On Fri, 03 Nov 2006 09:13:28 +0100 "Reinhard Brandstaedter" <Reinhard Brandstaedter jku at> wrote: >On Thu, 2006-11-02 at 20:39 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote: >> hi reinhard, >> >> Am Donnerstag, den 02.11.2006, 13:56 +0100 schrieb Reinhard >> Brandstaedter: >> > What information is used for threading if i don't use the fall back >> > method by subject. Maybe the information is stripped by groupwise >> > or >any >> > virus scanner? >> >> Evolution supports "References:" and "In-Reply-To:" headers. >> "Thread-*" headers are Microsoft's proprietary headers and not >> supported. > >It seems to me exactly this doesn't happen! >If I switch OFF "Fall back to threading messages by subject" I don't >get threads at all! >I only get threads when this option is switched to ON but if i thread >by subject it's not correct. > >I've checked the mail sources and they contain the correct header >information. KMail for example threads the messages correct, even if i >only thread by header information and not Subject. > >Reinhard > To get proper threading with a Groupwise backend, you need to use the IMAP protocol vs. SOAP for connecting to the mail server. There's give and take here with regard to appointments and such, but I like my threads, so I start Evo with 'USE_IMAP=1 evolution' Try this and see if it's better for you (as long as IMAP is enabled on that server). -- Cheers, Trey ---- It will be advantageous to cross the great stream ... the Dragon is on the wing in the Sky ... the Great Man rouses himself to his Work. Linux salamander 2.6.16.21-0.25-default i686 GNU/Linux 1:10pm up 19:33, 7 users, load average: 0.77, 0.30, 0.22
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature