heitec.net [213.70.109.3]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4057318469 for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 08:36:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from prag.info.er.heitec.net (paladin.heitec.net [193.101.232.30]) by christel.heitec.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 197FAB820F; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 14:36:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: by prag.info.er.heitec.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 42E9D6C33; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 14:36:16 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 14:36:16 +0200 From: Holger Rauch To: xslt@gnome.org, srperan@sherlock.dif.um.es Subject: Re: [xslt] xsltApplyOneTemplate Message-ID: <20030411123616.GA5036@heitec.net> Mail-Followup-To: xslt@gnome.org, srperan@sherlock.dif.um.es References: <20030410155406.O28785@redhat.com> <20030411090039.GA26178@sherlock.dif.um.es> <16022.40457.127304.338847@morus.xipolis.net> <20030411113910.GA26411@sherlock.dif.um.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030411113910.GA26411@sherlock.dif.um.es> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Organization: HEITEC AG Sender: xslt-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: xslt-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: xslt@gnome.org X-Loop: xslt@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: xslt@gnome.org X-Reply-To: xslt@gnome.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: The Gnome XSLT library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Fri, 11 Apr 2003, srperan@sherlock.dif.um.es wrote: > [...] > Just joking. Where is your humor sense? ;) Denying people information when they specifically ask for it has got nothing whatsoever to do with a sense of humor. It's just plain ignorance. > Well, This is my last post to this list and I want to say something > I really hate those hackers rules, These are not "hackers rules", but rather rules that ensure that the people being willing to answer questions also have time for further libxslt development. (I also found libxslt a bit difficult to handle in the beginning, but I was willing to respect that those who are subscribed to this and/or the libml2 maling list cannot spend all their time answering questions asked by those who don't want to abide by the rules. > Usually good hackers as probably you are, become unpleasant people. How can you judge people as being unpleasant without knowing them better? > I have been subscribed to many mail list and in some of them I have been > an experienced "hacker" about the list theme and when somebody ask you > something you think is a stupid question you get angry with this people > and say those thing like RTFM or STFW. I think nobody considered your question stupid. You should be able to make a distinction between a asking stupid question and not having provided relevant information (the latter applies to you). Greetings, Holger From aduhon@firstam.com Fri Apr 11 08:48:43 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: xslt@gnome.org Received: from fada1smt02.firstam-reis.com (mail2.firstam-reis.com [206.103.66.183]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E164A189A6 for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 08:48:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from fada1sxc02.firstam-reis.com (fada1sxc02.firstam-reis.com [172.16.3.2]) by fada1smt02.FirstAm-REIS.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #40534) with ESMTP id <0HD6000FEJGBPW@fada1smt02.FirstAm-REIS.com> for xslt@gnome.org; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 07:45:48 -0500 (CDT) Received: by fada1sxc02.firstam-reis.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <2NVW22ZC>; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 07:48:36 -0500 Content-return: allowed Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 07:48:36 -0500 From: "Duhon, Andrew" Subject: RE: [xslt] xsltApplyOneTemplate To: "'xslt@gnome.org'" , srperan@sherlock.dif.um.es Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_4XUWWBUXtQVatGdg4h3g1g)" Sender: xslt-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: xslt-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: xslt@gnome.org X-Loop: xslt@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: xslt@gnome.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: The Gnome XSLT library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. --Boundary_(ID_4XUWWBUXtQVatGdg4h3g1g) Content-type: text/plain Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT This is why I didn't want to join this list in the first place. I only did it to get a simple answer to a simple question. I got it. Not as detailed as I would have liked, but I do respect the gentleman's time. Regardless, this has now turned into a thread about the guy who used Daniel's response to me to as an opportunity to take a jab or joke, whichever. So I don't any option but to unsubscribe from this list. Andy p.s. Daniel I do appreciate you taking the time to respond to my post. -----Original Message----- From: Holger Rauch [mailto:holger.rauch@heitec.de] Sent: Friday, April 11, 2003 7:36 AM To: xslt@gnome.org; srperan@sherlock.dif.um.es Subject: Re: [xslt] xsltApplyOneTemplate On Fri, 11 Apr 2003, srperan@sherlock.dif.um.es wrote: > [...] > Just joking. Where is your humor sense? ;) Denying people information when they specifically ask for it has got nothing whatsoever to do with a sense of humor. It's just plain ignorance. > Well, This is my last post to this list and I want to say something I > really hate those hackers rules, These are not "hackers rules", but rather rules that ensure that the people being willing to answer questions also have time for further libxslt development. (I also found libxslt a bit difficult to handle in the beginning, but I was willing to respect that those who are subscribed to this and/or the libml2 maling list cannot spend all their time answering questions asked by those who don't want to abide by the rules. > Usually good hackers as probably you are, become unpleasant people. How can you judge people as being unpleasant without knowing them better? > I have been subscribed to many mail list and in some of them I have > been an experienced "hacker" about the list theme and when somebody > ask you something you think is a stupid question you get angry with > this people and say those thing like RTFM or STFW. I think nobody considered your question stupid. You should be able to make a distinction between a asking stupid question and not having provided relevant information (the latter applies to you). Greetings, Holger _______________________________________________ xslt mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/ xslt@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xslt --Boundary_(ID_4XUWWBUXtQVatGdg4h3g1g) Content-type: text/html Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT RE: [xslt] xsltApplyOneTemplate

This is why I didn't want to join this list in the first place. I only did it to get a simple answer to a simple question. I got it. Not as detailed as I would have liked, but I do respect the gentleman's time. Regardless, this has now turned into a thread about the guy who used Daniel's response to me to as an opportunity to take a jab or joke, whichever. So I don't any option but to unsubscribe from this list.

Andy

p.s. Daniel I do appreciate you taking the time to respond to my post.

-----Original Message-----
From: Holger Rauch [mailto:holger.rauch@heitec.de]
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2003 7:36 AM
To: xslt@gnome.org; srperan@sherlock.dif.um.es
Subject: Re: [xslt] xsltApplyOneTemplate

On Fri, 11 Apr 2003, srperan@sherlock.dif.um.es wrote:

> [...]
> Just joking. Where is your humor sense? ;)

Denying people information when they specifically ask for it has got nothing whatsoever to do with a sense of humor. It's just plain ignorance.

> Well, This is my last post to this list and I want to say something I
> really hate those hackers rules,

These are not "hackers rules", but rather rules that ensure that the people being willing to answer questions also have time for further libxslt development. (I also found libxslt a bit difficult to handle in the beginning, but I was willing to respect that those who are subscribed to this and/or the libml2 maling list cannot spend all their time answering questions asked by those who don't want to abide by the rules.

> Usually good hackers as probably you are, become unpleasant people.

How can you judge people as being unpleasant without knowing them better?

> I have been subscribed to many mail list and in some of them I have
> been an experienced "hacker" about the list theme and when somebody
> ask you something you think is a stupid question you get angry with
> this people and say those thing like RTFM or STFW.

I think nobody considered your question stupid. You should be able to make a distinction between a asking stupid question and not having provided relevant information (the latter applies to you).

Greetings,

Holger
_______________________________________________
xslt mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/ xslt@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xslt

--Boundary_(ID_4XUWWBUXtQVatGdg4h3g1g)-- From veillard@redhat.com Fri Apr 11 09:02:55 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: xslt@gnome.org Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com [66.187.233.200]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D145A1811B for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 09:02:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from veillard@localhost) by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.0) id h3BD2sw23010; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 09:02:54 -0400 Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 09:02:54 -0400 From: Daniel Veillard To: xslt@gnome.org Cc: srperan@sherlock.dif.um.es Subject: Re: [xslt] xsltApplyOneTemplate Message-ID: <20030411090254.W28785@redhat.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from aduhon@firstam.com on Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 07:48:36AM -0500 Sender: xslt-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: xslt-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: xslt@gnome.org X-Loop: xslt@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: xslt@gnome.org X-Reply-To: veillard@redhat.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: The Gnome XSLT library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 07:48:36AM -0500, Duhon, Andrew wrote: > This is why I didn't want to join this list in the first place. I only did > it to get a simple answer to a simple question. I got it. Not as detailed as > I would have liked, but I do respect the gentleman's time. Regardless, this It's not a simple question at all. It's a short question, but very very hard to answer when having a full context to analyze it. And without context, it's just impossible to answer in a detailed fashion, and when I say impossible I really mean *impossible* . That's why when I bounced your original message I asked: 1/ that you subscribe to the list 2/ that you follow the rules and gave a pointer to the http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/bug.html page I expected you would take the time to actually provide the data as explained by that page. You did not. You simply subscribed and posted back the exact same question without any sort of context. Hence my laconic answer. I cannot force you to give me the data I need to answer your question in a meaningful way. You cannot force me to give you uninformed answers either. I'm just getting angry at the people who thing what I say can be ignored, get a consultant, pay him massive amount of cash and then maybe you will get the uninformed answer you wanted at least I'm sure you will consider his answer *because you paid for it* ! Providing free expertise seems only the best way to get abused including moraly, it doesn't mean I'm gonna stop, but it does mean I feel more and more morally acceptable to drop request for help, or simply tell people to fuck off ... Abuse of free wealth seems the best way to loose it ! Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/ veillard@redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ From sebastian.rahtz@computing-services.oxford.ac.uk Fri Apr 11 09:56:18 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: xslt@gnome.org Received: from oxmail.ox.ac.uk (oxmail2.ox.ac.uk [163.1.2.2]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37637189EB for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 09:56:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtp0.herald.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.0.246]) by oxmail.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 193z0q-0007AS-7q; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 14:56:16 +0100 Received: from spqr.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.15.17]) by smtp0.herald.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 193z0q-0000uH-00; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 14:56:16 +0100 Subject: Re: [xslt] xsltApplyOneTemplate From: Sebastian Rahtz To: xslt@gnome.org Cc: srperan@sherlock.dif.um.es In-Reply-To: <20030411090254.W28785@redhat.com> References: <20030411090254.W28785@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: OUCS Message-Id: <1050065031.32445.78.camel@spqr.oucs.ox.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.0 Date: 11 Apr 2003 14:43:51 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xslt-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: xslt-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: xslt@gnome.org X-Loop: xslt@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: xslt@gnome.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: The Gnome XSLT library mailing-list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Just for the record, I think Daniel's attitude to questions is fine! It's consistent and it's understandable. On the occasions I have had libxml/xslt problems, I have had answers which got better as I asked better questions (and vice versa :-}), which seems admirable. I wish more people were so straightforward. -- Sebastian Rahtz OUCS Information Manager 13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431 From kbuchcik@4commerce.de Fri Apr 11 12:36:53 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: xslt@gnome.org Received: from mailc0910.dte2k.de (mail.t-intra.de [62.156.147.75]) by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABF9E18540 for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 12:36:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailc0908.dte2k.de ([10.50.185.8]) by mailc0910.dte2k.de with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Fri, 11 Apr 2003 18:36:52 +0200 Received: from kisone ([80.129.162.7]) by mailc0908.dte2k.de with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Fri, 11 Apr 2003 18:36:51 +0200 From: Kasimier Buchcik To: X-Priority: 3 Received: from emission [10.254.2.2] by kisone [10.254.2.2] with SMTP eMission ESMTPServer; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 18:31:55 +0200 Received: from 4commerce.de (LIBRA [10.1.72.2]) by kisone.kisnet.de with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id 2VMFS60Q; Fri, 11 Apr 2003 18:31:54 +0200 Message-ID: <3E96EE63.7010405@4commerce.de> Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 18:33:39 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030210 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en X-eMessageService: eMission.SMTPServer Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Apr 2003 16:36:52.0007 (UTC) FILETIME=[8E363B70:01C30048] Subject: [xslt] "libxslt with thread-enabled libxml2?" Sender: xslt-admin@gnome.org Errors-To: xslt-admin@gnome.org X-BeenThere: xslt@gnome.org X-Loop: xslt@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: xslt@gnome.org List-Help: