Re: [Evolution] Multiple instances of evolution

[JP Rosevear <jpr novell com>]

On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 09:32 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
>On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 17:19 -0700, JP Rosevear wrote: 
>>On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 10:34 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
>>> 
>>> I don't see how any such patch could possibly work very well, so i
>>> wouldn't get too excited about it.
>>
>>Why not?  As noted the main thing is the two separate camel sessions.
>
>Yes, two separate camel sessions.  Thats certainly a show-stopper for
>this 'working very well', don't you think?

Umm, yes, and thats a) why its not in and b) what I originally stated
several messages ago.  I thought you were implying there was some
additional major issue that I had not already covered.

JP
-- 
JP Rosevear <jpr novell com>