Re: Example in Docs: GPOINTER_TO_INT

[mk daveg com]

>  And _imho_ usign of macro GPOINTER_TO_INT and GINT_TO_POINTER will not add
> more portability to code _now_ and _may_ add more portability in the
>_future_.
> Am I right?

IMHO opinion as a bystander (and born a fortran coder...), these macros 
should  be taken out and shot. 
(For me, these ugly int/pointer tricks were about the only thing that kept 
my i386/linux code (chemtool) from compiling and running on 64bit SGI 
'out of the box'.)

Martin
-- 
Dr. Martin Kroeker, daVeg GmbH Darmstadt  CAD/CAM/CAQ  mk@daveg.com
                      Precision Powered by Penguins