[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Composition [was Re: gnome-session proposal]
- From: Alan Cox <alan lxorguk ukuu org uk>
- To: David Zeuthen <david fubar dk>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org, Iain * <iaingnome gmail com>, Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net>
- Subject: Re: Composition [was Re: gnome-session proposal]
- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 09:36:11 +0100
> Get a better kernel then ;-). On a more serious note, didn't the recent
> Firefox 3 O_SYNC fiasco on Linux make some file system developers
> realize some short comings of current state of the kernel? If so,
Synchronous I/O is *very* slow but you need to discuss that mostly with
hardware vendors if you must use it. Hard disks have very low
operations/seconds and very high internal latencies you can't hide if the
application demands synchronous I/O.
That is why we have fsync/fdatasync and thread creation...
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]