[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [xml] License confusion
- From: Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>
- To: uttam rao <auttamrao hotmail com>
- Cc: xml gnome org
- Subject: Re: [xml] License confusion
- Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 09:40:17 -0400
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 12:18:28PM +0000, uttam rao wrote:
> Hello sir,
> I want to use libxml in one of our commercial product.
> I saw on the website that it released under 'MIT' license which allows me to
> use it inside my commercial product without publishing my source codes. But
> in the downloaded package of libxml in file 'copying' there is a description
> of 'GNU LIBRARY GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE' so which one is the right one.
> In short does it force me to publish my software freely if I use libxml?
Recent libxml2 release are under the MIT licence. Older ones
were under the LGPL (or W3C IPR).
Use a recent one.
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard redhat com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]