From lichengtai@gmail.com Wed Apr 26 15:47:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gconf-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gconf-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBC9E3B1556 for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2006 15:47:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13191-06 for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2006 15:47:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.187]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72A1E3B0BC5 for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2006 15:47:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id m18so1262094nfc for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2006 12:47:33 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=neBIYalvE1a8L2khuVzKmoQ9YCOdLHBe+tIEkWq+wUGo0ifAEYFWRapdLFsdnxObC5PU7M6NzYGHnwY5TyY9JQGIzd+OlEEmCOskJgF1xsuMGSe3ozrdE32h5fMx2nswc0wAKb/u1xzBcbOsI246S2QzLjWKbm06J8VCrjpWjOw= Received: by 10.48.208.20 with SMTP id f20mr468209nfg; Wed, 26 Apr 2006 12:47:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.48.203.19 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Apr 2006 12:47:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <205815110604261247h29ad9e95i110a7e477db22207@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 12:47:33 -0700 From: "Andy Tai" Sender: lichengtai@gmail.com To: gconf-list@gnome.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_9149_3560467.1146080853374" X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.357 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-0.991, BAYES_20=-0.74, HTML_30_40=0.374, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] X-Spam-Score: -1.357 X-Spam-Level: Subject: GConf and DBus X-BeenThere: gconf-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the GConf library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 19:47:40 -0000 ------=_Part_9149_3560467.1146080853374 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi, just curious is using DBus and DBus only in place of ORBit the directio= n of the future of GConf? Thanks, -- Andy Tai, atai@atai.org ------=_Part_9149_3560467.1146080853374 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi, just curious is using DBus and DBus only in place of ORBit the directio= n of the future of GConf?
Thanks,

--
Andy Tai, atai@atai.org ------=_Part_9149_3560467.1146080853374-- From spam@pvanhoof.be Thu Apr 27 04:09:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gconf-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gconf-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60E353B1ECC for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 04:09:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18835-07 for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 04:09:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.freax.org (mail.freax.org [86.39.154.66]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCAC53B0475 for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 04:09:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.freax.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6657AE7673; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 10:06:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.freax.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.freax.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 23595-04; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 10:06:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lort.newtec.be (mailhost.newtec.be [62.58.98.194]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.freax.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E11DE7672; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 10:06:42 +0200 (CEST) From: Philip Van Hoof To: Andy Tai In-Reply-To: <205815110604261247h29ad9e95i110a7e477db22207@mail.gmail.com> References: <205815110604261247h29ad9e95i110a7e477db22207@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 10:09:08 +0200 Message-Id: <1146125348.5378.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.394 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.072, BAYES_00=-2.599, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.135, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] X-Spam-Score: -2.394 X-Spam-Level: Cc: gconf-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: GConf and DBus X-BeenThere: gconf-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the GConf library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 08:09:14 -0000 On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 12:47 -0700, Andy Tai wrote: > Hi, just curious is using DBus and DBus only in place of ORBit the > direction of the future of GConf? > Thanks There's a GConf branched in CVS that has a port to D-BUS (I think maemo is using it). But as it only uses normal remote procedure calls and no (or very few, but I didn't find any) use of the D-BUS signals, you can say that it's a 1 on 1 port from ORbit-2 to D-BUS. Which isn't ideal: For example with the D-BUS signals and signal arguments, D-BUS has specific features that would make a better solution for the notification of changes. ps. There's some people who are planning to someday redesign such a system. They started with writing a specification. But as that is offtopic here, you can E-Mail me and I'll give you the pointers. -- Philip Van Hoof, software developer at x-tend home: me at pvanhoof dot be gnome: pvanhoof at gnome dot org work: vanhoof at x-tend dot be http://www.pvanhoof.be - http://www.x-tend.be From lichengtai@gmail.com Wed Apr 26 15:47:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gconf-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gconf-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBC9E3B1556 for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2006 15:47:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13191-06 for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2006 15:47:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.187]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72A1E3B0BC5 for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2006 15:47:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id m18so1262094nfc for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2006 12:47:33 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=neBIYalvE1a8L2khuVzKmoQ9YCOdLHBe+tIEkWq+wUGo0ifAEYFWRapdLFsdnxObC5PU7M6NzYGHnwY5TyY9JQGIzd+OlEEmCOskJgF1xsuMGSe3ozrdE32h5fMx2nswc0wAKb/u1xzBcbOsI246S2QzLjWKbm06J8VCrjpWjOw= Received: by 10.48.208.20 with SMTP id f20mr468209nfg; Wed, 26 Apr 2006 12:47:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.48.203.19 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Apr 2006 12:47:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <205815110604261247h29ad9e95i110a7e477db22207@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 12:47:33 -0700 From: "Andy Tai" Sender: lichengtai@gmail.com To: gconf-list@gnome.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_9149_3560467.1146080853374" X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.357 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-0.991, BAYES_20=-0.74, HTML_30_40=0.374, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] X-Spam-Score: -1.357 X-Spam-Level: Subject: GConf and DBus X-BeenThere: gconf-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the GConf library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 19:47:40 -0000 ------=_Part_9149_3560467.1146080853374 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi, just curious is using DBus and DBus only in place of ORBit the directio= n of the future of GConf? Thanks, -- Andy Tai, atai@atai.org ------=_Part_9149_3560467.1146080853374 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi, just curious is using DBus and DBus only in place of ORBit the directio= n of the future of GConf?
Thanks,

--
Andy Tai, atai@atai.org ------=_Part_9149_3560467.1146080853374-- From spam@pvanhoof.be Thu Apr 27 04:09:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gconf-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gconf-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60E353B1ECC for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 04:09:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18835-07 for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 04:09:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.freax.org (mail.freax.org [86.39.154.66]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCAC53B0475 for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 04:09:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.freax.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6657AE7673; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 10:06:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.freax.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.freax.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 23595-04; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 10:06:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lort.newtec.be (mailhost.newtec.be [62.58.98.194]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.freax.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E11DE7672; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 10:06:42 +0200 (CEST) From: Philip Van Hoof To: Andy Tai In-Reply-To: <205815110604261247h29ad9e95i110a7e477db22207@mail.gmail.com> References: <205815110604261247h29ad9e95i110a7e477db22207@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 10:09:08 +0200 Message-Id: <1146125348.5378.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.394 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.072, BAYES_00=-2.599, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.135, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] X-Spam-Score: -2.394 X-Spam-Level: Cc: gconf-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: GConf and DBus X-BeenThere: gconf-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the GConf library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 08:09:14 -0000 On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 12:47 -0700, Andy Tai wrote: > Hi, just curious is using DBus and DBus only in place of ORBit the > direction of the future of GConf? > Thanks There's a GConf branched in CVS that has a port to D-BUS (I think maemo is using it). But as it only uses normal remote procedure calls and no (or very few, but I didn't find any) use of the D-BUS signals, you can say that it's a 1 on 1 port from ORbit-2 to D-BUS. Which isn't ideal: For example with the D-BUS signals and signal arguments, D-BUS has specific features that would make a better solution for the notification of changes. ps. There's some people who are planning to someday redesign such a system. They started with writing a specification. But as that is offtopic here, you can E-Mail me and I'll give you the pointers. -- Philip Van Hoof, software developer at x-tend home: me at pvanhoof dot be gnome: pvanhoof at gnome dot org work: vanhoof at x-tend dot be http://www.pvanhoof.be - http://www.x-tend.be From lichengtai@gmail.com Wed Apr 26 15:47:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gconf-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gconf-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBC9E3B1556 for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2006 15:47:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13191-06 for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2006 15:47:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.187]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72A1E3B0BC5 for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2006 15:47:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id m18so1262094nfc for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2006 12:47:33 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=neBIYalvE1a8L2khuVzKmoQ9YCOdLHBe+tIEkWq+wUGo0ifAEYFWRapdLFsdnxObC5PU7M6NzYGHnwY5TyY9JQGIzd+OlEEmCOskJgF1xsuMGSe3ozrdE32h5fMx2nswc0wAKb/u1xzBcbOsI246S2QzLjWKbm06J8VCrjpWjOw= Received: by 10.48.208.20 with SMTP id f20mr468209nfg; Wed, 26 Apr 2006 12:47:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.48.203.19 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Apr 2006 12:47:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <205815110604261247h29ad9e95i110a7e477db22207@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 12:47:33 -0700 From: "Andy Tai" Sender: lichengtai@gmail.com To: gconf-list@gnome.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_9149_3560467.1146080853374" X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.357 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=-0.991, BAYES_20=-0.74, HTML_30_40=0.374, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] X-Spam-Score: -1.357 X-Spam-Level: Subject: GConf and DBus X-BeenThere: gconf-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the GConf library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 19:47:40 -0000 ------=_Part_9149_3560467.1146080853374 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi, just curious is using DBus and DBus only in place of ORBit the directio= n of the future of GConf? Thanks, -- Andy Tai, atai@atai.org ------=_Part_9149_3560467.1146080853374 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi, just curious is using DBus and DBus only in place of ORBit the directio= n of the future of GConf?
Thanks,

--
Andy Tai, atai@atai.org ------=_Part_9149_3560467.1146080853374-- From spam@pvanhoof.be Thu Apr 27 04:09:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: gconf-list@gnome.org Delivered-To: gconf-list@gnome.org Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60E353B1ECC for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 04:09:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18835-07 for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 04:09:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.freax.org (mail.freax.org [86.39.154.66]) by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCAC53B0475 for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 04:09:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.freax.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6657AE7673; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 10:06:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.freax.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.freax.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 23595-04; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 10:06:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lort.newtec.be (mailhost.newtec.be [62.58.98.194]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.freax.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E11DE7672; Thu, 27 Apr 2006 10:06:42 +0200 (CEST) From: Philip Van Hoof To: Andy Tai In-Reply-To: <205815110604261247h29ad9e95i110a7e477db22207@mail.gmail.com> References: <205815110604261247h29ad9e95i110a7e477db22207@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 10:09:08 +0200 Message-Id: <1146125348.5378.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.394 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.072, BAYES_00=-2.599, FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.135, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] X-Spam-Score: -2.394 X-Spam-Level: Cc: gconf-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: GConf and DBus X-BeenThere: gconf-list@gnome.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the GConf library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 08:09:14 -0000 On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 12:47 -0700, Andy Tai wrote: > Hi, just curious is using DBus and DBus only in place of ORBit the > direction of the future of GConf? > Thanks There's a GConf branched in CVS that has a port to D-BUS (I think maemo is using it). But as it only uses normal remote procedure calls and no (or very few, but I didn't find any) use of the D-BUS signals, you can say that it's a 1 on 1 port from ORbit-2 to D-BUS. Which isn't ideal: For example with the D-BUS signals and signal arguments, D-BUS has specific features that would make a better solution for the notification of changes. ps. There's some people who are planning to someday redesign such a system. They started with writing a specification. But as that is offtopic here, you can E-Mail me and I'll give you the pointers. -- Philip Van Hoof, software developer at x-tend home: me at pvanhoof dot be gnome: pvanhoof at gnome dot org work: vanhoof at x-tend dot be http://www.pvanhoof.be - http://www.x-tend.be