Dual license under the GFDL and the CreativeCommon so maximum
reusability can be reached.
On 11/1/06, *Quim Gil* < qgil desdeamericaconamor org
<mailto:qgil desdeamericaconamor org>> wrote:
We need a default license for wgo. Any recommendation?
I guess the first decision is if we go for GFDL or one of the
CreativeCommons family.
I have no strong opinion. Anyone?
On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 19:54 +0100, Thilo Pfennig wrote:
> The license issue should be raised for all content on
*.gnome.org. I
> think it is possible to have a mix of licenses but the CMS must help
> the user to select a license (otherwise there should be a default
> one). This would allow us and others to exchange content with
> Wikipedia or other documentation projects .Not with
OpenOffice.org or
> fedoraproject.org <http://fedoraproject.org> though because they
choose some kind of minority
> licenses: PDL and OPL. Thats why I would rather prefer GFDL or
one of
> the Creative Commons licenses.
--
Quim Gil /// http://desdeamericaconamor.org