From thebackscratcher@yahoo.com Tue Jul 1 02:33:08 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD344750105 for ; Tue, 1 Jul 2008 02:33:08 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.221 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.221 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, L_P0F_Unix=-1, TVD_SPACE_RATIO=2.219] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: FreeBSD 6.x (1) (up: 7207 hrs), (distance 10, link: ethernet/modem), [98.136.44.46] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XEMT80ZtVvnq for ; Tue, 1 Jul 2008 02:32:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from n58.bullet.mail.sp1.yahoo.com (n58.bullet.mail.sp1.yahoo.com [98.136.44.46]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A3EA0750197 for ; Tue, 1 Jul 2008 02:32:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [216.252.122.218] by n58.bullet.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Jul 2008 02:32:37 -0000 Received: from [69.147.84.100] by t3.bullet.sp1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Jul 2008 02:32:37 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp201.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Jul 2008 02:32:37 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 964783.56276.bm@omp201.mail.sp1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 16704 invoked by uid 60001); 1 Jul 2008 02:32:37 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=D1hbAfTRP4vuBLe3czaZVonTeIASP3OPOy4/IBUoAMT2e6JDO3m6Ymz5d7JQ2fUEg3+PtgU680UEJB1vFlY0+3SWYhXdcmNbH9iClWH1HBm6kQG7fRnSlADGlNewXdyysNhoVXAPc9yNOeAoKA+OKopQJ1K2M34/kYT4LPh7EVU=; Received: from [98.224.234.159] by web45715.mail.sp1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 19:32:37 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/975.45 YahooMailWebService/0.7.199 Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 19:32:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Back Scratcher Subject: thebackscratcher@yahoo.com To: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1015455474-1214879557=:16601" Message-ID: <785642.16601.qm@web45715.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> X-BeenThere: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: List to discuss bug maintenance in GNOME List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2008 02:33:09 -0000 --0-1015455474-1214879557=:16601 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii thebackscratcher@yahoo.com --0-1015455474-1214879557=:16601 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

thebackscratcher@yahoo.com

--0-1015455474-1214879557=:16601-- From muelli@cryptobitch.de Tue Jul 8 12:55:29 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 025B9750006; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 12:55:29 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) (up: 5877 hrs), (distance 26, link: ethernet/modem), [88.198.7.68] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nDmFSOOhYRtR; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 12:55:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.cryptobitch.de (cryptobitch.de [88.198.7.68]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 413E4750093; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 12:55:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (rzdspc10.informatik.uni-hamburg.de [134.100.9.63]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.cryptobitch.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CD10DCF71; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 14:58:09 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4873635F.2080301@auftrags-killer.org> Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 15:53:51 +0300 From: Tobias Mueller User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080505) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org Subject: GUADEC: Bugsquad BoF References: <1204206077.28250.10.camel@localhost6.localdomain6> In-Reply-To: <1204206077.28250.10.camel@localhost6.localdomain6> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: guadec-list@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: List to discuss bug maintenance in GNOME List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 12:55:29 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hey Dudes :) On 28.02.2008 15:41, Andre Klapper wrote: > i'm thinking of submitting a guadec tangle proposal for triaging bugs in > gnome bugzilla. is that a good idea? anybody interested in joining so we > can hold the potential workshop in a team? :) > We just did that today, and I think it went pretty successfully. But there was some confusion about the time and the place of our bugsquad-session, so there were many people coming too late. Thus we are happy to announce that we will do that session again and we will meet on Thursday, 15:30 just in front of the info-booth So if you are interested in getting started with bug-triaging in GNOME, feel free to join us! Our set of Triagers just increased by one talented triager. Goran, feel free to introduce yourself on gnome-bugsquad or ask any question here or on IRC. We are in #bugs on GimpNet. If you are interested in the slides, feel free to checkout the TeX sources from our mercurial repository at http://hg.cryptobitch.de/gnome-bugsquad/. Cheers, Tobi, Andre, Bruno and Pedro -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIc2NfPuBX/6ogjZ4RApCFAJ9A1yemxTDvr+kQ3Tcui5GXFMRtgACdHZc0 rzqGqkHE7BwUEaF5EKhcZGo= =xoTZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From grakic@devbase.net Tue Jul 8 13:38:58 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1A66750006; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 13:38:58 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, L_P0F_Unix=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: FreeBSD 4.6-4.9 (up: 3185 hrs), (distance 16, link: ethernet/modem), [216.86.168.178] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NnRGAqiab+Bt; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 13:38:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0E92750091; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 13:38:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from php5.irbs.net (php5.irbs.net [216.86.168.246]) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAC6323E49F; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 09:38:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wmbeta.mxes.net (php5.irbs.net [216.86.168.246]) by php5.irbs.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76F756CC37; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 09:38:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 193.255.77.126 by wmbeta.mxes.net with HTTP; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 15:38:23 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <39693.193.255.77.126.1215524303.squirrel@wmbeta.mxes.net> Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 15:38:23 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Goran's Introduction (Was: GUADEC: Bugsquad BoF) From: "Goran Rakic" To: "Tobias Mueller" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: guadec-list@gnome.org, gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: List to discuss bug maintenance in GNOME List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 13:38:59 -0000 Dana Uto, 8 Jul, 2008 14:53 , Tobias Mueller je napisao/la > > Goran, feel free to introduce yourself on gnome-bugsquad or ask any > question here or on IRC. We are in #bugs on GimpNet. > Hi, I'm Goran Rakic, from Belgrade and bugsquad newbie since today. You see how great atmosphere here in Istanbul makes people do silly things :) In GNOME-life, I'm doing GNOME Serbian l10n from 2003 and I was Summer of Code student in 2006 (library.gnome.org). I have 7 bugzilla points, but luckily that will improve soon. See you at unofficial BoF on thursday. Cheers, Goran From reinouts@gnome.org Thu Jul 10 11:24:20 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3CD275010C for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 11:24:20 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) (up: 50 hrs), (distance 15, link: ethernet/modem), [208.97.132.177] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XD5iJxLJjAGh for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 11:23:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from randymail-a5.g.dreamhost.com (sd-green-bigip-177.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.177]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D32227500D2 for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 11:23:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [0.0.0.0] (bob.dreamhost.com [66.33.205.8]) by randymail-a5.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5C0590D4D for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 04:23:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4875F134.9080106@gnome.org> Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:23:32 +0300 From: Reinout van Schouwen User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080305) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org Subject: Inhibit bug-buddy on upgrade Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: List to discuss bug maintenance in GNOME List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 11:24:20 -0000 Hi all, I just closed the gazillionth Epiphany crash bug caused by someone doing a dist-upgrade. That got me thinking: Couldn't bug-buddy be inhibited while doing package upgrades in the background? Thanks, -- Reinout van Schouwen From dieguito@gmail.com Thu Jul 10 12:08:25 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6379C750095 for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 12:08:25 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) (firewall!) (up: 8728 hrs), (distance 15, link: (Google 2)), [74.125.44.29] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oJixjEvlSz3B for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 12:08:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from yx-out-2324.google.com (yx-out-2324.google.com [74.125.44.29]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 937567500B5 for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 12:08:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: by yx-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 8so886173yxb.63 for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 05:08:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=00Dg66AGqnEJnKpcmz7QpzDw+xXRKB1idL6USwmNmeM=; b=AqX6r3lwlVzmyNyUHEU9JTWZTm3fr5mneDabBavxRaSfGxg1wX5ZLoIHcOBBNcVqF4 LO7o35u/zk4LGLsOOWAuT9V6nVy8cAI+gk7w/df15llXL2REZTHLjNdiToZStRAO5/N7 rhsC3WAQboKXvxO45oB2qf0Ld2oL2PI2n2GbI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=UkkBoW/mRFf/b9Q+x9OKLSKBqye6QxGSiGHU1VFqZkvU1qMubC33d3viweRpqKRz9h FynsVb3vZ/BI6JguxClcnrHDF2C7EUBrEv+d29dvVGv/UJPo8z7iLqKpZVswz0JjHw1B 5nU12ItsqGZP1JaU29zEQ7VAiANbuD2LxPcOM= Received: by 10.142.48.3 with SMTP id v3mr2724180wfv.124.1215691698077; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 05:08:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.110.20 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 05:08:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 15:08:18 +0300 From: "Diego Escalante Urrelo" Sender: dieguito@gmail.com To: "Reinout van Schouwen" Subject: Re: Inhibit bug-buddy on upgrade In-Reply-To: <4875F134.9080106@gnome.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4875F134.9080106@gnome.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: a5ad0f819c6de623 Cc: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: List to discuss bug maintenance in GNOME List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 12:08:25 -0000 Hey, On 7/10/08, Reinout van Schouwen wrote: > Hi all, > > I just closed the gazillionth Epiphany crash bug caused by someone doing > a dist-upgrade. > That got me thinking: Couldn't bug-buddy be inhibited while doing > package upgrades in the background? > There's a BugSquad bug party at 15:30 I think... After GTK+ SotU. Would be good to get discuss that there. From andrew.conkling@gmail.com Sat Jul 12 03:30:38 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F957750008 for ; Sat, 12 Jul 2008 03:30:38 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.109 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.109 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_05=-1.11, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) (firewall!) (up: 11771 hrs), (distance 13, link: (Google 2)), [209.85.198.235] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WyUO4b2qaBsE for ; Sat, 12 Jul 2008 03:30:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.235]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E19697501AE for ; Sat, 12 Jul 2008 03:30:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id f6so3910889rvb.3 for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 20:30:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=u0L4pblgpon0ETaquNWVTkNK4KAu33yolabXbPMYVaA=; b=HBP7gqF1vjcJbZvU64VJ5GhgE7oIK+xtOGJ5oCuAYHRv7N7aP/HfZHSlja6VyXu2L5 92YRPIhPLhSQ8yElMWahLYqRr30yZwaO1aAl2EwweQ9I2dsPGex0vn+mEzrPXmZcRae+ n9rDlD4H/EA4xnEZOBTd+VVi3ariC0fxY/hVU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=RHDJjXXqRs0EM5hIrxgXHMTRt5JBNtkm+vP6sWKFXdiJJsZjceMltnzlExFlN7xKeQ LAO5eFYthgKY3mBrTk41Ab4eWpzykpLYNUQa8sD9fAELumvH5qrjgkpDftAOoOGi7uOE aoyO7S3I1LR8qIg+0E+y/lM1CjxTkySo6bF0Q= Received: by 10.115.77.1 with SMTP id e1mr15173869wal.58.1215833428964; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 20:30:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.167.5 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 20:30:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <616971f10807112030n12274b5bxfaae912a1d2317df@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 23:30:28 -0400 From: "Andrew Conkling" To: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org Subject: Attaching ripped media on bugs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_42007_109954.1215833428950" X-BeenThere: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: List to discuss bug maintenance in GNOME List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 03:30:38 -0000 ------=_Part_42007_109954.1215833428950 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Can someone advise on this bug? http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=542562 Seems the reporter is having trouble with Banshee importing/reading partially downloaded files from torrents, and attached one. As useless as it might be, I don't think it's in GNOME's best interest to be hosting these files. I'm not sure how to proceed. Also, I smell a tactfully worded NOTABUG or WONTFIX coming. :) Cheers, Andrew ------=_Part_42007_109954.1215833428950 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Can someone advise on this bug? http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=542562

Seems the reporter is having trouble with Banshee importing/reading partially downloaded files from torrents, and attached one. As useless as it might be, I don't think it's in GNOME's best interest to be hosting these files. I'm not sure how to proceed.

Also, I smell a tactfully worded NOTABUG or WONTFIX coming. :)

Cheers,
Andrew
------=_Part_42007_109954.1215833428950-- From luis.villa@gmail.com Sat Jul 12 04:50:29 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ACF2750030 for ; Sat, 12 Jul 2008 04:50:29 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) (firewall!) (up: 5742 hrs), (distance 16, link: (Google 2)), [209.85.132.248] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y+b2enkbxqnu for ; Sat, 12 Jul 2008 04:50:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.248]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC832750095 for ; Sat, 12 Jul 2008 04:50:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c3so726126ana.27 for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 21:50:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=cPmYykkScvO4k1rBos8tIBVLWTiRxi610s4Wa4fvWAw=; b=bC0kveeBA+y9ZP6H5OA6iWuE0dVQ0KE25d1hhEkD1wCXV2SAGnsJw5IA3zB8Gjsb7P inG/C7RNzJ/SR+TpElYZv5xyvxa99iZl1ksDk+U3OQ48U6z7AEgsEKhKwB2DsqlFTApz rphFUp4JVFh1T10pL2hihYg5dvSiLjyTG07Vo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=B10WcGOsNWiJMNetYDrIq3gwtMsHz9iObaeTKeKqKylSliTwZhab68lc5ED4HItrtQ G5hX7bEqPrwqEOQjtt22BIlxJ8YjvJbG4cUZUXzfm1m9cjZpgi+8F1PGmnCj6P9x9JD6 Nt8kBUBBX7wZG3dNtIYNgd5UuCwjkrR0NqrpU= Received: by 10.100.14.2 with SMTP id 2mr9149163ann.67.1215838219730; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 21:50:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.6.7 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 21:50:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2cb10c440807112150x7637cf79l4c057abe8ca62f5f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 07:50:19 +0300 From: "Luis Villa" Sender: luis.villa@gmail.com To: "Andrew Conkling" Subject: Re: Attaching ripped media on bugs In-Reply-To: <616971f10807112030n12274b5bxfaae912a1d2317df@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <616971f10807112030n12274b5bxfaae912a1d2317df@mail.gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 587f79409add9569 Cc: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: List to discuss bug maintenance in GNOME List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 04:50:29 -0000 Typically we ask the reporter to email the file to the maintainer in that case. (It is relatively rare in the media case; common in the case of gnumeric spreadsheets with private information.) Luis On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 6:30 AM, Andrew Conkling wrote: > Can someone advise on this bug? > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=542562 > > Seems the reporter is having trouble with Banshee importing/reading > partially downloaded files from torrents, and attached one. As useless as it > might be, I don't think it's in GNOME's best interest to be hosting these > files. I'm not sure how to proceed. > > Also, I smell a tactfully worded NOTABUG or WONTFIX coming. :) > > Cheers, > Andrew > > _______________________________________________ > Gnome-bugsquad mailing list > Gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-bugsquad > > From andrew.conkling@gmail.com Sat Jul 12 05:18:04 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F0E4750095 for ; Sat, 12 Jul 2008 05:18:04 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) (firewall!) (up: 5708 hrs), (distance 13, link: (Google 2)), [209.85.146.182] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hB25l+hagajm for ; Sat, 12 Jul 2008 05:17:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.182]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DCB075010A for ; Sat, 12 Jul 2008 05:17:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id j40so2969456wah.1 for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 22:17:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=AvW/3FwPCGoQvW/2shueNact8tq6gOJCfTeodl/zvA8=; b=IKO51Ixsc1Y8mwRZpjOGFeifdpvRVU8CUKDA7dDSmlbDBLgANjon9aDtRptUCTepFB Q34uQtRhP7O383/+mlkgF/Txc7GtQORwm7NE3Kksj5r1DlqzCePki4YfofdOgRs6A5o0 kH1lNedOzzqJRedsFORHYg/D7eFX+EtV8G1rw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=VBjvpREC5drEpWMRvIVHhoUIpJxjIoNgVf0Rh7l5ZJVHjxvo6K9YR3ZRWHDFDMoN+t IGojlFPwFY4KuANazLi0j/E6/EYWoPnUm9mf/CWXggJFPj2GXjmUfbqM13KcUzfwOHPX IP7JoiRaHXY7Ci+JKyPYHrwGcdsvOZnwpwXo8= Received: by 10.115.59.2 with SMTP id m2mr15163361wak.197.1215839848821; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 22:17:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.167.5 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 22:17:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <616971f10807112217ic9327d5jce972c746acd4194@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 01:17:28 -0400 From: "Andrew Conkling" To: "Luis Villa" Subject: Re: Attaching ripped media on bugs In-Reply-To: <2cb10c440807112150x7637cf79l4c057abe8ca62f5f@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_42849_12398587.1215839848816" References: <616971f10807112030n12274b5bxfaae912a1d2317df@mail.gmail.com> <2cb10c440807112150x7637cf79l4c057abe8ca62f5f@mail.gmail.com> Cc: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: List to discuss bug maintenance in GNOME List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 05:18:04 -0000 ------=_Part_42849_12398587.1215839848816 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 00:50, Luis Villa wrote: > Typically we ask the reporter to email the file to the maintainer in > that case. (It is relatively rare in the media case; common in the > case of gnumeric spreadsheets with private information.) In the case of 542562, the file is already attached; is there any need to remove it? I'll get the file to someone for this bug, thanks for that idea. On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 6:30 AM, Andrew Conkling > wrote: > > Can someone advise on this bug? > > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=542562 > ------=_Part_42849_12398587.1215839848816 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 00:50, Luis Villa <luis@tieguy.org> wrote:

Typically we ask the reporter to email the file to the maintainer in
that case. (It is relatively rare in the media case; common in the
case of gnumeric spreadsheets with private information.)

In the case of 542562, the file is already attached; is there any need to remove it?

I'll get the file to someone for this bug, thanks for that idea.

On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 6:30 AM, Andrew Conkling
<andrew.conkling@gmail.com> wrote:
> Can someone advise on this bug?
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=542562

------=_Part_42849_12398587.1215839848816-- From christian.kirbach@googlemail.com Wed Jul 16 20:24:35 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEC1475000B for ; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 20:24:34 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) (firewall!) (up: 6067 hrs), (distance 15, link: (Google 2)), [74.125.46.31] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CHFciAssVWdA for ; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 20:24:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com (yw-out-2324.google.com [74.125.46.31]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 431207500E4 for ; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 20:24:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 5so2396661ywh.63 for ; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:24:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:to:subject:cc :content-type:mime-version:references:content-transfer-encoding :message-id:in-reply-to:user-agent:from; bh=l+Z1+lcoXZrpFXwIx1DloPqr17e4iA2ZHeC+uA4pbBI=; b=sNPzwPOYr9m40B6+erv+cJJxqHKc3hK8Y3YHlW7OomGRH0Zs/G6VLppRt8B5H3U4tn VQtvAN2JQa7HL/fQ75y7HzhMJHXo0IyUxv3s8vYs1VfHh1HCxeDdbWsVckJTczkfox4K 0oiweuRQW5csxQ9Q3zcNJGhM1H4mrXM7iyYKY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:to:subject:cc:content-type:mime-version:references :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:in-reply-to:user-agent:from; b=cd1pqRSB4y7Pq2R73qyOvWTOZX2rg8MJuXGkMmNi7EYqp8Pr6wr79uVQ7/vA7+6Lf5 TypySmQpY+uoIU1VTSTjMRu/U/Okp2fTNVjnhh/kNQJZuYT7MbMh5x242PrRRK6bb1Fl kaN93f/zN6iI8tVL5eoPhURvtyvubNoBYVIiE= Received: by 10.103.17.13 with SMTP id u13mr1204865mui.90.1216239860879; Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:24:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rivendell ( [85.181.92.9]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u26sm3568226mug.4.2008.07.16.13.24.18 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:24:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 22:23:44 +0200 To: "Diego Escalante Urrelo" , "Reinout van Schouwen" Subject: Re: Inhibit bug-buddy on upgrade Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=utf-8 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4875F134.9080106@gnome.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.51 (Linux) From: Christian Kirbach Cc: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: List to discuss bug maintenance in GNOME List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 20:24:35 -0000 On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:08:18 +0200, Diego Escalante Urrelo wrote: > Hey, > > On 7/10/08, Reinout van Schouwen wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I just closed the gazillionth Epiphany crash bug caused by someone >> doing >> a dist-upgrade. >> That got me thinking: Couldn't bug-buddy be inhibited while doing >> package upgrades in the background? What is the outcome? I remember once we had gnome-panel crashing on Ubuntu updates and got tons of duplicates. Took some time before it was clear that it was some library update causing it. -- Christian Kirbach Christian.Kirbach@googlemail.com From reinouts@gnome.org Thu Jul 17 07:26:30 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A090F7500E2 for ; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 07:26:30 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.74 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.74 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.74] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) (up: 90 hrs), (distance 15, link: ethernet/modem), [208.97.132.177] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yFE7EN6XZg8e for ; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 07:26:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from randymail-a4.g.dreamhost.com (sd-green-bigip-177.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.177]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E39B87500C2 for ; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 07:26:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [194.171.119.172] (unknown [194.171.119.172]) by randymail-a4.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67612131982 for ; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 00:26:22 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Inhibit bug-buddy on upgrade From: Reinout van Schouwen To: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org In-Reply-To: References: <4875F134.9080106@gnome.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 09:25:40 +0200 Message-Id: <1216279540.8344.20.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.0-4.1mdv2008.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: List to discuss bug maintenance in GNOME List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 07:26:30 -0000 Op woensdag 16-07-2008 om 22:23 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Christian Kirbach: > What is the outcome? I remember once we had gnome-panel crashing on > Ubuntu updates and got tons of duplicates. Took some time before it > was clear that it was some library update causing it. There is no outcome yet, you are the first person to reply to my proposal. :-| regards, -- Reinout van Schouwen From thenewme91@gmail.com Sat Jul 19 00:25:29 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F51575002E for ; Sat, 19 Jul 2008 00:25:29 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) (firewall!) (up: 7378 hrs), (distance 16, link: (Google 2)), [209.85.132.247] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ztsoKIoUZ5xh for ; Sat, 19 Jul 2008 00:25:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.247]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7187E750077 for ; Sat, 19 Jul 2008 00:24:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c3so232321ana.27 for ; Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:24:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=FE4wml4U8+3ncFx5hGjAuQi43cv9nG7EtaOH3vdB/nE=; b=eFZwCDIGcNnA1EpyaMjwZM/nHLG1WW4MBjyB2cfvGgk3IkUOO/plttW5CcqhL/KrNx rAbG7L88rtkjIDN92d5aj7VYEU6ks4Wd9cIzI3Bfo3CHQ6zufTHCPUmazbsX/LqUTDLD 5AEAinXJ827P0ryElsYhHqL6yYIyFoARiJaeA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=YbGrbhILB3Sxc97aEwfzv1r4m/KPxM+slDYxELDjTzE60HwXU1RcHhJiEcV/oYT6wk /7izImqP47yhTwaaTnmf+9lwBKdgNppZWOwZCL/0+TCoVvcExsoVCHzCF8cqcwNpovGD Hi77VonosIu816Fpyf7oTJ9RJwzTYOZVKO1Zw= Received: by 10.100.32.8 with SMTP id f8mr706170anf.124.1216427096297; Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:24:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.177.10 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:24:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 20:24:56 -0400 From: "Michael Chang" To: "Reinout van Schouwen" Subject: Re: Inhibit bug-buddy on upgrade In-Reply-To: <1216279540.8344.20.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4875F134.9080106@gnome.org> <1216279540.8344.20.camel@localhost> Cc: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: List to discuss bug maintenance in GNOME List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 00:25:29 -0000 On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 3:25 AM, Reinout van Schouwen wrote: > Op woensdag 16-07-2008 om 22:23 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Christian > Kirbach: > >> What is the outcome? I remember once we had gnome-panel crashing on >> Ubuntu updates and got tons of duplicates. Took some time before it >> was clear that it was some library update causing it. > > There is no outcome yet, you are the first person to reply to my > proposal. :-| > Did you try filing a wishlist bug on launchpad? Or have you looked at launchpad's questions system? I don't think very many Ubuntu developers look at the bugsquad list. -- Michael Chang Please note that not all formatting may be preserved in Office/Word/Powerpoint documents sent to me. Please use OpenDocument (not Open XML), HTML, and RTF where possible. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html Thank you. From murrayc@murrayc.com Wed Jul 23 13:37:15 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3D2C7509E2 for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:37:15 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aVJB7c0YCIWw for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:37:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from swarthymail-a4.g.dreamhost.com (lax-green-bigip-5.dreamhost.com [208.113.200.5]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FF62750BDD for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:26:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.1.107] (host-88-217-185-158.customer.m-online.net [88.217.185.158]) by swarthymail-a4.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5850129A84 for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 05:26:43 -0700 (PDT) Subject: New bugzilla product for pangomm From: Murray Cumming To: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 14:26:42 +0200 Message-Id: <1216816002.9784.15.camel@murrayc-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: List to discuss bug maintenance in GNOME List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:37:16 -0000 Could we please have a new bugzilla product for pangomm. Everything can be the same as for gtkmm. -- murrayc@murrayc.com www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com From christian.kirbach@googlemail.com Thu Jul 24 15:59:12 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1572750022 for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:59:12 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N+3YxcMQA3OX for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:58:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com (yw-out-2324.google.com [74.125.46.29]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 884B47504B9 for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:03:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 5so2064388ywh.63 for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 08:02:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=qAtA4rEOTAaCB8+hqJfhRB91AWYKzUnetInYnYnTq6k=; b=EgQZznmPTn6i56Xxo7z8amZID8dxTG+OPykd2u3MvFAAlTttRrMsW0JYMD5F+OPmki hkIGuXpoks3u+3lPQAD6BkHuWQywbc99FQa+EOFrv2Ii1LRsZTlHPMZTEH+UxEu5iMTB alX961UVun1iCDpPYVqwpxafWsIP0JZrs5X5Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=CMRPc0mgeJhCp5ej3TUQf/9DUixcqaT6pO5RJaUyM9CfIocT1I92CDeeX7u/XmR2XI JVI649jQB1D6CQEZGNM7gcekt01nE216GKpheRgb8LA+4fdhJ3HZyGGEk2fVbvpaYfR1 0auqlcty6aUCyAodp2l+v0n12eDDJ8jH93TuA= Received: by 10.114.46.11 with SMTP id t11mr492673wat.211.1216911767593; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 08:02:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.136.11 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 08:02:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <27eeeea00807240802v3c8d0f8fh94981faead49f44a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 17:02:47 +0200 From: "Christian Kirbach" To: "Murray Cumming" Subject: Re: New bugzilla product for pangomm In-Reply-To: <1216816002.9784.15.camel@murrayc-desktop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1216816002.9784.15.camel@murrayc-desktop> Cc: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: List to discuss bug maintenance in GNOME List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:59:13 -0000 2008/7/23 Murray Cumming : > Could we please have a new bugzilla product for pangomm. Everything can > be the same as for gtkmm. Hi Murray product created. Edit it here http://bugzilla.gnome.org/editproducts.cgi?action=edit&product=pangomm Use pangomm-maint@gnome.bugs as default assignee/QA contact and have anybody intrested in pangomm bugs watch that email alias. Regards -- Christian Kirbach From andrew.conkling@gmail.com Wed Jul 30 02:24:15 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06E7B75008C for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 02:24:15 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) (firewall!) (up: 9221 hrs), (distance 15, link: (Google 2)), [74.125.92.25] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CPOweaHwTb1c for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 02:23:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.25]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D59CB7500F8 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 02:23:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 9so65036qwb.9 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:23:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=HTWP4F46uRAfB836zhvF+OJXkWDbvC8AeCXaH9cWcNU=; b=eL6CBHIzsKSWwpH9+Fw23xkuENSM+qIfiUd023WLiJvHMyK3ERDrElvIqcghEQYwEx ssi3xv0I0CRPrXQGIZ/Dr6lPTk0Nu4of/1OAr//L8VrDoRVa7J1cHPmGzvdjohyu6TLm Y1MpSGDh/tOzuwylazccyvzxtBwpFF0nE/1Wo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=BBGcivOK5UAC3Hf3GRVpv5+SL1xSAuPhNpWsUAwkb8A+Ykc+stMVDUOCqJwYr/LAB6 3umzQ05x3DST5YWaT73Qr5QfN2Za8MUNHRovZluZlUxQeQPLjXkuHYov93F3C/KTMYKP a/JMBSTOw3Lc7f6Jio20AQ1Ai/1v6IWtoZ1vk= Received: by 10.214.147.9 with SMTP id u9mr3691612qad.57.1217384618863; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:23:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.206.10 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:23:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <616971f10807291923w69d6f9b2nff833ee4978fbcd8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 22:23:38 -0400 From: "Andrew Conkling" To: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org Subject: Patch status for a non-developer MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_58281_27777342.1217384618827" X-BeenThere: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: List to discuss bug maintenance in GNOME List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 02:24:15 -0000 ------=_Part_58281_27777342.1217384618827 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline I'm trying to coordinate with the developers of Banshee, but I suppose this is a good general question: For a non-developer (like me) interested in contributing to bugs and the inevitable patches, is there a status I can slap on a patch to say, "I've checked this out and, at the very least, it does what it says it does [but I can't speak to its elegance, style, or other code-specific things]"? Any advice would be most appreciated; reviewing patches is, at least for Banshee, a common bottleneck and can be frustrating for developers and contributors. Cheers, Andrew Conkling ------=_Part_58281_27777342.1217384618827 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline

I'm trying to coordinate with the developers of Banshee, but I suppose this is a good general question:

For a non-developer (like me) interested in contributing to bugs and the inevitable patches, is there a status I can slap on a patch to say, "I've checked this out and, at the very least, it does what it says it does [but I can't speak to its elegance, style, or other code-specific things]"?

Any advice would be most appreciated; reviewing patches is, at least for Banshee, a common bottleneck and can be frustrating for developers and contributors.

Cheers,
Andrew Conkling

------=_Part_58281_27777342.1217384618827-- From dieguito@gmail.com Wed Jul 30 03:11:12 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E66FD75008C for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 03:11:12 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.522 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.522 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, TW_HS=0.077] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) (firewall!) (up: 4157 hrs), (distance 13, link: (Google 2)), [209.85.198.225] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q2oKkVc6FH0Z for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 03:11:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.225]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5745750006 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 03:10:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id f6so182851rvb.3 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:10:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=Ouvx81WmX/2vm3nhwC37RF/ljLa8lK7G6AsIOtTmz0Q=; b=t/3/UEv/r/r1/zLwdNiWlDfDmJhm7S/7HpmTaaBRwzwkUyqOI9Na9oFa1yGTiVWcN6 WnDo80cz1N+/dqCLBeXftxAlQQ+AShIWIZSQA2NWvuq71OfbqsBLrykTicdhgwGXewjO M7DO/Rn+7eTaVGk6277RL60EUFETgL46nFszU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=NoIhzCBfw7CeylIZH8M+Gq2hDoHHwF6/821NxNI7UMZCARKYNBBJS2Vd2bMbW/aiJX yobE4830LhkYA1HyArK3aZ5UVzJ+P6+b+8oOPQPL3dQz8Giz2wo3ILiaeKwkxLA9cI/8 qGA31pPn4uiQkECk+ylYX8oATDM4rz3KLXFs0= Received: by 10.114.183.20 with SMTP id g20mr7693005waf.77.1217387432402; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:10:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.191.17 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:10:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 22:10:32 -0500 From: "Diego Escalante Urrelo" Sender: dieguito@gmail.com To: "Andrew Conkling" Subject: Re: Patch status for a non-developer In-Reply-To: <616971f10807291923w69d6f9b2nff833ee4978fbcd8@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <616971f10807291923w69d6f9b2nff833ee4978fbcd8@mail.gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: b5dba8a8868280fd Cc: Rob Bradford , gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: List to discuss bug maintenance in GNOME List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 03:11:13 -0000 Hey On 7/29/08, Andrew Conkling wrote: > I'm trying to coordinate with the developers of Banshee, but I suppose this > is a good general question: > > For a non-developer (like me) interested in contributing to bugs and the > inevitable patches, is there a status I can slap on a patch to say, "I've > checked this out and, at the very least, it does what it says it does [but I > can't speak to its elegance, style, or other code-specific things]"? > > Any advice would be most appreciated; reviewing patches is, at least for > Banshee, a common bottleneck and can be frustrating for developers and > contributors. > Supposedly this is one of the reasons for the PatchSquad[0], there's a mailing list[1] (still with 0 mails) and a wiki. I've been doing something similar for GTK+[2]. Rob Bradford and I were supposed to bootstrap it in GUADEC but didn't have the time to chat about it. Right now I can comment you based on my experience with the GTK+ patches that the hard work is only getting developers to review the patches. I can advice you the following concretely: - Do a list of patches, mostly simple fixes - Group those patches like: small, ready to commit, decision needed, etc. - Try with small patches first so the patch queue flush is more evident. Now, it's a good time to do a call for arms :). Is anyone else interested in starting the patchsquad for real? I mean, start to maybe do IRC meetings and cleaning modules, etc. A good first task would be to pick modules from the module list in the wiki (mostly Vincent modules) and try -say- 5 patches and get together in IRC to try to come up with a common workflow and format to present our work. :) 0 - http://live.gnome.org/PatchSquad 1 - http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/patchsquad-list 2 - http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-devel-list/2008-July/msg00239.html From lmedinas@gmail.com Wed Jul 30 04:12:49 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3464750352 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 04:12:49 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.522 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.522 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, TW_HS=0.077] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) (firewall!) (up: 10159 hrs), (distance 16, link: (Google 2)), [64.233.182.191] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uDf4cI4wBsjX for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 04:12:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.191]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 816EB750583 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 04:12:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c7so53736nfi.23 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:12:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:cc :in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version :x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding:sender; bh=RN+6i9tCjzGxmPT5aGElosu4nD4wPGtb87glIhys5zA=; b=QAdpKrgfdceXiqdpU9MgfXJNrTV9vf3cZCyH+cm6B1eNohTGVQkvxoJZpuYRuzVwaJ ukQjFVlSSBqhwS/H5G54qS9kUYI+Qza7a6m9JBy3g767Fe+9AgOmg4bZgJhL4Ln5Dg9W vcVRfwot0a2jLsmYRlw8wdQWXis3fQQHwORC4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date :message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding:sender; b=LZeIMnUpit4h7P8Tbm77RRD8OHiV90O4ybyawyQZfbnj5Gkz9IwWaR8xZFP2/tYIPE Vgso7O+XgbJb1swfw+mPZz22J1040HICqcYOR6EGzLENCnHo8bwnrPB5AzP+Uzeridy7 oyoXchIUXukkCePOhNR4/87rtGcRvpL9/ALY4= Received: by 10.210.36.8 with SMTP id j8mr8627020ebj.155.1217391133157; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:12:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.67? ( [85.243.176.166]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t12sm1025703gvd.10.2008.07.29.21.12.06 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:12:12 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Patch status for a non-developer From: Luis Medinas To: Diego Escalante Urrelo In-Reply-To: References: <616971f10807291923w69d6f9b2nff833ee4978fbcd8@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 05:11:58 +0100 Message-Id: <1217391119.6252.4.camel@fermi> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: Luis Medinas Cc: Rob Bradford , gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: List to discuss bug maintenance in GNOME List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 04:12:50 -0000 On Tue, 2008-07-29 at 22:10 -0500, Diego Escalante Urrelo wrote: > Hey > > On 7/29/08, Andrew Conkling wrote: > > I'm trying to coordinate with the developers of Banshee, but I suppose this > > is a good general question: > > > > For a non-developer (like me) interested in contributing to bugs and the > > inevitable patches, is there a status I can slap on a patch to say, "I've > > checked this out and, at the very least, it does what it says it does [but I > > can't speak to its elegance, style, or other code-specific things]"? > > > > Any advice would be most appreciated; reviewing patches is, at least for > > Banshee, a common bottleneck and can be frustrating for developers and > > contributors. > > > > Supposedly this is one of the reasons for the PatchSquad[0], there's a > mailing list[1] (still with 0 mails) and a wiki. > > I've been doing something similar for GTK+[2]. Rob Bradford and I were > supposed to bootstrap it in GUADEC but didn't have the time to chat > about it. > Right now I can comment you based on my experience with the GTK+ > patches that the hard work is only getting developers to review the > patches. I can advice you the following concretely: > - Do a list of patches, mostly simple fixes > - Group those patches like: small, ready to commit, decision needed, etc. > - Try with small patches first so the patch queue flush is more evident. > > Now, it's a good time to do a call for arms :). Is anyone else > interested in starting the patchsquad for real? I mean, start to maybe > do IRC meetings and cleaning modules, etc. > A good first task would be to pick modules from the module list in the > wiki (mostly Vincent modules) and try -say- 5 patches and get together > in IRC to try to come up with a common workflow and format to present > our work. > Diego said most of the important things that will be on patchsquad soon. We are going to do final draft of the things that will need to go for the final stage to patchsquad to become a team like patchsquad. This is really a team that needs to happen to improve patches to Gnome go on. Me like Diego, Rob, Lucas, Ken and more people like to give this project some wings. Stay on. From dieguito@gmail.com Wed Jul 30 04:39:53 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D158E75016D for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 04:39:53 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.026 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.026 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_DNS_FOR_FROM=1.496, TW_HS=0.077] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) (firewall!) (up: 10023 hrs), (distance 13, link: (Google 2)), [209.85.146.176] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R7CehQbKsVuG for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 04:39:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.176]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2970B7500F8 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 04:39:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id j40so151792wah.1 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:38:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=my/RBxEZwJwoz6gvufGngHhVaeHTY4DRuHJTBnNE4cI=; b=dSbrx+of4XqKp1U+U1/c0Q7ZIhJaAEucYcQejYFkgl/tDEcLdi35+F9lVzCj94v26K xpmAaqHYsw+03K/etpz9Nb7232DcKxpkS0aYthy7Uw76ZAjTh0B7mdJ6H1Qr/5Um1OAk T2IYrOsmcJ7/Grl2thQfIj/ClGNO02uPg/drw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=f2vZBKmw0g+ttrmTunShtOO9jtgts6jXclIGL18LBgU0A40kSZwVw+nOPVP2VnFEzh bZFpV2hGlhf1wCsjjBvcSwwadO8BJFbFL/Poeei7x3zQMrnAjucJjZJmp1sBgOBJNl40 W198CaDW6+JXL66Vid8tT1ysPEJ4svmyeFWa8= Received: by 10.115.89.1 with SMTP id r1mr7774542wal.12.1217392734129; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:38:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.191.17 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:38:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 23:38:54 -0500 From: "Diego Escalante Urrelo" Sender: dieguito@gmail.com To: "Luis Medinas" Subject: Re: Patch status for a non-developer In-Reply-To: <1217391119.6252.4.camel@fermi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <616971f10807291923w69d6f9b2nff833ee4978fbcd8@mail.gmail.com> <1217391119.6252.4.camel@fermi> X-Google-Sender-Auth: e331fc137fdf0ee2 Cc: Rob Bradford , gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: List to discuss bug maintenance in GNOME List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 04:39:54 -0000 On 7/29/08, Luis Medinas wrote: > On Tue, 2008-07-29 at 22:10 -0500, Diego Escalante Urrelo wrote: > > Hey > > > > On 7/29/08, Andrew Conkling wrote: > > > I'm trying to coordinate with the developers of Banshee, but I suppose this > > > is a good general question: > > > > > > For a non-developer (like me) interested in contributing to bugs and the > > > inevitable patches, is there a status I can slap on a patch to say, "I've > > > checked this out and, at the very least, it does what it says it does [but I > > > can't speak to its elegance, style, or other code-specific things]"? > > > > > > Any advice would be most appreciated; reviewing patches is, at least for > > > Banshee, a common bottleneck and can be frustrating for developers and > > > contributors. > > > > > > > Supposedly this is one of the reasons for the PatchSquad[0], there's a > > mailing list[1] (still with 0 mails) and a wiki. > > > > I've been doing something similar for GTK+[2]. Rob Bradford and I were > > supposed to bootstrap it in GUADEC but didn't have the time to chat > > about it. > > Right now I can comment you based on my experience with the GTK+ > > patches that the hard work is only getting developers to review the > > patches. I can advice you the following concretely: > > - Do a list of patches, mostly simple fixes > > - Group those patches like: small, ready to commit, decision needed, etc. > > - Try with small patches first so the patch queue flush is more evident. > > > > Now, it's a good time to do a call for arms :). Is anyone else > > interested in starting the patchsquad for real? I mean, start to maybe > > do IRC meetings and cleaning modules, etc. > > A good first task would be to pick modules from the module list in the > > wiki (mostly Vincent modules) and try -say- 5 patches and get together > > in IRC to try to come up with a common workflow and format to present > > our work. > > > > Diego said most of the important things that will be on patchsquad soon. > We are going to do final draft of the things that will need to go for > the final stage to patchsquad to become a team like patchsquad. This is > really a team that needs to happen to improve patches to Gnome go on. Me > like Diego, Rob, Lucas, Ken and more people like to give this project > some wings. Stay on. > Ah great, I only knew of Lucas and Rob, and only because Lucas said "talk with Rob" :). Shall we open a thread on patchsquad list then (and in the process take the bubble wrap out of it)? greetings From lmedinas@gmail.com Wed Jul 30 04:50:25 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D29D7506AD for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 04:50:25 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.026 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.026 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_DNS_FOR_FROM=1.496, TW_HS=0.077] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) (firewall!) (up: 9963 hrs), (distance 16, link: (Google 2)), [66.249.90.178] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GemyNZTDnOWS for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 04:50:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ik-out-1112.google.com (ik-out-1112.google.com [66.249.90.178]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEC2075066C for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 04:49:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: by ik-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id c29so227591ika.7 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:49:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:cc :in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version :x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding:sender; bh=Ih1Xhx9Ne/n2G6mW7kihMdvx+vexpkdjJLoggAPWFbw=; b=erh/D/hfJsntw1P9Uxn5MILWqy5uHuGi06to7F4rkVgM5X+Pf1Zwmtd7aYcLnQB2tJ FzZLgtyWoFa3ZWL70c1hSqFI+GPN1hg9KwrBa4rum4Eb6vVAbkrGbIvxg7dSsSomrPiC WGBxpovIZoo310wEw9kjLW+KcY8/yv+y0WLsM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date :message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding:sender; b=cKwjBaZObju/WEyJcPGvo8hpLZcoNvL9QSvzPP61XbNmKCZsq/uixyAmQVdPaJvJSU 0bY17TjAHl2Z5pWVbDmLx8icvh3NmGyqDFFjtzzAtZtD4cXJo2we8uUhTxR57PpGs8Ri dtLKQM49LfajZDyROU456axv1tZ0bcySijsd8= Received: by 10.210.26.10 with SMTP id 10mr8706160ebz.63.1217393370316; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:49:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.67? ( [85.243.176.166]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g9sm1088628gvc.0.2008.07.29.21.49.23 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:49:29 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Patch status for a non-developer From: Luis Medinas To: Diego Escalante Urrelo In-Reply-To: References: <616971f10807291923w69d6f9b2nff833ee4978fbcd8@mail.gmail.com> <1217391119.6252.4.camel@fermi> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 05:49:11 +0100 Message-Id: <1217393351.6252.8.camel@fermi> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: Luis Medinas Cc: Rob Bradford , gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: List to discuss bug maintenance in GNOME List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 04:50:25 -0000 On Tue, 2008-07-29 at 23:38 -0500, Diego Escalante Urrelo wrote: > Ah great, I only knew of Lucas and Rob, and only because Lucas said > "talk with Rob" :). > Shall we open a thread on patchsquad list then (and in the process > take the bubble wrap out of it)? > > greetings Diego, the mailing list is already up (more than 1 year) and i already said i would like to be an admin for that list so yes we should get this going. From dieguito@gmail.com Wed Jul 30 05:21:11 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 580D4750856 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 05:21:11 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.522 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.522 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, TW_HS=0.077] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QSdrrU837ZNL for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 05:21:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.176]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A41275089B for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 05:03:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id j40so158043wah.1 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 22:03:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=VZ6CA3Q0p7qmeg4awX0dBjzIjSbDNjhcXAtB6r4nJ88=; b=PZiL5SJOv/PBjTEu26csTW4NW95FY7pzvWy5T1LKuv1gTLJiXVBbAlsfMOYd9RxNNY cEKyrh0JNOOii7nAtlvn11ePutUOV7BT7ALOkKP+qsCz138C6IVvGDZAvPNRu/yw97VI Fs9XTW58JbTenQw+H9yObdwBf/EZ10g6Os4Qc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=wzpZ0qlQIxStywB5cLY2FJgNkeE8C2NC1K1ZTeMjBX2742QVBaJf7PTDpaQ8KyHeYd orhnCBePJ6ivsejKdMhHlLVsTPnZPx+2WoNhX+vkosUJCBIxg6lsQmglVYv8t4FQZVr6 RNJWzf4h/Z2LPNC2YfBbULjcl/m8JkPQ/9TwU= Received: by 10.115.19.16 with SMTP id w16mr7757863wai.102.1217394202407; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 22:03:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.191.17 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 22:03:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:03:22 -0500 From: "Diego Escalante Urrelo" Sender: dieguito@gmail.com To: "Luis Medinas" Subject: Re: Patch status for a non-developer In-Reply-To: <1217393351.6252.8.camel@fermi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <616971f10807291923w69d6f9b2nff833ee4978fbcd8@mail.gmail.com> <1217391119.6252.4.camel@fermi> <1217393351.6252.8.camel@fermi> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 141556f57a8a6ce6 Cc: Rob Bradford , patchsquad-list@gnome.org, gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org, Olav Vitters X-BeenThere: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: List to discuss bug maintenance in GNOME List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 05:21:12 -0000 On 7/29/08, Luis Medinas wrote: > On Tue, 2008-07-29 at 23:38 -0500, Diego Escalante Urrelo wrote: > > Ah great, I only knew of Lucas and Rob, and only because Lucas said > > "talk with Rob" :). > > Shall we open a thread on patchsquad list then (and in the process > > take the bubble wrap out of it)? > > > > greetings > > > Diego, the mailing list is already up (more than 1 year) and i already > said i would like to be an admin for that list so yes we should get this > going. > CC'ing our awesome sysadmin to get you the powers. But we can just start sending emails in there I think. Actually cc'ing the list too to test that. (first p0st!!! l0lz!!!) From lmedinas@gmail.com Wed Jul 30 06:02:30 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36E247500BE for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 06:02:30 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.522 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.522 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, TW_HS=0.077] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) (firewall!) (up: 9975 hrs), (distance 16, link: (Google 2)), [66.249.90.176] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VdtTAQI3NT-o for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 06:02:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ik-out-1112.google.com (ik-out-1112.google.com [66.249.90.176]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A57E75056D for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 06:02:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: by ik-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id c29so256028ika.7 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 23:01:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:cc :in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version :x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding:sender; bh=qwlyBWbwROPN7F/n1GIP5ILGfWWIY/wxtWCO6HELA44=; b=SNyyI1aDhDHehxL04bC2khgoLHIT76mbuPnzi/84UH10xHUS8cXkXmMNx6teT+n+jC CTkWgaEYjZ6J7ayWMUq+yyf7ucPymhnndEqYyduvBt/pAoragw/OG/F2PLVGOqO7LjgS c2McazFpagodA4Pc13YBeHBluBBKk0IjXL6r4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date :message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding:sender; b=oYl1NAf2h71HuTWApfJjjdX2SQ7KWKA7nGvRwLNorXxOBnyR0C9AhaL29kvsBJ4VBA Iv3n+UA8oLBUcTkiKzErGtKJE2NvUnwjZWLEGTbQ1z2IVlQPGg+s0fqI4gObdo3s06p4 XoFlv0o2PqFg4I3bcds9URzxDK8rM0SSXjoek= Received: by 10.210.120.17 with SMTP id s17mr5671972ebc.181.1217397710441; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 23:01:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.67? ( [85.243.176.166]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j8sm1222328gvb.1.2008.07.29.23.01.39 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 29 Jul 2008 23:01:49 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Patch status for a non-developer From: Luis Medinas To: Diego Escalante Urrelo In-Reply-To: References: <616971f10807291923w69d6f9b2nff833ee4978fbcd8@mail.gmail.com> <1217391119.6252.4.camel@fermi> <1217393351.6252.8.camel@fermi> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 07:01:32 +0100 Message-Id: <1217397692.6252.10.camel@fermi> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: Luis Medinas Cc: Rob Bradford , patchsquad-list@gnome.org, gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org, Olav Vitters X-BeenThere: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: List to discuss bug maintenance in GNOME List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 06:02:30 -0000 On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 00:03 -0500, Diego Escalante Urrelo wrote: > On 7/29/08, Luis Medinas wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-07-29 at 23:38 -0500, Diego Escalante Urrelo wrote: > > > Ah great, I only knew of Lucas and Rob, and only because Lucas said > > > "talk with Rob" :). > > > Shall we open a thread on patchsquad list then (and in the process > > > take the bubble wrap out of it)? > > > > > > greetings > > > > > > Diego, the mailing list is already up (more than 1 year) and i already > > said i would like to be an admin for that list so yes we should get this > > going. > > > > CC'ing our awesome sysadmin to get you the powers. But we can just > start sending emails in there I think. Actually cc'ing the list too to > test that. (first p0st!!! l0lz!!!) This will be a large step for men i'm sure. :) From olav@bkor.dhs.org Wed Jul 30 07:02:06 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E77E9750449 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 07:02:05 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.522 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.522 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, L_P0F_Unix=-1, TW_HS=0.077] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Solaris 10 (beta), (distance 17, link: ethernet/modem), [213.46.255.22] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kGFF4gfMS-XT for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 07:01:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from viefep18-int.chello.at (viefep18-int.chello.at [213.46.255.22]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 483F67504B3 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 07:01:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from edge04.upc.biz ([192.168.13.239]) by viefep18-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.7.08.02.00 201-2186-121-20061213) with ESMTP id <20080730070123.XLL29555.viefep18-int.chello.at@edge04.upc.biz> for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:01:23 +0200 Received: from bkor.dhs.org ([62.163.51.49]) by edge04.upc.biz with edge04 id w7171Z02613hcbA047182t; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:01:23 +0200 X-SourceIP: 62.163.51.49 Received: by bkor.dhs.org (Postfix, from userid 501) id 49065B83AF4; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:01:07 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:01:07 +0200 From: Olav Vitters To: Diego Escalante Urrelo Subject: Re: Patch status for a non-developer Message-ID: <20080730070107.GA15439@bkor.dhs.org> Mail-Followup-To: Diego Escalante Urrelo , Luis Medinas , Andrew Conkling , Rob Bradford , gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org, patchsquad-list@gnome.org, lucasr@gnome.org References: <616971f10807291923w69d6f9b2nff833ee4978fbcd8@mail.gmail.com> <1217391119.6252.4.camel@fermi> <1217393351.6252.8.camel@fermi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Cc: patchsquad-list@gnome.org, Rob Bradford , gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org, lucasr@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: List to discuss bug maintenance in GNOME List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 07:02:06 -0000 On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 12:03:22AM -0500, Diego Escalante Urrelo wrote: > CC'ing our awesome sysadmin to get you the powers. But we can just > start sending emails in there I think. Actually cc'ing the list too to > test that. (first p0st!!! l0lz!!!) I do not know the password for patchsquad-list. Please ask lucasr for it. If he forgot I of course can set a new password. -- Regards, Olav From lucasr.at.mundo@gmail.com Wed Jul 30 08:13:03 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 583137500E4 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 08:13:03 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.522 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.522 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, TW_HS=0.077] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) (firewall!) (up: 6659 hrs), (distance 15, link: (Google 2)), [64.233.184.236] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PfdKt57llDZj for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 08:12:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.236]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE623750449 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 08:12:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id c8so423289wra.27 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 01:12:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=pfQ2dnX3Yf/BUghd52leeMDFPDBV4Khah2cO5vmp+Po=; b=Fscz6pQ/3uox0KAEATf5L+/moue57ePCqFXIbPHDpgXER2B/C65mXKxXtb6cQHc0eK fWwdQYlNIRwDmn59ukVKqQHmzlxeveV/ycHgmy2gaIpRFHYkB3nZPvPExBMWWYx/T4pv dCnI1mkOxzWAGDA4PLuVGtxt4fPP2yF5bIodM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=LLgOrGM9u43IM7fhq6mHlKyHzsLYaNNR+0bEZpbjfXWs4iNi3j+wM6rBYoh4ABriZ3 OSNrncKmpYxCnKDia9ADSmmIEPlcwVzYFcy7ytuPSCkkIgiME9C0g8J4Mi7K3GfF5TKJ 1Bfyymxhz30zTaFrDSGN8xtCXEP3gV8yH3sXc= Received: by 10.90.82.8 with SMTP id f8mr4071394agb.56.1217405550661; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 01:12:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.82.16 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 01:12:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <31a62e6f0807300112m7c337a6bt8b8e098f7e3e42ec@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:12:30 +0300 From: "Lucas Rocha" Sender: lucasr.at.mundo@gmail.com To: "Diego Escalante Urrelo" , "Luis Medinas" , "Andrew Conkling" , "Rob Bradford" , gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org, patchsquad-list@gnome.org, lucasr@gnome.org Subject: Re: Patch status for a non-developer In-Reply-To: <20080730070107.GA15439@bkor.dhs.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <616971f10807291923w69d6f9b2nff833ee4978fbcd8@mail.gmail.com> <1217391119.6252.4.camel@fermi> <1217393351.6252.8.camel@fermi> <20080730070107.GA15439@bkor.dhs.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 70dd3e3bb64de398 X-BeenThere: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: List to discuss bug maintenance in GNOME List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 08:13:03 -0000 Hi, 2008/7/30 Olav Vitters : > On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 12:03:22AM -0500, Diego Escalante Urrelo wrote: >> CC'ing our awesome sysadmin to get you the powers. But we can just >> start sending emails in there I think. Actually cc'ing the list too to >> test that. (first p0st!!! l0lz!!!) > > I do not know the password for patchsquad-list. Please ask lucasr for > it. If he forgot I of course can set a new password. I forgot the password so, please, reset it and send new password to me and Luis Medinas. Thanks, --lucasr From andrew.conkling@gmail.com Wed Jul 30 11:52:28 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8A177501EB for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:52:27 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.102 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.102 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_DNS_FOR_FROM=1.496] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) (firewall!) (up: 10095 hrs), (distance 13, link: (Google 2)), [209.85.146.176] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JGvpAaHhMXKD for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:52:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.176]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6C1E75002E for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:52:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id j40so293722wah.1 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 04:51:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=7mr/gDDMvYcpn+nIczyeRFvPDGvGRLBYQHMIgHkEoDs=; b=YKGEGsKFAPtekt281C2y20mos60YUkeSKr1bMbw5lZs5oEIli0MmtYlmP/+dgtzIBE pY7opgf9qaOq++wlO2y/MkNZWmpEzvjTL7poGG/X2bU9nobMiUBpFOrUzp/62TWRn2Rx YMwLBNUB0ZbP7dZ5MDL+5vjNWGL3gInOl/KtQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=udjkJmqKtoS+FxChL2CIcz9t7yEdmqiv2opclWc/Adfh47hAscxYyzf5j3ImlTT2B+ 2qPjGUnnJybiMPFla5tBeDIHROKjLsuoHzocOBrpd7T3dl+LhVmJmqOrqapo8XWAfK91 9Z015O15aAO55BswCb5n8qjlCXq0GDMbiWbIE= Received: by 10.115.58.18 with SMTP id l18mr8284987wak.177.1217418712092; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 04:51:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.206.10 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 04:51:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <616971f10807300451w76357f72k9d9282303c88a6d0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 07:51:52 -0400 From: "Andrew Conkling" To: "Diego Escalante Urrelo" Subject: Re: Patch status for a non-developer In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_63712_24491159.1217418712074" References: <616971f10807291923w69d6f9b2nff833ee4978fbcd8@mail.gmail.com> Cc: patchsquad-list@gnome.org, gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: List to discuss bug maintenance in GNOME List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:52:28 -0000 ------=_Part_63712_24491159.1217418712074 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 11:10 PM, Diego Escalante Urrelo wrote: > On 7/29/08, Andrew Conkling wrote: > > For a non-developer (like me) interested in contributing to bugs and the > > inevitable patches, is there a status I can slap on a patch to say, "I've > > checked this out and, at the very least, it does what it says it does > [but I > > can't speak to its elegance, style, or other code-specific things]"? > > Right now I can comment you based on my experience with the GTK+ > patches that the hard work is only getting developers to review the > patches. I can advice you the following concretely: > - Do a list of patches, mostly simple fixes > - Group those patches like: small, ready to commit, decision needed, etc. > - Try with small patches first so the patch queue flush is more evident. > > > > A good first task would be to pick modules from the module list in the > wiki (mostly Vincent modules) and try -say- 5 patches and get together > in IRC to try to come up with a common workflow and format to present > our work. Patchsquad or not, how is my review work to be presented to the developers? You mention IRC which a) I rarely use and b) doesn't really suit the task, IMO (I'd likely be around when the main developers aren't, at least for Banshee). I was really wondering about Bugzilla-specific methods. Are there any? Should I send around a "patch summary" via email to the project's mailing list? Thanks, Andrew ------=_Part_63712_24491159.1217418712074 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline

On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 11:10 PM, Diego Escalante Urrelo <diegoe@gnome.org> wrote:

On 7/29/08, Andrew Conkling <andrew.conkling@gmail.com> wrote:
> For a non-developer (like me) interested in contributing to bugs and the
> inevitable patches, is there a status I can slap on a patch to say, "I've
> checked this out and, at the very least, it does what it says it does [but I
> can't speak to its elegance, style, or other code-specific things]"?

Right now I can comment you based on my experience with the GTK+
patches that the hard work is only getting developers to review the
patches. I can advice you the following concretely:
- Do a list of patches, mostly simple fixes
- Group those patches like: small, ready to commit, decision needed, etc.
- Try with small patches first so the patch queue flush is more evident.

<SNIP>

A good first task would be to pick modules from the module list in the
wiki (mostly Vincent modules) and try -say- 5 patches and get together
in IRC to try to come up with a common workflow and format to present
our work.

Patchsquad or not, how is my review work to be presented to the developers? You mention IRC which a) I rarely use and b) doesn't really suit the task, IMO (I'd likely be around when the main developers aren't, at least for Banshee). I was really wondering about Bugzilla-specific methods. Are there any? Should I send around a "patch summary" via email to the project's mailing list?

Thanks,
Andrew

------=_Part_63712_24491159.1217418712074-- From cosimo.cecchi@gmail.com Wed Jul 30 13:05:15 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC46B750108 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:05:14 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.522 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.522 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, TW_HS=0.077] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) (firewall!) (up: 9993 hrs), (distance 17, link: (Google 2)), [72.14.220.154] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ng9xuzPhusGZ for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:05:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.154]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DA017500CF for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:04:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l27so10488fgb.33 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 06:04:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:cc :in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version :x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding:sender; bh=xss7/+/fRwD4zE3Hgz99EbTPhTOuPkDFY8lAeM5zwGQ=; b=Zatz6Fs62J9ZInunVJcQuHoVgQFSz6YxYCnovLxBasA+TC/4ziMe113FZfCzCTd0n8 nLW9bYf7WyLAFa24h9/Ro6yLTvOLdu1qQmN7Ks5B5SGl0VnAfrDfuP9kQncz9uQphtrZ FLnV5z+veUlaal9dh5UZFK2VwKtOuBsEwXlEY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date :message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding:sender; b=jP5L+qRURwEJy3t1K2sH7OpYrctpw8bV1HThxDh4/zQPtPmh9ecPJWCV9nQeh4+Xvc j+5tEZh8uHEJKM/5P3FVo3z3hk+iAnBoOAx1hlJIafd/ZAW73m3/4UhGXGk/qVEuLq3O WirpjUvpTIW6YtEjvRHDWYXhsfNwa6NN0EEHA= Received: by 10.86.33.19 with SMTP id g19mr4853660fgg.50.1217423078427; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 06:04:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.115? ( [78.13.105.235]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 3sm1140084fge.3.2008.07.30.06.04.35 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 06:04:37 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Patch status for a non-developer From: Cosimo Cecchi To: Andrew Conkling In-Reply-To: <616971f10807300451w76357f72k9d9282303c88a6d0@mail.gmail.com> References: <616971f10807291923w69d6f9b2nff833ee4978fbcd8@mail.gmail.com> <616971f10807300451w76357f72k9d9282303c88a6d0@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:04:31 +0200 Message-Id: <1217423071.998.3.camel@pluto> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.23.4 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: Cosimo Cecchi Cc: patchsquad-list@gnome.org, gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org X-BeenThere: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list List-Id: List to discuss bug maintenance in GNOME List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:05:15 -0000 On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 07:51 -0400, Andrew Conkling wrote: > Patchsquad or not, how is my review work to be presented to the > developers? You mention IRC which a) I rarely use and b) doesn't > really suit the task, IMO (I'd likely be around when the main > developers aren't, at least for Banshee). I was really wondering about > Bugzilla-specific methods. Are there any? Should I send around a > "patch summary" via email to the project's mailing list? I believe sending a mail to the mailing list (or directly to the maintainers if there's no mailing list for the project) is the best option. At least, it seems to work really fine for Diego and GTK+ :) Cheers, -- Cosimo From andrew.conkling@gmail.com Wed Jul 30 13:32:55 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org Delivered-To: gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BE0B750491 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:32:55 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.229 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.229 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MISSING_HEADERS=1.292, TW_HS=0.077] X-Amavis-OS-Fingerprint: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) (firewall!) (up: 4261 hrs), (distance 13, link: (Google 2)), [209.85.198.224] Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7QfJd65k41PI for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:32:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.224]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 624C47502A5 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:32:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id f6so14501rvb.3 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 06:31:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:subject :cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=Yrdh8QhKkyqaDbJPQFf+9cv/K6dLxn7XMqy+oAhhgGY=; b=ww8Xo+Tcp2MFiwNQHpN+N/nEjKIxry+RyPUpUJ6YtOB54XIJErRbyoLMLpwRBY/zP2 wOgBmStKcUMG0M3erWkvXjw0qxX5ggj148urxEY6Gn3HpmnikcuViQk+bnj3OOLp55nj eHIAps5D+9zHLkWNohPYp7Gk+Ob2hZhSgjq9s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=jB5dhGCeqv7PAsj4FVf0tvVuqMF+KvgI96iefGbXbNzOat5EM2Z69csyjKMHIFpHvJ Sj3a0y+klRTARqKp7wktdJ2eLBzRdz14zR4EWLGvppxSZtHMgouI9Wc1Sz6+fzsKyMXI ytOSYRpAPMAUZTPJB4tj9YxtHIXL4l5CAEKow= Received: by 10.140.201.1 with SMTP id y1mr4237750rvf.246.1217424717218; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 06:31:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.206.10 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 06:31:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <616971f10807300631u61fed378t61a601c0928ea7bb@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:31:57 -0400 From: "Andrew Conkling" Subject: Re: Patch status for a non-developer In-Reply-To: <616971f10807300451w76357f72k9d9282303c88a6d0@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_65013_2775231.1217424717178" References: <616971f10807291923w69d6f9b2nff833ee4978fbcd8@mail.gmail.com>