Activation of remote objects

From aparna.nand@wipro.com Sat Mar 4 01:19:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome-components-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnome-components-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C80AB3B1E8E for ; Sat, 4 Mar 2006 01:19:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19905-07 for ; Sat, 4 Mar 2006 01:19:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from wip-ec-wd.wipro.com (wip-ec-wd.wipro.com [203.91.193.32]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B0EB3B1E8C for ; Sat, 4 Mar 2006 01:19:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from wip-ec-wd.wipro.com (localhost.wipro.com [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C881205E6 for ; Sat, 4 Mar 2006 11:34:03 +0530 (IST) Received: from blr-ec-bh02.wipro.com (blr-ec-bh02.wipro.com [10.201.50.92]) by wip-ec-wd.wipro.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CF8E205E3 for ; Sat, 4 Mar 2006 11:34:03 +0530 (IST) Received: from HYD-MDP-MBX01.wipro.com ([10.150.50.181]) by blr-ec-bh02.wipro.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sat, 4 Mar 2006 11:49:31 +0530 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C63F53.9923F8AE" Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 11:49:31 +0530 Message-ID: <2E7899FA2A83AB4480078DA88C8F10FB607ED0@HYD-MDP-MBX01.wipro.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Activation of remote objects Thread-Index: AcY/U5kXjFuU0sfOSKmyz1//dAiRNQ== From: To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Mar 2006 06:19:31.0548 (UTC) FILETIME=[996C39C0:01C63F53] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.273 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.185, HTML_40_50=0.496, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_REAL_NAME=0.961] X-Spam-Score: 1.273 X-Spam-Level: * Subject: Activation of remote objects X-BeenThere: gnome-components-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: component/document model List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2006 06:19:35 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C63F53.9923F8AE Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Does bonobo support using of remote objects. I have the IOR of the = object on the remote machine and machines IP address. Bonobo is also = activated on the remote object. I want to query the remote object . How = do I tell bonobo to query the remote object instead of the local object = (I dont see a provision to specify OAFAID in configuration)? Any help on = this will be appreciated. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C63F53.9923F8AE Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Activation of remote objects

Does bonobo support using of remote objects. I have = the IOR of the object on the remote machine and machines IP address. = Bonobo is also activated on the remote object. I want to query the = remote object . How do I tell bonobo to query the remote object instead = of the local object (I dont see a provision to specify OAFAID in = configuration)? Any help on this will be appreciated.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C63F53.9923F8AE-- From mark@skynet.ie Mon Mar 6 07:24:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome-components-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnome-components-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C43073B2F9E for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2006 07:24:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17971-03 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2006 07:24:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail12.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net (mail12.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net [159.134.118.28]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B9D953B2E96 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2006 07:24:01 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 24172 messnum 5770669 invoked from network[83.71.35.21/83-71-35-21.b-ras1.srl.dublin.eircom.net]); 6 Mar 2006 12:24:00 -0000 Received: from 83-71-35-21.b-ras1.srl.dublin.eircom.net (HELO ?172.31.0.4?) (83.71.35.21) by mail12.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net (qp 24172) with SMTP; 6 Mar 2006 12:24:00 -0000 From: Mark McLoughlin To: Rodrigo Moya In-Reply-To: <1139968295.8594.4.camel@formigal.home> References: <1138979039.25717.5.camel@linux.site> <1138980702.4381.8.camel@formigal.home> <1138981475.3729.25.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1138982609.4381.16.camel@formigal.home> <1139968295.8594.4.camel@formigal.home> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 12:23:53 +0000 Message-Id: <1141647833.4816.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.5.90 (2.5.90-2.1) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.777 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-0.667, BAYES_05=-1.11] X-Spam-Score: -1.777 X-Spam-Level: Cc: bonobo , vuntz@gnome.org, michael.meeks@novell.com Subject: Re: bonobo_get_object_async (take 2)... X-BeenThere: gnome-components-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: component/document model List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 12:24:07 -0000 Hi Rodrigo, This version looks much more plausible. Remove this bit, though: > + g_warning ("Patent Meeks activation code"); Cheers, Mark. From rodrigo@gnome-db.org Mon Mar 6 08:20:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome-components-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnome-components-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 256D03B109F for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2006 08:20:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21860-02 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2006 08:20:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from peabody.ximian.com (peabody.ximian.com [130.57.169.10]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E52653B114D for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2006 08:20:21 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 15410 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2006 13:20:20 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO 164-99-120-94.boston.ximian.com) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 6 Mar 2006 13:20:20 -0000 From: Rodrigo Moya To: Vincent Untz In-Reply-To: <1140248376.22987.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1138979039.25717.5.camel@linux.site> <1138980702.4381.8.camel@formigal.home> <1138981475.3729.25.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1138982609.4381.16.camel@formigal.home> <1139968295.8594.4.camel@formigal.home> <1140248376.22987.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 14:18:42 +0100 Message-Id: <1141651122.3682.7.camel@arette.site> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.561 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.038, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.561 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Mark McLoughlin , michael.meeks@novell.com, bonobo Subject: Re: bonobo_get_object_async (take 2)... X-BeenThere: gnome-components-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: component/document model List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 13:20:24 -0000 On Sat, 2006-02-18 at 08:39 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Le mercredi 15 février 2006 à 02:51 +0100, Rodrigo Moya a écrit : > > On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 17:03 +0100, Rodrigo Moya wrote: > > > On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 15:44 +0000, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > > > > Hi Rodrigo, > > > > It's pretty bad form to send completely untested patches ... > > > > > > it wasn't completely untested, since it was working for me, at least for > > some applets. But it was wrong though, so here's a better one. There are > > no significant speed improvements, but at least if one applet fails > > loading, the panel won't block waiting for it to answer or timeout. > > Since I'm easily lost in bonobo-land, I'd very much like to see Mark > review the patch ;-) > > Just wondering if it's appropriate for 2.14 now that we're nearing the > RC release... Maybe it's better to wait for 2.15? > as you want, but we (Michael, me and all nld10 beta users) have been using this for some weeks, with no problem at all. -- Rodrigo Moya From nshmyrev@yandex.ru Mon Mar 6 14:08:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome-components-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnome-components-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB3A43B0836 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2006 14:08:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11447-08 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2006 14:08:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from hq.sectorb.msk.ru (petaflop.b.gz.ru [217.67.124.5]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1E243B286F for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2006 14:08:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from [172.16.15.44] (unknown [172.16.15.44]) by hq.sectorb.msk.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3205186F; Mon, 6 Mar 2006 22:08:04 +0300 (MSK) From: "Nickolay V. Shmyrev" To: aparna.nand@wipro.com In-Reply-To: <2E7899FA2A83AB4480078DA88C8F10FB607ED0@HYD-MDP-MBX01.wipro.com> References: <2E7899FA2A83AB4480078DA88C8F10FB607ED0@HYD-MDP-MBX01.wipro.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 22:08:34 +0300 Message-Id: <1141672114.22844.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.788 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-0.393, BAYES_00=-2.599, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.135, SPF_NEUTRAL=1.069] X-Spam-Score: -1.788 X-Spam-Level: Cc: gnome-components-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: Activation of remote objects X-BeenThere: gnome-components-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: component/document model List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 19:08:10 -0000 Ð’ Ð¡Ð±Ñ‚, 04/03/2006 Ð² 11:49 +0530, aparna.nand@wipro.com Ð¿Ð¸ÑˆÐµÑ‚: > Does bonobo support using of remote objects. I have the IOR of the > object on the remote machine and machines IP address. Bonobo is also > activated on the remote object. I want to query the remote object . > How do I tell bonobo to query the remote object instead of the local > object (I dont see a provision to specify OAFAID in configuration)? > Any help on this will be appreciated. Sorry, probably I've misunderstood your question, but what prevents you to get CORBA_Object from IOR with ORBA_ORB_string_to_object function as in this example http://icps.u-strasbg.fr/~genaud/ORBIT/x259.html and then operate with it as with usual object? Bonobo doesn't matter here since Bonobo object is just a CORBA_Object that implements some interfaces, for example, interface for ref counting. From krishna.vamsi@wipro.com Mon Mar 20 01:30:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome-components-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnome-components-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DD9C3B0C29; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 01:30:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02937-01; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 01:30:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from wip-ec-wd.wipro.com (wip-ec-wd.wipro.com [203.91.193.32]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B9983B0BC1; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 01:30:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from wip-ec-wd.wipro.com (localhost.wipro.com [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEAA3205DB; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 12:00:22 +0530 (IST) Received: from blr-ec-bh02.wipro.com (blr-ec-bh02.wipro.com [10.201.50.92]) by wip-ec-wd.wipro.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2B1E205D9; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 12:00:22 +0530 (IST) Received: from blr-itp-msg.wipro.com ([10.185.50.99]) by blr-ec-bh02.wipro.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 20 Mar 2006 12:00:22 +0530 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C64BE7.C3D4E2FC" Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 12:00:22 +0530 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Bonobo - Accessibility Technology Distributed Arch. Thread-Index: AcZL5k9VnxYEa4WKQRqOUhiLV+G3ZwAAPq3g From: To: , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Mar 2006 06:30:22.0781 (UTC) FILETIME=[C4327ED0:01C64BE7] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.159 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-0.804, BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_REAL_NAME=0.961] X-Spam-Score: 0.159 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Subject: Bonobo - Accessibility Technology Distributed Arch. X-BeenThere: gnome-components-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: component/document model List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 06:30:30 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C64BE7.C3D4E2FC Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi List, Note : Please view the mail in Rich text Format as the diagram is formatted using the same. > I'm thinking of distributed architecutre for Accessibility technology, > Typical architecture contains two m/c's.For more infor refer to the > picture below. >=20 > MC-1 contains the gail and the atk-bridge and mc-2 contains the > AT-SPID and AT-CLIENT such as screen magnifier. AT-SPID has to > communicate with ATK-BRIDGE get/put request.Communication is based on > Bonobo/Corba Objects. >=20 > I'm struck with two questions here... >=20 > 1. Bonobo AF(Activation Framework) is responsible to activate AT-SPID, > currently does the bonobo AF has the capability to Activate the > AT-SPId on remote m/c. > if yes, can you suggest some sites where can i get this help ? > if not, are there any un-official hacks to do the same ?? >=20 > 2. if Activation succeeds is the bonobo capable of communicating with > the Other m/cs Bonobo and how it can be done?=20 >=20 > Below is the pictorial representation of the what I described above. > ------------------------------------------------ > | > | > | ---------- ------------------- | > | | gail | ---------> | | |=20 > | | | | ATK-BRIDGE |---- > |-------->********* > | | | <--------- | |<--- > |---------********* Communicating with AT_SPID > | ---------- -------------------- | > | M/c - 1 > | > ------------------------------------------------ >=20 >=20 > =09 > -------------------------------------------------------------- > | > | > | > -------------- ---------------------- > | > COMM. WITH BRIDGE | | | --------->| > | | > ******** ---------------------- |->| AT-SPID | | > AT-CLIENT | | > ********<--------------------- |- | | <--------- > |SCREEN-READER | |=20 > | > -------------- |-----------------------| > | > | M/c - 2 > | > =09 > |------------------------------------------------------------| >=20 -Vamsi ------_=_NextPart_001_01C64BE7.C3D4E2FC Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Bonobo - Accessibility Technology Distributed Arch.

Hi List,

Note : Please view the mail in Rich text Format as the = diagram is formatted using the same.

I'm thinking of distributed architecutre for Accessibility = technology, Typical architecture contains two m/c's.For more infor refer = to the picture below.

MC-1 contains the gail and the atk-bridge and mc-2 contains the = AT-SPID and AT-CLIENT such as screen magnifier. AT-SPID has to = communicate with ATK-BRIDGE get/put request.Communication is based = on Bonobo/Corba Objects.

I'm struck with two questions here...

1. Bonobo AF(Activation Framework) is responsible to activate = AT-SPID, currently does the bonobo AF has the capability to Activate the = AT-SPId on remote m/c.

if yes, can you = suggest some sites where can i get this help ?
= if not, are = there any un-official hacks to do the same ??

2. if Activation succeeds is the bonobo capable of = communicating with the Other m/cs Bonobo and how it can be done?

Below is the pictorial representation of the what I described = above.
------------------------------------------------
|       =         =         =         =         =         =         =         =         =       |
| = ----------          &nb= sp;   -------------------   =         |
| | gail   | ---------> = |            =         | |
| |         = |            =    | ATK-BRIDGE |---- = |-------->*********
| |         | = <--------- |          =            =      |<---      = |---------********* Communicating with AT_SPID
| = ----------          &nb= sp;    -------------------- |
|        M/c - = 1        =         =         =         =         =         =         |
------------------------------------------------

= = = = = = = --------------------------------------------------------------

= = = = = = | = = = = = = = = = = = |

= = = = = = | = -------------- = ; = ---------------------- = |

COMM. WITH BRIDGE = | = | = | = --------->| = ; = = | = = |

******** ---------------------- |->| AT-SPID = |            = | AT-CLIENT         | =              = |
********<---------------------   |- |   =            | = <--------- |SCREEN-READER |       =         |
        =         =         =         =         =         =         |   = --------------          = ;         = |-----------------------|    =         |

= = = = = = | = M/c - 2 = = = = = = = = |

= = = = = = = |------------------------------------------------------------|

-Vamsi

------_=_NextPart_001_01C64BE7.C3D4E2FC-- From nshmyrev@yandex.ru Mon Mar 20 09:42:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome-components-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnome-components-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F2C63B2310; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 09:42:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 31517-07; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 09:42:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from t111.niisi.ras.ru (t111.niisi.ras.ru [193.232.173.111]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FB263B22DC; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 09:42:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from t111.niisi.ras.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by t111.niisi.ras.ru (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k2KEg0Bq007858; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 17:42:01 +0300 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by t111.niisi.ras.ru (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with UUCP id k2KEg03j007855; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 17:42:00 +0300 Received: from t94 (t94 [193.232.173.94]) by aa19.niisi.msk.ru (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k2KEenNe003272; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 17:40:50 +0300 From: "Nickolay V. Shmyrev" To: krishna.vamsi@wipro.com In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 17:40:48 +0300 Message-Id: <1142865648.30339.16.camel@t94> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.1 (2.0.1-4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.817 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-0.287, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_NEUTRAL=1.069] X-Spam-Score: -1.817 X-Spam-Level: Cc: gnome-components-list@gnome.org, gnome-accessibility-devel@gnome.org Subject: Re: Bonobo - Accessibility Technology Distributed Arch. X-BeenThere: gnome-components-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: component/document model List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 14:42:10 -0000 ÷ ðÎÄ, 20/03/2006 × 12:00 +0530, krishna.vamsi@wipro.com ÐÉÛÅÔ: > > Hi List, > > Note : Please view the mail in Rich text Format as the diagram > is formatted using the same. > > > I'm thinking of distributed architecutre for Accessibility > technology, Typical architecture contains two m/c's.For more > infor refer to the picture below. > > MC-1 contains the gail and the atk-bridge and mc-2 contains > the AT-SPID and AT-CLIENT such as screen magnifier. AT-SPID > has to communicate with ATK-BRIDGE get/put > request.Communication is based on Bonobo/Corba Objects. > > I'm struck with two questions here... > > 1. Bonobo AF(Activation Framework) is responsible to activate > AT-SPID, currently does the bonobo AF has the capability to > Activate the AT-SPId on remote m/c. > > if yes, can you suggest some sites where can i get > this help ? > if not, are there any un-official hacks to do the > same ?? > > 2. if Activation succeeds is the bonobo capable of > communicating with the Other m/cs Bonobo and how it can be > done? > > Below is the pictorial representation of the what I described > above. First of all about 2, bonobo object should be able to communicate with other object if activated, there should not be any problem with it. Situation with 1 is worse. Bonobo doesn't support remote activation yet as far as I know. But I suspect it's not hard to implement this and it should be nice feature. I see it in implementation of new type in object description (currently we have factory, exe and shlib there, it may be possible to add something like "remote"). If you'll implement it, that would be great. As a hack I can suggest the following. On activation of binary factory the following things are happen: bonobo-activation-server runs an executable as a child process, creates pipe and passes --ior-fd to child. After activation child writes IOR of Corba object back to activation server. You can create a binary or a shell script that on start will go to remote machine and run spid with --oaf-ior-fd, get IOR of new object as bonobo-activation-server does. After that you can pass that IOR from remote machine to b-a-s on local machine. Hope, that will work. The full scheme if quite complicated, for example if factory executable won't get --oaf-ior-fd, it will try to fork server and register on it, hope, that behaviour will be cleaned someday. Probably --oaf-ior-fd can be removed. From gk4@austin.ibm.com Tue Mar 21 09:25:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome-components-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnome-components-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEDE83B0899; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 09:25:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09010-05; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 09:25:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from e31.co.us.ibm.com (e31.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.149]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7665C3B14C1; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 09:24:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.11]) by e31.co.us.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k2LEOr3B010088; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 09:24:53 -0500 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (d03av01.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.167]) by westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VER6.8) with ESMTP id k2LELrPM177186; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 07:21:53 -0700 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k2LEOrHX029632; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 07:24:53 -0700 Received: from gk4.austin.ibm.com (gk4.austin.ibm.com [9.53.33.16]) by d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k2LEOq1q029593; Tue, 21 Mar 2006 07:24:52 -0700 From: George Kraft To: "Nickolay V. Shmyrev" In-Reply-To: <1142865648.30339.16.camel@t94> References: <1142865648.30339.16.camel@t94> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: IBM Corp Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 08:21:55 -0600 Message-Id: <1142950915.12060.25.camel@gk4.austin.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-3) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.336 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.263, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -2.336 X-Spam-Level: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 12:15:43 -0500 Cc: gnome-components-list@gnome.org, gnome-accessibility-devel@gnome.org Subject: Re: [g-a-devel] Re: Bonobo - Accessibility Technology Distributed Arch. X-BeenThere: gnome-components-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gk4@austin.ibm.com List-Id: component/document model List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 14:25:24 -0000 > > I'm struck with two questions here... > > > > 1. Bonobo AF(Activation Framework) is responsible to activate > > AT-SPID, currently does the bonobo AF has the capability to > > Activate the AT-SPId on remote m/c. > > > > if yes, can you suggest some sites where can i get > > this help ? > > if not, are there any un-official hacks to do the > > same ?? > Situation with 1 is worse. Bonobo doesn't support remote activation yet > as far as I know. But I suspect it's not hard to implement this and it > should be nice feature. I see it in implementation of new type in object > description (currently we have factory, exe and shlib there, it may be > possible to add something like "remote"). If you'll implement it, that > would be great. I think there should only be one atspid per display, and all X11 applications should rendezvous with atspid via Xserver authentication and X11 inter-client communications. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163132 George (gk4) From aparna.nand@wipro.com Sat Mar 4 01:19:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome-components-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnome-components-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C80AB3B1E8E for ; Sat, 4 Mar 2006 01:19:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19905-07 for ; Sat, 4 Mar 2006 01:19:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from wip-ec-wd.wipro.com (wip-ec-wd.wipro.com [203.91.193.32]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B0EB3B1E8C for ; Sat, 4 Mar 2006 01:19:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from wip-ec-wd.wipro.com (localhost.wipro.com [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C881205E6 for ; Sat, 4 Mar 2006 11:34:03 +0530 (IST) Received: from blr-ec-bh02.wipro.com (blr-ec-bh02.wipro.com [10.201.50.92]) by wip-ec-wd.wipro.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CF8E205E3 for ; Sat, 4 Mar 2006 11:34:03 +0530 (IST) Received: from HYD-MDP-MBX01.wipro.com ([10.150.50.181]) by blr-ec-bh02.wipro.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sat, 4 Mar 2006 11:49:31 +0530 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C63F53.9923F8AE" Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 11:49:31 +0530 Message-ID: <2E7899FA2A83AB4480078DA88C8F10FB607ED0@HYD-MDP-MBX01.wipro.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Activation of remote objects Thread-Index: AcY/U5kXjFuU0sfOSKmyz1//dAiRNQ== From: To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Mar 2006 06:19:31.0548 (UTC) FILETIME=[996C39C0:01C63F53] X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.273 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.185, HTML_40_50=0.496, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_REAL_NAME=0.961] X-Spam-Score: 1.273 X-Spam-Level: * Subject: Activation of remote objects X-BeenThere: gnome-components-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: component/document model List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2006 06:19:35 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C63F53.9923F8AE Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Does bonobo support using of remote objects. I have the IOR of the = object on the remote machine and machines IP address. Bonobo is also = activated on the remote object. I want to query the remote object . How = do I tell bonobo to query the remote object instead of the local object = (I dont see a provision to specify OAFAID in configuration)? Any help on = this will be appreciated. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C63F53.9923F8AE Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Activation of remote objects

Hi List,

Note : Please view the mail in Rich text Format as the = diagram is formatted using the same.

I'm thinking of distributed architecutre for Accessibility = technology, Typical architecture contains two m/c's.For more infor refer = to the picture below.

I'm struck with two questions here...

1. Bonobo AF(Activation Framework) is responsible to activate = AT-SPID, currently does the bonobo AF has the capability to Activate the = AT-SPId on remote m/c.

if yes, can you = suggest some sites where can i get this help ?
= if not, are = there any un-official hacks to do the same ??

2. if Activation succeeds is the bonobo capable of = communicating with the Other m/cs Bonobo and how it can be done?

= = = = = = = --------------------------------------------------------------

= = = = = = | = = = = = = = = = = = |

= = = = = = | = -------------- = ; = ---------------------- = |

COMM. WITH BRIDGE = | = | = | = --------->| = ; = = | = = |

= = = = = = | = M/c - 2 = = = = = = = = |

= = = = = = = |------------------------------------------------------------|

-Vamsi

Hi List,

Note : Please view the mail in Rich text Format as the = diagram is formatted using the same.

I'm thinking of distributed architecutre for Accessibility = technology, Typical architecture contains two m/c's.For more infor refer = to the picture below.

I'm struck with two questions here...

1. Bonobo AF(Activation Framework) is responsible to activate = AT-SPID, currently does the bonobo AF has the capability to Activate the = AT-SPId on remote m/c.

if yes, can you = suggest some sites where can i get this help ?
= if not, are = there any un-official hacks to do the same ??

2. if Activation succeeds is the bonobo capable of = communicating with the Other m/cs Bonobo and how it can be done?

= = = = = = = --------------------------------------------------------------

= = = = = = | = = = = = = = = = = = |

= = = = = = | = -------------- = ; = ---------------------- = |

COMM. WITH BRIDGE = | = | = | = --------->| = ; = = | = = |

= = = = = = | = M/c - 2 = = = = = = = = |

= = = = = = = |------------------------------------------------------------|

-Vamsi