uh, so why does the code ust rfc 2047 decoding? >From what i can read ... "two or more 2047 encoded words" is more accurate than using "words", which have ZER0 I18N capability. On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 09:18 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > Sure, although this is just a workaround for broken mailers. It is > illegal to encode parameters like this using the rules in rfc2047. > Mailers are supposed to be using rfc2231 (or its predecessor, rfc2184). > > Jeff > > On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 04:58, Andrei Nigmatulin wrote: > > Hello, > > > > This patch fixes incorrect decoding of attachment filename. > > If filename specified in Content-Disposition header is made > > of two or more "encoded words" (in terms of rfc2047) > > then mailer try to decode such filename as it was one "encoded word". > -- > Jeffrey Stedfast > Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc. > fejj ximian com - www.ximian.com > > _______________________________________________ > Evolution-patches mailing list > Evolution-patches lists ximian com > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-patches