Mark Ivey wrote:
My understanding of aligments is that they deal with the free space beyond that required by the child widget. That means the scale factors take the fraction of free space and add it to the child widget required space. Likewise the align factors determine the fraction of free space to be allocated to the left or above the widget. For example:Wow, that's unfortunate. I didn't really want to just pad it...that almost goes back to the bad days of absolute positioning.
Anyone have any idea why the alignments aren't more "exact" with their scales? Is this intended?
-Mark Ivey-
On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 09:58, Stefan Kost wrote:
In the GNOME HIG they really suggest to use a label containg spaces for padding (I don't like that as well). That means you should put each button in a hbox(2) and put the padding label into the first slot of the hbox and your button into the second one. :-(
Stefan
Mark Ivey wrote:
I don't understand something about alignments, hopefully someone can
help me out. My window contains a 4-row vbox filled with alignments. Each alignment has the same settings:
x align: 1.0
y align: 0.0
x scale: 0.5
y scale: 1.0
Each alignment also contains a 1 button. The buttons have different
labels, like this:
a
as
asd
asdf
Now, I would expect all the buttons to take exactly half the window, but they don't. The buttons with shorter labels are slightly wider. FWIW, this happens with labels also, not just buttons
So what's the deal?
My ultimate goal is to have a layout like this, where all the widgets are lined up 1/3 of the way out from the left edge:
Section heading ---------------- widget widget widget
Another section ---------------- widget widget
...is there a better way to do it?
John