Re: AT-SPI build

["Diego A. Fons" <diegofons apexar com ar>]

David Bolter wrote:
> Diego,
>
> Yes, the AT-SPI is what you want. I haven't tried using the AT-SPI 
> without X but it would be great to know how far you can get with that 
> configuration. What are you building?
>
> cheers,
> David Bolter
> Diego A. Fons wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying to build my own accessible application, so searching for 
> > info i've found that it's necessary to have AT-SPI. The problem is 
> > that AT-SPI needs the X libraries and i've built GTK+ using DirectFB 
> > port.
> > Is it strongly necessary to build the AT-SPI with X? can i build it 
> > without X at all? (I already configured it with the --without-x flag).
> >
> > Regards,
> > Diego A. Fons.
> > _______________________________________________
> > gnome-accessibility-list mailing list
> > gnome-accessibility-list gnome org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-list
> >   
Hi David,

Thank you for your reply.
I'm trying to build an application that uses a touchscreen as the only 
input device, so i thought it would be a good idea to have a GOK style 
keyboard, you select the component to edit and start entering the text 
whit an on-screen keyboard. When i start looking at the GOK code i 
realized that i need AT-SPI (and GAIL?).

In a mail after yours, Ariel Rios says that i must have X :(
It's a very bad news, i'm going to try to build X (is x.org X11R7.2 a 
good idea?) but i have to be careful because the application has to run 
on an embedded device (cpu AT91SAM9261) and i seem X don't like embedded 
devices :P

Regards,
Diego A. Fons.