[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [xml] XML Schema QNames
- From: Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>
- To: Adam Dickmeiss <adam indexdata dk>
- Cc: xml gnome org
- Subject: Re: [xml] XML Schema QNames
- Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 05:48:39 -0500
[ Seems my answer from yesterday didn't appear in the mailing-list, reposting ]
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 12:20:37AM +0100, Adam Dickmeiss wrote:
> I've seen what appears to be a bug in the handling of type names in XML
> schema handler of libxml2. These type names are referred to as QNames in
> the XML
> schema standard.
>
> See:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#section-Constraints-on-XML-Representations-of-Schemas
>
> The issue can be illustrated with the schema:
>
> <schema xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema'
> targetNamespace='http://my.ns/'>
> <element name='my' type='string'/>
> </schema>
>
> Here, the omitted prefix in 'string' is treated as NS http://my.ns/,
> when it should really be http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema
Oh, okay.... my head did hurt each time I have tried to really understand
from the spec the expected behaviour about namespace propagation and
composition in the context of XML Schemas.
> Attached is a patch.ns + 2 new tests which modifies
> xmlschemas.c:xmlGetQNameProp so that it returns default namespace if
> prefix is omitted for Qname. The patch also _removes_ 'fallback' to
> targetNamespace, which IMHO is not to be used.
okay,
> Removing this fallback made test po1_0.xsd fail. It turned out that this
> schema had two bad type references with omitted prefixes (when that was
> not allowed). Patch for po1_0.xsd is part of patch.ns.
Hum, I think I copied po1_0.xsd directly from the XML Schemas Primer,
maybe I made a mistake doing that copy or I missed something else...
I applied the patch, maybe this will fix the problem that the xmlbench
author reported about QName when running the benchmark suite.
In general I very much welcome fixes you and others can provide w.r.t. XML
Schemas implementation and cleanup. There is a large test suite a W3C but
when I looked at it nearly 2 years ago libxml2 Schemas was really too
incomplete to even start trying running against it. Maybe this would make
more sense now, though there is still a parts which are not implemented
like identity constraints.
Thanks a lot, this was just commited in CVS,
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard redhat com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]