[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [Evolution] Evolution Website (was: Evo FAQ)
- From: "Patrick O'Callaghan" <poc usb ve>
- To: Matthew Barnes <mbarnes redhat com>
- Cc: evolution-list gnome org, Todd Ness <Todd Ness eds com>
- Subject: Re: [Evolution] Evolution Website (was: Evo FAQ)
- Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 19:26:10 -0400
On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 12:23 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 09:38 -0600, Todd Ness wrote:
> > The first thing that jumps out at me on the documentation link provided
> > are the evolution 2.6 release notes. Which makes me think that oh this
> > must be an unmaintained site.
> >
> > Then if you study carefully you might notice this small FAQ and user
> > manual for 2.12.
> >
> > Maybe that ought to be re-done so that what you want people to see/use
> > is prominent. It is just a suggestion though. I could be one of the rare
> > Morons that gets distracted by the old version number being 3 times the
> > size of the current documentation
>
> I agree. The fact of the matter is that the site *has* been more or
> less unmaintained for awhile. I've been trying, in recent weeks, to
> blow the dust off and get things up-to-date again. I do intend to
> update the release notes there for version 2.12. My own procrastination
> is to blame for that. :)
>
> I should also mention that I created a new "Website" Bugzilla category
> for the Evolution component. Please feel free to file website bugs or
> suggestions for improvement there. I'll be monitoring that category.
Does this mean you are now the person to yell at about
documentation? :-)
poc
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]