Re: [Evolution] SMTP AUTH and Evo

[Adam Williams <awilliam whitemice org>]

>>Currently we support the following SASL mechanisms:
>>CRAM-MD5, DIGEST-MD5, KERBEROS_V4, LOGIN, PLAIN, and SPA (aka NTLM)
>Some might say that a number of these, if not all, are not SASL. Others
>might say, that they find you have a great product anyway and know what
>you mean. They might also say that, on a Sunday, as an old employer of
>mine once asked: "Ain't you got no home to go to?"
>>We've also got code for ANONYMOUS, but it's not hooked up to anything
>>iirc, mostly because it works slightly different from the rest.
>>At some point we also plan on adding GSSAPI (but so far no one seems to
>>have requested it?).
>No. Well, I don't need it yet, either.

GSSAPI is what provides Kerberos V, yes?  I've asked about this on the
list a couple of times.  I've seen other people ask about it.  Kerberos
networks are hardly rare, and becoming more common.  Linux boxes in a
WinY2k domain are almost certainly using Kerberos V.  Please consider
this requested.  Evolution is the only app that I actually have to enter
a password (beyond gdm of course) to access stuff.