[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [Evolution] Mismatch between subject and message contents
- From: "Patrick O'Callaghan" <poc usb ve>
- To: evolution-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Evolution] Mismatch between subject and message contents
- Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 16:32:38 -0400
Depends what you mean by "shut down". The shutdown utility on Linux
sends a signal which processes can trap and gives them a little time to
clean up. Only then does it kill them preemptively. A properly-written
application should never get into an inconsistent state because of the
system being shut down, and in fact I haven't seen Evo misbehaving in
this way.
A different issue is what happens if you lose power or just close the
laptop lid without warning. Not all Linux distros handle
suspend-and-resume gracefully.
poc
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 14:09 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> that's a question to ask the kernel hackers :)
>
> On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 14:01 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 10:31 -0600, Jeff Nelson wrote:
> > > I shut down my notebook without first exiting evolution and that lead
> > > to the new corruption. Deleting the index files caused new ones to be
> > > generated.
> >
> > Why can't Linux handle this gracefully like Windows? On that OS when I
> > shut down all the apps are closed in an orderly fashion, with an
> > opportunity to save any unsaved work, etc. On Linux it seems to just
> > blithely kill everything.
> >
> > Lee
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Evolution-list mailing list
> > Evolution-list gnome org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
> >
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]