[Off-topic] Re: 0.96 pre

["Young, Robert" <Robert Young dsto defence gov au>]

> christian.ridderstrom wrote:
>On Fri, 2 Mar 2007, Young, Robert wrote:
>
>> Rob.
>
>Hi Rob,
>
>> IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Australian Defence 
>> Organisation and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the 
>> CRIMES ACT 1914.  If you have received this email in error, you are 
>> requested to contact the sender and delete the email.
>
>I don't think you meant to send me this specifically, so I've 
>been a nice boy and deleted the mail. Oh, and this is 
>contacting you of course ;-)
>
>Oh.... damn... I just realized that when I cut away parts of 
>your post, I was took liberties with property of the 
>Australian Defence Organisation. 
>Much Sorry ;-) ;-) ;-)
>
>Have a Nice Weekend!
>/Christian
>
>PS. I understand Rob may not have any say over what he puts in 
>his signature, but IMHO that kind of signature is a waste of 
>bandwidth...

Apologies for the wasted bandwidth - until you wrote this I didn't know
that this was happening. Unfortunately there's nothing I can do to stop
it, sorry.

I guess all I can say is that you're not receiving this email in error
:-)

Rob.