[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [Evolution] IMAP in Evolution is SLOOOOOOOOOOW.



Actually I find that evolution's Imap support is pretty quick.  The MAIN problem
I'm having is that Evolution doesn't stay running very long before the mail
component dies.  I've done killev and oafd-slay and rerun Evolution.  It stays
up for a while and then dies again.  My backup is Outlook in Win4Lin until
Evolution stabilizes some more (and I have to admit, it gets better with EACH
and EVERY snapshot release..great work guys) and then I'll get rid of Outlook
permanently.  

I wondering, I have a copy of Nautilus 1.0 installed along w/Evolution and I
notice that it appears as if some of the packages used by Nautilus are later
than the Ximian packages.  Specifically, in Ximian it uses
control-center-1.2.2-0_helix_1, Evolution uses control-center-1.2.3-100_helix...
and nautilus uses control-center-1.3.90-0_plain_0.  I wonder if this has
something to do w/my problems.

Also, I was wondering about LDAP support.  Do I have to recompile Evolution
locally w/LDAP support or is this just functionality that isn't there yet?

Thanks

-C


> --__--__--
> 
> Message: 28
> Subject: Re: [Evolution] IMAP in Evolution is SLOOOOOOOOOOW.
> From: Joe Shaw <joe ximian com>
> To: Austin Gonyou <austin coremetrics com>
> Date: 29 Mar 2001 12:46:45 -0500
> 
> On 29 Mar 2001 11:29:11 -0600, Austin Gonyou wrote:
> > I have several thousand messages in IMAP on the server. When doing an
> > update, it takes a long freakin time, (several minutes), and then only
> the
> > folder I was currently on was updated. Can anyone shed some light on
> this?
> 
> I have a similar setup (a single INBOX with ~25000 messages in it) that
> I access through IMAP. Of course, the first time you run it it'll take
> forever because it has to summarize it, but after that, IMAP is quite
> quick for me. There's the overhead of actually downloading the message,
> but that goes away once you read a message once as it is cached on the
> local disk. I am using CVS HEAD, though. The main problem I've seen
> recently is a bit of lag in the GUI when new messages come in (the GUI
> blocks for a second or two and then the message list loses its focus).
> VFolders seem a little slow too and the number of unread messages isn't
> being updated correctly, but I am just getting back into the swing of
> using VFolders.
> 
> Joe
 




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]