[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [xml] Duplicate PI nodes issue
- From: "Cory Nelson" <phrosty gmail com>
- To: "Alistair Leslie-Hughes" <leslie_alistair hotmail com>
- Cc: xml gnome org
- Subject: Re: [xml] Duplicate PI nodes issue
- Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 16:47:31 -0800
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 4:30 PM, Alistair Leslie-Hughes
<leslie_alistair hotmail com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have the following program below, when it runs it produces the follwing
> ouput
> <?xml version="1.0"?>
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
>
> Is this a bug?
> How can I work around the issue, assuming I have to support differ libxml
> version?
>
> Please assume that the xml and content parameters are dynamic strings.
>
> Best Regards
> Alistair Leslie-Hughes
>
>
> #include <string.h>
> #include <libxml/tree.h>
> #include <libxml/parser.h>
> #include <libxml/xpath.h>
> #include <libxml/xpathInternals.h>
>
> int main(int argc, char* argv[])
> {
> xmlDoc *doc = NULL;
> xmlNodePtr nodePI = NULL;
>
> xmlInitParser();
>
> doc = xmlNewDoc( xmlCharStrdup("1.0") );
> nodePI = xmlNewPI( xmlCharStrdup("xml"), xmlCharStrdup("version=\"1.0\"
> encoding=\"UTF-8\""));
> xmlAddChild( (xmlNodePtr)doc, nodePI);
>
> xmlSaveFile("zzzzzz.xml", doc);
> xmlFreeDoc(doc);
> xmlCleanupParser();
>
> return 0;
> }
>
An XML declaration might look like it, but the standard says it is not
a PI and that PIs cant be named "xml" (or any case variant of it). So
I would say the only bug here is that xmlNewPI is not returning with
an error.
--
Cory Nelson
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]