[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [orca-list] installing orca on debian



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

I'm replying this back to the list because Jason would have never seen
your message otherwise.  I wish this list was configured with Reply-To
going to the list instead of the sender.  But anyway, I installed
numerous packages over the past week so forgot specifically which dev
packages I needed to get at-spi to compile.  I think I recalled
looking for the name of missing header files and I know that if the
./configure step fails, it usually will mention the actual missing
packages.  Then I can just search for the needed package in aptitude.
For these compiles and such, I look for the package name and for any
package-dev name.  So far, that has generally worked out pretty well.
I think a lot of this would be easier if Debian wouldn't break up so
many packages.  But I suppose if someone has no desire to compile any
programs, they could save space by not installing any *.dev packages.
Me on the other hand, I prefer to install the whole of a package
including standard headers and the like.

On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:35:18PM -0500, Alonzo wrote:
> hello Jason,
>
> I tried addingg the experimental reposityr ot my system and did
> aptitude install gnome-orca/experimental
>
> I deleted the packages for now because at-spi and a python package could 
> not be configured correctly. so I'm not sure what to do. I know steve 
> said he search for the deb counter parts of header files, but I'm not 
> sure which header filesto start looking for.
> Gconf is installed and aptitude build-dep gconf does nothing and seems to 
> have meet all dependencies.
>
> alonzo
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Holmes" 
> <steve holmes88 gmail com>
> To: <orca-list gnome org>
> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 6:34 AM
> Subject: Re: [orca-list] installing orca on debian
>
>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: RIPEMD160
>>
>> When I recompiled all the orca related packages from svn recently,
>> everything pretty much compiled flawlessly.  A couple times I ran into
>> problems with missing headers and the like but was able to track them
>> down in searching in aptitude and installing the dev counterparts of
>> those packages.  I'm using it now.  Is experimental a replacement for
>> unstable or is that yet another level of Debian package maintenance?
>> I'm still on Testing right now because I just got started with Debian
>> and I wanna get comfortable with how things work in this environment
>> before I go off and start experimentaing with potentially unstable
>> packages.
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 01:26:54PM +0800, Li Yuan wrote:
>>> Hi Alonzo,
>>>
>>> Maybe you need gconf related packages installed.
>>>
>>> Li
>>>
>>>
>>> 2008/10/30 Alonzo <mariachiac aim com>
>>>
>>> > I'll include the previous message that I wrote to Jason since it 
>>> did > not
>>> > get posted to the list.
>>> > One thing to add here was I did do the process to build the > 
>>> dependencies
>>> > and got the errors attatched to my first message when trying to install
>>> > at-spi.
>>> >
>>> > Hello Jason,
>>> >
>>> > How stable is debian experimental? I could beleive upgrade from 
>>> lenny > to
>>> > experimental. I could try that and see what happens. However, this
>>> > happened when trying to install at-spi, not Orca itself.
>>> > So does it still apply?
>>> >
>>> > Alonzo
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 15:34 +1100, Jason White wrote:
>>> > > On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 11:23:44PM -0500, Alonzo wrote:
>>> > > >
>>> > > > I'm using Debian Lenny and wanitng to install the latest version of
>>> > > > Orca.
>>> > >
>>> > > Try adding an entry for the Debian "experimental" repository to your
>>> > > /etc/apt/sources.list, then install
>>> > > sudo aptitude update
>>> > > sudo aptitude install gnome-orca/experimental > > 
>>> python-pyatspi/experimental
>>> > >
>>> > > The reason why your attempt to build Orca from source didn't work 
>>> is > > most
>>> > > likely a missing dependency, perhaps the wrong version of autoconf.
>>> > >
>>> > > If you still want to build from source, try this:
>>> > >
>>> > > sudo aptitude build-dep gnome-orca
>>> > >
>>> > > which should install everything you need to build the packaged > 
>>> > version of
>>> > > Orca. (The dependencies shouldn't have changed much since then).
>>> > >
>>> > > The version of Orca in Debian Experimental is currently 2.24.1-1.
>>> > >
>>> > > Regards,
>>> > >
>>> > > Jason.
>>> > >
>>> > > _______________________________________________
>>> > > Orca-list mailing list
>>> > > Orca-list gnome org
>>> > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
>>> > > Visit http://live.gnome.org/Orca for more information on Orca
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Orca-list mailing list
>>> > Orca-list gnome org
>>> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
>>> > Visit http://live.gnome.org/Orca for more information on Orca
>>> >
>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Orca-list mailing list
>>> Orca-list gnome org
>>> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
>>> Visit http://live.gnome.org/Orca for more information on Orca
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
>>
>> iEYEAREDAAYFAkkJm9gACgkQWSjv55S0LfETbwCg8rGNOaoNfTF4Iz+TtBCUqZ/v
>> wGkAn0dWPoaPp+ighX4Tj4ZwCBVTqpES
>> =lOF6
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> _______________________________________________
>> Orca-list mailing list
>> Orca-list gnome org
>> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
>> Visit http://live.gnome.org/Orca for more information on Orca
>>
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEAREDAAYFAkkKoAAACgkQWSjv55S0LfHdTgCdFm+3A1IBIGpMgjXM3lBdC5Vi
XmgAoMVQ9R84WL46XyGUcCD5vV+ygLrq
=8qKh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]