From n-O76rKlMXCKdksQbsTWT90rBZa27m-mkNL3A5jgLthVO2-4q0kTcLBtvj@bounce.linkedin.com Mon Oct 4 10:09:52 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35EC87504A8 for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 10:09:52 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -9.208 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.208 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_RP_CERTIFIED=-3, RCVD_IN_RP_SAFE=-2, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y9ypDlnR7z4Z for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 10:09:50 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: delayed 775 seconds by postgrey-1.32 at menubar.gnome.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 10:09:47 UTC Received: from mail16-d-ag.linkedin.com (mail16-d-ag.linkedin.com [208.111.169.165]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 990F7750715 for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 10:09:39 +0000 (UTC) DomainKey-Signature: s=prod; d=linkedin.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=Sender:Date:From:To:Message-ID:Subject:MIME-Version: Content-Type:X-LinkedIn-Template:X-LinkedIn-Class: X-LinkedIn-fbl; b=sckppctQcsqZrYwdvgJLNlTlqrfnnMo5eCQNe1tFwB+ArKE5QKfP5xEO drL2t5ife+jAou8a6okbC8oCKMdlxzMZ64tkV3HouIK8FY5l1Tn+IkaFF UvF3V8MCuOYry03; Sender: messages-noreply@bounce.linkedin.com Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 02:56:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Qiang Zhang To: Message-ID: <919097517.3084922.1286186202635.JavaMail.app@ech3-cdn07.prod> Subject: Qiang Zhang wants to stay in touch on LinkedIn MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_3084921_591900003.1286186202634" X-LinkedIn-Template: invite_guest_no_pymk_control_59 X-LinkedIn-Class: INVITE-GUEST X-LinkedIn-fbl: n-O76rKlMXCKdksQbsTWT90rBZa27m-mkNL3A5jgLthVO2-4q0kTcLBtvj X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2010 10:09:52 -0000 ------=_Part_3084921_591900003.1286186202634 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit LinkedIn ------------ I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn. - Qiang Zhang Qiang Zhang SSG-OTC at Intel China Confirm that you know Qiang Zhang https://www.linkedin.com/e/se6zmp-gev621hl-6z/isd/1740373023/_OZNB-SF/ -- (c) 2010, LinkedIn Corporation ------=_Part_3084921_591900003.1286186202634 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

LinkedIn

I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn.

- Qiang Zhang

Qiang Zhang
SSG-OTC at Intel
China

Confirm that you know Qiang

© 2010, LinkedIn Corporation

------=_Part_3084921_591900003.1286186202634-- From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Mon Oct 4 21:26:58 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91E2075041E; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 21:26:58 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.593 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.593 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, TW_BG=0.077, TW_GD=0.077, TW_GT=0.077, TW_KB=0.077] autolearn=no Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0tVlo4+Exhao; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 21:26:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.194]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65D357500C5; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 21:26:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.11] (211.Red-80-59-90.staticIP.rima-tde.net [80.59.90.211]) by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrus4) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0Lfkck-1OMj7I2pb8-00oePm; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 17:26:46 -0400 Subject: gnome-settings-daemon 2.91.0 released From: Rodrigo Moya To: gnome-announce-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2010 23:26:42 +0200 Message-ID: <1286227602.5420.2.camel@megeve> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:mKlCNA4ktsMxQE+2yvFmuS0kj1GFJ86mg1xNbvps3Ep tB0pfLR4Y72CvaSTuVLtToZ/rw5H+hCv88UzHfIsDgxuZM8jOd +37/xMR4eemZgTYjlJ8bwYQN0BFA+wGvN6yWbAlTxLO+8Oiuab r+EXFRo28tcJxatUSY3DkC97ql4yg5DM//5ZaGBSYBWCw4wjor rCdYGk/Ucak53Biqzc3K0onUjt0m9+oCqeYMPrTdVo= Cc: Control Center List X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2010 21:26:58 -0000 Changes since 2.90.1 -------------------- - Give a name to the keyboard status icon (Matthias Clasen) (#610319) - Fix include directory to match API version (Bastien Nocera) - Add daemon path to pkg-config files (Bastien Nocera) - Don't switch mouse buttons for XTest devices (Bastien Nocera) (#627084) - Remove GtkObject usage (Matthias Clasen) (#630678) - Use gtk3 draw event instead of expose-event (William Jon McCann) (#630975= ) - Use gdk-pixbuf header (William Jon McCann) (#630975) - Don't use GdkColormap (William Jon McCann) - Use cairo regions to set input shape (William Jon McCann) - Adapt to GnomeBG API changes (William Jon McCann) - Use an empty region to ignore events (William Jon McCann) - Don't destroy the cairo context in draw handler (William Jon McCann) - Adapt to libgnomekbd API changes (Sergey V. Udaltsov) - Translations: - ar (Khaled Hosny) - bg (Damyan Ivanov) - ca (Joan Duran) - cz (Petr Kovar) - gl (Fran Di=E9guez) Availability ------------ http://download.gnome.org/sources/gnome-settings-daemon/2.91/ Contact ------- * Bugs in http://bugzilla.gnome.org * Mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomecc-list From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Tue Oct 5 08:45:18 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E452750284; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 08:45:18 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.747 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.747 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, TW_BG=0.077, TW_KB=0.077] autolearn=no Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L6+CV2ZlnslN; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 08:45:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.194]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FA9F750258; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 08:45:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.11] (211.Red-80-59-90.staticIP.rima-tde.net [80.59.90.211]) by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrus3) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MSN8d-1P9HUz2jz1-00Tcu7; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 04:44:57 -0400 Subject: gnome-control-center 2.91.0 released From: Rodrigo Moya To: gnome-announce-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 10:44:55 +0200 Message-ID: <1286268295.17078.16.camel@megeve> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:igH/y/sKGMOrDXBa/wKPUEXouFjxiH6OrlYaI5iQcCw 7dK4D1Foj1WoSmdq2bFsYg2T4+ps/o4mK5ar3Ca74zxU12gJob pHh1fTMGjsjCsX1Pt3kSYg3aBvbg/DE529gvI7TuqViMVLjDBT GgDCV6QXOGS66I4mbNDZG5/8OPzjoGkqxAtkrs155L65zPAuuM Up2HXlePcEEQ7zqNm0mDk4AG8JgZZTRp33xUMtMbLQ= Cc: Control Center List X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 08:45:18 -0000 Changes since 2.90.1 -------------------- Common: - Remove unneeded dependency check for XCursor (Bastien Nocera) - Adapt to GtkObject removal in GTK3 (Javier Jard=F3n) - Use gtk_widget_get_preferred_size() instead gtk_size_request_get_size() (= Javier Jard=F3n) - Use upstream gettext insstead the Glib one (Javier Jard=F3n) - Update autotools configuration (Javier Jard=F3n) Background: - Come up with 'Wallpapers' selected and displayed (Kalev Lember) (#630417) Datetime: - Add required includes to tz.h (Bastien Nocera) - Add test application for missing TZ pixmaps (Bastien Nocera) (#630261) - Fix automake warning (Bastien Nocera) Default applications: - Remove Opera from default browser choices (Bastien Nocera) (#627733) Keyboard: - Updated for the latest libgnomekbd API (Sergey V. Udaltsov) Mouse: - Rename to "Mouse and Touchpad" (Bastien Nocera) - Remove unneeded XCursor include (Bastien Nocera) Shell: - Make search entry single-iconed (Bastien Nocera) - Show settings without a panel in Other (Bastien Nocera) (#630998) - Drop font viewer (William Jon McCann) - Wait until the toplevel is realized before using it (William Jon McCann) = (#631051) - Update for new GTK3 drawing APIs (William Jon McCann) - Fix .desktop file to work correctly in gnome-shell (William Jon McCann) Universal access: - Fix desktop file (Bastien Nocera) Translations: - ca (Joan Duran) - cz (Petr Kovar) - eu (Inaki Larranaga Murgoitio) - ro (Lucian Adrian Grijincu) Availability ------------ http://download.gnome.org/sources/gnome-control-center/2.91/ Contact ------- * Bugs in http://bugzilla.gnome.org * Mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomecc-list From sergey.udaltsov@gmail.com Wed Oct 6 13:43:51 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 529357502B6 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 13:43:51 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rZdfe1OQANh3 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 13:43:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qy0-f175.google.com (mail-qy0-f175.google.com [209.85.216.175]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32FB47502AC for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 13:43:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk30 with SMTP id 30so129278qyk.6 for ; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 06:43:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:received:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Bmb4UiAfn2NGxx6vRpf1oKgfXbQu1jgADDjxLMQDn4w=; b=v+9Qt+f/7Bow2cjIVmSmzmM3ekNTWHAd3CHWT2xt5XoVPoyd6LQUuKg9gNpeIn1xya oCdXfyeQJneZo0QTWBYJ47VoYH3JkBkRqMcYTM9wxlHBFbA70fr98eifhGQl3J7pAwTe Wbcy0AXTxVEhFQ17ypW4EKS7+PmLB3ZUnTJIE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=Yq3Mcd3hz2uNwilXmYY+EezPEpg6LFdXXikH0PpH28FI6O08qFnZ2IFqwdWu6XLIC9 oHH+cF5vHADRSZAkIfqrpDxW3K6Z3+FYSXSC/dp0tRKfh17Fiqqo7AB677gI3Lb9AZwe s85banS8/YCijesvSWxI3tgbUA7KPqycpR6FQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.19.205 with SMTP id c13mr9565159qab.111.1286372617154; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 06:43:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.212.19 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 06:43:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.212.19 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 06:43:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 14:43:37 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Gconf2gsettings From: Sergey Udaltsov To: Control Center List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00151748dbc2e4f14f0491f2f6bc X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 13:43:51 -0000 --00151748dbc2e4f14f0491f2f6bc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi folks Is there a plan of actions for moving gcc and gsd from gconf to gsettings? Are we doing that adhoc, on case by case basis? Cheers, Sergey --00151748dbc2e4f14f0491f2f6bc Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

Hi folks

Is there a plan of actions for moving gcc and gsd from gconf to gsettings? Are we doing that adhoc, on case by case basis?

Cheers,

Sergey

--00151748dbc2e4f14f0491f2f6bc-- From hadess@hadess.net Wed Oct 6 13:55:45 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4C6C750330 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 13:55:45 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.6 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5sQMN-97wYM0 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 13:55:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay1-d.mail.gandi.net (relay1-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.193]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45B507502AC for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 13:55:34 +0000 (UTC) X-Originating-IP: 217.70.178.37 Received: from mfilter3-v.gandi.net (mfilter3-v.gandi.net [217.70.178.37]) by relay1-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ADFA2552FE; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 15:55:32 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter3-v.gandi.net Received: from relay1-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.193]) by mfilter3-v.gandi.net (mfilter3-v.gandi.net [217.70.178.37]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FCRaPeEDgYiR; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 15:55:32 +0200 (CEST) X-Originating-IP: 80.4.117.127 Received: from [192.168.1.140] (cpc6-glfd5-2-0-cust126.6-2.cable.virginmedia.com [80.4.117.127]) (Authenticated sender: hadess@hadess.net) by relay1-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A5B842552FB; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 15:55:30 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: Gconf2gsettings From: Bastien Nocera To: Sergey Udaltsov In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 14:55:30 +0100 Message-ID: <1286373330.29773.54.camel@cookie.hadess.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.31.90 (2.31.90-1.fc14) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Control Center List X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 13:55:46 -0000 On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 14:43 +0100, Sergey Udaltsov wrote: > Hi folks > > Is there a plan of actions for moving gcc and gsd from gconf to > gsettings? Are we doing that adhoc, on case by case basis? Rodrigo has already started on that. Cheers From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Wed Oct 6 16:56:52 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5535275017D for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 16:56:52 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.901 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oTalmzmQziqc for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 16:56:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.194]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CEAA75006C for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 16:56:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.11] (211.Red-80-59-90.staticIP.rima-tde.net [80.59.90.211]) by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrus2) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LbuTk-1OKGvM2CZA-00jD5x; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 12:56:37 -0400 Subject: Re: Gconf2gsettings From: Rodrigo Moya To: Bastien Nocera In-Reply-To: <1286373330.29773.54.camel@cookie.hadess.net> References: <1286373330.29773.54.camel@cookie.hadess.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 18:56:38 +0200 Message-ID: <1286384198.5569.5.camel@megeve> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:jXbXzMkW/wOJjL5kL7rwlF190ayq+OiW5CCKgHAK5TI kh3Le8y1OhqvQSFXg8EmSUDsmWN46Kdmrv7yt1qhUQf/LL/xPG Iugu929RmSKOfANcUy9vFMVmnJLOzrIkLnnd4S//NWkVP3D06B gSs2ieoeAqO/07YeaN0NVpNYfwsBabq2uCyKuN/Mtq7dzoblH/ zoH1I2OhK5x2uJYMlwDW2mClNzFfdt+g1m3S27AAVY= Cc: Sergey Udaltsov , Control Center List X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 16:56:52 -0000 On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 14:55 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 14:43 +0100, Sergey Udaltsov wrote: > > Hi folks > > > > Is there a plan of actions for moving gcc and gsd from gconf to > > gsettings? Are we doing that adhoc, on case by case basis? > > Rodrigo has already started on that. > yes, already done (not pushed yet) with phase I, which is to use GSettings for all schemas defined in g-s-d. Next thing will be using GSettings for those in g-c-c, and finally, go 1 by one over the other settings we use and migrate in sync with the owner of the schemas or remove them if they no longer apply (like the Nautilus settings, right?) Will push it today, unless Bastien finds something too bad in my patch From william.jon.mccann@gmail.com Thu Oct 7 21:26:59 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B498B7502F9 for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2010 21:26:59 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rrPiRmryFayG for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2010 21:26:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0161750339 for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2010 21:26:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz6 with SMTP id 6so380477bwz.27 for ; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 14:26:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=EtaEYwmLLt6AFX80h42QQX0k66B7vaWrDT7vnTP/9ow=; b=RbOqdB2F7xq+235VD1VYVQQVcCPURJo1zvinDAl75tfqiWNABACY4Ga6awdIIhXyW3 hDoU/itByWss1vNeH2PFuhDsZFz6zay5QX1cVR4F84wJWZivMzZkHVv1SbCpMJ7piZea S1GAma2/5DFEHDJ4mi0gSr8X8flK0cLJ9QzHY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=L18jLMWZIU6SuFwISoVBqKGqi0Z3Jaz3z3oVKBnTYbI7zFKRM4gq5SS3tKABCOOgkC mw1IzSi7/pDE6v24mKxzYzbuof2beydRnV+3kd6uUix6IgdsALxHaMF3EBOTj+tdr7z/ zQmZ+dJFt9uy0ieGrhKIAp9yiYKr3BJTP0puA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.68.206 with SMTP id w14mr1128437bki.212.1286486805023; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 14:26:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.55.69 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Oct 2010 14:26:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 17:26:45 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Typing break From: William Jon McCann To: Control Center List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 21:27:00 -0000 Heya, I think it makes sense to remove the typing break feature from the control center for 3.0. Reasons include: * It has never really been designed in a session holistic way - poor interactions with the screen lock and power management. * Doesn't really currently make sense in the 3.0 shell - due to lack of status icons, etc * It isn't used by (or required by) enough people to warrant inclusion in the core * It is probably more useful as an app * Things like workrave are fine * At some later point we can redesign it as a plugin of some kind that works well with the shell (once we have a design for it) I'm planning to remove it but I was asked to post here first. Hopefully this doesn't turn into lots of bikeshedding :/ So, let's do it this way... if you want to keep the feature you come up with a design for how it works in the new system settings and in the 3.0 shell (with appropriate fallbacks to the 2.x shell). And if the proposal makes sense we'll add it back. Jon From sergey.udaltsov@gmail.com Sat Oct 9 18:33:23 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41B9575013E for ; Sat, 9 Oct 2010 18:33:23 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.99 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.99 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL=0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AEWI-MzsmUWH for ; Sat, 9 Oct 2010 18:33:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qy0-f175.google.com (mail-qy0-f175.google.com [209.85.216.175]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BCE9750132 for ; Sat, 9 Oct 2010 18:33:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk30 with SMTP id 30so1209229qyk.6 for ; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 11:33:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=TkIHYNVYvsfe8wdOd15oIWbpVaMFSTEdSftQnCb2Sto=; b=XswEP63I45ItpvL0P1ff1JIE/wmRvdphqnyoHr1VqwnGUYXG3rDRXmjOFj9PYAWXUu D7FHVg+HaB6cmPpBapFkrV+WChFpAU7J+yZi/xQqbi5ToYuOl3IIc/J87FUp4khZcsa9 +gbJ5LHl0M2ArOmeNENtDtlVJq27Ur79cAXEM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=IIqV5X5SKRYbK+gp75tKr7vEAUUqGTqoPj6vNxYviY4ws1jbGoqsgW1HQ2aR0rRHqN XmQcUYIKET9+iq4xr9Uk9Phw9YALWlxsQkhn4bMkavbXyqC6ULDk1JUpEBRJGnrlpBaD NF1h2RKkWJ251gkkykuZywoht8GIQePrA0aCc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.66.9 with SMTP id l9mr2865081qai.242.1286649180980; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 11:33:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.212.19 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Oct 2010 11:33:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2010 19:33:00 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Typing break From: Sergey Udaltsov To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2010 18:33:23 -0000 > I think it makes sense to remove the typing break feature from the > control center for 3.0. =C2=A0Reasons include: There's just one thing - you forgot to remove it from DIST_SUBDIRS in Makefile.am. Fixed. Cheers, Sergey From sergey.udaltsov@gmail.com Sat Oct 9 18:34:25 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A22275013E for ; Sat, 9 Oct 2010 18:34:25 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.99 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.99 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL=0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6btOjYKCCyPX for ; Sat, 9 Oct 2010 18:34:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qy0-f175.google.com (mail-qy0-f175.google.com [209.85.216.175]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E989750132 for ; Sat, 9 Oct 2010 18:34:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk30 with SMTP id 30so1209920qyk.6 for ; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 11:34:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=FECDDQD9RbpZKItBhuXebjBk2VIb6pbzgUmfFvDlgG0=; b=nZWSRdENNROYwtTXjuXFaIjrtZ0UQHuYwUT4DOxFVZOskwMOQXx89Xx+1EyesAJs4Y i7ayXvFwHDlxrAwkSU4SGUlLi+SG/BqGLuiIlmYEFF4/FN6jDvPkpkC6FMlijHkcPNZJ ygBqJ4WTmVgL+hjZoyuVBQlA4U0bQdaVOjVgA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=Kye48IFvevMXvGykLc3aJxYsmIPqRpIIe2ZtZkwy7kKHyGpbj7r+lIIwl92gY0KU6S /crOYZK6EJDPZP3dfnUWlt7SpiH0Gc4SOvr+PGZGP0bnXIVtSIT6X0ogbBiqiGXCt5eu V6zuQBw1YtvOhTXVmQ+Yl4v1C+ek8fPcj7tb0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.214.210 with SMTP id hb18mr3430745qcb.68.1286649253032; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 11:34:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.212.19 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Oct 2010 11:34:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2010 19:34:12 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Gconf2gsettings From: Sergey Udaltsov To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2010 18:34:25 -0000 What's the replacement for gconf-property-editor, now that we are dropping gconf? Cheers, Sergey From hadess@hadess.net Sat Oct 9 18:46:48 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1A6175013E for ; Sat, 9 Oct 2010 18:46:48 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GPyyPd+NLY94 for ; Sat, 9 Oct 2010 18:46:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slow3-v.mail.gandi.net (slow3-v.mail.gandi.net [217.70.178.89]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68DD0750132 for ; Sat, 9 Oct 2010 18:46:37 +0000 (UTC) X-WhiteListed: mail was accepted with no delay X-WhiteListed: mail was accepted with no delay Received: from relay4-v.mail.gandi.net (relay4-v.mail.gandi.net [217.70.178.78]) by slow3-v.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CFA1862E7 for ; Sat, 9 Oct 2010 20:46:24 +0200 (CEST) X-Originating-IP: 217.70.178.38 Received: from mfilter7-d.gandi.net (mfilter7-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.38]) by relay4-v.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 731CFBA81; Sat, 9 Oct 2010 20:46:13 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at debian.mgt.gandi.net Received: from relay4-v.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.78]) by mfilter7-d.gandi.net (mfilter7-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.38]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H+fMa1jGZnZu; Sat, 9 Oct 2010 20:46:13 +0200 (CEST) X-Originating-IP: 80.4.117.127 Received: from [192.168.1.140] (cpc6-glfd5-2-0-cust126.6-2.cable.virginmedia.com [80.4.117.127]) (Authenticated sender: hadess@hadess.net) by relay4-v.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7DC3ABA82; Sat, 9 Oct 2010 20:46:11 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: Gconf2gsettings From: Bastien Nocera To: Sergey Udaltsov In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2010 19:46:10 +0100 Message-ID: <1286649970.10382.29.camel@cookie.hadess.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.31.90 (2.31.90-1.fc14) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2010 18:46:49 -0000 On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 19:34 +0100, Sergey Udaltsov wrote: > What's the replacement for gconf-property-editor, now that we are > dropping gconf? As mentioned by Matthias on IRC, g_settings_bind() should cover most use cases, except for combo boxes, but Rodrigo is discussing this with Ryan. Cheers From sergey.udaltsov@gmail.com Sun Oct 10 18:41:10 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F6E07500AA for ; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 18:41:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zr5UVZIZI9p5 for ; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 18:41:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A227F7500A7 for ; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 18:40:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk35 with SMTP id 35so3355389qyk.6 for ; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 11:40:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Riauh/VVygMRxbsvcutkqVKKSJiYRpMp727WxrqEN5g=; b=u1ljezSjPve6XATI/lunbAjfY8Kf5+DCexlIWIWG95TcXA8v1BzWG4EKEQGmR93sB/ 2l/ugMRUP2ii0ScYg3JjgyYGHR+0NJeZIC6zJGo0TbFfPXFg1nvFBVURra1ax2nsn5VG BdndSgGTIqG3bnrvPygiT+ozbIqvedG4UEm10= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=UYcdrSf7X8MxXN63oOvtU+hpeP6whFGklMh/hjebz2rXn4yCw94VwqKuK107HVRyHu rhp98P3LB6+fCNhoxoaHKsyTW2mHI7D++6XQ8pxhjwPMDX7YlWPUgLzDNahvHoy6BYd+ ZZZff72WfMX8aFbPCpupJBjlNxMBQjvxOhL9Q= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.184.149 with SMTP id ck21mr4268673qcb.198.1286736057665; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 11:40:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.212.19 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 11:40:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 19:40:57 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: g-s-d, gnome3: coexisting with gnome2 From: Sergey Udaltsov To: Control Center List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 18:41:10 -0000 Hi folks Do we plan for peaceful coexisting of g-s-d/gnome3 with g-s-d/gnome2? That involves coexisting in the filesystem (as separate packages) and running (if possible, would be nice) in parallel. Did I miss any discussions on the subject? Regards, Sergey From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Mon Oct 11 13:34:26 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D3B87500F9 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 13:34:26 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.901 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pf8Me4k0kC4Q for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 13:34:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.194]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54F277500E3 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 13:34:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.11] (211.Red-80-59-90.staticIP.rima-tde.net [80.59.90.211]) by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrus2) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MQzlG-1PGxcl0jqY-00UQUD; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 09:34:12 -0400 Subject: Re: Gconf2gsettings From: Rodrigo Moya To: Sergey Udaltsov In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 15:34:05 +0200 Message-ID: <1286804045.2787.7.camel@megeve> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:hF7sf4zGuWUFW5FUY50ebXgf/1kmgjV5cu7pGuux3N+ 0HSs+UuJs45bGV7M+cB0UELVOzNW3rXLZtmJARLaU9/tL6ZQaL 8GB3YUQG5lgvw+OWN5W1gJSDadzoFV7mbC5S1lFSQldeGtu9GY dRulrpw1EhZti1NE6wDyRC3/BzcbNeTe8xXAdGVHmxK6jS0jFp q5P5ZPXdmXnBNgylZ+/+rzhu6JdnciZhyJn/hndVSI= Cc: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 13:34:26 -0000 On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 19:34 +0100, Sergey Udaltsov wrote: > What's the replacement for gconf-property-editor, now that we are > dropping gconf? > I started writing a CcSettingEditor widget, which you can find in g-c-c master. After having looked at most of the panels, not sure if it would be too helpful, so maybe we just want to use g_settings_bind in each panel, without a generic widget like the one I was writing From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Mon Oct 11 13:51:20 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 241E1750111 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 13:51:20 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.901 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LTMkjWJBMaiW for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 13:51:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.195]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BF117500E3 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 13:51:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.11] (211.Red-80-59-90.staticIP.rima-tde.net [80.59.90.211]) by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrus2) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LeeIQ-1OLoQj0h4Q-00qMeO; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 09:51:06 -0400 Subject: Re: g-s-d, gnome3: coexisting with gnome2 From: Rodrigo Moya To: Sergey Udaltsov In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 15:50:59 +0200 Message-ID: <1286805059.2787.9.camel@megeve> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:Iaq0opzEWRwFGe+Xq58szRlHwTDMhK9ZbNFJs8L8V0M pkysOVt2BkMnmE9NtFd5SjbCuB87hb6e7qxBSga9Ltwp9UcKPh 04wnK10gxao0li636e1iMUJgy3QZ/TM/JlV4IR3oCZBYQwC2X1 8XRK0//qHVj2pXoZamNs7XbxRNr8AUN8CaBId8g903NLSRLJTf TK6fCUFVjwNBNqWuKUEXyUPyZ5JsKEYYrJ+BOP2Kv8= Cc: Control Center List X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 13:51:20 -0000 On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 19:40 +0100, Sergey Udaltsov wrote: > Hi folks > > Do we plan for peaceful coexisting of g-s-d/gnome3 with g-s-d/gnome2? > That involves coexisting in the filesystem (as separate packages) and > running (if possible, would be nice) in parallel. Did I miss any > discussions on the subject? > most of the gsettings / gconf stuff will not work at all in gnome3, since the other modules that depend/use those settings would need to run a version synced with g-s-d, so maybe it's just too messy? We can though install in separate prefixes/binary names From matthias.clasen@gmail.com Mon Oct 11 21:06:41 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B75D750145 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 21:06:41 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xYn0fmDXaj0K for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 21:06:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ww0-f42.google.com (mail-ww0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55191750113 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 21:06:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwb34 with SMTP id 34so452751wwb.3 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 14:06:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=MGCAw5n69t8ArJQtBbCdWxV8o3dC12hemF73irC3HaI=; b=l6Jfm0Z6Ic2gQ12mhtFlCxfI5DKSUIHiMDeem6dE9HKdQWZabHdo8bCy3hMKp9GHfn x/11hU4SikhGOX/32ND7cdp77TKKMpbvOKT66Fm3n//7OyZo4RLMHnYQGJKcQIwC3Ep7 cKHVzqV/q5wU2B761OHObTFQRBd082ZUwY8Og= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=A0ugU6auZKEO+92cbNuSV/iG4dnMv5jH269wkWIorGJyazz86w49YTxzHB0o+KBXJ6 5j8mRkypK7Vp/79pBKmSM5MkJDzx6b1jSm/b4Lp5YueF/hfj1JTmLPcNRjUCZ+74QL+C IvwJ+Y7q/q4TL5Bw1ocIqZUQO8YPlVoOmWyuM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.157.198 with SMTP id c6mr5902677wbx.144.1286831180946; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 14:06:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.155.68 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 14:06:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 17:06:20 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: g-s-d, gnome3: coexisting with gnome2 From: Matthias Clasen To: Sergey Udaltsov Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Control Center List X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 21:06:41 -0000 On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Sergey Udaltsov wrote: > Hi folks > > Do we plan for peaceful coexisting of g-s-d/gnome3 with g-s-d/gnome2? > That involves coexisting in the filesystem (as separate packages) and > running (if possible, would be nice) in parallel. Did I miss any > discussions on the subject? It doesn't make much sense to have a gnome2 g-s-d in parallel to a gnome3 g-s-d. There can only be one in your session, and they are using different backing stores. We don't aim for fully parallel-installable gnome2 and gnome3. What we will have is a 'fallback shell' consisting of a number of gnome2 components (panel + metacity, mainly), but they will run in a gnome3 environment. From matthias.clasen@gmail.com Fri Oct 15 14:50:02 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnomecc-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C7F07500A7 for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 14:50:02 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.923 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.923 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, TW_GT=0.077] autolearn=ham Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BQinfoylSnUv for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 14:50:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ww0-f46.google.com (mail-ww0-f46.google.com [74.125.82.46]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11E9F75002F for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 14:49:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwb13 with SMTP id 13so574681wwb.27 for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 07:49:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=+LqtlVFv/AGfeOklwa2dQmzZrq4C9gSxITxKNGAu3YU=; b=Ogn5qhkgLTRPqH1lCR0Spo7X75HlrSew4BSFCC2JM35YU2zWE51WOf3BFnU1PUiTe0 ++ak5tS9QblvFa+g/rbciBiWMR18zHCOi+1IjmybhVgywdKT7Z9v8afXDjZxeKdJ89V5 L8uE8eGpem99042JK6fRVzpzd/yANZCzsXvaA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=QbvXVC3t6Y1QIyOx37JzeoSOzrt9n3TKaTCQRyK3UTbLk6bdzeOg/IvYKjnTyL3uoj sAzx28M5mxn50smy9hU1Y+gEe541KfBLHivqo7ojVfl+fOowE7KfAJazG0Jh1e0vMI/6 6Cz0fZpNA82PEwo/k//zO7vtv2rZCFovy+wLQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.13.17 with SMTP id a17mr1691249wea.46.1287154189602; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 07:49:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.46.7 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 07:49:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 10:49:49 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: user accounts From: Matthias Clasen To: Control Center List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: gnomecc-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME Control Center List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 14:50:02 -0000 Hey guys, there has been some discussion about moving the user accounts dialog [1] into control-center. It has been converted to a cc panel a while ago, and I recently fixed it up to make it work with current GTK+ and to drop the polkit-gtk dependency. Ray already proposed the accounts-service that it relies on as an external dependency. So, as far as dependencies go, it should be pretty much ready to be merged. There's some work that needs to be done after a merge: - Look at some of the unimplemented parts of the UI and figure out what to do about them (Restrictions, guest accounts, etc) - Figure out how it relates/overlaps with the other accounts panel - Ask for some design update. Maybe we need some refresh to make this fit better in the control-center setting ? I'll be gone at the GTK+ hackfest next week, so I'll leave it in Bastiens, Richards, and everybody elses hands whether to go ahead with the merge, or at least do some preparations for it. Matthias [1] http://git.gnome.org/browse/accounts-dialog/