Re: [orca-list] buffering

[Krishnakant <hackingkk gmail com>]

On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 10:58 +0200, Hermann wrote:
> On 30.03.2009 at 20:27:59 Krishnakant <hackingkk gmail com> wrote:
> 
> > I would just like to add one important tip.
> >
> > While certain seasoned practices sound very stable and have the tag of
> > being "well tested and experienced ", we must always welcome ideas which
> > sound better  but go against that long tradition.
> > Orca, we all know gets feedback from the best brains which any talking
> > software can really get.
> > This implies that the most stupid and the smartest person has equal say.
> 
> Persons like me?
> 
hehe I don't see any reason why you call yourself stupid? *smile*

> > Some times it happens that a so called stupid is not really so and her/
> > his idea may have not even clicked to we smart hackers and that's where
> > different approaches to solve the problem at hand comes up.
> >
> Oh, I'm very grateful to be understood by a "smart hacker", even if that
> happens only "sometimes".
> 
there will always be differences and the only thing expected is that it
does not turn into a personal attack and disrespect to that person.


> > I don't want to go in the debait of wether buffered approach is better
> > or non-buffered approach, but what ever the orca team decided has
> > yielded great results and I believe it also directly reflects on how
> > well a web page is designed with accessibility in mind.
> >
> What would you say, if that Orca team changes their minds?
> 
Orca team may change the mind depending on what the community decides
and after some proper research.
I will answer this personally when the orca team "changes its mind ".
> > I can just say that wili and the rest of the team has been as best as
> > they could be and the decisions on the approaches have not been just the
> > decisions of the "orca development team ", but the entire community
> > excluding some few exceptions.
> >
> I got the mmessage. But as always: The majority is silent, and the
> "prophets" think it is on their side.
> 
Arguements need proof, so if community is not on the "side " then dear
community please *speak up *.

> >
> > happy hacking.
> > Krishnakant.
> >
> BTW: Do you know what "hacking" means in Germany? To break into other
> peoples computer in order to steal data, such as passwords, bank account
> data etc.
BTW, what you are refering is "cracking " and not "hacking ".  Hacking
is an art of inovatively creating a solution to a problem given the
constraints.

So it is like breaking (hacking ) a problem into bits and then sorting
out the solution.
That's why hackers are hackers who solve problems and not "crackers "
who crack the security or code for a software etc.

happy hacking.
Krishnakant.