Re: [Evolution] SMTP AUTH and Evo

[Not Zed <notzed ximian com>]

see:

http://www.iana.org/assignments/sasl-mechanisms

:)

On Mon, 2002-09-02 at 15:15, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
> søn, 2002-09-01 kl. 15:32 skrev Not Zed:
> 
> > > > Currently we support the following SASL mechanisms:
> > > > CRAM-MD5, DIGEST-MD5, KERBEROS_V4, LOGIN, PLAIN, and SPA (aka NTLM)
> 
> > > Some might say that a number of these, if not all, are not SASL.
> 
> > why?
> 
> Because SASL (Simple Authentication and Security Layer) is an
> authentication mechanism that uses an underlying system (ususally a
> Kerberos key base) for its purpose.
> 
> Cram_MD5 is a cipher mechanism, LOGIN is a login mechanism, AUTH PLAIN
> is a mechanism for plain text user/password authentication, KERBEROS V¤
> is Kerberos (and out of date anyway) SPA is Microsoft's Secure Password
> Authentication which one could compare with PPP CHAP.
> 
> None of these are SASL. Visit ftp.andrew.cmu.edu and check out Cyrus
> SASL which is a pain in the behind for those trying to configure
> Openldap to use it - the latest versions use Kerberos V5 as underlying
> mechanism..
> 
> To my mind, TLS and AUTH PLAIN are quite sufficient (if used correctly)
> to ensure privacy of mail.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Tony
> 
> -- 
> 
> Tony Earnshaw
> 
> The usefulness of RTFM is vastly overrated.
> 
> e-post:		tonni billy demon nl
> www:		http://www.billy.demon.nl
> gpg public key:	http://www.billy.demon.nl/tonni.armor
> 
> Telefoon:	(+31) (0)172 530428
> Mobiel:		(+31) (0)6 51153356
> 
> GPG Fingerprint = 3924 6BF8 A755 DE1A 4AD6 FA2B F7D7 6051 3BE7 B981
> 3BE7B981
> 
>