From sikamikaniboots@yahoo.fr Sun Jun 1 13:12:46 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gvfs-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gvfs-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5089750079 for ; Sun, 1 Jun 2008 13:12:46 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.273 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.273 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.185, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, L_P0F_Unix=-1, MIME_HTML_ONLY=1.457] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: FreeBSD 6.x (1) (up: 11574 hrs), (distance 17, link: ethernet/modem), [87.248.110.138] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5maJxnIMDTix for ; Sun, 1 Jun 2008 13:12:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from n21.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (n21.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [87.248.110.138]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 86CF1750072 for ; Sun, 1 Jun 2008 13:12:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [217.12.4.215] by n21.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Jun 2008 13:12:36 -0000 Received: from [87.248.111.148] by t2.bullet.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Jun 2008 13:12:36 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp205.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Jun 2008 13:12:36 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 581847.55784.bm@omp205.mail.ukl.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 78281 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2008 13:12:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.2?) (sikamikaniboots@86.199.200.219 with plain) by smtp102.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 1 Jun 2008 13:12:36 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: lZn7VccVM1nN_r0WP3GuRqI4U0BSfrkyMwf6.B6SwxThh2qZSdJmgPQ9L2HsCeF.t15BGXuJ0vXVjaq5cLPl1tW2hdnjYVG03bqFkBqbuQyUmYjuOKxS1ny2fuIsZmE4J7nfPvLHXZ2GS51bkeTm0ZF5 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <4842A034.3020703@yahoo.fr> Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2008 15:12:20 +0200 From: Sikamikaniboots User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080505) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gvfs-list@gnome.org Subject: user-mountable nfs filesystems Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 01 Jun 2008 16:40:01 +0000 X-BeenThere: gvfs-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussons about the gvfs virtual filesystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2008 13:12:47 -0000 Hi!
There's a bug report in debian and ubuntu that seems to be caused by gvfs.
Can a developer have a look at it please?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/195180
I'm really missing this feature.
Thanks
From david@fubar.dk Sun Jun 1 17:37:06 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gvfs-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gvfs-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE1B6750050 for ; Sun, 1 Jun 2008 17:37:06 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.64 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.64 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.74, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) (up: 6238 hrs), (distance 16, link: ethernet/modem), [128.177.28.166] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S1fkZWb6havd for ; Sun, 1 Jun 2008 17:36:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from zelenka.fubar.dk (128-177-28-166.ip.openhosting.com [128.177.28.166]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0746275010F for ; Sun, 1 Jun 2008 17:36:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.1.102] (zelenka.fubar.dk [127.0.0.1]) by zelenka.fubar.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA158D8CD7D; Sun, 1 Jun 2008 13:36:35 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: user-mountable nfs filesystems From: David Zeuthen To: Sikamikaniboots In-Reply-To: <4842A034.3020703@yahoo.fr> References: <4842A034.3020703@yahoo.fr> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2008 13:36:33 -0400 Message-Id: <1212341793.7918.1.camel@x61.fubar.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.1 (2.22.1-2.fc9) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: gvfs-list@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gvfs-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussons about the gvfs virtual filesystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2008 17:37:07 -0000 On Sun, 2008-06-01 at 15:12 +0200, Sikamikaniboots wrote: > Hi! > There's a bug report in debian and ubuntu that seems to be caused by > gvfs. > Can a developer have a look at it please? > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/195180 > I'm really missing this feature. Only mounts in /media are shown; the bug indicates the mounts are elsewhere (in /nfs). Moving them to /media should work otherwise it's a bug. David From sikamikaniboots@yahoo.fr Sun Jun 1 18:59:12 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gvfs-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gvfs-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ECBD750177 for ; Sun, 1 Jun 2008 18:59:12 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.141 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.141 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, L_P0F_Unix=-1, MIME_HTML_ONLY=1.457] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: FreeBSD 6.x (1) (up: 11662 hrs), (distance 16, link: ethernet/modem), [87.248.110.137] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lLrm5SwqrC3m for ; Sun, 1 Jun 2008 18:59:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from n20.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (n20.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [87.248.110.137]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CF2F97500D7 for ; Sun, 1 Jun 2008 18:59:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [217.12.4.215] by n20.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Jun 2008 18:59:01 -0000 Received: from [87.248.110.118] by t2.bullet.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Jun 2008 18:59:01 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp223.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Jun 2008 18:59:01 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 826350.81111.bm@omp223.mail.ukl.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 68131 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2008 18:59:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.2?) (sikamikaniboots@86.199.200.219 with plain) by smtp102.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 1 Jun 2008 18:59:01 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: v69LOysVM1mkMFec8WtdhgZSwNzTReqFUbYHnW1IbWaq_myqctqPksqY0Bb7O4fB40s4xGOdYzqQB5XCVqjVkwG4zN4PhUHqfXIR5_8BLUg.DjNwwqOQe_0w54KiEK4cFnjvYnehexdu3ZDsJDMvnKAeUaWER3TN_xxU0yVdv6uiQXPxMfIqpUUGNF9I6Wtj9pGQHb8fzqlXHtUu.dN. X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <4842F174.2020406@yahoo.fr> Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2008 20:59:00 +0200 From: Sikamikaniboots User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080505) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Zeuthen Subject: Re: user-mountable nfs filesystems References: <4842A034.3020703@yahoo.fr> <1212341793.7918.1.camel@x61.fubar.dk> In-Reply-To: <1212341793.7918.1.camel@x61.fubar.dk> Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 01 Jun 2008 19:04:39 +0000 Cc: gvfs-list@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gvfs-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussons about the gvfs virtual filesystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2008 18:59:12 -0000 My shares have always been in /media but I'm concerned by this bug. This is the nfs part of my /etc/fstab:

192.168.1.3:/media/data /media/rob_data nfs user,noauto 0 0
192.168.1.3:/media/data2 /media/rob_data2 nfs user,noauto 0 0

Should I open a bug report? (where?)
Thanks!

David Zeuthen wrote :

On Sun, 2008-06-01 at 15:12 +0200, Sikamikaniboots wrote:

Hi!
There's a bug report in debian and ubuntu that seems to be caused by
gvfs.
Can a developer have a look at it please?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/195180
I'm really missing this feature.


Only mounts in /media are shown; the bug indicates the mounts are
elsewhere (in /nfs). Moving them to /media should work otherwise it's a
bug.

       David

From david@fubar.dk Sun Jun 1 19:47:58 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gvfs-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gvfs-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA6987500A7 for ; Sun, 1 Jun 2008 19:47:58 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.563 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.563 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.74, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1, TW_GV=0.077] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) (up: 6243 hrs), (distance 16, link: ethernet/modem), [128.177.28.166] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A-kkh+sfgWqV for ; Sun, 1 Jun 2008 19:47:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from zelenka.fubar.dk (128-177-28-166.ip.openhosting.com [128.177.28.166]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07E1C750050 for ; Sun, 1 Jun 2008 19:47:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.1.102] (zelenka.fubar.dk [127.0.0.1]) by zelenka.fubar.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F3EAD8CD7D; Sun, 1 Jun 2008 15:47:50 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: user-mountable nfs filesystems From: David Zeuthen To: Sikamikaniboots In-Reply-To: <4842F174.2020406@yahoo.fr> References: <4842A034.3020703@yahoo.fr> <1212341793.7918.1.camel@x61.fubar.dk> <4842F174.2020406@yahoo.fr> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2008 15:47:47 -0400 Message-Id: <1212349667.7918.5.camel@x61.fubar.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.1 (2.22.1-2.fc9) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: gvfs-list@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gvfs-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussons about the gvfs virtual filesystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2008 19:47:58 -0000 On Sun, 2008-06-01 at 20:59 +0200, Sikamikaniboots wrote: > My shares have always been in /media but I'm concerned by this bug. > This is the nfs part of my /etc/fstab: > > 192.168.1.3:/media/data /media/rob_data nfs > user,noauto 0 0 > 192.168.1.3:/media/data2 /media/rob_data2 nfs user,noauto > 0 0 > > Should I open a bug report? (where?) Please open a bug on bugzilla.gnome.org against the gvfs product, component 'hal volume monitor'. Include the contents of 'cat /etc/mtab', 'cat /etc/fstab', 'cat /proc/mounts' and 'gvfs-mount -li'. Thanks. David From sikamikaniboots@yahoo.fr Mon Jun 2 18:13:32 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gvfs-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gvfs-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A9C1750435 for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2008 18:13:32 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.064 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.064 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, L_P0F_Unix=-1, MIME_HTML_ONLY=1.457, TW_GV=0.077] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: FreeBSD 6.x (1) (up: 11856 hrs), (distance 17, link: ethernet/modem), [87.248.110.138] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pav9gjjORuUz for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2008 18:13:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from n21.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (n21.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [87.248.110.138]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8272A750254 for ; Mon, 2 Jun 2008 18:13:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [217.146.182.179] by n21.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Jun 2008 18:12:58 -0000 Received: from [87.248.111.145] by t5.bullet.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Jun 2008 18:12:58 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp202.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Jun 2008 18:12:58 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 429825.15445.bm@omp202.mail.ukl.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 46150 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2008 18:01:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.2?) (sikamikaniboots@86.195.125.220 with plain) by smtp102.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Jun 2008 18:01:26 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: q5lWfzcVM1ndYg6CuuvXJXbTmFgQ37krXm4ipEGtiXdC_Qw9IUB8liRCdzhXhIaAhVyCoXNhfa51BHuUYQSrCqb2bzPTjSSXIhBcEp0EUCbvp8T8rVdnJpn2LcFILYMcSlMFZqOxaYdEygNPevYEzb6cagmEPDAYPc1l4sQ8tLrtGEcxMu.zPmCRMuASAEFfV0DwVoztFEI.bk7RT.Rx X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <4844356B.20400@yahoo.fr> Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2008 20:01:15 +0200 From: Sikamikaniboots User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080505) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Zeuthen Subject: Re: user-mountable nfs filesystems References: <4842A034.3020703@yahoo.fr> <1212341793.7918.1.camel@x61.fubar.dk> <4842F174.2020406@yahoo.fr> <1212349667.7918.5.camel@x61.fubar.dk> In-Reply-To: <1212349667.7918.5.camel@x61.fubar.dk> Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: gvfs-list@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gvfs-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussons about the gvfs virtual filesystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2008 18:13:32 -0000 The bug report is done, there:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=536292
Thanks!

David Zeuthen a écrit :

On Sun, 2008-06-01 at 20:59 +0200, Sikamikaniboots wrote:

My shares have always been in /media but I'm concerned by this bug.
This is the nfs part of my /etc/fstab:

192.168.1.3:/media/data        /media/rob_data        nfs
user,noauto    0    0
192.168.1.3:/media/data2    /media/rob_data2    nfs    user,noauto
0    0

Should I open a bug report? (where?)


Please open a bug on bugzilla.gnome.org against the gvfs product,
component 'hal volume monitor'. Include the contents of 'cat /etc/mtab',
'cat /etc/fstab', 'cat /proc/mounts' and 'gvfs-mount -li'. Thanks.

      David

From hpj@novell.com Wed Jun 4 00:05:50 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gvfs-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gvfs-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BF637502E5; Wed, 4 Jun 2008 00:05:50 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.4-2.6 (up: 7379 hrs), (distance 25, link: ethernet/modem), [195.135.221.2] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R-740Wb2Dc1S; Wed, 4 Jun 2008 00:05:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from emea5-mh.id5.novell.com (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.221.2]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1773750237; Wed, 4 Jun 2008 00:05:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [10.0.0.24] ([149.44.162.75]) by emea5-mh.id5.novell.com with ESMTP (TLS encrypted); Wed, 04 Jun 2008 02:05:37 +0200 Subject: Announce: GVFS 0.99.1 From: Hans Petter Jansson To: gnome-announce-list@gnome.org, gvfs-list Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Novell, Inc. Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2008 19:04:11 -0500 Message-Id: <1212537851.24957.36.camel@linux.site> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.1.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: gvfs-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussons about the gvfs virtual filesystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 00:05:50 -0000 At the request of Vincent, and with apologies to Christian, I released GVFS 0.99.1 just now. This release is in the unstable series, but it has received mostly bug fixes relative to the last stable release, so I predict few (if any) regressions. Download location ================= http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/gvfs/0.99/ Changes since GVFS 0.2.2 split ============================== * Fix directory copy/delete problems. * Fuse daemon robustness fixes. * Allow mounting non-standard ISO images. * Better username/domain tests on mount spec. * Require gphoto >= 2.4.0. * Fix strdup()/g_free() confusion. * Use consistent translatable strings for mount and volume. * Plug some memory leaks. * Many smaller bug fixes. * Translation updates: ar (Djihed Afifi, Khaled Hosny), bg (Alexander Shopov), et (Ivar Smolin), he (Yair Hershkovitz), nb (Kjartan Maraas), tr (Baris Cicek), vi (Clytie Siddall) -- Hans Petter From daniel.r.kegel@gmail.com Sun Jun 8 21:33:14 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gvfs-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gvfs-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AE877500AA for ; Sun, 8 Jun 2008 21:33:14 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) (firewall!) (up: 3792 hrs), (distance 13, link: (Google 2)), [209.85.198.225] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V4XXhmM-cdm6 for ; Sun, 8 Jun 2008 21:33:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.225]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59DFF75013B for ; Sun, 8 Jun 2008 21:33:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id f6so1844154rvb.3 for ; Sun, 08 Jun 2008 14:33:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; bh=IwkUbIzzuxhDe9JPw1/I3tAXqXiDNs7z2yXGGAZoPuE=; b=hZlNMuPM0hh/OdOWC00tjgETiFeytTx3FmqAJ1i+ntT5Iybat4wpXHuVPyJ3vChLPf Pt3HaO5UOpjxRcIjmZ20MSaU8DnTr0pVZqNa0DYnKLsPwDBNT95AE2EgkYssZIoy30Vr HCddtiGXI1+kjGizoj6Eahp22RoZez0D6qla8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; b=SztO88EPDRUGQ+eV1SmaUbPQ7eBtl6HkrTuoxc0i2Gbnex8AQ94mhczr9XqfygwN6y m3gxopxczLHxEFtZWVUlp2tC5rALtRqiE+Q4hrvmB3P67wIqX7Efp3myxTgpRNSDrN5o 7HiP9jeBLs57Tx76bygBwSxRh8MRh+r6BJo/c= Received: by 10.140.201.21 with SMTP id y21mr1589033rvf.259.1212960784057; Sun, 08 Jun 2008 14:33:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.196.15 with HTTP; Sun, 8 Jun 2008 14:33:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 14:33:03 -0700 From: "Dan Kegel" Sender: daniel.r.kegel@gmail.com To: gvfs-list@gnome.org Subject: gvfs and mmap()? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Google-Sender-Auth: b2e5036add42a459 X-BeenThere: gvfs-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussons about the gvfs virtual filesystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2008 21:33:14 -0000 Can one use mmap() with filesystems mounted via gvfs? http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/sugar/2008-March/004728.html and http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13783 imply that the answer is 'no'. If so, this is a significant limitation, as at least one version of Excel seems to use memory mapping to open documents. From hpj@novell.com Sun Jun 8 23:36:26 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gvfs-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gvfs-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DAC375014B for ; Sun, 8 Jun 2008 23:36:26 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.522 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.522 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, TW_GV=0.077] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.4-2.6 (up: 8575 hrs), (distance 25, link: ethernet/modem), [195.135.221.2] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PPNcyYXfX+yY for ; Sun, 8 Jun 2008 23:36:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from emea5-mh.id5.novell.com (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.221.2]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EA5E750078 for ; Sun, 8 Jun 2008 23:36:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [10.0.0.21] ([149.44.162.75]) by emea5-mh.id5.novell.com with ESMTP (TLS encrypted); Mon, 09 Jun 2008 01:35:57 +0200 Subject: Re: gvfs and mmap()? From: Hans Petter Jansson To: Dan Kegel In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Novell, Inc. Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2008 18:35:42 -0500 Message-Id: <1212968142.4149.20.camel@linux.site> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.1.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: gvfs-list@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gvfs-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussons about the gvfs virtual filesystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2008 23:36:26 -0000 On Sun, 2008-06-08 at 14:33 -0700, Dan Kegel wrote: > Can one use mmap() with filesystems mounted via gvfs? > http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/sugar/2008-March/004728.html > and > http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13783 > imply that the answer is 'no'. > > If so, this is a significant limitation, as at least one version of > Excel seems to use memory mapping to open documents. You can't mmap() files using the GVFS API. That's essentially what the first link says. However, since I assume Excel doesn't use the GVFS API, but plain POSIX to access the local file system, I assume you're talking about the Fuse mounts (each GVFS mount automatically gets a parallel Fuse mount under ~/.gvfs/, for "legacy" apps). These mounts support mmap(), but not shared writable mmaps, which is what Excel is complaining about in the second link. This is a limitation of Fuse itself: http://groups.google.com/group/linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/cdf7859a9f1bc43f However, shared, writable mmaps are being implemented: http://kerneltrap.org/Linux/Fuse_Writable_Mmap I'm not sure what kernel version this appeared/will appear in, but it means your problem will go away at some point. -- Hans Petter From daniel.r.kegel@gmail.com Sun Jun 8 23:45:21 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gvfs-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gvfs-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCFB17500FC for ; Sun, 8 Jun 2008 23:45:21 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.522 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.522 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, TW_GV=0.077] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) (firewall!) (up: 8911 hrs), (distance 15, link: (Google 2)), [74.125.46.28] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s2sKffsacXhN for ; Sun, 8 Jun 2008 23:45:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com (yw-out-2324.google.com [74.125.46.28]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C27875013B for ; Sun, 8 Jun 2008 23:45:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 5so956631ywh.63 for ; Sun, 08 Jun 2008 16:45:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=KOl9OoAT3sg4fTu/73V3dWnb+wKMMv7GLyg7W3s6C6Y=; b=YxGS8obKpmHGdU8BOijc4Na5SK475O6szSyMABGMtqGXDK5o1DDbXou0AGEFTbxzOk kVFoNbPB0SsbzIeLVIAY4cNSQWIa90AzmNsZLQVAZXcUl8yLd5vcW33APaX9oOEkjurZ a0PV3sDdIjo0PLjhK3FiU/Idy3+3KMST7RCfg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=A5rR/Ei6J3gp/4Fo/XNwbzgNqBtQ6ecF3Jl3CtTGIMgu/pEK2STSKh13TpmsUuFCiz w3c9zCUHFQUkPqI5AMIxsTZf9VIIurZo0p77IeMJM1S2RiR7NYBTVoxreO3EiMI1D06Q vJQCMaN3ILcnMgAL6dAfc8PXtGll4mnY74roA= Received: by 10.151.142.16 with SMTP id u16mr5117687ybn.164.1212968711013; Sun, 08 Jun 2008 16:45:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.151.8.14 with HTTP; Sun, 8 Jun 2008 16:45:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 16:45:11 -0700 From: "Dan Kegel" Sender: daniel.r.kegel@gmail.com To: "Hans Petter Jansson" Subject: Re: gvfs and mmap()? In-Reply-To: <1212968142.4149.20.camel@linux.site> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1212968142.4149.20.camel@linux.site> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 3dd9238f3f36446a Cc: gvfs-list@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gvfs-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussons about the gvfs virtual filesystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2008 23:45:22 -0000 On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 4:35 PM, Hans Petter Jansson wrote: > However, since I assume Excel doesn't use the GVFS API, but plain POSIX > to access the local file system, I assume you're talking about the Fuse > mounts (each GVFS mount automatically gets a parallel Fuse mount under > ~/.gvfs/, for "legacy" apps). Right. (This is Excel under Wine.) > These mounts support mmap(), but not shared writable mmaps, which is > what Excel is complaining about in the second link. This is a limitation > of Fuse itself: > > http://groups.google.com/group/linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/cdf7859a9f1bc43f > > However, shared, writable mmaps are being implemented: > > http://kerneltrap.org/Linux/Fuse_Writable_Mmap > > I'm not sure what kernel version this appeared/will appear in, but it > means your problem will go away at some point. Thanks for the info! - Dan From alexl@redhat.com Mon Jun 9 18:43:58 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gvfs-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gvfs-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6694075013B for ; Mon, 9 Jun 2008 18:43:58 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.503 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.503 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=1.942, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, TW_GV=0.077, TW_KR=0.077] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) (NAT!) (up: 7363 hrs), (distance 13, link: GPRS, T1, FreeS/WAN), [66.187.233.31] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8bdZwmXRUA7J for ; Mon, 9 Jun 2008 18:43:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [66.187.233.31]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06325750173 for ; Mon, 9 Jun 2008 18:43:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m59Ihmsv027346 for ; Mon, 9 Jun 2008 14:43:48 -0400 Received: from file.rdu.redhat.com (file.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.147]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m59IhlER032325; Mon, 9 Jun 2008 14:43:47 -0400 Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com (devserv.devel.redhat.com [10.10.36.72]) by file.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m59Ihk4N031723; Mon, 9 Jun 2008 14:43:46 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (sebastian-int.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.221]) by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m59IhjYR005680; Mon, 9 Jun 2008 14:43:46 -0400 Subject: Re: SMB issues From: Alexander Larsson To: tbzatek@redhat.com In-Reply-To: <1211965287.11938.19.camel@tbzatek.englab.brq.redhat.com> References: <1211965287.11938.19.camel@tbzatek.englab.brq.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2008 20:43:44 +0200 Message-Id: <1213037024.16086.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.1 (2.22.1-2.fc9) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.58 on 172.16.52.254 Cc: gvfs-list@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gvfs-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussons about the gvfs virtual filesystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2008 18:43:58 -0000 On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 11:01 +0200, Tomas Bzatek wrote: > Hi, > > I've collected all recent SMB issues in gvfs/Nautilus and made a quick > summary. Some of the issues were discussed with gicmo and seb128 last > week. I wanted to open a discussion on the major design issues before we > start implementing something. > > (Some bugs listed here may be Fedora-only bugs, I haven't started filing > their counterparts in Gnome bugzilla yet). BTW, I saw this commit: 2008-05-21 Christian Kellner * daemon/gvfsbackendsmb.c (do_mount): Set the information on the mount spec *after* having asked the user for credentials since username and domain can be changed by the user. That doesn't look right to me (from a quick look). The mount spec and the uri specified by the user must map one to one, or uri conversion will fail and accessed won't work. This means if the uri specifies no username or domain the registered mountspec should not have any either. It should be the mount spec for the "generic" no-user, no-domain uri. > Authentication in gvfs-smb-browse and gvfs-smb > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=524485 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446822 > - judging from the number of bugs filed after final Fedora 9 release, > people are having problems accessing their SMB shares. The big issue > here is that list of shares differs with different username. So we need > to allow user choose username (and domain) before exploring the server. > Anonymous login should not be default anymore. > - UI-wise there are several possibilities: > 1. Present user the password dialog (with gnome-keyring integration > of course) having an anonymous option there. Check the attachment for > illustration. One way or another this is rather annoying, when browsing > several servers in short time. > 2. Use anonymous login by default (if possible, otherwise show login > dialog) and display cluebar in Nautilus (similar to the one in n-c-b) > allowing user to switch user. > 3. Integrate a menu item somewhere (popup menu over the SMB server > icon) allowing to set/switch user. > - anyway credentials used to browse the server should be used too when > mounting the particular share - but here we have an issue with two > separate gvfs backends having need to communicate between each other. If > possible, I want to avoid code duplication in both backends. > - other thing to care about: don't show any prompt dialogs when having > valid kerberos tickets, but of course allow fallback to password entry > when krb login fails (this is something libsmbclient does > transparently). This is tricky stuff. In general I think doing anon listing by default is right, as this is what most people want and doesn't need to display weird stuff. It also lets us automount smb browsing. However, we should allow uris that specify a name so you can browse for user-specific shares. And we should find some nice way to integrate this into the UI. > Mountspec issues - duplicate mount icons on desktop > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443049 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448008 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443038 > - ok, we're setting real username and domain after successful mount now, > but: > - "gvfs-mount -l" output is wrong, should list URIs containing username > and domain (if set). Now it only returns server/share, while is > naturally possible to have one share mounted under different usernames. > --> modify client/smburi.c > - we have username, domain, server and share parameters available to be > set into mountspec. However username and domain shouldn't be set unless > we really need them. At the moment, non-anonymous mounts have both > username and domain set which confuses Nautilus. > This causes troubles when user gvfs-mount's smb://server/share but > gvfs-ls can't find this location mounted then because it has username > and domain set in mountspec. > - the domain problem: libsmbclient accepts any domain string and still > usually connects to the share. Sometimes even in ADS domain (weird). We > need to detect when domain is really required to be set in order to > connect to a server. Ah, this is related to the ChangLog I noted. I haven't looked into this. Why exactly do we get two mounts. I assume we're accessing the share via two different URIs, but which ones? > "Cannot mount smb share when its subdirs are accessible but its root > not" > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=529277 > - patch needs to be redone. Basically, we always try to mount the share > root which clearly fails here. Caching will need to be modified too. This is really a libsmbclient problem. The stat of the root is just an artificial way to trigger the mount operation. The reporter seems to have some ideas how we could try to work around this. From csaavedra@gnome.org Sun Jun 22 22:13:51 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gvfs-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gvfs-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5413E750158; Sun, 22 Jun 2008 22:13:51 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.445 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.445 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, TW_GV=0.077, TW_JH=0.077] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) (NAT!) (up: 843 hrs), (distance 17, link: GPRS, T1, FreeS/WAN), [200.91.24.6] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2dSxTxu0s0Wu; Sun, 22 Jun 2008 22:13:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from alumnos.utalca.cl (alumnos.utalca.cl [200.91.24.6]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62CF6750093; Sun, 22 Jun 2008 22:13:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [200.83.107.32] (pc-32-107-83-200.cm.vtr.net [200.83.107.32]) (using SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alumnos.utalca.cl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B1AF4B46F; Sun, 22 Jun 2008 18:19:31 -0400 (CLT) Subject: Re: defunct processes in 2.23? From: Claudio Saavedra To: "Jaap A. Haitsma" , gvfs-list@gnome.org In-Reply-To: <8a8adccc0806220223g5ded74den68dcc81100edf735@mail.gmail.com> References: <1214092309.24026.2.camel@localhost> <89b6ba3a0806211800w6d095384tfe9da42199fd3cb5@mail.gmail.com> <8a8adccc0806220223g5ded74den68dcc81100edf735@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 18:13:34 -0400 Message-Id: <1214172814.24026.14.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.23.4 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: desktop-devel-list@gnome.org, Patryk Zawadzki X-BeenThere: gvfs-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussons about the gvfs virtual filesystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 22:13:51 -0000 El dom, 22-06-2008 a las 11:23 +0200, Jaap A. Haitsma escribió: > > What happened was the following. GVFS was somehow compiled with > HAVE_HAL_FAST_INIT equals 1. This meant that > libhal_get_all_devices_with_properties was available. However jhbuild > installls hal 0.5.10 and libhal_get_all_devices_with_properties is > only available in 0.5.11. My ~/.xsession-errors contained an error of > gnome-panel which made a call where > libhal_get_all_devices_with_properties was not found. > > Upgrading to hal 0.5.11 fixed everything for me I did some quick tests and it seems like the checks in GVFS's configure.ac for libhal_get_all_devices_with_properties succeed if you have installed libhal-dev 0.5.11 from your distro. Removing libhal-dev caused gvfs to disable the "fast init path" thing: Use HAL for volume monitor: yes (with fast init path: no) I guess that what happens otherwise, is that gvfs is linked against libhal in /opt/gnome-2.24 (currently 0.5.10), which doesn't have libhal_get_all_devices_with_properties, and then we have the resulting processes dying. I'm not sure how this should be addressed, perhaps the gvfs people should improve the tests for libhal_get_all_devices_with_properties, or we could simply bump the libhal minimal dependency to 0.5.11. I'm cc'ing the gvfs-list. Wisdom is appreciated. Claudio -- Claudio Saavedra From patrys@gmail.com Sun Jun 22 23:26:28 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gvfs-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gvfs-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDCBF7501B8 for ; Sun, 22 Jun 2008 23:26:26 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.445 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.445 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, TW_GV=0.077, TW_JH=0.077] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) (firewall!) (up: 7170 hrs), (distance 13, link: (Google 2)), [209.85.198.228] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YbFQotPoY6nL for ; Sun, 22 Jun 2008 23:26:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.228]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72E277501EF for ; Sun, 22 Jun 2008 23:26:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id f6so7469275rvb.3 for ; Sun, 22 Jun 2008 16:26:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=Lkvuair4Yn38qlx2XDIbvXMGJar6cXozOXBjP6adWNY=; b=DcC9iA8DZ1U1jjhNKoFqdDU4/jpLF5jl91O9brB+AfezIbi9FBRQd75ty06O1m+aj4 RSHTv6QOX3xqjDxU9cpyHCbUzY82MYrCI+tDGVaNVcVhRGvkaI74rqsuHfpAptEnCrcV ZXSvwdcafld+SH6BYIq/aXu7P0E3vF+2F8idk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=Be6YJMh6FVR9w/SW9tQhiBGv1i+Al4g2Ivj3OiL6NOOX1UWPC0ZJ6jwpFPcb02R/uM VNHIJYCgIsnOxCWpRAzSMRV8VP3P7DJmI4lVSQZiGB8ARFjQYyOOfWtjRGMTg5jKFFdk H+60iyGulOeFqdi4S7Dy3eanayZ3URWVuoE1U= Received: by 10.141.44.13 with SMTP id w13mr11689439rvj.13.1214177180031; Sun, 22 Jun 2008 16:26:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.73.7 with HTTP; Sun, 22 Jun 2008 16:26:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <89b6ba3a0806221626q7ee24fadmb1c39916137500db@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 01:26:20 +0200 From: "Patryk Zawadzki" Sender: patrys@gmail.com To: "Claudio Saavedra" Subject: Re: defunct processes in 2.23? In-Reply-To: <1214172814.24026.14.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1214092309.24026.2.camel@localhost> <89b6ba3a0806211800w6d095384tfe9da42199fd3cb5@mail.gmail.com> <8a8adccc0806220223g5ded74den68dcc81100edf735@mail.gmail.com> <1214172814.24026.14.camel@localhost> X-Google-Sender-Auth: bcb5ffff11cfdcde X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 23:40:10 +0000 Cc: "Jaap A. Haitsma" , gvfs-list@gnome.org, desktop-devel-list@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gvfs-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussons about the gvfs virtual filesystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 23:26:28 -0000 On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 12:13 AM, Claudio Saavedra wrote: > I did some quick tests and it seems like the checks in GVFS's > configure.ac for libhal_get_all_devices_with_properties succeed if you > have installed libhal-dev 0.5.11 from your distro. Removing libhal-dev > caused gvfs to disable the "fast init path" thing: > > Use HAL for volume monitor: yes (with fast init path: no) > > I guess that what happens otherwise, is that gvfs is linked against > libhal in /opt/gnome-2.24 (currently 0.5.10), which doesn't have > libhal_get_all_devices_with_properties, and then we have the resulting > processes dying. My system does not have hal 0.5.10 anywhere (I'm using 0.5.11) yet I still get the zombie processes on login. I have 2.23 installed as my main desktop, not via jhbuild or anything else (I package and install GNOME 2.23 rpms as modules get released). -- Patryk Zawadzki PLD Linux Distribution From jaap.haitsma@gmail.com Mon Jun 23 05:53:35 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gvfs-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gvfs-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEF2F7501F6 for ; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 05:53:35 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.445 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.445 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, TW_GV=0.077, TW_JH=0.077] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) (firewall!) (up: 1149 hrs), (distance 13, link: (Google 2)), [209.85.200.175] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KAvGSykJkOTk for ; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 05:53:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.175]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30E907500D7 for ; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 05:53:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 23so1934011wfg.9 for ; Sun, 22 Jun 2008 22:53:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=bOVwtKbP/OL5PPZqQv49SXnYThm0F+VmDl6+U9GfC4Q=; b=FcPBsqIvwS4Q2AhoNZpkwVp4P9yHnjsNgY+UvV/bt2AcLkBb+wtbRFJjnmj4rPWEVq XXXuVTvrcLWevvLzaGbFJ/a70wss+Oo55zpRgtRaqhVLbN2H7LbauyYoqScgFK6FR51m 4F/j5FvBnYbqMJNWRlQyTWMogbTcXD8aFoM20= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=lJcylT1tBJSAjiK3GtNCloV6kTrtYzqB8IVvNN/e522zxihk+n3s2Gznf0LYo0ayXV ZgT1ypWGTO4CdJgLuNEpxrY0sZ69h8f8Vh5mSdtyBxebEPl4Oyc1OQZQpkwb2EeErwzq v4v8cyFWq1HDc45yfUWBTcsoEgIxyWJUVL3qI= Received: by 10.142.215.5 with SMTP id n5mr3229333wfg.131.1214200408547; Sun, 22 Jun 2008 22:53:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.143.49.2 with HTTP; Sun, 22 Jun 2008 22:53:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8a8adccc0806222253t4d373541j606d953637915588@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 07:53:28 +0200 From: "Jaap A. Haitsma" Sender: jaap.haitsma@gmail.com To: "Patryk Zawadzki" Subject: Re: defunct processes in 2.23? In-Reply-To: <89b6ba3a0806221626q7ee24fadmb1c39916137500db@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1214092309.24026.2.camel@localhost> <89b6ba3a0806211800w6d095384tfe9da42199fd3cb5@mail.gmail.com> <8a8adccc0806220223g5ded74den68dcc81100edf735@mail.gmail.com> <1214172814.24026.14.camel@localhost> <89b6ba3a0806221626q7ee24fadmb1c39916137500db@mail.gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 34ce5ab1f52eb112 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 09:18:59 +0000 Cc: gvfs-list@gnome.org, desktop-devel-list@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gvfs-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussons about the gvfs virtual filesystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 05:53:36 -0000 On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 1:26 AM, Patryk Zawadzki wrote: > On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 12:13 AM, Claudio Saavedra wrote: >> I did some quick tests and it seems like the checks in GVFS's >> configure.ac for libhal_get_all_devices_with_properties succeed if you >> have installed libhal-dev 0.5.11 from your distro. Removing libhal-dev >> caused gvfs to disable the "fast init path" thing: >> >> Use HAL for volume monitor: yes (with fast init path: no) >> >> I guess that what happens otherwise, is that gvfs is linked against >> libhal in /opt/gnome-2.24 (currently 0.5.10), which doesn't have >> libhal_get_all_devices_with_properties, and then we have the resulting >> processes dying. > > My system does not have hal 0.5.10 anywhere (I'm using 0.5.11) yet I > still get the zombie processes on login. I have 2.23 installed as my > main desktop, not via jhbuild or anything else (I package and install > GNOME 2.23 rpms as modules get released). > What's in your ~/.xsession-errors file? Jaap From patrys@gmail.com Mon Jun 23 08:05:34 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gvfs-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gvfs-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68D0B750008 for ; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 08:05:34 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.445 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.445 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, TW_JH=0.077, TW_XS=0.077] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) (firewall!) (up: 8743 hrs), (distance 12, link: (Google 2)), [64.233.166.179] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LNVAuPjBzZz2 for ; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 08:05:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.179]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74E62750210 for ; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 08:05:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id a29so957773pyi.36 for ; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 01:05:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=pbfxqA0dP5WC1++iy/tgbBNqxGo0sugxbDVO+waaeh0=; b=o3PZKuyFPTarSwJM2I7eXjmcv7/pMGKa787e7GGzmy/1SsOr1H1srP5fcuGB6AZUiV /iPJTUmE2/2uWn7Q+0CK5ZrnCm/LQdRj8E/rS+QP7hBURxSkWj3hT39TgKE4gnWGYUpS jQHXQlnwzdn1XyLRBh97fflUUQabYgqumJQmA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=hokd7x2K3SxvM94O9xx4HvUwq67DDe1CwXNyPHtWkBH88Ijupvwda7hLa5iDAaYIGF JnR45JJQW1FL9ePXzv5BaIadZ7IYeoYibYH98XrhwAAdc+/p5MJfeyA8s7oQ2wMWf1lX qWT1NhT1LyhPmZLEikbQGqNUXCE+7ZOJNXRQU= Received: by 10.141.63.20 with SMTP id q20mr12252040rvk.258.1214208327176; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 01:05:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.73.7 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 01:05:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <89b6ba3a0806230105g484c9013rcffbde73cefd132c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 10:05:27 +0200 From: "Patryk Zawadzki" Sender: patrys@gmail.com To: "Jaap A. Haitsma" Subject: Re: defunct processes in 2.23? In-Reply-To: <8a8adccc0806222253t4d373541j606d953637915588@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1214092309.24026.2.camel@localhost> <89b6ba3a0806211800w6d095384tfe9da42199fd3cb5@mail.gmail.com> <8a8adccc0806220223g5ded74den68dcc81100edf735@mail.gmail.com> <1214172814.24026.14.camel@localhost> <89b6ba3a0806221626q7ee24fadmb1c39916137500db@mail.gmail.com> <8a8adccc0806222253t4d373541j606d953637915588@mail.gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: d379e5e6e8180242 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 09:18:59 +0000 Cc: gvfs-list@gnome.org, desktop-devel-list@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gvfs-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussons about the gvfs virtual filesystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 08:05:34 -0000 On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 7:53 AM, Jaap A. Haitsma wrote: > On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 1:26 AM, Patryk Zawadzki wrote: >> My system does not have hal 0.5.10 anywhere (I'm using 0.5.11) yet I >> still get the zombie processes on login. I have 2.23 installed as my >> main desktop, not via jhbuild or anything else (I package and install >> GNOME 2.23 rpms as modules get released). > What's in your ~/.xsession-errors file? Already checked that. No errors regarding any of the zombie processes. They seem to all be loaded and launched but when they exit (due to some condition) nothing collects their PIDs: [patrys@purrr SPECS]$ egrep '(gnome-session-splash|gnome-at|gnome-do|gnome-volume|gnome-power|pactl)' /home/users/patrys/.xsession-errors ** (gnome-session:18485): DEBUG: read /home/users/patrys/.config/autostart/gnome-do.desktop ** (gnome-session:18485): DEBUG: read /usr/share/gnome/autostart/gnome-volume-manager.desktop ** (gnome-session:18485): DEBUG: read /usr/share/gnome/autostart/gnome-power-manager.desktop ** (gnome-session:18485): DEBUG: read /usr/share/gnome/autostart/gnome-session-splash.desktop ** (gnome-session:18485): DEBUG: read /etc/xdg/autostart/gnome-at-session.desktop ** (gnome-session:18485): DEBUG: Program = 'gnome-session-splash' ** (gnome-session:18485): DEBUG: CloneCommand = 'gnome-session-splash' ** (gnome-session:18485): DEBUG: RestartCommand = 'gnome-session-splash' '--sm-client-id' '103e75381846dc4a112137984206096300000184850016' /usr/bin/gnome-at-visual[90]: getopts: arguments changed since last call ** (gnome-session:18485): DEBUG: IceProcessMessagesIOError on '0x8584e60 [gnome-session-splash 103e75381846dc4a112137984206096300000184850016]' ** (gnome-session:18485): DEBUG: xsmp_finalize (0x8584e60 [gnome-session-splash 103e75381846dc4a112137984206096300000184850016]) ** (gnome-session:18485): DEBUG: Program = 'gnome-power-manager' ** (gnome-session:18485): DEBUG: Set properties from client '0x8584d80 [gnome-power-manager 103e75381846dc4a1121379842083378100000184850029]' ** (gnome-session:18485): DEBUG: CloneCommand = 'gnome-power-manager' ** (gnome-session:18485): DEBUG: Set properties from client '0x8584d80 [gnome-power-manager 103e75381846dc4a1121379842083378100000184850029]' ** (gnome-session:18485): DEBUG: RestartCommand = 'gnome-power-manager' '--sm-client-id' '103e75381846dc4a1121379842083378100000184850029' '--screen' '0' ** (gnome-session:18485): DEBUG: Set properties from client '0x8584d80 [gnome-power-manager 103e75381846dc4a1121379842083378100000184850029]' ** (gnome-session:18485): DEBUG: Client '0x8584d80 [gnome-power-manager 103e75381846dc4a1121379842083378100000184850029]' received SaveYourselfDone(success = True) /home/users/patrys/.local/share/gnome-do/plugins [Info 16:13:42.182] Searching for plugins in directory /usr/local/share/gnome-do/plugins [Warn 16:13:42.182] Could not read plugins directory /usr/local/share/gnome-do/plugins: Directory '/usr/local/share/gnome-do/plugins' not found. [Info 16:13:42.182] Searching for plugins in directory /usr/share/gnome-do/plugins [Info 16:13:42.182] Searching for plugins in directory /usr/share/gdm/gnome-do/plugins [Warn 16:13:42.183] Could not read plugins directory /usr/share/gdm/gnome-do/plugins: Directory '/usr/share/gdm/gnome-do/plugins' not found. '/apps/gnome-do/preferences/key_binding'. You may change this -- Patryk Zawadzki PLD Linux Distribution From shiyee@shiyee.dk Mon Jun 23 15:33:01 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gvfs-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gvfs-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8C96750030 for ; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:33:01 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) (up: 6312 hrs), (distance 24, link: ethernet/modem), [130.225.194.6] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u91M-LZqe+x5 for ; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:32:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.cs.aau.dk (smtp.cs.aau.dk [130.225.194.6]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F25575007A for ; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:32:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.1.15] (0x503e955d.abnxx4.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk [80.62.149.93]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.cs.aau.dk (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m5NFWSLf000854 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 17:32:32 +0200 Subject: Python bindings From: "Mads Chr. Olesen" To: gvfs-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain Organization: shiyee.dk Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 17:32:32 +0200 Message-Id: <1214235152.7284.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.62 on 130.225.194.6 X-BeenThere: gvfs-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussons about the gvfs virtual filesystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:33:02 -0000 Hi there! Is there an estimate on when Python bindings for gvfs/gio will be available? Is there any code available in a repository somewhere? Anything I can do to help with the progress? -- Mads Chr. Olesen shiyee.dk From hadess@hadess.net Mon Jun 23 15:35:39 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gvfs-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gvfs-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DFAA7500F1 for ; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:35:39 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.815 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.815 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-1.616, BAYES_50=0.001, L_P0F_UNKN=0.8] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: UNKNOWN [S4:47:1:60:M1460,S,T,N,W3:.:?:?] (up: 1741 hrs), (link: ethernet/modem), [195.10.223.155] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aVxdbNrTtssv for ; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:35:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from bungle.evilgeniuses.org.uk (bungle.evilgeniuses.org.uk [195.10.223.155]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38AD7750077 for ; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:35:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.1.7] (cpc4-glfd1-0-0-cust751.glfd.cable.ntl.com [86.16.126.240]) by bungle.evilgeniuses.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ADE91C3BAC7; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:35:30 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: Python bindings From: Bastien Nocera To: "Mads Chr. Olesen" In-Reply-To: <1214235152.7284.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1214235152.7284.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:35:29 +0100 Message-Id: <1214235329.3133.43.camel@cookie.hadess.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.2 (2.22.2-2.fc9) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: gvfs-list@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gvfs-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussons about the gvfs virtual filesystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:35:39 -0000 On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 17:32 +0200, Mads Chr. Olesen wrote: > Hi there! > > Is there an estimate on when Python bindings for gvfs/gio will be > available? > > Is there any code available in a repository somewhere? > > Anything I can do to help with the progress? They're in pygobject SVN trunk. Cheers From psmith@gnu.org Mon Jun 23 23:52:36 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gvfs-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gvfs-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F6FE7501C4 for ; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 23:52:36 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.11 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.11 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_05=-1.11] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) (up: 1100 hrs), (distance 21, link: ethernet/modem), [67.222.39.28] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3sqCdi-gIf9Y for ; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 23:52:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from outbound-mail-138.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-138.bluehost.com [67.222.39.28]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2D15575019F for ; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 23:52:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: (qmail 14455 invoked by uid 0); 23 Jun 2008 23:52:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box138.bluehost.com) (69.89.22.138) by outboundproxy4.bluehost.com with SMTP; 23 Jun 2008 23:52:23 -0000 Received: from c-76-24-201-97.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([76.24.201.97] helo=[192.168.1.100]) by box138.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (SSLv3:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1KAvpf-0000ix-GP for gvfs-list@gnome.org; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 17:52:23 -0600 Subject: gvfsd-trash inappropriately searching for .Trash in autofs mount directories From: Paul Smith To: gvfs-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain Organization: GNU's Not UNIX! Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 19:52:24 -0400 Message-Id: <1214265144.19680.74.camel@psmith-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Identified-User: {678:box138.bluehost.com:madscie1:mad-scientist.us} {sentby:smtp auth 76.24.201.97 authed with paul+mad-scientist.us} DomainKey-Status: no signature X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 00:06:13 +0000 X-BeenThere: gvfs-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list Reply-To: psmith@gnu.org List-Id: Discussons about the gvfs virtual filesystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 23:52:36 -0000 Hi all; Please consider applying the patch contained in http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=525779 at least as a short-term fix for the real problem, which is that there are a number of filesystem types where searching for .Trash is wholly inappropriate (consider sysfs, or proc, or devpts). For most of these an extra lookup is not that big a deal: you just get back an ENOENT. But for autofs, it can really be a major problem. If no one has time to implement a more generic solution involving, I would suppose, a gconf value containing a list of filesystem types to be ignore, then please apply this patch so at least we ignore the egregiously incorrect, and user-visible, lookups. Cheers! From hpj@novell.com Mon Jun 30 03:41:58 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gvfs-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gvfs-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A71475007A; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 03:41:58 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.4-2.6 (up: 1726 hrs), (distance 25, link: ethernet/modem), [195.135.221.2] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PPL-ks8Cui5V; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 03:41:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from emea5-mh.id5.novell.com (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.221.2]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2FB17500BF; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 03:41:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [10.0.0.21] ([149.44.162.75]) by emea5-mh.id5.novell.com with ESMTP (TLS encrypted); Mon, 30 Jun 2008 05:41:37 +0200 Subject: Announce: GVFS 0.2.5 (stable) From: Hans Petter Jansson To: gnome-announce-list@gnome.org, gvfs-list Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Novell, Inc. Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 22:40:52 -0500 Message-Id: <1214797252.12775.20.camel@kzerza.site> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.1.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: gvfs-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list Reply-To: hpj@novell.com List-Id: Discussons about the gvfs virtual filesystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 03:41:58 -0000 Version 0.2.5 of GVFS, GNOME's virtual file system layer, is out. This is a stable release with two important bug fixes. Download location ================= http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/gvfs/0.2/ Changes since GVFS 0.2.4 ======================== * Fix unremovable files in trash (#523139, Andreas Henriksson and A. Walton). * Fix recursive copy of directories (#522933, Tomas Bzatek). -- Hans Petter