Re: [xml] WG: xmlwriter function naming convention

[Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>]

On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 03:16:09PM +0100, Mickautsch, Alfred wrote:
> Sorry, I should have sent the mail to the list :-(.
> 
> 
> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Mickautsch, Alfred 
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 12. Februar 2008 15:15
> An: 'veillard redhat com'
> Betreff: AW: [xml] xmlwriter function naming convention
> 
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: Daniel Veillard [mailto:veillard redhat com]
> > Gesendet: Dienstag, 12. Februar 2008 13:13
> > An: Mickautsch, Alfred
> > Cc: xml gnome org
> > Betreff: Re: [xml] xmlwriter function naming convention
> > 
> > 
> >   yes, Flushing at the end of the EndDocument functions would make sense,
> > could you design such a patch ?
> > 
> 
> I attached a patchfile against libxml2 2.6.31, which adds the call to xmlTextWriterFlush at the end of xmlTextWriterEndDocument.

  Okay, but then we should modify the function comment which states:

  * Returns the bytes written (may be 0 because of buffering) or -1 in case of error

Since we force the flush there '(may be 0 because of buffering)' should be
removed and I'm also adding that this call flushes the output in the 
description.

  thanks !

Daniel

-- 
Red Hat Virtualization group http://redhat.com/virtualization/
Daniel Veillard      | virtualization library  http://libvirt.org/
veillard redhat com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine  http://rpmfind.net/