[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [Evolution] SMTP AUTH and Evo
- From: Adam Williams <awilliam whitemice org>
- To: Tony Earnshaw <tonni billy demon nl>
- Cc: evolution ximian com, Jeffrey Stedfast <fejj ximian com>
- Subject: Re: [Evolution] SMTP AUTH and Evo
- Date: 02 Sep 2002 08:56:44 -0400
>>GSSAPI is what provides Kerberos V, yes?
>No, Kerberos V provides Kerberos V.
It Cyrus IMAPd, OpenLDAP, PHP, and Samba; Kerberos V *IS* provided via
GSS. "gssapi.h" is found under /usr/kerberos/include/gssapi/. But I
don't know if there is another -direct- API that can be used. I only
use Kerberos V not develope on it
>>I've asked about this on the
>>list a couple of times. I've seen other people ask about it. Kerberos
>>networks are hardly rare, and becoming more common.
>I'd dispute that. I would assert that Kerberos is an outdated system
>from the beginning of time that is rapidly being overtaken by more
>recent technology. And I know, because I have to know how to configure
>and use it.
I'll have to flat out disagree. Windows 2000, XP, and Active Directory
*finally* brought Kerberos V to the M$ platform. It is the ONLY
authentication method supported by an AD "domain" (mixed mode aside).
Don't see how that makes it outdated. And I certainly don't see
anything standing in line to compete with it. It is the ONLY
single-sign-on technology I've ever encountered that actually works.
>>Linux boxes in a
>>WinY2k domain are almost certainly using Kerberos V.
>That is not so.
? Then what do they do. winbind, etc..., only support NT4 domains.
Turn off mixed-mode on the server, and what have your got - Kerberos V.
>>Please consider
>>this requested. Evolution is the only app that I actually have to enter
>>a password (beyond gdm of course) to access stuff.
>You wouldn't have to enter a password unless someone (a sysadmin?) made
>that mandatory.
I am the sys-admin. So people should be able to access mailboxes
without authenticating to the mail server?
>Having to enter a password does not mean anything else
>than that you are required to authenticate yourself by any one of
>several different means.
Yea, that is the point.
>If you have to enter a password in Evo, you'd
>have to enter it in Mozilla or Outlook as well.
Don't know about mozilla. But not in Outlook on WinY2k, or pine on
UNIX. They support Kerberos V and perform ticket forwarding and
negotiation and I'm authenticated to the mail server with no password,
as I already authenticated to the KDC (when I logged in). Kerberos V is
a single sign-on system.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]