Re: [Evolution] Evolution vs Evolution

["Zot O'Connor" <zot zotconsulting com>]

I use cyrus imap (and pop).  Setup is easy, and there are tools for
tranfer.

I have never seen a lock up problem with it.  I have actually opened
multiple evo's to the same mailbox (and hammered it).

Cyrus is a bit different in that all mail stays under the cyrus account
and is stored in a central spool.  This means local tools like elm will
not work.  POP and IMAP still works.  Cryus uses pam so users do not
have to have a /etc/passwd account on the system.  I use a gdbm file and
script on one system.  I have friends runnign large scale school systems
on cyrus+perl_ldap, everything is web based.  This allows for a greater
security model (not the least is that your email password does not mean
anything past email).

On the whole I have found no problems with Cyrus itself, and it has a
lot of features I never get around to using.

On Thu, 2001-11-29 at 06:31, Trevor Nichols wrote:
> On Thu, 2001-11-29 at 23:58, Ross Burton wrote:
> > Its the IMAP server.  imapd is the University of Washington IMAP server
> > which doesn't like multiple connections.  I believe if there are
> > multiple simultaneous connections it will drop the original connection. 
> > The behaviour however is weird, I see it all of the time at work (RH62
> > server, with Evo and OE as clients) but my boss never sees it at home
> > (imapd on Solaris).  Maybe its a file locking issue which doesn't appear
> > on Solaris builds.
> 
> I'm using that same IMAP server on a FreeBSD box, same problem.  Do you
> know of / are there another easily configurable IMAP server which does
> allow multiple connections of the same mailbox?
> 
> -Trev
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> evolution maillist  -  evolution ximian com
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
> 
-- 
Zot O'Connor

http://www.ZotConsulting.com
http://www.WhiteKnightHackers.com