[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[orca-list] quality
- From: "Albert E. Sten-Clanton" <albert e sten_clanton verizon net>
- To: "Willie Walker" <William Walker Sun COM>, <orca-list gnome org>
- Subject: [orca-list] quality
- Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 11:11:31 -0500
Will, this seems as good a time as any to express my appreeciation of the unerringly constructive way you respond on this list to problems and criticisms. The message below is a fine example. I only hope I'll do at least half as well if I'm ever in a position anything like yours on a project.
Al
----- Original Message -----
From: "Willie Walker" <William Walker Sun COM>
To: <orca-list gnome org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 8:21 AM
Subject: Re: [orca-list] Orca 2.22.0 a bad regression
> Hi Kenny:
>
> Giving presentations and raising awareness is part of the development
> process. CSUN is typically our one time during the year to do this.
> These few short days also represent a time where the small distributed
> team can get together face-to-face to debug and do additional planning.
> It's also the one time during the year for us to interact with a large
> population of users and have valuable face-to-face conversations for
> problems specific to them. Furthermore, it also represents a time to
> interact with other technology developers to lay the grounds for more
> open source work.
>
> There will always be deadlines and dates out of our control, and
> everything this year was kind of a "perfect storm" of such things: GNOME
> 2.22, Firefox 3 freezing, OpenOffice 2.4, CSUN, the GNOME Accessibility
> Outreach Program, etc. They all occurred right around the same time and
> they all demanded attention.
>
> These deadlines where not only complex to handle from the program
> management perspective, but they were also very high stress because
> things outside our control often changed and introduced unexpected
> regressions very late in the game. When things outside our control
> broke (and they did), we would spend time to create detailed and
> informative bug reports for the offending components. We would then
> work with the other teams in a professional manner to resolve the issues
> quickly. We would also take the opportunity to provide patches for the
> other components if we were able to understand their code base. This
> kind of working pattern helped keep things moving forward in a
> constructive manner.
>
> During this difficult period, our dedicated team worked around the
> clock, and I believe we were very responsive to problems people were
> posting. Unfortunately, we were not able to address them all. There
> are more deadlines for GNOME 2.22.x releases -- 2.22.1 on April 7,
> 2.22.2 on May 26, and 2.22.3 on June 20. If you provide details for the
> specific problems you are experiencing, we can move forward in a
> constructive manner to resolve them for future releases.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Will
>
> Kenny Hitt wrote:
> > Hi. I'm very disappointed with Orca 2.22.0 I'm trying to read several web pages with Firefox and having no luck.
> > It looks like the only way to get access to Firefox back is to downgrade to Orca 2.20. It does work there.
> > These aren't complicated pages. At this point, you can't even read the Gnome user guide with Firefox and Orca 2.22.0.
> > What makes this really bad is it appears Orca developers knew Firefox access was broke, but they released it any way and then left for the week.
> > Showing off new things at a conference is good, but what about your user base? Like it or not, you now have users who depend on Firefox access.
> >
> > Kenny
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Orca-list mailing list
> > Orca-list gnome org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
> > Visit http://live.gnome.org/Orca for more information on Orca
>
> _______________________________________________
> Orca-list mailing list
> Orca-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
> Visit http://live.gnome.org/Orca for more information on Orca
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.21.7/1333 - Release Date: 3/18/2008 8:10 AM
>
>
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]