[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Gnumeric 1.7.11 for Windows?
- From: "Pedro Lino" <plino cripsul ipimar pt>
- To: gnumeric-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Gnumeric 1.7.11 for Windows?
- Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 22:23:59 +0100 (WEST)
Hi again Jody
Just to clear where I stand: I'm not a brat shouting on a mailing list.
I'm someone who cares about Gnumeric and is trying to contribute to have a
stable, powerful Windows spreadsheet.
> What modifications or suggestions have we ignored ?
> I'll make another win32 release when it will fix problems.
This is just the proof that my messages are being ignored... Since the
1.7.6 installer you can not create a chart in Gnumeric (due to the problem
with the dislocated pixmaps). I think that creating charts is a pretty
important feature (at least in my work). Isn't that reason enough to
create a new win32 release?
I know you can move the files manually to the appropriate folder but this
is just for advanced users. Imagine a new user that downloads the 1.7.10
build for the first time (there is no warning on the Gnumeric homepage
that this is a development build) and tries to do something as simple as
adding a chart...
> 2) Welcome to open source. My development window is on the commuter
> train in the mornings and evenings and things take time. Check
> your irritation at the door. As my grandmother taught me.
> "If you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything"
I have been using and supporting open source projects for a long time
(years). I have said many nice things about Gnumeric but I think that I
don't need to start every email with compliments...
> 3) The priorities for win32 are
> a) enable python
> b) fix printing
> c) create an installer
> d) finish automating the build
> in that order.
I would consider the first priority eliminating all bugs that cause the
program to crash and then add new features.
> NOTE : I intentionally released the 1.7.11 package in something the
> average win32 user would not install, a tar.bz2. Without an
> installer it was not suitable for anyone that did not know how
> to handle that non-standard format. eg it did not update the
> registry, or install shortcuts, or mime type handlers ...
That sounds reasonable. But you could warn the users (at least those in
the mailing list)
> Win32 is in better shape than before in that I can actually debug
> things finally. However, there is some polish to be done before
> 1.8.0.
I agree that Gnumeric is improving with each version. That's why I
insisted on having the latest build to keep contributing!
Peace,
Pedro
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]